Combined Indigenous Peoples Plan and Resettlement Plan
August 2012
NEP: SASEC Road Connectivity Project
Halesi-Diktel Road
Prepared by Department of Roads for the Asian Development Bank.
i
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 24 September 2012) Currency unit – Nepalese rupee (NR) NR1.00 = $0.0116789685 $1.00 = NR85.624000
ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BMN – basic minimum need BPL – below poverty line CDC – Compensation Determination Committee CDO – Chief District Officer CoI – corridor of impact CSC – construction supervision consultant DAG – disadvantaged groups DAO – District Agriculture Office DDC – District Development Committee DFID – Department of International Development DFO – District Forest Office DLA – District Level Agencies DLRO – District Land Revenue Office DLSO – District Land Survey Office DP – displaced person EA – executing agency EM – entitlement matrix FGD – focus group discussion GDI – gender development index GESU – Geo-Environment and Social Unit GoN – Government of Nepal GRC – Grievance Redress Committee HD – Halesi-Diktel Road HDI – Human Development Index HH – household HPI – Human Poverty Index IEE – initial environmental examination LAO – land acquisition officer MHH – mid-hill highway MoPPWTM – Ministry of Physical Planning, Works & Transport Management NFIN – National Foundation of Indigenous Nationalities OM – operational manual PD – Project Director PIU – Project Implementation Unit PM – Project Manager PPTA – project preparation and technical assistance PSA – poverty and social analysis R&R – resettlement and rehabilitation RAP – resettlement action plan RCP – Road Connectivity Project RIP – Road Improvement Project RoW – right of way RP – resettlement plan SLC – Subproject Level Committee SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009 ii
SRCP – SASEC Road Connectivity Project SRO – Social and Resettlement Officer STEP – Subregional Transport Enhancement Project TOR – terms of reference TPPF – Transport Project Preparatory Facility VDC – Village Development Committee
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ha – hectare kg – kilogram km – kilometer m meter sq. m. square meter
GLOSSARY Acquisition – Acquisition of land and other assets for the purpose of development projects in accordance to prevailing Act (Land Acquisition Act 1977). Affected – Households at large within the project influence area households Ailani Land – The land that does not to belong to any individual. As per the prevailing legal provisions, all the Ailani land belong to Government of Nepal and no one can transact and use such land without permission of the Government. Government of Nepal can reclaim Ailani land anytime for any purpose. As per the prevailing legal system, there is no provision of compensation for the occupiers/encroachers of the Government land. However, in development projects there is practice of compensating for the crops grown and structures constructed in Ailani if the dwellers and cultivators belong to vulnerable groups. Bigha – Land measurement practiced in the southern plain area of the country, known as Terai. One Bigha is equivalent to about 6772.63 sq.m. There are other two sub-units under Bigha; Katha, and Dhur. One Kattha is about 336.63 sq.m. and one Dhur is about 16.93 sq.m. Twenty Dhur makes one Kattha, and twenty Kattha makes one Bigha. Business – Structure constructed for business purpose Structure Cadastral Map – Land record system in Nepal is based on cadastral mapping. It does not align with the topographical maps. Up-to 2028 VS (Nepali national date, which is approximately 57 years ahead than AD) cadastral maps used to be based on free sheet prepared based on manual field survey without reference of national grid. However, grid system in cadastral mapping has been started since 2028 VS. Based on information obtained from Topographical Survey Office, Ministry of land Reform and Management, till now 34 out of 75 districts have cadastral maps based on national grid and 38 districts still adopts free iii
sheet1. However, even in such 38 districts, national grid based cadastral maps have been developed for municipality and district headquarter area, mostly in the Terai districts. Chief District – The Chief Administrative Authority of the district. In Nepal, Officer (CDO) CDOs are assigned in all (75) districts. Among others, the responsibilities of the CDO also include managing and maintaining district administration, law and order situation, and implementing Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan for Government and development projects to be implemented in the district. Compensation – A formal representative body to be formed under the chair of Determination CDO as provisioned in Land Acquisition Act 1977. One of the Committee (CDC) tasks of CDC is also to determine compensation rate for the land and other assets to be acquired for development projects in the district. The other members to be involved in CDC includes representative from District Development Committee (DDC), District Land Revenue Office (DLRO) or District land Survey Office (DLSO), representative of the project, and representatives from District Level Agencies (DLA). There is also practice of involving two representative from project- affected families as observers. Corridor of Impact Minimum width of land required for the construction of roads (COI) with the provision of shoulder width, side drain plus safety zone on either side of the road. COI is generally within the RoW. Cut-off date – The Completion date of census survey to count the DPs and their affected business and assets. Ethnic – The Commonly known as untouchable in traditional Nepalese Occupational society. They belong to occupational and artisan group. Dalit Caste Groups Commission has defined dalit as, ―the community discriminated (Dalit) on the basis of caste and marginalized in terms of social, economic, educational, political and religious basis.‖
Dalits are further divided into different groups in accordance to socially prescribed occupations. For example, communities traditionally engaged in tailoring, or playing musical instruments, making shoes or communities involved in washing clothes, are given different family names in accordance to the type of traditional occupation they are involved with and they have their own social norms and taboos even within the dalits of different occupation. Disadvantaged – Women, dalit, indigenous/ethnic people, Madhesi, other deprived Groups (DAG) people including poor farmer, labour and vulnerable groups (such as physically and mentally disabled persons, women, aged persons, landless labour, below poverty level households etc) are considered as Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Groups (DAG). The Interim Constitution of Nepal-2006 opens safeguarding and protecting provisions to such groups.
1 Mechi Zone : Jhapa, Illam, Panchthar; Koshi Zone: Morang, and Sunsari; Janakpur Zone: Sarlahi, Mahottari, Dhanusha, Ramechhap, and Sindhuli; Narayani Zone: Rautahat, Bara, Parsa, Chitwan; Bagmati Zone: Kathmandu, Lalitpur, Bhaktapur, Dhading, Gandaki Zone: Tanahu; Dhaulagiri Zone: Myagdi, Mustang; Lumbini Zone: Nawalparasi, Kapulbastu; Rapti Zone: Dang; Bheri Zone: Banke, Bardiya, Surkhet; Karnali Zone: Jumla, Dolpa, Mugu, Humla; Seti Zone: Kailali;and Mahakali Zone: Kanchanpur and Dadeldhura iv
Displaced – In the context of involuntary resettlement, displaced persons persons are those who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/ or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of(i) involuntary acquisition of land, or ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. District – The district level administrative body existing in all (75) districts Development of the country to be represented by elected district level Committee (DDC) political leaders. District Land – The Government body responsible for collecting land revenues, Revenue Office formalizing land transactions, updating and maintaining land (DLRO) ownership records, and determining Government rates for different types of land in the district based on the transaction rate used by public and transaction revenue paid to DLRO. District Land – The Government body responsible for measurement, survey, Survey Office record keeping, managing, and updating land record and (DLSO) parcels by area in cadastral maps of the respective district. District Level – District Level Agencies (DLA) are the Government offices Agencies (DLA) stationed at districts under different ministries of central level. District Land Revenue Office (DLRO), District Land Survey Office (DLSO), District Agriculture Office (DAO), District Forest Office (DFO) are some the district level agencies. One of the major tasks of DLA is to provide effective sectoral services in each administrative district in close coordination with regional or central level offices concerned. Indigenous – Nepal indigenous/nationalities/tribal Act 2001 defines People (Aadibasi Ethnic/Indigenous People as; ―People having their own mother Janajati) tongue, distinct traditional values, and cultural identities, including social structure and written/non-written history are indigenous and nationalities population.‖ According to National Census 2001, in Nepal, there are 100 different social groups having over 92 languages representing 43 ethnic nationalities and covering 37.2% of the country's population. Further, the National Foundation of Indigenous Nationalities (NFIN) has declared 59 groups as ethnic nationalities. NFIN has classified these groups into five categories2 based on their population size and other Socioeconomic variables such as literacy, housing, land holdings, occupation, language, and area of residence.
A majority of ethnic/Indigenous people in Nepal is integrated into the mainstream and share common social, cultural, and economic value and opportunities. There is provision in the Interim Constitution of Nepal 2006 for the protection and
2 (i) Endangered Groups: Bankariya, Kusunda, Khusbadia, Raute, Surel, Hayu, Raji, KIPSSan, Lepcha, Meche (10) groups, (ii) Highly marginalized Groups: Santhal, Jhangad, Chepang, Thami, Majhi, Bote, Dhanuk (Rajbansi), Lhomi (Singsawa), Thudamba, Siyar (Chumba), Barmu, Danwar (12 groups), (iii) Marginalized Groups: Sunwar, Tharu, Tamang, Bhujel, Kumal, Rajbansi (Koch), Gangai, Dhimal, Bhote, Darai, Tajpuriya, Pahari, Dhokpya (Topkegola), Dolpo, Free, Magal, Larke (Nupriba), Lhopa, Dura, Walung (20 groups), (iv) Disadvantaged Groups: Jirel, Tangbe (Tangbetani), Hylmo, Limbu, Yakkha, Rai, Chhantyal, Magar, Chhairotan, Tingaunle, Bahregaunle, Byansi, Gurung, Marphali Sherpa (15 groups), (v) Newar, Thakali (2 Groups).
v
development of disadvantaged Indigenous Peoples (IPs) or Adivasi/Janajati. Temporary – Temporary business stall made of bamboo/wood/CGI fixing in Business the ground that need to be demolished for shifting Stall/Shed Movable Kiosk – Small business structures made of wood/CGI/bamboo/mud- wall or any material that can be moved or shifted from one place to another without demolishing Replacement – The open/fair market value of a project affected property to be Cost fixed by Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) in accordance to Land Acquisition Act 1977. Resettlement – Resettlement denotes the consequence that may occur due to acquisition of land and other assets as well as the entire process and activities related to acquisition and implementation of Resettlement Plan (RP) in accordance to prevailing Acts. Residential cum – Structure being used for both residential and business Commercial purposes. Structure Residential – Structure being used for residential purpose only. Structure Ropani – Ropani is the land measurement unit, officially practiced in hilly regions of the country. One Ropani of land is equivalent to approximately 508.74 sq. m. There are three sub-units under the measurement unit of "Ropani". They are; (a) Aana (31.80 sq.m.), (b) Paisa (7.49 sq.m.), and (c) Daam (1.99 sq.m.). Four Daam makes one Paisa; four Paisa makes one Aana; and 16 Aana makes one Ropani. Significantly – Person/households including vulnerable, encroachers/ Displaced/ squatters, having more than ten percent loss of their affected Person/ agricultural land, complete loss of residential structures, and Households business/ livelihood. Temporary – Land acquired temporarily by contractors for access road or acquisition storing the construction materials or for other construction related purposes through a negotiation or contractors with the land owners ensuring compensation for a specified (temporary) period Vikram Sambat – Vikram Sambat (V.S.) is followed as national year in Nepal, (V.S.) which is approximately 57 years ahead than A.D. Vulnerable – Displaced households having: (i) significant resettlement Households impact, (ii) disabled member, (iii) single women headed households, (iv) independent elderly persons above 60 years of age, (v) landless laborers, wage earners and people living below the poverty line. Ward – A cluster of settlements with certain number of households/population as determined by the Government. It is the lowest level administrative unit to be represented by elected local political leaders. As per the existing administrative system, each municipal local administrative area contains up-to 35 number of wards whereas it is only up-to 9 wards in the case of Village Development Committees (VDC).
NOTE In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. vi
This combined indigenous peoples plan and resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the ―terms of use‖ section of this website.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 1 A. General ...... 1 B. The Subproject ...... 3 C. Description of the Subproject Location ...... 4 D. Benefits and Impacts ...... 4 E. Project Components ...... 5 F. Measures Taken to Minimize Impacts ...... 6 G. Scope and Objective of Resettlement Plan ...... 6 H. Methods of Resettlement Impact Assessment ...... 6 II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ...... 8 A. Findings of Resettlement Census Survey ...... 8 B. Scope of Land Acquisition ...... 8 C. Present Use of Affected Land ...... 12 D. Loss of Income Generating Assets ...... 13 E. Loss of Structures ...... 14 F. Loss of Community Property Resources ...... 19 G. Resettlement Impact on Indigenous/Ethnic Peoples ...... 20 III. SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILE AND INFORMATION ...... 22 A. Profile of the Subproject Districts ...... 22 B. Profile of the Subproject Location ...... 24 C. Profile of the Displaced Households...... 25 D. Socio-Economic Profile of Displaced Indigenous People’s Households ...... 33 E. Extent of Impact on the Structures of IP Households and Relocation Scope ...... 36 F. Community Perception and Key Issues Raised ...... 39 IV. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION ...... 41 A. Consultation and Participation...... 41 B. The Stakeholders ...... 42 C. Public Consultation and Discussion ...... 42 D. Findings of the Public Consultation and Issues Discusses ...... 44 E. Key Issues Raised During Social Consultation ...... 45 F. Consultation and Dissemination with Indigenous People ...... 50 G. Scope of Further Consultation...... 52 H. Disclosure of RP ...... 52 V. GRIEVANCES REDRESS MECHANISM ...... 53 A. General ...... 53 B. Formation of Grievance Redress Committee ...... 53 C. Operational Mechanism ...... 54 VI. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...... 56 A. The Context ...... 56 B. Land Acquisition Act ...... 57 C. ADB Resettlement Policy ...... 57 D. Gaps between ADB and GON Resettlement Policy and Bridging Measures ...... 58 E. Resettlement Principles and Assistance for the Proposed Project ...... 60 F. Cut-off Date ...... 61 VII. ENTITLEMENTS ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS ...... 62 A. Entitlement Policy and Matrix ...... 62 B. Compensations Provisions ...... 62 C. Compensation for the Loss of Income Generating Assets ...... 62 viii
D. Additional Assistance to Vulnerable Groups ...... 63 E. Livelihood Assistance and Skill Development Training ...... 63 F. Temporary Employment in the Project ...... 63 G. Compensation for the Loss of Residential/Commercial Structures ...... 63 H. Loss of Cultural & Community Structures/Land/Facilities ...... 64 I. Unanticipated Adverse Impacts ...... 64 J. Relocation and Income Restoration ...... 64 VIII. RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION ...... 71 A. Need for Rehabilitation ...... 71 B. Rehabilitation Strategy ...... 71 IX. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN ...... 73 X. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT ...... 80 A. The Setup ...... 80 B. The Executing Agency ...... 80 C. The Project Implementation Unit ...... 80 D. The Subproject Office ...... 80 E. Construction Supervision Consultant ...... 81 XI. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITIES ...... 86 A. Implementation Schedule ...... 86 B. Key RP Implementation Activities ...... 86 C. Finalization of Resettlement Cost ...... 88 D. Compensation Distribution and Deed Transfer ...... 88 E. Management of Unclaimed Compensation ...... 89 F. Time Duration for Compensation Distribution ...... 89 XII. MONITORING AND REPORTING ...... 90 A. Monitoring and Reporting Need ...... 90 B. Monitoring in the Subproject ...... 90 C. Reporting Requirements ...... 94 D. ToR for External Monitoring and Budget ...... 94
LIST OF ANNEXES
Annex- 1 : Inventory of Affected Private Land Annex- 2 : Inventory of Affected Public Land Annex- 3 : Inventory of Affected Private Trees Annex- 4 : Inventory of Affected Private Structures Annex -5 : List of Vulnerable Households Annex- 6 : Minute of Public Consultation Annex- 7 : Cost Estimation of Affected Assets Annex- 8 : Compensation Cost for the loss of crops Annex- 9 : Cost Estimate for RP Implementation Annex-10 : ToR For External Monitoring Agency Annex-11 : Photographs Annex-12 : Sample of Cadastral Map with Road Alignment
ix
LAND CONVERSIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
Conversions Land in the project area is measured in ropani and smaller units such as aana, paisa and dam, while land in Terai District is usually measured in bigha and kattha. The various conversion rates used in this document are given below:
1 Ropani = 16 aana = 64 paisa = 0.05087 ha 1 Bigha = 13.3126 ropani = 20 kattha = 0.6773 ha 1 Hectare = 19.655 ropani = 1.47645 bigha Terminology Agricultural land in the project area is grouped into different types and classes. These, in turn, form the basis for the calculation of land taxes, with individual landholdings (area and class of land) recorded at District Land Revenue Offices. The main land types are khet, bari and kharbari. Khet is irrigated land (or land that can be easily irrigated), generally situated in valleys and mainly used for paddy rice and wheat production. Since it is mostly situated on hill slopes, Bari is not irrigated and mainly used for rain fed crop production. Kharbari is grassland used for harvesting of grasses for thatching, etc. Another category of rain fed land is Phako. Bari is generally classified as the land close to the house (residential food garden), while Phako is further away from the house. Both khet and bari/phako are subdivided into the following land classes: Abbal - class 1 land Doyam - class 2 land Sim - class 3 land Chahar - class 4 land
x
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. Project Description 1. The Project is funded by ADB and having two Parts A and B. The objective of Part A is to review the government’s Priority investment plan (2007 – 2016) for the development and management of strategic road network, discuss and identify with the department of Roads (DOR) about 900 Km of high priority road sections and carrying out combined feasibility study and detail engineering design, including minor structures and bridges which consist of: (i) Appropriate condition surveys (ii) Engineering design, specifications, bill of quantities, cost estimates, and bidding documents for improvement works. (iii) Economic Analysis (iv) Social and Environmental assessment (v) Bidding Documents (vi) Procurement Assistance etc. 2. Part-B involves capacity strengthening in PPP preparatory work and implementation with the objective of establishing an enabling environment. This includes: PPP sector diagnostic and sector map – reviewing legal, regulatory, and policy frameworks, assess institutional structures, conducting stakeholder consultation, and clarifying sector strategy and road map; identify and prepare at least one small scale pilot PPP project – assessing and selecting PPP options, defining procurement and bid evaluation process, and preparing bid package. Consulting Services for Part A which involves Preparation for Priority Roads Improvement Projects is having following phases Detailed Survey and Design: about 300 Km Feasibility Study and Detailed Survey & Design: about 200 Km Feasibility Study: about 400 Km 3. Following seven priority roads given in Table E.1 have been identified for improvements under detailed design part of the project.
Table E.1: Description of Roads Included in TPPF
S. No. Road Length (Km) Road Classification Feeder 1 Ramapur- Lumbini- Kakrahwa ( RK) 34.57 Road/Highway 2 Manthali- Ramechhap (MR) 13.35 Feeder road 3 Halesi-Diktel (HD) 35.433 Mid Hill Highway 4 Leguwaghat- Bhojpur (LB) 65.55 Mid Hill Highway 5 Lguwaghat- Tumlintar (Savakhola) (LT) 24.63 Feeder Road 6 EWH-Koshi Bridge- EWH (EE) 62.90 Asian Highway Mechipul- Chandragadhi- Birtamod 7 12.16 Feeder road (MB)
3 The length of the Subproject road (38 km) estimated during the feasibility phase has been fixed as 35.43 km by detail design. xi
B. The Subproject Area and Activities 4. The Subproject lies at Khotang district in Eastern Development Region (EDR) of the country, and Diktel is its headquarter. As per the detail design, the total length of the Subproject road is 35.43 km. The zero chainage starts from Giri tole located at 100 meter ahead from the Halesi temple and passes through the VDCs of Madevsthan, Salle, Arkhaule, Nunthala, Kharpa, Buipa, Bamrang, and ends at Diktel Bazaar. Halesi, Arkhaule Bazaar, Nunthala, Bamrang, and Diktel Bazaar are some of the key junction/market areas along the alignment route. There is a fair weather road across the proposed alignment having about six meters width. As the DoR aims to improve, the existing road to an intermediate lane road, additional land take is required to improve the existing road under the Subproject. 5. The Subproject road is a part of Hilepani-Diktel road (about 74.57 km) under the Mid-Hill Highway4. Hilepani-Halesi section (about 40 km) of the road is being improved as a single lane feeder road standard by Department of Roads, Road Improvement Project (RIP) with funding from the Exim Bank of India. Earlier the DFID funded Rural Access Programme (RAP) had opened a track between Hilepani and Diktel linking to Bhojpur.5 6. The DoR under the SASEC Road Connectivity Project (SRCP) intends to improve the remaining second part of the road (Halesi-Diktel section) with intermidiate lane bituminous road to connect the southwestern part of Khotang district to the district headquarter Diktel. As per the detail design, the total length of the road is 35.43 km and its available formation width is 6 meters. As planned by the detatil design, the alignment standard of the road contain 6.5 meters formation width excluding the side drain. 7. The major activities to be carried out in the Subproject road under SRCP include; (i) Pavement improvement, (ii) Minor widening, (iii) Additional roadside structures, (iii) Slope Protection works, (iv) Bioengineering works, and (v) Black top.
C. Project Benefits and Impacts
1. Benefits
8. The proposed Subproject road is expected to enhance the linkage of eight VDCs with 21 key settlements and provides several direct benefits to the people .Construction of this road is expected to play a very important role on uplifting the socio-economic conditions of local people due to economic diversification in the district particularly in the Subproject locations. Further, implementation of the Subproject is also likely to enhance socio-economic conditions of the people in the area and promote internal and external tourism in the Halesi Mahadevsthan temple area located at Hales. Some of the specific tangible benefits of the road improvement are mentioned below: Easy access to transportation facilities by reducing travel time and cost; Increase in the scope of economic, and tourism related activities; Increase in the scope of developing other infrastructure facilities; Increase the value of land; Economic diversification;
4 The Mid-Hill High Way links at least 23 hilly districts and 12 zones of Nepal. The road will connect the district viz. Panchthar, Dhankuta, Bhojpur, Khotang, Okhaldhunga, Udaypur, Sindhuli, Kavre, Bhaktapur, Kathmandu, Dhading, Chitwan, Tanahu, Kaski, Parbat, Baglung, Rukum, Surkhet, Jajarkot, Dailekh, Achham, Doti, Dadheldhura and Baitadi. The proposed 7.5 meter wide road will connect the several small and big cities viz. Panchthar, Basantapur, Hile, Bhojpur, Diktel, Ghurmi, Khurkhot, Nepalthok, Dhulikhel, Kathmandu, Mugling, Pokhara, Baglung, Musikot, Dailekh, Sanfebagar, Dadeldhura, and Jhulaghat on its way. The Department of Roads has established a separate division to look after the construction of the project at its department. 5 ADB TA 7411-NEP Road Connectivity Project, WSP-GEOCE, Inception Report, May 2010 xii
Employment opportunities to the local people during the construction phase
2. Negative Impacts
9. Based on the findings of census survey carried out in the month of July 2012 an estimated area of 19.44 ha private land and 12.2ha of Government land need to be acquired for implementing of the Subproject road which will affect about 914 private land parcels owned by 389 households and displacing about 2303 persons. Acquisition of land for the Sub project also likely to affect 106 numbers of structures. Therefore, the persons to likely to be displaced due to affect on structures have also been included in the total number of displaced persons of the project. A summary on affected assets and displaced households is given in Table E.2.
Table E.2: Summary of Affected Assets and Displaced Persons Description/Units Number /Percentage/Area Overall Summary Total Project Displaced Households (Number) 389 Total Project Affected Persons (Numbers) 2303 Average Family Size of the Displaced Households 5.9 Summary of affected Land Total Private Land Getting Affected (Ha) 19.4 Total Government (Aailani)Land Getting Affected (Ha) 12.2 Total 31.6 Summary of affected Structures Residential Assets (Structures) 73 Commercial Only 11 Residential Cum Commercial 20 Rental 2 Total 106 Summary of the Displaced Households by other Categories IP Households Being Displaced (Number) 177 Other Vulnerable Group Households Being Displaced 159 (Number) Number of Affected Tenants - Number of Affected Employees 3 Source: Census July 2012 [a] Of the total identified household having impact on their land only 242 households with 437 land parcels were verified during the census survey and the remaining 147 households owning 477 could not be verified (also see note below for detail):
Note: It is also to be noted that official land ownership record of the identified affected households could not be verified from District Land Revenue Office (DLRO) as some of the land ownership record in the districts were destroyed/burnt during the 10 years Maoist insurgency in the country. Nevertheless, of the total households having impact on their land, ownership record of 242 affected households were verified through the land ownership certificate brought by the displaced households and even from the record of District Land Survey Office, Diktel. For the remaining affected land parcels, as DLRO at project district has advised to carry out land measurement survey in the relevant sections of the Subproject road in order to delineate the non-verified project affected land parcels for preparing the official land record. However, all of displaced households having impact on their land were included in the census survey
xiii
10. Of the total household interviewed during the census (389 HHs) an overwhelmingly higher number (324 number) or 83.29% households have impact on less than 10% land out of their total land holdings and there are only two households (0.55%) losing more than 50% of land out of their total holdings. Similarly, 41 (10.54%) HHs has impact between 10-20%, and 20(5.14 %) HHs losing 20-30% land. Likewise, 1 (0.26%) HH losing between 30-40% and another 1 (0.26%) HH again losing 40-50% land out of their total holdings Table E.3. Table E.3: Number of Households Land by Percentage of Land Loss More VDCs Having Impact 10- 20- 30- 40- Total <10% on Land 20% 30% 40% 50% than HHs 50% Mahadevsthan 36 11 4 0 0 0 51 Salle 17 2 0 0 0 0 19 Arkhaule 93 14 6 1 0 2 116 Buipa 7 0 1 0 0 0 8 Nunthala 79 3 5 0 0 0 87 Kharpa 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 Bamrang 34 4 3 0 0 0 41 Diktel 48 7 1 0 1 0 57 Total 324 41 20 1 1 2 389 Percentage 83.29 10.54 5.14 0.26 0.26 0.51 100
Source: Census Survey July 2012 11. Implementation of the Subproject is also likely to have completely affected altogether one hundred six (106) structures owned by 88 households. Out of them 33 structures are used for commercial purposes and the remaining are residential. 12. The total displaced households also included 177 numbers of indigenous households having impact on their land and assets. However, separate IP plan for this Subproject road may not require as (i) the entitlement matrix of the resettlement plan provisions compensation and other associated allowances for their affected assets, (ii) They have alternative resources (land, structures, employment, business etc) to support/maintain their livelihood, and they do not maintain distinct way of life different from the normal social lifestyle and neither dependet on typical traditional sources of earning for their merely livelihood (like, fishing, hunting, collecting herbal plants) for their livelihood. Rather they are involved in different occupations including overseas employment as the other groups do. Besides, adequate attention will also be paid focusing to the IP households with respect to compensation and rehabilitation/relocation activities to be carried out during the implementation phase. D. Measures Taken to Minimize the Impacts 13. The Government of Nepal (GoN) has legally fixed 50 meters Right of Way (RoW) for the highways. In this sense, the standard RoW of the Mid-Hill Highway is also 50 meters. Being a part of the Mid-Hill Highway the Subproject road requires 50 meters RoW. However, the Government policy and guidelines, also suggest following most economical and practical way possible and making best use of appropriate technology while constructing the road. Accordingly, the technical design of the Subproject road has been carried out based on the Government design standard by: (i) utilizing the existing alignment, and (ii) acquiring land based on actual need for 6.5 meters formation width and 9 meters spare for side drain, likely resettlement impacts and traffic safety. In this sense, the resettlement impact of the Subproject has been minized as only small strips of land along the existing alignment need to be acquired for the Subproject road.
xiv
E. Stakeholder Consultation and Participation 14. The key stakeholders consulted in the course of preparing this RP are; (i) officials at DoR, and Project Directorate (ADB) at central level; and (ii) Officials of DoR Divisional Office, District Land Survey Office (DLSO), District Land Revenue Office (DLRO), District Development Committee, District Administration Office (DAO). Similarly, local community, DPs and their family members, local leaders, VDC representatives, and other key persons were also consulted at the Subproject location. 15. The people contacted for stakeholder consultation were informed about project and likely resettlement impacts and mitigation measures to be adopted under the Sub-project. They were also informed about the (i) process of assessing and finalizing resettlement impact during the detail design, (ii) process of compensation determination in accordance to the Land Acquisition Act 1977 and provisions of compensation and other assistance to be made in the entitlement matrix of the Resettlement Plan (RP) prepared under the Sub-project. The stakeholders involved in community consultation were, local community, DPs and their family members, local representatives of political parties, school eachers, business persons, women, and vulnerable groups. 16. Similarly, series of meetings and consultations will also be carried out in collaboration with the relevant stakeholders (e.g. district level agencies, local communities, DPs and other agencies), during the RP implementation phase. Besides, as an approach of maintaining the RP preparation and implementation process transparent, and to ensure further active involvement of stakeholders in consultation process during implementation phase project related information will be disseminated through disclosure of RP from the Department of Roads. F. Legal Framework 17. The resettlement principles adopted for this Subproject recognizes both the Land Acquisition Act 1977, and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009. The resettlement principles adopted in this project will provide compensation and resettlement assistance to all Displaced Persons (DPs) and their affected assets in accordance to Land Acquisition Act 1977 also considering other relevant Government Acts, policies and practices being adopted in the past and ongoing road projects. Based on the above policy features, the principles of Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) for this Project will entail the following: . The negative impacts of the Project will be avoided or minimized as much as possible; . Where the negative impacts are unavoidable, the DPs will be assisted on improving or regaining their standard of living. Vulnerable groups will be identified and assisted to improve their standard of living; . Land replacement/or cash compensation at replacement costs based on current market rate to the DPs subject to be fixed by CDC; . Cash compensation for all affected structures (residential/commercial/residential- cum-commercial and other structures) affected by the project at replacement cost subject to be determined by the CDC; . Assistance will be provided to the owners of affected structures and non-titleholders, who may incur loss of ability to maintain livelihood during relocation and resettlement; . Rehabilitation assistance i.e.; compensation for lost business and workdays (including employees) due to relocation and disruption of business enterprise. . Compensation and R&R assistance will be made in accordance with this policy before taking possession of the acquired lands and properties; . Appropriate mechanism will be established both at the district and local level to ensure speedy resolution of grievance and disputes; xv
. All activities related to resettlement planning, implementation, and monitoring will be ensured through involvement of women, other vulnerable and DPs. G. Entitlements, Assistance and Benefits 18. This part reviews the policy framework that applies to the project. Land Acquisition Act (LAA) 1977, compatible with the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009, guides the resettlement Plan (RP). According to The Land Acquisition Act 1977(B.S. 2034) if the Government of Nepal (GoN) or any party acquire portion of land of the public, it should pay either compensation or on the negotiation for public purposes and works. The RP has provisioned of compensations to the DPs for all types of losses. In addition to the compensation for affected assets, the DPs will also receive other cash grants and resettlement assistance such as; shifting allowance, loss of workdays, income restoration, and additional financial assistance to the vulnerable DPs; such as household headed by women, disabled persons, ethnic groups, and household living below poverty level. The DPs under the project will be compensated at full replacement cost based on current market price to be determined by Compensation Determination Committee (CDC). Some of the key provisions made in the entitlement matrix are: . Compensation for Land Acquisition: One time cash compensation to the acquired private lands (agricultural, residential, commercial, forestry and others), in accordance to the provision in Land Acquisition Act 19776. Compensation will be given at local market value/replacement cost to be determined by CDC. Permanent tenants/sharecroppers will receive 50% cash compensation for the loss of tenancy due to acquisition of land. All the fees, taxes incurred in the relocation will be borne by the project; . Loss of Income by Agricultural Crops, and Fruit and Non-fruit Trees: Cash compensation for the loss of agricultural crops at current market value of mature crops based on average production and for fruits and non-fruit trees subject to be fixed by CDC; . Loss of Income by Agricultural Labours/Wage Earners: One time financial assistance to affected labours/earners, equivalent to 90 days wages; . Loss of Business in the Affected Structures: One time lump-sum grant equivalent to minimum one-month's income based on nature of business and types of losses to be paid on case-to-case basis; . Loss of Business Premises: One time cash assistance to the owners or renters equivalent to two months income based on the nature of business including shifting allowance will be paid on actual cost basis; . Loss of Wage by Employee: The employees affected due to Project's impact on structure and business will be provided one time financial assistance equivalent to 90 days wages rate as determined by CDC; . Loss of Business from Commercial Kiosks: The affected commercial kiosk will be provided one time cash assistance equivalent to one month’s income on case to case basis based on type of business and average income from the business; . Additional Assistance to Vulnerable Groups: The entitlement matrix provisions cash compensation to the affected vulnerable households for 90 days wage rate plus cash assistance equivalent to NRs. 10,000 per households will be provided for restarting their livelihood; . Livelihood Assistance and Skill Development Training: Households having more than 10% loss of total holdings of agricultural land/income, complete loss of residential
6 There is also provision of land for land compensation to the DPs having complete loss of their land only if Government land is available in the area (Land Acquisition Act 1977, Clause 14) xvi
structures, and vulnerable groups will be provided skill development training according to their choices, and availability of training packages in the project location through the Supervision Consultant equivalent to NRs. 8000 per family; . Temporary Employment in the Project: Displaced persons from vulnerable and significantly affected households will also be encouraged for temporary employment for semi-skilled and non-skilled work in the project construction work through the contactors; . Compensation for the Owners of the Residential/commercial Structures: One- time cash compensation for the affected structures used as residential, commercial and other purposes (e.g. toilet, well, cattle shed etc) will be paid to DPs at full replacement costs subject to be fixed by CDC at replacement value. The vulnerable squatters/encroachers will also be eligible to get assistance for the loss of structures/assets at full replacement costs. The Owners of the affected structures will be allowed to take/reuse all the salvageable materials for rebuilding/rehabilitation of the structures without any deduction from the compensation amount. In case of rebuilding and rehabilitation, the DPs will be paid two months local agricultural wage rate for rebuilding/rehabilitation of structures and transport allowance to cover the cost for moving structures including load-offload cost. The vulnerable squatters will also be paid for the loss of structures and transport allowance but they will not be eligible for the loss of land; . Compensation for the Loss of Residential/Commercial Structures by Tenants: The renters/tenants of the affected residential/commercial structures will be provided financial assistance equivalent to one month's rental charge for moving to the alternative premise for re-establishing their home/business plus transfer allowance to cover the cost of shifting; . Loss of Cultural and Community Structures/Land/Facilities: The religious/cultural/community structures affected due to acquisition and construction activities will be constructed/rehabilitated or provided cash compensation to the recognized patron/custodian. . Unanticipated Adverse Impacts: Any unanticipated consequences of the project during and after project implementation will be dealt by the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) in accordance to the principles of the Entitlement Matrix. H. Resettlement Budget and Financing Plan 19. The total estimated RP implementation cost for the Subproject is NRs. 239,808,721.45 equivalent to US$ 2,718,919.36 @ of exchange rate NRs. 88.20 per 1 US$ (Rate of July 20, 2012). All cost required for compensation and RP implementation will be borne by the Government of Nepal. The estimated resettlement cost for the Subproject includes eligible compensation, resettlement assistance, and support cost for RP implementation. The cost estimate for compensation has been prepared based on the information about the likely resettlement impacts on different assets (land, structures etc) derived from the census survey. The rate for cost calculation is based on the Government rate subject to be finalized by Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) in accordance to Land Acquisition Act 1977. I. Grievance Redress Mechanism 20. With a view to likeliness of grievances during RP implementation, provision of constituting Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) has been made in the RP to cut down the lengthy litigation. The GRC to be coordinated by Project Manager (PM) as the Member Secretary supported by other members (to be nominated as needed) and representatives of DPs. In order to reduce the number and pressure of grievances at district level, the RP also ensures provision of forming Subproject Level Committee (SLC) to be represented by local level communities and DPs. The SLC is expected to resolve the general grievances at community level before formal submission to GRC. xvii
J. Institutional Arrangement 21. The Ministry of Physical Planning, Works and Transport Management will be the Executing Agency (EA), and Department of Roads (DOR) will be the implementing agency (IA). A Project Implementation Unit (PIU) will be established at Project Directorate (ADB) under the DoR to take the responsibility of overall implementation of the Subproject. A Social / Resettlement Specialist (SRS) under the Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) will be made responsible to support the PDs on the overall RP implementation mechanism and process. At the field level, a Subproject office will be established under the PIU, headed by Project Managers (PM) in the rank of Senior Divisional Engineer (SDE). The consultant SRS with the support of PIU and PM, CDC, GRC and local community will carry out all the RP implementation activities. He/she will be supported by PM in coordinating with the CDC and CDO in the matters related to compensation rate, resolving grievances, and monitoring of day-to-day RP implementation activities. K. Implementation Schedule 22. As per the technical design, the Subproject is expected to be started from the first quarter of 2013 to the fourth quarter of 2014. The RP implementation timeframe will be scheduled based on the overall project implementation program. However, all the tasks of distributing compensation to the DPs and other rehabilitation/relocation assistance will be completed prior to mobilization of the contractors. L. Monitoring and Reporting 23. Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) activities implemented under the Subproject will be monitored internally as well as externally. Internal monitoring is the responsibility of Project Implementation Unit (PIU), and external monitoring will be conducted by a qualified and experienced external agency. Department of Roads will establish a semi annual monitoring and reporting system incorporating all aspects of land acquisition and resettlement activities. 24. The Project Implementation Unit (PIU) with the support of Subproject Office (SPO) and Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) will oversee and monitor the RP implementation activities at the field level. The SPO will monitor the day-to-day resettlement activities carried out by the CSC and will conduct field monitoring. The Project Manager (PM) based on the review of RP implementation activities and CSC's progress report, will submit quarterly progress reports to PIU. The central level GESU unit will also carry of internal monitoring on regulars basis. 25. As per the ADB requirement, the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) will engage an external monitoring agency to carry out an independent monitoring of RP implementation. Some of the potential sources of external monitoring could be consulting firms/universities, departments/independent consultants etc. 26. The Project Managers (PM) with the support of supervision consultant will prepare a monthly progress report on resettlement activities and submit to the PIU and a copy to GESU, and quarterly reports to PIU and ADB. The external monitoring agency will carry out bi-annual reviews and share the information with DoR. Semiannual progress report will be prepared based on the review and finalized in collaboration with the PIU and supervision consultation and then submit to DoR and ADB. . 1
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. General 1. The Government of Nepal (the Government) had applied for a grant from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for the Transport Project Preparatory Facility (the Facility) and applied a portion of proceeds to engage a firm of international consultants (the Consultant) to: (a) undertake preparatory activities for the processing of a new loan or grant projects for funding by ADB or other bilateral or multilateral development institutions; and (b) provide capacity development support to prepare and implement PPP projects. 2. Thus, the Project is having two Parts A and B. The objective of Part A is to review the government’s Priority investment plan (2007 – 2016) for the development and management of strategic road network, discuss and identify with the department of Roads (DOR) about 900 Km of high priority road sections and carrying out combined feasibility study and detail engineering design, including minor structures and bridges which consist of : (i) Appropriate condition surveys (ii) Engineering design, specifications, bill of quantities, cost estimates, and bidding documents for improvement works. (iii) Economic Analysis (iv) Social and Environmental assessment (v) Bidding Documents (vi) Procurement Assistance etc. 3. Part-B involves capacity strengthening in PPP preparatory work and implementation with the objective of establishing an enabling environment. This includes: PPP sector diagnostic and sector map – reviewing legal, regulatory, and policy frameworks, assess institutional structures, conducting stakeholder consultation, and clarifying sector strategy and road map; identify and prepare at least one small scale pilot PPP project – assessing and selecting PPP options, defining procurement and bid evaluation process, and preparing bid package. 4. Consulting Services for Part A, which involves Preparation for Priority Roads Improvement Projects is having following Phases Detailed Survey and Design: about 300 Km Feasibility Study and Detailed Survey & Design: about 200 Km Feasibility Study: about 400 Km 5. Under the phase I, a total number of seven roads have been considered as high priority roads by DoR/ADB and included for detail survey and design. Feasibility studies of these roads were carried out under the PPTA 7411 NEP. Figure 1 indicates location of the seven roads selected for detail survey and descriptions of selected roads by length and type is given in Table 1. 2
Figure 1: Location of TPPF Subprojects
Table 1. Description of Roads Included in TPPF
S. No. Road Length (Km) Road Classification 1 Ramapur- Lumbini- Kakrahwa ( RK) 34.57 Feeder Road/Highway 2 Manthali- Ramechhap (MR) 13.35 Feeder road 3 Halesi-Diktel (HD) 35.437 Mid Hill Highway 4 Leguwaghat- Bhojpur (LB) 65.55 Mid Hill Highway 5 Lguwaghat- Tumlintar (Savakhola) (LT) 24.63 Feeder Road 6 EWH-Koshi Bridge- EWH (EE) 62.90 Asian Highway 7 Mechipul- Chandragadhi- Birtamod (MB) 12.16 Feeder road
(38 km) estimated during the feasibility phase has been fixed as 35.43 km by detail design.
3
6. The Department of Roads (DoR), SASEC Road Connectivity Project (SRCP) will be responsible for implementing the Resettlement Plan (RP) for its Subproject. As guided by the Terms of Reference (ToR) this resettlement plan prepared under the TPPF based on the RP prerared during the feasibility phase. However, the RP may require further updating during the implementation phase in order to address some specific issues like; adjust the number of affected land parcels and DPs after carrying out land measurement survey for non verified land parcels which were destroyed during maoists’ insurgency in the country,to update the compensation rate and cost after finalization from the Compensation Determination Committee (CDC), and so on.
B. The Subproject 7. The Subproject road is a part of Hilepani-Diktel road (about 74.57 km) under the Mid-Hill Highway8. Hilepani-Halesi section (about 40 km) of the road is being improved as a single lane feeder road standard by Department of Roads, Road Improvement Project (RIP) with funding from the Exim Bank of India. Earlier the DFID funded Rural Access Programme (RAP) had opened track between Hilepani and Diktel linking to Bhojpur.9 8. The DoR under the SASEC Road Connectivity Project (SRCP) intends to improve the remaining Halesi-Diktel section (the Subproject road) as an intermediate lane bituminous road. As per the detail design, the total length of the road is 35.43 km and its available formation width is 6 meters. As per the technical design the alignment standard of the road contain 6. meters width excluding side drain.
Figure 2: Alignment Route of Halesi - Diktel Road
8 The Mid-Hill High Way links at least 23 hilly districts and 12 zones of Nepal. The road will connect the district viz. Panchthar, Dhankuta, Bhojpur, Khotang, Okhaldhunga, Udaypur, Sindhuli, Kavre, Bhaktapur, Kathmandu, Dhading, Chitwan, Tanahu, Kaski, Parbat, Baglung, Rukum, Surkhet, Jajarkot, Dailekh, Achham, Doti, Dadheldhura and Baitadi. The proposed 7.5 meter wide road will connect the several small and big cities viz. Panchthar, Basantapur, Hile, Bhojpur, Diktel, Ghurmi, Khurkhot, Nepalthok, Dhulikhel, Kathmandu, Mugling, Pokhara, Baglung, Musikot, Dailekh, Sanfebagar, Dadeldhura, and Jhulaghat on its way. The Department of Roads has established a separate division to look after the construction of the project at its department. 9 ADB TA 7411-NEP Road Connectivity Project, WSP-GEOCE, Inception Report, May 2010
4
C. Description of the Subproject Location 9. The Subproject lies at Khotang district in the Eastern Development Region (EDR) of the country, located at the distance of about 511 km east from the capital city (Kathmandu). Khotang is one of the remote mountain districts of Eastern Nepal. Halesi Mahadevsthan, a famous religious place (for both the Hindus and Buddhists) is located at Halesi, approximately 35 km west from Diktel. The name of Subproject has been assigned by using the names of the particular religious temple and the district itself. The zero chainage of the Subproject starts from Giri tole located at 100 meter ahead from the Halesi temple and passes through the VDCs of Madevsthan, Salle, Arkhaule, Nunthala, Kharpa, Buipa, Bamrang, and ends at Diktel bazaar of Diktel VDC. Halesi, Arkhaule Bazaar, Nunthala, Bamrang, and Diktel Bazaar are some of the key junction/market areas along the alignment route. Implementation of this Subproject has been expected to enhance socioeconomic conditions of the people in the area also by promoting internal and external tourism due improved access to the temple of Halesi Mahadev located at Halesi. The name of VDCs and key places traversed by the Subproject road are given in Table 2.
Table 1. Key Locations Traversed by the Subproject Road VDCs Name of Villages Mahadevsthan Halesi, Patle, Aaiselukharka , Barkhetar Salle Sallebazaar, Nagi, Kafle Arkhaule Arkhaule, Kamidanda, Bijule, Buipa Galeni, Khilkupani Nunthala Mure, Nunthala, Bhayanjyang Kharpa Kharpa, Nunthala Bamrang Kharagar, Katuwalgaon Diktel Hurlung, Mudhe
D. Benefits and Impacts
1. The Beneficial Impacts 10. This Subproject road will facilitate linkages for 21 key settlements of 8 VDCs within the district and benefit to the people living in the district. Construction of this road is expected to play a vital role on uplifting the socioeconomic conditions of local people due to diversification of economic activities in general and particularly along the road alignment rout through enhancing the easy accessibility to these settlements.. The community meetings and interviews that were conducted with affected persons and local communities believe that the potential benefit from the execution of the subproject is much more than their losses. Most of Displaced households felt the need for better motorable transport facility. The Subproject will enhance scope of income generation to the local people for income generation opportunities likely to be generated during the construction phase and facilitate to get easy market for their agricultural products. The beneficiaries were convinced that the potential benefits as outlined above could only be accrued through the selected subproject alignment. 11. Some of the specific tangible benefits of the road improvement are: Easy access to transportation facilities by reducing travel time and cost; Increase in the scope of economic, and tourism related activities; 5
Increase in the scope of developing other infrastructure facilities; Increase the value of land; Economic diversification; Employment opportunities to the local people during the construction phase.
2. The Negative Impacts 12. The designed total length of the Subproject road is about 35.43 km. The detail design for the Resettlement Plan is prepared for fifteen meters Corridor of Impact (CoI). In the same line, the census survey for this Subproject road was carried out within fifteen meters corridor of impact along the existing alignment. On an average, the available existing width of the road is about 6 meters across the alignment. 13. Based on the census survey carried out across the Subproject road alignment an estimated area of 19.44 ha of private land need to be acquired for the improvement of this Subproject road which will likely to affect about 914 number of land parcels displacing approximately 2303 persons of 389 households. Of total households having impact on their land, 88 households have also impact on their structure (Table 3).
Table 2: Summary of Affected Assets and Displaced Persons
Types of Affected Affected Displaced Land Land Area to be Assets Households Persons Parcels acquired (ha.) Land only 301 2303 914 19.44 Land with structures 88 Total 389[a] 2303 914 19.44
Source: Census July 2012 [a] Of the total identified household having impact on their land only 437 land parcels owned by 242 households were verified during the census survey and the remaining 477 parcels of 147 HHs could not be verified (also see note below for detail): Note: It is also to be noted that official land ownership record of the identified affected households could not be verified from District Land Revenue Office (DLRO) as some of the land ownership record in the districts were destroyed/burnt during the 10 years Maoist insurgency in the country. Nevertheless, of the total households having impact on their land, ownership record of 242 affected households were verified through the land ownership certificate brought by the displaced households and even from the record of District Land Survey Office, Diktel. For the remaining affected land parcels, as DLRO at project district has advised to carry out land measurement survey in the relevant sections of the Subproject road in order to delineate the non-verified project affected land parcels for preparing the official land record. However, all of displaced households having impact on their land were included in the census survey. The 2303 displaced persons relate to 242 interviewed households.
