DOCSLIB.ORG

Mayors for Peace Network

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EDI N BVRG H THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL Mayors for Peace Network City of Edinburgh Council 15 September 2005 Purpose of report 1 To consider the decision ol the Executive o 23 August 2005 on the Mayors for Peace Network. Main report 2 At its meeting on 23 August 2005 the Executive considered a report by the Chief Executive on an invitation to the Council to join the Mayors for Peace Network and to endorse the Network’s statement on non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. 3 The Executive agreed that the Council become a member of the Mayors for Peace Network and indicate its support for the Network’s statement. 4 The Executive’s decision has been called in to the Council in terms of Standing Order 58. The lead signatory is Councillor Mclnnes. Recommendations 5 That the Council consider the Executive’s decision. 1,9 05 Appendices Report no E/I52/05-06/CE by the Chief Executive Contactltel C Riley 529 4830 Wards affected City Wide Background Minute of the Executive of 23 August 2005 Papers 1 Item no + GDINBVRGH + THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL Mayors for Peace Network Executive of the Council 23 August 2005 Purpose of report 1 This report is submitted in terms of the decision of the Council on 30 June 2005 that I report on the remaining issues in relation to the invitation to the Council to join the Mayors for Peace Network. Main report The Council had been advised that attendance at the annual conference of the Mayors for Peace Network, which took place in Hiroshima, Japan from 4 to 6 August, was no longer being considered. The previous decision by the Executive, at its meeting on 21 June, had been called in to the Council in terms of Standing Order 58 but, in light of that position, the call-in was subsequently withdrawn at the Council meeting. The remaining issues on which I was asked to report are: i. whether the Council should become a member of the Mayors for Peace Network; and ii. whether the Council should sign the statement at Appendix 1 to this report. Mayors for Peace is an international non-governmental organisation recognised under the United Nations Charter. As at April this year, it comprised 912 cities from 1IO countries and territories which support the Program to Promote the Solidarity of Cities Toward the Total Abolition of Nuclear Weapons, proposed by the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in June 1982 at the Second UN Session on Disarmament. The Network seeks to build solidarity and co-operation among cities and to contribute to world peace, primarily by raising global public consciousness regarding the abolition of nuclear weapons. It also seeks to address collectively the many problems that threaten peaceful co-existence, including hunger, poverty, human rights abuses, local conflict and environmental destruction. While almost 30 UK councils are members of Mayors for Peace, Glasgow and Shetland Islands Councils are the only Scottish members at present and, against the background of growing Edinburgh/Glasgow co-operation, it may be appropriate for this Council now to become a member of the Network. It may, however, be too late for the Council formally to endorse the statement at 1 Appendix 1, since the objective was to release this to the media at the United Nations on 23 May 2005, although the Council could still indicate its support for the sentiments of the statement. Financial Implications 7 As previously reported, membership of the Mayors for Peace Network involves no annual fee or financial obligation. Recommendations 8 The Executive is recommended to agree that the Council become a member of the Mayors for Peace Network and indicate its support for the statement at Appendix 1. Tom Aitchison Chief Executive +$/-/x Appendices Appendix 1 Statement and Signatories Contactltel Tom Aitchison/Deirdre Wynn 469 3002/469 301 1 Wards affected All Background Report to Executive of 21 June 2005 Papers Report to Council of 30 June 2005 2 Joint Statement Page 1 of 8 Mayors and parliamentarians cooperate for a nuclear weapons free world The following statement was released by mayors and members ofparliaments and congresses, meeting in conjunction with the 7thReview Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons in May 2005, and has been endorsed by the mayors aizd national legislators listed below: Statement As mayors and legislators we have a role to protect the security of citizens living within our jurisdictions and to protect our localities for future generations. Such security is not advanced when there remain 30,000 nuclear weapons, many of which are deployed and ready for use at short notice. The risk of nuclear weapons use - by accident, design or miscalculation ? is increasing due to the proliferation of nuclear weapons to new