DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Cfl Statistics Cfl Regular Season Standings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Cfl Statistics Cfl Regular Season Standings 2019 CFL STATISTICS CFL REGULAR SEASON STANDINGS TO CFL WEEK #: 7 EAST DIVISION G W L T Pct Pts Str PF PA WEST DIVISION G W L T Pct Pts Str PF PA 1 Hamilton 6 5 1 0 .833 10 2W 210 115 1 Winnipeg 6510.833 10 1L 184 103 2 Montréal 5 3 2 0 .600 6 3W 127 131 2 Calgary 6420.667 8 2W 167 136 3 Ottawa 6 2 4 0 .333 4 4L 126 182 3 Edmonton 6420.667 8 1W 161 102 4 Toronto 6 0 6 0 .000 0 6L 75 214 4 Saskatchewan 6330.500 6 2W 183 154 5 BC 7160.143 2 3L 145 241 TOTALS 23 10 13 0 .435 20 538 642 TOTALS 31 17 14 0 .548 34 840 736 Division standings ranked by: 1) Standings pts, then 2) Head-to-head, 3) Win %, 4) Scoring quotient (+/-) EAST VS EAST G W L T Pct Pts PF PA WEST VS WEST G W L T Pct Pts PF PA Hamilton 3 2 1 0 .667 4 134 60 Calgary 22001.000 4 73 42 MontréalMontréal 3 2 1 0 .667 4 82 89 Winnipeg 2 2 0 0 1. 000 4 61 44 Toronto 1 0 1 0 .000 0 14 64 Edmonton 3210.667 4 93 57 Ottawa 1 0 1 0 .000 0 19 36 Saskatchewan 3210.667 4 93 80 BC 6060.000 0 127 224 EAST VS WEST G W L T Pct Pts PF PA WEST VS EAST G W L T Pct Pts PF PA Hamilton 3 3 0 0 1.000 6 76 55 Winnipeg 4310.750 6 123 59 Ottawa 5 2 3 0 .400 4 107 146 Edmonton 3210.667 4 68 45 Montréal 2 1 1 0 .500 2 45 42 Calgary 4220.500 4 94 94 Toronto 5 0 5 0 .000 0 61 150 BC 11001.000 2 18 17 Saskatchewan 3120.333 2 90 74 HOME RECORDS G W L T Pct Pts PF PA AWAY RECORDS G W L T Pct Pts PF PA BC 3 0 3 0 .000 0 47 111 BC 4130.250 2 98 130 Calgary 3 2 1 0 .667 4 90 80 Calgary 3210.667 4 77 56 Edmonton 3 3 0 0 1.000 6 97 48 Edmonton 3120.333 2 64 54 Hamilton 4 4 0 0 1.000 8 117 65 Hamilton 2110.500 2 93 50 Montréalotéa 2 20 0 1.000000 456 39 Montréalotéa 331200 .333333 2 719 92 Ottawa 4 1 3 0 .250 2 93 123 Ottawa 2110.500 2 33 59 Saskatchewan 3 2 1 0 .667 4 80 69 Saskatchewan 3120.333 2 103 85 Toronto 2 0 2 0 .000 0 31 82 Toronto 4040.000 0 44 132 Winnipeg 3 3 0 0 1.000 6 107 43 Winnipeg 3210.667 4 77 60 CFL TOTAL: HOME 27 17 10 0 .630 34 718 660 CFL TOTAL: AWAY 27 10 17 0 .370 20 660 718 2019 GAME RESULTS - CFL WEEK #: 7 NEXT WEEK IN THE CFL CFL WEEK #: 8 Gm Date HOME PF LL AWAY PF LL Gm Date Home Away Site 33 JJul l 25/19 OttOttawa16 +33 Cl Calgary17 +44 37 AAug 01/19 TtTorontoWi Winnipe i g BMO FiField ld 34 Jul 25/19 Edmonton 26 +26 Toronto 0 0 38 Aug 01/19 Saskatchewan Hamilton Mosaic Stadium 35 Jul 26/19 Hamilton 23 +14 Winnipeg 15 0 39 Aug 02/19 Montreal Ottawa Molson Stadium 36 Jul 27/19 BC 18 0 Saskatchewan 45 +27 40 Aug 03/19 Calgary Edmonton McMahon Stadium Head-to-Head BC CGY EDM HAM MTL OTT SSK TOR WPG Last 3:00 1-4 Pts In Team W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L W L OT BC ----- 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 00021001 1 11 10-0 Calgary 1 0 ----- 0 0 0 1 0 0 11101000 2 22 10-0 EdEdmonton t 2 0 0 0 ----- 0 0 1 1 0000010010 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 100 0 00-000 Hamilton 0 0 1 0 0 0 ----- 1 1 00101010 3 10 00-0 Montréal 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 ----- 10000000 2 10 00-0 Ottawa 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ----- 100002 2 22 10-0 Saskatchewan 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ----- 1000 0 20 10-0 Toronto 