DOCSLIB.ORG

Shakespeare the History of the Theater PERFORMANCE HISTORY • 1550 London Aldermen Ban “Common Players” (I.E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shakespeare the History of the Theater PERFORMANCE HISTORY • 1550 London Aldermen Ban “Common Players” (I.E Shakespeare The History of the Theater PERFORMANCE HISTORY • 1550 London aldermen ban “common players” (i.e. without a patron) from playing in the city without a license • 1572 “Act for the punishment of Vagabondes” - players had to be licensed by two magistrates; authorized by great nobles (under a further clause of 1598) o as a result…1572 James Burbage wrote to Leicester for patronage • James Burbage - both an actor and a joiner James and Ellen Brayne were the parents of Cuthbert (b. 1566) and Richard (b. 1568) • Burbage part of Leicester’s Men, 1572-76 Leicester’s Men had been around, mainly in the provinces, since 1559 (known as Dudley’s til 1564) • 1574 Elizabeth gave Leicester’s Men a royal patent (first ever) this allowed them to play anywhere in England, even in the city. o They became the most important company from 1574-1583; o Company came to an end in 1588, possibly merging with Strange’s company • 1576 Chapel Children move into the 1st Blackfriars o Other boys’ company at Paul’s (boys faded after 1609) • Early 1580s: Leicester’s Men, Sussex’s, Warwick’s, Essex’s, Oxford’s all played in London when they could • 1583-88 Queen’s Men – picked mainly from Leicester’s Men - (including Tarlton) took over from Leicester’s as the predominant company (Worcester’s their closest rivals) • Queen’s Men licensed in 1583 to play at the Bull Inn and the Bell Inn d o Played 21 times at court, 1583-90, but soon suffered from the competition of first the Admiral’s Men, then the Lord Chamberlain’s Men • 1590 Admiral’s Men amalgamate with Strange’s at the Theatre, o Moved to the Rose under Philip Henslowe in 1592 o The Admiral’s Men had Edward Alleyn (from Worcester’s Men) • 1594 last major reshuffle produces the Chamberlain’s Men and the Admiral’s Men as the two main London companies (Queen’s Men forced to tour the provinces) o The Chamberlin’s Men had Richard Burbage, Cuthbert B, Kempe, Hemming, Condell, Pope, Phillips… & William Shakespeare • 1598 Privy Council decree limits the companies in London to two: the Admirals & the Lord Chamberlain’s (Worcester’s added as a 3rd company in 1602) • 1603 King James a theatre-lover… o Worcester’s > Queen Anne’s o Admiral’s > Prince Henry’s o Chamberlain’s > King’s Men • 1596: eight sharers in Chamberlain’s Men (twelve by 1603 as King’s men) 1599: seven sharers become ‘housekeepers’ in the new Globe: Burbage, Cuthbert, Shakespeare, Hemming, Kempe, Phillips, Pope • Playwrights’ pay: Henslowe paid Dekker £30 in 1598 for his share in writing 16 plays he paid £5 to purchase a play outright • Playhouse takings and costs Admiral’s gallery takings were ave £20/wk in 1597 ie c.£1000 for the year • To rebuild the Globe in 1614 cost £1400 o A single performance in court brought in £10 • The repertory system Admiral’s played through 6 days/wk for 49 wks (pausing only for the 37 days of Lent) o In 94-95 they performed 38 plays, of which 21 were new to their repertory (two of the new plays were performed only once; only eight survived to the following season) o 95-96: 37 plays of which 9 were new o 96-97: 34 plays, 14 new o The most popular play in those three seasons – The Wise Men of Westchester – performed 32 times (less than once a month) THE PLAYHOUSES • 1550s & 1560s – scaffolding structures & inns (like the Bel Savage & the Boar’s Head) • The Queen’s Men alternated between the Bel Savage in summer (open) & the Bell in winter (roofed) • 1567 James Burbage’s bro-in-law John Brayne: Red Lion (scaffolding structure in Stepney); but unsuccessful • 1576 first durable playhouse - The Theatre – James Burbage (21 yr lease) in Shoreditch (outside juris’n of City Fathers) o 1577 The Curtain o 1587 The Rose (Henslowe) demolished 1606 partially excavated 1989 • 1594 Privy Council ban on performing in city inns • 1595 The Swan HISTORY of the playhouses in London – from 1595 • 1596 James Burbage buys upper floors of the Blackfriars – but faces opposition: leases it out to boys • 1597 Feb – James Burbage died • April – Blackfriars lease expires • Next two years – the company rents other playhouses • December 1598: Moving the Theatre timbers at night, across the river • 1599 (mid?) The Globe opens in Southwark… THE GLOBE • Capacity 3000 (same as the Swan) o 20 sides o 100 ft diameter (yard: 80 ft) o stage c.45 ft wide x 30 ft deep • 1600 Henslowe builds the Fortune open-air, but square (for Worcester’s, jointly with Oxford’s, permitted to be the 3rd London company) INDOOR (HALL) THEATRES • 1608 The Blackfriars (bought in 1596) finally taken over by the King’s Men o capacity 600 max o 6 entrances to galleries o … a further space for a bench in the pit… o …2s in total for a stool on the stage • A reversal of the outdoor playhouses, where the closest people paid least • Puritans attacks in the early 1580s o 1583 Paris Garden PLAGUE • Playhouses could not re-open until the weekly bill of plague victims had been under 50 for 3 weeks • Prolonged closures in 81-82, 92-93, 03-04, 08-09, 09-10, 25, 30, 36-37, 40 and 41 • 1581 Master of the Revels is given powers over plays, including censorship and licensing of playhouses o Sir Edmund Tilney: Master of Revels, 579-1610 POLITICS • 1601 Essex rebellion & Richard II for 40s [JO’C PLAY exonerated - performed for Queen the night before Essex’s execution] • Act to Restrain Abuses 1606 – censorship of profane oaths • 1615 Henslowe died. o …1616 Shakespeare died. o …1619 RB died • The 1642 ban .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shakespeare Wrote Shakespeare
    OPEN FORUM The Pages of The Oxfordian are open to all sides of the Authorship Question Shakespeare Wrote Shakespeare David Kathman or the vast majority of Shake- speare scholars, there is no ‘au- thorship question’; they agree that F the works of William Shake- speare were written by William Shake- speare of Stratford-upon-Avon (allow- ing for some collaboration), and tend to ignore or dismiss anyone who claims oth- erwise. In the following pages I will try to explain, from the perspective of a Shake- speare scholar, why the Stratford Shakespeare’s authorship is so generally ac- cepted by historians, and why those historians do not take seriously the various attempts to deny that attribution. I realize from experience that this explanation is not likely to convince many committed antistratfordians, but at the very least I hope to correct some misconceptions about what Shakespeare scholars actually believe. For the purposes of argument, we can distinguish among three main strands of William Shakespeare’s biography, which I will call Stratford Shakespeare, Actor Shakespeare, and Author Shakespeare. Stratford Shakespeare was baptized in Stratford-upon-Avon in 1564, married Anne Hathaway in 1582, had three children with her, bought New Place in 1597 and various other properties in and around Stratford over the following decade, and was buried in there in 1616. Actor Shakespeare was a member of the Lord Chamberlain’s/King’s Men, the leading acting company in London from 1594 on, and an original sharer in the Globe and Blackfriars playhouses. Author Shakespeare signed the dedications of Venus and Adonis (1593) and The Rape of Lucrece (1594), and over the next twenty years was named on title 13 THE OXFORDIAN Volume XI 2009 Kathman pages as the author of numerous plays and poems, and was praised by such crit- ics as Francis Meres and Gabriel Harvey.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelfth Night Study Guide — 2 Twelfth Night a Support Packet for Studying the Play and Attending the Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey’S Main Stage Production
    a study guide compiled and arranged by the Education Department of The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey Twelfth Night study guide — 2 Twelfth Night a support packet for studying the play and attending The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey’s Main Stage production General Information p3- Using This Study Guide p16- Sources for this Study Guide (and Additional Resources) William Shakespeare p4- Shakespeare: Helpful Tips for Exploring & Seeing His Works p5- The Life of William Shakespeare p5- Shakespeare’s London p6- Are You SURE This Is English? About The Play p7- Twelfth Night: A Synopsis p8- Sources and History of the Play p10- Commentary and Criticism Studying Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night p9- Shakespeare’s Common Tongue p9- Terms and Phrases found in Twelfth Night p11- Aspects of Twelfth Night p12- Twelfth Night: Food For Thought p13- Additional Topics for Discussion Classroom Applications