States, the possibility of non-State access to nuclear weapons and bomb-building materials, and the expanded nuclear weapons use doctrines of the nuclear weapon States. Regardless of where nuclear weapons are targeted or detonated, or whether they are used by terrorist organisations or State militaries, no-one would escape the calamitous consequences of a nuclear attack. Even cities that are not the direct brunt of an attack would feel the global economic, social and medical repercussions, which would dwarf those of 9/11. Any nuclear weapons use would cause unimaginable devastation requiring massive aid, global effects from nuclear fall-out and a rise in refugees seeking to escape the most contaminated regions. The only way to prevent nuclear weapons use is to eliminate all nuclear weapons as mandated by Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the 1996 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. Mayors for Peace have provided a vision for the achievement of a nuclear weapons free world by 2020. Therefore, we the undersigned mayors and parliamentarians, call for the commencement of negotiations which would culminate in the comprehensive abolition and elimination of nuclear weapons and the international control of nuclear materials to prevent clandestine bomb-making. If a small number of States continue to prevent such negotiations being initiated at the Conference on Disarmament and also at the NPT Review Conferences, then governments should be encouraged to find an alternative track to nuclear disarmament as was done with the Landmines Convention. The overwhelming majority of citizens in our cities, countries and around the world support the abolition of these ultimate weapons of mass destruction, and we mayors and legislators have a responsibility to use our authority to ensure the implementation of this imperative. http:liwwv.pcf. cin..hiroshima.jp ~mayorslengIish’canipaign$ointstatement.htm1 08,/0 8 ’3 0 05 Joint Statement Page 3 of 8 Endorsers: Tadatoshi Akiba, Mayor of Hiroshima, Japan Yzermans Alain, Mayor of Houthalen-Helchteren, Belgium Senator Lyn Allison, Australia Senator Abacca Anjain-Maddison, Marshall Islands Hon. Larry Bagnell, P.C. M.P, Canada Chris Balance MSP, Scotland Tim Barnett Mp, New Zealand Senator Andrew Bartlett, Australia Angelika Beer, Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Eddie de Bloack, Mayor, Merchtem, Belgium Senator Stefan0 BOCO,Italy Hartmut Bopp, Mayor of Aarbergen, Germany Rosa Maria Bonas i Pahisa MP, Spain Senator Massimo Bonavita, Italy Jozef de Borger, Mayor Gemeente Londerzeel, Belgium Hiltrud Breyer MdEP Dr Andre Brie, MEP Senator Bob Brown, Australia Dr. Charles Yaw Brempong-Yeboah MP, Ghana Senator Giovanni Brunale, Italy Senator Paolo Brutti, Italy Jim Burch, Mayor of Palo Alto, California, USA Raphael Chegeni MP, Tanzania Arthur Chesterfield Evans MP, Australia Keiko Chiba MP, Japan Senator Nando Dalla Chiesa, Italy David N. Cicilline Mayor of Providence, USA Dave Cieslewicz, Mayor of Madison, USA http:lhuu-.pcf.city .hiroshima,jp/mayors/en,olish/campaign~ ointstatement.htm1 08 '0 8'2 00 5 ~ Joint Statement Page 4 of 8 Ian Cohen MP, Australia Frank Cook MP, United Kingdom Raffaele Cortesi, Mayor of Lug0 (Ra) Italy Senator Fiorello Cortiana, Italy Libby Davies MP, Canada Luc Dehaene, Mayor of Ieper, Belgium Elettra Deiana Mp, Italy Roe1 Deseyn, MP, Belgium Senator Anna Donati, Italy Vera Dua, MP, Belgium Jill Evans MEP Hans Eyssen, Mayor Holsbeek, Belgium Senator Antonello Falomi, Italy Senator Angelo Flammia, Italy Pietro Folena MP, Italy Daniel Fontaine, Mayor of Aubagne, France Deb Foskey MP, Australia Monica Frassoni, Member of the European Parliament Antonelle Friestein, Representing the Mayor of Viorglio, Italy Senator Pierre Galand, Belgium Eloi Glorieux MP, Belgium Senator Leopoldo Di Girolamo, Italy Councillor Brian Gregson, for the Convener, Shetland Islands Council Senator Brian Greig, Australia Paul Van Grembergen, Mayor Evergem, Belgium Edith Cuttat Gyger, Municipalite de Delemont Sylvia Hale MP, Australia David Hammerstein MEP Agne Hansson MP, Sweden http :/'v\u?~-.pcf.cin-.ltiroshima.jp;ma~ors'en,olish/campai-~ijointstatement.htm1 08/0 8/2 0 0 5 J oint 3; tatement Page 5 of 8 Rebecca Harms MEP Satu Hassi, MEP Lotta Hedstrom MP, Sweden Heide Ruehle MEP RogerHeyvaert, Mayor of Meise, Belgium David T. Hildt, Mayor of Amesbury, Massachusetts, USA Alain Hutchinson MEP Satoshi Inoue MP, Japan Tadashi Inuzuka MP, Japan Senator Nuccio Iovene, Italy Marie Anne Isler Beguin, MEP Patrick Janssens Mayor, Belgium Jenny Jones, Representing the Mayor of London Gisela Kallenbach MEP Sandra Kanck, Australia Seiichi Kaneta, MP, Japan Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann MEP Sergey Kolesnikov MY, Russia Dirk de Kort, Mayor of Brasschaat, Belgium Rep Dennis
Recommended publications
  • Aalst Geel Lubbeek Stabroek Aalter Geraardsbergen Lummen STADEN