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0001 ----- 0 1 0 1 0 1 0-0 Winnipeg 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 200010 ----- 1 1 0 0 0-0 12 5 0 CFLCFL-WIDE WIDE IN 2019 CFL IN 2019 SCORING GAMES DECIDED ... GAMES WON ... ATTENDANCE Games Played 27 By 0-4 Points: 5 Won by Home Teams 17 Through CFL Wk #: 7 618,357 Total Scoring1,378 By 5-10 Points: 9 Won by Away Teams 10 CFL Average per game 22,902 Avg Points per Game51.0 By 11+ Points: 13 Interdivisional - East Div. 6 Average Win Margin+15.4 In the Last 3:00 12 Interdivisional - West Div. 9 CANADIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE ™ July 29, 2019 2019 CFL STATISTICS REGULAR SEASON RANKINGS · FINAL TO CFL WEEK #7 POINTS FOR OFFENSIVE POINTS TOUCHDOWNS OFFENCE TDS PTS ALLOWED OPP OFFENCE PTS OP TOUCHDOWNS OPP OFFEN. TDS RK Team Tot Avg Team Tot Avg Team TD Team TD Team Tot Avg Team Tot Avg Team TD Team TD RK 1 HAM 210 35.0 HAM 180 30.0 HAM 23 WPG 20 EDM 102 17.0 WPG 89 14.8 WPG 8 WPG 6 1 2 WPG 184 30 30.7 7 WPG 170 28 28.3 3 WPG 22 SSK 19 WPG 103 17 17.2 2 EDM 102 17 17.0 0 EDM 10 EDM 10 2 3 SSK 183 30.5 SSK 167 27.8 SSK 21 HAM 18 HAM 115 19.2 HAM 105 17.5 HAM 12 SSK 10 3 4 CGY 167 27.8 EDM 155 25.8 CGY 17 MTL 14 CGY 136 22.7 CGY 123 20.5 MTL 13 HAM 11 4 5 EDM 161 26.8 MTL 127 25.4 MTL 14 CGY 13 SSK 154 25.7 SSK 129 21.5 SSK 14 CGY 13 5 6 MTL 127 25.4 CGY 138 23.0 BC 13 EDM 13 MTL 131 26.2 MTL 127 25.4 CGY 15 MTL 13 6 7 OTT 126 21.0 OTT 119 19.8 EDM 13 BC 10 OTT 182 30.3 OTT 168 28.0 OTT 20 OTT 18 7 8 BC 145 20.7 BC 126 18.0 OTT 10 OTT 9 BC 241 34.4 BC 216 30.9 TOR 23 TOR 19 8 9 TOR 75 12.5 TOR 67 11.2 TOR 9 TOR 8 TOR 214 35.7 TOR 190 31.7 BC 27 BC 24 9 NET OFFENCE PASSING TDS SCRIM PLAYS * AV YDS PER PLY OPP NET OFFENCE OPP PASS TDS OPP SCRM PLAYS OPP YDS/PLAY RK Team Yds Avg Team TD Team Tot Avg Team Avg Team Yds Avg Team TD Team Tot Avg Team Avg RK 1 EDM 2551 425.2 WPG 14 EDM 386 64.3 SSK 6.7 EDM 1408 234.7 HAM 3 EDM 283 47.2 EDM 5.0 1 2 SSK 2312 385.3 HAM 10 OTT 349 58.2 MTL 6.6 WPG 1818 303.0 WPG 4 SSK 315 52.5 CGY 5.2 2 3 MTL 1872 374.4 CGY 8 SSK 347 57.8 EDM 6.6 SSK 1847 307.8 MTL 6 WPG 332 55.3 WPG 5.5 3 4 WPG 2235 372.5 EDM 8 WPG 340 56.7 WPG 6.6 CGY 1893 315.5 CGY 7 BC 389 55.6 SSK 5.9 4 5 HAM 2197 366.2 TOR 8 MTL 283 56.6 HAM 6.6 HAM 2121 353.5 EDM 8 HAM 359 59.8 HAM 5.9 5 6 CGY 2124 354.0 MTL 7 CGY 339 56.5 CGY 6.3 BC 2556 365.1 SSK 8 TOR 362 60.3 BC 6.6 6 7 TTOROR 11964964 332727..3 SSSSKK 7 HAM 335 55.8 TTOROR 6.2.2 OOTTTT 22578578 424299.7.7 OOTTTT 9 MTL 303044 60.8 OOTTTT 7.17.1 7 8 OTT 1809 301.5 BC 6 BC 376 53.7 BC 5.4 TOR 2614 435.7 TOR 12 CGY 365 60.8 TOR 7.2 8 9 BC 2025 289.3 OTT 4 TOR 319 53.2 OTT 5.2 MTL 2254 450.8 BC 15 OTT 365 60.8 MTL 7.4 9 1ST DOWNS 1ST DNS - RUSH 1ST DNS - PASS 1ST DN AVG YDS OPP 1ST DOWNS OPP RUSH 1ST D OPP PASS 1ST D OPP 1ST DN AVG RK Team FD Team FD Team FD Team Yds/Ply Team FD Team FD Team FD Team Yds/Ply RK 1 EDM 153 SSK 60 CGY 83 MTL 7.5 EDM 95 WPG 24 EDM 50 SSK 5.3 1 2 BC 137 EDM 53 EDM 82 SSK 7.4 WPG 105 EDM 28 SSK 66 CGY 5.5 2 3 SSK 132 MTL 50 BC 80 HAM 7.3 SSK 111 SSK 34 HAM 71 BC 5.9 3 4 HAM 125 WPG 46 TOR 79 TOR 666.6 HAM 125 MTL 38 WPG 71 HAM 616.1 4 5 CGY 123 BC 40 HAM 74 WPG 6.2 MTL 128 HAM 40 CGY 73 EDM 6.2 5 6 WPG 120 HAM 39 OTT 68 EDM 6.1 CGY 130 CGY 48 MTL 74 WPG 6.5 6 7 MTL 117 OTT 35 WPG 65 BC 6.0 TOR 139 OTT 50 TOR 