DOCSLIB.ORG

A Detailed Study of Landslide and Debris Flow Source Areas in the Northern Colorado Front Range Arana-Morales, Ashlyann 1, Baum, Rex 2, Godt, Jonathan 2 (1) Dept

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Detailed Study of Landslide and Debris Flow Source Areas in the Northern Colorado Front Range Arana-Morales, Ashlyann 1, Baum, Rex 2, Godt, Jonathan 2 (1) Dept A detailed study of landslide and debris flow source areas in the northern Colorado Front Range Arana-Morales, Ashlyann 1, Baum, Rex 2, Godt, Jonathan 2 (1) Dept. of Geology, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, and RESESS Internship at UNAVCO, Boulder, CO [email protected] (2) U.S. Geological Survey, 1711 Illinois Street, Golden, Colorado` 80401 [email protected], [email protected] Introducon Using informaon obtained in the GIS database the two pie charts below illustrate the vegetaon and geomorphic sengs Landslides contribute to erosion and landscape evoluon of the landslides in the area of Boulder and Eldorado Springs. and constute common natural hazards and acve 0% Figure 1: Example of debris flows landslide processes. In September 2013 nearly connuous rainfall cause by the rainfall, September 11-13. 3% occurred causing flooding and widespread landslides and Located in the west part of Boulder in a dip slope area. debris flows in the northern Colorado Front Range. Sparse Trees Whereas previous studies have idenfied erosion as the Burn most common process leading to debris flow in the 37% mountains of northern Colorado, nearly all of the debris 53% Grass flows mapped in this event began as small, shallow Heavy Trees landslides. 7% Above treeline Methods Figure 5: This pie chart shows the vegetaon that tends to surround the Exisng maps of landslide locaons in the Boulder and landslides in this part of Colorado; sparse trees and grass are the most Eldorado Springs quadrangles were improved by adding common vegetaon types. !(!( details to show outlines of sources areas as well as transport !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( 1% !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( and deposion zones. !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( ¯ !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( ¯ !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( 25% !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( Boulder !( !(!( Open Slope !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( Swale !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( 74% !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( Bould!(er!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( (a) (b) Channel !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( Figure 3: Fieldwork was conducted in northern Colorado to measure dimensions and record characteriscs of some of the landslides source !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( areas shown on the maps. Google Earth images showing the locaon of the landslide that we studied in Boulder and Eldorado Springs !( !( !( !(!( ¯ !( quadrangle. (a) Locaon of landslide studied in the Boulder area. (b) Landslides locaon visited in the Eldorado Spring area. !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( Eldorado Spring!(s !( !( Figure 6: This second pie chart shows the frequency of geomorphic !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( Eldorado Springs !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( sengs where the landslides occurred. In this case they are more likely !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( to occur on a open slope. !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( Discussion !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( Although we observed no obvious differences between the Figure 1: The exisng maps had points at the top of landslide scarps and (a) (b) (c) (d) travel lines showing how far they ran out. We started with a database of !( source areas and surrounding non-landslide areas, we noted Figure 4: Observed characteriscs included topographic curvature, proximity to rock outcrops, and geologic materials exposed in the landslide 1350 landslides points where 265 point were located in el Boulder source areas. In addion, observaons in non-source area of similar slope and storm rainfall were conducted to record characteriscs in those several characteriscs that the source areas have in common. quadrangle and 150 were located in the Eldorado Springs quadrangle. areas, and determine the differences between source areas and nonsource areas. Subsequently, the observaons were analyzed and Slope of the source areas ranged from 28° to 35° and most summarized to indicate which detailes observed in the field might explain why landslides occurred where they did and why they did not occur Mapping was performed using a Geographic Informaon occurred on planar or slightly concave slopes that were in other similar areas. (a) Measuring the length of the landslide. (b) Determining the width of the landslide. (c) Quanfying the depth of the vegetated with grass, small shrubs and few trees. The source System (GIS) with satellite imagery and topographic data. landslide. (d) Making observaon of the geological material exposed in the surface of the landslide. areas were shallow and elongated downslope: width ranged High-resoluon satellite imagery acquired shortly aer the !