DOCSLIB.ORG

An Economic Analysis of a Total Allowable Catch-Individual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations and Theses in Agricultural Economics Agricultural Economics Department 8-2017 An Economic Analysis of a Total Allowable Catch- Individual Transferable Quota System in a Developing Country Heterogeneous Fishery: An Application to the Digha Fishery in West Bengal, India Nadeeka Weerasekara University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agecondiss Weerasekara, Nadeeka, "An Economic Analysis of a Total Allowable Catch-Individual Transferable Quota System in a Developing Country Heterogeneous Fishery: An Application to the Digha Fishery in West Bengal, India" (2017). Dissertations and Theses in Agricultural Economics. 38. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agecondiss/38 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural Economics Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses in Agricultural Economics by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH- INDIVIDUAL TRANSFERABLE QUOTA SYSTEM IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY HETEROGENEOUS FISHERY: AN APPLICATION TO THE DIGHA FISHERY IN WEST BENGAL, INDIA by Nadeeka Weerasekara A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Agricultural Economics Under the Supervision of Professor Simanti Banerjee Lincoln, Nebraska August, 2017 AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH- INDIVIDUAL TRANSFERABLE QUOTA SYSTEM IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY HETEROGENEOUS FISHERY: AN APPLICATION TO THE DIGHA FISHERY IN WEST BENGAL, INDIA Nadeeka Weerasekara, M.S. University of Nebraska, 2017 Advisor: Simanti Banerjee This thesis contributes to the literature of economics of small-scale fishery communities and fishery management in developing nations. In the first section we review literature on state of the fishery resource and the livelihoods in the globe and performance of fishery management systems in developing and developed countries. Second section discusses the results of an empirical study on the economics of subsistence fishers in Digha-Shankarpur in Eastern India. Results of the empirical study shows by-catch by the trawlers leads to the depletion of target fish stock of the subsistence fishers. Underutilization of the capacity by the subsistence fishers due to the lack of fish stock leads to income losses and inequitable profit distributions among fishers. Ultimately, lack of fish stock generates competition among subsistence fishers. Given the identified economic conditions of fishers from the survey and the literature on ecological studies, we focus on policy measures which can tackle the dual problem of resource depletion and unsustainable competitive pressures on the small-scale fishers. To this end in the third section we present a general scenario analysis concerning the welfare of industry participants when there is a well-defined rights based fishery management policy in place. To support the policy design we extensively study the Digha industry setting and the status quo management of Digha fishery. Given the heterogeneity of fishers and the segmented markets in Digha fishery and the conflicts of interests among fisher groups, we consider two TAC policy designs to regulate two segmented markets namely, trawler boat fishers and subsistence fishers. According to the scenario analysis, two TACs for subsistence and trawler boat fishers with an ITQ system is a better fit to achieve the sustainability goals of the Digha fishery. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of the TAC policy on trawlers depends on the magnitude of by-catch reduction. Also, the policy implementation is critical due to the poverty conditions in the developing countries. However, this study makes a case for policy makers and researchers to carry out an informed cost benefit analysis in implementing a TAC-ITQ policy in a developing country fishery setting. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank many individuals who supported me in many ways throughout this experience. First I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor and committee chair for giving me immense support and guidance throughout the research process and graduate school. Working with her opened many doors for me to continue my research career and graduate studies by shaping me with new experiences and opportunities. Also without her financial support I would not be able to start my graduate studies. Thank you Dr. Simanti Banerjee for all the support. I am also grateful for my committee members, Dr. Zinnia Mukherjee and Dr. Emie Yiannaka. I appreciate the support Dr. Mukherjee provided with her expertise knowledge on fishery resources and from Dr. Yiannaka for her incredible support in providing her knowledge on welfare analysis. Special thanks go to the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Global Engagement Office, University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Simmons College President’s Fund for Faculty Excellence for providing funding for the project. Sincere gratitude to Dr. Joyashree Roy, Director, Global Change Program, Jadavpur University, West Bengal, India and Dr. Duke Ghosh, Partner and Main Researcher, Global Change Research, West Bengal, India for their research support. Also I would like to acknowledge the data collection team of Digha fishery for their immense support. Thank you to Prof. Udith Jayasinghe-Mudalige, who was my supervisor in undergraduate program and a professor from Wayamba University of Sri Lanka for providing recent fishery research findings in Sri Lanka. A special thank you to my family and friends for their love, support and encouragement throughout this process. Finally, thank you to the faculty, administration, staff, and students in the Agricultural Economics department who have shared in and shaped my experience in graduate school. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................vii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................viii DEFINITION OF ABBREVIATIONS ……................................................................ix CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................1 1.1 Motivation ...............................................................................................................1 1.2 Objectives ................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW ................................8 2.1 Fishery Management in Theory and in Practice ......................................................8 2.1.1 Basic models of fisheries ................................................................................8 2.1.2 Institutions and regulations to manage fishery industry …………….……..12 2.1.2.1 Co-management ……………………………………………………12 2.1.2.2 Property rights and fisheries management ……………………...…12 2.2 Literature Review….………………………………………………………….….15 2.2.1 Case studies on biological and economical issues related to fishery....…....15 2.2.2 Evaluating fishery management practices in developing nations……..…...17 2.2.3 Evaluating fishery management practices in developed nations…………...21 CHAPTER 3: DIGHA FISHERY …………………………………………………...26 3.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………...26 3.1.1 Prevailing fishery management system in India …………………………...26 3.1.2 Prevailing fishery management system in West Bengal …………………..26 3.2 Digha Fishery ……………………………………………………………………28 3.2.1 Study site …………………………………………………………………..28 3.2.2 Market channel ……………………………………………….……………29 vi 3.2.3 Primary data collection ……………………………………………………32 3.2.4 Data analysis ………………………………………………………………32 3.2.5 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………43 CHAPTER 4: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A RIGHT BASED FISHERY MANAGEMENT POLICY IN A HETEROGENEOUS FISHERY SETTING ……45 4.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………...45 4.2 Economic Analysis of a Rights Based Fishery Management Policy ……………45 4.3 Theoretical Model………………………………………………………………..47 4.4 Results and Conclusion ………………………………………………………….58 4.5 Challenges of Implementing the Policies and Suggestions ……………………...59 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................60 APPENDIX A ……………………………………………………………………….65 APPENDIX B ……………………………………………………………………......66 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1: Fishery Management Institutions in West Bengal and Their Functions….27 Table 3.2: Demographic Characters …………………………………………………33 Table 4.1: Industry Participants ……………………………………………………...48 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: World Fish Utilization and Supply ……………………………………….1 Figure 2.1: Relationship between the Fish Population (Stock) and Growth ………….8 Figure 2.2: Efficient Sustainable Yield for Fishery …………………………………..9 Figure 2.3: Open Access Fishery Outcome ……………………………………….…11 Figure 3.1: Map of West Bengal, India with Location of Digha Circled ……………29 Figure 3.2: Market Channel of Digha ……………………………………………….31 Figure 3.3: Number of Children Engage in Fishing …………………………………34 Figure 3.4: Likelihood of
Recommended publications
  • Vocational Education and Fisheries S, N. Dwivedi & V. Ravindranathan

