WikiLeaks Document Release http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RS20688 February 2, 2009
Congressional Research Service Report RS20688 Instant Messaging on the Internet: Interoperability Issues of Competition and Fair Access Jeffrey W. Seifert, Resources, Science, and Industry Division
Updated March 28, 2002
Abstract. Instant Messaging (IM) is one of the fastest growing Internet applications. The recent debate about IM is related to the broad issues of open access rules and competition in the high speed Internet service and cable television markets. Although IM technology has evolved largely independent of formal regulation, a review of the pending AOL-Time Warner merger has brought issues of interoperability among IM services under scrutiny both in the U.S. and Europe. Concerns about fair access, and accessibility for the disabled, are being raised by Members of Congress, the FTC, the FCC, and the European Commission. These issues highlight the growing complexity of regulating converging technologies. This report discusses the technology behind instant messaging and provides an overview of the issues. http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RS20688 Background digital assistants. and IM combinestheimmediacyofatelephone Summary 74; 1 exchange text people. mail about [http://www.canada.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-1556076.html] BarryNance,“InstantMessaging: Goodfor provides anoverviewoftheissues.Itwillbeupdatedasnecessary. technologies. (EC). (FTC), e both AOL-Time competition disabled, IM recent CRS ReportforCongress xchange
John
will soonbecomeavailableforwireless Interoperability IssuesofCompetitionand
messages. technology (e-ma Instant
Instant the in Theseissueshighlightthegrowingcomplexityofregulatingconverging
Initssimplestform,IMapplicationsareusedfor thesynchronousexchangeof
Congressional Research Service
Borland,
the debate the
files, future
have il) tocreateaninstantaneoussystemforexchanging messagesbetweentwo messages
Instant MessagingontheInternet: Analyst inInformationScienceandTechnologyPolicy Federal
Warner messaging
US in Messaging Thisreportdiscussesthetechnologybehindinstantmessagingand However,recentdevelopmentsinIMtechnology alsonowallowusersto
pictures,
been the
about “Instant
has of Received throughtheCRSWeb 1 and Resources, Science,andIndustryDivision
IM, Communications high
(AOL-TW)
evolved between
raised
Europe. IM
suggesting
(IM) and
Messaging
speed (IM)
is
even by
is largely
Concernsaboutopenaccessandaccessibilityforthe multiple related
is
Internet Members one
merger Fair Access one voice Jeffrey W.Seifert
Moves that
of
ofthefastestgrowingInternetapplications.The Commission independent
to
the
messages. IM
IM service
brought issues
to the
of
E-Commerce?”
fastest
services) software Cell
call devices Congress,
broad
Phones,”
and ˜ ˜ with
Manyindustryobserversareoptimistic
growing (FCC), o
The Library ofCongress
f formalregulation,areviewofthe
cable such could among
issues the
t of CNet
he FederalTradeCommission
Computerworld network
as and
television
interoperability become free
cellular IM o
News.com the f openaccessrulesand
servi services
European
presence part
phones markets. ces ontheInternet. ,
of 23 ,
under 15 May2000,p. Updated March28,2002
Web (the February
Commission and of Order CodeRS20688 Although
scrutiny electronic
ability browsers
personal
2000,
to http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RS20688 merged approved competition capabilities largest “walled The dominance inEuropewasfarweakerthantheUnitedStates. and In Time Warner,which complicated pan-European United less potentialforsuchmonopolisticcontrolbya [http://europa.eu.int/comm/role_en.htm]. digital deliveryofmusic,sports,andentertainment merger shut itself (digitalmusic, (AOL-TW) merger. either new a will beraisedagaininthecontextofarelatedtechnology. the to debate services it 2 AOL-Time -Time Warner,Inc.merger.Concernshavebeenraisednotonlyabout 5 October 2000,[http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/12/technology/12ONLI.html]. 4 2000, A1. Alex 3 G. KrugerandAngeleA.Gilroyforamorecomprehensive reviewofopenaccessissues.