    Aalst Geel Lubbeek Stabroek Aalter Geraardsbergen Lummen STADEN

    Aalst Geel Lubbeek Stabroek Aalter Geraardsbergen Lummen STADEN Aartselaar Grimbergen Maaseik Steenokkerzeel Alken Haacht Maldegem Temse Alveringem Hamme Mechelen Tervuren Anzegem Hamont-Achel Meerhout Tessenderlo Arendonk Harelbeke Meeuwen - Gruitrode Tielt-Winge As Hasselt Meise Tienen Assenede Heers Melle Tongeren Baarle-Hertog Heist-op-den-Berg Merchtem Tremelo Beerse Herent Merelbeke Veurne Beersel Herenthout Merksplas Vorselaar Bekkevoort Herk-de-Stad Meulebeke Vosselaar BERINGEN Herne Moerbeke Waarschoot Berlare Herzele Mol Waasmunster Bertem Hoegaarden Moorslede Wachtebeke BEVER Holsbeek Nazareth Wellen Beveren Hooglede Niel Wemmel Bierbeek Horebeke Nieuwerkerken Westerlo Bilzen Houthalen-Helchteren Nieuwpoort Wetteren Bocholt Houthulst Nijlen Wichelen Boechout Hove Ninove Wielsbeke Bonheiden Ieper Olen Willebroek Boom Ingelmunster Oosterzele Wingene Boortmeerbeek Izegem Opglabbeek Wommelgem Borgloon Kalmthout Oudenaarde Wortegem-Petegem Bornem Kapellen Oudenburg Wuustwezel Boutersem Kapelle-op-den-Bos Oud-Heverlee Zandhoven Brakel KASTERLEE Oud-Turnhout Zaventem Brecht knokke-heist Overijse Zedelgem Bree Koksijde Overpelt Zele BRUGGE Kontich Pittem Zelzate Buggenhout Kortenberg poperinge Zemst Damme Kortrijk Putte Zoersel De Pinte Kraainem Puurs Zonhoven Deinze Kruibeke Ranst Zottegem Dendermonde Kuurne Ravels Zulte Dessel Laakdal Riemst Zwalm Destelbergen Laarne Ronse ZWEVEGEM Diepenbeek Lanaken Ruiselede Zwijndrecht Diksmuide Landen Schelle Hoogstraten Dilbeek Langemark-Poelkapelle Schoten Genk Dilsen-Stokkem Lendelede Sint-Amands Kinrooi Drogenbos Lennik Sint-Gillis-Waas Neerpelt Duffel Liedekerke Sint-Laureins Herenthals Eeklo Lier Sint-Lievens-Houtem Balen Erpe-Mere Lille Sint-Martens-Latem Herselt Essen Linkebeek Sint-Niklaas Evergem Lint Sint-Pieters-Leeuw Galmaarden Lochristi Spiere-Helkijn.
  • Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Commission

    Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Commission

    Submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee into The Needs of Urban* Dwelling Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples By the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission October 2000 * Population centres of more than 1000 people and includes peoples living in or near country towns of this size. Contents Executive Summary 3 Involvement in Decision Making 11 Maintenance of Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights 20 Education, Training, Employment & Opportunities for 26 Economic Independence Indigenous Health Needs 40 Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Youth 52 Mainland Torres Strait Islander Issues 69 The Role of Other Agencies & Spheres of Government 75 ATSIC Programs & Services 110 Statistical Overview 189 Acronyms & Abbreviations 204 References & Bibliography 207 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The role of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission was established in 1990 to be the main Commonwealth agency in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander affairs. Our Act gives us a variety of functions including the responsibility to: • develop policy proposals to meet national, State, Territory and regional needs and priorities, • advise the Minister on legislation, and coordination of activities of other Commonwealth bodies, • protect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural material and information, and • formulate and implement programs. In exercising these responsibilities ATSIC has given Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders a stronger political voice. On the one hand, the most prominent Indigenous agency, ATSIC is often blamed for the fact that our people remain gravely disadvantaged. On the other hand it is not widely understood that ATSIC’s budget is meant to supplement the funding provided by the Government to other Commonwealth, State, Territory and Local Government agencies.
  • Feiten En Cijfers Jaarverslag

    Feiten En Cijfers Jaarverslag

    JAARVERSLAG 2019 REGIONAAL LANDSCHAP NOORD-HAGELAND REGIONALE LANDSCHAPPEN IN VLAANDEREN FEITEN EN CIJFERS JAARVERSLAG Kengetallen Regionaal Landschap Noord -Hageland vzw (2019) 16 Regionale Landschappen in Vlaanderen behouden 2019 en versterken natuur, landschap, erfgoed, streekiden- Oppervlakte (km2) 414 titeit en recreatie. We brengen inwoners, verenigingen Aantal inwoners 173.359 en overheden samen rond een wervend streekverhaal Inwoners / ha 4.19 dat inspireert en voor verbondenheid zorgt. Aantal betrokken gemeenten 11 R e g i o n a l e L a n d s c h a p p e n w e r k e n i n t e g r a a l . Effectieve leden vzw 41 In onze cultuurlandschappen hebben zowel natuur als Personeelsleden vzw (Voltijdse Equiv.) 8.1 mens gedurende eeuwen hun invloed uitgeoefend. Jaaromzet vzw (Euro) 779.560 Het is deze vergroeiing die Regionale Landschappen koesteren. We kijken daarbij steeds graag over de muurtjes heen. VARIATIE TROEF LANDSCHAPSZORG EN LEVE DE TUIN EDUCATIE EN VORMING STREEKEIGEN KARAKTER Het Regionaal Landschap Noord-Hageland ligt op de 86% van de Vlaams-Brabanders heeft een tuin. Het Onbekend is onbemind. Een thematische overgang van de zandige Kempen in het noorden naar Een Regionaal Landschap is een streek met een eigen Regionaal Landschap Noord-Hageland wil samen met wandeling of met de school een bijenhotel maken. Er de meer lemige bodems van Haspengouw. identiteit en met belangrijke natuur- en landschaps- de provincie Vlaams-Brabant daar één groot groen is een waaier aan mogelijkheden voor jong en oud om De variatie van ijzerzandsteenheuvels en de rivier- waarden. Het is een van onze kerntaken om dit paradijs van maken.
  • The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett*