E. Project Components 14. The major activities to be carried out under this sub-project include; . Some pavement improvement; . Minor widening; 6
. Additional roadside structures; . Slope protection works; . Bio-engineering works; and . Black top
F. Measures Taken to Minimize Impacts 15. The Government of Nepal (GoN) has legally fixed 50 meters Right of Way (RoW) of for the highways. In this sense, the standard RoW of the Mid-Hill Highway is also 50 meters. Being a part of the Mid-Hill Highway the Subproject road requires 50 meters RoW. However, the Government policy and guidelines, also suggest following most economical and practical way possible and making best use of appropriate technology while constructing the road. Accordingly, the technical design of the Subproject road was carried out based on the Government design standard by: (i) utilizing the existing alignment, and (ii) acquiring land based on actual need for 6.5 meters formation width and 9 meters spare for side drain, likely resettlement impacts and traffic safety. In this sense, the resettlement impact of the Subproject has been minimized as only small strips of land and 106 structures along the existing alignment need to be acquired for the Subproject road.
G. Scope and Objective of Resettlement Plan 16. This RP has been updated based on the draft RP prepared during the feasibility phase by conducting detail census survey along the corridor of Subproject road. The principal objective of this Resettlement Planning Document is to plan measures for compensating, rehabilitating, and relocating (if applicable) to those who might be displaced due to resettlement impacts likely to be brought by the Subproject. Based on the finding of resettlement census carried out during the detail design, an estimated number of 2303 persons of 389 households have been expected to be directly affected due to acquisition of land and other assets for the Subproject. 17. The RP may require further updating during the implementation phase as information on some of the affected land parcels yet to be updated by conducting land measurement survey for the official record missing land as some affected land parcels were destroyed from the District Land Revenue Office during 10 years Maoist insurgency in Nepal.
H. Methods of Resettlement Impact Assessment 18. Resettlement impact in the Subproject road has been finalized by conducting a detail field survey, and consultations with stakeholder in different field locations during the month of July 2012. Some of the key stakeholders consulted include local community, family members of displaced households, local key informants, officials of relevant district level agencies like; District Land Survey Office, District Land Revenue Office, District Agricultural Office, District Forest Office, local political leaders, and representatives of local level institutions etc. The Resettlement Specialist, supported by Field Surveyor, Cadastral Surveyor and other team members conducted field survey in the Subproject location. One-day orientation was conducted to resettlement team in advance to the fieldwork for making them familiar with the objective and method of detail census survey and to train them on using the information collection tools (census questionnaire and inventories formats, socio-economic questionnaire, and checklists). The team with the guidance and intensive support from the Resettlement Specialist carried out field survey across the corridor of Subproject road to collect information on likely resettlement impacts on different assets and socio-economic information from the displaced households. 7
3. Cadastral Survey 19. Cadastral survey of the likely affected land parcels in eight VDCs of Khotang district was carried out under the supervision of Cadastral Surveyor from the District Land Survey Office. The project team first collected the relevant cadastral maps of the project area form the District Land Survey Office of Khotang. Then they mapped out centerline of the road alignment and extreme edge on the cadastral maps based on the detailed engineering designs of the road. Again, the survey team took the marked cadastral maps to the field. The Cadastral Surveyor with the knowledge of engineering design identified upgrading requirements and likely areas of land to be acquired. The team pegged the alignment and impact boundaries and verified the affected land areas, assets and structures. The affected lands and other assets were determined at the site and the cadastral surveyors enumerated and measured other affected assets (e.g. structures, trees etc) within the premises of affected land parcels. The social survey team then collected the census related information from affected households.
4. Assets Inventory 20. Inventories of affected assets and affected households were also prepared with the involvement of Resettlement Specialist, Field Surveyor, Cadastral Surveyors, Field Researcher, Enumerators, representative of District Land Survey Office and other concerned District Level Officials deputed in the field. Displaced households were also participated in the process. However, inventory of some affected land parcels (477 parcels of 147 HHs) could not be officially verified, because ownership documents/records of such land were destroyed from District Land Revenue Office during 10 years Maoist insurgency. Therefore, inventory of such affected land parcels need to be updated during the implementation after conducting land measurement survey by DLRO in such affected area as discussed in the note of Chapter 1.4.2.
5. Census Survey 21. The census survey was carried out in the month of July 2012 from all identified households having impact on their assets. Information on family members and their affected assets were collected through the census survey.
6. Socio-economic Information of the Displaced Persons 22. Socio-economic information of the directly project affected households were carried out to assess the key socio-economic indicators of the displaced households like; sources of income and average annual income of the displaced households, vulnerability status of the households, issues related to resettlement impact in the households, and other relevant information and to solicit their suggestion.
7. Qualitative Information and Community Consultations 23. Qualitative socio-economic information such as; perception about the project, potential benefits and likely negative impacts (especially to vulnerable groups), likely resettlement issues, key issues related to women and children, and other local issues were also assed during the census survey. Such information were solicited through discussion with the family members of displaced households, local community, representative of local level institutions and political parties, and other key informants (e.g. VDC/ward representatives, significantly displaced persons, women, school teachers etc) individually or in groups. 8
II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT
A. Findings of Resettlement Census Survey 24. The detail resettlement survey carried out across the Subproject section in July 2012- collected socio-economic information of the displaced persons and determined the number of displaced households and their affected assets. Based on the findings of census survey 2303 persons of 389 households are likely to be displaced due to impact on their 19.4 ha of private land and 106 numbers of structures. Table 4 provides summary on the key resettlement impact of the Subproject road.
Table 4. Summary on the Key Impact of the Subproject
No of No. of Affected Land Unit Displaced Displaced HHs Persons
Total Private Land being Affected (Ha) 19.44 389 2303 Total Government/Aailani Land (Ha) 12. 16 - Total 31.58 389 2303 Affected Structure Residential (Number) 73 60 354 Commercial Only (Number) 11 8 47 Residence Cum Commercial 18 106 20 (Number) Rental 2 2 12 Total 106 88 519 Source: Census Survey, July 2012 25. As shown in the table above, of the total number of displaced households (389 HHs) having affect on land and structures, 301 households have affect only on their land and the remaining 88 households have affect both on their land and structures. Among the displaced households 62 households also loss their trees. Details on displaced households and displaced persons by type of affected assets and displaced households by other social categories (e.g. by indigenous a households, disadvantaged households, etc) have been discussed in the upcoming subsections.
B. Scope of Land Acquisition 26. As per the detail design, to improve the existing road to the standard of intermediate lane road with side drains and retaining walls, the Subproject has been fixed the 15 meters' Corridor of Impact (CoI) for Resettlement purpose. On an average, the available existing width of the road is about 6 meters. Therefore, additional nine meters of land needs to be acquired across the existing alignment, for which, an estimated area of 31.6 ha additional land is required. However, the census survey identified that about 12.16 ha (38.48%) percent land along the road corridor to be Government land (ref. Annex 2). Based on this information the 9 actual additional private land requirement for this road is only about 19.44 ha after excluding the available Government land (12.16 ha). As per the findings of details census the area of affect land (19.44 ha) comprises 914 parcels owned by 389 households. The summary on impact on land is presented in Table 2.2. Inventories of affected private land parcels by percentage of loss and Government land have been included in Annex 1 and 2 respectively.
Table 5. Impact on Land and Displaced Persons
Area of Land to Number of Land Number of Number of Displaced be Acquired Parcel Displaced HHs Person (ha.)
19.44 914 389[a] 2303
Source: Census Survey, July 2012 [a] Of the total identified household having impact on their land only 437 land parcels owned by 242 households were verified during the census survey and the remaining 477 parcels of 147 HHs could not be verified (also see note below for detail): Note: It is also to be noted that official land ownership record of the identified affected households could not be verified from District Land Revenue Office (DLRO) as some of the land ownership record in the districts were destroyed/burnt during the 10 years Maoist insurgency in the country. Nevertheless, of the total households having impact on their land, ownership record of 242 affected households were verified through the land ownership certificate brought by the displaced households and even from the record of District Land Survey Office, Diktel. For the remaining affected land parcels, as DLRO at project district has advised to carry out land measurement survey in the relevant sections of the Subproject road in order to delineate the non-verified project affected land parcels for preparing the official land record. However, all of displaced households having impact on their land were included in the census survey
1. Extent of Land Loss 27. Of the total household interviewed during the census (389 HHs), 324 (83.29%) households have less than 10% impact on their land out of their total land holdings. The remaining 41 (10.54%) household loose between 10-20%, and 20 (5.14 %) households is losing 20-30% land. Likewise, 1 (0.26%) household losing between 30-40% and another 1 (0.26%) have 40-50% impact on their land out of their total holdings (Table 6) and details on percentage of land loss by affected households based on the affected land parcel.
Table 6. Distribution of Households having Impact on Land by Percentage of Loss
More VDCs Having 20- 30- 40- than Total Impact on Land <10% 10-20% 30% 40% 50% 50% HHs Mahadevsthan 36 11 4 0 0 0 51 Salle 17 2 0 0 0 0 19 Arkhaule 93 14 6 1 0 2 116 Buipa 7 0 1 0 0 0 8 10
More VDCs Having 20- 30- 40- than Total Impact on Land <10% 10-20% 30% 40% 50% 50% HHs Nunthala 79 3 5 0 0 0 87 Kharpa 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 Bamrang 34 4 3 0 0 0 41 Diktel 48 7 1 0 1 0 57 Total 324 41 20 1 1 2 389 Percentage 83.29 10.54 5.14 0.26 0.26 0.51 100 Source: Census Survey July 2012
2. Ownership Type of Affected Land 28. Based on the census survey, altogether 991 land parcels have been identified likely to have resettlement impact. Among them 914 (92.23%) are privately owned and 77(7.77%) are owned by various government agencies. Thus, only the private land have been considered for acquisition under this RP as the Government land can be acquired without compensation by mutual understanding and official negotiations (Table 7). Any official tenant could not be identified associated with the affected land parcels.
Table 7. Ownership Type of Affected Land Parcels Area of Land to be S.N. Description No. % Acquired (ha.) 1 Private Land 914 19.44 61.52
2 Government Land 77 12.16 38.48 Total 991 31.60 100
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
3. Ownership Type of Affected Land by Caste and Ethnicity 29. Among the total interviewed households displaced due to loss of land is 24.94% (97-n) household belongs to Brahmin/Chhetri caste groups and another 9% (35-n) households belong to Sanyasi caste group. The remaining displaced households belong to the Indigenous People (IP) and occupational caste group’ households (Table 8).
Table 8. Classification Households Displaced due to Land Loss by Caste/Ethnicity
S.No. Caste/Ethnicity No of HHs %
1 Brahaman/Chhetri 97 24.94
2 Syanyasi 35 9.00 11
S.No. Caste/Ethnicity No of HHs %
3 Disadvantage Janajati (IP) 177 45.50
4 Advantage Janajati (Newar ) 59 15.17
5 Ethnic Occupational Caste (Dalit) 21 5.40
Total 389 100.00
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
4. Caste and Ethnicity of the Households having Affect on Land 30. Most of the displaced households affected due to loss of land have been concentrated in the VDCs of Arkahaule (29.28%), Nunthala (22.36%), Diktel (14.65%) and Bamrang (10.55%) followed by other VDCs (Table 9). The table also shows that collectively, most of the displaced households (97.70%) losing land in Nuthala VDC belongs to 84 indigenous and one occupational caste group households. While assessing information on distribution of households by VDCs and caste/ethnicity, Indigenous people and Brahmin/Chhetri caste groups households have been displaced in all VDCs.
Table 9. Caste/Ethnicity of Displaced Households having Land Loss by VDC
No. of Displaced Household By Caste and Ethnicity VDCs Having Brahaman/ Advantage Ethnic Impact on Disadvantage Janajati Occupational Total Land Chhetri Sanyasi Janajati (IP) (Newar) Caste (Dalit) HHs % Mahadevsthan 15 2 28 1 5 51 13.11 Salle 11 0 5 3 0 19 4.88 Arkhaule 12 32 17 45 10 116 29.82 Buipa 1 0 7 0 0 8 2.06 Nunthala 1 1 84 0 1 87 22.36 Kharpa 1 0 9 0 0 10 2.57 Bamrang 32 0 6 0 3 41 10.55 Diktel 24 0 21 10 2 57 14.65 Total 97 35 177 59 21 389 100 Percentage 24.94 9.00 45.50 15.17 5.40 100.00 100.00 Source: Census Survey July 2012
5. Quality of Affected Land 31. Land quality in Nepal has been classified into four categories (Abbal, Doyam, Sim and Chahar). According to Land Act (1964), the categorization of land is based on productivity and fertility for the purposes of collecting revenue and registration fee during transaction in accordance to the distinctive quality of land. Generally, Abbal means high productive land, Doyam means medium quality land, Sim means lower quality land and Chahar means lowest quality land. Based on the census verification all most land to be acquired for the Subproject 12
(14.57 ha) comes under the quality of Chahar category (land with less productivity) where as 4.87 ha land consists under Sim category (lower productivity). The land information indicated that majority of the landholders are going to lose small portion of land for this subproject. Table 10 below shows the different quality of affected land and area.
Table 10. Quality of Affected Land (Area in ha) Abbal Doyam Sim Chahar Total VDC (High (Medium (Lower ( Less (ha) Productive) Productive) Productive) Productive) Mahadevsthan - - 0.1513 0.3962 0.5475 Salle - - 0.4301 0.7747 1.2048 Okhrel - - 0.6817 1.7186 2.4003 Buipa - - 0.8657 4.0398 4.9055 Nunthala - - 1.0354 2.1330 3.1684 Kharpa - - 0.6471 1.5098 2.1569 Bamrang - - 0.9699 3.5421 4.5120 Diktel - - 0.0851 0.4597 0.5448 Total 4.8663 14.5739 19.4402 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
6. Irrigation Facilities on Affected Land Parcels 32. All affected land parcels do not have irrigation facilities; however, monsoon irrigated land for the paddy crops are also observed during field survey. The following Table 11 shows the irrigation facility of affected land parcels.
Table 11. Irrigation Facilities on Affected Land Parcels
S.N. Description No % 1 Non-irrigated 914 100.00 2 Irrigated 0 0 Total 914 100.00
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
C. Present Use of Affected Land 33. Classifies the area of affected land by purpose of use have been summarized in Table 12. As most of the affected land (59.1%) is either upland being used mainly for agricultural purpose or homestead land (36.9%), by quality and about 4.1% affected area covers the fallow land.
13
Table 12. Present Use of Affected Land
Description No. of Plots Affected Area (ha) Percentage
Homestead 358 7.17 36.9 Up Land 522 11.48 59.1 Fallow 34 0.79 4.1 Total 914 19.44 100.00 Source: Census Survey, July 2012 34. Viability of residual land. None of the displaced households is likely to be landless even after the acquisition of land for the Subproject road. As the census data shows, all of the displaced households will have remaining land for cultivation and for other purposes (e.g. residential, commercial etc) even after acquisition of their land for the Subproject road. 35. The census data also reveals that, of the total 389 HHs having impact on their land 324 (83.29%) households have less than 10% impact on their land and remaining 65 (16.71%) households are likely to loss more than 10% percent land due to the project. Based on consultation with the displaced persons involved in the census survey, local community, and District Land Revenue Office the area of land reported by DPs during the census do not cover all the area of land owned by as the census team could not verify the land ownership record of 147 (37.89%) households out of the total affected households (389 HHs). Please refer the note below Table 2.2.
D. Loss of Income Generating Assets
1. Loss of Agricultural Crops 36. Acquisition of land for the Subproject may also causes losses of standing crops (Table 13). The estimated quantity of crops loss has been calculated based on the area of land to be acquired, average quantity of major crops grown in the area based on the Government’s standard10. The Entitlement Matrix (EM: B-1(a & b) provisions of advance notification to DPs to harvest the standing crops to the cultivators and cash compensation in case of loss of such standing crops subject to be determined by CDC.
Table 13. Estimated Loss of Standing Crops Land to be Acquired Affected Agricultural Estimated Production (kg) (ha.) Land Area (ha) 19.44 14.75 48269.48
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
2. Impact on Privately Owned Trees 37. Based on the inventory of affected assets, there are 755 private trees going to be affected during the road construction. All the affected private trees belong to three VDCs among
10 Statistical Information of Nepalese Agriculture 2007/2008, a publication of Ministry of Agriculture, Nepal & Selected Indicators of Nepalese Agriculture and Population, A brochures of the Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, 2010 and consultation with relevant officers and the Ministry 14 the eight VDCs having acquisition impact and the remaining five VDCs do not have impact on private trees (Table 14). The details of the affected trees are presented in the Annex 3.
Table 14. Description of Affected Trees Timber & S.N. VDC Fodder Fruit Bamboo Total Fuel wood 1 Madevsthan 40 9 15 158 222 2 Salle 6 47 1 25 79 3 Arkhule 115 36 3 300 554 Total 161 92 19 483 755 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
3. Loss of Tenancy on Affected Land 38. None of the affected land parcels have been found being cultivated by official/registered tenants/sharecroppers. However, this should be verified during implementation of the subproject road.
E. Loss of Structures 39. The upgrading work in the Subproject road affects altogether one hundred six (106) structures owned by eighty eight (88) households. Of the total affected structures 73 structures have been used for residential purpose,11 structures are commercial and 20 are residential cum commercial. The remaining two structures have been used for rental purposes. Table 15 provides descriptions of the affected structures by VDC. As the table shows most of the affected structures are concentrated at Arkhaule VDC followed by the VDCs of Nunthala and Salle. Inventory of affected by VDC and type of use is included in Annex 4.
Table 15. Distribution of Affected Structures by VDCs and Type of Use Commercial Residential Commercial S.N cum Rental Total VDC Structure Only . Residential No HHs Popn No HHs Popn No HHs Popn No HHs Popn No HHs Popn
1 Mahadevsthan 5 5 30 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 6 6 36
2 Salle 9 5 30 0 0 0 3 3 18 0 0 0 12 8 48
3 Arkhaule 30 24 142 9 6 35 7 6 35 1 1 6 47 37 218
4 Nunthala 26 24 142 2 2 12 5 4 24 1 1 6 34 31 184
5 Diktel 2 1 6 0 0 0 3 3 18 0 0 0 5 4 24
6 Bamrang 1 1 6 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 2 2 12
Total 73 60 354 11 8 47 20 18 106 2 2 12 106 88 519 Source: Census Survey, July2012 15
1. Extent of Impact on Structures by VDC and Present Use 40. All of the affected structures/houses have impact on the main structure and are traditional and semi modern by construction type. Therefore, all of them will have complete loss and would not be eligible to leave in the future Table 16 explains the details of the extent of loss of the affected Structures by VDC and type of use.
Table 16. Extent of on Structures by VDC by Type of Use
Residential Commercial Commercial Only Rental Structure cum Residential S.N. VDC Total P L F L Total P L F L Total P L F L Total P L F L Total
1 Mahadevsthan 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 6
2 Salle 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 12
3 Arkhaule 0 30 30 0 9 9 0 7 7 0 1 1 47
4 Nunthala 0 26 26 0 2 2 0 5 5 0 1 1 34
5 Diktel 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 5
6 Bamrang 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
Total 0 73 73 0 11 11 0 20 20 0 2 2 106
Source: Census Survey, july 2012 Note: [PL=Partial Loss, and FL=Full Loss]
2. Affected Structures by Type of Construction Materials 41. Most of the affected structures (100 n) are built with stone except six structures constructed with bamboo and wood fence. However, the construction quality by other material used are different as about 69% of structures are constructed by using mud mortar, 18.67% are mud mortar with plaster, 5.66% for each stone with cement mortar and bamboo and wood fence (Table 17).
Table 17. Affected Structures by Type of Construction Materials
S.No. Type of Structures No. %
1 Stone with mud mortar 74 69.81
2 Stone mud mortar with plaster 20 18.67
3 Stone with cement mortar 6 5.66
4 Bamboo and wood fenced 6 5.66
Total 106 100
Source: Census Survey, July 2012 16
3. Ownership Type of Affected Structures by Use 42. Of the total number of affected structures, (106-n) 32 structures have been used for business purpose which include ten commercial structures, 20 residential cum commercial structures, and two commercial structures given on rent. Most of the structures have been owned by the titleholders. However, two commercial structures owned by the titleholders have been given in rent and being used by the tenants. Table 18 summarizes the ownership type of affected structures by use
Table 18. Ownership Type of Affected Structure by Use
Given/Used Owned/Used by S.No. Structure Type by the Total Titleholders Tenants
1 Residential Structures 74 0 74
2 Commercial Structures 10 0 10 Residential cum 3 20 0 20 Commercial Structures Rented Commercial 4 0 2 2 Structures Total 104 2 106
Source: Census Survey, July 2012 43. The affected both residential and residential cum commercial structures have been used by the title owners for residential purpose and residential cum business purposes. However two commercial structures have been tented for to others. However, several business and income generating activities have been carried out in these commercial and commercial cum residential structures. Table 19 summarizes the types of business and other enterprises being operated in such structures.
17
Table 19. Types of Business and Other Enterprises Operated in Non- residential Structures
Types of Operating Residential cum Rented Business and Other Commercial S.No. Commercial Commercial Total Enterprises Structures (No.) Structures (No) Structures Activities
1 Cloths Shops 1 1 1 3
2 Hotels/Restaurants 2 1 1 4 3 Grocery Shop 2 6 0 8 4 Gold Shop 1 0 0 1 5 Tailoring Shop 1 0 0 1 6 Hardware shop 0 1 0 1 7 Tea Shops 2 5 0 7 8 Tea Shop/Grocery 2 6 0 8 Total 11 20 2 33
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
4. Loss of Employment 44. Impact on commercial and residential cum commercial structures are not likely to affect on the employment of the persons associated with such structures except three persons working in the hotels operated in affected commercial structures. As per the findings of census survey, the estimated days of employment loose is about 90 days and the average loss amount is NRs. 5000 per persons per month. (Table 20).
18
Table 20. Use of Affected Commercial and Residential Structures by Purpose S.No. Purpose of Use Loss of Employment in Estimated Duration of Commercial and Residential employment Loss cum Commercial Structures (in days) Commercial Residential Structures cum (No.of Commercial person) Structures (No. of Person) 1 Hotels/Restaurants 3 - 30 days x 3 x 3= 270 days 2 Grocery Shop - - - 3 Hardware shop - - - 4 Currently not being - - - used 5. Other specify, (for - - - example given to school etc) Total 3 - 30 days x 3 x 3= 270 days Source: Census Survey, July 2012
5. Ownership of the Affected Structures by Caste/Ethnicity 45. A majority of structures (43 no) belongs to Indigenous People (Janajati) and Newars (34 no.). The remaining structures are owned by Brahmin/Chhetries (17 no.), Sanyasi (10 no.), and dalit (2 no.). Table 21 summarizes the ownership of affected structures by different caste/ethnic groups.
Table 21. Ownership Affected Structures by Caste/Ethnicity of the Affected Households
S.No. Caste/Ethnicity No of HHs No of Structures
1 Brahaman/Chhetri 12 17
2 Syanyasi 8 10
3 Disadvantage Janajati (IP) 40 43
4 Advantaged Janajati ( Newar) 26 34
5 Ethnic Occupational Caste (Dalit) 2 2
Total 88 106
Source: Census Survey, July 2012 19
6. Affected Structures by Other Vulnerable Households 46. Nine (9) out of 106 affected structures belongs to different type of vulnerable households. Among them five structures belongs to women headed households followed by two structures of below poverty level households, two structures of Ethnic Occupational Caste (Dalits) respectively (Table 22).
Table 22. Affected Structures Owned by Vulnerable Households
Types of Venerable Households No of HHs Women Headed Household 5 Elderly Aged Household 0 Household With Disabled Person 0 Below Poverty Level Households 2 Ethnic Occupational Caste (Dalit) 2 Total 9 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
7. Relocation and Rehabilitation of the Displaced Households 47. Based on the consultation with the displaced persons, households likely to have complete loss of their structures have opted for compensation and other assistance to relocate/ rehabilitate their displaced structures. The entitlement matrix of the resettlement plan have provisioned cash compensation to the households displaced due to loss of their structures (both titleholders and vulnerable squatters) based on current market value to be fixed by the CDC [EM: C-1 (a)] and [EM: C-2 (a)]. Owners of the affected structures will be allowed to take/reuse all the salvageable materials for rebuilding/rehabilitation of the structures without any deduction from the compensation amount, For those requiring rebuilding/ rehabilitation, will also be paid two months local agricultural wage for rebuilding/rehabilitation of structures plus transport allowance to cover the cost for moving structures including load-offload cost. The vulnerable squatters will also be paid for the loss of structures and transport allowance but they will not be eligible for the loss of land [EM: C-1 (c)]. Similarly, The renters/tenants of the affected commercial and residential/commercial structures will be provided one month's rental financial assistance for moving to alternative premise for reestablishing their home/business plus transfer allowance to cover the cost of shifting [EM: C-3(a & b)]
F. Loss of Community Property Resources 48. All the efforts were made during the detail design to minimize resettlement impact on the community property resources. In this approach, some of the temples and community structures like Pati (structures built for community uses) have been saved through consultation with the local community. However, impact on some of such community assets could not be avoided like; Khamai Statue- located at Mahadevsthan VDC-1 at Aiselukharka cluster, and the community school’s Water Tank at Bhanjyang cluster of Nunthala VDC-9. These community properties need to be relocated during the implementation phase in close coordination and collaboration with the local community. The resettlement plan ensures budget to relocate to such community resources. Relocation/rehabilitation cost for such community structures have been incorporated in the contractor’s document. 20
G. Resettlement Impact on Indigenous/Ethnic Peoples 49. As the socioeconomic information reveals, the total number of displaced households (389 HHs) also included 177 numbers of indigenous households (see Table 4). Among them 134 indigenous households have impact only on land and 43 households have impact on both land and structures (see Table 21). The number of displaced IP households having different type of resettlement impact is also given in Table 23.
Table 23. Resettlement Impact on Indigenous People Households Population Ethinicity/Caste No of HHs Male Female Total Bhujel 5 16 10 26 Gurung 1 1 1 2 Magar 4 14 12 26 Rai 91 280 247 527 Sherpa 14 43 36 79 Tamang 62 176 161 337 Grand Total 177 530 467 997 Source: Census Survey, July 2012 50. Number of displaced IP households by affected structures. Among the IP likely to have impact on their structures due to the subproject (88 households), significantly higher number of (40) Disadvantage Janajati will have affect on their private structures comprising 23- Tamang households, 11 - Rai households, 2-.Sherpa households and 1 Magar household (Table. 24).
Table 24. No of Displaced IP Households by Affected Structures
No of Displaced IP Households by Affected Structure S.No. VDCs Magar Rai Sherpa Tamang Total 1 Mahadevsthan 0 2 0 0 2 2 Salle 0 0 0 0 0 3 Arkhaule 1 5 0 0 6 4 Nunthala 0 6 2 22 30 5 Diktel 0 1 0 1 2 6 Bamrang 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 14 2 23 40
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
51. As provisioned in the ADB SPS 2009 (Appendix 3, page 56), the indigenous people (IP) safeguard are triggered with a project directly or indirectly affecting the dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, or culture of IP or affects their territories, or natural/cultural resources that IP 21 or use, occupy as their natural domin, a separate Indigenous People Plan (IPP) is required. However in case of this subproject there will not be any adverse impact on the identity, culture and customary livelihhoods of the IPs therefore preparation of a separate IPP is not envisaged. 52. The entitlement matrix of the resettlement plan provisions compensation and other associated allowances to the IP for the affect on their land, crops, trees, and structures. Based on the findings of census survey, the displaced IP are not likely to be landless and homeless due to the Subproject impact because of compensation provision and availability of other land owned by them. Besides, the indigenous/ethnic people (IP) along the road corridor have been found integrated with the main social stream sharing common social and cultural values, norms, and having similar economic opportunities. Although some of the indigenous/ethnic groups have their own language and cultural traits they use Nepali language as the common tongue and share the similar national and social sentiments with the other mainstreamed groups. The socio- economic information of the displaced households also reveal several instances related to mainstreaming of IP with other community in the Subproject area in terms of literacy and degree of education attainment, land holding status, and occupation etc (refer socioeconomic information of the Indigenous people in Chapter 3). Hence, separate IP plan for this Subproject road may not be required. Besides, adequate attention will also be paid focusing to the IP households with respect to compensation and rehabilitation/relocation activities to be carried out during the implementation phase.
22
III. SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILE AND INFORMATION
A. Profile of the Subproject Districts 53. Khotang lies in Sagarmatha zone of eastern development region. The district covers an area of 1591 sq. mile and surrounded by Bhojpur district in the east, Udayapur in the north and west, Okhaldhunga in the west, and Solukhumbu district in the north. The total number of households in the district is 42,866 with the population of 231,385 comprising 49% male and 51% female. The male-female ratio of the district is 95 female per 100 male. The population density is 145 persons per sq.km. The overall literacy rate is 49.87 % out of which the proportion of male literate is 62.3 % and female literacy is 38.8 %. The district is divided into 76 Village Development Committees (VDC) and the entire population of the district is rural. Table 25 provides a brief summary on the key demographic profile of Khotang district.
Table 25. Key Demographic Characteristics of the Subproject District
S. N. Key Characteristics Indicators 1 Area 1,591 sq.m. 2 Number of Village Development 76 Committees 3 Number of Municipalities None 4 Number of Households 42,866 5 Total Population 231,385 6 Average Household Size 5.4 7 Population Density- per sq.m. 145 person 8 Sex Ratio(females per hundred male) 95 9 Literacy Rate 49.87% 10 Male Literacy 62.3 11 Female Literacy 38.8
Source: National Census 2001
1. Population Distribution of the Subproject District by Caste/ Ethnicity 54. The population of Khotang district by Caste/Ethnicity based on National Census 2001 is depicted in the Table 26. As the data shows, a majority of the population in the district is dominated by Janajati (55.12%), followed by Braman/Chhetri (32.53%), Dalit (9.45%) respectively. Table 3.2 figure outs Caste/Ethnic wise population of the Subproject district. 23
Table 26. Population Distribution of the Project District by Caste/ Ethnicity
S.No. Major caste/Ethnicity Population % 1 Brahmin Hill 19,874 8.59 2 Sarki 5,501 2.38 3 Rai 89,633 38.74 4 Tamang 9,251 4.00 5 Sanyasi 4,087 1.77 6 Magar 9,891 4.27 7 Gharti/Bhujel 3,444 1.49 8 Chhetri 51,295 22.17 9 Damai/Dhobi 5,985 2.59 10 Gurung 2,939 1.27 11 Newar 12,370 5.35 12 Kami 10,368 4.48 13. Others 6747 2.92 Total 231385 100.00
Source: CBS Census 2001
2. Distribution of Indigenous Population in the Project District 55. Of the total populaton in the Subproject district, (231385) about 53.34% (123,824) comprises indigenous population. Based on National Census 2001,amoung the indigenous population, the proportion of Rai population is highest (72.39%), followed by Newar (9.99%), Magar (7.92%), Tamang (4.24%), Gurung (2.37%), respectively and other minority indigenous group. Table 3.3 figure outs the distribution of Indigenous population in the project district.
Table 27. Distribution of Indigenous Population in the Project District
S.No. Indigenous People Population % 1 Tharu 158 0.13 2 Magar 9,811 7.92 3 Gurung 2,939 2.37 4 Newar 12,370 9.99 5 Tamang 5,251 4.24 6 Rai 89,633 72.39 7 Limbu 167 0.13 8 Sherpa 1,811 1.46 24
S.No. Indigenous People Population % 9 Dhanuk 9 0.01 10 Rajbansi 4 0.00 11 Sunuwar 627 0.51 12 Sattar/santhal 3 0.00 13 Bhara 1 0.00 14 Gangai 3 0.00 158 Thami 66 0.05 16 Dhimal 18 0.01 17 Bhote 72 0.06 18 Yakhha 4 0.00 19 Darai 2 0.00 20 Thakali 1 0.00 21 Chhantyal 1 0.00 22 Bote 1 0.00 23 Adibasi janajati 1 0.00 24 Meche 1 0.00 25 Raji 3 0.00 26 Majhi 842 0.68 27 Danuwar 23 0.02 28 Chepang/Praja 1 0.00 29 Hayu 1 0.00 Total 123,824 100.00
Source: CBS Census 2001
B. Profile of the Subproject Location 56. The Subproject road traverses through eight VDCs namely Mahadevsthan, Salle, Kharpa, Arkhaule, Nunthala, Buipa, Bamrang, and Diktel. The ensuing sub-chapters briefly describe the key profile of Subproject location. 57. Households and population of the subproject VDCs. Based on the National Census 2001, the subproject road passes the eight VDCs namely Mahadevsthan, Salle, Arkhaule, Buipa, Nunthala, Kharpa, Bamrang, and Diktel having 5,546 households with total 29,105 populations, comprising 14,125 (48.53%) male and 14,980 (51.47%) female with 5.25 average household size. Table 28 figure outs household characteristics of the project location. 25
Table 28. Number of Household and Population of the Subproject VDCs
District Total Total Male Female Average HH VDCs HHs Population Population Population Size Khotang district 42866 231385 112821 118564 5.40 Mahadevsthan 531 2709 1282 1,427 5.10 Salle 371 1883 928 955 5.08 Arkhaule 645 3524 1693 1,831 5.46 Buipa 1010 5381 2550 2,831 5.33 Nunthala 339 1792 855 937 5.29 Kharpa 410 2290 1140 1,150 5.59 Bamrang 597 3120 1480 1,640 5.23 Diktel 1643 8406 4197 4,209 5.12 Total 5546 29105 14125 14,980 5.25
Source: CBS, National Census 2001
C. Profile of the Displaced Households 58. During the census survey, key socio-economic characteristics of the displaced household and populations have been discussed in the following sub-section.:
1. Population Distribution of Displaced Household 59. Most of the displaced households in the Subproject area have been found concentrated in Arkhaule VDC (30.9%), followed by Nunthala (20.5%), Mahadevsthan (15.5%), Diktel (13.2%), and Bamrang (11%) VDCs. The proportion of displaced households in the remaining VDCs is relatively low. Table 29 summarizes the key demographic characteristics of the displaced household by VDC. Table 29. Distribution of Displaced Household and Population by VDCs Averag S. HH Population VDC % e HH N. No. Male % Female % Total % Size 1 Mahadevsthan 51 13.1 188 15.6 170 15.5 358 15.5 7.0 2 Salle 19 4.9 63 5.2 44 4.0 107 4.6 5.6 3 Arkhaule 116 29.8 375 31.1 337 30.7 712 30.9 6.1 4 Buipa 8 2.1 20 1.7 18 1.6 38 1.7 4.8 5 Nunthala 87 22.4 244 20.2 228 20.8 472 20.5 5.4 6 Kharpa 10 2.6 34 2.8 24 2.2 58 2.5 5.8 7 Bamrang 41 10.5 127 10.5 127 11.6 254 11.0 6.2 8 Diktel 57 14.7 155 12.9 149 13.6 304 13.2 5.3 26
Total 389 100.0 1206 100.0 1097 100.0 2303 100.0 5.9
Source: Census Survey, July2012
2. Family Type of Affected Households 60. Of the total interviewed affected households 125 (32.1%) belongs to nuclear family and 264 (67.9%) households belongs to joint family (Table 30).
Table 30. Family Type of the Displaced Households
S.N. Family Type Number % Remarks 1 Nuclear 125 32.1 2 Joint 264 67.9 Total 389 100 Source: Census Survey, July2012
3. Displaced Person by Gender and Age 61. The total population of the census households is 2303 with an average household size of 5.9 people per household. Among them, the proportion of economically active age groups is 66.2% followed by aged persons (8.5%), age group of 5-15 years (18.8%), and under five children (6.6%). Details of displaced persons by gender and age group are summarized in Table 31.
Table 31: Displaced Persons by Gender and Age Group
Less than 5 More than 5 - 15 Year 15-60 Year Total VDCs Sex Years 60 Year No. % No. % No. % No. % Male 78 3.4 230 10.0 796 34.6 102 4.4 1206 Female 73 3.2 202 8.8 728 31.6 94 4.1 1097
Overall 151 6.6 432 18.8 1524 66.2 196 8.5 2303 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
4. Distribution of Displaced Households by VDCs and Caste/ Ethnicity 62. A majority of displaced households in this Subproject belongs to the household of different indigenous groups. Among them, Disadvantaged Janajati (indigenous people) like Rai, Tamang, Magar, Gurung, Sherpa constitute 44.5% (n-177) households of the total displaced households. The remaining displaced households belong to the households of other caste/ethnic groups - Chhetri 16.20% (n-63), Advantaged Janajati 15.17% (n-59), Sanyasi 9.00% (n-35), Brahman 8.74% (n-34) Dalit 5.40% (n-21) respectively. Table 32 provides the details of caste and ethnic distribution of the Displaced Households in the subproject alignment.
27
Table 32. Distribution of Displaced Households by Caste and Ethnicity Advantage Brahman Chhetri Dalit Janjati Sanyasi VDC Janajati Total No % No % No % No % No % No %
Mahadevsthan 11 2.83 4 1.03 5 1.29 28 7.20 1 0.26 2 0.51 51
Salle 7 1.80 4 1.03 0 0.00 5 1.29 3 0.77 0 0.00 19 Arkhaule 11 2.83 1 0.26 10 2.57 17 4.37 45 11.57 32 8.23 116 Buipa 1 0.26 0 0.00 0 0.00 7 1.80 0 0.00 0 0.00 8 Nunthala 1 0.26 0 0.00 1 0.26 84 21.59 0 0.00 1 0.26 87 Kharpa 1 0.26 0 0.00 0 0.00 9 2.31 0 0.00 0 0.00 10 Bamrang 0 0.00 32 8.23 3 0.77 6 1.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 41 Diktel 2 0.51 22 5.66 2 0.51 21 5.40 10 2.57 0 0.00 57 Total 34 8.74 63 16.20 21 5.40 177 45.50 59 15.17 35 9.00 389 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
5. Literacy Status and Educational Level of the Displaced Population 63. Of the population above 5 years of age in the displaced households (151 persons) about 12.46 % (n-287) population is illiterate, and 10.94 % (n-252) are just able to read and write. However, the highest percent 31.09% (n-716) population of the displaced households have been found obtaining education between class 6-10. On the contrary, the proportion of people obtaining higher education or above bachelor’s level has been found only 4.6%. Similarly, women’s literacy status in the displaced household has also been found comparatively lower than those of male. Table 33 provides the details on the literacy status and level of education acquired by the population of the displaced household. Table 33. Literacy Status and Education Level of the Displaced Population Literacy Male % Female % Total % Status Illiterate 77 3.34 210 9.12 287 12.46 Can read and Write 117 5.08 135 5.86 252 10.94 Class 1 – 5 243 10.55 190 8.25 433 18.8 Class 6-10 418 18.15 298 12.94 716 31.09 SLC - 10+2 200 8.68 158 6.86 358 15.54 More than Bachelor 73 3.17 33 1.43 106 4.6 Less than 5 years 78 3.39 73 3.17 151 6.56 Total 1206 52.37 1097 47.63 2303 100 Source: Census Survey, July 2012 28
6. Land Ownership and Average Holding Size of Displaced Households 64. All the census households in the project location are reported for having own land (Table 34), and have been cultivating by themselves without having any legal tenant.
Table 34. Land Ownership Status of Affected Households S.N. Land Ownership Status No. of Households % 1 Have Own Land 389 100.00 2 Don't have Own Land 0 0.00 Total 389 100 Source: Census Survey, July 2012 65. There is difference on displaced households in terms of average land holding size. Based on census survey, 21.6 % (n-84) displaced households have been found owning less than 0.1ha followed by 35.0% (n-136) owning 0.1ha to 0.5ha, 20.6% (n-80) owning 0.5ha to 1ha of land, 17.7% (n-79) owning 1ha-2ha of land, and 5.1% (n-20) owning more than 2ha of land respectively. Collectively, out of total displaced households, majority of households (84 HHs) have 0.1ha to 0.5ha of land.. The following table (Table 3.11) shows the land holding pattern of displaced households. Table 35. Average Land Area Owned by Displaced Population 0.5 ha - 1 More than < 0.1 ha 0.1 ha-0.5 ha 1ha - 2ha Total ha 2 ha No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
Total 84 21.6 136 35.0 80 20.6 79 17.7 20 5.1 389 100.00
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
7. Occupational Status of Displaced Population 66. Of the total economically active population in the census, (72.0%) households informed agriculture as their main occupation followed by business (6.3 %), foreign employment (5.6%), service (5.0%) wage labour (2.4%), others (0.7%) respectively (Table 36). Among them, female involvement in agriculture and farm activities have been reported to be slightly higher (58%) compared to male (42%). Female's extensive involvement in agriculture may be considered as one of the indicators of their hardship (drudgery). Table 36. Occupational Status of Displaced Population by Sex Occupation Male Female Total % Agriculture 785 873 1658 72.0 Services 88 28 116 5.0 Business 80 64 144 6.3 Wage Labour 40 16 56 2.4 Foreign Employment 120 10 130 5.6 House Wife 1 24 25 1.1 Disable 2 5 7 0.3 Other 12 4 16 0.7 29
Less than 5 78 73 151 6.6 Total 1206 1097 2303 100.00 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
8. Migration Trend in the Displaced Households 67. About 45 (46.15) affected households have been found reporting one family member migrated and 72 (53.85%) households reported that they have two members migrated to other places (Kathmandu, other district, India and abroad) to seek employment opportunity. (Table 37).
Table 37. Migration Trend of Displaced Households
Two Member Migrated One Member Migrated HHs Total HHs No. % No. % No. % 45 46.15 72 53.85 117 100 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
9. Gender Status and Drudgery 68. As indicated by the outcome of social consultation, collectively female's status in the sampled households has been found to be lower than the male family members. Most of the female in the sampled households, as in other rural area of the country are mainly responsible for caring and bearing children, and overall management of day to day household activities including farm work. Findings of the survey data shows, about 9.12 % females of the sampled households are illiterate and 43 household’s female reported high involvement in household activities, only 10 household’s female reported high involvement in decision making process, similarly, 28 household’s female reported low involvement in selling and purchasing and only one displaced household’s female member reported low involvement in household activities. Near about the same number of household female members reported equal involvement in all the activities given below (Table 38). Based on discussion with the women family members of the interviewed households and local communities some of the other factors creating hardship to the females in the Subproject location are: lack or insufficient maternity and childcare services in their immediate reach, and practice of alcoholisms and gambling among the male family members.
Table 38. Gender Role in Displaced Households In percentage Particular High Low No Equal Involvement Involvement Involvement Responsibility
Agriculture 20 14 54 12 Household 43 1 53 Activities 3 Selling and 17 28 46 Purchasing 9 Decision Making 10 26 59 5 30
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
10. Vulnerable Households 69. Of the total displaced households interviewed (389 HHs), a total of 70 households have been reported to be vulnerable of different categories. Among them; 20 - women headed households, households having disable members 6, households headed by elderly persons 7 and 16 household are Below Poverty level (BPL) Table 39 provides the breakdown of affected vulnerable households by type of vulnerable categories. List of the vulnerable households displaced by the Subproject is incorporated in Annex-5.
Table 39. Affected Households by Different Vulnerable Categories Women Househol Elderly Ethnic Below Poverty Headed ds with Member Occupatio Total Level Househol Disable Headed nal Caste Hou VDC Households[1] ds Members Households (Dalit) se hold No No No No No Mahadevsthan 1 1 5 2 9 Salle 0 1 0 1 2 Arkhaule 4 1 2 10 5 22 Buipa 0 0 0 0 Nunthala 10 1 2 1 4 18 Kharpa 0 1 0 0 1 Bamrang 4 1 1 3 3 12 Diktel 1 1 1 2 1 6 Total 20 6 7 21 16 70 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
11. Average Annual Income of the Displaced Households 70. The average annual income of the displaced households has been calculated based on the average cash income of the households from different sources within last 12 months. Then the per capita income of the displaced households has been calculated by dividing the average annual income from the number of family members in each household for assessing the number of BPL households. As per this calculation, the average annual income of the displaced household has been reported to be NRs. 114,193.39 with per capita income of NRs 21,751.12. Foreign Employment and service has been reported as the main source of earning of census households. The other sources of income of the census households are trade/business; followed by labor, rent/pension, livestock selling, agricultural products.
Table 40. Average Annual Household Incomes
Total No of Per capita Source of Income % Avg Income Amount Respond /Per Person Agricultural Products 1124350 64 10.58 17567.97 3346.28 31
Total No of Per capita Source of Income % Avg Income Amount Respond /Per Person
Livestock Selling 1415200 68 11.24 20811.76 3964.15 Livestock Products 597750 24 3.967 24906.25 4744.05 Service 16008000 78 12.89 205230.77 39091.58 Labour 6474500 133 21.98 48680.45 9272.47 Trade/Business 16604000 95 15.7 174778.95 33291.23 Foreign Employment 21906000 93 15.37 235548.39 44866.36 Pension 4371200 40 6.612 109280 20815.2381 Other 586000 10 1.653 58600 11161.90476 Total 69,087,000 605 100.00 114,193.39 21,751.12 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
12. Poverty Status of the Displaced Household 71. Nepal is one of the poorest countries in the world. Most of the country’s population (above 80 %) lives in rural areas where poverty is more prevalent and severe. Poverty incidence in Nepal is high. 72. The 2010/11 Nepal Living Standard Survey (NLSS-III) shows that although poverty in Nepal has declined between 2003-04 and 2010-11, approximately one-fourth (25%) of Nepalese population are still below the national poverty line as of 2010-11. The rate of poverty reduction is lower in rural areas compared to urban areas. There is also evidence suggesting that the under-privileged social groups are the most impoverished. 73. There are a number of interlocking problems faced by the poor, which are also mutually reinforcing. The problems include, among others, low income and consumption, poor nutritional status, low educational attainment, low access to social and economic facilities and services, low access to economic opportunities, vulnerability to external shocks, and exclusion from economic, social and political processes. Therefore, Government of Nepal has considered access to road as one of the major sectoral approach to achieve the goal of poverty reduction. 74. Poverty in Nepal is defined in absolute term based on the requirement of minimum subsistence level rather than per capita income. Nepal Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) has used Cost of Basic Needs (CBN) method for the estimation of poverty line based on current prices per person per year. Poverty is calculated based on the average annual household income and its adequacy to meet the minimum subsistence needs of the family members. The Method used by CBS to determine the cost for minimum subsistence level is included in Box 1. 32
Box 1: Criteria to Estimate Below Poverty Line
- The per capita per day nutritional requirements for the average Nepali is determined.
