Lagunitas Creek Watershed Citizen Water-Quality Monitoring Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lagunitas Creek Watershed Citizen Water-Quality Monitoring Program SALMON PROTECTION AND WATERSHED NETWORK a project of Turtle Island Restoration Network P o s t O f f i c e B o x 4 0 0 • F o r e s t K n o l l s , C A 9 4 9 3 3 P h o n e : 4 1 5 - 4 8 8 - 0 3 7 0 • F a x : 4 1 5 - 4 8 8 - 0 3 7 2 E m a i l : S p a w n @ S p a w n U S A . o r g W e b : w w w . S p a w n U S A . o r g Lagunitas Creek Watershed Citizen Water-Quality Monitoring Program The Salmon Protection and Watershed Network’s (SPAWN) 2005/06 Water Quality Report Prepared by • Paola Bouley, SPAWN Watershed Biologist • Tom Yarish, SPAWN Water Quality Monitoring Field Crew Leader • Mike Lane, GIS Consultant • Joseph Kinyon, Biodiversity & GIS Database Manager Pacific Coast Science and Learning Center - National Park Service Volunteers and Field Crew: Keenan Lim (SPAWN intern), Richard Ferris, Anne Brown, Elizabeth Danel, Annette Krup, Ann Jones, Shannon Burke, Tom Yarish, Paola Bouley, Ariel Zucker (SPAWN Intern) June, 2006 Table of Contents Page • Introduction and Methods 2 o Sampling Periods and Sites 3 • Results and Discussion 4 • Appendices o Stream Flow Data – Source: USGS 9 ß Summer 2005 w/ sampling points ß Winter 2006 w/ sampling points o H20 Quality Data • Geometric Means with Watershed Map – Figure A: Summer 2005 and Figure B: Winter 2006 11 ß Daily values across all sites for Summer 2005 (Figures 1 - 8) 13 ß H20 Quality Data - Daily values across all sites for Winter 2005 (Figures 1 – 7) 21 2 Introduction The Salmon Protection and Watershed Network (SPAWN) in partnership with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and State Water Resources Control Board has assessed water quality in the Lagunitas Creek Watershed since 2003 as part of an effort to determine Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) for key pollutants. The Lagunitas Watershed is currently listed on the RWQCB 303(d), “Impaired Water Body List” because levels for certain pollutants (including sediments, nutrients, and fecal coliforms) exceed the State of California's water quality standards. The current program will locate source areas and evaluate current pollutant levels across the Watershed. Methods All sites were sampled according to protocols approved by SWRCB personnel and outlined in SPAWN’s "Lagunitas Watershed Citizen Water Quality Monitoring Program Volunteer Manual." Trained water quality monitoring volunteers collected water samples for lab analysis. Physical data (temperature, salinity, pH) were also collected using portable field equipment. All water samples were collected between 09:00 and 13:00 hours. Lab samples were delivered to Sequioa Analytical labs for analysis of fecal coliforms, nitrates, and orthophosphates. Sampling Periods and Sites Summer 2005 Sampling Schedule: Seven sites were sampled for all parameters listed below on August 2nd, 9th, 16th, 23rd, and 30th. See Appendix, Figure A. Samples on Devil’s Gulch Creek (ID = “DG”) were only collected on August 23rd and 30th. Fecal coliform samples were also collected once a week over a six-week period beginning August 2nd to September 6th at all sites except for Site #29b Sampling Sites ((Numbers indicate RWQCB site identification codes provided by Farhad Godhrati): Fecal Coliforms, Nitrate + Nitrite and Orthophosphates • WS-19 Woodacre Creek • WS-23 San Geronimo Creek at the Inkwells • WS-24 Lagunitas Creek below Devil's Gulch Creek • WS-20 San Geronimo Creek at Roy's Pools • WS-22 Arroyo Creek • DG Devil’s Gulch • WS-26 Oklahoma 3 Physical Parameters: DO, TDS, Temperature, pH, Conductivity • WS-19 Wood acre Creek • WS-23 San Geronimo Creek - Inkwells • WS-24 Alginates Creek below Devil's Gulch Creek • WS-20 San Geronimo Creek at Roy's Pools • DG Devil’s Gulch • WS-26 Tocaloma Winter 2005/06 Sampling Schedule: Nine sites were sampled along with spot sampling at 4 other sites over for various parameters listed below on January 3rd, 10th, 17th, 24th, and 31st. See Appendix, Figure B. Sites WS-17, WS-18, WS-19, WS-20, WS-23, WS-24, and WS-26 (Tocaloma) were tested for all parameters. Sites WS-21 and WS-22 were not tested for the presence of nitrates and nitrites or ortho- phosphates (as determined in our protocols). An additional site at the mouth of Devil’s Gulch Cr. was sampled for all parameters on January 24th and January 31st. Following a major storm event, 3 sites were sampled on January 31st for all parameters except nitrates and nitrites and ortho-phosphates. These 3 additional sites are located at the intersection of Park St. and Redwood Dr., the intersection of Sir Francis Drake Blvd. and Two Park Rd., and Lagunitas Creek below Kent Lake Dam. No dissolved oxygen readings were recorded this winter due to equipment malfunction. Sampling Sites (Numbers indicate RWQCB site identification codes provided by Farhad Godhrati): Fecal Coliforms • WS-17 East Fork Woodacre Creek • WS-18 West Fork Woodacre Creek • WS-19 Woodacre Creek WS-20 San Geronimo Creek at Roy’s Pools • WS-21 Montezuma Creek • WS-22 Arroyo Creek • WS-23 San Geronimo Creek at the Inkwells WS-24 Lagunitas Creek below Devil's Gulch Creek • DG Devil’s Gulch Creek • WS-26 Lagunitas Creek at Tocaloma 4 Spot testing for fecal coliforms: • PS-1 Park Street and Redwood Drive • SGP-1 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Two Park Road • KENT Lagunitas Creek below Kent Lake Dam Nitrate + Nitrite and Orthophosphates • WS-17 East Fork Woodacre Creek • WS-18 West Fork Woodacre Creek • WS-19 Woodacre Creek • WS-20 San Geronimo Creek at Roy’s Pools • WS-23 San Geronimo Creek - Inkwells • WS-24 Lagunitas Creek below Devil's Gulch Creek • DG Devil’s Gulch Creek • WS-26 Lagunitas Creek at Tocaloma Sequoia Analytical Lab Analyses:. Fecal coliforms, nitrate + nitrites (NO3 + NO2), ortho-phosphates. SPAWN Field Measurements: pH, Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Conductivity (uS) Temperature (ºC). Data Analysis and Presentation: Geometric and arithmetic means for all parameters measured were calculated for all sites using Excel. Geometric mean data were plotted and integrated into a GIS project developed probono by Joseph Kinyon (GIS specialist at the Pacific Coast Science and Learning Center Staff) and updated and improved by Mike Lane (GIS consultant). Streamflow data were obtained from the Lagunitas Creek stream gauge in Samuel P. Taylor State Park operated and archived by the USGS National Water Information System (http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/ca/nwis). Rainfall data for Kent Lake were obtained from Eric Ettlinger at the Marin Municipal Water District. Results Fecal coliform levels have an acceptable recreational swimming level of 200 MPN/100mL. There are currently no established limits for nitrates and orthophosphates in the Lagunitas Creek Watershed. Furthermore, there are no data on standards for conductivity, pH, 5 temperature and dissolved oxygen. Therefore, these data will help to determine background levels in the Lagunitas Creek Watershed and ultimately help define limits for each parameter. Fecal Coliforms Results from our testing show sources of fecal coliforms to be the villages of Woodacre (East and West Fork and mainstem of Woodacre Creek, and San Geronimo at Roy’s Pools), and Lagunitas (San Geronimo Creek at the Inkwells, and Arroyo Creek). During the Summer of 2005, 30% of creeks sampled for fecal coliforms (and analyzed using the geometric mean) exceeded the State established limits for recreational swimming. These creeks were: • Woodacre Creek; and • Arroyo Creek. Woodacre Creek and San Geronimo Creek at the Inkwells exceeded State limits for fecal coliforms four out of the five days tested. Arroyo Creek exceed the limits for all five days tested. During the Winter of 2006, 40% of creeks sampled for fecal coliforms (and analyzed using the geometric mean) exceeded the State established limits for recreational swimming. These creeks were: • East Fork of Woodacre Creek; • Woodacre Creek; • San Geronimo Creek at Roy’s Pools; and • San Geronimo Creek at the Inkwells. The highest level of fecal coliforms observed in 2005/06 (1,600 MPN/100 mL) occurred on East Fork Woodacre Creek (WS-17), Woodacre