ElizabethWasserman, “TheOtherTrustbuster,” EdmundAndrews,“NoConcessionsinAOLMerger,” EdmundL.Andrews,“Europe ApprovesAOL-TimeWarnerDeal,”
See
company
could develop October
high
Vivendi
media CRS Klein, In In Both The FTC out
directly
serves cable
States,
Europe, with the
company
such leverage speed
garden”
competitors’
interest
Issue the
U.S.
review
“Europe
as content
capable United 2000 Warner
byaproposed50-50jointventurebetweenBritish-basedEMIMusicand in between
SA. EMI
t
AOL-TW a as or elevision company,therewasagreaterfocusoninfrastructurequestions. as
Internet
Brief o
Internet medium and one
the
ther observerscitedAOLEurope’srapidgrowthasoneoftheleading digital TheECdidnotincluderestrictionsregardingIM,decidingthatAOL’s indirectly, a
in
the
its
to and
of case
States, whereAOLis concentrated (cable
of
Watches
IM
EC European being
IB10045,
books,
company, open
customer represent EC
rival
controlling digital
sever
a
subscriber stems service study
was
service for merger c
approved
cess
TV,
a its ISPs
as
communications dominant Warily primarily videos). its
Broadband of cable part from
media.
regulators
Internet
to
providers
relationship base two ofthefivelargestrecordingcompaniesinworld.
and with and particularly
the
on a distribution
of lines
significant as the
system
the
broad
cable
choice
3 against their TheEC,FTC,andFCCallexaminedtheIMissue, conditions.
the
TheproposedAOL-TWmergerwasfurther
AOL concerned force
larger
access, merger onthe (DSL), whichrunsovertelephonelines.
Internet
CRS-2 expressed (ISPs)
the
implications larger Althoughsomeobserversbelievedtherewas
television markets.
issues Flexes
to of
with
in
providers
on and debate largest
portion competing technologies. channels
cable-based satellite The Standard
overall
Theseconditionsincludedrequiringthe as Access:
European about
“open of openaccessrulesandcompetitionin entertainment, combined Muscles,”
an
concern
N
regarding ISP
ew
of indicator
condition
the
of of broadcasts), reviews
for
Background access” both York
and
ISPs alternative
combining
combined Internet
media
Washington 5 the AOL-TW
, 8September 2000, that InDecember2000theFTC
Time 2 Times the AstheInternetcontinues
the
be
of of emerging
4
it
Time the distribution
f as
giants
America ore its the
is
, Warner services,
as 7 and
merger
possible a
N company’s potential
high
September
AOL-Time
di AOL in ew well
Warner Post means
Issues fferent technical
Bertelsmann the Europe thanthe
York market speed
Online is , as
is
would possibility of 18
but
channels
these the
,
the
allowed to by
call to T September
2000,
ability
also imes
Interne
second-
create The Lennard content Warner
for (AOL)
ensure
create off issues
, 12 that
AG
C9; the IM
for
its to to
a t http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RS20688 for a some industry 8 2000, [http://www.internetnews.com/isp-news/article/0,2171,8_404471,00.html] 7 December 2000. 6 currently an names,” incarnation feature 9 entertainment message requirement that also [http://www.fcc.gov/csb/aoltw/07-27-00_enbanc/agenda.html]. issue at acomparablelevelasitdoesitscableservices. and requiringthemergedcompany 10 Times stored to new 2002, [http://www.newsbytes.com/news/02/175316.html] available The computers. ability or offer either merged Who [http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2001/fcc01011_fact.pdf]. its IMsystemandthatofthreeothercompetitors Screennamesarepseudonyms usedtoidentify
Patricia
Patrick
number David
Steven
consumer a
important shoppers,
IM communications person
Although The Most approved its , 6October2000,[http://www.nytimes.com/cnet/CNET_0_4_2948607_00.html] directly
implements
on to Provides
Lan
8 and
software own company
Fusco, Ross,
immediately
to of use FCC, enter to Bonisteel, a
IM TouseanIMapplication,usersfirstcreateapersonaldirectoryof“buddies”.
central sky andJeremyPelofsky,“AOL/TimeWarnerWins FTCBlessing,”
of potential chat t
communicate.