The Estimated requirement was 2,220 kcl per person per day
- Then the cost of a bundle of food items to provide this nutritional requirement is calculated. The cost was NRs. 11,929 in 2010-11. - Finally the non-food consumption of the households is determined, costed and added with the cost of the food bundle. The non-food consumption was NRs. 7,332 per person per year in the year 2010-11.
- Based on the above calculation the official poverty line of Nepal was estimated as NRs. 19,261 by CBS in 2010-11 58 Source: Nepal Living Standards Survey, GoN, Central Bureau of Statistics, 2011
59 Source: Nepal Living Standars Survey, GoN, Central Bureau of Statistics, 2004 75. CBS has calculated the poverty line once in 1995-96 and another in 2003-2004 and 2010- 11. In 2010-2011, CBS has calculated the poverty line for six geographical locations (Kathmandu, Other Urban Area, Rural Western Hill, Rural Eastern Hill, Rural Western Terai and Rural Eastern Terai) besides the national poverty line. Table 41 provides details on poverty lines calculated by CBS by different geographical location for 2003-04 and 2010-11.
Table 41. Poverty Line in Current Prices Per Person Per Year
Poverty Line Calculated in Poverty Line Calculated in 2010-11 Geographical 2003-04 S.N. Locations Non-Food Non-Food Food Item Total Food Item Total Item Item 11056. 1. Kathmandu 6,722.0 4334.8 14,610 26,323 40,933 8 2. Other Urban 4,919.2 2981.9 7901.1 11,744 8,081 20,355 Rural Western 3. 5,613.0 3,288.5 8,901.5 12,537 5,891 18,428 Hill 4. Rural Eastern Hill 5,211.2 2758.5 8069.6 12,297 4,254 16,551 Rural Eastern 5. 4,323.2 1,755.6 6,078.8 11,333 5,524 16,856 Terai All Nepal 4,966.4 2,729.4 7,695.7 11,929 7,332 19,261 Source: Poverty Trend in Nepal (2003-04 and 2010-11), Central Bureau of statistics 76. As shown in Table 41 above National poverty line calculated by CBS is NRs. 7695.70 per person per year in 2003-04, where as it has gone up to NRs 19,261 based on the Basic Minimum Need (BMN) required for the minimum subsistence of an individual. This means that any household having per capita income less than NRs. 19,261 required to meet BMN of the family member is considered Below Poverty Level (BPL) households. 77. In line with the CBS criteria of consumption requirement for minimum subsistence, the poverty status of the displaced households have also been assessed by calculating per capita income from the average annual income of each displaced households. As the census data shows, of the total displaced households (389 HHs) number of displaced household fall under the below poverty line (Table 42). List of the below poverty line displaced households is included in Annex 5. Out of the total households interviewed (389), 16 households have been reported to be below poverty level. Among them 4 households of Braman/Chhetri/ fall below poverty line, 33
followed by 8 households of disadvantaged Janajati, 3 households of advantaged Janajati (Newar), 1 household of Sanyasi. Similarly, in terms of VDCs, the highest number (5) of households below poverty line have been residing in Arkhule VDC, 4 households in Nunthala VDC, and 3 households in Bamrang VDC. Salle and Diktel VDCs represent the same number (1) of households below poverty level respectively. The following Table 42 provides the detail of households below poverty level in terms of caste/ethnicity and VDC.
Table 42. Below Poverty Line Displaced Households of the Subproject Bharmin Ethnic Disadvantag Advantag S.N Sanyas Tota VDCs / Occupationa e Janajati e Janajati o i l Chhhetri l Caste(Dalit) (IP) (Newar) 1 Mahadevsthan 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 Salle 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 Arkhaule 1 0 0 3 1 5 4 Buipa 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Nunthala 0 0 4 0 0 4 6 Kharpa 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Bamrang 2 0 1 0 0 3 8 Diktel 0 0 1 0 0 1 Total 4 0 8 3 1 16
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
D. Socio-Economic Profile of Displaced Indigenous People’s Households 78. Among the 389 total displaced households, 177 households belong to Indigenous People’s (IP) with 997-population size. The proportion of displaced IP households is about 45% of the total affected households (389 HHs). The major ethnic groups of the displaced IP households are Rai —comprising 91 households, followed by Tamang -62 households, Sherpa -14 households, and Bhujel -5 households respectively. The Subproject road is also likely to be affected 21 households of ethnic occupational caste (Dalits) and 59 households of Advantage Janajati (Newars). Table 43 provides summary of displaced IP households by ethnicity and population composition.
Table 43. Displaced IP Households by Ethnicity and Population Composition Population Ethnicity/Caste No of HHs Male Female Total Bhujel 5 16 10 26 Gurung 1 1 1 2 Magar 4 14 12 26 Rai 91 280 247 527 Sherpa 14 43 36 79 Tamang 62 176 161 337 Grand Total 177 530 467 997 Source: Census Survey, July 2012 34
1. Displaced Indigenous Person by Age Group 79. The total population of the displaced indigenous household is 997 with an average household size is 5.6. Among them, the proportion of economically active age groups is 67.7% (675 –persons) followed by 6.61% aged groups (66 persons), 18.75% (187 persons) between age group of 5-15 years, and 6.9% (69 persons) under five children. Details of displaced persons by gender and age group are summarized in Table 44.
Table 44. Household and Population Distribution of Displaced Indigenous People
Less than 15-60 More than Ethinicity/Caste 5-15 Year Total 5 Years Year 60 Year Bhujel 3 3 20 26
Gurung 2 2
Magar 4 6 14 2 26 Rai 34 94 363 36 527 Sherpa 4 15 58 2 79 Tamang 24 69 220 24 337 Total 69 187 675 66 997 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
2. Literacy Status of Displaced Indigenous People (IP) 80. Of the total Displaced Indigenous People’s Population (997 persons) 13.84% (n-125) persons are illiterate, and 11.74 % (n-107) persons are just able to read and write. However, the highest percent 35.55% (n-321) population of displaced IP households have been found studying in between classes 6-10. The proportion of people obtaining higher education or above bachelor’s level has been reported to be only 4.98% (n-45). Collectively, as the census data shows, there is no significant difference between the IP and all displaced households in terms of literacy and attainment of formal education.(Table 45). Please refer the education status of the displaced household under profile information of the displaced households.
Table 45. Literacy Status of Displaced Indigenous People (IP) Population Can More read Class 1 Class SLC - Ethinicity/Caste Illiterate than Total and – 5 6-10 10+2 Bachelor Write Bhujel 2 2 8 9 2 23
Gurung 2 2
Magar 9 3 5 4 1 22
Rai 51 64 91 181 74 32 493 Sherpa 9 6 14 29 13 4 75 Tamang 56 33 72 107 36 9 313 Total 125 106 182 321 124 45 903 Percentage 13.84 11.74 20.16 35.55 13.73 4.98 100.00 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
3. Occupational Status of Displaced Indigenous Population 81. Of the total displaced indigenous population (997 persons), 859 persons (excluding below 5 years and no work) have been found engaged in different type of income generating activities. 35
Among them, 751 persons (75.33%) are engaged in agriculture followed by 46 persons (4.61 %) in business, 48 persons (4.81%) in foreign employment, 42 persons (4.21%) in service, 19 persons (1.91%) in wage labour and 5 persons, (0.5) in others Occupations. Table 46 provides details of the occupational status of displaced population of IP. Like in education status, there is also no significant difference between the IP and all displaced households in terms of their involvement in agriculture and other income generating activities. Please refer the education status of the displaced household under profile information of the displaced households.
Table 46. Occupational Status of Displaced Indigenous People
Total le
Ethnicity
Service Business WageLabour Foreign Employment HouseWife Work No Disab Others Not Involved In Occupation Any /Caste Agriculture 20 1 2 3 26 Bhujel 2 2 Gurung 21 1 4 26 Magar Rai 390 30 22 9 27 4 5 1 5 34 527 59 1 6 1 8 4 79 Sherpa 259 11 17 9 11 2 3 1 24 337 Tamang 751 42 46 19 48 6 8 3 5 69 997 Total
75.33 4.21 4.61 1.91 4.81 0.60 0.80 0.30 0.50 6.92 100.00 Percentage Source: Census Survey, July 2012
4. Land Holding Size of Displaced Indigenous Household 82. Based on the findings of census survey, all the displaced IP households have been reported owning private land and none of them is landless. Of the total displaced IP households having affect on their land 29.38 % (n-52) have been found owning less than 0.1ha, followed by 30.51% (n-54) owning 0.1ha, 22.03% (n-39) owning 0.5ha to 1ha, 14.69% (n-26) owning 1ha- 2ha, and 3.39% (n-6) owning more than 2ha of land respectively. The table below indicates that a majority of displaced IP households have owned 0.1ha to 0.5ha of land. The following (Table 47) shows the landholding pattern of displaced households. The land holding size of the displaced IP households is also not radically different compared the average land holding size of all displaced household.
36
Table 47. Land Holding Size of Displaced Household of Indigenous People
0.1 ha – 0.5 0.5 ha - 1 Ethinicity/Caste < 0_1 ha 1ha - 2ha > 2 ha Total ha ha Bhujel 1 2 2 5
Gurung 1 1
Magar 1 2 1 4
Rai 31 26 22 10 2 91 Sherpa 2 3 3 5 1 14 Tamang 17 22 12 8 3 62 Total 52 54 39 26 6 177 Percentage 29.38 30.51 22.03 14.69 3.39 100.00 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
5. Annual Income of Displaced Household of Indigenous People 83. In line with the CBS criteria, average annual household income of the sampled households has been assessed in order to estimate the number of BPL households. Based on the per capita per person of the Indigenous People’s household, foreign employment has been reported as the main source of earning of census households. The other sources of income of the census households are service, trade/business and labour followed by pension, livestock selling, agricultural products and fruits sale. The following Table 48 provides the detail of annual income of displaced households of indigenous people.
Table 48. Annual Income of Displaced Household of Indigenous People Source of Total No of Avg % Per capita Income Amount Respond Income Agricultural Products 652,000 32 11.72 20375.00 3880.95 Fruits Sales 9,000 2 0.73 4500.00 857.14 Livestock Selling 851,400 30 10.99 28380.00 5405.71 Livestock Products 164,950 9 3.30 18327.78 3491.01 Service 5,031,000 27 9.89 186333.33 35492.06 Labour 3,651,000 82 30.04 44524.39 8480.84 Trade/Business 5,661,000 33 12.09 171545.45 32675.32 Foreign Employment 9,816,000 38 13.92 258315.79 49203.01 Pension 963,200 15 5.49 64213.33 12231.11 Other 210,000 5 1.83 42000.00 8000.00 Total 27,009,550 273 100.00 98936.08 18844.97 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
E. Extent of Impact on the Structures of IP Households and Relocation Scope 84. The affected structures of the displaced IP households are temporary or semi-permanent type in terms of material used. All of these structures are situated along the corridor of existing alignment and likely to have completely loss. However, the displaced IPs may not require to be relocated in other places due to acquisition impacts. Based on the findings of census survey, of the total area of affected land parcels the displace IP households likely to lose only some portion of their private land with left over. In this sense, the displaced IP households themselves have 37
available options for shifting their affected structures either in the remaining portion of their affected private land or their another private land parcel in the same area (Table 49). Table 49.Summary on the Remaining Land Area of the Displaced IP Households
No. if Displaced IP Description on the Area of S.N. Households having Impact % Remaining Land on their Structures
1 Less than 2 Aana 2 paisa [a] 0 0.00
2 2 Aana 2 paisa- 8 Aana 3 10.71
3 8 Aana – 1 Ropani 2 7.14
4 1 Ropani – 5 Ropani 8 28.57
5 5 Ropani and Above 15 53.57
Total 28 100.00
Source: Inventories of Affected Land and Structure, Census Survey July 2012 [a] The above table has considered the minimum unit of land area to be 79.49.sq.m. equivalent to 2 anna 2 paisa in Nepalese land measurement system that can be transacted from the District Land Revenue Office (DLRO). 85. As the subproject will not lead to any adverse impacts on the identity, culture and customary livelihoods of the IPs and as the displaced IP households have their own private land in the same location it may not required preparing separate Indigenous People Plan (IPP) for the physical and socio-economic rehabilitation of the displaced IP household. Similarly, the acquisition impact also not likely to affect on their culture, life style, and existing identity as: The displaced IP households do not have any collective attachment to geographically distinct habitats or ancestral territories in the project area, and belong, in all respects, to the wider communities residing in the country, with whom they share family relations as well as cultural ties. They have no customary cultural, economic, social, or political institutions that are separate them from those of the dominant society and culture. Although some of the indigenous/ethnic groups have their own language and cultural traits collectively, they share common national culture and festivals. They use Nepali language as the common tongue and share the similar social norms and value with other non-IPs in the area.
86. Based on the socioeconomic information of the displaced households, the IP also do not have any indigenous ancestral land, forests, water, wildlife, and other natural resources for their livelihood; and they have not been following the traditional occupations like hunting, fishing, etc. Rather with some minor variance they have been found sharing same socioeconomic opportunities with other non-IP households having almost similar socio-economic indicator similar to other displaced non-IP households in terms of literacy and degree of education attainment, involvement on different occupations, and land holding status (Table 50).
38
Table 50. Comparative Key Socioeconomic Indicators of IP and All Displaced Households A. On Literacy and Educational Attainment Proportion of Displaced Proportion of all Displaced S.N. Indicators IP HHs HHs 1 Illiterate 13.83 12.46 2 Can read and write 11.74 10.94 3 Class 1-5 20.16 18.8 4 Class 6-10 35.55 31.09 5 SLC +2 13.73 15.54 6 More than Bachelor 4.98 4.6 7 Masters and above - B. On the Involvement in Different Occupation 1 Agriculture 75.33 72.0 2 Service 4.21 5.0 3 Business 4.61 6.0 4 Wage Labour 1.91 2.4 Foreign 5 Employment 4.81 5.6 6 House Wife 0.60 1.1 7 No work 0.80 0 8 Disable 0.30 0.3 9 Other 0.50 0.7 Not involved in any 10 occupation 6.12 6.6 C. On Average Land Holding Size 1 < 1ha 29.38 21.6 2 0.1 ha-0.5 ha 30.51 35.0 3 0.5-1 ha 22.03 20.6 4 1ha-2 ha 14.69 17.7 5 > 2 ha 3.39 5.1 D. On Average Annual Income (NRs.) Average Annual 1 Income based on 98936.08 109280 last year Source: Socioeconomic Profile, Table 3.9, 3.11, 3.12, 3.16 and 3.21, 3.22, 3.23, 3.24 87. In addition to the compensation for the loss of assets, the entitlement matrix of the RP, the displaced IP households requiring shifting/relocation will also be paid two months local agricultural wage for rebuilding/rehabilitation of structures plus transport allowance to cover the cost for moving structures including load-offload cost. The vulnerable squatters will also be paid for the loss of structures and transport allowance but they will not be eligible for the loss of land. Similarly, the renters/tenants of the affected commercial and residential/commercial structures will be provided one month's rental financial assistance for moving to alternative premise for reestablishing their home/business plus transfer allowance to cover the cost of shifting. For the DPs requiring shifting/relocation, the entitlement matrix also provisions; (i) a total of 90 days wage rate plus cash assistance equivalent to NRs. 10, 000 per displaced IP households for shifting and restarting their livelihood [EM: B-5 (a & b), and EM: B-6 (a & b)], (ii) skill development training according to the choices of DPs through the Supervision Consultant equivalent to NRs. 8000 per family [EM: B-5 (c) & EM: B-6 (c)], and (iii)scope of temporary employment through contractor in the construction phase [EM: B-5 (d) 8 EM: B-6 (d)]. 39
F. Community Perception and Key Issues Raised 88. The DPs and communities as a whole along the road corridor have been found quite positive towards the proposed road improvement program. Majority of them were found aware about the benefits of proposed Subproject for: (i) immediate access to reliable transport facilities to the district headquarter and beyond the district (ii) enhancement of economic activities in the area, and (iii) creating employment opportunities to the local people. Nevertheless, the local communities also shared some of their key concerns /questions on local social issues related to the proposed project. Some of the key issues raised by the local communities and suggested measures to address them are briefly described as follows (Table 51).
Table 51. Key Social Issues Related to the Subproject and Suggested Measures
S.N. Issues Raised Suggested Measures 1 Subproject will follow the existing The widening and improvement activities alignment or constructed by need to be carried out along the existing acquiring new land? alignment to minimize the acquisition impacts. 2 Construction of road may also cause Department of Roads need to coordinate loss of community forest along the with the District Forest Office and forest existing road due to acquisition of users groups at the local level in order to additional land and use of firewood mitigate/manage the likely loss of for construction activities and labors community forests involved in the construction work 3 A community Khami (a sort of All the efforts need to be made to protect monument established by the family the community building, temple and members of dead persons especially public places, and utilities. by indigenous people) statue is located along the side of existing road likely to be affected. The community water storage tank located within the CoI also to be protected it from likely damage due to vibration during construction phase and increase in vehicle movement in post construction phase 4 Other benefits to the local Local communities and organizations communities have to be encouraged to get involved in information awareness and social development program (e.g. HIV/AIDS, livelihood improvement program etc) to be carried out under the project and interested persons should to be given opportunities for the employment in construction activities 5 Program directly benefiting to women The project needs to carry out and children to be incorporated in the information and awareness program on community development program to road accident and safety to the different be carried out under the project target groups (including women and schoolchildren). Similarly, such information and awareness raising program also need to incorporate contents related to the social evils (such 40
S.N. Issues Raised Suggested Measures as gamble, alcoholism, child labour, prostitution, HIV/AIDs etc), and used of alternative energy (e.g. smoke free ovens known as "Dhuwan Rahit Chulho" for better cooking environment inside the house Source: Census Survey, July 2012 41
IV. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION
A. Consultation and Participation 89. While updating this Resettlement Plan (RP) series of formal and informal consultations, and meetings were carried out with relevant stakeholders at different levels (e.g. DoR officers at central and district level, team members of PPTF consultant, Displaced Persons including the local community and other relevant agencies at Subproject district).. Such consultation and participations with the stakeholders were mainly focused on sharing information and knowledge about the project and its activities for updating the RP. The consultation and participation activities carried out for updating the RP is based in a conceptual framework.
Table 52. Conceptual Framework for Consultation and Participation
Key Purpose Method Stakeholders To seek advice and to share the Frequent formal/informal meetings and progress and issues related to correspondence with the DoR, project the project tasks. Directorate (ADB) officials, and team members of TPPF consultants and other Central Level relevant agencies to share progress and issues related to the RP
Among other consultation and Official letter and formal and informal disclosure with the district level meeting with district level stakeholders agencies were carried for different (e.g. officials of land measurement and purposes which also include: land revenue office, district land survey To disseminate project related office, district administration office, and information and technical and other relevant district level agencies resettlement activities to be carried out in the detail design phase Discuss with the representative of district level agencies (CDO, representatives of District Land Revenue Office, District Land Survey Office etc) To assess the available width of road in field situation District Level Line Agencies To access information on religious/cultural/historical/
community assets in the project location To assess the availability of Government (Ailani) land that may not require to compensate To collect district land price To verify the land owner of the affected plots. To collect cadastral maps related to the subproject road. To identify the road alignment in the cadastral map and affected area. To collect other relevant secondary information 42
Key Purpose Method Stakeholders I. Disclosure: Group meetings/consultation, individual Information dissemination about meeting/sharing with the local the project, communities, family members of displaced households, local leader, Information dissemination about Local Communities school teachers, local business men, the project, to collect information displaced women and vulnerable groups and Project Affected on likely resettlement impacts, Households and mitigating measures, and assessing information on social perception, common social issues and collecting suggestions II. Consultation and Interview with the family members of the Meetings: sampled households through socio- economic questionnaire and group discussion with DPs and local Socio-economic collection of the communities at different places project affected families. Local Communities Census of DPs and information Listing of the households and detailing and Project Affected of their affected assets inventory of affected assets after plotting Households the road in cadastral map. Interview of the family members of affected households through census questionnaires Use if appropriate inventories to record the affected assets by DPs
B. The Stakeholders 90. ADB guidelines suggest consulting stakeholders at different level for ensuring their participation on decision-making and RP preparation/implementation. In line with the ADB guidelines, stakeholders at different levels were consulted throughout the process of preparing this RP. Some of the key objectives of stakeholder consultation are: . Assess information related to the project and associated resettlement issues; . Assess concerns of relevant stakeholders, . Ensure stakeholders involvement in RP preparation process, and . Solicit stakeholders suggestions for a meaningful resettlement planning document 91. The key stakeholders consulted in the course of preparing this RP include; (i) officials at DoR, and Project Directorate (ADB) at central level; and (ii) Officials of DoR Divisional Office, District Land Survey Office (DLSO), District Land Revenue Office (DLRO), District Development Committee, District Administration Office (DAO). Similarly, local community, DPs and their family members, local leaders, VDC representatives, and other key persons were also consulted at the Subproject location.
C. Public Consultation and Discussion 92. The public consultation and disclosure activities were mainly focused to the local communities and DPs at different location across the road alignment. The disclosure about the project activities were carried out to inform the DPs, local community and other relevant agencies , its impact and measures to be adopted by the project for mitigating the negative impact and enhancing positive impacts. The another part of the disclosure was to answer questions raised by the communities including DPs with regard to the project its activities and impacts. With a view to maintain, consistencies on the contents of response, an outline of agenda and approach for public consultation was conceptualized in advance (Table 53). Collectively, most of the agenda 43
discussed during the consultation and disclosure were related to compensation provision and its rate. The consulted people were informed about different aspects of the projects and likely resettlement impacts and mitigation measures. They were also informed about the (i) process of assessing resettlement impacts during the detail design, (ii) process of compensation determination in accordance to the Land Acquisition Act 1977 and provisions of compensation and other assistance made in the entitlement matrix. Some of the key stakeholders involved in community consultation were, also include local people, DPs and their family members, local representatives of political parties, schoolteachers, businesspersons, women, and vulnerable groups.
Table 53. Agenda and Approaches of Public Consultation Agenda Approaches Introduction Introduction of the field study team Information dissemination about Information about the project, detail study and its the project and objectives of purpose resettlement and socioeconomic Reasons of conducting census survey of the survey DPs and their affected assets and socioeconomic surveys Resettlement scope of the Scope of resettlement impacts of the projects subproject road due to the Subproject impact
Measures under taken to IP provision as per the prevailing Land address the unavoidable Acquisition Act 1977 on compensations, resettlement impacts acquisition, and resettlement Information about the legal provision of determining compensation rate by Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) to be formed under the Land Acquisition Act 1997 Activities carried out by field Process of listing the households going to be study team affected, and their assets followed by interview with respective family members Method of collecting socioeconomic information from sample households in the project location Measurement method of affected structures and recording of ownership status on inventories Process of finalizing resettlement planning document after detail design Group/individual discussion with Type of households in the area (e.g. DPs, local community, and other indigenous/ethnic, dalits and other vulnerable local stakeholders on key households like; women headed households, issues related to resettlement household with disabled members, elderly headed household, relatively poor households etc Type of Ownership of land (private, Government, (Ailani), forest, religious/cultural/community etc) in the subproject area, major crops grown etc Types of displaced households (e.g. titleholders, tenants, sharecroppers, official tenants, agriculture, encroachers etc) Type of structures ownership in the area (e.g. 44
Agenda Approaches titleholders, squatters, encroachers, land less etc) Major economic activities in the area, perception about the proposed project, willingness to support the project activities, women's issues and drudgery, Sexually transmitted Infections (STI) and HIV/AIDS, human and drug trafficking, gamble and alcoholism, potential benefits of the proposed project etc Responses to be made on the questions raised by the local communities and DPs
D. Findings of the Public Consultation and Issues Discusses 93. Among other the Public consultation and disclosure activities, have been found effective on several issues like: (i) disseminating project related information to the local communities, DPs, and other stakeholders, (ii) informing about the likely resettlement impacts and measures to be adopted to avoid/minimize such impacts, (iii) to inform about the provision and process of acquisition, compensation, rehabilitation and relocation (as applicable). It is also found fruitful on assessing local communities' perception, expectation, and suggestions related to the project. Collectively, the result of stakeholder consultation was found to be positive. Some of the key focus and feedback from the community have been summarized in Table 54.
Table 54. Key Focus and Feedbacks of Community Consultation Focus Feedbacks On ensuring the accountability Responsible staff and team willing to stay in the of census data of affected field having adequate knowledge about the assets and DPs, and effective social and resettlement issues in the rural RP implementation context need to be mobilized to implement RP The verification of RP need to be carried out with the presence of relevant representatives (land surveyor, resettlement specialist of the project, engineers, local communities and DPs) Information on the absentee DPs and their affected assets should also be included during the RP implementation On protecting community Adequate efforts need to be made during the resources (like; Khamai Statue, construction phase to protect the community Public resting places building, Khamai Statue located in Aiselukharka (chautaras), Community Water cluster of Madevsthan VDC ward no 2, and Storage Tank etc ) community water storage tank at Bhanjyang cluster of Nunthala VDC ward no. 9 If public structures are going to During construction special attention should be be affected within the CoI, such paid by PIU regarding the likely affected structures should be relocated in structures within the CoI (7.5m either side) a convenient places as should be relocated in a convenient places as requested by the local requested by the local community. community. On ensuring effective Local communities including DPs/ community compensation distribution based organization/non-governmental organization, and local land surveyor need to 45
Focus Feedbacks be involved for effective implementation of resettlement activities
E. Key Issues Raised During Social Consultation 94. The feedbacks of social consultation as summarized in above table is based on the issues discussed with the local people, DPs including indigenous people. The synopsis on the issues raised by local community and DPs involved in consultation and the response made is briefed in the following consultation matrix (Table 55). The minutes of public consultation (in Nepali) has been incorporated in Annex 6 for reference.
46
Table 55. Social Consultation Matrix
Name of Consulted Answers Given /Measures adopted in VDC/Municipality Questions/Issues Raised and Discussed Place Persons RP to Address the Issues The existing road is 6m width in an Compensation for affected land and average, and the CoI is fixed 7.5m either other assets will be paid by the side. Hence, the compensation of 4.5m Government and the compensation either side should be arranged in rate will be fixed by Compensation reasonable cost. Determination Committee (CDC) to The existing private structures, trees and be formed under the chairmanship of fruits trees will be affected due to project, the Chief District Officer (CDO) the reasonable compensation cost should The public structures likely to be be provided. affected by the project will be relocated during the implementation If public structures are going to be affected within the CoI, such structures should be phase in collaboration with local
relocated in a convenient places as community Halesi MadevsthanVDC Male : 15 requested by the local community. Ward No. 4 Female : 1 Committed to support in the construction phase The existing road is 6m width in an Compensation for affected land and average, and the CoI is fixed 7.5m either other assets will be paid by the side. Hence, the compensation of 4.5m Government and the compensation either side should be arranged in rate will be fixed by Compensation reasonable cost. Determination Committee (CDC) to Madevsthan VDC The existing private structures, trees and be formed under the chairmanship of Male :10 the Chief District Officer (CDO) Aiselukharka Ward No. 2 fruits trees will be affected due to project, Female : 0 the reasonable compensation cost should DoR will arrange necessary action to
be provided. provide the employment to the Employment opportunities should be affected people as far as possible. provided to the local during construction The DoR will pay serious attention to phase. protect as far as possible. The khamai statue, which is located within 47
Name of Consulted Answers Given /Measures adopted in VDC/Municipality Questions/Issues Raised and Discussed Place Persons RP to Address the Issues the CoI, should protect as far as possible. If public structures are going to be affected within the CoI, such structures should be relocated in a convenient places as requested by the local community. Committed to support in the construction phase
The existing road is 6m width in an Compensation for affected land and average, and the CoI is fixed 7.5m either other assets will be paid by the side. Hence, the compensation of 4.5m Government and the compensation either side should be arranged in rate will be fixed by Compensation reasonable cost. Determination Committee (CDC) to The existing private structures, trees and be formed under the chairmanship of fruits trees will be affected due to project, the Chief District Officer (CDO) the reasonable compensation cost should DoR will arrange necessary action to Arkhaule Male :13 be provided. provide the employment to the Arkhaule Ward No. 6 Female : 4 Employment opportunities should be affected people as far as possible. provided to the local during construction The DoR will pay serious attention to phase. protect as far as possible. If public structures are going to be affected within the CoI, such structures should be relocated in a convenient places as requested by the local community. Committed to support in the construction phase The existing road is 6m width in an Compensation for affected land and Male :11 average, and the CoI is fixed 7.5m either other assets will be paid by the Schooldanda Nunthala Ward No. Female : 3 side. Hence, the compensation of 4.5m Government and the compensation 4 either side should be arranged in rate will be fixed by Compensation 48
Name of Consulted Answers Given /Measures adopted in VDC/Municipality Questions/Issues Raised and Discussed Place Persons RP to Address the Issues reasonable cost. Determination Committee (CDC) to The existing private structures, trees and be formed under the chairmanship of fruits trees will be affected due to project, the Chief District Officer (CDO) the reasonable compensation cost should DoR will arrange necessary action to be provided. provide the employment to the The water storage tank and the laying pipe affected people as far as possible. located in Bhanjyang ward no 9 of The DoR will pay serious attention to Nunthala VDC should be relocated at protect the water storage tank convenient place after discussion with located in Bhanjyang ward no nine of local community. Nunthala VDC as far as possible. Employment opportunities should be provided to the local during construction phase and income generation activities should be provided to the local people especially to the displaced people. If public structures are going to be affected within the CoI, such structures should be relocated in a convenient places as requested by the local community. Committed to support in the construction phase The existing road is 6m width in an Compensation for affected land and average, and the CoI is fixed 7.5m either other assets will be paid by the side. Hence, the compensation of 4.5m Government and the compensation either side should be arranged in rate will be fixed by Compensation Diktel Ward No. 6 Male :9 reasonable cost. Determination Committee (CDC) to Karagar Female : 4 The existing private structures, trees and be formed under the chairmanship of fruits trees will be affected due to project, the Chief District Officer (CDO) the reasonable compensation cost should DoR will arrange necessary action to be provided. provide the employment to the affected people as far as possible. 49
Name of Consulted Answers Given /Measures adopted in VDC/Municipality Questions/Issues Raised and Discussed Place Persons RP to Address the Issues Employment opportunities should be The DoR will pay serious attention to provided to the local during construction protect the water storage tank phase as per the community capacity located in Bhanjyang ward no nine of If public structures are going to be affected Nunthala VDC as far as possible. within the CoI, such structures should be relocated in a convenient places as requested by the local community. Committed to support in the construction phase
50
F. Consultation and Dissemination with Indigenous People 95. The dissemination/disclosure and consultation activities carried out during the RP updating process also focused to the Indigenous People (IP) likely to be affected by the Subproject. Collectively, the displaced IP also share the same opinion as done by the PDs of other caste and ethnic groups. However, some of the key issues specially raised by the displaced IP in some Subproject location is summarized in Table 56.
51
Table 56. Consultation Matrix with the Indigenous People
Name of Consulted Answers Given /Measures adopted VDC/Municipality Questions/Issues Raised and Discussed Place Persons in RP to Address the Issues The Khamai statue is one of the cultural symbol DoR should pay special attention in of the Rai community, located at Aiselukharka order to protect the Khamai statue, cluster of Mahadevsthan VDC ward no 2, should which is cultural symbol of the protect as far as possible. Indigenous People.
Special provision of employment opportunities DoR will play key role to provide should be arranged with focusing to likely employment opportunity and Mahadevsthan, Displaced Indigenous People during construction appropriate income generation Arkhaule , and phase activities during construction phase Nunthala VDC Income generation activities appropriate to site especial focus to the Indigenous People of Displaced households. specific should be provided to the Indigenous people especially to the displaced one.
Committed to support in the construction phase
52
G. Scope of Further Consultation 96. Several additional rounds of consultations with the relevant stakeholders (district level agencies, local communities, DPs and other agencies) will be carried out in construction phase. Such consultation will carry out in collaboration with the relevant agencies (district/local level agencies, local communities, DPs, including the IPs and vulnerable groups) as needed. Some of the key activities requiring further consultation in RP processing are related to: . Disseminating information on the matters related to RP implementation; . Carrying out land measurement survey determine the area and owners of the land parcels without having official record at District land Revenue Office (DLRO).Updating the list of Displaces Persons (DPs) in accordance to the changes made on technical design, and to incorporate information from the absentees; . Identification of underlying practical issues and appropriate mitigation measures related to acquisition and compensation; . Delineation of the extent of impact on affected assets; . Supporting CDC to negotiate compensation rate; . Informing the schedule and process of compensation distribution; . Updating and preparing the records of affected assets; . Ensuring local communities and DPs representation on grievance readdress process, . Resolving the grievances; . Distributing compensation; . Relocating, readjusting, and evacuation of acquired area; . Pursuing resettlement/rehabilitation/income restoration/ conducting livelihood improvement activities;
H. Disclosure of RP 97. The project Implement Unit (PIU) will carry out following disclosure activities in order to ensure transparency and active involvement of DPs and other relevant stakeholders in resettlement planning, and implementation process: The entitlement matrix will be translated into Nepali language and will be circulated to all the displaced person. This will also be read out to the displaced persons during the consultations so that thay are fully aware about the entitlements. . The updated resettlement plan with summary will be uploaded in the website of Executing Agency (EA) and updated in accordance to revision; and . A copy of approved RP will be officially submitted to ADB to upload in ADB web. . A summary updated resettlement plan (translated into Nepal language) will be disclosed to the DPs, local community and other relevant agencies at project district during the implementation once it get finalized. 53
V. GRIEVANCES REDRESS MECHANISM
A. General 98. The project affected persons have formal recourse to the Chief District Officer and Ministry of Home Affairs in case of grievance under regulations specified under the Land Acquisition Act 1977. Further, the Sub project will set up a Grievance Redress Committee in the district and a Grievance Redress Sub-Committee at VDC level to hear complaints. Owners feeling unfairly pressurized into involuntary resettlement can complain to the official Grievance Redress Committee. A grievance process has been established in the RP and DPs who are not satisfied that compensation, replacement of lost assets and livelihoods and allowances due to them have been fairly provided are able to seek redress and to make a formal complaint ( Box 2). Box 2: Some Anticipated Grievance
. Displaced persons not listed in the entitled persons list, . Information on affected assets and extent of impact not recorded properly, . Inadequate or improper compensation provision not matching to entitlement matrix, . Disputes related to the ownership or authenticity of the submitted ownership documents . Dispute on compensating the affected assets having joint ownership, . Dispute related to variance on compensation rate for similar losses, . Dispute on getting compensation or mode of rehabilitating community assets, and so on . Dispute about the family member's share (also called Ansa in Nepali) over the affected assets
99. Land Acquisition Act, 1977, through its Clause 11 (sub clause 1,2,3,4) provisions to submit grievance by Displaced Persons (DPs), if unsatisfied with land acquisition process. Similarly, Clause 18 (sub-clause 1,2,3) of the Act provisions for filing or representing the case by DPs to the CDO and raise objection against acquisition or compensation fixed for the acquired assets by a notice to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA). In this sense, several grievances may likely to rise in RP implementation causing delay on the progress on compensation distribution. Formation of GRC is the most to reduce the pressure of grievances and cut down the lengthy litigation. As stipulated in Clause 11 of the Land Acquisition Act 1977, Chief District Officer (CDO) is responsible to give decisions on all the grievances related to land acquisition and resettlement issues. In order the facilitate the process, the Project Manager (PM) will coordinate and support the CDO as a Member Secretary on forming a Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) and addressing the grievances.
B. Formation of Grievance Redress Committee 100. The PM in close coordination with CDO, will, form a GRC at Subproject level. The other members to be included in the committee are; PM as Member Secretary and representatives from the district level line agencies (District Land Revenue Office, District Land Survey Office, Municipality or Village Development Committee, District Development Committee, District Agriculture Office, District Forest Office, and representative from other district level agencies, and other stakeholders as required). Similarly, Community Based Organizations (CBOs) in the districts, representatives of affected/ vulnerable households including women, local representatives (e.g. school teachers, health workers, businesspersons, local resource persons 54
etc), local leaders and other relevant persons. Figure 3 provides a sample organization structure of the proposed GRC.
Figure 3: Organizational Structure of GRC
Chief District Officer
Project Manager
Representatives of Line Representatives Independent Agencies including of CBOs/NGOs Representation of Municipality/VDC Affected households including Vulnerable Groups and Women
3.1.1 Subproject Level Committee
101. Subproject level committee (SLC). In order to facilitate the GRC on resolving grievances, SLCs will be established at different locations as required. The SLCs will facilitate the GRC and DPs on redressing the grievances and timely distribution of compensation. Project- affected persons including DPs of the respective VDC/Municipality, local representatives of political parties, religious leaders, vulnerable groups, and local CBOs, and other stakeholders as applicable will represent the SLC. The SLC will play coordinating role between DPs and the GRC to minimize and address the grievances. The SLC will assist the Subproject Office/PM, and Social/Resettlement Specialist of the Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) on informing people about the likely resettlement impacts, provision of compensation and other assistance to the Displaced Persons (DPs), RP implementation and grievances redressing methods as well as to solicit their view on the RP implementation. The SLC will also be responsible to inform the GRC and resettlement specialist on the grievances likely to be raised by DPs, and to minimize them with the support of GRC and local people before formal submission to the GRC.
C. Operational Mechanism 102. Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) will meet regularly (at least twice in a month or as per the requirement) on a pre-fixed date. The committee will thoroughly review the grievances submitted or expressed verbally by DPs, and will assign the responsibilities to relevant agencies on implementing the decisions of the committee. The GRC will take decisions within a fortnight of the receipt of the complain. If the DPs, not satisfied from the decision of the GRC, will have their right to take the grievance up-to the Ministry of Home Affairs. 103. Failing the addressing of grievances at Subproject level will be referred to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA). The MoHA normally require to make decision on a complaint within 15 days, unless further information is required, or unless the complaint has to be solved in a court of law (e.g. ownership disputes).The aggrieved person is free to approach the country’s legal system at any stage of the grievance redress process.The proposed grievance resolution procedure will be as shown in Figure 4 below: 55
Figure 4: Grievances Resolution Steps and Process
Dissatisfied person/party submit the grievance
Grievance reported Grievance to SLC Resolved
If not, sent to PM to investigate with the Grievance assistance of Resettlement Specialist Resolved of CSC
If unresolved, referred to CDO for Grievance resolution Resolved
If unresolved again, referred to Home Ministry for Resolution 56
VI. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK
A. The Context 104. The government of Nepal has promulgated different laws and legislations for different sectors as prescribed by the constitution of Nepal. There are different laws interrelated to each other such as for construction of road there are independent acts like road act, forest act, land act and the property right mentioned in the constitution and some guidelines to be entertained for this RP. 105. The Interim Constitution of Nepal (2007) proclaims that the state shall give priority to the protection of environment, prevention of further damage due to physical development activities by increasing the awareness of the public about environmental cleanliness, and suggesting preventive mitigation measures. 106. With respect to property rights: the constitution establishes property rights to every citizen of Nepal whereby every citizen is entitled to earn, use and sell, except for public welfare. The state will not acquire or obtain or exercise authority over individuals’ property the state will compensate for the loss of property specified specific acts. 107. Public Road Act 1974 prohibits the construction of permanent structures (buildings) in a defined distance from the rural road i.e. the road agency has the authority over everything within the Right of Way (RoW). The act makes provision for cases where the road projects temporarily require land and/or other properties during construction, rehabilitation and maintenance. A compensation fixation committee (CFC) determines compensation in case of loss of assets, business or production. 108. The act empowers DoR to acquire any land on temporary basis during construction and upgrading. The act does not provide for leasing of land. DoR required to pay compensation for any damages caused to buildings, crops and trees, where the farming activities of the landowner id interrupted, and where the landowner has to incur expansions to restore the land after its return. Compensation is determined between DOR and titleholder, or through mediation, involving officials from the relevant VDC and district. 109. Land Acquisition Act 1977, and its subsequent amendment in 1993 specify procedures of acquiring land and payment of compensation for such acquired land and other assets. The Act empowers Government to acquire any land, on the payment of compensation for public purposes or for the operation of any development project initiated by the Government institutions. The legal provision and practices ensure that people have right to get compensation for any type of losses due to development activities to safeguard the economic future of all Displaced Persons (DPs). Land Acquisition Act ensures assessment, valuation and compensation for any acquisition of private properties. 110. Land acquisition, compensation and resettlement in Nepal, is still considered as a project based activity. As there is lack of a single national level policy to deal on resettlement issues, it is mainly guided by Land Acquisition Act 1977, supported by other various sectoral Acts (e.g. Immovable Property Acquisition Act 1956, Land Reform Act 1963, Water Resources Act 1992, Electricity Act 1992/Rule 1993, Civil Aviation Authority Act 1997, Environmental Protection Act 1997 etc) as necessary. At present, infrastructures including roads, hydro-electricity, irrigation, civil aviation and industrial projects are some of the main sectors requiring land acquisition. Since eighties, development projects in Nepal have also been guided by the respective policies of several bilateral and multilateral funding agencies (like ADB and WB, GTZ, SDC) on case-to-case basis according to the need of projects. This practice contributed to result variations on entitling compensation and other assistances to the DPs for the losses of their assets. In consideration to such underlying issues and policy gaps, Government of Nepal has drafted a National Policy on Land Acquisition, Compensation and Resettlement in Development Projects in 2006 with the 57
technical assistance of ADB TA 4422 NEP. However, the policy has yet to be approved. It is therefore, until now, Land Acquisition Act 1977 is the core document to guide on the matters related to resettlement in the country. The following subsections describe the legal frameworks for land acquisition based on Government Acts and ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009).
B. Land Acquisition Act 111. Highlights on some of the key resettlement and compensation provisions as stipulated in Land Acquisition Act 1977 have been briefly illustrated as follows: . Government can acquire land for any public purpose (Clause 3&4 of the Land Acquisition Act); . Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) shall be responsible to identify, survey, and notification to the concerned parties and other works related to acquisition (Clause 5&6); . The LAO shall determine the amount of compensation for the damaged property while conducting initial survey works (Clause 7); . Within 15 days after the preliminary actions, the LAO has to confirm the required land and submit other details of the required property to the Chief District Officer (CDO); . The CDO to publish public notification with details of the affected property after receiving the report of the preliminary activities (Clause 9); . Any grievances to disable land and property acquisition could be reported to Home Ministry within 7 days of public notification to CDO. Home Ministry is to decide on the grievances within 15 days as a capacity of district court (Clause 11); . Preliminary hearing of grievances/cases related to the Act shall be done by CDO. Appeal to such hearing could be made to the appeal court within 35 days (Clause 40); . Upon addressing the grievances CDO can hold the land for acquisition (Clause 12); . Compensation for the acquired land / property to be decided by a Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) comprising of Chief District Officer, Land Revenue Officer, Project Manager, and representatives of the District Development Committee. The compensation to be paid in cash and separate compensation rates could be fixed for the partially affected land or completely affected land (Clause 13); The overall responsibilities of LAO, as provisioned in Land Acquisitions Act, is to prepare a detailed plan, however, the CDC is the final authority that determines all types of cost regarding the assets. LAO is an individual or team, and CDC is the body under whose direction he acts, and which evaluates, discusses, approves, improves or rejects the plan and recommendations of the LAO. . Official tenant to be paid compensation as per the prevailing laws (Clause 20); . Unpaid Government tax could be deducted from the compensation amount (Clause 21).
C. ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement,2009 112. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009, and Guidelines for Involuntary Resettlement is mandatory for all ADB assisted Projects to recognize and address the Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) impacts of all the Displaced Persons (DPs) irrespective of their titles and requires for the preparation of an appropriate Resettlement Plan (RP) in the case where involuntary resettlement exists. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) is the guiding rule to identify impacts and to plan measures for mitigating various losses likely to occur due to resettlement impacts. Some of the key provisions of ADB SPS and Guidelines on Involuntary Resettlement are: . Where Involuntary Resettlement (IR) is unavoidable, the impact should be minimized by exploring project and design alternatives; . Enhance or at least restore the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real terms relative to pre-project levels; 58
. Improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups; . Gender analysis is required to identify related resettlement impacts and risks; . Resettlement Plans (RP) should be prepared in full consultation with Displaced Persons (DPs), host communities, and stakeholders; . Preference will be given to land-based resettlement for displaced persons whose livelihoods are land-based. However, if the land is not the preferred option or the land is not available at reasonable price, the DPs will be provided opportunities for employment, or self employment in the project works, in addition to the reasonable cash compensation for land and other assets lost; . Cash compensations for the loss of structures, other assets and incomes should be based on full replacement cost; . Absence of formal legal title to land or non-recognized or recognizable claims to such land by the Displaced Persons (DPs) should not be a bar to compensation; . The rate of compensation for land, structures and other assets should be calculated at full replacement cost based on fair market value; transaction cost; interest accrued; transitional and restoration cost, and other applicable payments, if any. . All compensation payments and related activities must be completed prior to the commencement of the civil work; . Special attention to be paid to the needs of vulnerable groups especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children and indigenous people and those without legal title to land.