79 OTT 6.9 7 8 OTT 111 CGY 31 SSK 61 CGY 5.7 OTT 140 TOR 54 BC 80 MTL 7.2 8 9 TOR 105 TOR 20 MTL 53 OTT 4.9 BC 150 BC 58 OTT 81 TOR 7.7 9 SACKS ALLOWED TWO-&-OUTS SACKS MADE 2-&-Os FORCED T/OVER RATIO TIME OF POSS'N PENALTIES PENALTY YARDS RK Team SA Team 2O Team QS Team 2O Team +/- Team Avg Team Tot Team Yds RK 1 EDM 1 MTL 19 EDM 23 EDM 39 MTL +88 EDM 33 33:23 23 WPG 44 WPG 400 1 2 HAM 9 EDM 21 SSK 20 CGY 37 CGY +7 WPG 33:11 OTT 46 OTT 431 2 3 SSK 9 SSK 23 HAM 19 WPG 36 HAM +7 SSK 32:39 CGY 52 TOR 432 3 4 WPG 9 CGY 24 CGY 15 HAM 32 WPG +4 MTL 32:37 TOR 53 SSK 480 4 5 MTL 14 HAM 31 OTT 11 SSK 31 EDM +3 BC 30:02 HAM 54 CGY 488 5 6 OTT 14 BC 33 WPG 11 TOR 28 OTT -2 CGY 29:00 SSK 55 HAM 494 6 7 TOR 18 OTT 34 TOR 8 OTT 24 BC -4 HAM 27:33 MTL 62 MTL 548 7 8 CGY 19 WPG 37 BC 7 BC 20 SSK -7 TOR 26:02 BC 70 BC 576 8 9 BCC 255 TORO 44 MTL 4 MTL 199 TORO -166 OOTT 26:00600 EDM80 EDM68 682 9 T/Os MADE * INTS THROWN FUMBLES LOST OPP PTS OFF TO T/Os FORCED INTERCEPTN BY FUM RECOVERIES PTS OFF T/Os ** RK Team T/O Team Int Team Fum Team Pts Team T/O Team Int Team FR Team Pts RK 1 MTL 6 EDM 2 MTL 1 MTL 6 CGY 20 CGY 14 OTT 8 CGY 65 1 2 HAM 10 MTL 2 HAM 2 EDM 17 WPG 18 WPG 10 HAM 6 HAM 37 2 3 BC 11 CGY 4 SSK 3 CGY 18 HAM 17 HAM 8 CGY 5 MTL 34 3 4 SSK 11 BC 6 BC 4 BC 24 EDM 15 EDM 7 EDM 5 OTT 33 4 5 EDM 12 WPG 6 OTT 4 HAM 24 MTL 14 MTL 7 MTL 4 WPG 28 5 6 CGY 13 SSK 7 EDM 5 SSK 25 OTT 14 TOR 5 TOR 4 EDM 26 6 7 WPG 14 HAM 8 WPG 6 WPG 33 TOR 10 BC 4 WPG 4 SSK 17 7 8 OTT 16 OTT 11 CGY 7 OTT 45 BC 7 SSK 3 BC 3 BC 16 8 9 TOR 26 TOR 14 TOR 7 TOR 73 SSK 4 OTT 2 SSK 0 TOR 9 9 * Turnovers do not include interceptions ** Points after Takeaways or fumbles lost on two-point converts (due to no new series of downs) CANADIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE ™ July 29, 2019 2019 CFL STATISTICS RUSHING & PASSING RANKINGS RUSHING YARDS RUSHING ATTS AVG GAIN RUSH RUSHING TDS OPP RUSH YARDS OPP RUSH ATTS OPP AVG RUSH OPP RUSH TDS RK Team Tot Avg Team Tot Team Avg YdsTeam TD Team Tot Avg Team Tot Team Avg YdsTeam TD RK 1 MTL 805 161.0 SSK 159 MTL 6.4 SSK 12 WPG 378 63.0 WPG 83 CGY 3.9 EDM 2 1 2 WPG 801 133.5 EDM 140 WPG 6.1 HAM 8 EDM 504 84.0 MTL 95 WPG 4.6 SSK 2 2 3 SSK 788 131.3 WPG 132 HAM 5.0 MTL 7 CGY 541 90.2 EDM 98 OTT 4.8 WPG 2 3 4 EDM 642 107.0 MTL 126 SSK 5.0 WPG 6 SSK 548 91.3 SSK 105 BC 5.0 CGY 6 4 5 OTT 571 95.2 OTT 120 OTT 4.8 CGY 5 MTL 510 102.0 HAM 115 EDM 5.1 MTL 7 5 6 HAM 543 90.5 BC 117 BC 4.6 EDM 5 BC 761 108.7 CGY 137 SSK 5.2 TOR 7 6 7 BC 538 76.9 HAM 109 EDM 4.6 OTT 5 HAM 666 111.0 TOR 147 MTL 5.4 HAM 8 7 8 CGY 437 72.8 CGY 100 CGY 4.4 BC 4 OTT 717 119.5 OTT 149 TOR 5.7 BC 9 8 9 TOR 338 56.3 TOR 78 TOR 4.3 TOR 0 TOR 838 139.7 BC 152 HAM 5.8 OTT 9 9 PASSING YARDS PASS ATTEMPTS COMPLETIONS COMPLETION % OPP PASS YARDS OPP PASS ATTS OPP COMPLNS OPPT COMPL % RK Team Tot Avg Team Att Team Com Team % Team Tot Avg Team Att Team Com Team % RK 1 EDM 1931 321.8 EDM 238 EDM 170 SSK 71.7 EDM 1067 177.8 EDM 155 EDM 88 WPG 56.6 1 2 CGY 1841 306.8 BC 229 BC 151 EDM 71.4 CGY 1451 241.8 SSK 185 SSK 129 EDM 56.8 2 3 HAM 1775 295.8 TOR 222 CGY 150 CGY 70.4 SSK 1458 243.0 MTL 197 WPG 129 HAM 59.5 3 4 TOR 1752 292.0 CGY 213 HAM 143 WPG 69.5 WPG 1546 257.7 TOR 198 HAM 131 SSK 69.7 4 5 SSK 1592 265.3 HAM 207 TOR 141 HAM 69.1 BC 1849 264.1 OTT 200 MTL 138 MTL 70.1 5 6 WPG 1500 250.0 OTT 202 WPG 132 BC 65.9 HAM 1601 266.8 CGY 208 TOR 142 TOR 71.7 6 7 BC 1668 238.3238.3 WPG 190 OTT 128TOR TOR 63.563.5 TOTORR 1873