Internet access
o initiatethediscussion.IMismoreexpeditiousthane-mailbecause high-speed
IM
and
as
business value,
“AOL
observers IM
“AOL: services into earlier which
the
part via instantmessaging.Usersthen while
AOL-TW
alerts
to from an
did server
to Instant ex
“Instant merger support
IM industry-wide
Time
business
of technologies
Instant
Relay held appears
clusive accessagreementswithATT,theFCCalsorestricted interactive
not forms 42%
tool. offering the
require
was its cable
predict thatIMwillgrowintoa$6billionmarketasitbecomes until
Warner However,asIMhasgrowninpopularityandfunctionality, become
hearings
users
overarching
open may
9
Messaging
C seen Accordingtosomeestimates,29%ofUScorporations with communication Messaging
of
uses
Messaging access, the hat (IRC)haveexistedforoveradecade,thecurrent on
users
advanced
synchronous begin
theperson’sscreen.Incontrast,e-mailmessagesare when oneormoreoftheuser’s“buddies”is
television
its as recipient
Can’t
for co and standard
widely
to about
a cable
nditions. InadditiontoreinforcingtheFTC’s
to IM, prohibiting
way continue
to Interoperability preserving
be concerns Increases download CRS-3
utilize
the including
IM servicessuchasvideoconferencinguntilit available systems
for Trusted
decides services
or
a and
Services
impact chat
younger person enables
to IM
collaboration
6 the
competition regarding
support
in
On
to
to
technology, and
send for providing until provided
interferencewitheitherthecontent
sending of Workplace,”
is
check competitor
Access, interoperability
users, business
a the inst
an Non-Issue,” 1997.
. and and
all asmallprogramontheir
merger
invitation and
the or
by often live
Hill
between
promote 7 in suchastheUnix“talk” receiving
Originallynotedforits InJanuary2001theFCC
in development Who download non-affiliated
a
ISPs online
Panel the
Newsbytes
“virtual using on
InternetNews
or
standards future.
IM,
and restrictingits Uses service
its DSLservices T customer instant a
unusual old,”
short the addressed
office” 10
,
R
and
online
providers, messages.
Thereare
19 Them? providers euters New York messages.
message between ,
“screen
28 March service
use where
June ,
and
the
15 of http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RS20688 12 October 2001,p.14. 11 provides 2000, A3. available, Although handling 1.2billionmessagesonSeptember11. congested cellphone-based negotiations. members communicate withanotherpersonwhousesYahoo! Messenger. rapid However, twoqualitativechangesintheIMmarketmaychangethissituation. services, regulation. Interoperability Issues Messenger, andMSNMessenger. programs 2000, Task be chooses. Theresultis conform that associated vested (IMPPWG) interoperable standard interoperability Internet asaresourcethatisaccessibletoallpeople,regardlessoftheirdisability. interoperability issueshavearisenthatcouldaffectthefuturegrowthofIM. more Accessibility by identified, Alex
Jill
companies using
IM
A growingnumberofIMservicesarenowavailable,mostatnocosttotheuser. In Unti The Within
Force increase Carroll,
the
akin interest
Daniels andBrendanBarrett, “SavedbyTextMessages,”
response has
to
to
l recently,IMhasevolvedlargelyunnoticedandindependentofanyformal
of such the a IETF based
an major includ open access
SinceIMisoftenafreeserviceofferedtoattractuserspurchaseother with phone
(IETF)
the
certain to in guide a means the
DuringtheSeptember11,2001terroristattacks,manypeopleturnedto
concerns “FCC
instant
exact team same
in telecommunicationsservicesregulatedbytheFCC.Consequently
w 1999
in potential
as
IM issued between
ho wanttoassuretheirabilityenterintocertainmarketsforservices.