D. Gaps between ADB and GON Resettlement Policy and Bridging Measures 113. Though apparently, both Land Acquisition Act 1977 and ADB Guidelines aims to ensure compensation to the DPs for the loss of properties and other assets, there are some differences on their entitlement provisions (Table 57):
Table 57. Key Policy Gaps and Bridging Measures Key Policy Measures Adopted ADB SPS (2009) Government Laws Gaps in this RP Compensati All the compensation is Compensation rate will Provisions have on Principle based on the principle be determined by CDC, been made for of replacement cost. consisting of (i) CDO, the replacement (ii) representative from cost for the loss DDC (iii)Chief of Land of land, Revenue Office (iv) houses/structures Project Manager, (Land ; subject to be Acquisition Act Clause finalized by CDC. 13) DPs are allowed The Land Acquisition to take salvaged Act 1977, also mention materials. the need of considering CDC will make periodic circulations final decision on issued by the GoN while the compensation fixing compensation for rates after the affected assets reviewing and (Land Acquisition Act verification of Clause 16) affected assets Focus to Focused on the poor Apparently, the Land Provisions have Vulnerable and vulnerable group to Acquisition Act 1977 been made for 59
Key Policy Measures Adopted ADB SPS (2009) Government Laws Gaps in this RP Groups avoid future does not mention about income impoverishment and this. However, the restoration create new Interim Constitution of program and opportunities Nepal through its Article other financial 13 does not restrict to assistance make such provisions for uplifting the vulnerable groups (like; women, dalits, indigenous/ethnic people, Madhesi, poor farmers, land less labours, and other socially and economically disadvantaged groups including children and physically and mentally incapable persons) Focus on Full respect for Apparently the LA Act Provisions have indigeneous indigeneous peoples’ 1977 doen not mention been made for People identity, dignity, human about this however the income rights, livelihood interim Constitution of restorations if the systems, and cultural Nepal through its Acticle IPs are uniqueness as defined 13 does not restrict to economically by the indigeneous make such provisions vulnerable people themselves. for uplifting ethnic/ indigeneous people
Provision have Squatters/ vulnerable Do not consider Compensati been made for encroachers/non- title squatters/ encroachers/ on for Non- compensation to holders are entitled to non-titled land users for titleholders the vulnerable the payment for compensation non-titleholders affected having affect on structures/houses/ structures business/crops, trees, and other assistance Relocation All the eligible DPs LA Act Clause 16-2(ga) Provision have Assistance including tenants, provisions to consider been made for employees are entitled extent of losses caused the transitional to receive financial due to relocation/shifting allowances, assistance to cover of Displaced people, transport physical and while fixing the allowances and 60
Key Policy Measures Adopted ADB SPS (2009) Government Laws Gaps in this RP economical compensation rate (LA one time financial displacement Act Clause 16-2(ga) assistance to the tenants, employees Income Income restoration Apparently, the Land Provision have Restoration program such as Acquisition Act 1977, do been made to training Full and respect other for not considerApparently, for income the Land provide training measures indigenous to restore peoples’ restoration. Acquisition Act 1977 and measures in and improveidentity, dignity, the does not mention thebeen EM made for standard ofhuman living rights,of the about this. However, income restoration displaced livelihood households the Interim of those having more than 10 % of the total landholdings and income
E. Resettlement Principles and Assistance for the Proposed Project 114. Land Acquisition Act 1977, Clause 16 (a) stipulates to consider Government Guidelines, decisions, and circulations issued time to time with regard to valuation of assets and compensation determination. Accordingly, the resettlement principles adopted for this Subproject also recognizes both, the Land Acquisition Act 1977, and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 and Involuntary Resettlement Policy. In order to bridge the gaps between the Government and ADB Policies, the resettlement principles adopted in this project will provide compensation and resettlement assistance to all Displaced Persons (DPs) and their affected assets in accordance to Land Acquisition Act 1977 also considering other relevant Government Acts, policies and practices being adopted in the implemented and ongoing road projects. Based on the above policy features, the principles of R&R for this Project will entail the followings: . The negative impacts of the Project will be avoided or minimized as much as possible; . Where the negative impacts are unavoidable, the DPs will be assisted on improving or regaining their standard of living. Vulnerable groups will be identified and assisted to improve their standard of living; . Land replacement11/or cash compensation at replacement costs based on current market rate to the DPs subject to be fixed by CDC; . Cash compensation for all affected structures (residential/residential-cum commercial and other structures) affected by the project at replacement cost subject to be determined by CDC; . Assistance will be provided to the owners of structures and non-titleholders, who may incur loss of ability to maintain livelihood during relocation and resettlement; . Rehabilitation assistance i.e.; compensation for lost business and workdays (including employees) due to relocation and disruption of business enterprise; . Compensation and R&R assistance will be made in accordance with this policy before taking possession of the acquired lands and properties; . Appropriate mechanism will be established at the district as well as local level to ensure speedy resolution of grievance and disputes;
11 There is also provision of land for land compensation to the DPs having complete loss of their land only if Government land is available in the area (Land Acquisition Act 1977, Clause 14) 61
. All activities related to resettlement planning, implementation, and monitoring will be ensured through involvement of women, other vulnerable and DPs.
F. Cut-off Date 115. In the case of land acquisition, the date of publication of preliminary notification for acquisition as provisioned by Land Acquisition Act 1977 will be treated as the cut-off date. For the non-titleholders such as squatters and encroachers, the cut-off date is the date of project census completed for this RP (July, 2012) 62
VII. ENTITLEMENTS ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS
A. Entitlement Policy and Matrix 116. This chapter reviews the policy framework that applies to the project. Land Acquisition Act (LAA) 1977, compatible with the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009, guides resettlement Plan (RP). According to The Land Acquisition Act 2034, if the Government of Nepal (GoN) or any party acquire portion of land of the public it should pay compensation or on the negotiation for public purposes and works. The RP provisions compensations to the DPs for all types of losses. In addition to the compensation for affected assets, the DPs will also receive other cash grants and resettlement assistance such as; shifting allowance, loss of workdays, income restoration, and additional financial assistance to the vulnerable DPs; such as household headed by women, disabled persons, ethnic groups, and household living below poverty level. The DPs under the project will be compensated at full replacement cost based on current market price to be determined by Compensation Determination Committee (CDC). The entitlement matrix (Table 58) provides details regarding the application of the principles, definition of entitled persons, and entitlements. Description on compensation provisions and other financial assistance made for different items are discussed in the following subsections based on the provisions made in the Entitlement Matrix (EM).
B. Compensations Provisions 117. Compensation for land acquisition. One time cash compensation to the DPs at replacement cost for the permanently acquired private land (homestead, agricultural lowland, agricultural upland, fallow land and others), in accordance to the provision in Land Acquisition Act 1977. In the Act, there is also option of land for land compensation only if, Government land is available in the area12. Compensation for land will be given at local market value/replacement cost to be determined by CDC13 [Ref. EM: A- 1 (a, b, c)]. Permanent tenants/sharecroppers will receive 50 % cash compensation for the loss of tenancy due to acquisition of land. All the fees, taxes incurred in the relocation will be borne by the project.
C. Compensation for the Loss of Income Generating Assets
1. Loss of Income by Agricultural Crops, and Fruit and Non-fruit Trees 118. Cash compensation for the loss of agricultural crops at current market value of mature crops based on average production subject to be fixed by CDC [EM:B-1 (a & b)]. For the loss of fruit trees, compensation will be paid for the next 5 to 15 years based on fruit bearing years and average fruit production with the support of District Agriculture Office (DAO), if required [EM: B-1]. Similarly, the CDC may seek support from District Forest Office (DFO) while fixing compensation for other trees.
2. Loss of Business in the Affected Structures 119. One time lump-sum grant equivalent to minimum one-month's income based on nature of business and types of losses to be paid on case-to-case basis [EM: B-2 (a)].
12 Clause 14 of the Land Acquisition Act 1977 also provisions of land for land compensation, only if, Government land is available in the area. 13 Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) to be formed under the chair of Chief District Officer (CDO) 63
3. Loss of Business Premises 120. One time cash assistance to the owners or renters equivalent to two months income based on the nature of business including shifting allowance on actual cost basis [EM: B-3 (a, b, & c)] .
4. Loss of Wage by Employee 121. The employees affected due to resettlement impact on structure and business will be provided one time financial assistance equivalent to 90 days wages rate as determined by CDC [EM: B-4 (a & b)].
D. Additional Assistance to Vulnerable Groups 122. Affected households having: (i) significant resettlement impacts, (ii) household with disabled member, (iii) household headed by women, (iv) ethnic occupational caste (Dalit) groups, (v) endangered ethnic groups (vi) elderly headed households (vii) officially below poverty level households are considered as vulnerable in this RP. The entitlement matrix provisions cash compensation for such vulnerable households for 90 days wage rate plus cash assistance equivalent to NRs. 10,000 per households for restarting their livelihood [EM: B-5 (a & b), and EM: B-6 (a & b)] .
E. Livelihood Assistance and Skill Development Training 123. Households having more than 10% loss of total holdings of agricultural land/income, complete loss of residential structures, and vulnerable groups will be provided skill development training according to the choices of DPs and locally available training packages through the Supervision Consultant equivalent to NRs. 8000 per family. [EM: B-5 (c) & EM: B-6 (c)]
F. Temporary Employment in the Project 124. Displaced persons from vulnerable and significantly affected households will also be encouraged for temporary employment for semi-skilled and non-skilled works in the project through the contactors [EM: B-5 (d) 8 EM: B-6 (d)].
G. Compensation for the Loss of Residential/Commercial Structures
1. Compensation for the Owners (titleholders/squatters/encroachers) 125. One time cash compensations for the affected structures used as residential, commercial and other utilities (e.g. toilet, well, cattle shed etc) will be paid to DPs at full replacement costs to be fixed by CDC at replacement value [EM: C-1 (a)]. The vulnerable squatters/encroachers will also be eligible to get assistance for the loss of structures/assets at full replacement costs [EM: C- 2 (a)]. Owners of the affected structures will be allowed to take/reuse all the salvageable materials for rebuilding/rehabilitation of the structures without any deduction from the compensation amount [EM: C-1 (b) & EM: C-2 (b)]. 126. In the cases of requiring rebuilding and rehabilitation, the DPs will be paid two months local agricultural wage for rebuilding/rehabilitation of structures plus transport allowance to cover the cost for moving structures including load-offload cost. The vulnerable squatters will also be paid for the loss of structures and transport allowance but they will not be eligible for the loss of land [EM: C-1 (c)].
2. Compensation for the Loss of Residential/Commercial Structures by Tenants 127. The renters/tenants of the affected residential/commercial structures will be provided one month's rental financial assistance for moving to alternative premise for reestablishing their home/business plus transfer allowance to cover the cost of shifting [EM: C-3 (a & b)]. 64
H. Loss of Cultural & Community Structures/Land/Facilities 128. The religious/cultural/community structures affected due to acquisition and construction activities will be constructed/rehabilitated or provided cash compensation to the recognized patron/custodian [EM: C-4].
I. Unanticipated Adverse Impacts 129. Any unanticipated consequences of the project during and after the implementation phase will be dealt by the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) in accordance to the principles of the Entitlement Matrix.
J. Relocation and Income Restoration 130. Relocation of households losing structures. The resettlement impact of the proposed Subproject is mainly concentrated on agricultural land and few structures, and the acquisition will be limited within fifteen meter's Corridor of Impact (CoI). Therefore, the magnitude of impact is anticipated to be low; thus, may not require relocation. Most of the households likely to lose only small strips of land and will have options of relocating their structure in the remaining land occupied by them. The titleholders will be paid compensation for the losses of their land and structures. The non-titleholders will also be paid compensation for the loss of their structures as per the Government norms and this will enable them to relocate in the place of their choice. The displaced persons, in addition to the compensation will receive all benefits as mentioned in the entitlement matrix. Consultation with affected households revealed that they would opt for self- relocation and would require the Government to pay compensation at replacement value for their affected assets.
Table 58. Entitlement Matrix
Item Type of Result in Application Definition of DP Entitlements Responsibility No Losses Action Loss of Land A-1 Loss of Additional Person(s) with a) Cash compensation based on replacement cost Compensation DoR and CDO agricultural/ land and land records b) Subject to the availability of land, Displaced Persons for lost assets residential/ other assets verifying (DPs) may opt for replacement land of a similar commercial required for ownership productive quality and location instead of cash land by construction compensation landowners and c) All fees, taxes and other charges as applicable under improvement the relevant laws, incurred in the relocation and works beyond resource establishment are to be borne by the project the existing road
A-2 Loss of land Land Person(s) with a) Contractors to negotiate a contract agreement on the Compensation DoR /CDC/SC/ temporarily for acquired land records rental rate with the owner for temporary acquisition of for temporary Contractor the use of temporarily verifying land loss of assets contractors by ownership b) Project and the contractor to ensure that persons during contractors other than the owner affected as a result of temporary construction acquisition are compensated for the temporary period c) Land should be returned to the owner at the end of temporary acquisition period, and restored to its original condition or improved as agreed with the DP.
Loss of Income Generating Assets
66
Item Type of Result in Application Definition of DP Entitlements Responsibility No Losses Action B-1 Loss of Land Owner of crops or a) Advance notice of 1 month to be provided to DPs to Cash income for DoR, CDO agricultural purchased or trees (includes harvest their crops lost crops/trees crops, and reclaimed for crops /trees b) Cash compensation for loss of agricultural crops at fodder trees, road owned by current market value of mature crops, based on fruit trees and purposes encroachers/ average production timber trees by squatters) c) Compensation for loss of fruit bearing trees for owner average fruit production, based on its types and fruit bearing year for next 15 years to be computed at current market value d) Compensation for loss of wood-trees at current market value of wood (timber or firewood, as the case may be) B-2 Loss of income Business Owner of business a) One-time lump sum grant; minimum one-month’s Short-term DoR, CDO and by structure adversely / business tenants income based on the nature of business and type of compensation Supervision owner / tenants affected by losses assessed on a case-to-case basis for loss of Consultant for conducting road income business construction B-3 Loss of Structure on Owner /renter of a) One-time cash assistance equivalent to two-month’s Removal DoR, CDO and business acquired land business income based on the nature of business for re- /relocation Supervision premises by and/or legally establishing the businesses at the alternative premise assistance Consultant owners/renters confirmed b) Shifting allowance (transport plus loading/unloading ownership charges) will be paid to affected businessmen (if rights applicable), on actual cost basis c) The amount of deposit or advance payment paid by the business tenant to the landlord will be deducted from the payment of the landlord
Item Type of Result in Application Definition of DP Entitlements Responsibility No Losses Action B-4 Loss of wages Income Employees of a) One-time financial assistance to hired employees Short-term DoR, CDO and by employees reduced business equivalent to 90 days wages to be computed on the compensation Supervision during period basis of local wage rates as determined by for loss of Consultant of Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) income readjustment formed under CDOs for respective district for respective categories. b) DPs who are eligible for semi-skilled and unskilled labor will be given priority employment opportunities in the Project’s implementation works B-5 Additional Household Women-headed a) Cash assistance for 90 days at the local Income DoR, CDO and assistance to income households; agricultural wage rate for respective district restoration Supervision vulnerable affected as a Household with b) Special assistance of NRs. 10,000 to the assistance Consultant groups result of road Disable members affected vulnerable persons for restoring their construction and Elderly livelihoods headed
households; Ethnic Occupational Caste (Dalit); endangered groups; officially below poverty level households c) Skill development training per family to be organized by Supervision Consultant for any productive activity at the rate of NRs. 8,000 d) Temporary employment in the project construction work to DPs with particular attention to DPs who consider as vulnerable group by the project contractor to the extent possible
68
Item Type of Result in Application Definition of DP Entitlements Responsibility No Losses Action B-6 Livelihood Severely Family having a) Cash assistance for 90 days at the local agricultural Income DoR, CDO and assistance and affected more than 10% wage rate restoration Supervision skill Families loss of total land b) One-time economic rehabilitation grant of NRs. assistance Consultant development or income holding 10,000 training to the affected by the c) Skill development training per family to be organized family having project; absentee by Supervision Consultant for any productive activity significant loss landlords will not at the rate of NRs. 8,000 of property and eligible for this income sources provision d) Temporary employment in the project construction work to DPs with particular attention to DPs who live under poverty line by the project contractor to the extent possible e) This title will be implacable if the household who lose more than 10% will be dependent on the land and household occupation will be agriculture ((this will be applicable after verification from DLRO during implementation phase) Loss of Residential, Commercial, Community Property C-1 Loss of Land on Owners of the a) Cash compensation for loss of structures at Restoration of DoR and CDO residential which structure replacement cost. residence / structures and property b) Owners of affected structures will be allowed to shop. commercial stands take/reuse their salvageable materials for structures by purchased or rebuilding/rehabilitation of structure without deducting owners reclaimed for any costs. including road squatters purposes
Item Type of Result in Application Definition of DP Entitlements Responsibility No Losses Action c) In case of relocation, transfer allowance to cover cost of shifting (transport plus loading/unloading) the effects and materials will be paid on actual cost basis or on current market rates. d) Owner of the fully affected structure will be paid lumsum NRs 10,000 as displacement allowance e) In case of rebuilding/rehabilitation of structure, DP will be paid 2 months cash assistance at the local agricultural wage rate as a transitional allowance to cover lost of time and income. f) Assistance from the project to locate alternative plot for relocation; OR relocation to a resettlement site developed by the project if opted by DP C-2 Loss of Owners of the a) Compensation for structure (but not for land) at Restoration of DoR, CDO and residential structure replacement cost to the vulnerable person only. residence / Supervision structures and b) Shifting allowance will be provided to the structure shop. Consultant commercial owner on the actual basis structures by c) Encroachers will be notified a time in which to encroachers remove their assets to be affected. d) Encroachers who are vulnerable /below poverty line to be assisted case-by-case considering relevant facts on family income and existing assets
C-3 Loss of Renters of house / a) Rental assistance equivalent to 1 month rent moving Assistance to DoR, CDO and residential / commercial to alternate premise make Supervision commercial structure b) Transfer allowance to cover cost of shifting (transport alternative Consultant structures by plus loading/unloading) personal effects paid on arrangement tenants actual cost basis or on current market rates (Renters)
70
Item Type of Result in Application Definition of DP Entitlements Responsibility No Losses Action
C-4 Loss of cultural Monastery/Temple a) Complete rehabilitation/restoration by the Project; or, Replacement DoR, CDO and & community / Religious Tree/ cash compensation for restoring affected /restoration of Supervision structures community cultural/community structures and installations, to the structure Consultant /land/facilities land/Graveyard recognized patron/custodian /facility
Unanticipated adverse The EAs and project implementation authorities will deal with any unanticipated consequence of the project during and after project impact due to project implementation in the light and spirit of the principle of the entitlement matrix. intervention or associated activity Notes: (i) DP- Displace Person; (ii) DoR- Department of Roads; (iii) CDO-Chief District Officer, the core responsible authority to implement Resettlement activities in each administrative district of Nepal; (iv) LA Act - Land Acquisition Act 1977; (v) CDC-Compensation Determination Committee to be formed under the chair of CDO to implement RP • Considering the diverse cultures, races, languages and customs, the Constitution of Nepal, 1990, has recognized the endangered group (Bankariya, Kusunda, Kushbadia, Raute, Surel, Hayu, Raji, Kisan, Lepcha, Meche) and tribes in the country. The same norms has been followed in the interim constitution, 2007 • Official below poverty households having per capita less than NRs. 19,261 was determined as below poverty households (Year 2010 - 2011).
VIII. RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION
A. Need for Rehabilitation 131. In resettlement planning relocation, rehabilitation and income restoration are required if there is significant resettlement impact due to (i) Acquisition of cultivating land in large scale (ii) Displacement of structures, (iii) Loss of business and employment, (iv)) Displacement of vulnerable households, and ( v) relocation need of community assets/ properties14 etc. 132. As the findings of detail census in the Subproject locations shows, there is significant of structures, loss on the livelihood and income/employment due to impact on 106 different types of structures (residential, residential cum commercial and commercial structures). Of the total displaced households, having impact on their assets there are also identified 180 vulnerable households (Table 59).
Table 59.Displace Household by Different Vulnerability Types
S.N. Vulnerable Categories No of Households
1 Women Headed Households 20 2 Households with Disable Members 6 3 Ethnic Occupational Caste (Dalit) 21 4 Endangered Groups 0 5 Elderly Headed Households 7 6 Below Poverty line 16 Total 70
Source: Census Survey, July 2012 133. Similarly, implementation of the Subproject road also likely to affect different community property resources. like; Khamai Staute- located at Mahadevsthan VDC-1 at Aiselukharka cluster, and the community school’s Water Tank at Bhanjyang cluster of Nunthala VDC-9 etc. These community properties need to be relocated during the implementation phase in close coordination and collaboration with the local community. Therefore, the RP also provisions relocation, rehabilitation and income restoration strategies for the displaced persons as needed. 134. Based on the findings of census survey, all the displaced household having affect on their structure and vulnerable household opted for cash compensation and other assistance to be provisioned by the project for their relocation/rehabilitation. Accordingly, the RP has provisioned relocation/rehabilitation strategy for the DPs having significant resettlement impacts.
B. Rehabilitation Strategy 135. The rehabilitation strategy followed for this subproject is guided by the entitlement matrix provided in the project RP. The following specific measures have been provisioned in this RP for relocating/rehabilitating and restoring the significantly affected assets and DPs:
14 The involuntary resettlement requirements apply to full or partial, permanent or temporary physical displacement (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and economic displacement (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) resulting from (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. (ADB SPS 2009, Page 44, paragraph 5)
72
1. Rehabilitation/Relocation Strategies for the Affect on Land DPs having impact on land will be compensated at replacement cost to be determined by the Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) The nontitled will also be compensated for the loss of crops and tree at the rate to be fixed by CDC.
2. Loss of Residential/Commercial Structures 136. The compensation for the loss of residential/commercial structures will be as below: Cash compensation for loss of structures at replacement value to be fixed by CDC.; Two months local agricultural wage rate for rebuilding/ rehabilitation of structures. Transport allowance to cover the cost of moving structures including loading/uploading of materials; Squatters/encroachers, if vulnerable, will be eligible for compensation for the loss of structures and also entitled for transport allowance, but not be eligible for the loss of land; Owners will be allowed to take/reuse the salvaged materials for rebuilding structures
3. Assistance for Tenants 137. There is a provision that the renter of house/commercial structures will receive a rental assistance equivalent to one month rent to moving to alternative premise for reestablishing house/business.;
4. Income Restoration Assistance 138. Besides the compensation for land and structures, the following will be the income restoration assistance to the SPAF: Family having more than 10 % loss of total land holdings or income will be considered as severely affected families. Such family will receive cash assistance equivalent to 90 days local wage rate and one time economic rehabilitation grant of Rs. 10,000. Additional assistance to vulnerable groups. Such groups will receive cash assistance for 90 days at the local wage rate and special assistance of NRs 10,000 for restoring their livelihoods; One time financial assistance to hired employees equivalent to 90 days wages rate as determined by CDC. One time cash assistance of minimum one month to kiosk on the nature of business and type of losses assessed on case-to case basis. Skill development training equivalent to NRs 8,000/ family will be provided to the DPs having more than 10% loss of total holding or income and to the vulnerable persons. RS will conduct need assessment and will organize skill development program according to the DPs.
5. Reconstruction of Cultural/Community Structures/Facilities 139. The project will reconstruct or rehabilitate the community /cultural structures or cash compensation will be provided to the recognized patron/custodian.
6. Unanticipated Adverse Impact 140. The project implementation authorities will deal with any unanticipated consequences of the project during and after project implementation according to the principle of Entitlement matrix.
IX. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN 141. The Government will bear all the costs required to implement land acquisition and resettlement activities. Ministry of Physical Planning, Works and Transport Management and DoR are committed to set aside and provide the respective amounts of funds for RP implementation in an efficient and timely manner. MPPWTM and DOR will guarantee to meet unforeseen obligations in excess budget estimates. 142. Land Acquisition Act 1977 and Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 (ADB) are the core document to guide on resettlement activities including the valuation of affected assets and determining compensation rate.
A. The Preliminary Valuation and Cost Estimate 143. This RP has updated based on the enumeration of Displaced Persons (DPs) and their affected assets along the corridor of Subproject road by conducting detail census survey in the month of July 2012. The valuation of affected assets and compensation rate estimated for the loss of major assets (land and structures) is based on market rate subject to be finalized by CDC in accordance to the provision of Land Acquisition Act. The other costs required for financial assistance (e.g. loss of business, wage, assistance to vulnerable groups etc have been calculated based on Entitlement Matrix (EM) prepared for ADB funded Sub regional Transport Enhancement Project (STEP). Some of the basis considered for valuating affected assets and preliminary cost estimate for compensation is given in Table 60. Methods adopted to estimate compensation costs for the affects are given in Annex 7.
Table 60. Basis Considered for the Valuation and Cost Estimate for Key Assets S.N Cost Items Basis Taken 1 Cost for Land Calculated the area of land to be acquired based on detail design and cadastral survey and (ii) calculated the rate of compensation at full replacement costs, i.e. market price, transaction costs, etc. subject to be determined by CDC 2 Loss of Crops Calculated the area of land to be acquired, and (ii) average quantity of major crops grown (iii), Calculated the cost of crops value based on the retail market price based on the rate of Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives subject to be determined by CDC 3 Loss of Fruit (i) Inventoried the affected fruit trees to be acquired (ii) Growing Trees Calculated the five to fifteen year production based on fruit bearing years and average annual production quantity (iii) allocated the budget based on the market price per unit and multiply for the five to fifteen years production based on the fruit bearing years subject to be finalized by CDC. See Annex 7.2 for the cost calculated for compensating the affected trees. 4 Loss of Fodder (i) Inventoried the number of different types of fodder trees Trees based on the road design, (ii) Calculated the five year production based on yearly production after the consultation with local people, (iii) allocated the budget based on the market price per unit and multiply the five year production (Per unit cost is defined after the consultation with District Agricultural Official). See Annex 5 subject to be finalized by
74
S.N Cost Items Basis Taken CDC 5 Loss of Timber (i) Inventoried the number of different types of timber trees, (ii) Trees allocated lump-sum cost to estimate the valued of affected timber trees in consultation with the DPs subject to be finalized by CDC 6 Loss of (i) Enumerated the number of structures by construction type residential/ (ii) estimated the value of each structure based on the rate commercial defined after the consultation with the district technical officials structures and subject to be finalized by CDC. See Annex 7.1 for the cost associated calculated for compensating the affected structures utilities
1. Cost for Land Acquisition 144. The task of land valuation is a bit tricky in Nepal. There appear two different types of valuation systems; (i) based on Government rate, and (ii) based on current local market rate. As being practiced, Government rate use to be fixed by District Land Revenue Office (DLRO)15 in accordance to the location of land, type of land, the rate of land quoted on the current land transaction documents and land revenue paid by the public. However, in practice, generally land transactions do not reflect the actual negotiated amount in the official transaction document mainly to lessen the size of revenue amount payable to the Government. This sort of malpractices has been considered one of the constraints to the Government to be officially informed/updated about the current land price in local markets. In this sense, the Government land price may not always represent the market price. Generally, local market price is volatile and may radically differ depending upon the situations and urgency of client/customer's need for transactions. Consequently, land transactions used to be made only after bargaining between buyers and sellers, and some time even with the involvements of land brokers. Given the context, the valuation of affected land is calculated being based on the local market rate with the reference of transaction documents. Table 61 provides a summary of the estimated compensation for the loss of land (EM: A-1, 2).
Table 61. Estimated Compensation Cost for Land
Land Use Area to be Acquired (Sq. Meter) Amount (NRS) Homestead 71,653.00 71,819,700.00 Upland 114,806.60 104,526,615.00 Fallow Land 7,942.40 5,999,865.00 Total 182,346,180.00
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
15 There are District Land Revenue Offices (DLRO) in all (75) district and responsible for also fixing land price of the respective districts based on land transaction made in the district and update them annually.
2. Compensation for the Loss of Income Generating Assets
a. Compensation Cost for the Loss of Agricultural Crops 145. In accordance to entitlement matrix (EM:B-1 (a & b), provision of cash compensation has been made for the likely loss of standing crops. The compensation cost has been calculated (Table 62) based on the area of land to be acquired, average quantity of major crops grown in the area, and average market rate based on a standard units prescribed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (MoAC)16. The compensation rate for the loss of standing crops, however, to be finalized by CDC with the support of District Agriculture Office (DAO) as needed. Details on estimated compensation cost for the loss of crops is in Annex 7.
Table 62. Estimated Compensation Cost for Loss of Standing Crops Affected Agricultural Estimated Value of Lost Crops in Local Land Area (ha) Production (kg) Market (NRs.) 14.7 48269.48 1,276,245.05
Source: Census Survey, July, 2012
b. Compensation Cost for the Loss of Private Trees 146. As provisioned in the entitlement matrix (EM: B-1 (c & d), and B-2 (a,b,c), compensation provision has been made for the loss of trees and plants. Generally, CDC does fixation of compensation rate for the trees/plants with the support of District Forest Office (DFO) for non-fruit trees, and District Agriculture Office (DAO) for fruit trees during the implementation phase. Therefore, the preliminary costs for the loss of trees have been calculated based on the consultation with the local community and officials of Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives and Department of Forest at the central level by adopting a thumb rule. However, the estimated cost has to be finalized by CDC during the implementation phase. Based on the census data, information on affected trees and plant with estimated compensation cost for the loss of trees has been summarized in Table 63 and the details of the cost estimation for private is given in the Annex 7.
Table 63. Compensation Cost Estimate for the Loss of Private Trees/ Plants Types of Mahadevsthan Arkhule Salle Total Total S.No Affected No Amount Trees No Amount No Amount No Amount Timber & 102,609.0 1 40 115 295,000.00 6 15,391.00 161 413,000.00 Fuel wood 0 2 Fodder 9 13,647.00 36 54,587.00 47 71,266.00 92 139,500.00
3 Fruits 15 42,868.41 3 8,573.68 1 2,857.89 19 54,299.98
4 Bamboo 158 7,900.00 300 15,000.00 25 1,250.00 483 24,150.00 Grand Total 755 630,949.98 Source: Field Survey, July 2012
16 Statistical Information of Nepalese Agriculture 2007/2008, a publication of Ministry of Agriculture, Nepal & Selected Indicators of Nepalese Agriculture and Population, A brochures of the Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, 2010 and consultation with relevant officers and the Ministry
76
c. Additional Assistance to the Vulnerable Groups 147. Based on the census data, there are about 33 vulnerable households of different categories. The Entitlement matrix (EM: B-5 (a,b,c) and B-6 (a,b,c) provisions cash compensation for such vulnerable households equivalent to three Months wage rate plus cash assistance @ NRs. 10,000 (per household) for restarting their livelihood. However, additional assistance to such vulnerable groups need to be distributed only after the finalization of resettlement impact and its extent, and confirmation of the vulnerability of the households in close collaboration with the local communities and CDC.
Table 64. Additional Assistance to Vulnerable Groups One Time One Time Financial Cash Assistance One time Total Assistance to Family to Vulnerable No of Special Additional S.N. at the Local get Enrolled Categories Households Assistance Assistance Agricultural in Skill (NRs.) [b] (NRs.) Wage Rate Development (NRs.) [a] Training (NRs.) [c] Women 1 Headed 20 540,000 200,000 160,000 900,000 Households Households 2 with Disable 6 162,000 60,000 48,000 270,000 Members Ethnic Occupational 3 21 567,000 210,000 168,000 945,000 Caste(Dalit) Groups Endangered 4 0 0 0 0 0 Groups Elderly 5 Headed 7 189,000 70,000 56,000 315,000 Households Below 6 70 1,890,000 700,000 560,000 3,150,000 Poverty line Total 3,348,000 1,240,000 992,000 5,580,000 Source: Field Survey, July 2012 Source: Census Survey, July 2012
[a] No. of HHs x 90 days x NRs. 300 [b] No. of HHs x NRs. 10, 000 [c] No. of HHs NRs. 8,000
3. Compensation for the Loss of Structures
a. Cost for Private Structures 148. There are ninety-one private structures going to be affecting in the Subproject road. As provisioned in the entitlement matrix (EM: C-1 (a.b) and C-2 (a,b,c), compensation cost for the affected structures have been calculated based on the measurement of the affected structures taken out during the field survey and construction type of affected structures. Furthermore the social survey team held consultation with local construction contractors, local community, and key stakeholders those who have constructed new houses within one year, to investigate the market
rate of the construction work like; private housing and other structures. Based on these investigations the technical team members provided technical ideas to estimate cost of affected structures. Guidelines of the Department of Urban Development and Housing (DUDH) have also been following while calculating the cost for affected structures.17 The structures were valued without deducting any depreciation in material use. The estimated cost for the private structure is presented in Table 65. Table 65. Estimated Compensation Cost for Structures
Area S.N. Structure Type Present Use Amount (Nrs.) (Square mt) Stone and mud 1 Residential/Trade 9,289,983.10 mortar 1337.58 Stone, mud with 2 plaster mortar Residential/Trade 132.50 250,00.00 (External) 3 Hut Residential/Trade 2383.78 35,629,329.67 Total 45,169,312.77 Source; Field Survey, July 2012
b. Displacement and Transportation Allowances 149. The displacement and transportation allowance covers the housing displacement and business displacement allowances. Households whose houses need to be relocated will receive a housing displacement allowance. Owners of commercial enterprises requiring relocation will receive a business displacement allowance. Estimated cost for the displacement and rehabilitation allowances is presented below Table 66. However, transportation allowance will not be estimated to the structure having partial loss.
Table 66. Displacement and Rehabilitation Allowances
S.N. Allowances Unit Quantity Amount (NRS)
1 House displacement allowance Number 86 8,60,000.00
2 Transportation allowance Number 106 10,60,000.00
3 Business displacement Number 20 4,00,000.00
Total Number 212 23,20,000.00
Source; Field Survey, July 2012
c. Allowances for the loss of Employment 150. These allowances cover the employees short term support cost, who loses the employment opportunities due to this Subproject. As per the findings of Census survey there are
17 The Government of Nepal, Department of Urban Development and Housing (DUDH) is the authorized Government body for the valuation of structures through the Government Gazette (Nepal Rajpatra, Section IV, number 50, Date 2045/12/6 (1988). The Department regularly updates its rate based on current market price and provides basis for calculating the cost of different types of structures.
78
three employees going to be lose their employment opportunities. Displaced employees wii be provided one time financial assistance equivalent to 90 days wage rate (Table 9.9).
d. Costs for the Loss of Cultural & Community Structures/Land/Facilities 151. Aiming to avoid project's impact in cultural places & community facilities, and market area, the technical design of the Subproject is flexible even on deviating the design standard by reducing lane width, and narrowing shoulders until and unless such activities do not undermined the road safety and environmental protection. As the detail census reveals, there is no any major loss of community structures in the subproject except some water tank, Khamai Statue, and some public resting places etc .However, replacement cost for the loss for such community structures/properties have been incorporated in engineering cost estimated.
4. Resettlement Plan Implementation and Management Cost 152. There are also several RP implementation activities that need to be carried out at Subproject level by the Project Manager (PM). Some of such activities are: (i) public consultation, and information dissemination, (ii) organizing CDC meetings, and implement CDC decision, field verification, and updating RP, (iii) organizing and mobilizing Subproject Level Committees (SLC), (iv) Deed Transfer and so on. In order to ensure such expenses, RP implementation cost also been calculated and incorporated in resettlement budget (Table 67).
Table 67. Cost Estimate for Resettlement Implementation Activities
Rate Estimated S.N. Description of Tasks Quantity (NRs.) Costs (NRs.) Information dissemination about the project, 1 1 150,000 150,000 resettlement impacts, and compensation provision
2 Organizing CDC meeting and follow up activities 6 15,000 90,000
3 Organizing GRC meetings and follow-up activities 10 10,000 100,000
Establishing Sub-local level committees and their 4 8 15,000 120,000 mobilization (@NRs.15,000 per committee) Public notification of Affected assets and invitation to 5 4 150,000 600,000 receive compensation (@ NRs. 150,000) Surveyor/Amin Mobilization for Field Verification and 6 6 60,000 360,000 Deed Transfer (NRs. 60,000 Per Man month)
7 Sub-total (1-5) - - 1,060,000
8 Contingency 10% - 106,000
Overall 1,166,000
Source: Census Survey, July 2012
5. Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Costs 153. The summary of resettlement implementation cost includes all the expenses required to compensate for the affected assets including rehabilitation/relocation costs and other financial assistance (Table 68). The summary cost also contains additional ten percent contingency amounts, and costs required for external monitoring and capacity building training. Descriptive text on capacity building and external monitoring is included in Chapters 10 & 12 of this RP document.
Table 68. Summary of Resettlement Budget and Cost Estimate
S.No Cost Item Unit Quantity Amount (NRs.) Remarks Estimated compensation for Square 1 194,402.00 182,346,180.00 Table 9.2 private land Meter Estimated compensation for 2 Number 755 574,875.00 Table 9.4 private trees Estimated compensation for 3 Number 106 45,169,312.77 Table 9.6 private structures Compensation for the loss of Square 4 147000 492,353.68 Table 9.3 standing crops Meter Displacement & 5 - - 2,320,000.00 Table 9.7 transportation allowance Additional assistance to 6 - - 5,580,000.00 Table 9.5 vulnerable groups 7 RP implementation Cost - - 1,166,000.00 Table 9.8 External monitoring and 8 - - 1,815,000.00 Annex-10 evaluation 9 Skill development training - - 300,000.00 LS 10 Loss of Employment Number 3 45,000.00 Total RP Cost (NRS.) - - 239,808,721.45 US [email protected](July 20,2012) - - 2,718,919.74
80
X. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT
A. The Setup 154. The Land Acquisition Act 1977 will guide the institutional arrangement for RP implementation. The primary institutions will established at two levels: (i) central level, and (ii) district level. The Executing Agency (EA) and the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) will be stationed at central level, and there will be a Subproject level office at project location. Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) assigned for the task of supervising the construction activities and RP implementation will support the Subproject office. Figure 5 provides the proposed institutional set-up for RP implementation activities.
B. The Executing Agency 155. Ministry of Physical Planning, Works & Transport Management (MoPPWTM) will be the Executing Agency (EA), and Department of Roads (DOR) will be the implementing agency (IA). A Project Implementation Unit (PIU) will be established at Project Directorate (ADB) under the DoR to take the responsibility of overall implementation of the Subprojects activities under the SRCP. The amount of compensation at replacement cost is a consolidated amount. The Ministry of Physical Planning, Works and Transport Management ( MoPPWTM) is only one government agency, which is responsible to pay all kinds of resettlement cost.
C. The Project Implementation Unit 156. The PIU will be headed by Project Director (PD) of the DoR, Project Directorate Office (ADB). The PD will be supported by the Deputy Project Directors and other in-house staffs. The PD will also be responsible for implementing resettlement plan for all the Subprojects under the SRCP. The Consultant Social / Resettlement Specialist (SRS) of the Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) will support the PD on overall mechanism and process of resettlement implementation. 157. The SRS will support the PD on processing and implementing RP activities. He/she will maintain all the process documents and database related to RP implementation at field level and supplied to PIU. This includes; formats/inventories of affected assets and Displaced Persons (DPs), compensation payment status, record of grievances and resolved status and progress reports. The field level activities carried out by the consultant SRS will be regularly monitored by the PIU. The Geo-environment and Social Unit (GESU) under the DoR will also monitor the RP implementation activities under its regular monitoring program.
D. The Subproject Office 158. A field level Subproject office will be established under the PIU, headed by Project Managers (PM) with officers in the rank of Senior Divisional Engineer (SDE). The PM on behalf of the Executing and Implementing Agencies will; (i) Formally request, and support the Chief District Officer (CDO) to form a CDC for fixing compensation rates to the acquired assets, (ii) Coordinate and support the CDO on establishing a Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) to minimize the pressure of local grievances, and (iii) Establish Subproject Level Committees (SLCs) to facilitate the DPs on addressing minor grievances, (iv) Support the CSC and SRO on RP implementation activities, and carrying out other activities that might be required for RP implementation.
E. Construction Supervision Consultant 159. The Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) to be recruited and appointed by the PIU also be made responsible for supporting RP implementation. The CSC through the consultant SRS will support the Subproject office and PIU on overall RP implementation activities.
1. Roles and Responsibilities 160. The consultant SRS will assist the Subproject Office on informing people about the likely resettlement impacts, provisions of compensation to the displaced persons for their affected assets and other resettlement assistance, and to solicit views of those affected by the Subproject regarding compensation and likely grievances. He/she will also assist the CDC on negotiating the compensation rate. He/she will regularly execute the RP implementation activities with the support of CDC, Subproject Level Committees (SLC), and other stakeholders and may seek support from the Project Manager (PM). The consultant SRS will be responsible in resolution of grievances at local level and assisting the GRC, PM and other stakeholder. Among others, the consultant SRS also will be responsible to: . Inform DPs and other affected persons about the entitlements and compensation provisions made in the RP, and payment methods; . Assist CDC on negotiating and determining the compensation rate for various affected assets; . Assist PM in the resolution of grievances at local level; . Identify vulnerable group and severely affected persons and recommend additional support and livelihood assistance and skill development training to them; . Keep and update all resettlement activities/data/reporting and submit progress report to PIU, DoR on monthly basis.
82
Figure 5: Institutional Setup to Implement the Resettlement Activities
GoN Ministry of Physical Planning, Works and Transport Management
Department of Roads External ADB Implementing Agency Monitoring
Project Directorate Supervision (ADB) Consultant (SC) PIU SRCP Project Director Social/Resettlement Deputy Project Director Specialist (SRS)
Compensataion Subproject Office (SPO) Determination Committee Project Manager CDO (Divisional Engineer) CDLRO PM Representative of DDC Represenative of DPs
Subproject Level Committee (as needed) to be represented by: Grievance Redress Committee (District) Consultant DPs Social Mobilizer Local representatives of political parties CDO Vulnerable groups DOR representative District level agencies and VDC representative other stakeholders as required
Displaced Persons (DPs)
84
2. Institutional Capacity and Staff Training
a. Institutional Capacity 161. As per the DoR existing organizational structure, there is Geo-Environment and Social Unit (GESU) under the Department of Roads (DoR) at the central level, which is responsible for overall monitoring of social, resettlement and environmental aspects in road projects. At present, the unit comprises of one Senior Divisional Engineer, two Engineers and one Sociologist. Some of the main activities being carried out by the GESU include; . Preparing environmental and social guidelines/manuals; . Conducting training on environmental and social components; . Conducting and monitoring environmental, social and resettlement activities in different ongoing projects. 162. As far as the Resettlement is concerned, still there is lack of institutional mechanisms for resettlement planning, implementation, monitoring & evaluation. Currently, based on the system laid down in the Land Acquisition Act 1977, and experience gained from some of the implemented and ongoing projects, DoR has been carrying out resettlement activities in some projects supported by the consultants. However, DoR strength on resettlement planning, implementation, monitoring & evaluation still to be strengthened particularly in line with the prevailing Acts and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009.
b. Staff Training 163. As an approach to enhance DoR capacity on RP activities, a short-term (two days) training/workshop program has been proposed under the RP implementation program. The GESU, supported by a consultant will conduct capacity development program/workshop to the DoR staff and representatives of other stakeholders involved in RP implementation both at central and district level. The program will be organized right before mobilization to the field. Some of the key participants to be involved in the training/workshop at central level include Project Manager (PM) and engineer assigned for the Subproject, Social/Resettlement Specialist mobilized under Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC), staff involved from the contractors, and other relevant stakeholder involved in the Subproject. Similarly, some of the key persons to be involved from the Subproject level includes; members of GRC and SLC, representatives from the district level agencies (DDC, DLSO, DLRO, DFO, DAO and others), representatives of DPs, and local communities. Among other, the training/workshop will also cover the following topics: . Understanding about the Land Acquisition Act 1977, and ADB Policy Guidelines and differences between national and ADB policies, between country policy and laws; . Understanding of the RP policy, principles and procedures of land acquisition in the Subproject; . Understanding on the entitlements and compensation & assistance provisioned in the RP, and disbursement mechanisms; . Understanding about the RP implementation schedule and activities of the Subproject; . Understanding about the need of public consultation and participation to implement the RP, and grievance resolution; . Understanding of the monitoring and reporting requirements; . Understanding of the economic rehabilitation of the DPs; . Understanding about the likely issues and measures to address them
The cost estimate to implement to capacity development program/workshop is included in Annex 9 under the monitoring and evaluation chapter.
3. Resettlement Databank 164. All the information related to land acquisition, resettlement and relocation/rehabilitation activities, socioeconomic information of the DPs, inventories of Displaced Persons (DPs) and their affected assets, compensation distribution status, information on resolved and new grievances, and other associated information will be maintained and updated at Subproject level and supplied to the PIU at central level.
86
XI. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITIES
A. Implementation Schedule 165. As per the draft detail design report (submitted on June 2012), the Subproject has been planned to implement from the beginning of 2013. The procurement of civil works contractor and Construction Supervision Contractor (CSC) will be carried out in 2012. The RP implementation activities expected to start from the last quarter of 2012 and to conclude in the last quarter of 2012. The RP implementation activities mainly consist the tasks of compensation distribution and associated rehabilitation and resettlement activities. Table 69 provides tentative RP implementation schedule of the Subproject. The timeframe is based on the overall project implementation schedule included in draft detail technical report and will be updated in accordance to the changes likely to be made in the project implementation plan.
B. Key RP Implementation Activities
1. Advance Actions 166. Upon the loan processing, DoR will initiate advance action such as; (i) establishment of Subproject office, (ii) recruitment of Project Manager (PM) and information dissemination to DPs and local community, (iii) formation of CDC, (iv) establishment of GRC, (v) selection of Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC), and establishment of Subproject Level Committees (SLC) as required. Some of key RP implementation process is described in the subsections below:
2. Mobilization of Construction Supervision Consultant 167. Project Implementation Unit (PIU) will mobilize Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) to monitor the project construction activities and to implement the resettlement plan. The Social/Resettlement Consultant (SRS) to be mobilized by CSC will be responsible for implementing the resettlement activities in close coordination with the PIU, PM, CDC, including local communities and Displaced Persons (DPs). Some of the key tasks to be rendered for RP implementation are briefly discussed below:
3. Cadastral Survey and Updating Draft RP 168. Cadastral survey is the method of determining resettlement impact on land, structures, and other assets aligning with the reference of cadastral maps. It has to be carried out by land surveyor with the help of assistant surveyor and other resettlement team (e.g. enumerators, social mobilizers, and resettlement specialist). It is the main part of RP implementation activities and to officially delineate the scope and extent of land acquisition.
Table 69. Resettlement Implementation Schedule S.N Activities 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q4 Q1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 1 Formation of PIU, institutional arrangement and establishment of Sub-project Office 2 Public Consultation and Information Dissemination to DPs 3 Hiring and mobilization of Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) also for construction and RP 4 Selectionimplementation and Mobilization of Contractors for Construction Works 5 Hiring and mobilization of Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC)for construction supervision and RP implementation 5.1 Cadestral Survey,RP updating and Submission to CDO to fix Compensation Rate 5.2 Formation of CDC and Notification DPs 5.3 Complain and Grievances by DPs and Decision on Grievances 5.4 Compensation Distribution and Ownership Transfer 5.5 Transfer of ownership and Land Acquisition 5.6 Skill Training 5.7 External Monitoring [a]
Notes: 1 The RP implementation schedule is tentative and may be changed in accordance to the project implementation schedule 2 [a] To be carried out right before the contractor mobilization to post implementation phase
88
C. Finalization of Resettlement Cost 169. After the finalization of RP, the DoR will formally submit the updated RP to the CDO. The CDO in accordance to the Land Acquisition Act will form a Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) for the valuation of affected assets and fixation of compensation rate in accordance to Clause 13 of the Land Acquisition Act 1977. As provisioned in the Act, the members to be included in the CDC are: . Chief District Officer; . Chief of the District Land Administration Office or Land Revenue Office; . Chief of the Project office; . Representative of the respective District Development Committee (DDC), and other members assigned by Chief District Officer (CDO). 170. There is also practice of involving representative from DPs and local communities in CDC as observer. 171. While determining the compensation rate, the Act also ensures separate compensation rate for those having complete loss of land, and those having partial affect (Clause 13-3). Further, according to Clause 14 of the Act, there is also provision of land for land compensation (if Government land is available in the project area/VDC). In addition, to the provisions specified in different clauses, the Act through its Clause 16, ensures also to consider followings while determining the compensation rate: . Government guidelines, and policies published in different time; . Likely losses to the affected people; . Current market value of acquired land; . Value of affected structures, crops, land etc, and . Extent of losses caused due to relocation/shifting of Displaced people, while fixing the compensation rate. 172. The CDC members will review the RP and may seek support from other sectoral agencies in this process. Similarly, the Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) carried out during the feasibility, details design phase, and cadastral survey may be verified, and crosschecked with the DPs and other stakeholders as deemed necessary. Afterwards, CDO based upon the comments/suggestion made by CDC (after reviewing the RP), will determine the compensation rate. Depending upon the nature of comments made by CDC, the CDO may also ask to review and update the compensation cost before finalization.
