Labor & Employment Law Section | Lawnotes Summer 1994
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Newsletter of Labor & Employment Law Section • State Bar of Michigan LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAWNOTES Volume 4, No. 3 Summer 1994 WHITHER GOES THE DOUGLAS FRASER TO SPEAK AT "AFTER-ACQUIRED ANNUAL SECTION MEETING EVIDENCE" DOCTRINE? Retired International UAW President Douglas Fraser will be the featured speaker at the Annual Meeting of the By Johanna H. Armstrong Labor and Employment Law Section on Wednesday, Dickinson, Wright, Moon, Van Dusen & September 21, 1994 at the Pontchartrain Hotel in Detroit. Freeman Drawing on a lifetime of involvement in the labor movement and extensive study of labor relations issues, A recent trilogy of decisions by the U.S. Court of Fraser will share his views on and answer questions about Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has confirmed that the "after- the state of labor relations currently and into the next century acquired evidence" doctrine is firmly established and can During his presidency, Fraser led the UAW through operate as a complete bar to recovery by former employees some of the most difficult and innovative bargaining in the — at least unless and until the U.S. Supreme Court changes history of Big Three-UAW relations. He also held a seat on things. the Chrysler Corporation Board of Directors. Now a The rule has evolved in the Sixth Circuit to encompass Professor of Labor Studies at Wayne State University, both resume fraud prior to hire, and misconduct during Fraser also has been serving on a special three-person employment. Importantly, the existence of discrimination committee under appointment by Mayor Dennis Archer to is irrelevant to the application of the doctrine. So long as assist and advise the City of Detroit in collective bargaining resume fraud influenced a hiring decision, or subsequently with unions representing its employees. discovered misconduct was egregious enough to warrant Fraser's address will conclude the Annual Section discharge, the allegedly discriminatory act is totally Dinner, which will begin at 6:30 p.m. at the Top of the disregarded by the court and the employee is barred from Pontchartrain. Preceding the Dinner, the Section will host a obtaining any relief. social gathering for Section Members, also at the Top of the In Johnson v Honeywell Information Systems, 955 Pontch. Beginning at 5 :00 p.m. and continuing until 6:15, F.2d 409 (1992), the Sixth Circuit first embraced the it will feature complementary hors d'oeuvres and cocktails. after-acquired evidence doctrine, and found that The Section also will present a full afternoon misrepresentations on a resume were relied upon in the program, in the Versailles Room on the Lobby Level of the hiring decision and constituted cause to discharge the Pontchartrain. It will begin at 2:00 p.m. with the Section's employee — thus warranting the dismissal of state law Annual Business Meeting, including election of Section claims of age discrimination and wrongful discharge. officers and Council members. Although the case had unique facts that could have easily From 2:30 to 3:30, the focus will be on Work Force restricted its application, the Sixth Circuit extended its Reduction Issues, including discrimination, statutory reach in subsequent decisions. requirements, releases, disclosure, early incentive buyouts, In Milligan-Jensen v Michigan Technological insurance continuation, and other recent developments. Presenters will be Michael L. Pitt, of Pitt, Dowty and University, 975 F.2d 302 (1992), the second case in the McGehee, and Daniel Galant of General Motors. trilogy, the Sixth circuit dismissed a Title VII sex The afternoon program will continue with an discrimination action when it found that a material omission in-depth look at Privatization Issues, from 3:30 to 4:15, on the job application would have resulted in discharge. featuring presentations by and dialogue between Arthur R. Notably, the trial court did find discrimination and used the Przybylowicz, of White, Beekman, Przybylowicz, evidence of resume fraud to reduce damages by 50% and to Schneider & Baird, and Robert A. Boonin of Butzel Long, deny reinstatement; this baby-splitting approach was who both have been deeply involved in school privatization consistent with EEOC guidelines and several court rulings issues over the last year. outside the Sixth Circuit. But in Milligan-Jensen, the Sixth Wrapping up the afternoon seminar program will be a Circuit rejected this view by dismissing the case entirely — 45-minute, "nuts-and-bolts" discussion of Practical Issues emphasizing that the after-acquired evidence rule operates Under the Family and Medical Leave Act and the ADA. as a complete bar. Presenters will be Jeffrey Fraser, of Varnum, Riddering, Continued on page 3 Continued on page 2 DOUGLAS FRASER TO SPEAK AT INDEX ANNUAL SECTION MEETING — Continued from page 1 Whither Goes The "After-Acquired 1 Evidence" Doctrine? Schmidt & Howlett; John G. Adam, of Miller, Cohen, Douglas Fraser To Speak At Martens, Ice & Geary; and Kristine J. Galien, of Blue Annual Section Meeting 1 Cross-Blue Shield of Michigan. Council Announces Law Student There is no charge for the afternoon program or social Writing Competition 2 hour. The price for dinner, featuring an entree choice Editor's Note: The "After-Acquired Evidence" Saga Continues ... 