( !( !( !( from 4 to 9 m, length from 6 to 40 m and depth ranged from 0.7 September 2013 floods along with pre-event and post-events !( Results topographic map data. to 1.2 m. Colluvium was the source material for all of the We studied the source areas of six debris flows in northern Colorado. Four were in the Pinebrook Hills area, on the Boulder debris flows and bedrock was exposed in the basal surface of ¯ ¯ 7.5-minute quadrangle, and the other two were near Gross Reservoir on the Eldorado Springs 7.5-minute quadrangle. Each the source areas. We observed no evidence for concentrated of the debris flows started as shallow landslides. surface runoff upslope from the sources. The characteriscs !( Dimensions Landslide 1 Landslide 2 Landslide 3 Landslide 4 Dimensions Landslide 5 Landslide 6 Latude 40.04553 N 40.0475 N 40.0475 N 40.0481 N Latude 39.9461 N 39.9478 N and dimensions of the shallow landslide source areas of these !( !( Longitude 105.29856 W 105.2988 W 105.2988 W 105.2988 W Longitude 105.3481 W 105.3478 W debris flows are consistent with either localized weakness of !( Landslide Type Shallow translaonal Shallow translaonal Shallow translaonal Shallow translaonal Landslide Type Shallow translaonal Shallow translaonal the colluvium, localized pore-pressure build-up during rainfall Boulder Eldorado Springs Geological materials Siltstone and shale Sandstone Siltstone and shale Shale Geological materials Granite Fine to medium-grained granite !( !( !( Vegetaon Grass Grass Grass Grass infiltraon, or both. Local topographic and geologic details and Vegetaon small shrubs, aspen trees and sparse grass Shrubs, aspen and pine trees and grass !( Length 10.6 m 7.1 m 6.45 m 5.63 m !( Length 16.3 m 40 m colluvium heterogeneity probably contributed to these. Width 7.5 m 6.5 m 7.05 m 4.47 m Width 8.9 m 8.3 m Depth 1.2 m 1.1 m 0.78 m 0.77 m !( !( Depth 0.69 m 1.1 m Acknowledgements !( Slope angle 28° 35° 33° 33° !( !( Slope angle 34° 32° !( !( Source material Colluvium, contain poorly Colluvium Colluvium Colluvium !( sorted sand and angular Source Material Colluvium derived from local bedrock Colluvium gravel Geomorphology Open dip slope Open and dip slope Open dip slope Open dip slope, slight swale Geomorphology Open slope at the mouth of a broad swale Open slope RESESS, UNAVCO, USGS, ExxonMobil, NSF (a) (b) Shape elongated downslope, Circle Irregular circle Irregular rectangle Shape elongated, irregular rectangle elongated, irregular rectangle rectangle Figure 2:The satellite imagery had previously been orthorecfied so that (a) (b) References objects visible in the imagery appeared n their correct spaal locaons. Polygons were made around each landslide to outline the source and Table 1:(a) Observaons of the four landslides studied in the Boulder quadrangle. (b) Observaons of the two landslides studied in the Godt, J.W., Coe, J.A., Kean, J.W., Baum, R.L., Jones, E.S., Harp, E.L., Staley, D.M., and Barnhart, W.D., 2014, Landslides in the deposion areas. (a) Example of polygons created in the Boulder quadrangle. Eldorado Springs quadrangle. Northern Colorado Front Range caused by rainfall, September 11-13, 2013: U.S Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2013-2014. (b) Some of the polygons created in Eldorado Springs quadrangle !( !( !(.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Surficial Geologic Map of the Ahsahka Quadrangle, Clearwater County
    IDAHO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIGITAL WEB MAP 7 MOSCOW-BOISE-POCATELLO OTHBERG, WEISZ, AND BRECKENRIDGE SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE AHSAHKA QUADRANGLE, Disclaimer: This Digital Web Map is an informal report and may be revised and formally published at a later time. Its content and format CLEARWATER COUNTY, IDAHO may not conform to agency standards. Kurt L. Othberg, Daniel W. Weisz, and Roy M. Breckenridge 2002 embayments that now form the eastern edge of the Columbia River Plateau where the relatively flat region meets the mountains. Sediments of the Latah Qls Formation are interbedded with the basalt flows, and landslide deposits QTcr occur where major sedimentary interbeds are exposed along the valley sides. Qcg Pleistocene loess forms a thin discontinuous mantle on deeply weathered surfaces of the basalt plateau and mountain foothills. In the late Pleistocene, multiple Lake Missoula Floods inundated the Clearwater River valley, locally Qcb Qcb depositing silt, sand, and ice-rafted pebbles and cobbles in the lower elevations of the canyon. QTcr QTlsr The bedrock geology of this area is mapped by Lewis and others (2001) and shows details of the basement rocks and the Miocene basalt flows and Qcg sediments. The bedrock map’s cross sections are especially useful for QTlbr Qls interpreting subsurface conditions suitable for siting water wells and assessing Qls the extent and limits of ground water. Qac Qls QTlsr SURFICIAL DEPOSITS QTlbr QTlbr m Made ground (Holocene)—Large-scale artificial fills composed of excavated, transported, and emplaced construction materials of highly varying composition, but typically derived from local sources. Qam QTlsr Alluvium of mainstreams (Holocene)—Channel and flood-plain deposits of the Clearwater River that are actively being formed on a seasonal or annual Qls Qls basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Movement in Two Selected Areas of Western Washington County, Vania
