DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Evidence Submitted by Retail NI (NIP0020)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Evidence Submitted by Retail NI (NIP0020) Written evidence submitted by Retail NI (NIP0020) Retail NI Submission to NI Affairs Select Committee Inquiry on Brexit and NI Protocol Introduction: Retail NI is Northern Ireland’s business organisation for local wholesalers and independent retailers. Our membership also includes a significant numbers of suppliers to our sector which enables us to give a unique perspective on the operation of the protocol. Our membership is varied and includes independent retailers of all kinds but also key wholesalers such as Henderson Group, Musgrave, NISA, Costcutter, Co-op, Savage and Whitten and companies such as Applegreen and Circle K. This submission includes a number of recommendations and three wholesaler case studies on the operation of the protocol. Retail NI Recommendations: The broader business community in Northern Ireland needs stability, certainty and simplicity with the operation of the Protocol. We need outcomes and solutions which work for hard-working families to ensure they have full choice of food and other products on an affordable basis. An extension of the Grace period, alongside renewed focus on a long-term solution to the Protocol problems, which ensures free and fettered trade between GB and NI. UK alignment with the EU’s agri-food sanitary and phytosanitary standards. European Commission reopen an office in Belfast to facilitate ongoing contacts, deal with protocol problems and assist Northern Ireland maintaining existing EU networks and to build new relationships. The Northern Ireland Executive enhance its Brussels Office and ensure it has a dynamic EU engagement program alongside Invest NI. Case study 1: Henderson Group Responses: What effect, if any, the Protocol has had on the availability of food products in Northern Ireland retailers? The main focus of businesses throughout the food supply chain is to create and implement systems and processes to ensure the most efficient and effective methods of continued food supply in NI, and as such the following issues have been seen in the run up to and since the implementation of the Protocol. The finalising of the “Deal” and implementation of the protocol so late in the day before the festive period has caused a number of issues within the supply chain especially for “fresh food product” suppliers. The reluctance of suppliers to adapt processes in readiness for the Protocol has led to a number of challenges within the industry, which are still being felt now some 4 weeks into the new process. Recent weeks have shown this to be the case with GB suppliers in particular. The uncertainty of what exactly was required by suppliers and the lack of guidance in time to implement required changes prior to the 1st January has meant that certain GB suppliers have stopped NI supply which in turn has caused availability issues within the NI markets as suitable product alternatives needed to be sourced from the Island of Ireland at relatively short notice. The industry has experienced delays in product deliveries due to paperwork checks at Ports, sometimes up to 2 -3 days product shelf-life loss – this in turn can cause further problems down the supply chain when product is despatched out of warehouse to retail shelves as consumers have come to expect longer shelf-life. Business systems which operate “Just in time” deliveries have experienced product shortages due to these delays. Another significant impact caused by the implementation of the protocol was that the availability of “Groupage Transport” effectively disappeared overnight due to implications caused by seals, sign off and additional paperwork requirements being too detailed for many smaller product suppliers to deal with. The costs associated with product supply via non- groupage methods have meant that smaller product suppliers have been priced out of the supply chain and in turn meant that there could have been product shortages on the shelves had wholesale businesses not stockpiled products prior to the Festive period. Businesses have experienced challenges to service levels, with an average of up to 12% decrease in service level when compared against the same period last year. This significant decrease of service level could have proved catastrophic to the Retail industry leaving empty shelves had businesses not stockpiled products before the implementation of the protocol, with ambient products being hit the hardest as priority at Ports is being given to fresh and frozen foods. Only due to diligent planning prior to and throughout the implementation of the protocol have businesses been able to maintain their outbound service levels at levels similar to that of the same time period last year. What impact, if any, the end of the ‘grace period’ for agri-food goods on 1 April may have on the food supply chain; The end of the “grace period” will no doubt cause further delays in the food supply chain with loads being held up at Ports due to paperwork issues and further, more in-depth product inspections