3 between baked swordfish and prime rib, will be $35. Look U.S. Supreme Court Review 4 for registration materials in the August issue of the Michigan Bar Journal. Michigan Supreme Court Update 4 MERC Update 6 NLRB: Summer Update 7 COUNCIL ANNOUNCES LAW STATEMENT OF EDITORIAL POLICY STUDENT WRITING Labor and Employment Lawnotes is a quarterly COMPETITION newsletter published under the auspices of the Council of the Labor and Employment Law Section of the The Council of the Labor and Employment Law Section State Bar of Michigan as a service to section members. has initiated an Annual Student Writing Competition for Views expressed in the articles and case commentar- students at the five Michigan law schools, featuring cash ies appearing herein are those of the authors, not the awards and publication of winning articles in this Council, the Section or the State Bar at large. We newsletter. encourage Section members and others interested in The competition will be invitational in nature, with labor and employment law to submit articles and entries invited from two students at each law school selected letters to the editor for possible publication. Please by faculty who teach labor and employment law there. An send them to the editor at 320 N. Main St., Suite 400, invited student may take as the subject of his/her article any Ann Arbor 48104. one of four topics announced by the Council or (with approval of a Council member) a narrower sub-topic. Paul E. Glendon, Editor Students invited by their faculty to participate in the first annual competition are to give a commitment of partici- pation by October 1, 1994 and submit papers by January 31, COUNCIL DIRECTORY 1995. The papers will be reviewed by a panel of judges selected by the Council and results will be announced in Chairperson April 1995. The timetable for future years will be the same. Mary H. Job East Lansing The author of the paper ranked first by the judging panel Vice-Chairperson will receive a cash award of $1,500; authors of the second- Paul E. Glendon Ann Arbor and third-ranked papers will receive $1,000 and $500 re- spectively. The top three papers all will be published in Secretary LA WNOTES, subject to editorial exigencies. All partici- Paul M. Kara Grand Rapids pants will receive a certificate and an invitation to a Section Treasurer event. Ronald R. Helveston Detroit Special recognition goes to Council Members Stuart Council Israel and Roger McClow for their efforts in getting this new John F. Brady Detroit Section activity off the ground. Janet C. Cooper Detroit Leonard D. Givens Detroit YOUR INPUT NEEDED TOO! Ronald R. Helveston Detroit In order to keep publishing the kind of timely, informa- David J. Houston Lansing tive and thought-provoking material you've been reading in Stuart M. Israel South field for the past three and one-half years, we need Roger J. McClow Southfield LA WNOTES your help. Section members are encouraged to submit Virginia F. Metz Detroit articles (on subjects of their own choosing) for possible Detroit Theodore R. Opperwall publication or to volunteer to write updates on reported H. Rhett Pinsky Grand Rapids cases in the various courts that impact the labor and employ- Robert E. Proctor Lansing ment law practice, from the U. S. Supreme to the local Arthur R. Przybylowicz Okemos Circuit. You may have noticed an absence of legislative Kenadall B. Williams Flint updates in the last few issues, due to a career change by the Ex-Officio person who so ably furnished them until then. We're also John P. Hancock, Jr. Detroit Continued on page 3 2 WHITHER GOES THE "AFTER-ACQUIRED EDITOR'S NOTE: THE EVIDENCE" DOCTRINE? — Continued from page I "AFTER-ACQUIRED EVIDENCE" SAGA CONTINUES . .. In the third case, McKennon v Nashville Banner Publishing Co., 9 F.3d 539 (1993), the Sixth Circuit held As this issue of LAWNOTES was about to go press, the S that general misconduct during employment also operates Third Circuit Court of Appeals weighed in with its view of as a complete bar to any recovery. The employer discovered the proper uses and effects of "after-acquired evidence" in that the discharged employee-plaintiff had secretly copied employment discrimination litigation. In Marde// v and taken confidential documents prior to her discharge. Harleysville Life Insurance Co., CA 3, No. 93-3258 The employee contended that she could see the "writing on (8/2/94), reported in BNA's Daily Labor Report on August the wall" and took the documents only to defend against 8, the court held that "after-acquired evidence is discriminatory discharge.