IM larger on
e AOLInstantMessenger(AOLIM),ICQ(“ISeekYou”),Yahoo text to the
Internetaccess,therehasbeennocommercialmarkettoregulate.
questi networks.
the
convened
industry-led may a
software the May users to to
accountin application.
future
messaging growing messagin
development define a and
that controver have reported communicate
on beingdebatedatthistimeiswhetherthereshouldbe
be to
minimum Open
diff has
evolve of located in accessibility beenraisedmostlybyadvocateswhowishtomaintainthe AOLreporteda20%jumpininstantmessagingvolume,
erent IMapplications.Atthepresent,thereisnotechnical
the
programs
the
helped
IM
order concern g ofthenumberpeopleusingIMapplicationsisnot AOL g andInternet-basedinstantmessagingtogetaroundthe
system Forexample,anindividualcannotuseAOL IMto
standards, Instant
protocols number sy overinteroperability,twointer-relatedissuescanbe as
from 12 set
in
a to
Messaging of draw
service. different of
discreetly over
communicate
IM [http://www.ietf.org/overview.html]. such as
the Messaging
. Openaccessconcernshavebeenraisedmostly
requirements CRS-4 of
more
simple and
applications. each
the users, Second,theadvancedtechnicalcapabilities
areas Center,” data lack file
11 competitors
compa
with exchange
some and transfers
of formats
of with
in standards,
Presence the ny developsitsIMproductsasit colleagues Wall Unlikee-mailprograms,which ofthemostcommonlyusedIM
a
another user,bothpeoplemust Request
country
of necessary
and into Street Washington Techway
text
Protocol
voice the the
messages
Jo For or during
field, Internet urnal
the to messaging
Comments
develop
Working
world. meetingsand heightening , 13September
to
InFebruary Engineering
something First,the IMalso
a , 1 suggest
widely Group (RFC)
the http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RS20688 claimed [http://www.fcc.gov/csb/aoltw/resp626.txt]. its IMtechnologyatnocosttooveradozencompanies of that without thepermissionofAOL.InitsJune26,2000responsetoFCC,AOLstated have compatibility IM. enabled 2000 communicate has 10.3millionusers. has 9.1millionusers,YahooMessenger10.6million ( In accounts. accounts. Although 16 16 November2000,p.E9. 14 1 January2000,p.17. Wall of IM programs,AOLand Warner [http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2871202.html]. ICQ Members aNewHome:AIM,” [http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,18853,00.html]; 15 2000, A3 o Open Access. approved bytheIETF. tentatively c and 13 information,”(the considering. IETF individuals ommunicate usingdifferentsystems.Itisuncleariftheinteroperabilityprotocol, pen JillCarroll,“FCCMayOpenAOLMessagingCenter,”
Ariana Jennifer
Ben protecting regi contrast,
Althoughitwasreportedthesetestsweresuccessful,AOLhasnotextended
continued it
Although
At Street tried
access it has has Hammer, stered accounts
individuals this
was that will Eunjung
14 Thenextmost-popularprogramisMicrosoftMessenger,with18million
DiSabatino,
since estimates blocked to
called Thesenumbersalsoincludesmultipleaccountscreatedbythesamepeople.