being carried out at Point of entry to NI. Further delays in the supply chain process will not only result in more product wastage due to shortening of shelf-life due to processing issues and delivery vehicles being held up at ports, but it will also affect product pricing, as the cost of implementing the required changes and processing of certificates etc will need to be recouped by the supplier; therefore it will inevitably end up with the consumer footing the bill as per example below: “Ware potatoes from GB are subject to phytosanitary and plant health documentation. This is slowing down the supply chain considerably, loads are taking several days to receive the green light from TTS. Due to this delay, when moving potatoes, a much longer timescale must be factored in from ordering to arrival. Currently due to the 'Grace Period' there are no extra costs. From 1st April when this ends there will be an additional cost of £150 per load for this documentation which equates to approximately £5 per ton.” Another example of increasing costs now includes additional charges in relation to suppliers having to provide heat treated pallets and additional labelling to satisfy legislative requirements this can add up to an additional £40 per pallet of goods ordered. These additional charges are currently being described as transitional costs to cover the rework of current stocked items; therefore, it is likely that a deduction in additional charges will occur in the coming months when stocks deplete and are replaced with fresh stock. With the added tariffs now being applied to certain product ranges being imported from GB from alternative origins, NI consumers will see price rises on their everyday grocery items. Industry officials are currently looking at ways to ensure that additional costs passed on to end consumers are kept to a minimum to ensure competitive pricing within the retail environment, but ultimately the additional costs need to be recouped to ensure the supply chain is maintained at financially viable levels. As was evident in the first few days of the Protocol implementation, lack of training and awareness caused a number of teething problems, within an already fragile nervous industry, questions are being asked as to what plans government departments have in place to prevent such issues arising again when the “Grace Period” ends on the 1st April. As there has been a zero-tolerance approach to errors on critical paperwork – this has led to hold ups at Ports to allow the errors to be rectified. Those which have not been able to be rectified have seen loads rejected for sailing or held so long that the shelf-life reduction of products has deemed them unfit to delivery. Availability of resources could lead to further issues down the line – with limited numbers of trained professionals within the food industry, which could in turn see shortfalls in production with Technical Staff from the industry being recruited to facilitate checks at ports. This point also relates to Environmental Health Office staff and Veterinary Officers. In preparation of the supply chain facing more issues with delays at Ports due to paperwork checks, suppliers have already started to investigate and implement changes in their processes to enable them to streamline the overall flow of goods. One such change which has been felt by consumers in NI since 1st January is that product ranges in retail stores have reduced significantly, limiting customer choice. This reduction in product range has been implemented to limit the effect of product unavailability being passed on to the consumer and prevent chaos within the retail sector caused by consumer panic buying. How supply chains have adapted to the new arrangements, and how they might do so in the future; Supply chains are still adapting! Most of the adaptations come within the route to market. Supply chain models have had to change where possible from the “Just in Time” model to a more contingency method where product is sourced and stored weeks in advance to avoid disruption to supply. Obviously, this change in process can only be applied to certain sectors of the Food Supply Chain – such as Ambient and Frozen products. Fresh Food products which cannot be sourced and stored weeks in advance are a different matter and have meant that businesses have had to rethink their supply chain. Some businesses pre-empted the disruption which has ensued at the ports over the recent weeks and prior to the Protocol being implemented had switched the majority of their fresh product supplier to the Island of Ireland supply where possible, or at the very least, have a contingency supply agreement in place with ROI suppliers for products currently sourced from GB. Direct shipment of loads from the Continent to ROI on existing routes and through brand new routes have seen a significant increase in recent weeks as businesses are trying to redirect the supply chain to avoid travelling through GB where at all possible, as a method of stream-lining and simplifying the delivery process.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Does Food Retail Access Influence Dietary Intake?
