DOCSLIB.ORG

A Distributional Checklist of the Birds of Michigan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Distributional Checklist of the Birds of Michigan MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 164 A Distributional Checklist of the Birds of Michigan Robert B. Payne Museum of Zoology and Division of Biological Sciences The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Ann Arbor MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN March 28, 1983 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 164 The publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan consist of two series-the Occasional Papers and the Miscellaneous Publications. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. The Occasional Papers, publication of which was begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, which include papers on field and museum techniques, monographic studies, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, are separately. It is not intended that they be grouped into volumes. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Birds, Fishes, Insects, Mammals, Mollusks, and Reptiles and ~rn~hibiansis available. Address inquiries to the Director, Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48 109. MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 164 A Distributional Checklist of the Birds of Michigan Robert B. Payne Museum of Zoology and Division of Biological Sciences The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Ann Arbor MUSEUM OF ZOOL,OGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN March 28, 1983 PAGE 1N'I'IZOI)UCI'ION ............................................................... I NAMES ......................................................................... 1 1)EI;INITIONS OF TERMS ....................................................... I SOURCES OF INFORMATION ...................................................2 SUMMARY OF THE BIRDS ...................................................... 3 A<:KNOWLEL)GMENTS .......................................................... 3 CIIECKI.IST .................................................................... 4 RE.JE:C'I'EI) SPE(:IES ............................................................. 62 L.II'EIRt\ fURK (:I ['EL) ........................................................... 63 INDEX .......................................................................... 65 89 87 85 83 ONTARIO WISCONSIN Map of Michigan inclicatirlg the couritics IN'I'KODUCTION 'I'his checklist is a summary of the occurrence, breeding status, migra- tion, and distribution of birds in Michigan. Used with one of the popular field guides to North American birds, the checklist should be helpful in identifying birds in the Geld most likely to be seen in Michigan. All species known to occur in the state and docurnented with speci- mens, photographs, or tape recordings are included in the checklist. I have accepted only the birds known in the past or at the present time from these permanent reference sources. Museum specimens are the primary sources of information about bird species, and they are the original reference mater-ial used in distributional works and field guides.- In recent years the biology and distribution of birds have increasingly been determined with field observations, and museum collecting is done only under special cir- cumstances. Most recent infhrmation on birds in Michigan is from field observations. NAMES The common names follow the American Ornithologists' Union Committee on Classifica- tion and Nomenclature (AOU, 1982). For scientific names and sequence I follow the AOU (1982) cxcept Sor the herons where I follow the rlarnes and sequence in Payne (1979). Sub- species names are included only whcrc thcy differ from those in Zirnmerman and Van Tyne (19.50) (referred to here as ZVT) or where recent changcs in the recognized species call for further comment. DEFINITIONS 01;TERMS The list includes the migratory and breeding status of Michigan birds and the seasons of occurrence and their regularity and abundance. Introduced birds and exotics are included only if they have established breeding populations in the wild in Michigan. An asterisk (*) indicates a known breeding record in Michigan. Those birds not represented by specimens, recognizable photographs, tape recordings, or verified banding recoveries are included in brackets and are regarded as hypothetical. The categories used to describe status are: (1) vagrant, one to four records for the state; (2) occasional, 540 records; (3) uncommon, sparse population but usually seen in every year; (4) common, regularly occurring in the state in numbers in every year in suitable habitat. Estimates of population numbers of breeding birds are included where available, as are the migration routes and wintering areas determined from recovcrics of banded birds. "Tran- sient" indicates that the species occurs in migration, but unless noted otherwise it does not nest in tllc state. "Summer resident" indicates that the species occurs in Michigan during the brecding season and that most or all individuals migrate out of the state during the colder timc of year. "Regular" birds are seen every year or nearly every year. "Irregular" birds are seen in some years but not in others. "Irruptive" birds occur in large numbers in some years and usually few or none