D. Compensation Distribution and Deed Transfer 173. A consensus between the CDO and PM will be made abut the compensation distribution modality deciding whether compensation to be distributed by CDO office or by the Subproject office. In practice, generally the CDO use to nominate Project Manager as Compensation Distribution Officer, and authorizes the project itself for compensation distribution. However, the compensation distribution activities will be closely supervised and supported by the CDO. 174. The DPs, through the national and local newspapers and other media, will be notified about the venue, schedule and timing of compensation distribution. The notification will also content message about the (i) documents to be brought while applying for compensation (e.g. citizenship paper, ownership certificate, recommendation from VDC/Municipality office, need of spouses presence on the day of compensation etc), and (ii) available support and assistance from the subproject. In between, the Compensation Distribution Officer, will prepare necessary formats required for compensation distribution and maintaining records. Such formats also include; format of request letter for compensation, format to request to get clearance of the affected land to be submitted to District Land Revenue Office, and District Land Survey Office, instructions about the
processes to be followed to process the application for compensation). Such formats need to be made available to the DPs at free of cost. 175. Compensation will be paid as per the prevailing Acts, prior to the actual possession of the acquired land and other assets. The project will provide adequate advance notification to the DPs and will pay their due resettlement benefits, including relocation and income restoration/assistance prior to start of construction work. However, considering the practical issues, CDC may also arrange to provide 50% compensation in advance to demolish the affected structures and remaining 50% only after demolishment. 176. Compensation will be distributed on each office day within working hours. The amount will be paid on cash or cheque depending upon the size of amount, availability of banking service in the area, and CDC decisions. The signed document will be kept properly and the copies of entitlement documents signed by DPs will be forwarded to District Land Survey Office and District Land Revenue Office for deed transfer. All the records of compensation distribution will be maintained in the formats as provisioned in prevailing financial Acts and Rules.
E. Management of Unclaimed Compensation 177. As per the Land Acquisition Act 1977, all the unpaid compensation due to several reasons (e.g. lack of supporting official documents, absentee DPs, unsolved grievances, and court cases, etc) will be deposited in Government's fixed account for security and DPs will be paid their compensation upon submission of formal application with supporting documents.
F. Time Duration for Compensation Distribution 178. As stipulated in Clause 9 Sub-clause 3 of the Land Acquisition Act 1977, the duration of compensation distribution days will be determined by CDC. Further, Clause 37 of the Act illustrates that the Committee may extend the period for additional three months, if DPs could not collect compensation due to several reasons (e.g. lack of budget, unsolved grievances, absentee, court cases etc). After termination of extended three months’ period, the amount will be deposited to Government's fixed account and will be paid to DPs from the office of CDO.
90
XII. MONITORING AND REPORTING
A. Monitoring and Reporting Need 179. DoR will hold overall responsibility for the implementation of compensation and resettlement measures, and for associated monitoring and reporting activities. It will be coordinated by the Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) involves concerned stakeholders and project affected communities and as well as external agencies. 180. Monitoring and Reporting (M&R) is the tools for ensuring effective RP implementation. The RP implementation activities need to be monitored in different stages of project cycle. The frequency and nature of monitoring and reporting may varies in different phases. 181. Resettlement Plan (RP) implementation is a set of long-term activities that need to be carried out based on technical norms, legal process, and administrative steps with the involvement of different stakeholders including local community and DPs. Appropriate combination and coherence is essential between these elements for the successful implementation of RP. Monitoring and Reporting (M&R) plays a crucial role on stimulating different facets related to RP implementation as well as to provide appropriate back-up support. Monitoring and reporting through its periodic assessment and reporting with planned activities facilitates on obtaining necessary feedbacks for effective and timely implementation of RP. 182. The overall aim of the monitoring programme will be to measure the extent to which the goals of the RP have been achieved. This will be achieved through two broad components: • performance monitoring; • impact monitoring; and 183. Indicators (the variables used to measure progress toward the goals of the RP) and targets (the quantified levels of the indicators to be achieved at a given point in time) will be established in consultation with affected communities and other key stakeholders. The following range of indicators will be established: • input indicators (to measure the financial, physical and human resources allocated for the attainment of resettlement and livelihood restoration goals); • output indicators (to measure the services/goods and activities produced by the inputs; e.g., compensation disbursements for acquired assets, and the construction of replacement services/facilities); • outcome indicators (to measure the extent to which the outputs are accessible and used, and the levels of satisfaction with services and activities produced by the inputs. e.g. the ways in which compensation was used by recipients, and changing local attitudes to project implementation); • impact indicators (to measure the key dimensions of livelihood restoration so as to determine whether the goals of the RP have been achieved; e.g., restoration and diversification of income levels across different social categories, the sustainability of income-generating activities and changes in literacy levels); and • process indicators (to measure and assess implementation processes; e.g., the functioning of liaison/participation structures, the levels of representation of different social categories and the processes by which conflicts and disputes are resolved)
B. Monitoring in the Subproject 1. 184. The RP implementation activities implemented by Construction and Supervision Consultant (CSC) will be monitored on a regular basis both through (i) Internal Monitoring, and (ii) External Monitoring. The internal and external monitoring report will be submiited to ADB semi- anually.
1. Internal Monitoring 185. Project Implementation Unit (PIU) with the support of Subproject Office (SPO) and Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC) will oversee and monitor the field level activities. The CSC will maintain records of all transactions in their Management Information System (MIS), followed by entitlement records, payment records signed by DPs and survey based monitoring of RP implementation progress on a monthly basis. Based on the record maintained by CSC office, the PM in the Subproject Office (SPO) will regularly monitor the RP implementation progress and report to PIU on quarterly basis. Among others, the internal monitoring will ensure: . Verification that there are no outstanding or unresolved land acquisition issues with respect to the project and that property valuation and economic rehabilitation has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of the plan; . Ensure the completion of information campaign and consultation with DPs; . Progress on compensation payment; . Value of entitlement received is equal to that of original approved cost; . Payment for all types of impact and losses; . Use of entitlement and check its misuse; . Status of relocation, if applicable; . Ensure all economic rehabilitation measures are implemented, as approved; . Effective operation of the Grievance Redress Committees both a Subproject and community level; . Funds for implementing land acquisition and economic rehabilitation activities are available in a timely manner, sufficient for the purposes, and are spent in accordance with the plan. 186. The SPO will also be responsible for monitoring the day-to-day resettlement activities carried out by the CSC and field monitoring. Baseline socioeconomic and census data provides necessary benchmark for field level monitoring. The field level monitoring will be carried out through: . Review of census information of DPs; . Consultation and informal interviews with DPs; . In-depth case studies; . Informal sample survey of DPs; . Key informant interview; and . Community public meetings 187. The central level GESU under the DoR will also carry out internal monitoring. Among others, the GESU monitoring will also be focused on process monitoring. This will be supportive to GESU to be familiar about the RP implementation possesses and on establishing a RP implementation and monitoring parameter within the department. Some of the key indicators applicable for process monitoring are given in Table 70.
92
Table 70. Key Indicators for Process Monitoring
Key Indicators On Information dissemination Methods adopted to inform local people and DPs about the likely resettlement impacts, and mitigation measures to be adopted by the project Types of information shared with DPs and local people Effectiveness of the information dissemination activities on informing DPs and local people about the project, likely resettlement impacts, and mitigation measures On updating resettlement impacts and RP Whether the RP team visited each DP's house while updating resettlement impacts Whether the RP team consulted significantly affected and vulnerable households? Activities carried out by the resettlement team while updating resettlement impacts Use of updated data on finalizing RP Database management and updating process Formats and inventories used for recording affected assets and DPs Methods adopted to verify information on affected assets, DPs and human resource involved Management system of official records, correspondence, meeting minutes, account keeping, bank statements etc On local level grievances Mechanism to address grievances and its effectiveness Composition of Subproject Level Committees (SLC) and operation stations Effectiveness of SLCs on addressing local level grievance and its strength and issues On compensation distribution and deed transfer Process adopted and format used to distribute compensation Compensation payment record (signed by DPs) along with entitlement/official documents submitted by them and associated issues Coordination with and support from sectoral agencies (District Land Measurement Office, District Land Revenue Office, Banks etc) Evidence of spouse and joint owners' presence (as applicable) while paying compensation Supports being provided to DPs in terms of updating ownership records, updating ownership records for sectoral agencies in the process of compensation payment; Rehabilitation of DPs Deed transfer status of compensated assets and associated issues/constraints Other information as deemed necessary
2. External Monitoring 188. External monitoring is required to supervise the overall monitoring activities carried out under the internal monitoring and to submit a biannual report to determine whether the resettlement goal have been achieved. The PIU will engage external monitoring agency within three months of loan approval. The external monitoring agency will monitor RP implementation intermittently. The key focuses of external monitoring will be: (i) initial verification of compensation distribution and (ii) bi-annual review of resettlement implementation. 189. External monitoring will be carried out through outside researcher or consulting agency or NGOs, or through independent consultants. The key activities that need to be considered in external monitoring have been summarized in Box 3. Some of the potential sources of external monitoring could be; consulting agency, university departments, independent consultants. The key objective of external monitoring includes; . Assess social and economic impact of land acquisition and economic rehabilitation of the DPs; . Verify the objective of enhancement or at least restoration of income levels and living standard of the DPs have been met; . Suggest modifications on RP implementation and economic rehabilitation, where necessary, to achieve the principles and objectives as set before; and . Make final ex-post evaluation to ensure all RP implementation activities have been completed; and all the records (including financial) are maintained
Box 3: Key External Monitoring Activities Verification of internal monitoring Review and verify the internal monitoring reports prepared by PIU Review the Socioeconomic baseline census information and assess the social and economic impacts of resettlement and economic rehabilitation of the DPs; Identification and selection of impacts indicators; Consultation with DPs, officials, and local community for review the overall performance; Verifying the objective of enhancement or at least restoration of income levels and standard of living of the DPs have been met; Ensure the appropriateness of activities being carried out; Declaration of RP implementation progress Summing up the outcome of all entitlements distribution and resettlement activities in different stages as required; Suggesting modification in resettlement and economic rehabilitation, where necessary in order to achieve the principles and objectives set forth in advance Evaluation of actual operations of grievance committee Levels of public awareness of grievance procedures; Assess the need for appropriate and effective grievance redress process based on local context Describe Lessons Learnt Different lesson learnt that need to be considered while implementing RP in the future 190. The external monitoring report will be determined whether or not resettlement goals have been achieved, whether livelihoods and living standards have been restored/enhanced, and suggestion and recommendations for improvement. The external monitoring agency will also carry
94 out a final ex-post evaluation to ensure that all RP implementation activities have been completed. Any problems or issues identified are followed-up (including recommendation of mitigation measures and supplementary budget if required); and learning from such issues must be recorded which would help to deal with issues such as these more effectively. The external experts will advise on safeguard compliance issues and if any significant involuntary resettlement issues are identified, a corrective action plan will be prepared to address such issues. The external monitors will prepare semiannual monitoring reports which will be submitted to the EA and the EA in turn will submit these to ADB. A sample Terms of Reference (ToR) for the external monitoring agency with cost estimate have been included in Annex 9.
C. Reporting Requirements 191. The CSC will prepare a monthly progress reports on resettlement activities and submit to the PIU, and Subproject office, on the basis of CSC monthly report and field level monitoring will prepared quarterly reports and submit to PIU and ADB. The external monitoring agency will submit semiannual reports to EA and EA in turn will submit these reports to ADB. Sufficient copies will be provided to PIU and GESU. A copy of monitoring report prepared by the external monitoring agency will also submitted to GESU. This will be helpful for GESU on determining the area to be focused on its regular monitoring program.
D. ToR for External Monitoring and Budget 192. The ToR for external monitoring with estimated budget is attached in Annex - 8 within this report. Transport Project Preparatory Facility (TPPF) ADB Grant: 0227–NEP Resettlement PlanReport
ANNEXES
96
Annex-1: Inventory of Affected Private Land with Percentage of Loss
97
Annex 1: List of Affected Private Land-HD Road
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
1 Tek Bahadur Giri Ram Krishna Surathi Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 33 R/L 40+351 1765 330 132 198 1435 11.2
2 112 Bhupdhoj Basnet Nar Bahadur Dewansi Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 35 R/L 40+450 7070 750 300 450 6320 6.4 Homestead Sim
3 Naran Singh Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 866 R 40+530 127 90 36 54 37 42.5
4 Dhamala Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 867 R/L 40+535 127 90 36 54 37 42.5
5 Bhajman Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 865 R/L 40+537 127 90 36 54 37 42.5
6 Yuvraj Giri Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 871 R/L 40+539 158 120 60 60 38 38
Bhagat Sher Krisna Bdr. 7 119 Trip Dhoj Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 870 R/l 40+540 128 120 60 60 8 46.9 Sim rai Rai 8 Kul Bahadur Giri Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 833 L 40+545 255 120 30 90 135 35.3
9 Moti Lal Giri Chatra Bdr Birkha Bdr Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 834 L 40+550 128 40 20 120 88 93.8 Homestead Chahar
10 99 Rupnarayan Dahal Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 481 l 40+580 450 190 75 115 260 25.6
Harish 11 Babita Giri Bam Prasad Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 41 R 4640 795 395 400 3845 8.6 Chandra 12 Rebati Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 515 R/L 40+900 700 446 60 386 254 55.1
13 Tirtha Raj Basnet Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 760 95 35 5 30 60 31.6
14 Bishnu Katual Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 769 85.5 40 8 32 45.5 37.4
Shiv Bakas 15 Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 768 30 10 2 8 20 26.7 Katuwal Shiv Bakas 16 Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 841 37 15 15 22 40.5 Katuwal Shiv Bakas 17 Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 842 2 2 0 2 0 100 Katuwal Chitra Kumari 18 Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 843 36 30 6 24 6 66.7 Bhujal 19 Manu Devi Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 805 63 30 10 20 33 31.7
20 Renuka Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 806 63 20 8 12 43 19
21 Hima Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 807 63 15 0 15 48 23.8
Man Bahadur 912/91 22 Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 160 64 32 32 96 20 Ghimery 3
98
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Chandra Bdr. 23 114 Dinesh giri Ambar Giri Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 910 R/L 40+930 2130 225 90 135 1905 6.3 Homestead Sim Giri 24 Champa Sari Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 682 127.5 64 10 54 63.5 42.4
25 Kumar Singh Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 683 127.5 0 0 127.5 0
Habindra 26 Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 749 307 0 0 307 0 Rai/Yamala Rai Habindra 27 Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 748 127 254 142 112 -127 88.2 Rai/Yamala Rai 28 Deu Bahadur Rai Mahadevsthan 4 165-1331 564 L 40+950 318 159 50 109 159 34.3
Chandra Bdr. 29 114 Dinesh giri Ambar Giri Mahadevsthan 4 165-1291 911 L 41+025 10913 1602 627 975 9311 8.9 Homestead Sim Giri Durga Bahadur 30 Mahadevsthan 4 165-1291 921 3054 0 0 3054 0 KC 31 Post Raj KC Mahadevsthan 4 165-1291 920 3056 825 330 495 2231 16.2
Bhakta 32 Post Raj KC Bans Raj Mahadevsthan 4 165-1291 338 R/L 41+600 8510 2812 1125 1687 5698 19.8 Bahadur Dal Bahadur Ganesh Bhakta 33 Mahadevsthan 4 165-1291 335 L 41+700 4860 413 102 311 4447 6.4 Katuwal Bahadur Bahadur 34 Garvabati Rai Mahadevsthan 2 165-1291 530 R 41+850 2670 127 34 93 2543 3.5
35 104 Dhok Bahadur Rai Jasjit Rai Baljit Mahadevsthan 2 165-1291 405 R/L 41+950 4935 945 372 573 3990 11.6
Nripu Bahadur 36 Godame Udiman Mahadevsthan 2 165-1291 406 R/L 42+010 1555 495 198 297 1060 19.1 Biswakarma Dikpal 37 88 Udiman Ranaman Mahadevsthan 2 165-1291 414 R 42+025 300 254 51 203 46 67.7 Biswakarma Tek Bahaddur 38 89 Udiman Ranaman Mahadevsthan 2 165-1291 413 R/L 42+050 645 581 334 247 64 38.3 Biswakarma Nripu Bahadur 39 109 Godame Udiman Mahadevsthan 2 165-1291 412 R/L 42+050 635 127 27 100 508 15.7 Homestead Sim Biswakarma Nripu Bahadur 40 109 Godame Udiman Mahadevsthan 2 165-1291 415 R 42+060 575 80 25 55 495 9.6 Homestead Sim Biswakarma Chandra Kala 41 93 Kale Udiman Mahadevsthan 2 165-1291 11 R/L 42+100 5830 930 375 555 4900 9.5 Upland Kamini Dhok 42 104 Ben Sher Rai Jasjit Mahadevsthan 2 165-1291 14 1560 900 360 540 660 34.6 Homestead Sim Bahadur
43 30 Lalit Bahadur Rai Bajir Dhoj Sing Man Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 13 R/l 42+250 2575 960 384 576 1615 22.4 Upland Chahar
44 30 Lalit Bahadur Rai Bajir Dhoj Sing Man Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 69 R/L 42+400 5220 2250 900 1350 2970 25.9 Upland Chahar
Ganesh Kumar 45 Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 504 L 42+550 1130 127 62 65 1003 5.8 Rai 46 Kumbha Raj Rai Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 503 L 42+555 3565 95 40 55 3470 1.5
99
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
47 Bhair Laxmi Rai Gang Raj Lalit Bahadur Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 76 L 42+560 1420 30 0 30 1390 2.1
48 Yegu Maya Raini Jas Bahadur Chandra Sher Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 72 L 42+570 415 127 0 127 288 30.6
49 108 Fing Maya Rai Chankha Raj Prithiman Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 501 L 42+570 2195 31 0 31 2164 1.4 Upland Chahar
50 103 Bal Bdr. Rai Harka Bhakta Jay Bdr. Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 506 R 42+580 4335 159 60 99 4176 2.3 Upland Chahar
51 Kuber Man Rai Kumbha Raj AsBhakta Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 65 R/L 42+585 85 85 15 70 0 82.4
52 116 Amraj Rai Tej Bahadur Dhan Sher Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 66 R/L 42+590 405 405 105 300 0 74.1 Homestead Sim
Jagadamba 53 Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 67 L 42+600 290 194 77 117 96 40.3 Primary School Bhuvani Shanker 54 BadanSher Madhubar Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 64 R 42+600 375 78 0 78 297 20.8 Rai 55 Kuber Man Rai Kumbha Raj AsBhakta Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 62 R 42+625 1380 31 0 31 1349 2.2
Bhuvani Shanker 56 BadanSher Madhubar Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 276 R 42+625 8835 10 0 10 8825 0.1 Rai Krishna 57 117 Lal Bahadur Rai Mag Sher Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 275 R 42+650 1025 31 0 31 994 3 Homestead Chahar Bahadur Krishna 58 111 Ram Prasad Rai Mag Sher Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 282 R 42+725 395 10 0 10 385 2.5 Upland Sim Bahadur
59 105 Kampa Sher Rai Jit Bahadur Prithvi Man Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 284 R 42+760 740 63 7 56 677 7.6 Homestead Sim
Charambha Raj 60 Jit Bahadur Prithvi Man Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 285 R 42+780 1015 127 49 78 888 7.7 Rai Bhuvani Shanker 61 BadanSher Madhubar Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 286 R 42+800 170 95 30 65 75 38.2 Rai
62 Toya Laxmi Rai Damber Sin DhanSher Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 291 R 42+815 430 90 26 64 340 14.9 Homestead
63 107 Akal Man Rai Maha Sher Krishna bar Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 288 R/L 42+850 1615 885 354 531 730 32.9 Homestead Sim
Bhuvani Shanker 64 BadanSher Madhubar Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 273 L 42+875 1000 10 0 10 990 1 Rai 65 ShivRani Rai Gyan Singh Kripasur Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 372 R/L 42+875 1475 225 90 135 1250 9.2
66 Asal Maya Rai Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 560 R 42+960 732 286 95 191 446 26.1
67 255 Tank Bahadur Rai Jahan Singh Sakhar Lal Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 258 R/L 43+000 2050 1050 420 630 1000 30.7 Homestead Sim
Janam Raj 68 Sampura Rai Ram Bahadur Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 256 L 42+950 1105 331 113 218 774 19.7 Rai 69 PhulSari Rai Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 561 R 43+000 513 31 0 31 482 6
70 106 Dhan Kumari Rai Panth Raj Ram Bahadur Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 267 R/L 43+050 3685 705 282 423 2980 11.5 Homestead Sim
100
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Ram 71 106 Panth Raj Rai Jit Lal Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 265 L 43+100 295 31 0 31 264 10.5 Homestead Sim Bahadur Janam Raj 72 Sampura Rai Ram Bahadur Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 268 R 43+125 1095 31 0 31 1064 2.8 Rai 73 Dhansari Rai Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 269 L 43+125 365 250 100 150 115 41.1
Chandraman, 74 Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 307 R/L 43+190 3345 240 96 144 3105 4.3 Kuberman……5 75 Garvabati Rai Kumbha Raj Aasmaha Mahadevsthan 2 165-1292 308 R/L 43+210 610 279 111 168 331 27.5
76 Pura Laxmi Rai Kripasur Magjit Mahadevsthan 2 165-1332 309 R/L 43+225 735 195 78 117 540 15.9
77 120 Ghanshyam Rai Charu Man Chatur Bhakta Mahadevsthan 2 165-1332 310 R/L 43+240 1965 95 28 67 1870 3.4 Homestead Sim
78 Setu Man Bhujel DhanBir Mai Singh Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 262 R/L 43+825 74210 1920 768 1152 72290 1.6
79 Kale Kami Harke Kami Udaya Kami Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 361 R/L 43+900 585 349 139 210 236 35.9
80 118 Hamal Sher Rai Tapi Dhoj Dhuk Man Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 363 R 44+025 1660 224 56 168 1436 10.1
81 118 Hamal Sher Rai Tapi Dhoj Dhuk Man Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 356 L 44+025 4510 660 300 360 3850 8
Dhyani Chandra 82 Thir Bahadur Harka Sher Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 382 R 44+100 7550 508 210 298 7042 3.9 Rai 83 SabJit Rai Agam Sher Jang Dhoj Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 364 L 44+100 3970 660 264 396 3310 10
84 Pabitra Bhujelo Tek Man Sukha Bir Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 381 L 44+200 4070 1352 480 872 2718 21.4
Pathar Man Harka 85 Dik Bir Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 382 7550 222 50 172 7328 2.3 Rai/Sarki Dhan Bahadur 86 118 Hamal Sher Rai Tapi Dhoj Dhuk Man Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 391 R/L 44+250 4610 2617 1046 1571 1993 34.1
87 118 Hamal Sher Rai Tapi Dhoj Dhuk Man Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 393 R/L 44+300 2150 750 300 450 1400 20.9
88 Kumbha Raj Rai Ash Bharat Krishn abar Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 394 R/L 44+350 1640 550 220 330 1090 20.1
89 Puspa Raj Dahal Behari Lal Shyamu Lal Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 392 R/L 44+400 2210 785 314 471 1425 21.3
90 Puspa Raj Dahal Behari Lal Shyamu Lal Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 380 L 44+550 1250 254 160 94 996 7.5
Ram Prasad 91 Karna Khar Kamala Pati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 376 R/L 44+625 2240 935 348 587 1305 26.2 Dahal 92 Deep Laxmi Rai Meg Jit Dhan Jit Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 374 R/L 44+680 1525 510 204 306 1015 20.1
Tanka Hari Champa 93 Ganapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 371 R/L 44+750 4780 1540 600 940 3240 19.7 Timsina Khar 94 Puspa Raj Dahal Behari Lal Shyamu Lal Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 302 R/L 44+950 14410 869 647 222 13541 1.5
101
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Ram Prasad 95 Karnakhar Kamala Pati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 301 L 44+975 11425 31 0 31 11394 0.3 Dahal Ram Prasad 96 Karnakhar Kamala Pati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 175 R/L 45+000 305 305 66 239 0 78.4 Dahal 97 RamPrasad Dahal Karnakhar Kamala Pati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 178 L 45+020 2210 31 0 31 2179 1.4
Ram Prasad 98 Karnakhar Kamala Pati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 176 L 45+025 290 127 42 85 163 29.3 Dahal RupNarayan 99 Puspa Raj Behari Lal Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 146 R 45+075 3840 95 16 79 3745 2.1 Dahal Ratna Prasad 100 Balanand Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 173 R/L 45+100 1180 665 226 439 515 37.2 Dahal Chabi Kumar 101 Megani Jayganidhi Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 172 L 45+110 800 10 0 10 790 1.3 Dahal 102 Kale Kami Harke Kami Udaya Kami Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 170 L 45+150 4080 20 0 20 4060 0.5
103 Min Prasad Dahal Jagyanidhi Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 157 R 45+150 720 31 0 31 689 4.3
Chabi Kumar 104 Megani Jayganidhi Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 158 R 45+175 1110 508 240 268 602 24.1 Dahal Ratna Prasad 105 Balanand Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 159 R/L 45+200 2750 1227 520 707 1523 25.7 Dahal Chabi Kumar 106 Meghani Jayganidhi Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 130 R 45+275 1045 95 0 95 950 9.1 Dahal 107 Min Prasad Dahal Jayganidhi Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 129 L 45+275 1410 415 204 211 995 15
Ratna Prasad 108 Balanand Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 124 R/L 45+300 3270 840 336 504 2430 15.4 Dahal 109 Min Prasad Dahal Jayganidhi Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 110 R 45+300 2560 286 120 166 2274 6.5
Ratna Prasad 110 Balanand Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 123 R/L 45+395 160 157 80 77 3 48.1 Dahal 111 Posta nath Dahal Pasupati Loknath Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 122 L 45+395 1250 47 0 47 1203 3.8
112 Tika Devi Dahal Jayganidhi Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 111 R/L 45+410 665 270 108 162 395 24.4
Ratna Prasad 113 Balanand Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 112 R/L 45+450 1755 900 360 540 855 30.8 Dahal 114 Tika Devi Dahal Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 437 L 45+525 6545 159 72 87 6386 1.3
115 Min Prasad Dahal Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 436 R/L 45+550 1780 600 240 360 1180 20.2
Ratna Prasad 116 Balanand Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 101 R 45+575 645 79 31 48 566 7.4 Dahal Meghani Prasad 117 Jayganidhi Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 83 R/L 45+600 1440 690 276 414 750 28.8 Dahal
102
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Tankanath/Postan ath/RatnaPrasad/ 118 Chabi Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 435 10180 31 0 31 10149 0.3
Kumar/Ambu/Nare sh RamChandra 119 Dharmanand Kamala Pati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 87 R/L 45+875 30 30 14 16 0 53.3 Dahal/Tanka Nath 120 Parsu Ram Dahal Devi Charan Mitra Lal Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 86 R/L 45+875 80 65 24 41 15 51.3
121 Kashi Ram Dahal Jayganidhi Prajapati Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 85 R/L 45+875 60 60 14 46 0 76.7
122 Posta nath Dahal Pasupati Loknath Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 88 R/L 45+875 50 50 24 26 0 52
Tankanath/Postan 123 Mahadevsthan 1 165-1293 89 R 45+875 1750 31 0 31 1719 1.8 ath/Parsuram 124 Homnath Timsina Narnath Champakhar Mahadevsthan 1 165-1294 403 R/L 46+150 1610 450 180 270 1160 16.8
Tankanath/Postan 125 Mahadevsthan 1 165-1294 405 R/L 46+200 22240 2400 960 1440 19840 6.5 ath/Parsuram Chabi Kumar 126 Meghani Jayganidhi Mahadevsthan 1 165-1294 406 R/L 46+400 5150 1440 576 864 3710 16.8 Dahal Ganesh Prasad 127 Mahadevsthan 1 165-1294 504 R 46+450 3215 159 66 93 3056 2.9 Timsena Jagat Bahadur 128 Kale Harke Mahadevsthan 1 165-1294 413 R/L 46+470 7030 390 156 234 6640 3.3 Kami Utra sher 129 Mahadevsthan 1 165-1294 496 R/L 46+480 64 50 24 26 14 40.6 Aalemagar 130 103 Bal Bahadur Rai Mahadevsthan 1 165-1294 477 R/L 46+490 100 65 30 35 35 35
Khadga Bahadur 131 100 Mahadevsthan 1 165-1294 497 R/L 46+500 3426 635 246 389 2791 11.4 Magar 132 124 Lekhnath Subedi Naranath Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1294 227 R/L 47+075 3330 780 312 468 2550 14.1
Bhim Prasad 133 Naranath Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 226 R/L 47+150 5150 1110 444 666 4040 12.9 Subedi Tej Bahadur 134 23 Surya Prasad Devdutta Salle 8 165-1254 480 L 47+275 280 31 0 31 249 11.1 Upland Sim Subedi
135 80 Tika Ram Subedi Ganga Dhar Hridayanand Salle 8 165-1254 479 L 47+300 2480 296 66 230 2184 9.3 Homestead Sim
Bhim Prasad 136 Naranath Devdutta Salle 8 165-1254 478 L 47+375 230 120 20 100 110 43.5 Subedi
137 21 Tilmaya Subedi Nar Bahadur Surya Prasad Salle 8 165-1254 457 L 47+400 285 220 75 145 65 50.9 Homestead
Surya Prasad 138 Devdutta Hemu Lal Arkhaule 6 165-1254 223 R 47+475 2380 31 0 31 2349 1.3 Subedi Bhim Prasad 139 Naranath Devdutta Salle 8 165-1254 456 L 47+450 455 175 60 115 280 25.3 Subedi
103
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Bishnu Prasad 140 Kham Prasad Naranath Salle 8 165-1254 455 L 47+455 315 206 100 106 109 33.7 Subedi
141 124 Lekhnath Subedi Naranath Devdutta Salle 8 165-1254 454 L 47+475 355 159 90 69 196 19.4 Homestead Sim
Nar Bahadur 142 Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 157 R 47+480 385 63 13 50 322 13 Chettri Harka Bahadur 143 Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 156 R 47+490 395 63 13 50 332 12.7 Chettri Tej Bahadur 144 23 Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 155 R 47+500 415 20 0 20 395 4.8 Subedi 145 Bhimu Prasad Naranath Devdutta Salle 8 165-1254 453 L 47+490 110 31 0 31 79 28.2
146 80 TikaRam Subedi Ganga Dhar Hridayanand Arkhaule 8 165-1254 451 L 47+500 150 119 54 65 31 43.3 Upland Sim
147 21 Tilmaya Subedi Nar Bahadur Surya Prasad Arkhaule 8 165-1254 450 L 47+520 955 381 162 219 574 22.9 Homestead Sim
Bhim Prasad 148 Naranath Devdutta Arkhaule 8 165-1254 447 L 47+525 165 20 0 20 145 12.1 Subedi Netra Prasad 149 1 Homnath Jyotishwor Arkhaule 8 165-1254 448 L 47+530 205 143 56 87 62 42.4 Homestead Sim Subedi Tej Bahadur 150 23 Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 8 165-1254 449 L 47+550 955 79 40 39 876 4.1 Upland Sim Subedi
151 24 Laxman Subedi Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 8 165-1254 393 L 47+600 240 62 0 62 178 25.8 Upland Sim
152 124 Lekhnath Subedi Naranath Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 192 R 47+600 1290 477 240 237 813 18.4 Homestead Chahar
Nar Bahadur 153 Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 8 165-1254 392 L 47+625 240 60 0 60 180 25 Subedi 154 Guna Raj Subedi Naranath Ragunath Arkhaule 8 165-1254 391 L 47+650 220 28 0 28 192 12.7
Bishnu Prasad 155 Kham Prasad Naranath Arkhaule 6 165-1254 170 R 47+650 1200 763 396 367 437 30.6 Subedi Bhakta Bahadur 156 79 Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 159 R 47+775 305 140 70 70 165 23 Upland Sim Subedi Bhim Prasad 157 Naranath Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 162 R 47+715 145 145 60 85 0 58.6 Subedi 158 Lekh Nath Subedi Naranath Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 161 R 47+725 655 180 42 138 475 21.1
Bhim Prasad 159 Naranath Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 160 R 47+750 160 160 78 82 0 51.3 Subedi Om Prasad 160 122 Salle 8 165-1254 653 L 47+725 3813 20 0 20 3793 0.5 Subedi Netra Prsasad 161 1 Salle 8 165-1254 651 L 47+675 509 24 0 24 485 4.7 Subedi 162 24 Laxman Subedi Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 158 R 47+780 345 96 48 48 249 13.9
Nar Bahadur 163 Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 157 R 47+800 385 140 70 70 245 18.2 Chettri
104
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Harka Bahadur 164 19 Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 156 R 47+810 392 120 60 60 272 15.3 Homestead Sim Chettri Tej Bahadur 165 23 Surya Prasad Devdutta Arkhaule 6 165-1254 155 R 47+825 415 60 25 35 355 8.4 Subedi
Shamvu Prasad Hom Nath Jyotighar 166 Salle 8 165-1254 655 L 47+800 3075 40 0 40 3035 1.3 Homestead Chahar Subedi Subedi Subedi
Damber Bahadur 167 Salle 8 165-1254 672 L 47+850 1460 668 308 360 792 24.7 Bhujel Shamvu Prasad 168 Salle 8 165-1254 652 L 47+685 509 24 0 24 485 4.7 Subedi Netra Prasad 169 1 Homnath Jyotishwor Salle 8 165-1254 377 L 47+900 645 63 10 53 582 8.2 Homestead Chahar Subedi Bam Bahadur 170 136 Padam Lal Chandraman Salle 8 165-1254 365 L 47+910 480 63 10 53 417 11 Upland Sim Shrestha Man Bahadur Surya 171 Chandraman Salle 8 165-1254 366 R/L 47+910 485 454 181 273 31 56.3 Shrestha Bahadur 172 Bimal Shrestha Parsuram PadamLal Salle 8 165-1254 371 R 47+925 645 350 156 194 295 30.1
Surya Prasad 173 Devdutta Hridayanand Salle 8 165-1254 370 R 47+975 510 190 80 110 320 21.6 Subedi Surya Prasad 174 Devdutta Hridayanand Salle 8 165-1254 367 R 48+000 435 254 155 99 181 22.8 Subedi Surya Prasad 175 Devdutta Hridayanand Salle 8 165-1254 358 L 48+025 5825 495 180 315 5330 5.4 Subedi Surya Prasad 176 Devdutta Hridayanand Salle 8 165-1254 357 R 48+025 925 190 100 90 735 9.7 Subedi Laxmi Prasad 177 Netra Prasad Homnath Salle 8 165-1254 356 R/L 48+075 1005 754 360 394 251 39.2 Subedi 178 80 Tika Ram Subedi Ganga Dhar Hridayanand Salle 8 165-1254 355 R/L 48+120 1890 160 96 64 1730 3.4