Creek (WS-19), and the Inkwells (WS-23) on San Geronimo Creek during the winter of 2006. Woodacre Creek exceeded State limits for fecal coliforms three out of five days tested. San Geronimo Creek at Roy’s Pools exceeded State limits for four out of five days tested. Nitrates and Orthophosphates Nitrates and orthophospates showed similar trends over the spatial and temporal range sampled. We observed a decreasing trend away from the more urbanized villages, i.e. values declined as we sampled further away from the more densely populated areas of the San Geronimo Valley. The highest levels of nitrates (1.8 mg/L) were detected at Woodacre Creek (WS-19) during the winter of 2006. The highest level of orthophosphates (0.086 mg/L) were detected at Woodacre Creek during the summer of 2006. 6 Temperature Temperature did not exceed the upper incipient lethal temperature (26.6 ºC, Brett, 1952), or critical thermal maxima (24.6 ºC, McGeer et al.1991) either in winter or summer sampling. Except during the 1st week of sampling in January 2006 (see East Fork Woodacre, Arroyo, Devil’s Gulch, Tocaloma), temperature did not exceed a maximum of 9-12 ºC during the winter sampling period, a range considered to be optimal for pre-emergent stages of coho ºC (Hicks (2000). Temperatures in excess of optimal growth ranges for coho were detected during the summer sampling period (12-14° C (Brett, 1952); 10-15.6° C (Armour, 1991); 9-13° C (Stein et al 1972)). See Appendix - Daily values across all sites for Summer 2005 (Figures 1 - 8) See Appendix, H20 Quality Data plots for time-specific values for all parameters measured.
Recommended publications
  • San Geronimo Golf Course Invasive Species Management Plan Page 2
    San Geronimo Golf Course Invasive Species Management Plan Prepared by Preston Brown, SPAWN Fisheries Intern Ssssssssssssssssss Salmon Protection And Wa ters hed Salmon Protection And Watershed Network Netwo rk PO Box 370 • Forest Knolls, CA 94933 PO Box 4 00 • F orest Ph. 415.663.8590 • Fax 415.663.95 Knolls, CA 94933 www.SpawnUSA.org This page intentionally left blank SPAWN: San Geronimo Golf Course Invasive Species Management Plan Page 2 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…....6 Lagunitas Coho and Steelhead…………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….….6 San Geronimo Creek Headwaters……………………………………………………………………………………………….6 Salmon Protection and Watershed Network (SPAWN)…………………………………………………….……..…9 San Geronimo Hydrologic Conditions……………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Biology and Natural History of Invasive Species…………………………………………………………………………………..….12 Largemouth bass……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..….12 Black crappie……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….13 American bullfrog ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….13 Parrot’s feather…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..14 Effects of Invasive Species on Native Salmonids……………………………………………………………………………………….14 Status of Invasive Species at Golf Course Ponds………………………………………………………………………………………15 American bullfrog………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..15 Parrot’s feather…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..18 Largemouth bass and black crappie……………………………………………………………………………………………18 Additional
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Supervisors- Attached Please Find Our Letter of Opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow As Drafted by Our Attorne
    From: Andrea Taber To: Rice, Katie; Kinsey, Steven; Adams, Susan; Arnold, Judy; Sears, Kathrin Cc: Dan Stein; Thorsen, Suzanne; Lai, Thomas Subject: Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association Letter of Oppostion to the SCA Ordinance Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:12:53 PM Attachments: Document4.docx Dear Supervisors- Attached please find our letter of opposition to the SCA Ordinance for Sleepy Hollow as drafted by our attorney Neil Moran of Freitas McCarthy MacMahon & Keating, LLP. Sleepy Hollow Homeowners Association May 3, 2013 Board of Supervisors of Marin County 3501 Civil Center