p13- Follow-Up Activities p14- What Did He Say? p14- Who Said That? p15- Meeting the Core Curriculum Content Standards p16- “Who Said That?” Answer Key About the Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey p17- About The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey p17- Other Opportunities for Students... and Teachers The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey is an independent, professional theatre located on the Drew University campus. The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey’s programs are made possible, in part, by funding from the New Jersey State Council on the Arts/ Department of State, a Partner Agency of the National Endowment for the Arts, as well as funds from the National Endowment for the Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dramatic Space of Hamlet's Theatre
    Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 4, 1 (2012) 59-75 “The Play’s the Thing” The Dramatic Space of Hamlet’s Theatre Balázs SZIGETI Eötvös Loránd University Department of English Studies [email protected] Abstract. In my paper I investigate the use of the dramatic space in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. The tragedy will be observed with the method of “pre-performance criticism,” which first and foremost makes use of the several potentials a play contains and puts on display before an actual performance; it offers, also in the light of the secondary literature, various ways of interpretation, resulting from the close-reading of the play and considers their possible realizations in the space of the stage both from the director’s and the actor’s point of view, including the consequences the respective lines of interpretation may have as regards the play as a whole. Hamlet does not only raise the questions of the theatrical realization of a play but it also reflects on the ontology of the dramatic space by putting the performance of The Mousetrap-play into one of its focal points and scrutinises the very interaction between the dramatic space and the realm of the audience. I will discuss the process how Hamlet makes use of his private theatre and how the dramatic space is transformed as The Murder of Gonzago turns into The Mousetrap-performance. Keywords: Hamlet; The Mousetrap; dramatic space; pre-performance criticism Shakespeare’s Hamlet1 does not only raise the questions of the theatrical realization of a play but it also reflects on the ontology of the dramatic space by putting the performance of The Mousetrap-play into one of its focal points and 1 In the present paper I quote the play according to the Norton Shakespeare edition (Greenblatt et.
    [Show full text]
  • From Sidney to Heywood: the Social Status of Commercial Theatre in Early Modern London
    From Sidney to Heywood: the social status of commercial theatre in early modern London Romola Nuttall (King’s College London, UK) The Literary London Journal, Volume 14 Number 1 (Spring 2017) Abstract Thomas Heywood’s Apology for Actors (written c. 1608, published 1612) is one of the only stand-alone, printed deFences of the proFessional theatre to emerge from the early modern period. Even more significantly, it is ‘the only contemporary complete text we have – by an early modern actor about early modern actors’ (Griffith 191). This is rather surprising considering how famous playwrights and drama of that period have become, but it is revealing of attitudes towards the profession and the stage at the turn of the sixteenth century. Religious concerns Formed a central part of the heated public debate which contested the social value oF proFessional drama during the early modern era. Claims against the literary status of work produced for the commercial stage were also frequently levelled against the theatre from within the establishment, a prominent example being Sir Philip Sidney’s Defence of Poesie (written c. 1579, published 1595). Considering Heywood’s Apology in relation to Sidney’s Defence, and thinking particularly about the ways these treatises appropriate the classical idea oF mimesis and the consequent social value of literature, gives fresh insight into the changing status of drama in Shakespeare’s lifetime and how attitudes towards commercial theatre developed between the 1570s and 1610s. The following article explores these ideas within the framework of the London in which Heywood and his acting company lived and worked.