Jay Prasad 179 25 Naranath Raghunath Salle 8 165-1254 343 L 48+120 1235 80 10 70 1155 5.7 Homestead Chahar Subedi Bisnhu Prasad 180 Kham Prasad Naranath Salle 8 165-1254 344 R/L 48+150 510 360 144 216 150 42.4 Subedi 181 Guna Raj Subedi Naranath Raghunath Salle 8 165-1254 353 R 48+175 300 31 0 31 269 10.3
182 Kumar Subedi Tankanath Naranath Salle 8 165-1254 352 R 48+200 615 540 216 324 75 52.7
Jay Prasad 183 25 Naranath Raghunath Salle 8 165-1254 354 R 48+210 345 127 40 87 218 25.2 Subedi
184 22 Kumar Subedi Tankanath Naranath Salle 8 165-1254 351 L 48+210 565 159 115 44 406 7.8 Upland Sim
Jay Prasad 185 25 Naranath Raghunath Salle 8 165-1254 350 L 48+230 375 30 0 30 345 8 Homestead Sim Subedi 186 Guna Raj Subedi Naranath Raghunath Salle 8 165-1254 349 L 48+250 370 95 48 47 275 12.7
105
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Shamvu Prasad 187 Salle 8 165-1254 659 L 48+275 318 45 20 25 273 7.9 Subedi
Om Prasad Homnath Jyoti Khar 188 122 Salle 8 165-1254 658 L 48+290 307 30 0 30 277 9.8 Homestead Chahar Subedi Subedi Subedi
189 24 Laxman Subedi Surya Prasad Devdutta Salle 8 165-1254 337 L 48+350 530 127 64 63 403 11.9 Upland Sim
Harka Bahadur 190 19 Surya Prasad Devdutta Salle 8 165-1254 336 L 48+400 875 286 150 136 589 15.5 Homestead Sim Chettri 191 80 Tikaram Subedi Gangadhar Hridayanand Salle 8 165-1254 332 L 48+425 600 156 48 108 444 18
192 124 Lekhnath Subedi Naranath Devdutta Salle 8 165-1254 331 L 48+450 655 240 105 135 415 20.6
Bhakta Bahadur 193 Salle 8 165-1254 671 L 48+580 430 30 10 20 400 4.7 Bhujel Amrit Bahadur 194 21 Salle 8 165-1254 679 L 48+600 1612 48 15 33 1564 2 Bhujel Damber Bahadur 195 Salle 8 165-1254 672 L 4+625 400 160 70 90 240 22.5 Bhujel Amrit Bahadur 196 21 Salle 8 165-1254 669 L 48+650 730 206 116 90 524 12.3 Bhujel Mrs Pasupati Bhakta 197 78 Kamal Salle 8 165-1254 305 L 48+675 2810 1302 500 802 1508 28.5 Upland Chahar Shrestha Bahadur Mrs Pasupati Bhakta 198 78 Kamal Salle 8 165-1214 304 48+825 7915 718 311 407 7197 5.1 Upland Chahar Shrestha Bahadur Mrs Pasupati Bhakta 199 78 Kamal Salle 8 165-1214 355 48+850 11713 2035 814 1221 9678 10.4 Upland Chahar Shrestha Bahadur Mrs Pasupati Bhakta 200 78 Kamal Salle 8 165-1214 605 L 48+875 2035 432 216 216 1603 10.6 Upland Sim Shrestha Bahadur
Dil Bahadur Surya 201 Chandraman Salle 8 165-1214 604 L 48+925 1545 283 100 183 1262 11.8 Shrestha Bahadur
Parsu Ram 202 Padam Lal Chandraman Arkhaule 6 165-1214 306 R 49+000 875 127 42 85 748 9.7 Shrestha
Ram Kumar 203 Arkhaule 6 165-1214 328 R 49+025 280 95 40 55 185 19.6 Shrestha Lal Bahadur 204 84 Harka Man Siddhi Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 294 L 49+000 3470 20 0 20 3450 0.6 Upland Chahar Shrestha Bishnu Kumar 205 321 Arkhaule 6 165-1214 329 R 49+030 165 105 42 63 60 38.2 Shrestha 206 133 Man Kaji Shrestha Arkhaule 6 165-1214 330 R 49+040 178 75 30 45 103 25.3
Gauri Narayan 207 Arkhaule 6 165-1214 331 R 49+045 605 136 54 82 469 13.6 Shrestha Parsu Ram 208 Padam Lal Chandra Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 304 L 49+050 990 570 228 342 420 34.5 Shrestha
106
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Man Bdr Surya Bdr. 209 133 Mankaji shrestha Arkhaule 6 165-1214 335 R 49+080 300 88 22 66 212 22 Upland Sim shrestha Shrestha
Bam Bahadur 210 136 Padam Lal Chandra Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 302 R/L 49+100 2240 1050 420 630 1190 28.1 Upland Sim Shrestha Ganga Bahadur Khadga 211 81 Harka Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 299 R 49+170 2150 10 0 10 2140 0.5 Homestead Sim Shrestha Bahadur Ganga Bahadur Khadga 212 81 Harka Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 295 L 49+175 530 20 0 20 510 3.8 Upland Chahar Shrestha Bahadur Sita Kumari 213 84 Lal Bahadur Harka Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 298 L 49+210 345 63 25 38 282 11 Upland Chahar Shrestha Ganga Bahadur Khadga 214 81 Harka Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 297 L 49+200 990 286 124 162 704 16.4 Upland Chahar Shrestha Bahadur Bhakta 215 Kamal Shrestha Dhan Narayan Arkhaule 6 165-1214 272 R 49+175 2670 10 0 10 2660 0.4 Bahadur Toshal Kumar Hastha 216 Kritiman Arkhaule 6 165-1214 277 R 49+200 1800 302 140 162 1498 9 Shrestha Bahadur Dil Bahadur Surya 217 131 Chandra Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 278 L 49+210 1910 159 10 149 1751 7.8 Shrestha Bahadur Bishnu Kumar 218 321 Arkhaule 6 165-1214 323 L 49+230 4640 47 0 47 4593 1 Shrestha 219 133 Man Kaji Shrestha Arkhaule 6 165-1214 322 L 49+250 190 20 0 20 170 10.5
Til Bahadur Chandra 220 77 Pratap Singh Arkhaule 6 165-1214 276 R 49+250 635 75 10 65 560 10.2 Shrestha Bahadur Til Bahadur Chandra 221 77 Pratap Singh Arkhaule 6 165-1214 274 R 49+350 115 115 0 115 0 100 Shrestha Bahadur Tanka Bahadur Padam Chandra 222 Arkhaule 6 165-1214 273 R/L 49+350 170 170 44 126 0 74.1 Shrestha Bahadur Bahadur Khadga Bahadur Chandra 223 130 Pratap Singh Arkhaule 6 165-1214 275 R/L 29+275 1190 818 327 491 372 41.3 Upland Sim Shrestha Bahadur Tanka Bahadur Padam Chandra 224 Arkhaule 6 165-1214 266 L 49+350 935 254 10 244 681 26.1 Shrestha Bahadur Bahadur Khadga Bahadur 225 81 Harka Man Siddhi Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 268 R 49+400 5280 1186 474 712 4094 13.5 Homestead Sim Shrestha
Padam Bahadur Padam Bdr. Jay Narayan 226 141 Arkhaule 6 165-1214 348 R 49+440 820 20 0 20 800 2.4 Homestead Sim Shrestha Shrestha Shrestha
227 55 Shyam Laxmi Rai Bharna rai hasta Bdr rai Arkhaule 6 165-1214 347 R 49+460 190 20 0 20 170 10.5 Homestead Sim
Krishna Kumari 228 135 Arkhaule 6 165-1214 351 L 49+480 840 206 98 108 634 12.9 Shrestha
ParsuRam 229 Padam Lal Chandraman Arkhaule 6 165-1214 27 R/L 49+520 2580 870 348 522 1710 20.2 Shrestha
Dhan Bahadur bhuwan 230 82 Shrestha/Nanda singh Arkhaule 6 165-1214 31 R 49+560 2510 450 180 270 2060 10.8 Homestead Sim
Kumari Shrestha Shrestha
107
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Badri Kumari 231 68 Man Bahadur Bhadra Man Arkhaule 6 165-1214 23 L 49+600 585 63 10 53 522 9.1 Upland Sim Shrestha Khadga Chandra 232 130 Gyan Kumari Arkhaule 6 165-1214 21 R 49+600 1590 254 155 99 1336 6.2 Bahadur Bahadur Durga Mani 233 37 Bhadra Man Dhanju Ram Arkhaule 6 165-1214 15 R/L 49+640 1770 930 465 465 840 26.3 Upland Sim Shrestha Til Bahadur Chandra 234 77 Pratap Singh Arkhaule 6 165-1214 16 R 49+640 705 270 108 162 435 23 Shrestha Bahadur
235 4 Moti Lal Shrestha Bhadra Man Dhanju Ram Arkhaule 6 165-1214 14 L 49+680 70 20 0 20 50 28.6 Homestead Sim
Chandra Kumari 236 65 Dal Bahadur Devnarayan Arkhaule 5 165-1214 242 R 49+700 955 254 92 162 701 17 Homestead Sim Shrestha Man Bahadur Rudra 237 132 Dev Narayan Arkhaule 5 165-1214 239 L 49+720 835 496 271 225 339 26.9 Homestead Sim Shrestha Narayan Durga Mani 238 37 Bhadra Man Dhanju Ram Arkhaule 5 165-1214 241 L 49+740 565 180 90 90 385 15.9 Shrestha Man Bahadur 239 68 Bhadra Man Dhanju Ram Arkhaule 5 165-1214 240 R/L 49+760 1310 300 120 180 1010 13.7 Homestead Sim Shrestha Thir Kumar 240 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 691 R/L 49+780 90 90 0 90 0 100 Shrestha Chakra Bahadur 241 Bakhat Bdr. Arkhaule 5 165-1214 690 R/L 49+785 90 90 0 90 0 100 Upland Sim Shrestha Bakhat Bahadur Harka 242 101 DhanKrishna Arkhaule 5 165-1214 692 R/L 49+790 90 60 30 30 30 33.3 Shrestha Bahadur Ram Bahadur 243 69 Harka Bdr. Arkhaule 5 165-1214 689 R 49+760 3050 845 187 658 2205 21.6 Upland Sim Shrestha Hari Prasad 244 KubirMan Rajbir Arkhaule 5 165-1214 255 R 49+840 565 63 18 45 502 8 Shrestha Ratna 245 Bimala Shrestha Keshar Arkhaule 5 165-1214 254 R 49+835 655 63 18 45 592 6.9 Bahadur Padam Kumari 246 126 Hari Bhakta Dhan Bahadur Arkhaule 5 165-1214 256 R 49+850 685 63 18 45 622 6.6 Homestead Sim Shrestha Hari Prasad 247 KubirMan Rajbir Arkhaule 5 165-1214 253 R 49+865 645 47 20 27 598 4.2 Shrestha Chauhan Kumar Thim Bdr. 248 138 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 614 R/L 49+880 158 158 84 74 0 46.8 Homestead Sim Shrestha Shrestha Nir Kumar 249 70 Bhim Bdr. Arkhaule 5 165-1214 615 R/L 49+900 318 318 168 150 0 47.2 Upland Sim Shrestha Khadga Bahadur 250 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 616 R/L 49+920 158 158 72 86 0 54.4 Shrestha Bhim Bahadur 251 70 Bhim Bdr. Arkhaule 5 165-1214 617 R 49+930 1842 286 143 143 1556 7.8 Upland Sim Shrestha Ram Bahadur 252 69 Harka Bdr. Arkhaule 5 165-1214 708 L 49+950 400 95 20 75 305 18.8 Homestead Sim Shrestha Rajan Kumar 253 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 628 L 49+940 145 20 0 20 125 13.8 Shrestha Tej Kumar 254 83 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 629 L 49+945 145 30 10 20 115 13.8 Shrestha
108
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Sabda Kumar Jagat Bdr. 255 36 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 596 L 49+950 310 111 57 54 199 17.4 Homestead Sim Shrestha Shrestha
Rajan Kumar 256 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 597 L 49+970 240 111 66 45 129 18.8 Shrestha Bal Kumar 257 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 598 L 49+980 110 62 0 62 48 56.4 Shrestha Lal Bahadur 258 84 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 582 L 49+980 327 10 0 10 317 3.1 Shrestha Padam Kumari 259 126 Hari Bhakta Dhan Bahadur Arkhaule 5 165-1214 128 L 50+000 425 10 0 10 415 2.4 Homestead Chahar Shrestha Dhan Bahadur Prithvi 260 71 Nardal Arkhaule 5 165-1214 129 L 49+990 365 20 0 20 345 5.5 Homestead Chahar Magar Bahadur Ram Bahadur Harka 261 Dev Narayan Arkhaule 5 165-1214 264 R/L 49+990 185 80 34 46 105 24.9 Shrestha Bahadur
262 72 Gopal Shrestha Lalit Bahadur Kaji Man Arkhaule 5 165-1214 554 R/L 50+060 40 40 20 20 0 50 Homestead Chahar
Durga Mani 263 37 Bhadra Man Dhanju Ram Arkhaule 5 165-1214 553 R 50+070 30 30 10 20 0 66.7 Shrestha Man Kumari 264 Tej Bahadur Moti lal Arkhaule 5 165-1214 109 R 50+100 2460 95 10 85 2365 3.5 Shrestha Ram Kumar Bakhat 265 Harka Arkhaule 5 165-1214 110 R 50+120 405 354 81 273 51 67.4 Shrestha Bahadur Raj Kumar 266 32 Hari Prasad Kubir Man Arkhaule 5 165-1214 111 R 50+140 110 63 0 63 47 57.3 Homestead Sim Shrestha Shammir 267 Dhan Harka Rai Buddhi Man Arkhaule 5 165-1214 116 R 50+080 255 31 10 21 224 8.2 Dhoj Bal Kumari 268 57 Man Bahadur Bhadra Man Arkhaule 5 165-1214 115 R 50+085 145 16 10 6 129 4.1 Homestead Chahar Shrestha Ram Kumar Bakhat 269 Harka Arkhaule 5 165-1214 114 R 50+090 80 31 10 21 49 26.3 Shrestha Bahadur 270 72 Gopal Shrestha Lalit Bahadur Kaji Man Arkhaule 5 165-1214 120 L 50+060 30 15 0 15 15 50
Durga Mani 271 37 Bhadra Man Dhanju Ram Arkhaule 5 165-1214 119 L 50+065 40 30 0 30 10 75 Homestead Chahar Shrestha Raj Kumar 272 32 Hari Prasad Kubir Man Arkhaule 5 165-1214 113 L 50+080 40 30 0 30 10 75 Homestead Chahar Shrestha Tosal Kumar Hasta 273 Kritiman Arkhaule 5 165-1214 112 L 50+090 30 20 0 20 10 66.7 Shrestha Bahadur Hari Bhakta Dhan Mathwar 274 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 121 L 30 15 0 15 15 50 Shrestha Bahadur Singh Lekh Kumari 275 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 682 R 185 66 31 35 119 18.9 Shrestha 276 Sharada Shrestha Arkhaule 5 165-1214 683 R 155 38 18 20 117 12.9
277 Sharada Shrestha Arkhaule 5 165-1214 686 R 90 80 35 45 10 50
109
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Road of 278 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 685 R 12 12 0 12 0 100 Government
279 9 Sharada Shrestha Bhim Bdr. Arkhaule 5 165-1214 715 R 727 10 0 10 717 1.4 Homestead Sim
Bal Kumar Jagat 280 31 Kul Bahadur Arkhaule 5 165-1214 555 L 50+100 60 15 0 15 45 25 Shrestha Bahadur Dil Bahadur Surya Chandra 281 131 Arkhaule 5 165-1214 556 L 50+105 50 15 0 15 35 30 Homestead Chahar Shrestha Bahadur Bahadur Bhakta 282 Kamal Shrestha Dhan Narayan Arkhaule 5 165-1214 557 L 50+110 50 15 0 15 35 30 Bahadur Khadga Bahadur Chandra 283 Pratap Singh Arkhaule 5 165-1214 558 L 50+115 50 15 0 15 35 30 Shrestha Bahadur 284 Dhanjit Rai Jas Raj Kabir Man Arkhaule 5 165-1214 559 L 50+120 60 15 0 15 45 25
Tanka Nath 285 139 Khem Raj Subedi Arkhaule 5 165-1214 661 L 50+180 4842 348 150 198 4494 4.1 Homestead Sim Subedi
286 66 Ramesh Puri Ramesh Arkhaule 5 165-1214 636 L 50+160 620 111 48 63 509 10.2 Homestead
Tej Kumar 287 83 Jagat Bdr Arkhaule 5 165-1214 639 L 50+180 205 63 20 43 142 21 Homestead Chahar Shrestha 288 Dhan Hira Rai Arkhaule 5 165-1215 670 R 50+210 110 31 10 21 79 19.1
Tej Kumar 289 83 Arkhaule 5 165-1215 671 R 50+215 295 15 0 15 280 5.1 Shrestha
290 6 Kamal Prasd Puri Gopilal Puri Arkhaule 5 165-1215 637 R 50+220 190 47 10 37 143 19.5 Homestead Sim
Devi Prasad 291 Tankanath Karmabir Arkhaule 5 165-1215 400 R 50+240 1370 47 10 37 1323 2.7 Subedi Bhakta Bishnu 292 Dev Maya Giri Arkhaule 5 165-1215 399 R 50+280 400 206 116 90 194 22.5 Bahadur Bahadur Indra Bahadur 293 Dadi Ram Tika Ram Arkhaule 5 165-1215 394 L 50+380 2360 260 26 234 2100 9.9 Puri 294 ManMaya Pulami Arkhaule 5 165-1215 633 L 50+440 4980 216 54 162 4764 3.3
Nar Prasad 295 140 Tankanath Karnabir Arkhaule 5 165-1215 398 R 50+340 2670 810 324 486 1860 18.2 Homestead Sim Subedi 296 Hira Maya Pulami Arkhaule 5 165-1215 632 R 50+520 4900 143 53 90 4757 1.8
Jay Krisna 297 45 Tek Bahadur Puri Arkhaule 5 165-1215 642 R 50+520 800 47 10 37 753 4.6 Upland Sim Puri
298 58 Saraswoti pPuri Prakash Puri Arkhaule 5 165-1215 640 R 50+530 270 63 18 45 207 16.7 Upland
299 3 Devi Maya Puri Mukta Bdr. Arkhaule 5 165-1215 641 R 50+540 265 47 10 37 218 14 Homestead Sim
300 Taraman Rai Arkhaule 5 165-1215 721 R 50+560 178 47 10 37 131 20.8
110
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Khadga Bahadur 301 73 Arkhaule 5 165-1215 720 R 50+570 178 30 10 20 148 11.2 Khatri 302 Lila Nath Bhandari Arkhaule 5 165-1215 645 R 50+575 240 47 10 37 193 15.4
303 Min Bhandari Arkhaule 5 165-1215 644 R 50+580 240 69 20 49 171 20.4
Bhakta Bishnu 304 Thir Bahadur Giri Arkhaule 5 165-1215 382 L 50+600 18690 79 0 79 18611 0.4 Bahadur Bahadur
305 64 Lal Kaji Shrestha Purna Kumar Kaji Man Arkhaule 5 165-1215 433 R 50+620 2610 900 260 640 1710 24.5 Homestead Sim
306 Lekh Nath Subedi Tankanath Karnakhar Arkhaule 5 165-1215 462 R 50+650 1170 47 29 18 1123 1.5
Nar Prasad 307 Tankanath Karnakhar Arkhaule 5 165-1215 463 R 50+660 300 268 58 210 32 70 Subedi Tej Kumar 308 83 Jagat Bdr Arkhaule 5 165-1215 568 L 50+670 1985 127 82 45 1858 2.3 Homestead Sim Shrestha Sabda Kumar 309 36 Arkhaule 5 165-1215 567 L 50+720 1985 31 0 31 1954 1.6 Shrestha 310 Suk Raj Rai Arkhaule 5 165-1215 673 R 50+740 1432 381 156 225 1051 15.7
Shanta 311 Arkhaule 5 165-1215 647 R/L 50+780 75 75 0 75 0 100 Thapamagar Tej Kumar 312 83 Arkhaule 5 165-1215 723 R/L 50+770 2925 731 416 315 2194 10.8 Shrestha 313 Daya Laxmi Rai Arkhaule 5 165-1215 722 R 150 118 73 45 32 30
314 142 ………………... Arkhaule 5 165-1215 658 R/L 50+820 75 75 0 75 0 100
315 11 Shiva Raj Rai Arkhaule 5 165-1215 657 R/L 50+825 75 75 0 75 0 100
316 Dhan Kumari Rai Arkhaule 5 165-1215 655 R/L 50+840 75 75 0 75 0 100
317 56 Laxman Rai Krisna Bdr. Arkhaule 5 165-1215 710 R/L 50+850 80 80 0 80 0 100 Upland Sim
Jagat Bahadur 318 Arkhaule 5 165-1215 663 R 50+780 2544 63 0 63 2481 2.5 Shrestha Tej Kumar 319 83 Arkhaule 5 165-1215 662 R 50+920 1736 477 190 287 1259 16.5 Shrestha 320 Lila Kant Subedi Devi Prasad Ranga Lal Arkhaule 5 165-1215 474 R 50+900 3440 63 18 45 3377 1.3
Okhal 321 35 Mana Maya Rai Sarbadhan Arkhaule 5 165-1215 375 R 50+920 285 190 35 155 95 54.4 Upland Sim Bahadur
322 38 Santa Sher Rai Sarbadhan Chandra Dhoj Arkhaule 5 165-1215 374 R 50+960 425 95 50 45 330 10.6 Upland Sim
323 Suk Raj Rai Arkhaule 5 165-1215 676 R/L 50+980 15882 3900 1560 2340 11982 14.7
324 Prem Bahadur Rai Arkhaule 5 165-1215 674 L 51+000 318 150 60 90 168 28.3
111
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Min Bahadur 325 Arkhaule 5 165-1215 668 L 51+310 390 47 0 47 343 12.1 Biswokarma Man Bahadur 326 68 Bhadra Man Dhanju Ram Arkhaule 5 165-1215 370 R/L 51+260 2030 600 240 360 1430 17.7 Upland Sim Shrestha 327 Tika Ram Giri Prata[ KabiRaj Arkhaule 5 165-1215 369 R 51+300 2010 222 150 72 1788 3.6
328 8 Chabilal Giri Narta Lal Bajra Lal Arkhaule 5 165-1215 475 R/L 51+320 26660 1200 480 720 25460 2.7 Upland Sim
Surya Prasad 329 Devdutta Hemu Lal Arkhaule 5 165-1215 476 R 51+400 5910 909 303 606 5001 10.3 Subedi Surya Prasad 330 137 Devdutta Hemu Lal Arkhaule 5 165-1215 477 L 51+460 4040 1202 400 802 2838 19.9 Homestead Sim Subedi Dhan Kumari Krishna 331 2 Ganga Prasad Arkhaule 5 165-1215 478 L 3630 20 0 20 3610 0.6 Pokheral Prasad Phul Kumari 332 Arkhaule 4 165-1215 311 L 51+545 6041 750 300 450 5291 7.4 Shrestha Prithaman 333 144 Sahar Man Kami Arkhaule 4 165-1215 330 L 51+620 509 95 50 45 414 8.8 Homestead Chahar Kaami Sahar Man 334 DhanBir Sare Arkhaule 4 165-1215 7 L 51+640 1340 143 10 133 1197 9.9 Biswokarma 335 Surya Lal Giri Shiva Lal Hasta Lal Arkhaule 4 165-1215 8 L 51+720 4440 150 0 150 4290 3.4
336 41 Aite Biswokarma Raghu Bir ManiKarna Arkhaule 4 165-1215 27 R 51+640 4760 1830 732 1098 2930 23.1
Yagya Prasad 337 Hari Prasad Baijanath Arkhaule 4 165-1215 26 R 51+760 1430 480 264 216 950 15.1 Ghimire Ganga Bahadur 338 Dharma Dhoj Dhoju Arkhaule 4 165-1215 17 R 51+800 12750 3159 1263 1896 9591 14.9 Giri 339 41 Aite Biswokarma Raghu Bir ManiKarna Arkhaule 4 165-1215 14 L 51+920 5220 174 0 174 5046 3.3
Khadga 340 52 Tej Bahadur Puri Damber Dhoj Arkhaule 4 165-1216 337 L 52+070 5950 454 112 342 5496 5.7 Bahadur Narayan Prasad 341 123 Hari Prasad Arkhaule 4 165-1216 325 L 52+070 1345 159 30 129 1186 9.6 Upland Chahar Ghimire
342 216 Jib Raj Ghimire Hari Prasad Arkhaule 4 165-1176 324 L 52+125 1345 190 154 36 1155 2.7 Upland
Yagyaswor 343 215 Hari Prasad Arkhaule 4 165-1176 323 L 52+170 1345 20 0 20 1325 1.5 Upland Ghimire …………………… 344 Arkhaule 2 165-1176 32 R 52+390 60930 2100 840 1260 58830 2.1 ……………. Ganga Bahadur Purna 345 Bhuvan Arkhaule 2 165-1176 36 R ]52390 18310 2850 1140 1710 15460 9.3 Puri Bahadur Man Bahadur Dhan 346 Laxman Arkhaule 2 165-1176 33 R 52+640 3020 360 90 270 2660 8.9 Magar Bahadur 347 Khadga Kumari Arkhaule 2 165-1176 274 R 52+700 1544 108 28 80 1436 5.2
Narayan Prasad 348 123 Hari Prasad Arkhaule 2 165-1176 311 R 52+710 1041 96 24 72 945 6.9 Upland Chahar Ghimire
112
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Yagyaswor 349 215 Arkhaule 2 165-1176 310 R 52+730 1043 108 27 81 935 7.8 Ghimire Yagyaswor 350 215 Hari Prasad Arkhaule 2 165-1176 276 R 52+745 1544 187 88 99 1357 6.4 Upland Ghimire Pyari Lal 351 Arkhaule 2 165-1176 45 L 52+725 760 174 102 72 586 9.5 Giri/Sapan Lal Giri
352 216 Jib Raj Ghimire Hari Prasad Arkhaule 2 165-1176 277 R 52+770 1544 190 82 108 1354 7 Upland
353 Kumar Puri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 291 R 52+795 410 70 25 45 340 11
Tilak Bahadur 354 61 Kaji Man Arkhaule 2 165-1176 292 R 52+808 200 56 24 32 144 16 Homestead Chahar Shrestha Narayan Prasad 355 123 Hari Prasad Arkhaule 2 165-1176 293 R 52+810 934 128 56 72 806 7.7 Upland Chahar Ghimire 356 Dig Bir Rai Arkhaule 2 165-1176 273 L 52+825 240 112 49 63 128 26.3
357 Hira Kumari Rai Arkhaule 2 165-1176 272 L 52+820 80 35 0 35 45 43.8
Dambar Bahadur 358 Arkhaule 2 165-1176 244 L 52+860 230 100 55 45 130 19.6 Puri
359 87 Chet Nath Puri Lal Bdr Arkhaule 2 165-1176 243 R 52+870 190 56 24 32 134 16.8 Upland Sim
360 Lal Bahadur Puri Kashi ShreeLal Arkhaule 2 165-1176 49 R 52+870 120 63 40 23 57 19.2
361 60 Shanker Puri Moti Lal Kabir Dhoj Arkhaule 2 165-1176 50 R 52+875 120 63 40 23 57 19.2 Homestead Chahar
Khadga Bahadur 362 134 Damber Dhoj Kashi Arkhaule 2 165-1176 51 R 85+880 120 63 40 23 57 19.2 Homestead Chahar Puri Krishna Bahadur 363 5 Puri/Jagat Krisna Bdr. Arkhaule 2 165-1176 52 R 52+885 120 63 30 33 57 27.5 Homestead Chahar
Bahadur Puri
364 Chabi Lal Puri Kapur Dhoj Damodar Arkhaule 2 165-1176 55 L 52+885 120 30 0 30 90 25
365 87 Chet Nath Puri Lal Bdr Arkhaule 2 165-1176 294 R 60 60 0 60 0 100 Homestead Sim
366 40 Tirtha Kumari Puri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 295 R 60 60 0 60 0 100
367 Hok Raj Puri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 296 R 60 60 0 60 0 100
Dhan Bahadur 368 39 Lal Bdr. Arkhaule 2 165-1176 297 R 60 60 0 60 0 100 Homestead Sim Puri
369 59 Ram Kala Rai Amrit Bdr. Arkhaule 2 165-1176 283 R 75 47 10 37 28 49.3 Homestead Chahar
370 14 Shiva Lal Giri Hastalal Arkhaule 2 165-1176 284 R 145 31 10 21 114 14.5 Upland Chahar
371 15 Tej Bahadur Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 318 L 5545 1050 420 630 4495 11.4
113
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
372 14 Shiva Lal Giri Hastalal Arkhaule 2 165-1176 328 L 5525 320 40 280 5205 5.1 Upland Chahar
373 86 Padam Raj Giri Shiv lal Arkhaule 2 165-1176 321 L 3052 300 120 180 2752 5.9 Upland Chahar
Til Bahadur 374 Arkhaule 2 165-1176 316 L 3562 300 120 180 3262 5.1 Shrestha
375 14 Shiva Lal Giri Hastalal Arkhaule 2 165-1176 327 L 2545 1350 540 810 1195 31.8 Upland Chahar
376 Ratna Lal Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 323 L 2545 79 34 45 2466 1.8
377 Surja Lal Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 313 L 4580 240 60 180 4340 3.9
378 Ratna Lal Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 325 L 1015 127 0 127 888 12.5
379 62 Dilli Bahadur Rai Amrit Bdr. Arkhaule 2 165-1176 285 95 10 0 10 85 10.5 Upland Chahar
Krishna Maya 380 Arkhaule 2 165-1176 330 115 25 10 15 90 13 Sanyasi 381 Surja Lal Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 331 120 30 10 20 90 16.7
382 Nar Bahadur Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 332 115 50 8 42 65 36.5
383 54 Til Bahadur Giri Shiv lal Arkhaule 2 165-1176 333 115 24 8 16 91 13.9 Upland Chahar
384 15 Tej Bahadur Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 334 115 20 8 12 95 10.4
Padam Bahadur 385 Arkhaule 2 165-1176 335 115 35 15 20 80 17.4 Giri 386 Ratna Lal Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 336 115 35 15 20 80 17.4
387 14 Shiva Lal Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 337 115 20 10 10 95 8.7
388 Rajendra Puri DilliRam Kabir Dhoj Arkhaule 2 165-1176 81 53+420 10310 200 25 175 10110 1.7
389 Rajendra Puri DilliRam Kabir Dhoj Arkhaule 2 165-1177 82 R 53+520 7240 1479 591 888 5761 12.3
Puspa Lal Puri/Kumar 390 53 Lal bdr. Arkhaule 2 165-1177 173 R/L 53+610 1405 750 300 450 655 32 Upland Chahar Puri/Chudamani Puri
391 Bir Bahadur Giri Harka Raj Ram Chandra Arkhaule 2 165-1177 188 R/L 53+720 730 365 158 207 365 28.4
Ratna Bahadur 392 Nanda Lal Narayan Arkhaule 2 165-1177 189 R 53+720 7020 1495 245 1250 5525 17.8 Puri 393 Dan Bahadur Giri Harka Raj Ram Chandra Arkhaule 2 165-1177 185 L 53+740 1810 127 82 45 1683 2.5
394 Surya Puri Nain Dhoj Chandra Lal Arkhaule 2 165-1177 191 L 53+760 3340 300 165 135 3040 4
114
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Ganga Bahadur 395 Harka Raj Ram Chandra Arkhaule 2 165-1177 184 L 53+760 925 540 216 324 385 35 Giri 396 Gokul Giri Arkhaule 2 165-1177 270 R 53+820 270 238 119 119 32 44.1
Ganga Bahadur 397 Harka Raj RamChandra Arkhaule 2 165-1177 182 R 53+840 470 302 140 162 168 34.5 Giri
398 143 Ganga Maya Giri Harka Raj RamChandra Arkhaule 2 165-1177 224 R/L 53+880 750 413 107 306 337 40.8 Upland
399 Gokul Giri Harka Raj RamChandra Arkhaule 2 165-1177 225 L 53+890 400 47 20 27 353 6.8
Ganga Bahadur 400 Harka Raj RamChandra Arkhaule 2 165-1177 222 R 53+900 500 180 72 108 320 21.6 Giri 401 Gokul Giri Harka Raj RamChandra Arkhaule 2 165-1177 223 L 53+880 930 31 10 21 899 2.3
402 13 AbiKeshar Puri RanaDhoj Benu Arkhaule 2 165-1177 192 R 53+910 4640 508 254 254 4132 5.5 Upland Sim
403 67 Tika Bahadur Puri Rana Dhoj Benu Arkhaule 2 165-1177 193 R 53+960 3850 780 312 468 3070 12.2 Upland Sim
404 34 Lattu Puri Nanda Raj Narayan Arkhaule 2 165-1177 190 R/L 54+040 2940 570 228 342 2370 11.6 Upland Sim
405 Padam Lal Subedi Arkhaule 2 165-1177 170 R 54+230 180 111 21 90 69 50
406 Gopi Lal Puri Ranga Lal Narayan Arkhaule 2 165-1177 75 L 54+230 1005 156 56 100 849 10
Chandra 407 Dil Bahadur Puri Mitra Lal Arkhaule 2 165-1177 171 R/L 54+280 240 240 105 135 0 56.3 Bahadur 408 Sambhu Puri Arkhaule 2 165-1177 74 R/L 54+300 270 270 0 270 0 100
409 85 Tul Maya Puri Ratna Nanda Raj Arkhaule 2 165-1177 73 R 54+230 1405 190 122 68 1215 4.8
Dhan 410 74 Tul Maya Puri Lattu Puri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 78 R/L 2480 900 360 540 1580 21.8 Upland Chahar Bahadur Dhan Bahadur 411 39 Lal Bdr. Arkhaule 2 165-1176 263 R 1653 450 225 225 1203 13.6 Upland Sim Puri
412 74 Tul Maya Puri Dhan Bdr Arkhaule 2 165-1176 282 R 54+480 1208 204 51 153 1004 12.7 Upland Chahar
Jagat Bahadur 413 12 Arkhaule 2 165-1176 280 R 54+520 1729 10 0 10 1719 0.6 Puri Krishna 414 5 Ganga Maya Puri Kagi Man Arkhaule 2 165-1176 65 R/L 54+520 5000 1767 706 1061 3233 21.2 Upland Chahar Bahadur
415 14 Shiva Lal Giri Hastalal Arkhaule 2 165-1176 328 L 54+600 1525 174 39 135 1351 8.9 Upland Chahar
Krishna 416 5 Ganga Maya Puri Kagi Man Arkhaule 2 165-1176 66 R/L 54+600 17760 3000 1200 1800 14760 10.1 Upland Chahar Bahadur Dhan 417 74 Tul Maya Puri Lattu Puri Arkhaule 2 165-1176 67 L 54+760 8060 1650 660 990 6410 12.3 Upland Chahar Bahadur 418 Ram Bahadur Puri Hasta Lal Shyam Lal Arkhaule 2 165-1177 161 R/L 55+000 5020 1500 600 900 3520 17.9
115
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
419 67 Tika Bahadur Puri Rana Dhoj Benu Arkhaule 2 165-1177 163 R/L 55+160 4500 810 324 486 3690 10.8 Upland Chahar
Dhan 420 Tul Maya Puri Kagi Man Arkhaule 1 165-1177 373 L 55+540 4350 376 195 181 3974 4.2 Bahadur
421 34 Lattu Puri Nanda Raj Narayan Arkhaule 1 165-1177 380 L 55+570 1230 95 50 45 1135 3.7 Upland Chahar
422 Sagun Giri Kedar Giri Senu Giri Arkhaule 1 165-1177 381 R 55+580 1740 63 18 45 1677 2.6
423 Moti Raj Puri Chabi Lal Kabir Dhoj Arkhaule 1 165-1177 384 L 55+620 500 333 180 153 167 30.6
424 Moti Raj Puri Chabi Lal Kabir Dhoj Arkhaule 1 165-1177 385 R 56+120 3670 95 20 75 3575 2
Krishna Bahadur 425 Arkhaule 1 165-1177 388 L 56+490 815 477 190 287 338 35.2 Puri 426 Banmara Arkhaule 1 165-1177 389 R/L 56+760 2180 1319 527 792 861 36.3
Krishna Bahadur 427 Arkhaule 1 165-1177 390 R/L 56+760 1080 540 216 324 540 30 Puri Krishna Bahadur 428 Arkhaule 1 165-1177 387 L 56+500 5250 1500 600 900 3750 17.1 Puri Krishna Bahadur 429 Arkhaule 1 165-1177 393 L 56+790 1620 600 240 360 1020 22.2 Puri Krishna Bahadur 430 Arkhaule 1 165-1177 394 L 56+840 1455 420 168 252 1035 17.3 Puri Krishna Bahadur 431 Arkhaule 1 165-1177 395 L 56+880 1860 570 228 342 1290 18.4 Puri Krishna Bahadur 432 Arkhaule 1 165-1177 396 L 56+900 2470 1120 448 672 1350 27.2 Puri Krishna Bahadur 433 Arkhaule 1 165-1177 397 R 56+900 1340 62 20 42 1278 3.1 Puri
434 2 Bhot Bahadur Rai Man Bahadur Dharan Singh Buipa 6 165-1178 7 L 57+000 8260 2160 864 1296 6100 15.7 Homestead Chahar
435 128 Shree Dhoj Rai Man Bahadur Dharan Singh 165-1178 8 R 56+980 5950 1050 420 630 4900 10.6 Upland Chahar
436 48 Bal Bahadur Rai Jit Bahadur Dharan Singh 165-1178 541 R 57+200 4540 570 228 342 3970 7.5
Harke Bahadur 437 Jit Bahadur Dharan Singh 165-1178 539 L 57+240 9380 1200 480 720 8180 7.7 Rai 438 48 Bal Bahadur Rai Jit Bahadur Dharan Singh 165-1178 540 R/L 57+300 1380 600 200 400 780 29
439 Tara Rai LalBahadur Dharan Singh 165-1178 536 R/L 57+340 2635 807 322 485 1828 18.4
440 48 Bal Bahadur Rai Jit Bahadur Dharan Singh 165-1178 538 R/L 57+380 4695 63 36 27 4632 0.6
441 49 Raj Kumar Rai Lal Bahadur Dharan Singh 165-1178 535 R/L 57+400 4895 1080 432 648 3815 13.2 Homestead Chahar
442 48 Bal Bahadur Rai Jit Bahadur Dharan Singh 165-1178 527 R/L 57+480 2095 900 360 540 1195 25.8
116
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Harka Bahadur 443 Jit Bahadur Dharan Singh Buipa 6 165-1178 526 R/L 57+550 1240 600 240 360 640 29 Rai 444 Jit Bahadur Giri Megdhan Dabbu Nunthala 1 165-1178 311 R 57+720 2650 95 10 85 2555 3.2
445 179 Lila Bahadur Rai Megdhan Dabbu 165-1178 21 R 57+720 1420 1320 528 792 100 55.8
446 Jit Bahadur Rai Megdhan Dabbu 165-1178 23 R/L 57+740 345 100 0 100 245 29
447 Dewan Rai 165-1178 289 R 57+830 540 150 60 90 390 16.7
448 Dhan Bahadur Rai 165-1178 290 R 57+840 565 150 60 90 415 15.9
Padam Sundar 449 165-1178 291 R 57+850 573 210 84 126 363 22 Rai 450 Madhubar Rai 165-1178 292 R 57+860 545 210 85 125 335 22.9
Krishna Bahadur 451 165-1178 293 R 57+880 762 260 143 117 502 15.4 Rai Harka 452 Raghubir Rai Jasbir 165-1178 41 L 57+930 1285 508 238 270 777 21 Bahadur Ramesh Kumar Karna Bdr. 453 186 165-1138 286 R 58+180 2845 148 30 118 2697 4.1 Upland Chahar Rai Rai Sarko Dhan 454 Nir Bahadur Rai Sarup Dal 165-1138 180 L 58+200 1045 10 0 10 1035 1 Rai
455 180 Dhan Bahadur Rai Pusta Man Mahat Singh 165-1138 184 R 58+230 6145 840 462 378 5305 6.2 Upland Chahar
Karna 456 185 Ram Sundar Rai Lohar Man 165-1138 181 L 58+230 1090 60 20 40 1030 3.7 Bahadur 457 Tirtha Raj Rai Garva Raj Dharma Raj 165-1138 185 R 58+345 1965 544 238 306 1421 15.6
458 Maul Bahadur Rai TulaMan Jasbir 165-1138 186 R 58+420 825 460 308 152 365 18.4
Maul 459 Dipak Kumar Rai Tula Man 165-1138 187 R 58+470 825 143 53 90 682 10.9 Bahadur 460 Dewan Rai 165-1138 267 R 58+500 550 10 0 10 540 1.8
461 B.B. Shova Rai 165-1138 268 R 58+525 2110 111 10 101 1999 4.8
462 180 Bam Bahadur Rai Dhan Bdr 165-1138 306 R 58+570 300 127 37 90 173 30 Upland Chahar
463 251 Anusha Rai Kumar Kaji 165-1138 305 R 58+580 508 63 23 40 445 7.9 Upland Chahar
Kumar Bahadur 464 165-1138 307 R 58+620 665 381 228 153 284 23 Rai 465 Uttam Kumar Rai Naulakhe Tirtha Singh Nunthala 1 165-1138 199 R 58+670 955 600 240 360 355 37.7
466 167 Gadul Dhoj Rai Agam Singh Bach Raj Nunthala 2 165-1139 67 R 59+570 2960 31 0 31 2929 1 Upland Chahar
117
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Kapil Mani 467 Kharpa 1 165-1139 590 L 59+610 6250 31 0 31 6219 0.5 Pokheral G Daibi Prakop Samitee/ 468 165-1139 473 R 59+740 4578 1068 427 641 3510 14 Kumudini Pokheral 469 Tin Jiit Rai 165-1139 474 L 59+760 1012 222 10 212 790 20.9
470 Haika Singh Rai Bikram Dhoj Dharma Raj 165-1139 202 R/L 59+900 4215 750 300 450 3465 10.7
471 Ratna Dhoj Rai Aas Dhoj Dharma Raj 165-1139 203 R/L 59+940 4030 870 348 522 3160 13
472 162 Kaji Man Tamang 165-1139 490 R/L 60+000 3711 497 199 298 3214 8
Dhan Bahadur 473 165-1139 489 R 60+040 159 150 60 90 9 56.6 Tamang
Prem Chetra 474 250 Nimle Sherpa 165-1139 484 R 60+060 260 95 10 85 165 32.7 Homestead Chahar Sherpa
475 46 Shanti Rai Nayandra 165-1139 486 R 60+070 205 40 10 30 165 14.6 Homestead Sim
Purna Shova 476 184 165-1139 487 R 60+080 140 32 10 22 108 15.7 Dargi 477 Tila Rai Nunthala 2 165-1139 488 R/L 60+050 1921 583 331 252 1338 13.1
478 Kirti Man Rai Aasar Dhoj Shree Dhoj Nunthala 4 165-1139 226 R/L 60+105 1465 600 240 360 865 24.6
Pancha Bahadur 479 Aasar Dhoj Shree Dhoj Nunthala 4 165-1139 227 R/L 60+150 1240 450 180 270 790 21.8 Rai Chandra Kumar 480 Punta Raj Aasar Dhoj Nunthala 4 165-1139 228 R/L 60+180 745 240 96 144 505 19.3 Rai Padam 481 Khadga Raj Rai Nunthala 4 165-1139 229 R 60+200 410 160 70 90 250 22 Bahadur 482 Ram Devi Rai Nunthala 4 165-1139 403 L 60+200 383 160 61 99 223 25.8
483 168 Raj Kumari Rai Purna Bdr Nunthala 4 165-1139 386 R/L 60+250 255 224 80 144 31 56.5 Homestead Chahar
484 Prem Chandra Rai Nunthala 4 165-1140 411 L 60+260 384 72 10 62 312 16.1
485 160 Jaya Kumari Rai Chandra Bdr Nunthala 4 165-1140 392 R 60+265 255 240 105 135 15 52.9 Homestead Chahar
486 Nabin Rai Nunthala 4 165-1140 409 R 60+280 508 220 40 180 288 35.4
487 168 Raj Kumari Rai Nunthala 4 165-1140 401 R 60+280 100 80 30 50 20 50
488 Bishnu Rai Nunthala 4 165-1140 400 R 60+320 100 96 40 56 4 56
118
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
489 158 Babita Tamang Dhan Bdr Nunthala 4 165-1140 420 L 60+320 128 80 30 50 48 39.1 Fallow Chahar
Khem Chandra 490 Nunthala 4 165-1140 421 L 60+285 380 176 70 106 204 27.9 Rai 491 Prem Chandra Rai Nunthala 4 165-1140 410 L 135 112 50 62 23 45.9
Jagat Prasad 492 Ratna Prasad Raghu Nath Nunthala 4 165-1140 3 R 60+335 505 349 160 189 156 37.4 Pokheral 493 Kabi Raj Pokheral Devi Bhakta Laxmi Nath Nunthala 4 165-1140 7 R 30+360 145 96 20 76 49 52.4
Tal Kumari 494 HemLal Koshi Nanda Nunthala 4 165-1140 8 R 60+370 125 108 27 81 17 64.8 Pokheral
495 159 Jai Kumari Rai Ram Kumar Nunthala 4 165-1140 396 175 149 90 59 26 33.7 Upland Chahar
496 Tila Rai Nunthala 4 165-1140 397 381 271 108 163 110 42.8
Durga Devi 497 Shiva Prasad Laxmi Nath Nunthala 4 165-1140 11 L 60+410 145 80 10 70 65 48.3 Pokheral 498 7 Prem Lal Pokheral Parsuram Bijaya Raj Nunthala 4 165-1140 14 R/L 60+450 395 180 72 108 215 27.3
Mani Kanika 499 Bhola Nath Bijaya Raj Nunthala 4 165-1140 15 R/L 60+460 245 135 54 81 110 33.1 Pokheral Koshi Prasad Bishnu 500 Bijaya Raj Nunthala 4 165-1140 16 R/L 60+470 215 135 54 81 80 37.7 Pokheral Shanker Parsu Ram Bhawani 501 Bijaya Raj Nunthala 4 165-1140 17 R 60+485 155 180 72 108 -25 69.7 Pokheral Prasad Koshi Prasad Bishnu 502 Bijaya Raj Nunthala 4 165-1140 18 R 60+490 80 48 10 38 32 47.5 Pokheral Shanker Mani Kanika 503 Bhola Nath Bijaya Raj Nunthala 4 165-1140 19 R 60+500 95 42 10 32 53 33.7 Pokheral 504 7 Prem Lal Pokheral Parsuram Bijaya Raj Nunthala 4 165-1140 20 R 60+510 115 42 10 32 73 27.8
505 Kharpa 1 165-1140 609 L 60+490 1170 79 10 69 1091 5.9
506 43 Kharpa 1 165-1140 697 L 60+520 925 95 10 85 830 9.2
507 Kharpa 1 165-1140 696 L 60+540 385 10 0 10 375 2.6
508 50 Kharpa 1 165-1140 698 L 60+550 115 10 0 10 105 8.7
Katak Bdr. 509 50 Lal Bdr Kharpa 1 165-1140 699 L 60+555 304 10 0 10 294 3.3 Homestead Chahar Tamang 510 Kharpa 1 165-1140 707 L 60+558 376 30 0 30 346 8
511 Kharpa 1 165-1140 708 L 60+560 45 10 0 10 35 22.2
512 Kharpa 1 165-1140 612 L 60+570 995 63 0 63 932 6.3
119
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
513 Kharpa 1 165-1140 726 L 60+590 458 30 0 30 428 6.6
514 Kharpa 1 165-1140 727 L 60+600 458 30 0 30 428 6.6
515 Kharpa 1 165-1140 702 L 60+620 1224 47 0 47 1177 3.8
Tirtha Bdr. 516 51 balram Kharpa 1 165-1140 701 L 60+640 481 20 0 20 461 4.2 Homestead Chahar Tamang 517 Kharpa 1 165-1140 710 L 60+645 605 20 0 20 585 3.3
Devan singh 518 42 Man Kumar Rai Kharpa 1 165-1140 709 L 60+660 605 20 0 20 585 3.3 Homestead Sim rai 519 Kharpa 1 165-1140 671 L 60+670 1399 60 0 60 1339 4.3
Lagan Bdr. 520 44 Nava Barna Rai Kharpa 1 165-1140 679 L 60+700 465 20 0 20 445 4.3 Homestead Chahar Rai
521 152 Jay Bdr. Rai Dil Bdr Kharpa 1 165-1140 703 L 60+710 320 25 0 25 295 7.8 Homestead Chahar
522 Kharpa 1 165-1140 729 L 60+720 172 40 10 30 132 17.4
523 Kharpa 1 165-1140 704 L 60+740 260 20 0 20 240 7.7
524 Dhan Kumari Rai Nunthala 5 165-1100 556 60+760 163 72 20 52 91 31.9
525 Shanti Maya Rai Nunthala 5 165-1100 557 60+670 161 72 20 52 89 32.3
Rudra Bahadur 526 Nunthala 5 165-1100 548 60+790 160 60 15 45 100 28.1 Rai 527 Kul Raj Rai Nunthala 5 165-1100 552 60+800 1395 192 84 108 1203 7.7
528 Brish Bahadur Rai Nunthala 5 165-1100 553 60+820 1390 63 20 43 1327 3.1
529 Nunthala 5 165-1100 663 60+820 2173 275 131 144 1898 6.6
530 Nunthala 5 165-1100 662 60+880 1017 127 30 97 890 9.5
Furba 531 176 Birus Tamang Tamang/Lalit Nunthala 5 165-1100 558 60+970 350 84 10 74 266 21.1 Homestead Sim
Bdr
532 Nunthala 5 165-1100 630 60+980 10840 95 10 85 10745 0.8
Chitra Bahadur 533 183 Saharman Nunthala 5 165-1100 563 61+000 855.5 381 201 180 474.5 21 Upland Chahar Tamang Dhan Maya 534 Nunthala 5 165-1100 561 61+040 252 165 66 99 87 39.3 Tamang Chitra Bahadur 535 183 Saharman Nunthala 5 165-1100 562 61+060 910.5 360 144 216 550.5 23.7 Upland Chahar Tamang
120
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
536 174 Dhak Raj Sherpa Rimal Kumar Nunthala 5 165-1100 559 61+080 947 300 120 180 647 19 Upland Sim
537 Nir Dhan Rai Man Bahadur Haikam Singh Nunthala 5 165-1100 516 61+100 4155 855 342 513 3300 12.3
538 Miitra Dhan Rai Man Bahadur Haikam Singh Nunthala 5 165-1100 518 61+160 4595 975 390 585 3620 12.7
Ratna Hira Ratna 539 Sahar Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 62 61+240 1745 100 10 90 1645 5.2 Tamang Bahadur Ganga Kumari 540 Nunthala 9 165-1100 296 61+220 3024 264 33 231 2760 7.6 Tamang 541 166 Devendra Tamang Nunthala 9 165-1100 295 61+220 300 300 250 50 0 16.7
Nir Ku mar 542 173 Bhim Bdr Nunthala 9 165-1100 210 61+340 941 143 53 90 798 9.6 Upland Chahar Tamang Nir Kumar 543 Nunthala 9 165-1100 211 R 61+360 942 330 132 198 612 21 Tamang 544 Dil Man Singh Nunthala 9 165-1100 212 R 61+390 944 390 156 234 554 24.8
545 Chabi Lal Singh Nunthala 9 165-1100 213 R 61+415 944 330 132 198 614 21
546 172 Birman tamang Bhim Bdr Bulung Nunthala 9 165-1100 214 R 61+440 944 450 180 270 494 28.6 Upland Chahar
Dhan Bahadur 547 Nunthala 9 165-1100 273 R 61+460 159 47 10 37 112 23.3 Tamang Bam Bahadur 548 16 Nunthala 9 165-1100 274 R/L 61+470 5761 463 185 278 5298 4.8 Tamang Guman Singh 549 156 Chyang Buddhi Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 78 L 61+550 505 79 33 46 426 9.1 Upland Tamang Man Bahadur 550 157 Chatur Man Purna Nunthala 9 165-1100 48 R/L 61+560 3470 349 34 315 3121 9.1 Upland Sim Tamang Sundar Lal 551 Garva Jit Sovit Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 46 R 61+630 2020 450 180 270 1570 13.4 Tamang Buddhi Man 552 161 Bal Singh Lok Dorge Nunthala 9 165-1100 49 L 61+560 1780 750 300 450 1030 25.3 Upland Sim Tamang Indra Man 553 Nunthala 9 165-1100 255 L 61+670 452.5 63 20 43 389.5 9.5 Tamang Lalit Bahadur 554 Nunthala 9 165-1100 257 L 61+665 930 450 180 270 480 29 Tamang