    The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett*

    Australian Cultural History Vol. 27, No.2, October 2009, 187-193 The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett* The Australian Democrats had maintained a presence in the Senate since 1977, but the 2007 election threatened to end their representation for good. Their efforts to retain seats proved to be in vain. Keywords: 2007 election; Australian Democrats; Senate Following on from the 2004 election, where the Australian Democrats lost four seats (including the Democrat seat Meg Lees had taken with her when she resigned from the party in 2002), plus official parliamentary status and balance of power in the Senate, the Party faced a very difficult task in the 2007 election trying to keep its four remaining Senate seats. Right throughout John Howard's fourth term, opinion polls showed public support for the Democrats consistently scraping along rock bottom levels of 1 or 2 per cent, as they had ever since the Lees resignation and the related public implosion of Natasha Stott Despoja's leadership in 2002. Even though the removal of the Democrats from the balance of power after the 2004 poll led directly to the Coalition government gaining control of the Senate, where it frequently used its majority to stifle scrutiny and bulldoze through some controversial legislation, the Democrats were unable to use this situation to build public support for returning the Party to its traditional Senate watchdog position. The Party had avoided going into debt in its 2004 campaign, so there were sufficient funds to run a basic campaign in priority areas for the 2007 election. However, serious use of paid advertising was not feasible.
  • 1 Parliamentary Privilege and the Common Law of Parliament

    1 Parliamentary Privilege and the Common Law of Parliament

    Parliamentary privilege and the common law of parliament: can MP’s say what they want and get away with it? Carren Walker1 Introduction Parliamentary privilege can be broadly defined as the powers, rights and immunities of parliament and its members. The privileges enjoyed by the parliament are linked historically to the privileges of the UK House of Commons which have their origin in the procedures of the Parliament of Westminster: ..to be found chiefly in ancient practice, asserted by Parliament and accepted over time by the Crown and the courts of law and custom of Parliament.2 The privileges of parliament are defined by the rulings of each House in respect of its own practices and procedures when a matter of privilege arises. The use of the terms ‘history’, ‘procedure’, and ‘tradition’ give the impression of uncertainty, and make those in the legal profession feel most uneasy. The legal world is inhibited by statute, rules, forms and precedent, surrounded by the cocoon of the common law as developed by the courts. Parliamentary privilege and the development of the common law of parliament is based on different principles to those of the common law as developed by the courts. It certainly bears little resemblance in its form and structure to legal professional privilege. The privileges of parliament have changed over time, some are simply not relevant in our modern parliamentary democracy (such as freedom of members from arrest), others (such as the power to detain a person in breach of the privilege) have fallen out of use. These privileges tend to develop as the need arises in a particular House.
  • Geografische Indicatoren (Gebaseerd Op Census 2011) De Referentiedatum Van De Census Is 01/01/2011

    Geografische Indicatoren (Gebaseerd Op Census 2011) De Referentiedatum Van De Census Is 01/01/2011

    Geografische indicatoren (gebaseerd op Census 2011) De referentiedatum van de Census is 01/01/2011. Filters: Bevolking met diploma hoger onderwijs België Gewest Provincie Arrondissement Gemeente Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest Arrondissement Brussel-Hoofdstad Sint-Pieters-Woluwe 55.86% Waals Gewest Provincie Waals-Brabant Arrondissement Nijvel Lasne 53.24% Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen Arrondissement Gent Sint-Martens-Latem 52.06% Wezembeek-Oppem 52.03% Vlaams Gewest Arrondissement Halle-Vilvoorde Provincie Vlaams-Brabant Kraainem 51.93% Arrondissement Leuven Oud-Heverlee 50.14% Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest Arrondissement Brussel-Hoofdstad Elsene 50.04% Vlaams Gewest Provincie Vlaams-Brabant Arrondissement Leuven Leuven 49.92% Waals Gewest Provincie Waals-Brabant Arrondissement Nijvel Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve 49.90% Watermaal-Bosvoorde 48.96% Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest Arrondissement Brussel-Hoofdstad Ukkel 48.91% Vlaams Gewest Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen Arrondissement Gent De Pinte 48.73% Waals Gewest Provincie Waals-Brabant Arrondissement Nijvel Terhulpen 48.55% Vlaams Gewest Provincie Vlaams-Brabant Arrondissement Halle-Vilvoorde Linkebeek 48.48% Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest Arrondissement Brussel-Hoofdstad Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe 48.43% Rixensart 48.16% Waals Gewest Provincie Waals-Brabant Arrondissement Nijvel Chaumont-Gistoux 48.09% Vlaams Gewest Provincie Vlaams-Brabant Arrondissement Halle-Vilvoorde Sint-Genesius-Rode 47.86% Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest Arrondissement Brussel-Hoofdstad Oudergem 47.07% Waals Gewest Provincie
  • Belgian Beer Experiences in Flanders & Brussels