in other years; these are mainly wintering visitors from the northern coniferous forests. "Hypotheticals" are those species reported only as sight records but not documented with specimens or photographs. Several of these are reasonable identifications and are supported by detailed written field descriptions. Further field work likely will confirm their occurrence with good photographs or museum specimens. I have not included in the checklist the species whose occurrence was doubted by Barrows (ISI'L), Swales (1!)13), Wood (1951), or %vr- whoever reviewed the species most I-ecently-unless more recent observations were available. Other lists also were consulted (Gibbs, 1879; Tordoff, 1966, 1'973;.lanson and Ryel, 1975). At rhe end of the list are a few "rejected" species whose occurrence is doubtful. "Northern Michigan" refers to the country north of a line from the Grand Valley to Saginaw Bay and includes both the Upper Peninsula and the nol-thern 1.ower Peninsula. "Southern Michigan" includes the area to the south. This division marks the northern or southern ranges of breeding populations ofsevel-al birds, and it corresponds approximately to rhe southel-n limit of extensive tracts of coniferous forests in the 01-iginal natural vegetation of Michigan (Kiichler, 1964). SOURCES OF INFOKMATION Information on the occurrence and status 01' Michigan birds was gathered ftom museurn collections, photographs, and both published and unpublished tield observations. The docu- mentation for species is given mainly where few records are known or where recent observa- tions show a change in the range or status Unless noted otherwise at least 5 specimens of each species are known from Michigan. Most are in the collections of the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology (UMMZ). Included are the rnuseum specimen numbers, localities, and dates for those species with only 1-5 specimens. Details are given for species known frorn photographs, tape recordings, or only 1-2 specimens in addition to the photographs or tape recordings. Photographs and tape recordings are generally suitable as pet-rnanent records of the oc-currence of a species. But the qu;~lityof photos and tapes varies, and usr~allywe cannot use them to determine the bird's subspecific identity or otherwise examine them in detail. In preparing the checklist I have used Barrow's "Michigan Bird Life" (1912), Wood's "Birds of Michigan" (1951). and Zimmerman and Van I'yne's "Check-list of the birds of. Michigan" (195'9) as a guide to specirnena, though except where noted 1 examined all speci- mens myself. Birds in private collections and in high school collections years ago in some cases have disappeared. The local collection of Miller Ernpey is now in the Freeland <:ommunity Schools. Remnants of the historically importarit Clarence K. Uarron collec:tion in Niles remain in the Fort St. Joseph Museum and in Niles Senior High School, but most of these early specimens have been discarded. Bird collections of the Sault Ste. Marie Public Schools and of Olivet College, described in part by Barrows (1912) and Wood (lglil), have since been dis- carded (J. F. Ingold, in litt., L. <:. Holcornb, in litt., UMMZ). Kal-e or noteworthy specirrierls and documents should be placed in a permanent university museum c-ollection. The list also includes intbrmation from bird specimens in Andrews University at Berrien Springs (AU), Central Michigan University (CMU), Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago (FMNH), the Empey collection (Freeland Community Schools), Grand Rapids Public Museum (including Kent Scientific Museum) (GKPM), Hope College Museum of Zoology (MCMZ), Kalamazoo Nature Center (KNC) (Pettingill collection, Kalama~ooCollege (KCS) collection, and the Michigan Audubon Society (MAS) collection), Michigan State University (MSU), Fort St. Joseph Museum (Niles), Niles Public Schools, Royal Ontario Museum (ROM), the University of Michigan Biological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Michigan Stocking Report 2010
    Lake Michigan Committee Meeting Ypsilanti, Michigan March 23-24, 2011 Salmonid Stocking Totals for Lake Michigan 1976-2010 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Green Bay National Fish & Wildlife Conservation Office 2661 Scott Tower Drive New Franken, WI 54229 The Great Lakes Fishery Commission’s fish stocking database is designed to summarize federal, provincial, state, and tribal fish stocking events. This database contains agency provided records dating back to the 1950’s and is available online at: (http://www.glfc.org/fishstocking/). The purpose of this report is to briefly summarize the information in the GLFC database for Lake Michigan federal lake trout stocking and stocking rates of all salmonids within state waters of Lake Michigan (Table 1). A summary of lake trout stocking locations, described by priority area in A Fisheries Management Implementation Strategy for the Rehabilitation of Lake Trout in Lake Michigan (Dexter et al. 2011), is also included (Figure 1, Table 2). Total numbers of Service stocked lake trout are shown by statistical district for the time series 1976 – 2010 in Table 3 while salmonid stocking totals for each state are described in Tables 4-7 (Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan, respectively). 2 Figure 1. Map showing the first and second priority stocking areas contained in the new lake trout restoration guide and implementation strategy. Figure 1. First and 2nd priority areas as described in A Fisheries Management Implementation Strategy for the Rehabilitation of Lake Trout in Lake Michigan (Dexter et al. 2011). 3 2010 stocking overview: 12.3 million salmonids (combined species) were stocked in Lake Michigan in 2010, (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Petroleum Plays and Characteristics of the Michigan Basin
    DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A summary of petroleum plays and characteristics of the Michigan basin by Ronald R. Charpentier Open-File Report 87-450R This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Denver, Colorado 80225 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION.............................................. 3 REGIONAL GEOLOGY.......................................... 3 SOURCE ROCKS.............................................. 6 THERMAL MATURITY.......................................... 11 PETROLEUM PRODUCTION...................................... 11 PLAY DESCRIPTIONS......................................... 18 Mississippian-Pennsylvanian gas play................. 18 Antrim Shale play.................................... 18 Devonian anticlinal play............................. 21 Niagaran reef play................................... 21 Trenton-Black River play............................. 23 Prairie du Chien play................................ 25 Cambrian play........................................ 29 Precambrian rift play................................ 29 REFERENCES................................................ 32 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Index map of Michigan basin province (modified from Ells, 1971, reprinted by permission of American Association of Petroleum Geologists)................. 4 2. Structure contour map on top of Precambrian basement, Lower Peninsula
    [Show full text]
  • What Climate Change Means for Michigan
    August 2016 EPA 430-F-16-024 What Climate Change Means for Michigan Michigan’s climate is changing. Most of the state has Heavy Precipitation and Flooding warmed two to three degrees (F) in the last century. Changing the climate is likely to increase the frequency of floods in Heavy rainstorms are becoming more frequent, and Michigan. Over the last half century, average annual precipitation in ice cover on the Great Lakes is forming later or melting most of the Midwest has increased by 5 to 10 percent. But rainfall sooner. In the coming decades, the state will have during the four wettest days of the year has increased about 35 more extremely hot days, which may harm public percent. During the next century, spring rainfall and annual precipitation health in urban areas and corn harvests in rural areas. are likely to increase, and severe rainstorms are likely to intensify. Each Our climate is changing because the earth is warming. of these factors will tend to further increase the risk of flooding. People have increased the amount of carbon dioxide in the air by 40 percent since the late 1700s. Other heat-trapping greenhouse gases are also increasing. These gases have warmed the surface and lower atmosphere of our planet about one degree during the last 50 years. Evaporation increases as the atmo- sphere warms, which increases humidity, average rainfall, and the frequency of heavy rainstorms in many places—but contributes to drought in others. Heavy rains and snowmelt flooded the Tittabawassee River in Midland in April Greenhouse gases are also changing the world’s 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Michigan Part 1 a Publication of the Great Lakes Sport Fishing Council May 2019 Vol
    Inland Seas Angler GREAT LAKES BASIN REPORT Special Report – Lake Michigan Part 1 A Publication of the Great Lakes Sport Fishing Council May 2019 http://www.great-lakes.org Vol. 30, No. 5.3a Highlights of the Annual Lake Committee Meetings Great Lakes Fishery Commission proceedings, Ypsilanti, MI This third of a series of annual special reports is a two-part summary of Lake Michigan. This lake committee report is from the annual Lake Committee meetings hosted by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission in March 2019. We encourage reproduction with the appropriate credit to the GLSFC and the agencies involved. Our thanks to IL DNR, IN DNR, MI DNR; USFWS; USGS and the many other DNR biologists who make this all happen, and also thanks to the staffs of the GLFC and USGS for their contributions to these science documents. Thanks also to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, its staff, Bob Lamb & Marc Gaden, for their efforts in again convening and hosting the Lake Committee meetings in Ypsilanti, MI. Lake Michigan – Part 1 Index of Reports Status and Trends of Prey Fish Populations in Lake Michigan, 2018 (USGS) pgs 2 – 10 Summary of 2018 Salmonine Stocking in Lake Michigan pgs 10 – 12 Harvest of Fishes from Lake Michigan during 2018 pgs 12 – 19 Status of Yellow Perch in Lake Michigan, 2018 pgs 20 – 22 Highlights . Age distribution of alewives remained truncated with no alewife age exceeding 5 years . Bloater biomass was 2.60 kg/ha in 2018, unchanged from 2017, but still only 14% of the long-term average. Round goby biomass was 1.25 kg/ha in 2018, the 3rd largest estimate in the time series .