555 170 Nirmaya Tamang Dik Bdr Furba Nunthala 9 165-1100 256 R 61+690 452.5 254 119 135 198.5 29.8 Upland Sim
556 Mohan Tamang Lal Bahadur Buddhi Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 43 R 61+720 1915 450 180 270 1465 14.1
Bhim Bahadur 557 Lal Bahadur Buddhi Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 42 R 61+760 5929 420 168 252 5509 4.3 Tamang Buddhi Man 558 161 Bal Singh Lok Dorge Nunthala 9 165-1100 30 L 61+760 3445 318 10 308 3127 8.9 Upland Sim Tamang Sher Bahadur Dhan 559 169 Man Singh Nunthala 9 165-1100 41 R 61+785 925 318 138 180 607 19.5 Upland Sim Tamang Bahadur
121
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Jaman Singh WangduLam 560 Shreeman Nunthala 9 165-1100 34 R 61+840 1580 900 360 540 680 34.2 Tamang a Sun Maya 561 145 Man Bahadur Kaji Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 31 L 61+840 3450 1200 480 720 2250 20.9 Upland Tamang Birkha Bahadur Purna 562 Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 32 L 62+120 1430 375 150 225 1055 15.7 Tamang Bahadur Purna 563 187 Sun Man Tamang ChaturMan Nunthala 9 165-1100 33 L 61+900 270 60 20 40 210 14.8 Upland Sim Bahadur Purna 564 187 Sun Man Tamang Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1101 161 61+950 3465 63 49 14 3402 0.4 Upland Sim Bahadur Chandra Bahadur Purna 565 Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1101 137 R 61+970 1375 302 122 180 1073 13.1 Tamang Bahadur Purna 566 Birkha Bahadur Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1101 135 R 61+970 1645 375 150 225 1270 13.7 Bahadur 567 Saurya Devi Than Nunthala 9 165-1101 134 R 62+060 890 80 50 30 810 3.4
Chandra Bahadur Purna 568 175 Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1101 7 R 62+065 6335 750 300 450 5585 7.1 Upland Sim Tamang Bahadur Chandra Maya 569 176 Lalit Bahadur Phurba Nunthala 9 165-1100 19 R 62+200 2790 960 402 558 1830 20 Homestead Chahar Tamang Sher Bahadur Dhan 570 169 Man Singh Nunthala 9 165-1100 22 R/L 62+300 3655 902 379 523 2753 14.3 Tamang Bahadur Purna Maya 571 127 Man Bahadur Serbe Nunthala 9 165-1100 20 L 62+240 735 400 193 207 335 28.2 Homestead Sim Tamang Purna Maya 572 127 Man Bahadur Serbe Nunthala 9 165-1100 21 L 62+280 785 63 20 43 722 5.5 Upland Sim Tamang Bhim Bahadur 573 Lal Bahadur Buddhi Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 23 R 62+320 785 240 33 207 545 26.4 Tamang Sunda Lal 574 Garva Jit Sovit Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 26 R/L 62+320 485 383 153 230 102 47.4 Tamang Samar Bahadur 575 Mangal Kitab Singh Nunthala 9 165-1100 27 L 62+340 2150 48 10 38 2102 1.8 Tamang chuda bahdur 576 254 Nunthala 9 165-1100 270 L 62+380 342 143 80 63 199 18.4 karki
577 164 Gopi Bdr. Tamang Mohan Lal.Bdr Nunthala 9 165-1100 268 R/L 62+400 344 280 80 200 64 58.1 Upland Sim
578 165 Sabitra Tamang Nahakul Mohan Nunthala 9 165-1100 269 R 62+420 344 40 10 30 304 8.7 Upland Sim
Chandra Bahadur Purna 579 175 Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 18 L 62+420 1750 206 26 180 1544 10.3 Homestead Sim Tamang Bahadur Krishna Maya 580 Nunthala 9 165-1100 206 R 62+420 45 30 0 30 15 66.7 Tamang Jit Bahadur Maul 581 Garbu Nunthala 9 165-1100 17 L 62+450 785 20 0 20 765 2.5 Tamang Bahadur Krishna Maya 582 163 Garva Jit Sovit Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 24 R 62+430 305 160 90 70 145 23 Homestead Sim Tamang Bhim Bahadur 583 171 Garbu Man Singh Nunthala 9 165-1100 15 L 62+455 945 30 0 30 915 3.2 Homestead Sim Tamang
122
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
584 Bhir Nunthala 9 165-1100 8 R 62+560 665 127 73 54 538 8.1
585 181 Kale Tamang Mangal Singh Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 11 L 62+490 1245 38 10 28 1207 2.2 Homestead Chahar
Birkha Bahadur Purna 586 Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 12 L 62+475 70 20 10 10 50 14.3 Tamang Bahadur 587 Nunthala Chautari Nunthala 9 165-1100 13 L 62+470 95 31 10 21 64 22.1
Bangdorje 588 150 Khadga Bdr. Lama Shreeman Nunthala 9 165-1100 220 L 62+500 1478 35 10 25 1443 1.7 Homestead Sim Lama Shanti Devi Run Bdr 589 149 Man Bdr Nunthala 9 165-1100 219 L 62+510 382 25 10 15 357 3.9 Homestead Sim tamang Tamang Harka Bdr /Yani Jamana 590 182 Bang Dorje Nunthala 9 165-1100 240 R/L 62+520 80 25 0 25 55 31.3 Homestead Sim Maya Tamang Singh Purna 591 187 Sun Man Tamang Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 2 R/L 62+560 575 336 228 108 239 18.8 Upland Sim Bahadur Harkha Bahadur 592 Nunthala 9 165-1100 239 L 62+530 508 31 10 21 477 4.1 Tamang 593 181 Kale Tamang Mangal Singh Chatur Man Nunthala 9 165-1100 3 R 62+565 325 111 25 86 214 26.5
594 154 Karma Tamang Jaman Singh wangdorje Nunthala 9 165-1100 238 L 62+580 508 120 30 90 388 17.7 Upland Sim
Mani Maya 595 Nunthala 9 165-1100 237 L 62+600 430 132 32 100 298 23.3 Tamang Purna 596 187 SunMan Tamang Chatur Man Kharpa 1 165-1100 639 L 62+630 2420 381 84 297 2039 12.3 Upland Chahar Bahadur Chandra Bdr. 597 175 Chatur man Purna Nunthala 9 165-1100 277 R 62+660 2610 160 20 140 2450 5.4 Upland Chahar Tamang 598 Menuka Rai Nunthala 9 165-1100 275 R 62+700 650 31 10 21 619 3.2
Chandra Bdr. 599 175 Chatur man Purna Nunthala 9 165-1101 276 R 62+760 1400 180 45 135 1220 9.6 Upland Chahar Tamang Laghu Dhan 600 232 Ganja Man Sajan Singh Nunthala 9 165-1101 109 R 62+780 605 114 14 100 491 16.5 Upland Tamang Chandra Bahadur Purna 601 175 Chatur Man Kharpa 1 165-1101 643 L 62+780 4780 40 10 30 4740 0.6 Tamang Bahadur Mitra Maya 602 256 Laghu Dhan GanjaMan Nunthala 9 165-1101 110 R 62+820 425 206 116 90 219 21.2 Homestead Sim Tamang Chandra 603 147 Nepali Tamang GanjaMan Nunthala 9 165-1101 111 R 62+840 2565 750 300 450 1815 17.5 Homestead Sim Bahadur Suvasi Devi Chakra 604 Dhan Bahadur Nunthala 9 165-1101 108 L 62+840 555 50 10 40 505 7.2 Tamang Bahadur Som Maya Haikam 605 GanjaMan Nunthala 9 165-1101 112 R 62+900 3065 360 144 216 2705 7 Tamang Singh Hansa Bahadur Krishna 606 GanjaMan Nunthala 9 165-1101 113 R 62+920 835 390 156 234 445 28 Tamang Bahadur Hira Maya 607 47 Nunthala 9 165-1101 288 R 62+940 1655 300 120 180 1355 10.9 Tamang
123
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
608 232 Laxman Tamang Ganja Man Sajane Nunthala 9 165-1101 278 L 62+940 9710 90 0 90 9620 0.9
Jeet Bdrr Bangdu 609 151 Kalpana Lama Nunthala 9 165-1101 287 R 62+980 325 180 99 81 145 24.9 Homestead Chahar tamang tamang Khadga Bahadur Wangdu 610 150 Shree Man Nunthala 9 165-1101 115 R 63+000 2470 420 168 252 2050 10.2 Homestead Chahar Tamang Lama Krishna Bahadur Khadga 611 Wangdu Nunthala 9 165-1101 120 R 63+260 3165 30 0 30 3135 0.9 Tamang Bahadur Phurba Dorji Pasang 612 204 Nunthala 8 165-1102 281 L 64+750 509 56 10 46 453 9 Upland Sherpa Dawa Pasang 613 153 Dafuri Sherpa Nunthala 8 165-1102 269 L 64+760 143 30 10 20 113 14 Homestead Chahar Temwa 614 Karma Sherpa Nunthala 8 165-1102 277 R/L 143 40 20 20 103 14
Pasang 615 177 Pema Sherpa Temwa Nunthala 8 165-1102 247 R/L 64+770 158 60 24 36 98 22.8 Homestead Chahar
Sherpa
616 Rabina Rai Nunthala 8 165-1102 285 R/L 64+780 126 15 0 15 111 11.9
Pasang 617 153 Dafuri Sherpa Nunthala 8 165-1102 286 R/L 64+790 2650 840 336 504 1810 19 Upland Chahar Temwa Pasang Temba 618 Nunthala 8 165-1102 293 L 64+840 1351.26 222 89 133 1129.26 9.8 Sherpa Deu Kumar 619 148 Bir Bdr Nunthala 8 165-1102 291 L 64+850 280 57 10 47 223 16.8 Upland Tamang Wang Nidoma 620 Nunthala 8 165-1102 267 L 64+870 508.74 21 0 21 487.74 4.1 Sherpa Pasang 621 177 Pema Sherpa Temwa Nunthala 8 165-1102 284 R 64+830 802 40 10 30 762 3.7 Upland Chahar
Sherpa Pasang Nuri 622 155 Kandok Cheti Nunthala 8 165-1102 147 R 64+860 17605 975 330 645 16630 3.7 Upland Chahar Sherpa Pasang Geli 623 178 Jangu Tem Suli Nunthala 8 165-1102 149 R 64+930 2735 102 20 82 2633 3 Upland Chahar Sherpa 624 146 Galje Sherpa Tema Gelu Jangbu Nunthala 8 165-1102 148 R/L 64+880 9960 1275 510 765 8685 7.7
Pasang Dawa 625 188 Nuri Shrepa Diktel 6 165-1102 1401 L 65+020 3059 870 348 522 2189 17.1 Upland Chahar Sherpa
626 188 Pem Diku Sherpa Nuri Temba Diktel 6 165-1102 822 R 65+020 1645 140 40 100 1505 6.1 Upland Chahar
Pahal Bahadur 627 189 Krishna Bir Ganju Man Diktel 6 165-1102 823 R 65+160 7340 90 0 90 7250 1.2 Upland Chahar Tamang
628 188 Nim Dikki Sherpa Nuri Shrepa Diktel 6 165-1102 1402 L 65+080 1876 420 315 105 1456 5.6 Upland Chahar
Gajendra Kumar 629 198 Diktel 6 165-1102 1563 L 65+170 5001 320 128 192 4681 3.8 Thapa Bhim Bahadur 630 Diktel 6 165-1102 1561 L 65+180 509 100 35 65 409 12.8 Khatri
124
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Rajendra Kumar 631 Diktel 6 165-1102 1562 L 65+200 1550 168 60 108 1382 7 Thapa Amrit 632 Buddhi Raj Thapa Prem Bahadur Diktel 6 165-1102 851 R 65+210 1175 667 260 407 508 34.6 Bahadur Amrit 633 Buddhi Raj Thapa Prem Bahadur Diktel 6 165-1102 816 L 65+220 465 31 10 21 434 4.5 Bahadur Krishna 634 Pabitra Thapa Tilak Diktel 6 165-1102 817 L 65+260 285 62 10 52 223 18.2 Bahadur Krishna 635 Pabitra Thapa Tilak Diktel 6 165-1102 852 L 65+260 1310 222 78 144 1088 11 Bahadur Ratna Bahadur 636 223 Waktuwar Gopal Diktel 6 165-1102 819 L 65+320 1920 990 396 594 930 30.9 Thapa Gajendra Kumar Bhim 637 198 Waktuwar Diktel 6 165-1102 820 L 65+400 2690 600 240 360 2090 13.4 Upland Chahar Thapa Bahadur
638 208 Sandeep Rai Lalit Bdr. Diktel 6 165-1102 1593 R 65+420 300 21 0 21 279 7 Homestead Chahar
639 195 Kamala Thapa Diktel 6 165-1102 1594 R/L 65+460 6535 72 10 62 6463 0.9
Durga Bahadur 640 Jaman Singh Main Singh Diktel 6 165-1102 658 R/L 65+420 14405 3300 1320 1980 11105 13.7 Bhujel Gajendra Bahadur Bhim 641 198 Waktuwar Diktel 6 165-1102 660 L 65+590 4245 540 215 325 3705 7.7 Upland Chahar Thapa Bahadur Gajendra Bahadur Bhim 642 198 Waktuwar Diktel 6 165-1103 667 R 65+620 3145 594 297 297 2551 9.4 Upland Chahar Thapa Bahadur Khagendra Bhim 643 197 Waktuwar Diktel 6 165-1103 661 L 65+680 3140 336 252 84 2804 2.7 Fallow Chahar Bahadur Thapa Bahadur Khagendra Bhim 644 197 Waktuwar Diktel 6 165-1103 666 R 65+685 4985 390 120 270 4595 5.4 Upland Chahar Bahadur Thapa Bahadur Chandra Bahadur 645 Bal Bahadur Dil Gambhir Diktel 6 165-1103 633 L 65+740 505 420 105 315 85 62.4 Khatri Suman Kumar Bhakta 646 194 Tilak Bahadur Diktel 6 165-1103 665 R 65+740 5655 364 234 130 5291 2.3 Upland Chahar Thapa Bahadur Suman Kumar Bhakta 647 194 Tilak Bahadur Diktel 6 165-1103 664 R/L 65+780 3215 930 372 558 2285 17.4 Upland Chahar Thapa Bahadur Tej Narayan 648 Diktel 6 165-1103 1173 L 65+860 571 127 37 90 444 15.8 Sainju Tej Narayan 649 Diktel 6 165-1103 1174 R 65+860 350 104 10 94 246 26.9 Sainju 650 Sunita Sainju Diktel 6 165-1103 1175 L 65+880 505 70 10 60 435 11.9
651 Sunita Sainju Diktel 6 165-1103 1176 R 65+880 280 84 21 63 196 22.5
Rabindra Kumar 652 Diktel 6 165-1103 1177 L 65+890 516 15 0 15 501 2.9 Sainju Rabindra Kumar 653 Diktel 6 165-1103 1178 R 65+890 258 80 35 45 178 17.4 Sainju Shyam Kumar 654 27 Chakra Bdr. Diktel 6 165-1103 1179 L 65+900 515 20 0 20 495 3.9 Upland Sim Sainju
125
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Shyam Kumar 655 27 Chakra Bdr. Diktel 6 165-1103 1180 R 65+900 260 100 55 45 160 17.3 Upland Sim Sainju 656 Nur Kaji Sainju Diktel 6 165-1103 1181 L 65+910 540 15 0 15 525 2.8
657 Nur Kaji Sainju Diktel 6 165-1103 1182 R 65+910 235 80 35 45 155 19.1
Jay Prasad 658 Diktel 6 165-1103 1183 L 65+920 573 40 10 30 533 5.2 Acharya Jay Prasad 659 Diktel 6 165-1103 1184 R 65+920 190 40 10 30 150 15.8 Acharya 660 Biswo Bandu Ojha Diktel 6 165-1103 1185 L 65+935 604 80 35 45 524 7.5
661 Biswo Bandu Ojha Diktel 6 165-1103 1186 R 65+935 160 15 0 15 145 9.4
Gopi Krishna 662 26 Amrit Bdr. Diktel 6 165-1103 1187 L 65+945 633 40 10 30 593 4.7 Upland Sim Udas Gopi Krishna 663 26 Amrit Bdr. Singha Raj Diktel 6 165-1103 1188 R 65+945 136 40 10 30 96 22.1 Upland Sim Udas Prakash 664 Diktel 6 165-1103 1189 L 65+960 618 20 0 20 598 3.2 Rajbhandari Prakash 665 Diktel 6 165-1103 1190 R 65+960 152 80 35 45 72 29.6 Rajbhandari Pradeep 666 Diktel 6 165-1103 1192 R 65+970 581 150 60 90 431 15.5 Rajbhandari 667 Jawar Lamsal Bhola Diktel 6 165-1103 758 R/L 65+980 6215 1500 600 900 4715 14.5
Bhakt aBir 668 Timsina/Gita Diktel 6 165-1103 757 R 66+000 4655 350 140 210 4305 4.5
Timsina
669 Ramesh Thapa Man Bahadur Lalit Bahadur Diktel 6 165-1103 792 R/L 66+220 3985 360 114 246 3625 6.2
670 Ramesh Thapa Man Bahadur Lalit Bahadur Diktel 6 165-1103 793 R/L 66+260 5030 270 108 162 4760 3.2
Furi/Landuri/Pemb Daputar+Dag Jigu Dorje + 671 207 Diktel 6 165-1103 10 R/L 66+940 9460 1650 660 990 7810 10.5 Fallow Chahar a Sherpa elu Laputar Karma Sherpa
Furi/Landuri/Pemb Daputar+Dag Jigu Dorje + 672 207 Diktel 6 165-1143 20 R/L 67+100 22180 2310 924 1386 19870 6.2 Fallow Chahar a Sherpa elu Laputar Karma Sherpa
673 Landuri Sherpa Dagul Karma Tonu Diktel 6 165-1143 21 R/L 67+240 5585 840 336 504 4745 9
674 200 Pemba Sherpa Laputtar Karma Tonu Diktel 6 165-1143 22 R/L 67+280 3240 600 240 360 2640 11.1 Upland Chahar
675 205 Pema Nuri Sherpa Daptur Jigu dorje Diktel 6 165-1143 1372 R/L 67+320 1160 255 102 153 905 13.2 Fallow Chahar
676 217 Dafuri Sherpa Diktel 6 165-1143 1373 R/L 67+340 1113 255 102 153 858 13.7
126
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
677 207 Furi Sherpa Diktel 6 165-1143 1374 R/L 67+350 1113 300 120 180 813 16.2
Daputar+Dag Jigu Dorje + 678 207 Furi Sherpa Diktel 6 165-1143 1375 R/L 67+370 1114 255 102 153 859 13.7 Upland Chahar elu Laputar Karma Sherpa
Furi/Landuri/Pemb Daputar+Dag Jigu Dorje + 679 207 Diktel 6 165-1143 24 R/L 67+390 19820 600 240 360 19220 1.8 Upland Chahar a Sherpa elu Laputar Karma Sherpa
Furi/Landuri/Pemb Daputar+Dag Jigu Dorje + 680 207 Diktel 6 165-1143 25 R/L 67+430 16335 3750 1500 2250 12585 13.8 Fallow Chahar a Sherpa elu Laputar Karma Sherpa
681 200 Pemba Sherpa Laputar Karma Diktel 6 165-1143 6 R 67+680 2290 840 570 270 1450 11.8 Upland Chahar
682 Dabtare Sherpa Diktel 6 165-1143 1376 L 67+720 120 72 10 62 48 51.7
Daputar+Dag Jigu Dorje + 683 207 Furi Sherpa Diktel 6 165-1143 1379 L 67+735 102 40 10 30 62 29.4 Homestead Chahar elu Laputar Karma Sherpa
684 Dabtare Sherpa Diktel 6 165-1143 1377 L 67+760 445 170 20 150 275 33.7
685 Chatra Man Rai Bamrang 7 165-1143 418 R/L 67+780 10810 990 396 594 9820 5.5
686 243 jas Bdr. Tamang Sukra Bdr. Man Bdr. Bamrang 7 165-1143 635 R/L 67+840 10200 900 360 540 9300 5.3 Upland Chahar
Bansa Bdr. 687 28 Bimala Katuwal Munam singh Bamrang 7 165-1143 637 L 67+840 509 143 71 72 366 14.1 Fallow Chahar Katuwal
688 244 Bichari Tamang Sukra Bdr. Man Bdr. Bamrang 7 165-1143 638 R/L 10200 780 312 468 9420 4.6 Upland Sim
689 244 Bichari Tamang Sukra Bdr. Man Bdr. Bamrang 7 165-1143 639 L 3981 990 396 594 2991 14.9 Upland Sim
690 Bamrang 7 165-1143 649 L 255 31 10 21 224 8.2
691 243 jas Bdr. Tamang Sukra Bdr. Man Bdr. Bamrang 7 165-1143 650 L 3075 127 20 107 2948 3.5 Upland Chahar
692 199 Bhim Bdr Thapa Man Bdr Man Singh Bamrang 7 165-1143 165 R/L 67+920 11420 1050 420 630 10370 5.5 Upland Chahar
Bir+Karna+Dhan 693 206 Buddiman Dhanjit Bamrang 7 165-1143 174 R/L 68+200 20885 1170 468 702 19715 3.4 Fallow Chahar Bdr Tamang 694 Bamrang 7 165-1143 175 R/L 68+360 35975 2150 1260 890 33825 2.5
695 Bamrang 7 165-1143 2 R/L 68+460 8595 796 318 478 7799 5.6
696 Bamrang 7 165-1143 176 R 68+470 155 127 64 63 28 40.6
697 Bamrang 7 165-1183 1 R/L 68+480 19240 3250 1314 1936 15990 10.1
127
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Buddimaya Kush Bdr. Bakhbir 698 203 Bamrang 7 165-1183 8 L 68+740 2455 99 0 99 2356 4 Upland Chahar Tamang Tamang Tamang
699 Bamrang 7 165-1183 22 R 69+050 15585 112 40 72 15473 0.5
700 237 Bamrang 7 165-1183 10 R 68+740 23605 1650 660 990 21955 4.2
701 Bamrang 7 165-1183 19 R/L 68+860 17395 2850 1140 1710 14545 9.8
702 235 Liala b. Tamang ram b Dhanman Bamrang 7 165-1183 642 L 69+050 5140 302 120 182 4838 3.5 Upland Chahar
703 242 Bamrang 7 165-1183 619 R 300 20 0 20 280 6.7
Buddimaya Kush Bdr. Bakhbir 704 203 Bamrang 7 165-1183 620 R/L 120 60 20 40 60 33.3 Upland Chahar Tamang Tamang Tamang
Prem chandra Hark Ba. 705 238 Nar B thapa Bamrang 7 165-1183 622 R/L 1014 450 180 270 564 26.6 Upland Chahar Thapa Thapa 706 212 Bamrang 7 165-1183 623 R/L 209 209 108 101 0 48.3
707 207 Kalpana Khadka Bamrang 7 165-1183 624 R/L 420 360 144 216 60 51.4 Homestead Chahar
708 Bamrang 7 165-1183 625 R/L 895 80 30 50 815 5.6
Kushe Bahadur Kush Bdr. Bakhbir 709 203 Diktel 6 165-1183 108 R/L 69+200 3435 1950 78 1872 1485 54.5 Upland Chahar Tamang Tamang Tamang
Man Bahadur Bakhat 710 201 Jahan Singh Diktel 6 165-1183 109 R 69+200 3960 386 154 232 3574 5.9 Upland Chahar Tamang Bahadur Amrit Bahadur Bakhat 711 202 Jahan Singh Diktel 6 165-1183 107 L 69+280 2900 31 0 31 2869 1.1 Tamang Bahadur 712 Jawahar Lamsal Bhola Diktel 6 165-1183 136 R/L 69+360 3660 570 216 354 3090 9.7
Garja Bahadur 713 Dhana Pati Man Bir Diktel 6 165-1183 135 69+380 413 30 10 20 383 4.8 Tamang Punya Bahadur Ambar Pahal 714 Diktel 6 165-1183 141 R/L 69+390 855 270 108 162 585 18.9 Thapa Bahadur Bahadur Prem Bahadur 715 Prakash Dhoj Rana Dhoj Diktel 6 165-1183 138 R 69+450 4550 25 0 25 4525 0.5 Thapa 716 Bhumi Raj Rai Diktel 6 165-1183 1403 L 69+450 254.5 10 0 10 244.5 3.9
Khadga Bahadur 717 Diktel 6 165-1183 1404 L 69+450 254.5 35 10 25 219.5 9.8 Rai Govinda 718 222 Hira Joshi Bisnu Prasad Diktel 6 165-1183 1083 R/L 69+460 509 143 57 86 366 16.9 Chahar Joshi Kashi 719 Nath/Govinda Diktel 6 165-1183 1084 R/L 69+470 663 350 120 230 313 34.7
Prasad Acharya
128
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Krishna Kumari 720 Diktel 6 165-1183 1085 R/L 69+490 731 300 120 180 431 24.6 Shrestha Krishna Kumari 721 Diktel 6 165-1183 1086 R/L 69+510 509 95 38 57 414 11.2 Khatri
Punya Bdr. 722 210 Gita Thapa SwarDhoj Diktel 6 165-1183 1545 R/L 2579 510 204 306 2069 11.9 Upland Chahar Thapa
Som Bahadur 723 Diktel 6 165-1183 1303 R 25606 31 10 21 25575 0.1 Thapa Harka Bahadur Sambar Pahelu 724 Diktel 6 165-1183 144 R/L 381 270 108 162 111 42.5 Tahapa Bahadur Bahadur 725 Guna Raj Tamang Diktel 6 165-1183 1537 R/L 69+580 509 240 96 144 269 28.3
726 Dawa Sherpa Diktel 6 165-1183 1354 R 69+600 3206 1236 449 787 1970 24.5
Rachana Poudel 727 Diktel 6 165-1183 1566 R 520 142 30 112 378 21.5 Basnet Anar Bahadur Pahal Bdr 728 213 Samar Bdr Diktel 6 165-1183 1574 R 4016 63 10 53 3953 1.3 Upland Thapa Thapa
729 193 Mana Bikram Rai Gajurman Shivraj Diktel 6 165-1183 1567 R 158 20 0 20 138 12.7 Upland Chahar
Bisirjana Basnet 730 Diktel 6 165-1183 1577 R 505 78 10 68 427 13.5 Uprety Anar Bahadur Pahal Bdr 731 213 Samar Bdr Diktel 6 165-1183 1578 R/L 2379 750 300 450 1629 18.9 Upland Thapa Thapa Anar Bahadur Pahal Bdr 732 213 Samar Bdr Diktel 6 165-1183 1574 R/L 4016 810 324 486 3206 12.1 Upland Thapa Thapa Umesh Kumar 733 209 Surendra Raj Bhagat Dhoj Diktel 6 165-1183 1277 R/L 69+980 2427 930 360 570 1497 23.5 Homestead Chahar Thapa Som Kumar 734 Diktel 6 165-1183 1304 L 70+020 3562 127 15 112 3435 3.1 Thapa Surendra Raj 735 314 Magan Dhoj Pahal Bdr Diktel 6 165-1183 1305 70+040 2038 390 156 234 1648 11.5 Upland Chahar Thapa Raj Kumar 736 Diktel 6 165-1183 1055 70+060 509 286 110 176 223 34.6 Tamang Kedar Bahadur 737 Diktel 6 165-1183 1251 70+100 771 570 228 342 201 44.4 Thapa 738 Dilli Ram Adhikari Diktel 6 165-1183 1125 70+110 509 101 10 91 408 17.9
Tilak Bahadur 739 Diktel 6 165-1183 1049 70+140 509 300 120 180 209 35.4 Bhujel 740 Phurba Sherpa Diktel 6 165-1183 1080 70+150 222 95 50 45 127 20.3
741 207 Furi Sherpa Diktel 6 165-1183 1081 70+160 287 31 10 21 256 7.3
Kedar Bahadur 742 Diktel 6 165-1183 1452 R/L 70+170 2096 413 188 225 1683 10.7 Thapa
129
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Suresh Kumar 743 Diktel 6 165-1183 1215 1143 480 192 288 663 25.2 Thapa Gyan Bahadur 744 249 Lekh Bdr Prem Bdr Diktel 6 165-1183 1351 70+240 5280 1050 420 630 4230 11.9 Fallow Chahar Thapa Gyan Bahadur 745 249 Lekh Bdr Prem Bdr Diktel 6 165-1183 1348 70+300 2045 450 180 270 1595 13.2 Fallow Chahar Thapa Bhim Bahadur 746 Ritthe Kundal Singh Diktel 6 165-1183 117 70+400 13825 1740 696 1044 12085 7.6 Tamang Shre 747 252 Babita Rai Shiva Kumar Bamrang 7 165-1183 674 529 20 0 20 509 3.8 Upland Chahar Bhahadur 748 191 Sharmila Rai Bamrang 7 165-1183 675 509 30 10 20 479 3.9
749 190 Shyam Laxmi Rai Bamrang 7 165-1183 677 2037 240 135 105 1797 5.2
750 192 Manoj Thapa Bamrang 7 165-1183 676 370 63 27 36 307 9.7
Hari Kumar Rek Bdr. 751 241 Thapa/ Hari Bamrang 7 165-1183 667 70+500 3013 364 234 130 2649 4.3 Upland Chahar Thapa Kumar Thapa Sher Dilli Bahadur 752 Bahadur Nara Bahadur Bamrang 7 165-1183 120 70+540 1315 180 72 108 1135 8.2 Thapa Thapa Khadga Bahadur 753 Til Bikram Anar Bahadur Bamrang 7 165-1183 121 70+560 1910 510 81 429 1400 22.5 Thapa Kul Bahadur 754 Man Bahadur Nar Bahadur Bamrang 7 165-1183 122 70+600 1190 510 204 306 680 25.7 Thapa Bal Bahadur 755 247 Khadga Bdr Jagdhan Bamrang 7 165-1183 581 70+630 1177 570 228 342 607 29.1 Upland Chahar Pandey Ganesh Bahadur 756 245 Bir Bdr. Dal Bdr. Bamrang 7 165-1183 488 70+700 2555 1050 420 630 1505 24.7 Homestead Chahar Thapa Kaji Bahadur 757 225 Bir B. Dal Bamrang 7 165-1183 489 70+760 3555 225 90 135 3330 3.8 Upland Thapa 758 Menuka Rai Bamrang 7 165-1183 583 70+780 255 63 18 45 192 17.6
Dhyan Bahadur 759 Bamrang 7 165-1183 584 70+800 712 10 0 10 702 1.4 Rai Hari Kumar 760 241 Thapa/Shanker Bamrang 7 165-1183 585 70+840 940 429 267 162 511 17.2
Bahadur Thapa Hari Kumar Rek Bdr. 761 241 Thapa/Shanker Bamrang 7 165-1183 587 70+880 255 108 63 45 147 17.6 Upland Chahar Thapa Bahadur Thapa Hari Kumar Rek Bdr. 762 241 Thapa/Shanker Bamrang 7 165-1183 586 70+880 11678 1053 421 632 10625 5.4 Upland Chahar Thapa Bahadur Thapa Ganesh Bahadur 763 245 Bir Bdr. Dal Bdr. Bamrang 7 165-1183 491 71+000 1399 780 300 480 619 34.3 Upland Chahar Thapa
130
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Kaji Bahadur 764 225 Bir B. Dal Bamrang 7 165-1183 490 71+160 1399 750 300 450 649 32.2 Upland Thapa 765 Sita Basnet Bamrang 7 165-1183 672 255 31 0 31 224 12.2
766 Ram Kaji Thapa Bamrang 7 165-1183 673 2230 1169 467 702 1061 31.5
Tankanath 767 231 Roshna Thapa Chabilal Bamrang 7 165-1183 571 77 77 25 52 0 67.5 Homestead Chahar Pandey Gita Kumari 768 229 Bamrang 7 165-1183 575 122 122 48 74 0 60.7 Basnet Tankanath 769 231 Roshna Thapa Chabilal Bamrang 7 165-1183 576 53 53 20 33 0 62.3 Homestead Chahar Pandey
Lila Bahadur Lila Bdr/Prem 770 230 Prem Bdr Bamrang 7 165-1183 535 156 47 16 31 109 19.9 Upland Chahar Khatri Bdr
Palak Bahadur Nar Bdr. 771 29 Man Dhoj Bamrang 7 165-1183 536 254.37 75 30 45 179.37 17.7 Upland Chahar Khatri Khatri Shiva Bahadur 772 241 Bamrang 7 165-1183 629 253 75 30 45 178 17.8 Thapa Chal Kumari Ram Bdr. `Run Bdr. 773 246 Bamrang 7 165-1183 628 509 210 84 126 299 24.8 Upland Sim Pandey Pandey Pandey Dhyan Bahadur 774 33 Bamrang 7 165-1183 588 52 20 0 20 32 38.5 Rai Shiva Bahadur 775 241 Bamrang 7 165-1183 541 280 31 10 21 249 7.5 Thapa 776 Sita Thapa Bamrang 7 165-1183 407 71+660 6955 1750 700 1050 5205 15.1
777 Tulsi Maya Thapa Bamrang 7 165-1183 406 71+380 1190 600 330 270 590 22.7
Lal Bahadur 778 Bamrang 7 165-1183 409 71+400 2800 700 250 450 2100 16.1 Thapa/ Sita Thapa 779 Tulsi Maya Thapa Bamrang 7 165-1183 408 71+450 440 10 0 10 430 2.3
780 Yubraj Thapa Bamrang 7 165-1183 604 1760 750 300 450 1010 25.6
781 197 Khagendra Thapa Bamrang 7 165-1183 605 2150 420 168 252 1730 11.7
Lila Bdr/Prem 782 230 Sita Kumari Khatri Prem Bdr Bamrang 7 165-1183 668 365 128 56 72 237 19.7 Upland Sim Bdr
p. Gyan 783 233 Gyani Thapa Hark B. Thapa Bamrang 7 165-1183 669 6327 1430 575 855 4897 13.5 Upland Chahar Thapa Lal Bahadur 784 Bamrang 7 165-1183 407 6955 1140 456 684 5815 9.8 Thapa/Sita Thapa Lal Bahadur 785 Bamrang 7 165-1183 405 1205 180 72 108 1025 9 Thapa/Sita Thapa Lal Bahadur 786 Janga Bir Amrit Bamrang 7 165-1183 88 71+740 2130 870 350 520 1260 24.4 Thapa
131
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Lal Bahadur 787 Janga Bir Amrit Bamrang 7 165-1183 86 71+780 5470 140 40 100 5330 1.8 Thapa Lal Bahadur 788 Janga Bir Amrit Bamrang 7 165-1183 87 71+740 555 250 25 225 305 40.5 Thapa 789 Khadge Dargi Bal Bahadur Aiman Bamrang 7 165-1183 244 1780 63 10 53 1717 3
Prasad Singh 790 234 Loke Jal Bir Bamrang 7 165-1183 143 71+830 3935 120 20 100 3815 2.5 Upland Chahar Kami Jagat Bahadur 791 Lal Bahadur Janga Bir Bamrang 7 165-1183 142 71+900 1710 604 110 494 1106 28.9 Thapa Pahal Bahadur 792 Dal Bahadur Rana Bhum Bamrang 7 165-1183 144 72+000 3725 360 90 270 3365 7.2 Thapa Jagat Bahadur 793 Lal Bahadur Janga Bir Bamrang 7 165-1183 140 72+040 1850 63 10 53 1787 2.9 Thapa Chitra Bahadur 794 Bamrang 7 165-1183 419 72+100 3310 1050 420 630 2260 19 Tamang Nar Bahadur 795 Bamrang 7 165-1183 420 72+100 3870 993 397 596 2877 15.4 Thapa Jhanka Bahadur 796 Bamrang 7 165-1183 421 72+300 3815 206 60 146 3609 3.8 Thapa Jhanka Bahadur 797 Bamrang 7 165-1183 425 72+300 955 206 80 126 749 13.2 Thapa Uddab Bahadur 798 Bamrang 7 165-1183 426 72+300 955 390 156 234 565 24.5 Thapa Jhanka Bahadur Thapa/Man 799 Bamrang 7 165-1183 154 72+350 4455 600 240 360 3855 8.1 Bahadur/Chitra Bahadur
800 Bamrang 7 165-1183 458 72+370 975 75 30 45 900 4.6
801 Bamrang 7 165-1183 457 72+375 600 600 300 300 0 50
Rudra Bahadur 802 Thapa/ Muga Diktel 6 165-1183 305 72+380 275 10 0 10 265 3.6
Dhan / Buddhi Raj Khagendra Kumar Bhim 803 197 Baktubar Diktel 6 165-1183 306 72+385 240 20 0 20 220 8.3 Fallow Chahar Thapa Bahadur Bhakta Bahadur 804 194 Tilak Baktubar Diktel 6 165-1183 307 72+390 130 16 0 16 114 12.3 Upland Chahar Thapa Tika Bahadur Ratna 805 223 Baktubar Diktel 6 165-1183 308 72+395 95 10 0 10 85 10.5 Homestead Chahar Thapa Bahadur Indra Bahadur Ratna 806 323 Baktubar Diktel 6 165-1183 309 72+400 125 16 0 16 109 12.8 Homestead Chahar Thapa Bahadur Jhanak Bahadur Pahal 807 211 Magan Dhoj Diktel 6 165-1183 310 72+410 85 20 0 20 65 23.5 Homestead Chahar Thapa Bahadur Harka Bahadur Samar Pahal 808 196 Diktel 6 165-1183 311 72+415 75 10 0 10 65 13.3 Homestead Chahar Thapa Bahadur Bahadur
132
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Sher Bahadur Samar Pahal 809 Diktel 6 165-1183 312 72+420 55 10 0 10 45 18.2 Tamang Bahadur Bahadur Jhanak Bahadur Pahal 810 211 Magan Dhoj Diktel 6 165-1183 313 72+425 35 10 0 10 25 28.6 Homestead Chahar Thapa Bahadur Umesh Kumar 811 209 Surendra Raj Magan Dhoj Diktel 6 165-1183 314 72+430 35 10 0 10 25 28.6 Thapa 812 Sanu Kaji Thapa Dal Bahadur Magan Dhoj Diktel 6 165-1183 315 72+435 25 10 0 10 15 40
Kaji Bahadur 813 Bamrang 6 165-1183 1268 72+450 575 45 10 35 530 6.1 Khami GangaBahadur 814 236 Diktel 6 165-1183 991 72+450 95 10 0 10 85 10.5 Khatri 815 Bamrang 7 165-1183 459 72+500 132 132 30 102 0 77.3
816 Bamrang 7 165-1183 460 72+520 132 132 40 92 0 69.7
Nar Bahadur 817 Jit Bahadur Makar Dhoj Bamrang 7 165-1183 155 72+580 2040 1350 540 810 690 39.7 Thapa Nar Bahadur 818 Jit Bahadur Makar Dhoj Bamrang 7 165-1183 157 72+580 1105 200 25 175 905 15.8 Thapa Amrit Kumari 819 Thapa/Nar Kumari Bamrang 7 165-1223 369 1565 240 70 170 1325 10.9
Thapa Mohan Bahadur/Man Bahadur/Amar 820 Bamrang 7 165-1223 395 615 222 70 152 393 24.7 Bahadur/Nar Bahadur/Ramesh Kumar Thapa Surya Bahadur 821 Thapa/Man Bamrang 7 165-1223 394 72+740 1255 450 180 270 805 21.5
Bahadur Thapa Nar Bahadur/Man Bahadur/Nar 822 Bamrang 7 165-1223 391 72+760 2145 79 10 69 2066 3.2 Bahadur/Ramesh K. Thapa Surya Bahadur 823 Thapa/Man Bamrang 7 165-1223 393 72+740 440 10 0 10 430 2.3
Bahadur Thapa Nar Bahadur/Man Bahadur/Amar 824 Bamrang 7 165-1223 392 72+780 930 390 156 234 540 25.2 Bahadur/Ramesh Kumar Thapa
825 Bal Kumar Bamrang 7 165-1223 469 72+780 510 216 81 135 294 26.5
826 Ram Kaji Bhujel Bamrang 7 165-1223 467 72+800 255 150 60 90 105 35.3
133
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Tom Prasad 827 Bamrang 7 165-1223 465 72+820 540 381 152 229 159 42.4 Dhakal 828 Kopila Acharya Bamrang 7 165-1223 436 72+820 2100 320 140 180 1780 8.6
829 Ram Kaji Bhujel Bamrang 7 165-1223 463 72+870 570 256 112 144 314 25.3
Amar Bahadur 830 Jit Bahadur Makar Dhoj Bamrang 7 165-1223 378 72+880 3765 1050 420 630 2715 16.7 Thapa 831 Jatan Shova Rai Bamrang 7 165-1223 479 72+940 509 10 0 10 499 2
832 Kopila Acharya Bamrang 7 165-1223 480 72+940 1506 10 0 10 1496 0.7
833 Kopila Acharya Bamrang 7 165-1223 434 602 126 45 81 476 13.5
Amar Bahadur 834 Jit Bahadur Makar Dhoj Bamrang 7 165-1223 379 72+960 1300 327 163 164 973 12.6 Thapa Man Bahadur 835 Jit Bahadur Makar Dhoj Bamrang 7 165-1223 380 72+960 990 720 360 360 270 36.4 Thapa Mahan Bahadur 836 Jit Bahadur Makar Dhoj Bamrang 7 165-1223 382 73+040 10110 174 40 134 9936 1.3 Thapa Khadga Bahadur 837 Duryodhan Bir Bahadur Bamrang 7 165-1223 376 73+045 2060 70 15 55 1990 2.7 Thapa 838 Sanu Kaji Thapa Nar Bahadur Amar Bahadur Bamrang 7 165-1223 381 73+050 2995 1020 408 612 1975 20.4
Krishna Maya 839 Man Bahadur Dal Mardan Bamrang 7 165-1223 338 73+180 10020 551 220 331 9469 3.3 Katuwal Bhagawati 840 Kabi Raj Gopal Bamrang 7 165-1223 339 73+140 3425 750 300 450 2675 13.1 Katuwal 841 121 Gopi Katuwal Bamrang 6 165-1223 1244 73+280 137.5 20 10 10 117.5 7.3
Ramesh Kumar 842 125 Bamrang 6 165-1223 1245 73+300 337.5 306 122 184 31.5 54.5 Katuwal Krishna 843 Sete Kami Moti Lal Bamrang 6 165-1223 16 73+310 800 210 84 126 590 15.8 Bahadur Jaman Singh 844 Gopal Biman Singh Bamrang 6 165-1223 15 73+320 825 210 84 126 615 15.3 Katuwal 845 Kabi Raj Katuwal Gopal Biman Singh Bamrang 6 165-1223 14 73+340 645 150 60 90 495 14
Jaman Singh 846 Gopal Biman Singh Bamrang 6 165-1223 13 73+350 2805 127 50 77 2678 2.7 Katuwal Jaman Singh 847 Gopal Biman Singh Bamrang 6 165-1223 18 73+360 950 270 108 162 680 17.1 Katuwal Muga Dhan Chatra 848 Sovit Man Bamrang 6 165-1223 22 73+440 1190 20 0 20 1170 1.7 Katuwal Bahadur 849 121 Gopi Katuwal Bamrang 6 165-1223 1246 73+470 1435 240 96 144 1195 10
Ramesh Kumar 850 125 Bamrang 6 165-1223 1247 73+460 1435 390 156 234 1045 16.3 Katuwal
134
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
851 121 Gopi Katuwal Bamrang 6 165-1223 1256 73+540 210 76 20 56 134 26.7
Ramesh Kumar 852 125 Bamrang 6 165-1223 1257 73+540 210 210 84 126 0 60 Katuwal Muga Dhan Chatra 853 Sovit Man Bamrang 6 165-1223 202 73+540 2425 1536 614 922 889 38 Katuwal Bahadur Gam Singh 854 248 Kul Bahadur Sovit Man Bamrang 6 165-1223 200 73+640 1950 450 90 360 1500 18.5 Upland Katuwal Gam Singh 855 248 Kul Bahadur Sovit Man Bamrang 6 165-1223 203 73+820 6490 2065 826 1239 4425 19.1 Upland Katuwal Sundar Singh 856 Kul Bahadur Sovit Man Bamrang 6 165-1223 204 73+840 1215 174 30 144 1041 11.9 Katuwal Ratna Maya Khamba 857 Sovit Man Bamrang 6 165-1223 193 73+910 375 95 50 45 280 12 Katuwal Singh Ramesh Kumar 858 125 Bamrang 6 165-1223 1255 73+930 313 75 20 55 238 17.6 Katuwal Jaman Singh / 859 Kul Bahadur Bamrang 6 165-1223 197 73+920 2060 1575 630 945 485 45.9 Kabi Raj Ratna Maya Khamba 860 Sovit Man Bamrang 6 165-1223 196 73+960 300 20 0 20 280 6.7 Katuwal Singh Ramesh Kumar 861 125 Bamrang 6 165-1223 1265 74+020 1075 63 30 33 1012 3.1 Katuwal Purna Bahadur Chatra 862 Sovit Man Bamrang 6 165-1223 81 74+050 200 127 63 64 73 32 Katuwal Bahadur Jaman Singh/Kabi Raj/Kul 863 Bamrang 6 165-1223 74 74+080 4835 1193 472 721 3642 14.9 Bahadur/Makar Bahadur Katuwal
864 121 Gopi Katuwal Bamrang 6 165-1223 1262 74+080 630 238 121 117 392 18.6
Ramesh Kumar 865 125 Bamrang 6 165-1223 1263 74+120 630 72 20 52 558 8.3 Katuwal Man Maya 866 Sundar Singh Kul Bahadur Bamrang 6 165-1223 73 74+160 2375 650 300 350 1725 14.7 Katuwal 867 121 Gopi Katuwal Bamrang 6 165-1223 1258 74+160 1287.5 206 26 180 1081.5 14
Ramesh Kumar 868 125 Bamrang 6 165-1223 1259 74+220 1287.5 10 0 10 1277.5 0.8 Katuwal 869 Ekmaya Khatri Abhi Narayan Kripasur Bamrang 6 165-1223 68 74+240 4000 600 240 360 3400 9
870 Ekmaya Khatri Abhi Narayan Kripasur Bamrang 6 165-1223 69 74+280 2775 690 276 414 2085 14.9
871 224 Jit Bahadur Khatri Abhi Narayan Kripasur Bamrang 6 165-1223 104 74+330 4675 1230 493 737 3445 15.8 Upland Chahar
Bhim Bahadur 872 Abhi Narayan Kripasur Bamrang 6 165-1223 108 74+420 4715 600 240 360 4115 7.6 Khatri Dhan Bahadur 873 Bamrang 6 165-1223 1329 74+500 255 255 102 153 0 60 Thapa
135
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Tej Bahadur 874 240 Bhim B. Khar singh Bamrang 6 165-1223 1330 74+460 3575 740 296 444 2835 12.4 Homestead Chahar Katuwal Thir Bahadur/Ratna 875 239 Bamrang 6 165-1223 106 74+540 1830 143 53 90 1687 4.9 Bahadur Karki/ Tej Bahadur Katuwal Bhakta 876 239 Thir Bahadur Karki Jit Man Bamrang 6 165-1223 110 74+560 4215 1200 480 720 3015 17.1 Upland Chahar Bahadur Khujurek/Tej 877 Bamrang 6 165-1224 111 74+580 2900 500 200 300 2400 10.3 Bahadur Katuwal Bhakta 878 239 Thir Bahadur Karki Jit Man Bamrang 6 165-1224 500 74+600 1415 600 240 360 815 25.4 Upland Chahar Bahadur Ratna Bahadur 879 Laxman Dil Bir Bamrang 6 165-1224 506 74+640 1225 375 150 225 850 18.4 Karki 880 Mina Katuwal Bamrang 6 165-1224 1287 74+680 90 90 36 54 0 60
881 129 Parsu Ram Rai Bamrang 6 165-1224 1299 74+700 605 240 96 144 365 23.8
882 239 Nanda Kumari Rai bhakta b. Thir Jeet Man Bamrang 6 165-1224 1300 74+720 900 450 180 270 450 30 Upland Chahar
Kaji Bahadur 883 Bir Bahadur Dal Bahadur Bamrang 6 165-1224 504 74+720 900 450 180 270 450 30 Thapa 884 Mir Bamrang 6 165-1224 512 74+770 2495 510 204 306 1985 12.3
885 Sahur Man Damai Dhawaje Juthe Bamrang 6 165-1224 517 500 60 24 36 440 7.2
886 Purna Sho va Rai Bamrang 6 165-1224 1041 74+820 1525 380 115 265 1145 17.4
887 Sahur Man Damai Dhawaje Juthe Bamrang 6 165-1224 519 74+820 905 300 120 180 605 19.9
888 Nire Damai Kale Dhawaje Bamrang 6 165-1224 520 74+860 515 285 114 171 230 33.2
889 Dambere Damai Kanchane Juthe Bamrang 6 165-1224 525 74+920 605 510 204 306 95 50.6
890 Ganesh Dargi Bamrang 6 165-1224 1214 74+930 660 60 20 40 600 6.1
Bishnu Kumar 891 221 Bamrang 6 165-1224 1213 74+920 293 10 0 10 283 3.4 Shrestha Ganga Bahadur Ram 892 226 Agam Singh Bamrang 6 165-1224 535 74+960 900 600 240 360 300 40 Upland Karki Bahadur Ganga Bahadur Ram 893 Agam Singh Bamrang 6 165-1224 537 75+000 1345 330 82 248 1015 18.4 Karki Bahadur 894 Gagan Dhoj Kami Bamrang 6 165-1224 945 1000 340 187 153 660 15.3
Harke Bahadur 895 Pahal Man Chamal Bamrang 6 165-1224 542 5515 650 65 585 4865 10.6 Karki 896 Dilli Bahadur Bamrang 6 165-1224 1336 764 380 209 171 384 22.4
136
Area Land Total Area Total Land within Six Area to be Remaining HH Name of Land Owner's Ward Sheet Plot of Affected Affected Land Loss Land Moth S.N. Owner’s VDC Side Chanage Meter Acquired Area (Sq. Land Use ID Owner Grand Fatehr No. No. No. Plot Area Percentage Type No. Father Name (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Name (Sq. Meter) (Sq. Meter) Meter)
Dambar Bahadur 897 228 Ram Bdr Absingh Karki Bamrang 6 165-1224 1337 762 440 260 180 322 23.6 Upland Karki 898 Dilli Bahadur Karki Bahadur Makar Dhoj Bamrang 6 165-1224 479 2485 51 20 31 2434 1.2
Harka Bahadur 899 227 Pahal Man Chamal Bamrang 6 165-1224 544 1195 38 10 28 1157 2.3 Karki Harka Bahadur 900 227 Pahal Man Chamal Bamrang 6 165-1224 480 1070 900 360 540 170 50.5 Karki
901 219 Sita Ram Khatri Bhim Bdr Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1026 510 79 25 54 431 10.6 Upland
Chandra Bahadur 902 253 Bhim Bdr Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1027 670 360 144 216 310 32.2 Upland Khatri Bhim 903 218 Narayan Khatri Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1028 680 198 99 99 482 14.6 Upland Bahadur
904 219 Sita Ram Khatri Bhim Bdr Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1010 205 160 70 90 45 43.9 Upland
Chandra Bahadur 905 253 Bhim Bdr Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1011 310 41 6 35 269 11.3 Upland Khatri Bhim 906 218 Narayan Khatri Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1012 340 10 0 10 330 2.9 Upland Bahadur Bhim 907 218 Narayan Khatri Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1030 160 15 0 15 145 9.4 Upland Bahadur
908 220 Ram Kaji Khatri Bhim Bdr Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1029 1195 600 240 360 595 30.1 Upland
909 219 Sita Ram Khatri Bhim Bdr Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1018 990 240 96 144 750 14.5 Upland
Chandra Bahadur 910 253 Bhim Bdr Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1224 1019 760 240 96 144 520 18.9 Upland Khatri Bhim 911 218 Narayan Khatri Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1225 1020 700 270 108 162 430 23.1 Upland Bahadur
912 220 Ram Kaji Khatri Bhim Bdr Bandabir Diktel 2 165-1226 1021 900 360 144 216 540 24 Upland
111
Annex 2: Inventory of Affected Public Land with Percentage
112
Annex 2: List of Affected Pulic Land-HD Road
Total Area Total Area to Area of within Remeani Affected be Name of Sheet Plot Affected Six ng Area Land Loss Land Land Moth S.N Area Acquire Remarks Land Owner No. No. Plot Meter (Sq. Percentage Use Type No. (Sq. d (Sq. (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) 1 Public 165-1291 38 5350 1208 495 713 4142 13.3
2 Public 165-1291 38 1950 95 0 95 1855 4.9
3 Public 165-1291 349 6080 981 456 525 5099 8.6
4 Bublic 165-1291 436 16245 159 0 159 16086 1.0
Ratmani 5 165-1291 204 0 0 0 0 0 Jungle 6 Public 165-1291 408 1245 225 102 123 1020 9.9
7 Jungle 165-1292 1 989490 39423 39423 950067 4.0
8 Road 165-1292 68 174225 1230 1230 172995 0.7
Maithan 9 165-1292 274 20440 2160 864 1296 18280 6.3 Guthi 10 Public 165-1292 311 12185 255 102 153 11930 1.3
11 Public 165-1332 414 74320 7350 2940 4410 66970 5.9
12 Publiuc 165-1293 347 5900 285 114 171 5615 2.9
13 Public 165-1293 359 1040 300 120 180 740 17.3