    Vocational Education and Fisheries S, N. Dwivedi & V. Ravindranathan

    Vocational education and fisheries Item Type article Authors Dwivedi, S.N.; Ravindranathan, V. Download date 24/09/2021 18:45:18 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/31676 Journal of the Indian Fisheries Association 8+9, 1978-79, 65-70 VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND FISHERIES S, N. DWIVEDI & V. RAVINDRANATHAN Central Institute of Fisheries Education Versova, Bombay-400 067. ABSTRACT The knowledge and skill of the poople are important tools for the development of natural resources and for the prosperty of any country. The quality of education is judged not only from the inquistiveness and knowiedge it can impart but also from it's usefulees in meeting the urgent economic problems of the country. Vocational Courses in fisheries are offered in four states. The technologies in fisheries developed offer good scope for Vocational training for self employment. There is an urgent need to have radical revision of the course content to make the students vocationaliy competent. FISHERIES EDUCATION — STATE OF ART : Recognising the need to study, assess and develop the fishery resources of the country, Govt. of India established the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) Cochin; Central Inland Fisheries Risearch Institute (CIFRI) Barrackpore, Central Institute of Fisheries Technology (CIFI) Cochin and Deep Sea Fishing Station, Bombay soon after the Independence. Since then, the fish production trend in the country has been encouraing. The annual fish production has increased from 0.5 million tons in 1950, to 2.6 million tons in 1983. Although the rate of increase has been fairly good, the per capita consumption of fish, even now, is less than 5 kg/yr.
  • The Trade in Live Reef Food Fish Volume 1