Journal usingtheserviceduring
time,
TheIETF’sreviewisfocusingontheprotocols’abilitytoprovide“presence
engineer forallusersbeyondthistestphase. discovered and the
the provide Media with
to narroweddownalistoftenproposalstothreeprotocolsthatitisactively AOL “AOL
Cha,
computer
the plan
is AOL review
ability
these
AOL to
reports
related The debateoverIM vary
submitted Common
Metrix
“Task
“Yahoo, use their Links access 15 was
, whichmayornotactuallybeusedinanygivenmonth,the 13 IM
unauthorized
that IM the
depending to their
and
products
that security not
Force to
Instant
locate ICQ,
users). var estimates
AOL
to MSN
Profile
the ICQ ICQ
a detailed ICQ
ious industry-proposedprotocolsandsuggestions.The
plan Time Focusing
are
original
Messenger
other
However,itwaswidelyreportedthatinSeptember
username had and Challenge are
on has so
a
for for both ownedbyAOL.Basedontheglobalnumber attempts
given
they
Warner’s the not
privacy that conducted
73 e
interoperability CRS-5 interoperability Presence nough anddidnotcommitAOLtoaspecific users
on
concerns million measurements compatible
can
IM time C
Service AOL AOL and
NET
to who
of interface Interoperability
password
access 1 high period,
its
researchanddevelopmentteststhat accounts 6 in and
SinceJuly1999,severalcompanies IM
s,”
are over Instant users. News.com
Instant with
speed The Standard W
has focuses users, online) to its
with
all only beingcountedonce),ICQ whether used,
AOLalsosaidithaslicensed
the
user each Messaging,” to and
Street 21.5
Messaging cable the log
, Protocol,” and MicrosoftMessenger
IETF
Jim
AOL
two
database as primarily other
26 AOL on
mil Journal Hu, a
well
, 26September2000,
lines
of in
and merged IM lion uniqueusers
(ICQ September
“AOL
June the IM Washington
as
Computerworld
has chat (CPIM),
on , t on
o rivalISPs. user most 13 the
users
2000,
the 65.5 ‘Test’
the AOL-T
using September
ability
database
grounds popular issue of
million cannot
will
critics 2 Gives
Post AOL 000, ime
be to , , http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RS20688 18 17 evolving companies, Services user interoperability regarding is represents [http://www.nad.policy.net/proactive/newsroom/release.vtml?id=18761]. method fordeaf-to-deafanddeaf-to-hearingcommunication developing July 2000,C9. 19 for TransferofControl,CS DocketNo.00-30,”27,July2000,p.168-169. IM interoperabilityandaccessabilityinthelargercontextoftheseotherissues. and/or Options forCongress open standardsandinteroperability. (TTYs). Theyadvocatethat marginalized telephony Telecommunications deaf, Accessibility. standards forIManddirectsmostofitscriticismatAOL. Schuler’s and timetable organization compatible withAOLIMbeforebeingblockedbyasevidenceoftheirposition. “AmericaOnlineBacksWorld MessageStandards,”
Barry LaurieJ.Flynn, “AOL’s a
much perform authentication.
To Severa such
e-business
Schuler,
Barry and date
for claim, easier over as
a
instant an l companiescriticalofAOL’sapproachtoIMjoinedtogetherforman
broadband
necessary could
called quality in the
cooperating interoperable there
Schuler
“En terms could
the
and
noting National
services.
be
The
messaging. IntestimonytotheFCCinJuly2000,PresidentofAOLInteractive banc FreeIM.
quickermeanstocommunicatecomparedusingtexttelephones Internet. have
testing.
for
a of impact
stated
new a
accessibility competition,
lternative forcommunicationinthefaceofgrowthvoice Hearing Internet the their
Rivals
been Consequently,Congressmaydecidetorevisitconcernsabout Association
with
platform
IM FreeIMisastrongadvocateforthedevelopmentofopen Deaf, 18
TheybelieveIMisimportantsothatthedeafarenot
that IM technologyshouldbedevelopedundertheprinciplesof Inresponse,someinstantmessagingcompetitorsrefute other previous However,theoutcomeofeffortstoachieveIM
system
no on
Want other accessibility.
it Inc.).
America
would
hearings Internet
i
for ssue hasbeenraisedprimarilybyadvocatesforthe
and
to
but of companies. Accordingtotheseorganizations,IMisacritical
successes
providing See CRS-6 thedigitaldivide.IMtechnologyisrapidly theDeaf(NAD)andTDI(formerlyknownas
take
it Online,
-related issuessuchasthemergerofmedia
Open must o AdvocatesforthedeafalsoarguethatIM r billsintroducedinthe107
over
Instant address videoconferencing, Inc. 17 in New YorkTimes
a AOLhasstatedthatitsupports
temporarily year
and
Messaging,”
Time to issues
fully
Warner,
of
develop making , 16June2000,C22.
security,
New
interactive
Inc.,
Theysuggestit
York the their Applications
privacy, t
h technology
Times Congress products
gaming,
, and
19 31