14 Public 165-1293 399 313815 1535 1535 312280 0.5
15 Public 165-1293 174 4230 508 300 208 3722 4.9
16 Public 165-1293 177 1050 95 30 65 955 6.2
17 Public 165-1293 155 440 95 24 71 345 16.1
18 Public 165-1293 156 795 385 154 231 410 29.1
19 Public 165-1293 100 181815 5685 5685 176130 3.1
Kirat Udgam 20 Bhumi 165-1293 494 55775 1142 282 860 54633 1.5 Tuyachun
113
Total Area Total Area to Area of within Remeani Affected be Name of Sheet Plot Affected Six ng Area Land Loss Land Land Moth S.N Area Acquire Remarks Land Owner No. No. Plot Meter (Sq. Percentage Use Type No. (Sq. d (Sq. (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) 21 Public 165-1294 402 26435 827 331 496 25608 1.9
22 Public 165-1294 225 12400 6510 2604 3906 5890 31.5
23 Public 165-1294 232 4640 450 180 270 4190 5.8
24 Public 165-1254 225 1240 690 276 414 550 33.4
25 Public 165-1254 224 5680 1050 420 630 4630 11.1
26 Public 165-1254 267 1040 255 255 785 24.5
27 public 165-1254 154 13460 540 215 325 12920 2.4
28 Public 165-1100 204 285 38 25 13 247 4.6
29 Public 165-1100 205 2435 693 277 416 1742 17.1
30 Main Road 165-1100 9 6990 0 6990 0.0
31 Jungle/Public 165-1101 106 320400 13830 5532 8298 306570 2.6
32 Public 165-1254 112 37810 2323 2323 35487 6.1
33 Public 165-1254 308 19590 445 85 360 19145 1.8
34 Public 165-1214 267 1040 0 1040 0.0
Saraswoti 35 Primary 165-1214 274 475 95 50 45 380 9.5 School Arkhale Village 36 165-1214 117 255 95 50 45 160 17.6 District Committee Road of 37 165-1214 681 183 24 12 12 159 6.6 Government Public( 38 Hariya 165-1214 560 88 47 10 37 41 42.0 Arkhale)
114
Total Area Total Area to Area of within Remeani Affected be Name of Sheet Plot Affected Six ng Area Land Loss Land Land Moth S.N Area Acquire Remarks Land Owner No. No. Plot Meter (Sq. Percentage Use Type No. (Sq. d (Sq. (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) 39 Public 165-1215 431 6000 508 158 350 5492 5.8
Community Sarokar 40 Saving&Credi 165-1215 664 75 75 0 75 0 100.0 t Cooperative Ltd 41 Public 165-1176 296 12800 2670 1068 1602 10130 12.5
42 Jungle 165-1176 238 284950 1500 600 900 283450 0.3
Sandhi 43 Sarpan 165-1176 109 33030 3450 1300 2150 29580 6.5 Public 44 Public 165-1177 169 8530 1650 660 990 6880 11.6
45 Public 165-1177 175 5950 360 144 216 5590 3.6
46 Public 165-1177 162 58500 2220 888 1332 56280 2.3
47 Jungle/Public 165-1177 371 85500 15300 6120 9180 70200 10.7
Bil Bery Devi 48 165-1177 374 22750 128 0 128 22622 0.6 Than 49 Public 165-1178 524 8625 1350 515 835 7275 9.7
50 Public 165-1178 16 2155 24 10 14 2131 0.6
Public 51 165-1178 62 19525 365 212 153 19160 0.8 /Jungle 52 Public 165-1178 40 65090 3542 1416 2126 61548 3.3
53 Main Road 165-1138 182 0 0
54 Public 165-1138 177 3100 445 220 225 2655 7.3
55 Public 165-1138 200 800 750 300 450 50 56.3
56 Public 165-1139 201 2765 254 30 224 2511 8.1
115
Total Area Total Area to Area of within Remeani Affected be Name of Sheet Plot Affected Six ng Area Land Loss Land Land Moth S.N Area Acquire Remarks Land Owner No. No. Plot Meter (Sq. Percentage Use Type No. (Sq. d (Sq. (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) 57 Public 165-1139 209 14760 2700 1080 1620 12060 11.0
58 Public 165-1139 383 0 0
Devi Than 59 165-1139 63 146680 9900 3960 5940 136780 4.0 Jungle Jalpa 60 Secondary 165-1139 331 2350 510 204 306 1840 13.0 Schoo Shree Jalpa 61 Secondary 165-1140 1 1120 259 91 168 861 15.0 School Shree Jalpa 62 Secondary 165-1140 2 915 208 91 117 707 12.8 School Shree Jalpa 63 Secondary 165-1140 3 2310 296 37 259 2014 11.2 School 64 Public 165-1140 5 2775 660 165 495 2115 17.8
65 Jungle 165-1100 502 7395 264 33 231 7131 3.1
66 Public 165-1100 63 0 0
67 Public 165-1100 65 945 608 266 342 337 36.2
68 Public 165-1100 64 1585 230 25 205 1355 12.9
69 Jungle/Public 165-1102 118 611110 12000 4800 7200 599110 1.2
70 Public 165-1103 791 94225 10500 4200 6300 83725 6.7
71 Public 165-1103 796 3715 111 10 101 3604 2.7
72 Public 165-1103 795 3540 1200 480 720 2340 20.3
73 Public 165-1183 256 5200 750 300 450 4450 8.7
116
Total Area Total Area to Area of within Remeani Affected be Name of Sheet Plot Affected Six ng Area Land Loss Land Land Moth S.N Area Acquire Remarks Land Owner No. No. Plot Meter (Sq. Percentage Use Type No. (Sq. d (Sq. (Sq. (Sq. Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) Meter) Educational 74 Training 165-1183 518 2035 206 71 135 1829 6.6 Center 75 165-1223 340 100 100 55 45 0 45.0
76 Public 165-1223 341 1925 500 200 300 1425 15.6
77 Public 165-1223 19 4645 1230 492 738 3415 15.9
117
Annex-3: Inventory of Affected Private Trees
118
Annex 3.1: Affected Private Trees (Timber) HD Road
Tree S.N. Name of Tree Owner Address Plot No. Number Species Mahadevasthan – 1 Harish Chandra Rai Shirish 1 2 Mahadevasthan – 2 Harish Chandra Rai Sallo 4 2 3 Chitra Kumar Shrestha Arkhaule 5 515 Lakuri 1 4 Garbabati Rai Mahadevsthan-2 530 Sallo 3 Mahadevasthan – 5 Bainsingh Rai 14 Sallo 5 2 Mahadevasthan – 6 Bainsingh Rai 14 Chilaoune 2 2 Khadga Bahadur 7 Salle-6 275 Chilaoune 5 Shrestha 8 Til Bahadur Shrestha Salle-6 276 Chilaoune 1 Mahadevasthan – 9 Kamala K.C Dar 1 4 10 Dinesh Giri Mahadevasthan-4 911 Utis 10 11 Dinesh Giri Mahadevasthan-4 911 Utis 10 12 Min Prasad Dahal Mahadevasthan-1 374 Utis 4 13 Tej Kumar Shrestha Arkhaule-1 568 Utis 4 14 Sabda Kumar Shrestha Arkhaule-5 567 Utis 6 15 Dhan Kumar Rai Mahadevasthan-1 676 Utis 5 16 Chabilai Giri Arkhaule-5 475 Utis 20 17 Shiva Lal Giri Arkhaule-5 80/82 Utis 40 18 Puspa Lal Giri Arkhaule-2 189 Utis 40
Annex 3.2: Affected Private Trees (Fodder)-HD Road
S.N. Name of Tree Owner Address Plot No. Tree Species Number Navaraj Basnet Mahadevasthan- 1 34 Ghotle 1 4 Navaraj Basnet Mahadevasthan- 2 34 khari 1 4 Mahadevasthan- 3 Chitra Kumar Shrestha 515 jaamuna 1 4 Mahadevasthan – 4 Kamala K.C Kutmero 1 4 5 Tuachun+Kale Kami Mahadevasthan- Khanayo 1
119
S.N. Name of Tree Owner Address Plot No. Tree Species Number 1 Mahadevasthan- 6 Hamalser Rai 356 Khanayo 1 1 Mahadevasthan- 7 Ram Prasad Dahal 374 Kutmero 2 1 Mahadevasthan- 8 Ganesh Timsena 371 Khanayo 2 1 9 Mittha Maya Subedi Salle – 8 353 Khanayo 1 10 Lekhnath Subedi Arkhoe-6 227 Gagun 5 11 Lekhnath Subedi Salle-8 458 Dhanuke 2 12 Tagaraj Subedi Salle – 8 Patmiro 1 13 Nerra Prasad Subedi Salle – 8 448 Khanayo 3 14 Netra Prasad Subedi Salle- 8 651 Patmiro 2 15 Kumar Subedi Salle – 8 352 Khaniyo 1 16 Tej Bahadur Subedi Arkhaule – 6 659 Butyan 7 17 Nar Bahadur Subedi Salle – 8 658 Butyan 10 18 Harka Bahadur Salle – 8 338,336 Buty an 8 19 Khadga Bahadur Shrestha Arkhaule – 5 274 Dhanuke 1 20 Khadga Bahadur Shrestha Arkhaule – 5 274,276 Kutmero 4 21 Khadga Bahadur Shrestha Arkhaule – 5 274 Painou 2 22 Parsuram Shrestha Arkhaule – 5 27 Kutmero 1 23 Dhan Bahadur Shrestha Arkhaule – 6 31 Bahabis 1 24 Dhan Bahadur Shrestha Arkhaule – 6 531 Kutmero 1 25 Lochan Shrerstha Arkhaule – 6 15 Painou 1 26 Lochan Shrerstha Arkhaule – 6 15 Dhanuk 2 27 Lochan Shrerstha Arkhaule – 6 15 Newaro 1 28 Gauri Narayan Shrestha Salle – 6 331 Kutmero 1 29 Gauri Narayan Shrestha Salle – 6 331 Payale 1 30 Sita Salle - 298 Goana 1 31 Ganga Bahadur Shrestha Salle – 6 297 Painou 1 32 Ganga Bahadur Shrestha Salle – 6 297 Kutmero 1 33 Indra Bahadur Shrestha Salle – 6 272 Painou 1 34 Tika Ram Puri Arkhaule – 2 193 Dudhilo 1 35 Mittha Maya Salle – 8 353 Khanayo 1 36 Mittha Maya Salle – 8 353 Kutmero 1 37 Lekhnath Subedi Salle – 8 454 Gagun 5
120
S.N. Name of Tree Owner Address Plot No. Tree Species Number 38 Leknath Subedi Arkhaule -6 227 Dhanuko 2 39 Tagraj Subedi Salle – 8 Patmiro 1 40 Netra Prasad Subedi Salle – 8 377 Khanayo 10 41 Netra Prasad Subedi Salle – 8 651 Patmiro 2
Annex 3.3: Affected Private Trees (Fruit)-HD Road
S.N. Name of Tree Owner Address Plot No. Tree Species Number 1 Navaraj Basnet Nunthala – 9 34 Banana 18 2 Navaraj Basnet Nunthala – 9 34 Orange 5 3 Chitra Bahadur Shrestha Mahadevasthan 515 Apple 1 4 Chitra Bahadur Shrestha Mahadevasthan 515 Arou 1 5 Chitra Bahadur Shrestha Mahadevasthan 515 Nibuwa 1 6 Posta Raj K.C Mahadevasthan - 1 Nibuwa 1 7 Bhakta Kumar Shrestha Mahadevasthan - 1 302 Chiouri 1
Annex 3.4: Affected Private Trees (Bamboo)-HD Road
S.N Name of Tree Owner Address Plot No. Tree Species Number 1 Tika Devi Rai Mahadevasthan - 2 573,76 Bambo 58 2 Ganga Raj Rai Mahadevasthan - 2 69 Bamboo 60 3 Kripasur Rai Mahadevasthan - 2 309 Bamboo 10 4 Hamalser Rai Mahadevasthan - 1 347 Bamboo 10 5 Garvabati Rai Mahadevasthan - 2 308 Bamboo 10 6 Chitra Kumar Shrestha Mahadevasthan - 515 Bamboo 10 Amba Kumari 7 Arkhaule – 5 433 Bamboo 50 Shrestha Khadga Bahadur 8 Arkhaule – 5 275 Bamboo 5 Shrestha 9 Til Bahadur Shrestha Salle – 6 266 B amboo 30 10 Ramita Rai Arkhale - 5 462 Bamboo 40 11 Radha Puri Arkhaule – 2 626 Bamboo 10 12 Chabilal Giri Arkhaule – 5 475 Bamboo 50 13 Shivalal Giri Arkhaule – 2 80/82 Bamboo 80 14 Puspa Lal Giri Arkhaule – 2 189 Bamboo 40 15 Eakraj Subedi Salle – 8 20 Bamboo 20
121
Annex - 4: Inventory of Affected Private Structures
122
Annex 4: List of Affected Private Structure-HD Road
Descripti Measurement Roof Structure Present on (Meter) No of Area Affected Construction S.N Structure Owner Address Remarks Type Use Of the Storey (Meter) Condition Year Year Type Wall L B 1 Navaraj Basnet Halesi 1 4 1 1 9.9 4.6 2 45.54 2 2052 2 Moti Lal Giri Halesi 4 4 1 5 4.7 4 1 18.8 2 3 Ekan Rai Halesi 2 2 1 7.6 5.1 3 38.76 2 Under Construction 4 Kamala K.C Halesi 4 4 10 4 1 40 2 Not Covered by Wall 5 Kampasher Rai 4 4 1 7.6 4.5 1 34.2 2 1980 6 Ganesh Timsena Barkhetar 2 2 3 1 12 4 2 48 2 2067 7 Lila Prasad Subedi Salle 2 2 3 1 7.74 4.4 3 34.056 2 2063 8 Laxman Subedi Salle 1 4 1 1 8 5 2 40 2 2046 9 Nar Bahadur Subei Salle 1 4 1 1 4.5 6 2 27 2 1990 10 Lekh Nath Subedi Salle 1 4 1 1 4.8 6.3 1 30.24 2 11 Lekh Nath Subedi Salle 1 4 1 1 7.8 4.5 2 35.1 2 12 Lekh Nath Subedi Salle 1 4 1 1 4.5 6.8 1 30.6 2 Nar Bahadur 13 Subedi Salle 1 4 1 1 4.1 2.7 2 11.07 2 Bishnu Prasad 4.45 14 Subedi Salle 1 4 1 1 5.85 4 2 26.0559 2 Bishnu Prasad 15 Subedi Salle 1 4 1 1 4.3 7.3 2 31.39 2 Shyam Kumar 16 Shrestha Salle 4 4 5 4 1 20 2 Durga Bahadur 17 Shrestha Salle 2 3 1 8.4 7.5 3 63 2 2067 Bhakta Bahadur 18 Shrestha Salle 2 3 5 5.8 3.5 1 20.3 2 Dhan Bahadur 19 Shrestha Arkhaule 4 2 2 5 6.5 3 1 19.5 2 2069 20 Gyanthuk Shrestha Arkhaule 1 4 1 1 8.75 4 2 35 2 2045
123
Descripti Measurement Roof Structure Present on (Meter) No of Area Affected Construction S.N Structure Owner Address Remarks Type Use Of the Storey (Meter) Condition Year Year Type Wall L B Chandra Kumari 21 Shrestha Arkhaule 1 4 3 1 6.7 3.9 2 26.13 2 2048 Man Bahadur 22 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 3 1 6 6.6 2 39.6 2 Man Bahadur 23 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 2 1 4 2.5 2 10 2 Ram Kumar 24 Shrestha Arkhaule 1 4 4 1 4 6 1 24 2050 Ram Kumar 25 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 5 1 2 1.5 3 2 2052 26 Madab Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 6 6.55 2 39.3 2 Sabda Kumar 27 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 8.6 4.9 2 42.14 2 28 Ganesh Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 2 2 7.9 6.1 2 48.19 2 29 Balkumar Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 2 3 4.2 2 12.6 2 Indra Kumar 30 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 2 1 6.85 4.35 2 29.7975 2 Indra Kumar 31 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 2 5.7 5 1 28.5 2 Lekh Kumari 32 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 8.6 7.16 2 61.576 2 33 Sabita Magar Arkhaule 2 1 1 1 6.7 4.9 2 32.83 2 34 Ram Babu Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 3 2 11.6 5 2 58 2 Gopal Kumar 35 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 3 2 5.2 9.5 2 49.4 2 Rent Durga Mani 36 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 7 5 2 35 2 Durga Mani 37 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 2 1 8.5 5 2 42.5 2 38 Durga Mani Arkhaule 1 2 1 1 8.5 5 1 42.5 2
124
Descripti Measurement Roof Structure Present on (Meter) No of Area Affected Construction S.N Structure Owner Address Remarks Type Use Of the Storey (Meter) Condition Year Year Type Wall L B Shrestha 39 Sagad Bahadur Rai Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 5 4.5 2 22.5 2 40 Raj Kumar Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 8.7 4.5 2 39.15 2 41 Seet Bahadur Rai Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 5 4.5 2 22.5 2 42 Keshab Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 8 5 2 40 2 43 Birkagi Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 7 4 2 28 2 44 Birkagi Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 7 4 2 28 2 45 Raj Kumar Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 4.6 3.3 2 15.18 2 46 Tej Kumar Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 11.3 4.4 2 49.72 2 47 Lalkagi Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 7.2 4.05 2 29.16 2 Jagad Bahadur 48 Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 2 2 8.15 5 2 40.75 2 49 Tej Kumar Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 2 2 4.4 9 2 39.6 2 50 Sarada Shrestha Arkhaule 2 2 2 1 5.2 4.46 2 23.192 2 51 Deuman Kami Arkhaule 2 1 1 1 4 7.7 2 30.8 2 Santi Kumar 52 Rai&Dhan Bdr Rai Arkhaule 2 2 2 1 14 5 2 70 2 53 Shanker Puri Arkhaule 1 4 1 1 6.2 4.5 1 27.9 2 Surja Bahadur 54 Shrestha Arkhaule 1 4 3 1 7.3 4.5 1 32.85 2 55 Sagad Puri Arkhaule 1 4 1 1 7.86 4.5 1 35.37 2 Krishna Bahadur 56 Puri Arkhaule 2 2 3 2 9.7 4.6 2 44.62 2 57 Chet Nath Puri &… Arkhaule 2 2 1 1 13.5 4 1 54 2 Lok Narayan 58 Shrestha Arkhaule 1 4 1 1 7.5 4 1 30 2 59 Nir Maya Puri Arkhaule 1 4 1 1 6.8 4.25 1 28.9 2 60 Shiva Lal Giri Arkhaule 1 4 3 1 7.2 4 1 28.8 2
125
Descripti Measurement Roof Structure Present on (Meter) No of Area Affected Construction S.N Structure Owner Address Remarks Type Use Of the Storey (Meter) Condition Year Year Type Wall L B 61 Dhana Maya Giri Arkhaule 1 4 1 1 6 4 1 24 2 Krishna Bahadur 62 Puri Arkhaule 2 2 1 2 4.8 8.7 2 41.76 2 63 Bhim Kumar Rai Arkhaule 1 4 1 1 12 6 2 72 2 64 Subesh Rai Arkhaule 1 4 1 1 6.8 4.2 2 28.56 2 65 Purna Shova Darji Nunthala 2 2 3 2 8.5 4.3 3 36.55 2 66 Kale Tamang Nunthala 2 2 1 1 4.5 9 1 40.5 2 Khadka Bahadur 67 Tamang Nunthala 2 2 1 1 7.5 8 2 60 2 Chandra Maya 68 Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 1 3.7 7 2 25.9 2 69 Jai Kumari Rai Nunthala 1 4 1 1 7.2 9.2 2 66.24 2 Khadka Bahadur 70 Rai Nunthala 2 2 1 1 7.4 6 2 44.4 2 71 Gumsair Rai Nunthala 2 2 1 2 11.8 4.4 2 51.92 2 72 Naibartna Rai Nunthala 2 2 4-Jan 2 10.7 4.8 2 51.36 2 73 Siva Sari Rai Nunthala 2 2 2-Jan 3 5.3 6.2 2 32.86 2 74 Moti Chandra Rai Nunthala 2 2 2-Jan 3 5.1 7.3 1 37.23 2 Lal Bahadur 75 Bumjan Nunthala 1 1 1 1 3.4 4.1 1 13.94 2 Dil Bahadur 76 Tamang Nunthala 2 2 1 2 9.4 4.2 2 39.48 2 77 Sakti Man Tamang Nunthala 2 2 1 1 4.2 8.7 2 36.54 2 Chandra Bahadur 78 Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 2 4.1 7.1 2 29.11 2 79 Sagad Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 1 5.4 7 1 37.8 2 80 Bhim Bahadur Nunthala 1 4 1 1 6.1 9.5 1 57.95 2 81 Krishna Maya Nunthala 2 2 1 2 8.4 4.7 2 39.48 2
126
Descripti Measurement Roof Structure Present on (Meter) No of Area Affected Construction S.N Structure Owner Address Remarks Type Use Of the Storey (Meter) Condition Year Year Type Wall L B Tamang Aaiman Singh 82 Tamang Nunthala 2 2 1 2 4.8 9.5 2 45.6 2 Bishnu Maya 83 Tamang Nunthala 2 4 1 1 7.1 4 2 28.4 2 84 Dilmaya Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 1 6.6 3.3 1 21.78 2 85 Yeni Maya Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 1 3.8 7.4 1 28.12 2 Chandra Bahadur 86 Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 1 7 6 1 42 2 87 Baburam Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 1 8 3.2 2 25.6 2 Chandra Bahadur 88 Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 7.3 4.1 2 29.93 2 89 Nepali Taman g Nunthala 2 2 1 1 6.5 3.5 2 22.75 2 90 Fiste Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 1 11.1 4 2 44.4 2 91 Pabitra Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 1 6 4 1 24 2 92 Prakash Tamang Nunthala 1 4 1 1 6 3.5 1 21 2 93 Hira Maya Tamang Nunthala 2 2 1 1 8.5 4.3 3 36.55 2 Bir Bahadur 94 Tamang Nunthala 2 2 1 2 8.1 4.3 2 34.83 2 95 Hira Maya Tamang Nunthala 2 2 3 1 6.2 4 2 24.8 2 Kalpana Lama 96 Tamang Nunthala 2 2 3 1 8.5 4.7 2 39.95 2 97 Dafuri Sherpa Nunthala 1 4 3 1 12 7 1 84 2 98 Pasang Nuri Sherpa Nunthala 1 4 3 5 7.1 3 1 21.3 2 99 Sandip Rai Dektel 1 4 3 5 6.5 3 2 19.5 2 100 Prem Tamang Dektel 1 2 3 5 8 4 2 32 2 101 Sudar sing Katwal Bamrang 2 2 1 2 4.9 8 3 39.2 2 102 Sit Bahadur Khatri Bamrang 2 2 3 2 9.4 6 3 56.4 2
127
Descripti Measurement Roof Structure Present on (Meter) No of Area Affected Construction S.N Structure Owner Address Remarks Type Use Of the Storey (Meter) Condition Year Year Type Wall L B 103 Ram Kagi Khatri Dektel 2 2 3 2 5 10 3 50 2 Mohan Bahadur 104 Karki Dektel 2 2 1 2 5 11 2 55 2 Mohan Bahadur 105 Karki Dektel 2 2 1 2 5 18 2 90 2 Krishna Bahadur 106 Puri Arkhaule 2 4 1 1 7.5 4.6 2 34.5 2
LEGEND
Description of structures Type of No Roof NO. No. Wall Types No. Present Use No. Affected condition Structures . Types 1 Traditional 1 Thatch 1 Stone with mud mortar. 1 Residential 1 Semi-affected
2 Semi-modern 2 Tin 2 Stone,mud with plaster 2 Trade 2 Fully- affected mortar(external) 3 Modern 3 RCC 3 Stone with cement mortar. 3 Trade+Residenti 3 Brick with Cement plaster al 4 Hut 4 Hut 4 Bamboo and Wood fence 4 Rented 4 5 Toilet 5 5 5 5
128
Annex-5: List of Vulnerable Households
129
Annex 5.1: Women Headed Households List
House Owner Land Owner Grand Father S.No VDC Father Name Name Name Name 1 Mahadevsthan Vim Kesar Rai Sita Devi Rai hak Raj Rai Aashparat Rai Amba Kumari 2 Arkhaule Lal Kaji Shrestha Purna Kumar Kajiman Shrestha 3 Arkhaule Dhan Maya Giri Tej Bdr. Giri Kripa Dhoj Pahal Man Krisna Kumar Til Bdr. Chandra Bdr. 4 Arkhaule Krisna Shrestha Shrestha Shrestha Shrestha 5 Arkhaule Tirtha Kumari Puri Tirtha Kumari Puri Mugh Raj Lal Bdr Bisnu Maya 6 Nunthala Bisnu Maya Tamang Sher Bdr Dhan Bdr Tamang 7 Nunthala Sarkimati Rai Sarkimati Rai Pancha Bdr. Sa Asardhoj Krisna Bdr. 8 Nunthala Hiramaya Tamang Hira Maya Tamang Khadga Bdr Tamang 9 Nunthala Shivsari Rai Santa Kumari Rai Sarbadhir Saran Dhoj 10 Nunthala Nirmaya Tamang Nirmaya Tamang Dik Bdr Furba 11 Nunthala Bhim Kumari Rai Bhim Kumari Rai Hamber Bdr Lila Bdr Harka Bdr /Yani 12 Nunthala Yani Maya Tamang Jamana Singh Bang Dorje Maya Tamang Chyang 13 Nunthala Padma Tamang Padma Tamang Bajraman Tamang Laghu Dhan Mhitra Maya 14 Nunthala Tamang/Bhitra Gajman Sajne Tamang Tamang Maya Tamang 15 Nunthala Bimala Tamang Buddiman Tamnag Bal Singh Lok Dorje Thir b / Nand 16 Bamrang Nanda Kumari Thir bhakta b. Thir Jeet Man Kumari 17 Bamrang Jay Kumari rai Dhyan Bdr. Rai Kampa Kher Gokul Man 18 Bamrang Gyani Thapa Gyani Thapa p. Gyan Thapa Hark B. Thapa 19 Bamrang Til Maya Thapa Til maya Thapa Dik Ba. Tim Ba 20 Diktel Swarswoti Thapa Sarswoti Thapa Sher Bdr Samber Bdr
130
131
Annex 5.2: Household with Disabled Members
Sno Name of Land Name of Household VDC Ward No Form No Father Name Grand Father Name Owner Head Mahadevsthan 1 1 126 Utra Sher Magar Utra SherMagar Bhadra BdrMagar Salle 2 8 12 Kumar Subedi Kumar Subedi Tanka Man Subedi Narman Subedi Arkhaule 3 5 29 Nar Prasad Subedi nar PrasadSubedi Tek NathSubedi Karna Khar Subedi Nunthala 4 9 248 Man Bdr. Tamang Man BdrTamang ChaturmanTamang Purna Tamang Bamrang 5 8 22 Dhyan Bdr. Rai Jay Kumari rai Kampa Kherrai Gokul Man rai Diktel 6 6 324 Sarswoti Thapa SwarswotiThapa Sher BdrThapa Samber BdrThapa Annex 5.3: Household Headed by Elderly People
Sno Ward Name of Household Grand Father VDC Form No Name of Land Owner Father Name No Head Name Hari Kumar Thapa,Shankar Bdr. Bamrang 1 6 364 Rekh Bdr. Thapa Rek Bdr. Thapa Thapa, Shiva Bdr. Thapa, Dal bdr. Thapa Diktel 2 6 308 Bhim Bdr Thapa Bhim Bdr Man Bdr Man Singh Kharpa 3 1 52 Mahajit rai Mahajitrai Gaurimanrai Betal Singhrai 4 9 248 Man Bdr. Tamang Man BdrTamang ChaturmanTamang PurnaTamang Nunthala 5 9 65 Sarkimaya Tamang Bhim bdr.Tamang Bhim bdr. Tamang BulungTamang 6 1 38 Tike Sarki Tikesarki Khambe sarki
Dhan Arkhaule 7 5 223 Jagat Bdr Shrestha Jagat Bdr.Shrestha Kul BdrShrestha KrisnaShrestha
132
Annex 5.4: Household With Below Poverty Level
Household Grand S.No. VDC Ward No Head Name Land Owner Name Father Name Father Name 1 Mahadevsthan 7 Aun Sher Rai Aun Sher rai Chhatra Bdr Birkha Bdr 2 Mahadevsthan 7 Ikan Rai Ikan Rai Lal Kumar Chatra Bdr 3 Salle 8 Yek Raj subedi Harka Bdr. Subedi Surya Prasad Subedi Dev Datta Subedi 4 Arkhaule 5 Kamal Prasad Puri Kamal Puri Gopi Lal Puri Prem Lal 5 Arkhaule 4 Surja Bdr Shrestha Surja Bdr. Shrestha Harka Bdr Ram Bdr 6 Arkhaule 6 Motilal Shrestha Motilal shrestha Bhadraman Dhanjuram 7 Arkhaule 5 Chakra Bdr. Shrestha Chakra Bdr. Shrestha Bakhat Bdr. Harka Bdr. 8 Arkhaule 5 Lila Subedi Lilamaya Subedi Lilamaya Subedi Devicharan 9 Nunthala 1 Devendra Tamang Devendra Tamang Ratna Tamang Saharman 10 Nunthala 9 Bisnu Maya Tamang Bisnu Maya Tamang Sher Bdr Dhan Bdr 11 Nunthala 9 Padma Tamang Padma Tamang Bajraman Chyang Tamang 12 Nunthala 9 Bhim bdr. Tamang Sarkimaya Tamang Bhim bdr. Tamang Bulung 13 Bamrang 8 Gita Kumari Basnet Gita Kumari Basnet Khadga Bdr,Chandra Bdr Basnet Nar Bdr 14 Bamrang 7 Gyani Thapa Gyani Thapa Gyani Thapa Hark B. Thapa 15 Bamrang 8 Jay Kumari rai Dhyan Bdr. Rai Kampa Kher Gokul Man 16 Diktel 6 Pasang Sherpa Bem Lamu Sherpa Pasang Sherpa Mingur Sherpa
133
Annex - 6: Minute of Public Consultation
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
Annex - 7: Cost Estimation of Affected Assets
144
Annex 7.1: Structure Costing Norms Category of Structure and Unit Rate
S.N. Description of Structure Unit Rate (NRS)
Stone & mud mortar wall with straw roof and plastered by 1. Square metre 3870.967 mud mortar
Stone & mud mortar wall with slate or corrugated zinc sheet 2. Square metre 8172.043 roof and plastered by mud mortar
Stone & mud mortar wall with slate or corrugated zinc sheet 3. Square metre 9139.784 roof and plastered by cement mortar
Stone & mud mortar wall with RCC roof and plastered by 4. Square metre 9946.236 cement mortar
Stone or brick & cement mortar wall with slate or corrugated 5. Square metre 10322.58 zinc sheet roof and plastered by cement mortar
Stone or brick & cement mortar wall with RCC roof and 6. Square metre 10967.741 plastered by cement mortar
RCC frame structure, stone or brick & cement mortar wall 7. Square metre 11720.43 with RCC roof and plastered by cement mortar
Annex 7.2: Cost Estimation of Affected Private Trees (Timber)-MR Road S.N. Tree Species Number Cost (NRS.)* Total Cost (NRS.) 1 Shirish 1 2000 2000 2 Sallo 4 2000 8000 3 Lakuri 1 1500 1500 4 Sallo 3 2000 6000 5 Sallo 5 2000 10000 6 Chilaoune 2 2000 4000 7 Chilaoune 5 2000 10000 8 Chilaoune 1 2000 2000 9 Utis 20 1500 30000 10 Utis 4 1500 6000 11 Utis 4 1500 6000 12 Utis 6 1500 9000 13 Utis 5 1500 7500 14 Utis 20 1500 30000 15 Utis 40 1500 60000 16 Utis 40 1500 60000 Total 161 252000 Cost of Timber trees is estimated after the cosultation with the local people The cost of Bamboo is calculated on the basis of RS. 50 per piece.
Annex 7.3: Cost Estimation of Affected Private Trees (Fooder)-HD Road
145
Average Average Annual Five Years Total Tree S.N. Number Production Rate Income Income Cost Species (kg)/Year (NRS.)* (NRS.) (NRS) (NRS 1 Ghotle 1 40 5 200 1000 1000 2 Khari 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 3 Jaamuna 1 40 8 320 1600 1600 4 Khanayo 1 40 8 320 1600 1600 5 Khanayo 1 40 8 320 1600 1600 6 2 80 6 480 2400 4800 7 Khanayo 2 80 8 640 3200 6400 9 Khanayo 1 45 8 360 1800 1800 10 Gagun 5 150 5 750 3750 18750 11 Dhanuke 2 80 5 400 2000 4000 12 Patmiro 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 13 Khanayo 3 120 8 960 4800 14400 14 Patmiro 2 80 6 480 2400 4800 15 Khaniyo 1 40 8 320 1600 1600 16 Butyan 7 35 5 175 875 6125 17 Butyan 10 50 5 250 1250 12500 18 Butyan 8 40 5 200 1000 8000 19 Dhanuke 1 40 5 200 1000 1000 20 Kutmero 4 140 6 840 4200 16800 21 Painou 2 80 6 480 2400 4800 22 Kutmero 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 23 Bahabis 1 40 5 200 1000 1000 24 Kutmero 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 25 Painou 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 26 Dhanuk 2 80 5 400 2000 4000 27 Newaro 1 50 8 400 2000 2000 28 Kutmero 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 29 Payale 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 30 Goana 1 40 5 200 1000 1000 31 Painou 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 32 Kutmero 1 50 6 300 1500 1500 33 Painou 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 34 Dudhilo 1 40 5 200 1000 1000 35 Khanayo 1 40 8 320 1600 1600 36 Kutmero 1 50 6 300 1500 1500 37 Gagun 5 150 5 750 3750 18750 38 Dhanuko 2 80 5 400 2000 4000 39 Patmiro 1 40 6 240 1200 1200 40 Khanayo 10 200 8 1600 8000 80000 41 Patmiro 2 80 6 480 2400 4800 Total 92 - - - - 244725
146
Annex 7.4: Cost Estimation of Affected Private Trees (Fruit)-HD Road Fruit Bearing Trees Annua Total S.N Specie Productio Total l Rate/kg* Cost . s No. n (kg)/ Productio Incom Remarks * (NRS)** Year n e * (NRS) 1 Banana 13 40 520 5 2600 2600 One Year 2 Orange 1 45 45 50 2250 11250 Five Year 3 Apple 1 18 18 70 1260 18900 Fifteen Year 4 Aarou 1 30 30 20 600 3000 Five Year 5 Nibuwa 1 55 55 20 1100 5500 Five Year 6 Nibuwa 1 60 60 20 1200 6000 Five Year 7 Chiouri 1 45 45 10 450 6750 Fifteen Year Total 19 - - - - 54000 -
147
Annex - 8: Compensation Cost for the Loss of Crops
148
Annex 8: Cost Estimate for Loss of Crops
Land to be Affacted Average Average Rate Per Value of Transport Total S.No. Crops Type Acquired Land Area Yield Per Production kg (NRs) Produced Cost Per kg Transport Total (sq.m)[a] (ha)[a] ha (kg)[b] (kg) [c] Crops (NRs) (NRs) [d] Cost (NRs)
1 Millet 30000 3.00 10,096 9846.973 30.00 295409.19 5 49234.865 344644.055
2 Potato 22000 2.2 7221.114 3282.324 35.00 114881.3 5 16411.62 131292.92
3 Maize 95000 9.50 31191.737 3283.340 16.00 52533.44 5 16416.7 16416.7
Total 147000 14.7 16411.621 462823.93 82063.185 492353.675
Note: [a] GoN, Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture (2007/2008)]
[b] GoN, Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, Annual Report on Agriculture Development & Statistics (2007/2008)
149
Annex - 9: Cost Estimate for RP Implementation
150
Annex-9: Resettlement Plan Implementation Cost
Estimated S.N. Description of Tasks Quantity Rate (NRs.) Costs (NRs.) Information dissemination about the project, 1 resettlement impacts, and compensation 1 150,000 150,000 provision Organizing CDC meeting and follow up 2 6 15,000 90,000 activities Organizing GRC meetings and follow-up 3 10 10,000 100,000 activities Establishing Sub-local level committees and 4 their mobilization (@NRs.15,000 per 8 15,000 120,000 committee) Public notification of Affected assets and 5 invitation to receive compensation (@ NRs. 4 150,000 600,000 150,000) Surveyor/Amin Mobilization for Field 6 Verification and Deed Transfor (NRs. 60,000 6 60,000 360,000 Per Manmonth)
7 Sub-total (1-5) - - 1,060,000
8 Contingency 10% - 106,000
Grand Total 1,166,000
151
Annex - 10: ToR for External Monitoring Agency
152
GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF PHYSICAL PLANNING, WORKS & TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ROADS Project Directorate (ADB)
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR
EXTERNAL MONITORING
Department of Roads Project Directorate (ADB) Consulting Services for SASEC Road Connectivity Project (SRCP) for ADB Grant...... Loan...... NEPAL
August, 2012
153
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE EXTERNAL MONITORING OF THE RESETTLEMENT PLAN A. OBJECTIVESOFTHEASSIGNMENTS The objective of the external monitoring is to conduct ongoing monitoring of the resettlement efforts of the Executing Agency/Implementing Agency and verify successful completion of resettlement activities. The Transport Project Preparatory Facility (TPPF) Project has a Resettlement Plan that integrates the land acquisition and compensation activities and the implementation of construction/ rehabilitation with support to the affected families. The project will be implemented in 7 sub-projectroads by DoR assisted by the Designand Support Consultants.The Independent External Monitor will work with the DSC to design and implement the Resettlement Plan. The ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 will be the basis for monitoring and this will be undertaken by a national independent or external monitor based in any part of the country, willing to travel to all the road components. The External Monitor will deploy a Resettlement Consultant/ Specialist as Team Leader/ External Monitor experienced in Resettlement issues to liaise with DoR and the DSC/ Resettlement Consultants in charge and who will be responsible for undertaking the resettlement monitoring surveys and reporting to DoR/ADB. The External monitor/independent scholar will provide office space for the work within its own offices with its own dedicated office equipment andcomputer/printer, etc. Selection Criteria: • Registration in District administration office or in ADB CMS. • Register in PAN • Current experience in resettlement is essential. • Preference will be given to those already working in resettlement in road projects. • A single External Monitoring to undertake all activities on each of the 7 road section projects is preferred.
B. SCOPE OF WORK-GENERAL • To review and verify the progress in resettlement implementation as outlined in the RP; • To monitor the effectiveness and efficiency of the Implementing Agency and the DSC in RP implementation; • To assess whether the resettlement objectives, particularly livelihoods and living standard so fthe Displaced Persons (DPs) have been restored or enhanced; • To assess resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability, drawing on policy and practices and to suggest corrective measures, if required.
154
C. SCOPE OF WORK - SPECIFIC The major tasks expected from the external monitor are: The External monitor will visit each road section when payment of compensation and resettlement have been completed and review the results of internal resettlement monitoring. Verification will be assessed through random checking of 10% affected households at field level to assess whether land acquisition/ resettlement objectives have generally been met. The External Monitor will involve the affected people and community groups in assessing the impact of land acquisition for monitoring and evaluation purposes through participatory community meetings. . Identify the strengths and weaknesses of the land acquisition/ resettlement objectives and approaches, implementation strategies. To review and verify progress in land acquisition/ resettlement implementation of the projects on a sample basis and prepare bi-annual reports for the DoR, Government of Nepal and the ADB after the commencement of construction. To assess the effectiveness and results achieved for livelihood restoration programme and house rebuilding sites. To liaise with the DSC over monitoring activities and review the effectiveness of the DSC in resettlement implementation. To monitor and evaluate implementation of Resettlement Plan once in a six month period and provide feedback to the Executive Agency/Implementing Agency.
D. OUTPUTS
The independent External Monitor will visit each road section as it nears completion to verify internal reports, check delivery the entitlement matrix and compile a Monitoring Report on: • Payment of compensation and timing; • Land readjustment or facilitate to arrange new land • Relocated house construction; • Training • Enterprise relocation, compensation and its adequacy; and • Payment of Allowances. • For each category, how the entitlements were used and their impact and adequacy to meet the specified objectives of the RP. • The sufficiency of entitlements vis-à-vis the RP, to restore livelihoods.
The Monitoring Report is to be written to the prescribed format. It will describe whether involuntary resettlement has been successfully implemented (a) in accordance with the RP, and (b) in accordance with the stated policy of both ADB Safeguard Policy 2009 and DoR. The independent External Monitor is required to describe any outstanding actions that are required to bring the resettlement activities in line with the policy and the RP, describe further mitigation measures needed to meet the needs of any affected person or families judged and/or perceiving themselves to be worse off as a result of the Project. The monitoring r eport must also provide a timetable and define budget requirements for any supplementary mitigation measures and detail the process of compliance monitoring and final "signing off" for these DPs. It must also describe any
155 lessons learned that might be useful in developing the new national resettlement policy and legal/institutional framework for involuntary resettlement. The External Monitor must make two further monitoring visits to each road section to assess ongoing progress and produce a monitoring report for each assessment in years 2 and 4 following award of contracts. These visits will coordinate with the DSC internal monitoring activities with DPs and involve special attention to monitoring impacts on women DPs and other vulnerable groups of D Ps. A Monitoring Report will be produced for each visit. The independent monitoring agency/ independent scholar will be responsible for overall monitoring of the EA/IA and will submit reports direct to the ADB and determine whether resettlement goals have been achieved, whether livelihoods and living standards have been restored/ enhanced and suggest recommendations for improvement.
E. TEAM COMPOSITION AND QUALIFICATIONS
In order to complete above tasks, the following staff have been proposed.
• Team Leader 1 Nos (Intermittent, on as and when required basis) • Supervisor 2 Nos (Intermittent, on as and when required basis) • Enumerators 2 Nos (Intermittent, on as and when required basis)
The monitoring agency will have significant experience in resettlement policy analysis and work experience and familiarity with all aspects of resettlement operations would be desirable. The monitoring agency will deploy a team consisting of a Team Leader as Monitor with at least master degree in sociology, anthropology or o t h e r social development studies, and who must have 5 years experience of resettlement in Nepal. The External Monitor Team Leader/ Monitor will require the assistance of an experienced survey supervisor and deploy up to two enumerators as required for each verification/ monitoring survey. The qualification of supervisor shall have at least proficiency certificate level and 3 years experience in resettlement survey. The enumerators shall have at least School Leaving Certificate (SLC) pass and s/he shall be stationed at site. Interested agencies/ consultants are a d v i s e d to contact the Resettlement Consultants of TPPF to discuss the scope of works before submission of the proposal for the work. The proposal should contain a brief statement of the approach, methodology, and relevant information concerning previous experience on monitoring of resettlement implementation and preparation of reports. The profile of the agency along with full CVs of Team Leader/ Monitor to be engaged must be submitted along with the proposal. The agency must be an established organization registered with the Government of Nepal.
156
F. BUDGET AND LOGISTICS
Three copies of the proposal both technical and financial – should be submitted and the budget should include all costs and any logistics details necessary for resettlement monitoring. Additional expense claims whatsoever outside the budget will not be entertained. .Cost Estimate for External Monitoring and Evaluation
S.N. Items Rate (NRs per Duration Total month) (months) Amount (NRs.)
1 Independent Monitoring 150,000 6 900,000 Expert (Team Leader)
2 Survey Supervisor 50,000 6 300,000
3 Enumerators (2) 20,000 10 200,000
4 Field Allowance LS LS 100,000
5 Vehicle LS LS 100,000
6 Stationeries LS LS 50,000
Total 1,650,000
Contingency 165,000
Total NRs. 1,815,000
US $ @ 90 app. 20,000
157
Annex - 11: Field Photographs of Census Survey
158
Affected Structure of Purna Shaova Dargi, Nunthala-2, Affected Structure of Bishnu Maya Tamang, Nunthala- Nunthala 9, Bhanjyang
Participation s in Public Consultation at Nunthala - Affected Structure of Laxman Subedi.Salle-8, Nagi 2,Nunthala
Affected Structure of Mahan Bahadur Karki at Diktel – 2. Affected Public Structure at Nunthala – 9, Bhanjyang Buspark
159
Affected Structure of Sudar Singh Katuwal, Bamrang-9 Cadastral Surveyor during the side verification and inventory of Affected Assets at Diktel – 2
Recording the Census Survey with DP’s at Bamrang – 9, Affected Structures at Salle 8 – Nagi. Karagar Bazzar.
Affected Structures at Nunthala – 9, Bhanjyang Cadasteral Survey at Salle-8, Nagi
160
Cadestral Surveyor and LocalPeople during site verification Land Ownereship Certificate of Affected Assets of Sandip and Inventory of Affected Assets at Diktel, Hurlung. Rai, Diktel
Affected Structures of Mohan Bahadur Karki at Diktel – 2. Affected Structure of Dafuri Sherpa at Diktel – 6
Participants at public consultations at Arkhaule 2, Arkhaule Cadastral Survey by Surveyor at Arkhaule, Kamidanda Bazzar.
161
Annex-12: Sample of Cadastral Map with Road Alignment
162