    The Trade in Live Reef Food Fish Volume 1

    THE TRADE IN LIVE REEF FOOD FISH GOING GOING GONE VOLUME 1 MAIN REPORT Acknowledgements This report was prepared by ADM Capital Foundation and the University of Hong Kong. We would like to thank Sam Inglis, Lisa Genasci, Jane Chu, Kathleen Ho and and Ellie Appleby for their diligence in reading and editing; Doug Woodring, who drove the initial concept; and DESIGNORM for their innovative and informative graphics. Rachel Wong helped to compile some of the data, and Liu Min, Joyce Wu and Felix Chan kindly provided data. We are grateful to the government staff of the Marine Department, the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, the Fish Marketing Organization and the Customs and Excise Department for responding to our questions and clarifying issues raised, as well as reviewing an earlier draft, and to the many traders and participants of the trade who we interviewed. Disclaimer This document (the ‘Document’) has been prepared by ADM Capital Foundation (‘ADMCF’) for general introduction, overview and discussion purposes only and does not constitute definitive advice on regulatory, investment or legal issues. It should not be used as a substitute for taking regulatory, financial, tax or legal advice in any specific situation. Information provided in the report has been obtained from, or is based upon, sources believed to be reliable but have not been independently verified, and no guarantee, representation or warranty is made as to its accuracy or completeness. Information contained in this Document is current as of December 2017 and is subject to change without notice. Information contained in this Document relating to unrealised data and projections is indicative only, and has been based on unaudited, internal data and assumptions, which have not been independently verified and are subject to material corrections, verifications and amendments.
  • The Legal Basis in New Hampshire: Adopting Stormwater Zoning Ordinances and Land Development Regulations

    The Legal Basis in New Hampshire: Adopting Stormwater Zoning Ordinances and Land Development Regulations

    The Legal Basis in New Hampshire: Adopting Stormwater Zoning Ordinances and Land Development Regulations FEDERAL LAW NPDES AND EPA The lack of a precise definition of MEP allows small Through the Phase 1 and Phase 2 NPDES MS4s flexibility in tailoring their programs to their CLEAN WATER ACT programs EPA sets water quality standards for actual needs. The Clean Water Act (CWA) originated as the point source and wastewater discharge permits. The MEP standard requires small MS4s to satisfy Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 in EPA administers NH’s NPDES permit program the following six “minimum control measures”: response to unchecked dumping of pollution into and permits for stormwater and sewer overflow 1) Public Education and Outreach the nation’s surface waters. At that time, about discharges. Individual homes that are connected to 2) Public Participation 2 /3 of U.S. waters had been declared unsafe for a municipal system, use a septic system, or do not fishing and swimming. The CWA provides the basic produce surface discharge do not need an NPDES 3) Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination structure for: permit. Industrial, municipal, and other facilities (IDDE) Program must obtain permits if their discharges go directly 4) Construction Site Runoff Controls 1) regulating discharges of pollution into the to surface waters. waters of the United States, and 5) Post-Construction Runoff Controls 6) Good House Keeping and Pollution Prevention 2) regulating quality standards for the nation’s NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT TYPES for Municipal Operations surface waters. Its objective is “to restore and The NPDES permit regulations cover 3 main maintain the chemical, physical, and biological classes of stormwater and wastewater discharges.
  • Innovation Management in Seafood Industry Sector

    Innovation Management in Seafood Industry Sector

    Development of Innovation Capabilities in the New Zealand Seafood Industry Sector Andrew Jeffs Principal Scientist, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 109-695, Auckland, New Zealand Email: [email protected] Shantha Liyanage Associate Professor, Business School, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand Email: [email protected] Abstract: Most seafood industries around the world are founded on wild capture fisheries which have been facing a static or declining resource base due to over exploitation. Achieving growth with this restraint is a challenge that seafood enterprises have struggled with globally for more than 20 years. Innovation efforts in this industry have focused on developing new sources of raw material, increasing financial returns through value-adding, increased efficiency of production and management integration. An early change in the management regime for wild fish stocks is identified as the key factor in encouraging innovation in the New Zealand seafood industry. The greater certainty in raw material supply provided by the management regime has enabled seafood enterprises to shift their attention from competing to secure sufficient raw material toward increasing their returns from the raw materials they know will be available to them. This paper examines the dynamics of innovation capability building and provides management directions for enhancing innovation capability in this industry. Overall, it is hoped that this study may help to act as an exemplar for encouraging innovation in other national or regional seafood industries, and for other industries based on renewable natural resources. Keywords: seafood; innovation; Quota Management System; innovation capability, New Zealand; aquaculture; biotechnology; national innovation system.
  • Stormwater Runoff Control: a Model Ordinance for Meeting Local Water Quality Management Needs