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mountaineers in the Pros
    MOUNTAINEERS IN THE PROS Name (Years Lettered at WVU) Team/League Years Stedman BAILEY ALEXANDER, ROBERT (77-78-79-80) Los Angeles Rams (NFL) 1981-83 Los Angeles Express (USFL) 1985 ANDERSON, WILLIAM (43) Boston Yanks (NFL) 1945 ATTY, ALEXANDER (36-37-38) New York Giants (NFL) 1948 AUSTIN, TAVON (2009-10-11-12) St. Louis Rams (NFL) 2013 BAILEY, RUSSELL (15-16-17-19) Akron Pros (APFA) 1920-21 BAILEY, STEDMAN (10-11-12) St. Louis Rams (NFL) 2013 BAISI, ALBERT (37-38-39) Chicago Bears (NFL) 1940-41,46 Philadelphia Eagles (NFL) 1947 BAKER, MIKE (90-91-93) St. Louis Stampede (AFL) 1996 Albany Firebirds (AFL) 1997 Name (Years Lettered at WVU) Name (Years Lettered at WVU) Grand Rapids Rampage (AFL) 1998-2002 Team/League Years Team/League Years BARBER, KANTROY (94-95) BRAXTON, JIM (68-69-70) CAMPBELL, TODD (79-80-81-82) New England Patriots (NFL) 1996 Buffalo Bills (NFL) 1971-78 Arizona Wranglers (USFL) 1983 Carolina Panthers (NFL) 1997 Miami Dolphins (NFL) 1978 Miami Dolphins (NFL) 1998-99 CAPERS, SELVISH (2005-06-07-08) BREWSTER, WALTER (27-28) New York Giants (NFL) 2012 BARCLAY, DON (2008-09-10-11C) Buffalo Bisons (NFL) 1929 Green Bay Packers 2012-13 CARLISS, JOHN (38-39-40) BRIGGS, TOM (91-92) Richmond Rebels (DFL) 1941 BARNUM, PETE (22-23-25-26) Anaheim Piranhas (AFL) 1997 Columbus Tigers (NFL) 1926 CLARKE, HARRY (37-38-39) Portland Forest Dragons (AFL) 1997-99 Chicago Bears (NFL) 1940-43 BARROWS, SCOTT (82-83-84) Oklahoma Wranglers (AFL) 2000-01 San Diego Bombers (PCFL) 1945 Detroit Lions (NFL) 1986-87 Dallas Desperados (AFL) 2002-03 Los
    [Show full text]
  • Edmonton Football Team's Decision to Change Name Scores with Most
    Edmonton football team’s decision to change name scores with most Canadians, but not with most CFL fans More than half of CFL fans and Alberta residents say it was the wrong choice to end use of ‘Eskimos’ August 7, 2020 – After years of debate The team will no longer be called the over the use of Indigenous names and ‘Eskimos’. Do you think this was the right imagery in sports, and amid threats from sponsors of withdrawn support, the decision or the wrong decision? Edmonton Canadian Football franchise 59% 59% will change its name. 57% 55% 45% 43% 41% 41% Across the country, teams in varsity, minor, and professional leagues have been doing the same in recent years. The latest study from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute finds a majority of Canadians supportive of the decision. CFL Fans Not that Don't care about But while 57 per cent of Canadians say (n=320) interested in CFL CFL at all dropping the name was the right choice, (n=382) (n=817) the same cannot be said for CFL fans. Total (n=1,519) Interest level More than half of those who follow the league (55%) say the name should have Right decision Wrong decision stayed. METHODOLOGY: The issue generates division across a The Angus Reid Institute conducted an online survey from July 23 number of demographics. Men under 35 – 24, 2020 among a representative randomized sample of 1,519 largely are onside with the franchise’s Canadian adults who are members of Angus Reid Forum. For decision, while men 55 and over lean the comparison purposes only, a probability sample of this size would other way.