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Connecting Channels, Widening and Deepening Bends in the St
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS WIDENING AND DEEPENING BENDS IN THE ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN (PHASE III) Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District Detroit, Michigan March 1974 STATEMENT OF FINDINGS GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS WIDENING AND DEEPENING BENDS IN ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN PHASE III SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 1. I have reviewed and evaluated, in light of the overall public interest, the documents concerning the proposed action, as well as the stated views of other interested agencies and the concerned public, relative to the proposed dredging project on the connect­ ing channel waterway of the St. Marys River. 2. The River and Harbor Act of 1956 (P.L. 434, 84th Congress) pro­ vided for a safe vessel draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic with a least channel width of 300 feet. Authority for inclusion of design and construction of the bend widening projects for the St. Marys River into the existing Great Lakes Channels Authorization was granted by the Chief of Engineers on 12 December 1967, subject: Great Lakes Connecting Channels, Widening and Deepening Bends in the St. Marys and St. Clair Rivers. 3. The continued well-being of tire St. Marys River is a matter of great concern to a wide scope of interests, whether they be commer­ cial, conservational, or recreational. The needs of waterborne commerce in terms of the project were carefully and objectively weighed against the potential impacts on the environment as well as the valid objections of concerned individuals and organizations. All phases of the project have been and continue to be coordinated with the appropriate Federal, State and local agencies having perti­ nent responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Great Lakes Charts Catalog Reference
    Charts on the Great Lakes and Adjacent Waters 96° 94° Data On the Great Lakes System Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE 14500 Great Lakes—Lake Champlain to Lake of the Woods 1:1,500,000 14847 Toledo Harbor 1:20,000 14915 Little Bay de Noc 1:30,000 GENERAL LAKE DIMENSION SUPERIOR MICHIGAN HURON ST. CLAIR ERIE ONTARIO ST. LAWRENCE RIVER Entrance Channel 1:40,000 14916 SMALL-CRAFT BOOK CHART Length in miles 350 307 206 26 241 193 14770 Morristown, N.Y. to Butternut Bay, Ont. 1:15,000 14848 Detroit River 1:30,000 Lake Winnebago and Lower Fox River (book of 34 charts) Various 14850 Lake St. Clair 1:60,000 14917 Menominee and Marinette Harbors 1:15,000 14500 Breadth in miles 160 118(1) 183(2) 24 57 53 14771 Butternut Bay, Ont., to Ironsides lsland., N.Y. 1:15,000 Length in coastline (including islands) 2,730 1,640 3,830(3) 257 871 712 14772 Ironsides lsland, N.Y., to Bingham lsland, Ont. 1:15,000 14852 St. Clair River 1:40,000 14918 Head of Green Bay, including Fox River below De Pere 1:25,000 Area in square miles 14773 Gananoque, Ont., to St. Lawrence Park. N.Y. 1:15,000 Head of St. Clair River 1:15,000 Green Bay 1:10,000 1450 Water Surface, United States 20,600(4) 22,300(5) 9,150(6) 198(7) 4,980 3,560(8) 14774 Round lsland, N.Y., and Gananoque, Ont., to Wolfe l., Ont.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder-Suicide Ruled in Shooting a Homicide-Suicide Label Has Been Pinned on the Deaths Monday Morning of an Estranged St
    -* •* J 112th Year, No: 17 ST. JOHNS, MICHIGAN - THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 1967 2 SECTIONS - 32 PAGES 15 Cents Murder-suicide ruled in shooting A homicide-suicide label has been pinned on the deaths Monday morning of an estranged St. Johns couple whose divorce Victims had become, final less than an hour before the fatal shooting. The victims of the marital tragedy were: *Mrs Alice Shivley, 25, who was shot through the heart with a 45-caliber pistol bullet. •Russell L. Shivley, 32, who shot himself with the same gun minutes after shooting his wife. He died at Clinton Memorial Hospital about 1 1/2 hqurs after the shooting incident. The scene of the tragedy was Mrsy Shivley's home at 211 E. en name, Alice Hackett. Lincoln Street, at the corner Police reconstructed the of Oakland Street and across events this way. Lincoln from the Federal-Mo­ gul plant. It happened about AFTER LEAVING court in the 11:05 a.m. Monday. divorce hearing Monday morn­ ing, Mrs Shivley —now Alice POLICE OFFICER Lyle Hackett again—was driven home French said Mr Shivley appar­ by her mother, Mrs Ruth Pat­ ently shot himself just as he terson of 1013 1/2 S. Church (French) arrived at the home Street, Police said Mrs Shlv1 in answer to a call about a ley wanted to pick up some shooting phoned in fromtheFed- papers at her Lincoln Street eral-Mogul plant. He found Mr home. Shivley seriously wounded and She got out of the car and lying on the floor of a garage went in the front door* Mrs MRS ALICE SHIVLEY adjacent to -• the i house on the Patterson got out of-'the car east side.