    Mass Movement in Two Selected Areas of Western Washington County, vania GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1170-B MASS MOVEMENT IN TWO SELECTED AREAS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Recent earthflows along concave-convex east- to north-facing slopes west of Prosperity, Pa. Mass Movement in Two Selected Areas of Western Washington County, Pennsylvania By JOHN S. POMEROY SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1170-B Landsliding and its relation to geology and an analysis of various interpretive elements in a region of the Allegheny Plateau subject to landslides UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, W AS H INGTON : 1 982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Pomeroy, John S 1929- Mass movement in two selected areas of western Washington County, Pennsylvania. (Shorter contributions to general geology) (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1170-B) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1170-B 1. Mass-wasting-Pennsylvania-Washington Co. I. Title. II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Shorter contributions to general geology. III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1170-B. QE599.U5P65 551.3 80-607835 AACR1 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ______________________________ Bl Short Creek area __________________________ BIO Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geologic Map of the Dent Quadrangle, Clearwater County, Idaho
    IDAHO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIGITAL WEB MAP 6 MOSCOW-BOISE-POCATELLO OTHBERG, WEISZ, AND BRECKENRIDGE Disclaimer: This Digital Web Map is an informal report and may be revised and formally published at a later time. Its content and format may not conform to agency standards. SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE DENT QUADRANGLE, CLEARWATER COUNTY, IDAHO Kurt L. Othberg, Daniel W. Weisz, and Roy M. Breckenridge 2002 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS Qcg Qcg Qls INTRODUCTION Qls Qcb Qcb The surficial geologic map of the Dent quadrangle identifies earth materials Qcg on the surface and in the shallow subsurface. It is intended for those interested in the area's natural resources, urban and rural growth, and private and DWORSHAK public land development. The information relates to assessing diverse Qcb conditions and activities, such as slope stability, construction design, sewage drainage, solid waste disposal, and ground-water use and recharge. Qls The geology was intensively investigated during a one-year period. Natural ELE VAT and artificial exposures of the geology were examined and selectively 16 IO RESERVOIRQcg 00 N collected. In addition to field investigations, aerial photographs were studied Qls to aid in identifying boundaries between map units through photogeologic mapping of landforms. In most areas map-unit boundaries (contacts) are approximate and were drawn by outlining well-defined landforms. It is rare that contacts between two units can be seen in the field without excavation Qls Qcg operations which are beyond the purpose and scope of this map. The contacts are inferred where landforms are poorly defined and where lithologic Qcg characteristics grade from one map unit into another.
    [Show full text]
  • Colluvial Deposit
    Encyclopedia of Planetary Landforms DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-9213-9_55-1 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 Colluvial Deposit Susan W. S. Millar* Department of Geography, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA Synonyms Colluvial depositional system; Colluvial mantle; Colluvial soil; Colluvium; Debris slope; Hillslope (or hillside) deposits; Scree (UK); Slope mantle; Slope-waste deposits; Talus (US) Definition A sedimentary deposit composed of surface mantle that has accumulated toward the base of a slope as a result of transport by gravity and non-channelized flow. Description The International Geomorphological Association recognizes colluvium as a hillslope deposit resulting from two general nonexclusive processes (Goudie 2004). Rainwash, sheetwash, or creep can generate sediment accumulations at the base of gentle slopes; or non-channelized flow can initiate sheet erosion and toe-slope sediment accumulation. The term “colluvium” is frequently applied broadly to include mass wasting deposits in a variety of topographic and climatic settings. For example, Blikra and Nemec (1998) describe colluvium as any “clastic slope-waste material, typically coarse grained and immature, deposited in the lower part and foot zone of a mountain slope or other topographic escarpment, and brought there chiefly by sediment-gravity processes.” Lang and Honscheidt (1999) describe colluvium as “slope wash and tillage sediments, resulting from soil erosion....” The composition of a colluvial deposit can therefore be coarse-grained, eroded bedrock, with an open-work structure and several meters thick (Blikra and Nemec 1998), to fine-grained soil, ranging from a few millimeters to meters in thickness (e.g., Lang and Hönscheidt 1999). Some deposits may exhibit distinct macro- and micro-fabric development, bedding structures, and evi- dence of distinct periods of accumulation (e.g., Bertran et al.