Drive San Rafael, CA 94903-4157 Re: Stream Conservation Area (SCA) Proposed Amendments to the Development Code Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors: INTRODUCTION The Sleepy Hollow Homes Association (SHHA) objects to the proposed changes to Chapters 22.33 (Stream Protection) and 22.63 (Stream Conservation Area Permit) as they would apply to the residents of the unincorporated portion of San Anselmo known as Sleepy Hollow. We ask that the County exempt and/or delay implementation of any changes to Chapters 22.33 and 22.63 as to the city-centered corridor streams, including Sleepy Hollow. The SHHA supports implementation of the proposed amendments to the San Geronimo Valley, to protect wildlife habitat in streams where Coho Salmon currently exist. The SHHA supports regulations to ensure the health and survival of the species in these areas. The SHHA recognizes the urgency of this matter to the San Geronimo Valley, both for the survival of the endangered and declining Coho population and for the property rights of the affected residents who are currently subject to a building moratorium.
    [Show full text]
  • Lagunitas Creek Floodplain and Riparian Enhancement Design
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation May 26, 2016 LAGUNITAS CREEK FLOODPLAIN AND RIPARIAN ENHANCEMENT DESIGN Project No. 16-020-01. Project Manager: Joel Gerwein RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $490,578 to Turtle Island Restoration Network to produce design plans, prepare permit applications and provide environmental compliance for restoration of floodplain coho salmon rearing habitat on a one mile reach of Lagunitas Creek, Olema, Marin County. LOCATION: Olema, Marin County PROGRAM CATEGORY: Integrated Coastal and Marine Resources Protection EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location Maps Exhibit 2: Site Photographs Exhibit 3: Project Letters RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Section 31220 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of an amount not to exceed $490,578 (four hundred ninety thousand five hundred and seventy-eight dollars) to Turtle Island Restoration Network (TIRN) to produce design plans, prepare permit applications and provide environmental compliance for a floodplain restoration project to improve coho salmon rearing habitat along a one mile reach of Lagunitas Creek floodplain near the community of Olema, Marin County, subject to the condition that prior to the disbursement of any funds for the project, TIRN shall submit for the review and approval of the Conservancy’s Executive Officer a workplan, schedule and budget, and the names and qualifications of any contractors for the project.” Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: “Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal Conservancy hereby finds that: Page 1 of 12 LAGUNITAS CREEK FLOODPLAIN AND RIPARIAN ENHANCEMENT 1.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS OCTOBER 2005 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCE OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COAST COHO SALMON EVOLUTIONARILY SIGNIFICANT UNIT Brian C. Spence Scott L. Harris Weldon E. Jones Matthew N. Goslin Aditya Agrawal Ethan Mora NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-383 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), organized in 1970, has evolved into an agency which establishes national policies and manages and conserves our oceanic, coastal, and atmospheric resources. An organizational element within NOAA, the Office of Fisheries is responsible for fisheries policy and the direction of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). In addition to its formal publications, the NMFS uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series, however, reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. Disclaimer of endorsement: Reference to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of NOAA or the United States Government, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS This TM series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special purpose information.