    [Show full text]
  • Team Standings 1887-2017:Layout 1
    Québec Rugby Football Union Junior Series 1887-89 1887 First Round Lincoln College Rugby Club 5 Britannia III Football Club 3 Montréal AAA III 8 McGill University Football Club III 2 Bishop College Rugby Club bye Second Round Montréal AAA III 10 Bishop College Rugby Club 0 Third Round Nov 5 at Montréal Montréal AAA III 8 Lincoln College Rugby Club 4 1888 First Round Bishop College Rugby Club 12 Lennoxville College Rugby Club 2 Victoria Football Club II 16 Montréal High School 2 Montréal AAA III 20 McGill University Football Club III 5 Britannia III Football Club 8 McGill Model College 1 Second Round Victoria Football Club II 43 Bishop College Rugby Club 0 Britannia III Football Club 11 Montréal AAA III 1 Third Round Oct 20 at Montréal Britannia III Football Club 5 Victoria Football Club 0 1889 First Round Victoria Football Club III 30 Britannia III Football Club 4 McGill University Football Club III 11 Montréal High School Rugby Club 0 Second Round McGill University Football Club III 19 Victoria Football Club III 9 Third Round Oct 26 at Montréal McGill University Football Club III 10 Montréal AAA III 8 Ontario & Québec Junior Series 1890-1906 Junior Québec Rugby Football Union 1890 First Round McGill University Football Club III 16 Montréal AAA III 0 Second Round Oct 19 *Britannia III Football Club 14 McGill University Football Club III 7 McGill protested win citing game official recorded incorrect scoring. Game was declared a draw and QRFU Executive ordered the game replayed Replay Oct 25 at Montréal McGill University Football Club III
    [Show full text]
  • 1959:A Curious Case of the 13Th Import
    The Professional Football Researchers Association A Curious Case of the 13th Import The 1959 CFL Saskatchewan Roughriders By Bob Braunwart and Bob Carroll Quick! What major league pro football team went into a regular tailback as coach. Filchock's first move was to import another season game with the LEAST chance of winning? The 1976 American, former Notre Dame All-America Frank Tripucka, to do Tampa Bay Buccaneers? The 1960 Dallas Cowboys? Perhaps the his quarterbacking. 1943 Chicago Cardinals, a mob so mopey that the players had faces redder than their jerseys? Although these fabled Frank Tripucka is better known today as the father of Kelly aggregations managed to stumble through their seasons without Tripucka, the pro basketballer, but back then he was a talented once tripping over victory, they each had a mathematical chance of signal caller and passer. By the time he got to Canada, Frank was winning every time they were able to find their way out of the locker a proven commodity, having seen service with several NFL teams room before kickoff. They had at least a prayer. before coming north. He had a knack for the big play, and he could handle pressure. At South Bend he'd succeeded all-time Irish great The only major pro team ever to trot out onto the field with Johnny Lujack at QB in the late 1940's and kept the team absolutely no -- read that "zero" -- chance of triumph was the 1959 undefeated for still another year. Once Filchock installed him as the Saskatchewan Roughriders of the Canadian Football League.