    Stormwater Runoff Control: a Model Ordinance for Meeting Local Water Quality Management Needs

    Volume 20 Issue 4 Fall 1980 Fall 1980 Stormwater Runoff Control: A Model Ordinance for Meeting Local Water Quality Management Needs Frank E. Maloney Richard G. Hamann Bram D. Canter Recommended Citation Frank E. Maloney, Richard G. Hamann & Bram D. Canter, Stormwater Runoff Control: A Model Ordinance for Meeting Local Water Quality Management Needs, 20 Nat. Resources J. 713 (1980). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol20/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. STORMWATER RUNOFF CONTROL: A MODEL ORDINANCE FOR MEETING LOCAL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT NEEDS FRANK E. MALONEY,* RICHARD G. HAMANN** and BRAM D. E. CANTER*** INTRODUCTION Water pollution abatement programs in the United States have been directed almost entirely toward the elimination of point sources of water pollution-defined in the Federal Water Pollution Control Act' as "any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance... from which pollutants are or may be discharged." 2 Yet officials of the En- vironmental Protection Agency estimate that fifty percent or more of the nation's water pollution is waste picked up from the land by rainfall, which then reaches ground and surface waters through run- off and seepage and not through a pipe or other point source of pollution.3 The waters which drain urban streets, construction sites, agricul- tural areas and other sites of intensive human use are often heavily *Professor of Law and Dean Emeritus, University of Florida Law Center; Director, Water Law Studies of the University of Florida; B.A., 1939, University of Toronto; J.D., 1942, University of Florida.
  • Draft District of Columbia Stormwater Management Guidebook Page 10 Chapter 2

    Draft District of Columbia Stormwater Management Guidebook Page 10 Chapter 2

    STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK Prepared for: District Department of the Environment Watershed Protection Division District of Columbia Prepared by: Center for Watershed Protection 8390 Main Street Ellicott City, MD 21043 August 2012 i ii #!&,'!* ',$-0+2'-, 0#%0"',% $3230# 3."2#1 2- 2&# '120'!2 -$ -*3+ ' 2-0+52#0 ,%#+#,2 3'"# --) 5'** # 4'* *# 2 Q &22.S ""-#T"!T%-4 .3 *'!2'-, 12-0+52#0V%3'"# --) #-2'!#1 0#%0"',% $3230# 4#01'-,1 -$ 2&# +,3* 5'** # .-12#" 2 2&'1 5# 1'2#T $3230# 4#01'-,1 0# #6.#!2#" 2- -!!30Q 2 +-12Q -,!# 7#0T Acknowledgements A major undertaking such as this requires the dedication and cooperative efforts of many individuals. Dr. Hamid Karimi, Director of Natural Resources, Sheila Besse, Associate Director of Watershed Protection, Jeff Seltzer, Associate Director of Stormwater Management, and Timothy Karikari, Branch Chief of Technical Services each deserve credit for their overall leadership and support for this project. Their willingness to allow staff to pursue ideas to their fullest and provide necessary time, resources and managerial support, laid the foundation for much innovation. Project Manger Rebecca C. Stack, DDOE-technical services Lead Authors Greg Hoffmann, P.E., Center for Watershed Protection Rebecca C. Stack, DDOE-technical services Brian Van Wye, DDOE-stormwater Contributors and Peer Reviewers Joseph Battiata, P.E., Center for Watershed Protection Gerald Brock, Ph.D., George Washington University Josh Burch, DDOE-planning & restoration Collin R. Burrell, DDOE-water quality Walter Caldwell, DDOE-inspection enforcement Jonathan Champion, DDOE-stormwater Reid Christianson P.E., Ph.D., Center for Watershed Protection Laine Cidlowski, Office of Planning Richard DeGrandchamp, Ph.D., University of Colorado/Scientia Veritas Elias Demessie, DDOE-technical services Diane Douglas, DDOE-water quality Alex Foraste, Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
  • Critique of PPI Study on Shale Gas Job Creation Prepared by Jannette M