    [Show full text]
  • Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning
    Scanned for KRIS State of California The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing LAGUNITAS CREEK, Marin County STREAM EVALUATION REPORT 86-2 APRIL 1986 IFIM study site near Tocaloma at about 35 cfs. IFIM study site near Gallager Ranch at about 22 cfs. ERRATA Page i Author Gary E. Smith2 Page 2 Paragraph 2, 14th line to Syncaris, it seems probable that the proposed summer and early Page 32 Recommendations, 3.a., first line If Nacasio Reservoir inflow during the preceeding month is Inside of back cover, photo caption, third line and deepened pools and Department of Fish and Game Stream Evaluation Report Report No. 86-2 Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County April, 1986 Gordon K. Van Vleck George Deukmejian Jack C. Parnell Secretary for Resources Governor Director The Resources Agency State of California Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, I/ By Gary E. Smith 2 Abstract The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology was used to assess steelhead and coho salmon spawning and rearing streamflow/habitat relationships and requirements in Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California. The annual flow regime developed considers individual species life stage needs. Approximately 37% of the average annual runoff is identified as being needed for spawning and rearing purposes. Typically, natural summer flows need augmentation and natural winter flows more than meet fishery needs. 1_/ Stream Evaluation Report No. 86-2, April 1986. Stream Evaluation Program. 2/ Environmental Services Division, Sacramento, California -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract...................................
    [Show full text]
  • COHO-FRIENDLY HABITAT and OPERATIONS PLAN for the San Geronimo Golf Course
    Final COHO-FRIENDLY HABITAT AND OPERATIONS PLAN For the San Geronimo Golf Course Prepared for June 2014 Salmon Protection And Watershed Network (SPAWN) Final COHO-FRIENDLY HABITAT AND OPERATIONS PLAN For the San Geronimo Golf Course Prepared for June 2014 Salmon Protection And Watershed Network (SPAWN) Funded by California Department of Fish and Wildlife and NOAA Fisheries, Fisheries Restoration Grant Program 550 Kearny Street Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94108 415.896.5900 www.esassoc.com Los Angeles Oakland Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego Santa Cruz Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 121008 OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. Introduction 1-1 1.1 Approach 1-2 2. Background 2-1 2.1 Physical Setting and Landuse History of the San Geronimo Valley 2-1 2.2 Geomorphic Setting 2-4 2.3 Hydrologic Setting 2-11 2.4 Salmonid Utilization 2-14 2.5 Previous Work 2-19 3. Habitat Restoration & Management 3-1 3.1 Riparian and Floodplain Habitat Assessment 3-1 3.2 Large Woody Debris Assessment 3-18 3.3 Salmonid Barrier Assessment 3-31 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Lagunitas Creek Watershed Sediment Reduction And
    CONSOLIDATED PROPOSAL FOR COASTAL NONPOINT SOURCE PROJECTS (GRANT AGREEMENT NO. 04-155-552-2) FINAL PROJECT REPORT Prepared by Marin Municipal Water District Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed Friends of Novato Creek Southern Sonoma County Resource Conservation District Sonoma Ecology Center In partnership with North Bay Watershed Association May 2008 Acknowledgements The following individuals and consultants provided valuable review, comments, construction and oversight of the various project elements and studies completed under this project: Consultants and Contractors Pacific Watershed Associates Harold Appleton, Prunuske Chatham, Inc. Kathie Lowrey, Prunuske Chatham, Inc Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Sonoma Ecology Center County of Sonoma, GIS Dept. Laurel Collins, Watershed Sciences Gina Cuclis, Cuclis PR Funding for this project was provided by the State Water Resources Control Board under the Proposition 13 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Grant Program with matching funds and in-kind contributions from the North Bay Watershed Association, California State Coastal Conservancy, the California Department of Fish and Game, Marin Municipal Water District, Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed, Ross Valley Sanitation District, Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program, Town of San Anselmo, Marin Conservation Corps, Friends of Novato Creek, Southern Sonoma County Resource Conservation District, Sonoma Ecology Center, landowners and citizens in Petaluma & San Antonio Creek watersheds, and numerous volunteer efforts throughout the project area. Final Report Consolidated Concept Proposal for Nonpoint Source Projects, Greater San Pablo Bay Area Grant Agreement No. 04-155-552-2 Table of Contents Page A. Project Summary……………………………………………………………….. 1 B. Project Location ……………………………………………...………………… 2 C. Project Performance …………………….…………………………….…...… 7 1. San Anselmo Creek Park: Riprap Removal and Restoration Project Planning and Implementation…………………………..…… 7 Project Performance..………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT City of Santa Cruz Habitat Conservation Plan Conservation