    Belgian Beer Experiences in Flanders & Brussels

    Belgian Beer Experiences IN FLANDERS & BRUSSELS 1 2 INTRODUCTION The combination of a beer tradition stretching back over Interest for Belgian beer and that ‘beer experience’ is high- centuries and the passion displayed by today’s brewers in ly topical, with Tourism VISITFLANDERS regularly receiving their search for the perfect beer have made Belgium the questions and inquiries regarding beer and how it can be home of exceptional beers, unique in character and pro- best experienced. Not wanting to leave these unanswered, duced on the basis of an innovative knowledge of brew- we have compiled a regularly updated ‘trade’ brochure full ing. It therefore comes as no surprise that Belgian brew- of information for tour organisers. We plan to provide fur- ers regularly sweep the board at major international beer ther information in the form of more in-depth texts on competitions. certain subjects. 3 4 In this brochure you will find information on the following subjects: 6 A brief history of Belgian beer ............................. 6 Presentations of Belgian Beers............................. 8 What makes Belgian beers so unique? ................12 Beer and Flanders as a destination ....................14 List of breweries in Flanders and Brussels offering guided tours for groups .......................18 8 12 List of beer museums in Flanders and Brussels offering guided tours .......................................... 36 Pubs ..................................................................... 43 Restaurants .........................................................47 Guided tours ........................................................51 List of the main beer events in Flanders and Brussels ......................................... 58 Facts & Figures .................................................... 62 18 We hope that this brochure helps you in putting together your tours. Anything missing? Any comments? 36 43 Contact your Trade Manager, contact details on back cover.
  • Hard Shoulder Running E40 and Weaving Segments E314

    Hard Shoulder Running E40 and Weaving Segments E314

    Arc Atlantique Traffic Management Corridor Annex 1 Evaluation reports www.easyway-its.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FL-01: Hard shoulder running E40 and weaving segments E314 2. FL-02: Hard shoulder running E19 Kleine Bareel – St.-Job-in-‘t-Goor 3. WL-03: Management and transit traffic on Walloon motorways 4. FR-05: Intelligent Truck Parking 5. FR-16: Traffic Management Plans 6. IE-01: MIU ITS Deployment 7. NL-01: Field test Amsterdam 8. PT-..: Monitoring Enhancement on critical segments – to be delivered 9. PT-03: System Enhancements 10. E01: AG-64 Traffic Control and Traffic Management ITS deployment 11. E02: AG-55 Traffic Control and Traffic Management ITS deployment 12. ES-20: Floating Car Data use 13. ES-21: Analysis and evaluation of different traffic management strategies in order to reduce the congestions in Bilbao peri-urban area 14. UK 02: M25 J 5 – 7 Variable Speed Limit, All lane Running / Hard Shoulder Running 15. UK 03: M25 J 23 – 27 Variable Speed Limit, All lane Running / Hard Shoulder Running 16. UK ..: Welsh National Traffic Data System – to be delivered Arc Atlantique Evaluation report – Annex 1 2/2 Hard Shoulder Running and Weaving Segments Belgium –E40/E314 – Brussel - Aken Project Reference: FL-01 Project Name: Hard shoulder running E40 and weaving segments E314 ITS Corridor: E40/E314 Brussel - Aken Project Location: Belgium – E40/E314 Leuven Area 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM ADDRESSED BY THE PROJECT 1.1 Nature of the Site The R0, E40 and E314 in this report are part of a highway connection between the cities of Brussels-Lummen (E314), and Brussels-Luik (E40).
  • Aliments Pour Animaux 1/09/2021 BE