    Critique of PPI Study on Shale Gas Job Creation Prepared by Jannette M

    Critique of PPI Study on Shale Gas Job Creation Prepared by Jannette M. Barth, Ph.D. Pepacton Institute LLC January 2, 2012 Supporters of shale gas drilling in New York State frequently reference a report issued by The Public Policy Institute of New York State, Inc. (PPI) titled “Drilling for Jobs: What the Marcellus Shale Could Mean for New York,” July 2011. As with the other industry-funded studies on this subject, this PPI report is one- sided and self-evidently crafted with the sole purpose of supporting the gas industry. Independent academic research not funded by the gas industry reaches vastly different conclusions than do these industry-funded studies. The PPI report does not mention the independent research. Some examples of conclusions made by independent researchers are that areas that once had thriving extractive industries end up suffering the highest rates of long-term poverty (Freudenburg and Wilson); and counties that have focused on energy development underperform economically compared to peer counties with little or no energy development (Headwaters Economics). Independently researched studies include the following: • “Fossil Fuel Extraction as a County Economic Development Strategy: Are Energy-focusing Counties Benefiting?”, Headwaters Economics, September 2008 (Revised 7/11/09). • “Mining the Data: Analyzing the Economic Implications of Mining for Nonmetropolitan Regions,” William R. Freudenberg and Lisa J. Wilson, Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 72, Fall 2002, 549-75. • “The Economic Impact of Shale Gas Extraction: A Review of Existing Studies,” Thomas C. Kinnaman, Ecological Economics, 70 (2011) 1243-1249. • “Hydrofracking a Boom-Bust Endeavor,” Susan Christopherson, August 14, 2011. • “The Local Economic Impacts of Natural Gas Development in the Valle Vidal, New Mexico,” Thomas Michael Power, January 2005.
  • Technological Modernization and Its Impact on Agriculture, Fisheries And

    Technological Modernization and Its Impact on Agriculture, Fisheries And

    Publications 2017 Technological Modernization and Its Impact on Agriculture, Fisheries and Fossil Fuel Utilization in the Asia Pacific Countries with Emphasis on Sustainability Perspective Rajee Olaganathan Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Kathleen Quigley Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/publication Part of the Agriculture Commons, Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Olaganathan, R., & Quigley, K. (2017). Technological Modernization and Its Impact on Agriculture, Fisheries and Fossil Fuel Utilization in the Asia Pacific Countries with Emphasis on Sustainability Perspective. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research (IJBR), 8(2). Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/publication/839 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research (IJBR) ISSN 0976-2612, Online ISSN 2278–599X, Vol-8, Issue-2, 2017, pp422-441 http://www.bipublication.com Research Article Technological modernization and its impact on Agriculture, Fisheries and Fossil fuel utilization in the Asia Pacific Countries with emphasis on sustainability perspective Olaganathan Rajee* and Kathleen Quigley College of Arts and Sciences and College of Business Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Worldwide, 75 Bukit Timah Road, #02-01/02 Boon Siew Building, Singapore. 229833 * Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected]; Phone: +1 626 236 2254 ABSTRACT Modernization is a process that moves towards efficiency. This affects most of the fields such as agriculture, fisheries, forestry, urban planning, policy, fossil fuel usage, manufacturing, technology, economic growth etc.
  • Challenges and Opportunities of the US Fishing Industry

    Challenges and Opportunities of the US Fishing Industry

    Advancing Opportunity, Prosperity, and Growth WWW.HAMILTONPROJECT.ORG What’s the Catch? Challenges and Opportunities of the U.S. Fishing Industry By Melissa S. Kearney, Benjamin H. Harris, Brad Hershbein, David Boddy, Lucie Parker, and Katherine Di Lucido SEPTEMBER 2014 he economic importance of the fishing sector extends well beyond the coastal communities for which it is a vital industry. Commercial fishing operations, including seafood wholesalers, processors, and retailers, all contribute billions of dollars annually to the U.S. economy. Recreational fishing— Temploying both fishing guides and manufacturers of fishing equipment—is a major industry in the Gulf Coast and South Atlantic. Estimates suggest that the economic contribution of the U.S. fishing industry is nearly $90 billion annually, and supports over one and a half million jobs (National Marine Fisheries Service [NMFS] 2014). A host of challenges threaten fishing’s viability as an American industry. Resource management, in particular, is a key concern facing U.S. fisheries. Since fish are a shared natural resource, fisheries face traditional “tragedy of the commons” challenges in which the ineffective management of the resource can result in its depletion. In the United States, advances in ocean fishery management over the past four decades have led to improved sustainability, but more remains to be done: 17 percent of U.S. fisheries are classified as overfished (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2014), and even those with adequate fish stocks may benefit economically from more-efficient management structures. Meeting the resource management challenge can lead to improved economic activity and better sustainability in the future.
  • Economic Benefits of the Bristol Bay Salmon Industry