    [Show full text]
  • A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement
    A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement California’s Home for the Classics California’s Home for the Classics California’s Home for the Classics Table of Contents Dating Shakespeare’s Plays 3 Life in Shakespeare’s England 4 Elizabethan Theatre 8 Working in Elizabethan England 14 This Sceptered Isle 16 One Big Happy Family Tree 20 Sir John Falstaff and Tavern Culture 21 Battle of the Henries 24 Playing Nine Men’s Morris 30 FUNDING FOR A NOISE WITHIN’S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IS PROVIDED IN paRT BY: The Ahmanson Foundation, Alliance for the Advancement of Arts Education, Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich, Employees Community Fund of Boeing California, The Capital Group Companies, Citigroup Foundation, Disney Worldwide Outreach, Doukas Family Foundation, Ellingsen Family Foundation, The Herb Alpert Foundation, The Green Foundation, Kiwanis Club of Glendale, Lockheed Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County Arts Commission, B.C. McCabe Foundation, Metropolitan Associates, National Endowment for the Arts, The Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation, The Steinmetz Foundation, Dwight Stuart Youth Foundation, Waterman Foundation, Zeigler Family Foundation. 2 A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement Dating Shakespeare’s Plays Establishing an exact date for the Plays of Shakespeare. She theorized that authorship of Shakespeare’s plays is a very Shakespeare (a “stupid, ignorant, third- difficult task. It is impossible to pin down rate play actor”) could not have written the exact order, because there are no the plays attributed to him. The Victorians records giving details of the first production. were suspicious that a middle-class actor Many of the plays were performed years could ever be England’s greatest poet as before they were first published.
    [Show full text]
  • THEATRE of the ENGLISH and ITALIAN RENAISSANCE Theatre of the English and Italian Renaissance
    THEATRE OF THE ENGLISH AND ITALIAN RENAISSANCE Theatre of the English and Italian Renaissance Edited by J. R. MULRYNE Professor of English and Comparative Literary Studies and Chairman, Graduate School of Renaissance Studies, University of Warwick and MARGARET SHEWRING Lecturer in Theatre Studies and Course DirectoT, Graduate School of Renaissance Studies, University of Warwick Palgrave Macmillan ISBN 978-1-349-21738-0 ISBN 978-1-349-21736-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-21736-6 © J. R. Mulryne and Margaret Shewring 1991 Softcover reprint ofthe hardcover 1st edition 1991 All rights reserved. For information, write: Scholarly and Reference Division, St. Martin's Press, Inc., 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 First published in the United States of America in 1991 ISBN 978-0-312-06771-7 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Theatre of the English and Italian Renaissance / edited by J. R. Mulryne and Margaret Shewring. p. cm. Revised papers from a Seminar on 'English and ltalian Renaissance Theatre' held at the University of Warwick, May 1987. Inc1udes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-312-06771-7 1. Italian drama-To 17OQ-History and criticism-Congresses. 2. English drama-Early modem and Elizabethan, 1500-1600-History and criticism-Congresses. 3. Theater-ltaly-History-16th century-Congresses. 4. Theater-England-History-16th century­ -Congresses. I.Mulryne. J.R. 11. Shewring, Margaret. 111. Seminar on 'English and Italian Renaissance Theatre' (1987: University ofWarwick) PQ4139.T54 1991 352'.409-dc20 91-21021
    [Show full text]
  • “Revenge in Shakespeare's Plays”
    “REVENGE IN SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS” “OTHELLO” – LECTURE/CLASS WRITTEN: 1603-1604…. although some critics place the date somewhat earlier in 1601- 1602 mainly on the basis of some “echoes” of the play in the 1603 “bad” quarto of “Hamlet”. AGE: 39-40 Years Old (B.1564-D.1616) CHRONO: Four years after “Hamlet”; first in the consecutive series of tragedies followed by “King Lear”, “Macbeth” then “Antony and Cleopatra”. GENRE: “The Great Tragedies” SOURCES: An Italian tale in the collection “Gli Hecatommithi” (1565) of Giovanni Battista Giraldi (writing under the name Cinthio) from which Shakespeare also drew for the plot of “Measure for Measure”. John Pory’s 1600 translation of John Leo’s “A Geographical History of Africa”; Philemon Holland’s 1601 translation of Pliny’s “History of the World”; and Lewis Lewkenor’s 1599 “The Commonwealth and Government of Venice” mainly translated from a Latin text by Cardinal Contarini. STRUCTURE: “More a domestic tragedy than ‘Hamlet’, ‘Lear’ or ‘Macbeth’ concentrating on the destruction of Othello’s marriage and his murder of his wife rather than on affairs of state and the deaths of kings”. SUCCESS: The tragedy met with high success both at its initial Globe staging and well beyond mainly because of its exotic setting (Venice then Cypress), the “foregrounding of issues of race, gender and sexuality”, and the powerhouse performance of Richard Burbage, the most famous actor in Shakespeare’s company. HIGHLIGHT: Performed at the Banqueting House at Whitehall before King James I on 1 November 1604. AFTER: The play has been performed steadily since 1604; for a production in 1660 the actress Margaret Hughes as Desdemona “could have been the first professional actress on the English stage”.