    [Show full text]
  • Misery Bay Chapter 2
    Existing Conditions The first step in developing a plan to protect the coastal resources of Misery Bay is to establish an accurate representation of existing cultural and environmental features within the study area. This chapter will present a series of maps and associated text to describe key features such as owner type, land uses, vegetation cover types, soils and geology. NEMCOG used information and digital data sets from the Center for Geographic Information, State of Michigan, Michigan Resource Information System, Alpena Township, Alpena County, Natural Resource Conservation Service, and U.S. Geological Survey. Information from the Alpena County Master Plan and Alpena Township Master Plan was used to develop a profile of existing conditions. Field surveys were conducted during 2003. Community Demographics Trends in population and housing characteristics can provide an understanding of growth pressures in a community. Population trends from 1900 and 2000 are summarized in Table 2.1. Population levels have risen and fallen twice in the last 100 years, first in the early part of the century and again in the 1980’s. The 1980 US Census recorded the largest population for Alpena Township and Alpena County at 10,152 and 32,315 respectively. During the 80’s decade, population fell by over five percent and has not climbed back to the 1980 US Census level. Table 2.1 Population Trends Alpena Township and Alpena County, 1900-2000 Alpena Township Alpena County Year Population % Change Population % Change 1900 1,173 --- 18,254 --- 1910 928 -20.9% 19,965 +9.4% 1920 701 -24.5% 17,869 -10.5% 1930 813 +16.0% 18,574 +3.9% 1940 1,675 +106.0% 20,766 +11.8% 1950 2,932 +75.0% 22,189 +6.9% 1960 6,616 +125.6% 28,556 +28.7% 1970 9,001 +36.0% 30,708 +7.5% 1980 10,152 +12.8% 32,315 +5.2% 1990 9,602 -5.4% 30,605 -5.3% 2000 9,788 +1.9% 31,314 +2.3% Source: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Geography of Saginaw, Michigan
    Wayne State University Wayne State University Theses 1-1-1933 The rbU an Geography of Saginaw, Michigan Dennis Glenn Cooper Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_theses Part of the Geography Commons, History Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Cooper, Dennis Glenn, "The rU ban Geography of Saginaw, Michigan" (1933). Wayne State University Theses. Paper 465. This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. THE URBAN GEOGRAPHY OF SAGINAW, MICHIGAN A Thesis SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE COLLEGES OF THE CITY OF DETROIT IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS. BY Dennis Glen Cooper Detroit, Michigan 1933 t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s I. O u t l i n e ...................... ill II. List of maps, graphs, ana pictures............. vi III. THE URBAN GEOGRAPHY OF SAG INAL, MICHIGAN. 1 IV. Appendix . .......... « . .... 59 V. Bibliography ....................... • 62 f ii THE URBAN GEOGRAPHY OF SAGINAW, MICHIGAN. Outline Page A. Outstanding characteristics of the city............ • 1 1, Unusual landscape pattern with tvvc distinct nuclei 2. Industrial development in transition stage between period of extractive activities and diversified industries B. General situation: the Saginaw Basin • *.*•••* 2 1. Topography 2. Soil 3* Climate 4, Natural resources 5, Drainage C* Site • 4 1* Position of glacial moraine crossing valley 2. Bluff cut in moraine at outer bend and on west side of river 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967
    19 SEP 2021 Index 543 Au Sable Point 14863 �� � � � � 324, 331 Belle Isle 14976 � � � � � � � � � 493 Au Sable Point 14962, 14963 �� � � � 468 Belle Isle, MI 14853, 14848 � � � � � 290 Index Au Sable River 14863 � � � � � � � 331 Belle River 14850� � � � � � � � � 301 Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Res- Belle River 14852, 14853� � � � � � 308 cue System (AMVER)� � � � � 13 Bellevue Island 14882 �� � � � � � � 346 Automatic Identification System (AIS) Aids Bellow Island 14913 � � � � � � � 363 A to Navigation � � � � � � � � 12 Belmont Harbor 14926, 14928 � � � 407 Au Train Bay 14963 � � � � � � � � 469 Benson Landing 14784 � � � � � � 500 Acadia Rock 14967, 14968 � � � � � 491 Au Train Island 14963 � � � � � � � 469 Benton Harbor, MI 14930 � � � � � 381 Adams Point 14864, 14880 �� � � � � 336 Au Train Point 14969 � � � � � � � 469 Bete Grise Bay 14964 � � � � � � � 475 Agate Bay 14966 �� � � � � � � � � 488 Avon Point 14826� � � � � � � � � 259 Betsie Lake 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agate Harbor 14964� � � � � � � � 476 Betsie River 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agriculture, Department of� � � � 24, 536 B Biddle Point 14881 �� � � � � � � � 344 Ahnapee River 14910 � � � � � � � 423 Biddle Point 14911 �� � � � � � � � 444 Aids to navigation � � � � � � � � � 10 Big Bay 14932 �� � � � � � � � � � 379 Baby Point 14852� � � � � � � � � 306 Air Almanac � � � � � � � � � � � 533 Big Bay 14963, 14964 �� � � � � � � 471 Bad River 14863, 14867 � � � � � � 327 Alabaster, MI 14863 � � � � � � � � 330 Big Bay 14967 �� � � � � � � � � � 490 Baileys
    [Show full text]
  • State of Michigan
    MICHIGAN The Status of Lighthouses MICHIGAN’S LIGHTHOUSES November 1998 NAME S TATI O N LIGHT OTHER IMPORTANT DATES NATIONAL REGISTER COUNTY NEAREST SITING LOCATION DESCRIPTION OWNERSHIP LESSEE OPEN TO PUBLIC EST. CONST. CITY 1 Alpena Light Station 1877 1914 Determined eligible by USCG; Alpena Alpena Breakwater NE side of entrance to U.S.C.G. No SHPO concurs 2 AuSable (Big Sable) Light Station 1874 1874 1909-Addition to keeper’s house Listed 5/23/78 Alger Grand Marais Land based On AuSable Point, W U.S.C.G. Of Grand Marais 3 Beaver Island (Beaver Head) Light Station 1851 1858 1866-Keeper’s house const. Listed 12/29/78 Charlevoix St. James Land based S. Shore of Beaver Island Charlevoix P.S. 4 Beaver Island Harbor (St. James) Light Station 1852 1870 Determined eligible by USCG; Charlevoix St. James Land based N side of entrance to Beaver U.S.C.G. SHPO concurs Island Harbor 5 Bete Grise (Mendota) Light Station 1870 1895 Keweenaw Bete Grise Land based S. Side of entrance to Mendota Private No Canal 6 Big Bay Point Light Station 1896 1896 Listed 10/12/88 Marquette Big Bay Land based Big Bay Point, 24 miles Big Bay B & B Grounds (11-4) Tower NW of Marquette 1st Sunday, no Children 7 Big Sable Point (Grande Pt. AuSable) Light Station 1867 1867 1900-Tower encased in steel; 1905- Listed 8/4/83 Mason Ludington Land based Big Sable Pt. 8 miles NW U.S.C.G. Big Sable Pt. Light- watchroom encased of Ludington House Keepers Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakefront & Beach Access Study Report Bay City State
    April 2015 Approved April 27, 2015 Michigan DNR Parks and Recreation Division Final Draft for approval July 8, 2014 Bay County Prepared with the assistance of: www.clearzoning.com Intentionally blank RESOLUTION NO. 04-2015-01 MICHIGAN STATE PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MSPAC) RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE “BAY CITY RECREATION AREA LAKEFRONT & BEACH ACCESS STUDY” ADOPTED: WHEREAS, an extensive planning process was initiated in partnership with Bay County government to identify strategies to enhance the beach recreation value to enhance tourism. WHEREAS, the study was jointly funded by DNR Parks and Recreation and Bay County, WHEREAS, the process included public surveys and meetings and other stakeholder opportunities to develop recommendations, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the MSPAC support the recommendations in the plan for the DNR Parks and Recreation Division to use as a guide for future investments to enhance Bay City Recreation Area. Submitted by: Chris Graham, Chair, MSPAC Stewardship Subcommittee Motioned by: Commissioner Mary Pitcher Yeas: -13- Seconded by: Commissioner Mike Foote Nays: - 0- Abstained: -0 Absent: -2- This resolution was adopted by the Michigan State Parks Advisory Committee at their April 9, 2015 meeting as Resolution No. 04-2015-01. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Chapter 1: Purpose, Vision and Goals Chapter 2: Planning Team Expertise & Assessments 2.1 Meeting Overviews 2.2 Lakeshore Tour Outcomes 2.3 Changing Ecology of Saginaw Bay Chapter 3: Legal Review/Guiding Resources 3.1 Legal Mandates Review
    [Show full text]