    [Show full text]
  • The Migration of African Americans to the Canadian Football League During the 1950S: an Escape from Discrimination?
    IASE/NAASE Working Paper Series, Paper No. 07-13 The Migration of African Americans to the Canadian Football League during the 1950s: An Escape from Discrimination? Neil Longley†, Todd Crosset††, and Steve Jefferson††† June 2007 Abstract The institutional racial discrimination that existed in American professional team sports prior to World War II resulted in African American players effectively being barred from playing in the major professional leagues. Although the NFL color barrier did officially fall in 1946, to be quickly followed by the fall of the MLB color barrier one year later when Jackie Robinson made his debut for the Brooklyn Dodgers, these events were just the beginning of the struggles for African American athletes. Integration proceeded very slowly during the next two decades, and economists have shown that African Americans continued to suffer from a variety of forms of discriminatory treatment. However, it is the argument of this paper that the literature that examines discrimination during this era is incomplete, in that it ignores the experiences of a small, but relatively significant, group of African American football players who actually chose to leave their own country – and correspondingly leave the racially-charged environment of mid-20th century America – to head north to play professional football in the Canadian Football League (CFL). †Department of Sport Management, Isenberg School of Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, Phone (413): 545-5059, e-mail: [email protected] ††Department of Sport Management, Isenberg School of Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003 †††Department of Sport Management, Isenberg School of Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003 Beginning in 1946, a steady flow of African Americans began to migrate to the CFL which, at the time, was a legitimate competitor league to the NFL.
    [Show full text]
  • CFL Register QB Special
    CANADIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE HISTORY CFL QUARTERBACKS: 1958 TO 2019 CFL CAREER: CFL CAREER CFL CAREER PASSING STATISTICS TO 2018: Player Pos School First Last Teams Yr GP GS Att Com Pct Yards Int TD LG 300 ADAMS JR, Vernon QB Oregon 2016 2019 Ham, Mtl 3 38 4 111 59 53.2 803 2 4 45 0 ADAMS, Joe QB Tennessee State 1982 1984 Ssk, Ott 3 30 17 740 391 52.8 5,342 30 31 88 7 ALLEN, Damon QB Cal State - Fullerton 1985 2007 Edm, Ott, Ham, Mem, BC, Tor 23 370 304 9,138 5,158 56.4 72,381 278 394 109 65 BANKS, Brad QB Iowa 2004 2008 Ott, Wpg, Mtl 5 56 2 179 98 54.7 1,195 10 9 85 1 BARRETT, Danny QB Cincinnati 1983 1998 Cgy, Tor, BC, Ott 14 163 90 3,078 1,656 53.8 23,419 93 135 83 27 BISHOP, Michael QB Kansas State 2002 2011 Tor, Ssk, Wpg 9 129 50 1,492 760 50.9 11,774 76 66 86 9 BRADY, Marcus QB Cal State - Northridge 2002 2008 Tor, Ham, Mtl 7 107 11 469 246 52.5 3,321 16 15 78 1 BRIDGE, Brandon QB South Alabama 2015 2018 Mtl, Ssk 4 63 6 322 211 65.5 2,485 8 13 75 0 BURRIS, Henry QB Temple 1997 2016 Cgy, Ssk, Ham, Ott 18 277 229 7,452 4,649 62.4 63,639 227 373 100 93 BUTLER, Ian 'Rocky' QB Hofstra 2002 2007 Ssk, Tor 6 86 6 242 130 53.7 1,832 13 8 80 1 CATO, Rakeem QB Marshall 2015 2016 Mtl 2 30 16 432 296 68.5 3,570 11 17 65 2 CRANDELL, Marcus QB East Carolina 1997 2008 Edm, Cgy, Ssk 11 153 64 2,339 1,297 55.5 17,227 88 86 80 14 DAVIS, Dominique QB East Carolina 2015 2019 Wpg, Ott 4 65 2 93 57 61.3 750 1 3 55 0 DEWALT, Roy QB Texas - Arlington 1980 1988 BC, Wpg, Ott 9 139 99 3,130 1,803 57.6 24,147 96 132 90 24 DOUGLAS, Karl QB Texas A & I 1973 1975
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 CFL DRAFT GUIDE Thursday, May 2, 2019
    2019 CFL DRAFT GUIDE Thursday, May 2, 2019 8:00pm ET | 5:00pm PT #CFLDraft TABLE OF CONTENTS 2019 CFL Draft Selection Order 1 2019 CFL Draft Selection Trade Summary 3 2018 CFL Draft 6 CFL Draft Historical Recap 8 CFL Draft Historical Notes 10 First Round Draft Selections by Year Since 2004 11 Draft Summary Since 2004 13 Overall Draft Selections by School Since 2004 15 First Round Draft Selections by School Since 2004 17 Draft Selections by Team Since 2004 20 First Overall Draft Selections Since 1981 21 Schools with Most First Overall Picks Since 1952 22 CFL Career Game Leaders since 1959 (Drafted Players) 23 A Short History of the Canadian Draft 25 Eligible Players – 2019 CFL Draft 27 CONTACT INFORMATION Olivier Poulin Lucas Barrett Canadian Football League Canadian Football League Director, Communications & Public Affairs Manager, Communications & Public Affairs P: 514-970-7211 P: 416-802-7852 [email protected] [email protected] Steve Daniel Canadian Football League Director, Game Information & Head Statistician P: 778-878-5570 [email protected] #CFLDraft 2019 CFL DRAFT SELECTION ORDER As of April 25th, 2019 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 1. Toronto 1. Toronto Montréala 2. Hamilton via MTL 2. Hamilton 3. Hamilton 3. Edmonton 4. Edmonton 4. Winnipeg via BC 5. Montréal via BC 5. Winnipeg 6. Winnipeg 6. Saskatchewan 7. Saskatchewan 7. Ottawa 8. Montréal via OTT 8. Calgary 9. Calgary 10. Torontob 11. Montréalb ROUND 3 ROUND 4 1. Toronto 1. Toronto 2. Montréal 2. Montréal 3. Hamilton 3. Calgary via HAM 4. Toronto via EDM 4. Edmonton 5.