    [Show full text]
  • "A Sharers' Repertory." Rethinking Theatrical
    Syme, Holger Schott. "A Sharers’ Repertory." Rethinking Theatrical Documents in Shakespeare’s England. Ed. Tiffany Stern. London: The Arden Shakespeare, 2020. 33–51. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 26 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350051379.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 26 September 2021, 08:28 UTC. Copyright © Tiffany Stern and contributors 2020. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 2 A Sharers’ Repertory Holger Schott Syme Without Philip Henslowe, we would know next to nothing about the kinds of repertories early modern London’s resident theatre companies offered to their audiences. As things stand, thanks to the existence of the manuscript commonly known as Henslowe’s Diary , scholars have been able to contemplate the long lists of receipts and expenses that record the titles of well over 200 plays, most of them now lost. The Diary gives us some sense of the richness and diversity of this repertory, of the rapid turnover of plays, and of the kinds of investments theatre companies made to mount new shows. It also names a plethora of actors and other professionals associated with the troupes at the Rose. But, because the records are a fi nancier’s and theatre owner’s, not those of a sharer in an acting company, they do not document how a group of actors decided which plays to stage, how they chose to alternate successful shows, or what they, as actors, were looking for in new commissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Othello Theme: the Challenges of Staging the Play
    Discovering Literature www.bl.uk/shakespeare Teachers’ Notes Curriculum subject: English Literature Key Stage: 4 and 5 Author / Text: William Shakespeare, Othello Theme: The challenges of staging the play Rationale These activities encourage young people to join the debate about how to stage and cast Othello. Students will consider the sensitive question of who should play the central roles – black or white actors, men or women. Using controversial paintings, playbills and production photos, they will explore how changing social contexts have shaped the way Othello has been staged over the course of four centuries. They will debate the pros and cons of different productions, and plan how they would stage the play if they could do so themselves. Content Literary and historical sources from the site: Portrait of Richard Burbage (early 17th century) The first illustrated works of Shakespeare edited by Nicholas Rowe (1709) Painting of Ira Aldridge as Othello (1826) Playbill advertising Ira Aldridge’s appearance as Othello in Northampton (1831) Playbill advertising Ira Aldridge’s appearance as Othello, Richard III and Shylock in Newcastle (1845) Paul Robeson as Othello and Uta Hagen as Desdemona (1943–44) Postcard of Olivier as Othello (1964) Photograph of Hugh Quarshie and Lucian Msamati in Othello (2015) Photograph of Joanna Vanderham and Hugh Quarshie in Othello (2015) Recommended reading (short articles): Playing Othello: Hugh Quarshie Othello, the role that entices and enrages actors of all skin colours: Andrew Dickson External
    [Show full text]
  • Redating Pericles: a Re-Examination of Shakespeare’S
    REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY A THESIS IN Theatre Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS by Michelle Elaine Stelting University of Missouri Kansas City December 2015 © 2015 MICHELLE ELAINE STELTING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY Michelle Elaine Stelting, Candidate for the Master of Arts Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2015 ABSTRACT Pericles's apparent inferiority to Shakespeare’s mature works raises many questions for scholars. Was Shakespeare collaborating with an inferior playwright or playwrights? Did he allow so many corrupt printed versions of his works after 1604 out of indifference? Re-dating Pericles from the Jacobean to the Elizabethan era answers these questions and reveals previously unexamined connections between topical references in Pericles and events and personalities in the court of Elizabeth I: John Dee, Philip Sidney, Edward de Vere, and many others. The tournament impresas, alchemical symbolism of the story, and its lunar and astronomical imagery suggest Pericles was written long before 1608. Finally, Shakespeare’s focus on father-daughter relationships, and the importance of Marina, the daughter, as the heroine of the story, point to Pericles as written for a young girl. This thesis uses topical references, Shakespeare’s anachronisms, Shakespeare’s sources, stylometry and textual analysis, as well as Henslowe’s diary, the Stationers' Register, and other contemporary documentary evidence to determine whether there may have been versions of Pericles circulating before the accepted date of 1608.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabethan Age