    Economic Benefits of the Bristol Bay Salmon Industry

    ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF THE BRISTOL BAY SALMON INDUSTRY PREPARED BY WINK RESEARCH & CONSULTING JULY 2018 PREPARED FOR RESEARCH CONDUCTED FOR This project was commissioned by the Bristol Bay Regional Seafood Development Association, Bristol Bay Economic Development Corporation, and Bristol Bay Native Corporation. These organizations are committed to developing regional salmon resources for the benefit of their respective stakeholders. RESEARCH CONDUCTED BY Wink Research & Consulting, LLC provides economic research and consulting services. Research and study findings contained in this report were conducted by Andy Wink. Mr. Wink has extensive experience researching markets for Bristol Bay seafood products and is an expert on economic benefits provided by the Alaska seafood industry. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary of Terms & Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 4 Chapter 1. Resource Profile............................................................................................................. 6 Chapter 2. Supply Chain & Market Profile ................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3. Value of Resource & Assets .......................................................................................
  • COVID-19 and the U.S. Seafood Sector

    COVID-19 and the U.S. Seafood Sector

    COVID-19 and the U.S. Seafood Sector September 21, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46535 SUMMARY R46535 COVID-19 and the U.S. Seafood Sector September 21, 2020 The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has reduced demand for many seafood products and disrupted seafood supply chains. Food service purchasers, such as restaurants, Harold F. Upton cafeterias, and schools, have either closed or operated at reduced capacities, and the risk of Analyst in Natural coronavirus transmission in public settings has affected consumer behavior. Loss of food service Resources Policy sales are especially harmful to the seafood sector, because these sales account for approximately two-thirds of consumer expenditures on seafood. In addition, decreases in consumer demand, health risks to workers, and restrictions on businesses have disrupted domestic and international supply chains. Supply chains refer to the movement of seafood from fishers and fish farmers to processors and wholesalers that supply retail markets and food services, where consumers purchase seafood products. These disruptions, as well as lower economic activity in the United States and other countries as a result of the pandemic, have contributed to decreased trade in seafood products. In some cases, businesses have adapted to these disruptions and reduced some of the early impacts of the coronavirus. However, disruptions to the seafood sector are likely to continue until the virus can be contained and restrictions on dining and social gatherings are relaxed. Section 12005 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act; P.L. 116-136) authorized $300 million for assistance to fishery participants, including commercial, charter, tribal, and subsistence fishermen, and processors.
  • Market Structure Alaska Seafood Processing Industry

    Market Structure Alaska Seafood Processing Industry

    AKU-T-79-004 C. 3 MARKET STRUCTURE uf the ALASKA SEAFOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY by V. L. Orth 3. A. Richardson S. Mj. Piddle I! niver~ity of Alack t gaea ~rant Report 7H - 10 Bee entber 1979 Alaska Sea Grant Program University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 MARKET STRUCTURE OF THE ALASKA SEAFOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY Volume I Shellfish by Franklin L. Orth James A. Richardson Sandra M. Pidde Sea Grant Report 78-10 November 1979 CONTENTS PAGE FIGURES vij TABLES. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. XVi i CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION Background and Scope of the Study. Data Resources ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 15 3 Organization. Structural Elements of the UPS. Seafood Processing Industry: A Literature Summary. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 Alaska Fishing Industry: Regulatory Environment.. 9 Federal 9 State.. 13 CHAPTER II. ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF THE ALASKA SEAFOOD PROCESSING SECTOR AND DETAILED SHELLFISH PROCESSING INDUSTRIES. ~ 15 Introduction. Structural Parameters of the Alaska Seafood Processing S ector.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 16 Geographic Distribution of Production Facilities........ 16 Aggregate Concentration.. 19 Diversification. 31 Turnover.... 36 Vertical Integration ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 4 40 Other Company-Specific Information 41 Structural Parameters of Individual Seafood Markets: Shellfish 45 Market Concentration ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 47 Plant Size Characteristics............ 52 Summary 56 CHAPTER III. THE HISTORY OF THE KING AND TANNER CRAB FISHERIES IN ALASKA 65 Development of the Alaska King Crab Fishery 65 The Foreign Fishery. 65 The U.S. Fishery ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 72 Development. of the Alaska Tanner Crab Fishery. 76 Foreign Fishery: Japan....... 76 Foreign Fishery: USSR... ~ 77 T he U.S. Fishery 81 CONTENTS continued! PAGE CHAPTER IV. THE CRAB RESOURCE. 83 King Crab. 83 World Catch........... 83 Expansion Potential of the King Crab Fishery...........