Precision Instruments and the Demonstrative Order of Proof in Lavoisier's Chemistry Author(s): Jan Golinski Reviewed work(s): Source: Osiris, 2nd Series, Vol. 9, Instruments (1994), pp. 30-47 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/301997 . Accessed: 20/06/2012 14:38 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Osiris. http://www.jstor.org Precision Instruments and the Demonstrative Order of Proof in Lavoisier's Chemistry By Jan Golinski* If it is true that a controversy approaches its conclusion by the accumulation of facts that impinge upon it, it is only so pro- vided these "facts" are without ambiguity in their implications. For otherwise, twisted by the rival hypotheses, and sometimes with so many more words that they convey less sense, these "facts" so multiply the extraneous questions that controversies become endless. Thus prejudice and imagination freely hold sway and logic is replaced by fashion. -Jean-Andr6 Deluc (1790)1 HAT,I AFTERMORE THAN A DECADE OF DEBATEabout the fundamen- tals of chemical theory,Jean-Andre Deluc should express frustrationis not really surprising.As an upholderof the traditionaltheory of phlogistonand an oppo- nent of the new theory of Antoine-LaurentLavoisier, Deluc fearedthat the contro- versy would never end.