    Aliments Pour Animaux 1/09/2021 BE

    Animal feed - Diervoedersector - Aliments pour animaux 1/09/2021 BE Erkenning / Agrément / Approval 8.1 Establishment for the manufactoring and/or the placing on the market of additives - Inrichting voor de vervaardiging en/of het in de handel brengen van additieven - Etablissement pour la fabrication et/ou la mise sur le marché d'additifs Approval number Approvel date Name Contact details Remarks Erkenningsnummer Erkenningsdatum Naam Contactgegevens Opmerking Numéro de l'agrément Date de l'agrément Nom Coordonnées Observations aBE2163 01/01/2006 ABERGAVENNY Wiekevorstsesteenweg 38 2220 Heist-op-den-Berg aBE2263 24/01/2012 ADDI-TECH Industriepark-Noord 18/19 9100 Sint-Niklaas aBE4013 14/02/2012 ALFRA SOCIETE ANONYME Rue du Onze Novembre 34 4460 Grâce-Hollogne aBE101277 22/06/2011 ALIA 2 Rue Riverre 105 5150 Floreffe aBE102489 24/04/2018 ALLTECH BELGIUM BVBA Klerkenstraat 92 - 94 8650 Houthulst aBE105183 01/07/2020 Artechno Rue Sainte Eugénie(TAM) 40 5060 Sambreville aBE102987 01/07/2020 ARTECHNO Rue Herman Meganck,Isnes 21 5032 Gembloux aBE2006 21/04/2010 Aveve Venecolaan 22 9880 Aalter aBE2011 01/01/2011 AVEVE Eugeen Meeusstraat 6 2170 Merksem aBE100428 12/02/2014 AVEVE BIOCHEM Eugeen Meeusstraat 6 2170 Merksem aBE103305 26/08/2015 Axo Industry International Chaussée de Louvain 249 1300 Wavre aBE103064 15/07/2021 AZELIS BENELUX Verlorenbroodstraat 120 9820 Merelbeke aBE45 01/01/2019 BASF Belgium Coordination Center Comm.V. Drève Richelle 161 E b 43 1410 Waterloo aBE2309 01/01/2006 BBCA BELGIUM Hoeikensstraat 2 2830 Willebroek aBE2038
  • Inquiry Into Government Advertising and Accountability with Amendments to Term of Reference (A)

    Inquiry Into Government Advertising and Accountability with Amendments to Term of Reference (A)

    The Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee Government advertising and accountability December 2005 © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 ISBN 0 642 71593 9 This document is prepared by the Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. Members of the Committee Senator Michael Forshaw (Chair) ALP, NSW Senator John Watson (Deputy Chair) LP, TAS Senator Carol Brown ALP, TAS Senator Mitch Fifield LP, NSW Senator Claire Moore ALP, QLD Senator Andrew Murray AD, WA Substitute member for this inquiry Senator Kim Carr ALP, VIC (replaced Senator Claire Moore from 22 June 2005) Former substitute member for this inquiry Senator Andrew Murray AD, WA (replaced Senator Aden Ridgeway 30 November 2004 to 30 June 2005) Former members Senator George Campbell (discharged 1 July 2005) Senator the Hon William Heffernan (discharged 1 July 2005) Senator Aden Ridgeway (until 30 June 2005) Senator Ursula Stephens (1 July to 13 September 2005) Participating members Senators Abetz, Bartlett, Bishop, Boswell, Brandis, Bob Brown, Carr, Chapman, Colbeck, Conroy, Coonan, Crossin, Eggleston, Evans, Faulkner, Ferguson, Ferris, Fielding, Fierravanti-Wells, Joyce, Ludwig, Lundy, Sandy Macdonald, Mason, McGauran, McLucas, Milne, Moore, O'Brien, Parry, Payne, Ray, Sherry, Siewert, Stephens, Trood and Webber. Secretariat Alistair Sands Committee Secretary Sarah Bachelard Principal Research Officer Matt Keele Research Officer Alex Hodgson Executive Assistant Committee address Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee SG.60 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6277 3530 Fax: 02 6277 5809 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate_fpa iii iv Terms of Reference On 18 November 2004, the Senate referred the following matter to the Finance and Public Administration References Committee for inquiry and report by 22 June 2005.
  • Sir Walter Murdoch Memorial Lecture (1999)