    [Show full text]
  • CFL F1. Now, on a Lighter Note, We Have a Few Final Questions About
    CFL F1. Now, on a lighter note, we have a few final questions about professional sports. How closely do you follow each of these professional sports leagues? [Randomize - Rows] NHL – National Hockey League CFL – Canadian Football League NFL – National Football League MLB – Major League Baseball NBA – National Basketball Association MLS – Major League Soccer Very closely – I watch as many games as I can Closely - I try to watch my favourites and stay up-to-date Not very closely – I don’t watch much, maybe a playoff game I don’t really follow this sport at all F2. Thinking now about the CFL - are you planning to watch the Grey Cup this year on November 30th from Vancouver? Yes, will watch No, won’t watch Depends on who is in it Not sure/Might or might now F3. Which statement best describes your view? The Grey Cup defines Canadian culture and identity The Grey Cup is an important part of Canadian culture and identity The Grey Cup isn’t really a big factor in Canadian culture and identity The Grey Cup is just a game and has nothing to do with Canadian culture and identity [Exclude those who say they don’t follow CFL at all – Skip to F6] F4. Thinking about the Canadian Football League over time would you say : The CFL is a lot more exciting today than it was five years ago The CFL is a little more exciting than it was five years ago The CFL is exactly the same as it was five years ago The CFL is a little more boring than it was five years ago The CFL is a lot more boring than it was five years ago F5.There are nine teams in the Canadian Football League today.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 CFL DRAFT GUIDE Tuesday, May 4, 2021
    2021 CFL DRAFT GUIDE Tuesday, May 4, 2021 7:00pm ET | 4:00pm PT #CFLDraft TABLE OF CONTENTS 2021 CFL Draft Changes 1 2021 CFL Draft Selection Order 2 2021 CFL Draft Selection Trade Summary 3 2020 CFL Draft 4 CFL Draft Historical Recap 6 CFL Draft Historical Notes 8 First Round Draft Selections by Year Since 2006 9 Draft Summary Since 2006 11 Overall Draft Selections by School Since 2006 13 First Round Draft Selections by School Since 2006 15 Draft Selections by Team Since 2006 18 First Overall Draft Selections Since 1982 19 Schools with Most First Overall Picks Since 1952 20 CFL Career Game Leaders since 1959 (Drafted Players) 22 A Short History of the Canadian Draft 24 Eligible Players – 2021 CFL Draft 26 CONTACT INFORMATION Olivier Poulin Lucas Barrett Canadian Football League Canadian Football League Senior Director, Communications & Public Affairs Director, Communications & Public Affairs P: 514-970-7211 P: 416-802-7852 [email protected] [email protected] Steve Daniel Jeff Krever Canadian Football League Canadian Football League Director, Game Information & Head Statistician Head, Player & Game Statistics P: 778-878-5570 P: 613-697-5324 [email protected] [email protected] #CFLDraft 2021 CFL COMBINES AND DRAFT CHANGES 2021 CFL COMBINES PRESENTED BY NEW ERA WENT VIRTUAL Due to COVID-19, combine testing, football drills and interviews were conducted remotely, using video and online tools. For this year only, this approach replaced the traditional in-person gathering of young prospects and football personnel from the league’s nine member clubs. These modifications appl to all CFL combines (Global, Regional and National) and to all prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • Bc Lions Football Club Community Partnerships
    BC LIONS FOOTBALL CLUB COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS CODE OF CONDUCT October, 2019 1. Context This Code of Conduct ("Code") has been adopted by the BC Lions Community Partnerships Division as part of an overall set of conduct-related policies applicable to the Club itself, its directors, officers, players, employees, and volunteers. In so far as the players, coaches and other team staff are concerned, this Code should be read in conjunction with and supplementary to the code of conduct adopted by the CFL, the CFL constitution and the collective bargaining agreement entered into between the CFL and the Canadian Football League Players Associations ("CFLPA"). Where this Code conflicts with the