    Does food retail access influence dietary intake? Martin White A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Medicine (MD) School of Health & Population Sciences College of Medical & Dental Sciences University of Birmingham February 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The extent to which the food retail environment, including the availability, price and quality of foodstuffs, has an impact on what people eat remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether the retail environment, of a household‟s usual main food store or of the area surrounding the home, is independently associated with the dietary intake of individual householders. The study employed a cross-sectional design and comprised simultaneous surveys of all retail outlets selling foodstuffs, and of households and the individuals living in them in the city of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK in 2000-2002. 5044 adults aged 16-97 years living in 3153 households provided data, including a 134-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and detailed socio-demographic information. Detailed data on 33 commonly consumed foods was obtained from 560 food stores.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Forecourt Retail Market
    Fuel Forecourt Retail Market Grow non-fuel Are you set to be the mobility offerings — both products and Capitalise on the value-added mobility mega services trends (EVs, AVs and MaaS)1 retailer of tomorrow? Continue to focus on fossil Innovative Our report on Fuel Forecourt Retail Market focusses In light of this, w e have imagined how forecourts w ill fuel in short run, concepts and on the future of forecourt retailing. In the follow ing look like in the future. We believe that the in-city but start to pivot strategic Continuously pages w e delve into how the trends today are petrol stations w hich have a location advantage, w ill tow ards partnerships contemporary evolve shaping forecourt retailing now and tomorrow . We become suited for convenience retailing; urban fuel business start by looking at the current state of the Global forecourts w ould become prominent transport Relentless focus on models Forecourt Retail Market, both in terms of geographic exchanges; and highw ay sites w ill cater to long customer size and the top players dominating this space. distance travellers. How ever the level and speed of Explore Enhance experience Innovation new such transformation w ill vary by economy, as operational Next, w e explore the trends that are re-shaping the for income evolutionary trends in fuel retailing observed in industry; these are centred around the increase in efficiency tomorrow streams developed markets are yet to fully shape-up in importance of the Retail proposition, Adjacent developing ones. Services and Mobility. As you go along, you w ill find examples of how leading organisations are investing Further, as the pace of disruption accelerates, fuel their time and resources, in technology and and forecourt retailers need to reimagine innovative concepts to become more future-ready.
    [Show full text]
  • Export Marketing Consultancy Project BA (Hons) International Business
    Leeds Beckett University/BI Norwegian Business School Export Marketing Consultancy Project BA (Hons) International Business Tutor: Gareth Williams Authors: Kristina Linnea Johansson Brunvall Ole Johannes Gill Lunde Maiken Salmelid Sondre Larsson Richard Lindin Victoria Ekeli Date: 07th of May 2015 Plagiarism declaration “We certify with the signatures that this is our own work. Material from other sources has been properly acknowledge and referenced. The work has not, in whole or in part, been presented elsewhere for assessment. If this statement is untrue we acknowledge that we have committed an assessment offence. We also certify that we have taken a copy of this assignment, to make available upon request, which we will retain after the board of examiners has published results.” Researchers Kristina Linnea Johansson Brunvall Ole Johannes Gill Lunde Richard Lindin Victoria Ekeli: Maiken Salmelid Sondre Larsson 2015-Consultancy report 2 Introduction This report is a comprehensive study for the module Export Marketing at Leeds Beckett University. Through cooperation with the Norwegian grocery store company KIWI Mini Pris AS, the report will present the findings of a thorough market analysis of the UK grocery store market. It will include secondary findings through data collection and will be supported by primary research that the researchers have collected and analysed. Secondary data will be elements on what is currently happening in the market. Elements evaluated are current and future trends, customer needs and behaviour, external macro/micro environmental factors, competitors operating in the market and entry mode possibilities. Primary data methods include in-store and online observation, 3 expert interviews as well as semi-structured interviews conducted in the streets of Leeds to base findings found with customer’s opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • Checking out on Plastics, EIA and Greenpeace