    DRAFT City of Santa Cruz Habitat Conservation Plan Conservation Strategy for Steelhead and Coho Salmon August 10, 2011 DRAFT HCP Fisheries Conservation Strategy Page 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Approach to the Conservation Strategy .................................................................................... 10 3. Biological Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................. 13 4. Avoidance and Minimization Measures ..................................................................................... 15 4.1. Water Supply Operations ...................................................................................................... 15 4.1.1. Water Diversions ............................................................................................................ 15 4.1.1.1. Minimizing the effects of City Diversions ............................................................. 16 4.1.1.2. Rationale for Developing Instream Flow Targets ............................................... 18 4.1.1.3. Liddell Spring Diversion .......................................................................................... 21 4.1.1.4. Reggiardo Creek Diversion .................................................................................... 24 4.1.1.5. Laguna Creek Diversion ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Guide 2017
    50th 1 Anniversary Community Guide 2017 Copyright © 2017 San Geronimo Valley Community Center All stories, articles, photographs, images, and poems are copyright of their respective creators as indicated herein, and are reproduced here with permission. Printed in the United States of America by McNaughton & Gunn Printed on recycled paper Publisher: San Geronimo Valley Community Center Editor: Barbara S. Brauer Photo Editor: Anne McClain Design & Production: David Russ Cover Design: Anne McClain Page Footers: Anne McClain, Molly Edwards, Fred (Lee) Berensmeier Lagunitas School Map: Anne McClain Valley Map: Fred (Lee) Berensmeier Spanish Translation: Victor Reyes, Nicole Ramirez Advertising Sales: Larry Rippee Funding: County of Marin Community Service Grant; Marin Municipal Water District; and San Geronimo Valley Community Center Community Guide Editorial Committee: Barbara S. Brauer, Chair, Jean Berensmeier, Dave Cort, Don Holmlund, Anne McClain, Alexander McQuilkin, Larry Rippee, Diana Rocha, David Russ, Suzanne Sadowsky, and Margo Schmidt Proofreaders: Jean Berensmeier, Barbara S. Brauer, Roberta Floden, Michel Kotski, Anne McClain, Suzanne Sadowsky and Margo Schmidt Acknowledgments We owe a deep debt of gratitude to all the many community members who shared the stories, photos, and memories that so enrich this Community Guide. We would particularly like to thank the following individuals who responded so gener- ously to our requests for materials: Bob Baker, John Beckerley, Jean Berensmeier, Paul Berensmeier, Frank Binney, Lau- rence
    [Show full text]
  • UCCE. the Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project
    Final Report of The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project November, 1995 Prepared by University of California Cooperative Extension 1682 Novato Boulevard, Suite 150B, Novato, CA 94947 With Funding From Marin Community Foundation Production of this report was made possible by a grant from The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project Project Coordinators Ellen Rilla Stephanie Larson Principal Writer and Photographer Lisa Bush Historical Profiles Dewey Livingston Water Quality Information n Oli l Pau Design Lisa Krieshok Typesetting Nan Perrott The University of California, in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws and University policy, does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, medical condition (cancer-related), ancestry, marital status, citizenship, sexual orientation, or status as a Vietnam-era veteran or special disabled veteran. The University also prohibits sexual harassment. Inquiries regarding the University's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to the Affirmative Action Director, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3560 (510) 987-0096. Final Report of The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project November, 1995 Prepared by n Extensio e Cooperativ a Californi f o y Universit 7 9494 A C , Novato , 15OB e Suit , Boulevard o Novat 2 168 With Funding From Marin Community Foundation Acknowledgments The Marin Coastal Watershed Enhancement Project has been the work of many dedicated indi- l environmenta d an , agencies e resourc l natura , community l agricultura e th g representin s vidual d an s meeting g attendin y b d participate t tha s landowner y man e th o t l gratefu e ar e W .