    [Show full text]
  • This File Was Created by Scanning the Printed Publication
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Editors SHARON E. CLARKE is a geographer and GIS analyst, Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331; and SANDRA A. BRYCE is a biogeographer, Dynamac Corporation, Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR 97333. This document is a product of cooperative research between the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; the Forest Science De- partment, Oregon State University; and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cover Artwork Cover artwork was designed and produced by John Ivie. Abstract Clarke, Sharon E.; Bryce, Sandra A., eds. 1997. Hierarchical subdivisions of the Columbia Plateau and Blue Mountains ecoregions, Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-395. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 114 p. This document presents two spatial scales of a hierarchical, ecoregional framework and provides a connection to both larger and smaller scale ecological classifications. The two spatial scales are subregions (1:250,000) and landscape-level ecoregions (1:100,000), or Level IV and Level V ecoregions. Level IV ecoregions were developed by the Environmental Protection Agency because the resolution of national-scale ecoregions provided insufficient detail to meet the needs of state agencies for estab- lishing biocriteria, reference sites, and attainability goals for water-quality regulation. For this project, two ecoregions—the Columbia Plateau and the Blue Mountains— were subdivided into more detailed Level IV ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • NREM 301 Day 9
    NREM 301 Day 9 • Quiz on Thursday! • Continue discussing sequences (focusing on central IA) • Discuss Soil Taxonomy and major soil orders • Lab Today – “Identifying Soil Bio- and Toposequences” – Individual Assignment – due Thurs. Oct. 2. Soil Definition for Soil • A Natural Body • Unconsolidated Mixture • Mineral & Organic Matter • Living & Dead • Developing in Place Over Time Dirt So - soils vary dramatically spatially & temporally Because of: Soil = f(Cli, p, r, o, t) Cli = climate P = parent material R = relief O = organisms T = time High elevation – cold Soil = f(Cli, p, r, o, t) Cli = Climate What Soil Differences Would 5,000 ft – warm, humid You Expect? Why? Granite Glacial Till Soil = f(Cli, p, r, o, t) P = Parent Material What Soil Differences Would You Expect? Why? Soil Parent Materials – the raw mineral material soils are developing in. Rocks and Minerals Deposited in oceans -marine sediment Deposited in lakes ----lacustrine sediment Deposited in streams -alluvium – floodplain, delta terrace, fan ice Deposited by ice ----glacial till --- moraines transport Deposited by water --outwash – alluvium, marine lacustrine Deposited by wind - eolian --- loess, eolian sand, Residual sediment volcanic ash parent material (bedrock weathered Deposited by gravity –colluvium – creep, landslides in place) types of examples of deposits landforms or deposits Modified from Brady and Weil. 2002. The nature and properties of soils. 13th edition. Prentice Hall. N or E facing S or W facing Soil = f(Cli, p, r, o, t) r = Relief/Topography What Soil
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Movements General Anatomy
    CE/SC 10110-20110: Planet Earth Mass Movements Earth Portrait of a Planet Fifth Edition Chapter 16 Mass movement (or mass wasting) is the downslope motion of rock, regolith (soil, sediment, and debris), snow, and ice. General Anatomy Discrete slump blocks Head scarp Bulging toe Road for scale Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 Fractures rock, loosens soil particles. Seismic energy overstresses the system. Yungay, Peru, in the Santa River Valley beneath the heavily glaciated Nevado Huascarán (21,860 feet). May, 1970, earthquake occurred offshore ~100 km away - triggered many small rock falls. An 800-meter-wide block of ice was dislodged and avalanched downhill, scooping out small lakes and breaking off large masses of rock debris. Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 More than 50 million cubic meters of muddy debris traveled 3.7 km (12,000 feet) vertically and 14.5 km (9 miles) horizontally in less than 4 minutes! Main mass of material traveled down a steep valley, blocking the Santa River and burying ~18,000 people in Ranrachirca. A small part shot up the valley wall, was momentarily airborne before burying the village of Yungay. Estimated death toll = 17,000. Disaster in the Andes: Yungay, Peru, 1970 Before After Whats Left of Yungay. Common Mass Movements Rockfalls and Slides Slow Fast Debris Flows Slumping Lahars and Mudflows Solifluction and Creep These different kinds of mass movements are arranged from slowest (left) to fastest (right). Types of Mass Movement Different types of mass movement based on 4 factors: 1) Type of material involved (rock, regolith, snow, ice); 2) Velocity of the movement (slow, intermediate, fast); 3) Character of the movement (chaotic cloud, slurry, coherent mass; 4) Environment (subaerial, submarine).