    Checking out on plastics A survey of UK supermarkets’ plastic habits ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT EIA ABOUT GREENPEACE CONTENTS We investigate and campaign against Greenpeace defends the natural We would like to thank The Network ©EIAimage 1. Executive summary 4 environmental crime and abuse. world and promotes peace by for Social Change, Susie Hewson- investigating, exposing and Lowe and Julia Davies. Our undercover investigations 2. Introduction 5 confronting environmental abuse expose transnational wildlife crime, We would would also like like to to thank thank our ABOUT EIA EIAand championingUK responsible with a focus on elephants, pangolins 3. Impacts of plastics on the environment and society 6 numerous other supporters whose 62-63solutions Upper for Street, our fragile Ximporae. Ut aut fugitis resti ut atia andWe investigate tigers, and and forest campaign crimes suchagainst long-term commitment to our Londonenvironment. N1 0NY UK nobit ium alici bla cone consequam asenvironmental illegal logging crime and and deforestation abuse. 4. Methodology 8 organisation’s mission and values T: +44 (0) 20 7354 7960 cus aci oditaquates dolorem volla for cash crops like palm oil. We helped make this work possible. Our undercover investigations E: [email protected] vendam, consequo molor sin net work to safeguard global marine Greenpeace, Canonbury Villas, London N1 5. Results of scorecard ranking 9 expose transnational wildlife crime, eia-international.org fugitatur, qui int que nihic tem ecosystems by addressing the 2PN, UK with a focus on elephants and asped quei oditaquates dolorem threats posed by plastic pollution, T: + 44 (0) 20 7865 8100 6. Summary of survey responses tigers, and forest crimes such as volla vendam, conseqci oditaquates bycatch and commercial EIAE: [email protected] US illegal logging and deforestation for dolorem volla vendam, consequo exploitation of whales, dolphins POgreenpeace.org.uk Box 53343 6.1 Single-use plastic packaging 10 cash crops like palm oil.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Retailers
    1 1. Contents 1. Contents ............................................................................................................. 2 2. Executive summary .............................................................................................. 3 Background and methodology ..................................................................................... 3 Key findings ............................................................................................................. 3 3. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 5 Research objectives ................................................................................................... 5 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 5 Sample .................................................................................................................... 5 Participation criteria .................................................................................................. 8 Fieldwork ................................................................................................................. 8 Presentation of results ............................................................................................... 9 Respondent profile .................................................................................................. 10 4. Supply arrangements and local competition .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Grocery Market
    The grocery market The OFT's reasons for making a reference to the Competition Commission May 2006 OFT845 © Crown copyright 2006 This publication (excluding the OFT logo) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. CONTENTS Chapter Page Executive summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Market definition 5 3 Market structure 9 4 Price, quality, range and service 24 5 Pricing behaviour 30 6 Buyer power 46 7 Planning and land holdings 56 8 Final decision on a reference 68 9 Scope and terms of reference 80 Annexe A Terms of reference 87 B Summary of consultation responses 88 C Supermarkets Code of Practice 89 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided to make a reference to the Competition Commission (CC) under section 131 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (the Act) for an investigation into the supply of groceries by retailers in the UK.1 This confirms the OFT's Proposed Decision, which was published on 9 March 2006, and on which the OFT publicly consulted. The OFT has based its decision on evidence of market developments and features of the market that might be preventing, restricting or distorting competition and thereby harming consumers. In deciding to make a reference, the OFT has taken account of the views expressed by respondents to the consultation, particularly in relation to the evidence and analysis set out in the Proposed Decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Opportunities for Funding/Support
    LOCAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR FUNDING/SUPPORT LOCAL LOTTERIES The district councils run a weekly lottery with 60% of ticket sales going directly to support local good causes. Links as below: Chiltern and South Bucks Lottery - https://www.chilternsouthbuckslottery.co.uk/ Vale Lottery - https://www.valelottery.co.uk/ Wycombe Lotto - https://www.wycombelotto.co.uk/ SUPERMARKET DONATIONS ASDA GREEN TOKEN GIVING Asda Foundation Green Token giving provides funding for local charities and good causes nominated by customers and colleagues. https://www.asdafoundation.org/green-token-giving CO-OP LOCAL COMMUNITY FUND 1% of what members spend on selected own brand products at a Co-op Store goes to the Co-op Local Community Fund. Applications to be a local cause open again in Spring 2018. https://www.coop.co.uk/membership/local-community-fund NISA Making a difference locally (MADL) is a charity launched to help independently run local stores to add value to their communities through donations. Once the stores have a pot of money they can find out what causes the community cares about and donate to them. http://www.nisalocally.co.uk/community/make-a-difference-locally Nov 2017 SAINSBURY’S Every year Sainsbury’s work together with customers and colleagues to support a local cause in the local community. These partnerships last for a whole year and include a range of support including awareness raising, fundraising in store, volunteering and donations. https://www.sainsburyslocalcharity.co.uk/ TESCO Each store holds a community budget to help support with requests for local fund-raising events (see Community Champions below). https://www.tescoplc.com/little-helps-plan/places-communities/supporting-local-communities/ WAITROSE Each branch has a Community matters champion who finds out about potential beneficiaries to benefit from the token scheme based at each store.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Change: a Consideration of the UK Food Retail Industry, 1950-2010. Phd Thesis, Middlesex University
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Clough, Roger (2002) Retail change: a consideration of the UK food retail industry, 1950-2010. PhD thesis, Middlesex University. [Thesis] This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/8105/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Op RNS FINAL 24.04.2020
    24 April 2020 Annual Results Announcement: 52 Weeks to 4 th Jan 2020 Co-operation is working Total revenue up 7%, underlying profits up 50% like for like 1 Six years continued like-for-like sales growth in Food £76m returned to members and local causes Business plays critical role in ensuring community resilience through coronavirus Co-op difference highlights • Creation of further member and community value, with £76m returned – £59m to members directly; £17m to 4,400 local causes chosen by members and colleagues. More than £260m paid to members and communities over last three years • Active membership at 4.6m; successful focus on driving young membership, with 36% of new members aged 35 or under • Issued £300m sustainable bond, with proceeds used to drive Food’s Fairtrade offer, ensuring better deal for producers • Pension Fund combines strength with sustainability: defined benefit surplus in excess of £1.8 billion; £22m invested in affordable housing; £320m defined contribution assets switched into specialist climate change fund • A further £1.2m invested into Co-op Academy schools in 2019, as part of a four year commitment to invest £3.6m; six new schools opened, taking total to 24 at year end; plans to grow to 40 in next two years • Further development of award-winning Safer Colleagues, Safer Communities campaign; launch of NightClub initiative to improve wellbeing of night shift workers – directly tackling issues to support colleagues • Launched community strategy around Spaces, Skills, Sustainability and Wellbeing: o Uses almost
    [Show full text]
  • The Top 25 Temperature-Controlled Logistics Operators