code of the CFL or the CFLPA collective bargaining agreement, that code and that agreement shall prevail. The CFL code principally addresses conduct occurring on the football field or during or related to a football game event. This Code is intended to have a wider application. It is recognized that no written code of conduct can cover every situation; rather, the standards of conduct set out in this Code are stated in broad terms, indicating the general direction and rules by which conduct should be measured. It is expected that all personnel will comply with the spirit as well as the letter of this Code of Conduct. Where any person whose conduct is subject to this Code has any doubt about whether a particular course of action may or may not breach the Code, that person shall have access to the Club's President, General Manager and Director of Community Partnerships as may be appropriate in the circumstances, for advice and consultation in order to determine the appropriate course of action.
    [Show full text]
  • Football, Nationalism, and Protectionism: the Federal Defence of the Canadian Football League
    Football, Nationalism, and Protectionism: The Federal Defence of the Canadian Football League by John Valentine A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Canadian Studies Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2016 John Valentine ii Abstract In 1974, Canada’s Liberal minority government acted to protect the Canadian Football League (CFL) from competition by introducing Bill C-22, which promised harsh penalties for anyone operating a football franchise connected to a foreign-based league or team. This legislation was the culmination of a series of measures by which the government had protected the CFL in the early 1960s and 1970s. A number of factors combined to prompt government involvement. From its earliest days, Canadian football was a nationalist concern. The desire to create a distinctly Canadian pastime led early organizers to differentiate it from English rugby and American football by developing and defending distinctive rules for the game. Football associations developed as domestic rather than cross-border organizations, fostering a congruence of the national territory and the Canadian version of the game. The organizational structure of Canadian football reinforced the east-west axis of transcontinental transportation and communications infrastructure fostered by the state since Confederation. Team and regional rivalries became a staple of print and radio news and commentary, integrating football into the national discourse. Following the Second World War, the identification of Canadian football with the Canadian nation intensified as televised games provided fans with more shared experiences of the only Canadian sports league.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Canadian Football
    PHYSICAL CULTURE AND SPORT. STUDIES AND RESEARCH DOI: 10.2478/v10141-012-0006-3 Snow on the Gridiron: A Brief History of Canadian Football Authors’ contribution: Curtis Fogel A) conception and design of the study Lakehead University - Orillia, Canada B) acquisition of data C) analysis and interpretation of data D) manuscript preparation E) obtaining funding ABSTRACT Football is played throughout the far regions of the world. There is no other sport that brings so many people together locally, nationally, and internationally. Football is not, however, a unified sport with shared rules, customs and histories across time and space. In contrast, football is largely a different sport depending on where it is being played. This paper traces the development of Canadian football as a unique sport with strong similarities to and subtle differences from American football, as well as clear distinctions from forms of football played outside of North America. KEYWORDS football, sport, history, Canada Introduction The term football can refer to different sports depending on the geographic, cultural, and historical location in which it is being played. Football, for many individuals around the world, refers to a game that involves kicking a ball into the goal of an opposing team. This sport is commonly referred to as soccer in North America. In Australia, the term football denotes a game that involves pushing a ball up an oval shaped field by kicking, handballing, and running, with the end objective of kicking the ball through the goal posts of the opposing team (Piesse 1995). In Ireland, a form of football termed Gaelic football is played that involves a combination of carrying, kicking, and hand-passing a ball with the objective of kicking the ball through the uprights of the opposing team to score one point, or through the goal posts of the opposing team for three points (Mahon 2001).
    [Show full text]