    [Show full text]
  • Woodacre – San Geronimo Wastewater Recycling Study
    . Draft Project Report Woodacre – San Geronimo Wastewater Recycling Study Prepared for: Marin County Community Development Agency Environmental Health Services Division 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 236 San Rafael, California 94903 By: Questa Engineering Corporation 1220 Brickyard Cove Road, Suite 206 Point Richmond, California 94801 DRAFT March 2017 All County publications are available in alternative formats (Braille, Large Print, or CD), upon request. Requests for accommodations may be made by calling (415) 473-4381 (Voice) 473-3232 (TDD/TTY) or by e-mail at [email protected]. Copies of documents are available in alternative formats, upon request. Draft Project Report Woodacre San Geronimo Wastewater Recycling Study Marin County, California Prepared for: Marin County Community Development Agency Environmental Health Services Division 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 236 San Rafael, California 94903 Prepared by: Questa Engineering Corporation 1220 Brickyard Cove Road, Suite 206 Point Richmond, California 94801 Tel: 510.236.6114 Fax: 510.236.2423 www.questaec.com Questa Project no. 1600073 DRAFT March 2017 Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the State Water Resources Control Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a study regarding the feasibility of constructing a community sewer system and tertiary water recycling treatment facility for up to approximately 360 developed properties currently served by onsite wastewater systems (septic systems) in the San Geronimo Valley area of Marin County.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Streamflow and Sediment Effects on Juvenile Coho and Benthic Macroinvertebrates of Lagunitas Creek and San Geronimo Creek, Marin County, California
    Evidence of Streamflow and Sediment Effects on Juvenile Coho and Benthic Macroinvertebrates of Lagunitas Creek and San Geronimo Creek, Marin County, California Hydrology for Planners, LA 222 UC Berkeley May 18, 2009 Joanie Ball [email protected] Sibyl Diver [email protected] Jason Hwan [email protected] ABSTRACT Lagunitas Creek and San Geronimo Creek in Marin County, California provide some of the best habitat for endangered coho salmon ( Oncorhynchus kisutch ) in the southern part of their range, making it a priority for local and federal agencies to collect habitat and biological data throughout the watershed. For this paper, we synthesized numerous years of existing data, including flow, sediment conditions, endangered coho salmon densities, and one year (2001) of macroinvertebrate biological assessment data to investigate biotic and abiotic interactions among physical habitat, juvenile coho, and macroinvertebrates. We found that summer juvenile coho densities in Lagunitas Creek were negatively correlated with annual peak mean daily flow, whereas in San Geronimo Creek, variation in peak mean daily flow did not significantly impact juvenile density. Although macroinvertebrate prey were not limiting factors for juvenile coho in 2001, increased coho density was correlated with significant declines in the percentage of vulnerable macroinvertebrates at sampling locations. In addition, San Geronimo Creek had relatively high densities of juvenile coho, despite local evidence of excess nutrients and fecal coliforms from 2001. Analyzing fourteen years of qualitative sediment accumulation observations from Lagunitas tributaries, we found that 1) regular sediment inputs from tributaries could be impacting local habitat quality and may require source investigation, and 2) the highest sediment delivery occurred during wet years, but localized sediment accumulation may also occur in low flow years due to lag time in sediment delivery.
    [Show full text]