    Sir Walter Murdoch Memorial Lecture (1999)

    Sir Walter Murdoch Memorial Lecture (1999) Millennium Dreaming: Indigenous Peoples in Australia in the era of Reconciliation Lecture delivered by: Senator Aden Ridgeway, 17 November 1999 This is the University’s premier Lecture, inaugurated in 1974, to mark the centenary of the birth of Sir Walter Murdoch, after whom the University was named. Sir Walter was the foundation Professor of English at the University of Western Australia from 1913 to 1939, and a prolific journalist whose newspaper columns were known for their shrewdness, for their clarity of thought and writing, and their propensity to deflate pomposity and humbug. He was a man who eschewed cant, a man of immense principle, and I think he would have been proud of tonight’s speaker. In the past few months, Senator Aden Ridgeway’s name has become one of the best–known in the nation. It has been said to me that he had burst onto the national political scene like a comet. But he won’t be ephemeral like a comet. There is too much substance, too much determination and commitment for him to fade away. It is given to very few Parliamentarians to play a pivotal role in a matter as weighty as reconciliation within weeks of being entering the Parliament, and to even fewer to achieve this from the upper house as a member of a minority party. But the style and strength of purpose which Senator Ridgeway displayed in persuading the Prime Minister to a point which few thought could be reached, speaks clearly for his ability and bodes well for his longevity in politics.
  • Art. M5. Bijlage 1. Gerechtelijke Wetboek (Territoriale Grenzen)

    Art. M5. Bijlage 1. Gerechtelijke Wetboek (Territoriale Grenzen)

    art. M5. bijlage 1. Gerechtelijke wetboek (territoriale grenzen) Art. M5. [1 Afdeling 5. - Provincie Vlaams-Brabant 1. De gemeenten Affligem, Asse, Merchtem, Opwijk en Ternat vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Asse. 2. De stad Halle en de gemeenten Beersel, Pepingen en Sint-Pieters-Leeuw vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Halle. 3. De gemeenten Drogenbos, Kraainem, Linkebeek, Sint-Genesius-Rode en Wezembeek-Oppem vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Sint-Genesius-Rode. 4. De gemeenten Bever, Dilbeek, Galmaarden, Gooik, Herne, Lennik, Liedekerke en Roosdaal vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Lennik. 5. De gemeenten Grimbergen, Kapelle-op-den-Bos, Londerzeel, Meise en Wemmel vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Meise. 6. De gemeenten Hoeilaart, Overijse, Steenokkerzeel en Zaventem vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Zaventem. 7. De stad Vilvoorde en de gemeenten Kampenhout, Machelen en Zemst vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Vilvoorde. 8. De hierboven vermelde kantons vormen het administratief arrondissement Halle-Vilvoorde. 9. De stad Aarschot en de gemeenten Begijnendijk, Boortmeerbeek, Haacht, Keerbergen, Rotselaar en Tremelo vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Aarschot. 10. De steden Diest, Scherpenheuvel-Zichem en de gemeenten Bekkevoort en Tielt-Winge vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Diest. 11. De steden Landen, Zoutleeuw en de gemeenten Glabbeek, Geetbets, Kortenaken en Linter vormen een gerechtelijk kanton; de zetel van het gerecht is gevestigd te Zoutleeuw.