    The Elizabethan Age This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle, This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars, This other Eden, demi-paradise, This fortress built by Nature for herself Against infection and the hand of war, This happy breed of men, this little world, This precious stone set in the silver sea, Which serves it in the office of a wall Or as a moat defensive to a house, Against the envy of less happier lands,- This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England. – Richard II, William Shakespeare DRAMA TEACHER ACADEMY © 2015 LINDSAY PRICE 1 INDEX THE ELIZABETHAN AGE What was going on during this time period? THE ELIZABETHAN THEATRE The theatres, the companies, the audiences. STAGING THE ELIZABETHAN PLAY How does it differ from modern staging? DRAMA TEACHER ACADEMY © 2015 LINDSAY PRICE 2 Facts About Elizabethan England • The population rose from 3 to 4 million. • This increase lead to widespread poverty. • Average life expectancy was 40 years of age. • Country largely rural, though there is growth in towns and cities. • The principal industry still largely agricultural with wool as its main export. But industries such as weaving started to take hold. • Society strongly divided along class lines. • People had to dress according to their class. • The colour purple was reserved for royalty. • The religion was Protestant-Anglican – the Church of England. • There was a fine if you didn’t attend church. • Only males went to school. • The school day could run from 6 am to 5 pm. • The middle class ate a diet of grains and vegetables – meat was a luxury saved for the rich, who surprisingly ate few vegetables.
    [Show full text]
  • Contexts, Traditions, Afterlives Jessica Winston, Idaho State University
    1 2019 Seminar Abstracts: Tudor Performance: Contexts, Traditions, Afterlives Jessica Winston, Idaho State University “1559 and 1572 Temporary Banqueting Houses, the Elizabethan Masque, and Consumptive Court Entertainment at Whitehall” Catherine Clifford, Graceland University Analyzing the moment in which banqueting houses and dramatic court spectacles collided in Jacobean court masques, Patricia Fumerton argues that the history of banqueting house architecture is a “history of physical detachment” that “exaggerates the trend toward private rooms” which characterizes later Stuart court spectatorship (Cultural Aesthetics, 1991: 112). Royal banqueting houses, she argues, were spaces of fragmentation, physically detached from the daily traffic of the palace’s domestic and ceremonial chambers. In this detachment, Fumerton traces a line to an ideal of a privatized self that James I’s use of banqueting houses for revels exposed as ultimately illusory and performative (137). Fumerton’s intellectual history of the Tudor banqueting house is where I take my cue here. Under James I and Charles I, the Banqueting Houses at Whitehall served as spaces for performative hospitality, public ceremony, and, of course, entertainment. Under the same set of assumptions, royal banqueting houses developed under the Tudors, but largely as temporary, occasion-specific venues and often to host foreign retinues with elaborate displays of architectural consumption. This paper looks to two temporary banqueting houses at Whitehall, constructed by the Revels Office for visits by the French embassies in 1559 and 1572, and locates them within an early Elizabethan masquing culture. Making a case for “lesser” banqueting houses in our intellectual histories of Tudor court performance, I argue that these two temporary structures should be read in relation to the development and consumption of drama at court.
    [Show full text]