    The Top 25 temperature-controlled logistics operators Produced by Cold Chain News in association with The firsT Cold Chain news lisTing of The Top 25 TemperaTure-ConTrolled TransporT and logisTiCs providers in briTain and ireland - april 2012. Many of the UK’s large temperature-controlled non-food items such as home-wares and specialist Ice Pak in January last year. October 2010 was “exceptional”. operators sounded an optimistic note for 2011 electricals. “This purchase and previous acquisitions – “Our pre-tax profits for the year to 31 October and are upbeat about prospects for this year, Harry Yearsley, managing director, Yearsley Innovate and Celcius – require a programme of 2010 went up 26.5% to £2.8m from £2.2m the despite the gloomy economic backdrop. Group, says: “We store and distribute a lot of integration which, as it comes to an end, will previous year. Turnover also increased 11.8% to Revenues for the sector’s top 25 players have frozen stock on behalf of local manufacturers and allow us to further improve efficiency through £25.7m from £23m and total warehouse risen by slightly over 10% year on year, but importers using the Humber ports, and we increased consolidation and a reduction in utilisation for the year was 91% - up from 79% in although this is well ahead of inflation, a good realised many of them also have a requirement delivery miles,” says managing director Harry the previous year.” part of that turnover increase has come from for dry goods storage. Rather than split their Yearsley. Grocott says that the growth can be attributed ambient rather than chilled or frozen business.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Details: Quarter 4 2016 Brand Name Annex Introduction
    Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues in Food (PRiF) Sample details: Quarter 4 2016 brand name annex Introduction Where the brand name of a sample is given the produce involved may have been on sale in other retail premises at the same time. The description and country of origin are taken from labelling on the food or at the point of sale. The country of origin of processed food may not be the country where the unprocessed produce was produced. This is true even of food that has undergone minimal processing, such as meat that has been butchered or frozen vegetables. Samples with residues above the MRL are in bold, green text. UK samples with residues of pesticides not approved for use on that food in the UK in bold, blue text Organic samples with residues of pesticides not permitted for use in organic food production are in bold text Some brand name details have been withheld – these will be published once enquiries are complete. Contents Section Page Section Page Non-dairy Milk 82 Samples for which RASFFs were submitted 2 Okra 86 Pasta 90 Apples 3 Peaches & Nectarines 94 Apricots 6 Pears 98 Beans with Pods 12 Peppers 101 Bread 16 Popcorn 104 Breakfast Cereal 26 Pork 107 Cabbage 35 Pork (processed) 112 Cashew Nuts 38 Potatoes 119 Cheese (buffalo, goats & ewes) 43 Prepared Fresh Fruit 125 Cooked Meat 47 Rye 127127 Fish (sea) 50 Rye Flour 129 Grapefruit 52 Speciality Vegetables 133 Grapes 59 Strawberries 136 Leeks 65 Tomatoes 139 Lettuce 68 Tomatoes (tinned) 143 Milk 71 Wine 145 Samples
    [Show full text]
  • Message to Shoppers
    MESSAGE TO SHOPPERS We would like to assure shoppers that our members; your local convenience stores, are doing their best to keep products available to you at this extremely difficult time for everyone. Please be kind to them; they are doing their best and putting themselves on the front-line to help you – the consumer! Because our retailers are community based, not only may they be in a position to offer goods which you can no longer buy in the supermarkets; they may be able to help those who are most vulnerable but offering local deliveries. For those of you who aren’t sure of where your local store is, we’ve pulled together a list of these. Simply click on the store finder links below to help you source your nearest retailer: BEST ONE https://www.best-one.co.uk/store-locator CO-OP https://finder.coop.co.uk/food COSTCUTTER https://www.costcutter.co.uk/location-finder/ COSTCO https://www.costco.co.uk/store-finder DAY-TODAY https://www.day-today.co.uk/shops/ FAMILTY SHOPPER https://www.familyshopperstores.co.uk/our-stores FARMFOODS https://www.farmfoods.co.uk/store-finder.php GO LOCAL http://www.golocalextra.co.uk/ KEYSTORE https://www.keystore.co.uk/store-locator/ LIFESTYLE EXPRESS https://www.localstore.co.uk/stores/83092/lifestyle-express/ LONDIS https://www.londis.co.uk/our-stores MACE https://www.macestores.co.uk/ MORRISON’S https://my.morrisons.com/storefinder/ FORECOURTS MCCOLLS https://www.mccolls.co.uk/ MARGIOTTA http://www.margiotta.co.uk/contact NISA https://www.nisalocally.co.uk/ ONE STOP https://www.onestop.co.uk/ ONE-O-ONE http://one-o-one.co.uk/stores/ PREMIER https://www.premier-stores.co.uk/our-stores SCOTMID https://scotmid.coop/store-locator/ SPAR https://www.spar.co.uk/ U-SAVE http://www.usave.org.uk/locations/ .
    [Show full text]