    [Show full text]
  • Weathering, Erosion, and Mass-Wasting Processes
    Weathering, Erosion, and Mass-Wasting Processes Designed to meet South Carolina Department of Education 2005 Science Academic Standards 1 Table of Contents (1 of 2) Definitions: Weathering, Erosion, and Mass-Wasting (slide 4) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Types of Weathering (slide 5) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Mechanical Weathering (slide 6) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Exfoliation (slide 7) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Frost Wedging (slide 8) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Temperature Change (slide 9) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Salt Wedging (slide 10) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Abrasion (slide 11) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Chemical Weathering (slide 12) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Carbonation (slide 13) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Hydrolysis (slide 14) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Hydration (slide 15) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Oxidation (slide 16) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Solution (slide 17) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Biological Weathering (slide 18) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Lichen, Algae, and Decaying Plants (slide 19) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Plant Roots (slide 20) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Organism Activity: Burrowing, Tunneling, and Acid Secreting Organisms (slide 21) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Differential Weathering (slide 22) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) 2 Table of Contents, cont. (2 of 2) Types of Erosion (slide 23) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Fluvial (slide 24) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Aeolian (slide 25) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Ice: Glacial and Periglacial (slide 26) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Gravity (slide
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of the Ecoregions of Montana (Continued) Second Edition
    DRAFT 2 Summary Table: Characteristics of the Ecoregions of Montana (continued) Second Edition 41. CANADIAN ROCKIES 43. NORTHWESTERN GREAT PLAINS Level IV Ecoregion Physiography Geology Soil Climate Potential Natural Vegetation* Land Cover and Land Use Level IV Ecoregion Physiography Geology Soil Climate Potential Natural Vegetation* Land Cover and Land Use Area Elevation/ Surfi cial and Bedrock Order (Great Group) Common Soil Series Temperature/ Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature Area Elevation/ Surfi cial and Bedrock Order (Great Group) Common Soil Series Temperature/ Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature (square Local Relief Moisture Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; *Source: Ross, R.L., and Hunter, H.E., 1976 (square Local Relief Moisture Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; *Source: Kuchler, 1964 miles) (feet) Regimes (inches) (days) July min/max (oF) miles) (feet) Regimes (inches) (days) July min/max (oF) or Seasonality 41a. Northern Front 592 Glaciated. Forested mountains east of the 4500-7700/ Quaternary glacial drift, alluvium, and Alfi sols (Cryoboralfs), Loberg, Garlet, Evaro, Cryic/ 20-90 30-70 Long cold Subalpine fi r and Douglas-fi r Recreation is the major land use within 43a. Missouri Plateau 3425 Unglaciated (or not signifi cantly modifi ed by 2000-3550/ Quaternary terrace deposits. Primarily, Mollisols (Argiborolls, Chama, Morton, Bainville, Frigid/ 11-16 100-130 0/26; Wheatgrass–needlegrass. Mosaic of rangeland and farmland; Continental Divide are in the rainshadow of 400-2000 colluvium. Cretaceous undifferentiated Inceptisols (Cryochrepts), Mikesell, Whitore, Mord, Ustic, winters, moist forests. Glacier National Park; elsewhere, glaciation). Rolling hills and gravel-covered 50-500 Tongue River and Slope members of the Calciborolls, Flasher, Farnuf, Turner, Ustic 54/90 spring wheat, hay, barley, and oats are the Rocky Mountains and are underlain mostly sedimentary rock; also thrust-faulted, Mollisols (Cryoborolls) Helmville, Cowood, Cheadle, Udic springs logging, recreation, rural residential benches are extensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Forests and Ranges of the USDA Forest Service
    United States Department of Experimental Forests and Ranges Agriculture Forest Service of the USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station General Technical Report NE-321 Revised Abstract The USDA Forest Service has an outstanding scientific resource in the 79 Experimental Forests and Ranges that exist across the United States and its territories. These valuable scientific resources incorporate a broad range of climates, forest types, research emphases, and history. This publication describes each of the research sites within the Experimental Forests and Ranges network, providing information about history, climate, vegetation, soils, long-term data bases, research history and research products, as well as identifying collaborative opportunities, and providing contact information. The Compilers MARY BETH ADAMS, soil scientist, LINDA H. LOUGHRY, secretary, LINDA L. PLAUGHER, support services supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Timber and Watershed Laboratory, Parsons, West Virginia. Manuscript received for publication 17 November 2003 Published by: For additional copies: USDA FOREST SERVICE USDA Forest Service 11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200 Publications Distribution NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073-3294 359 Main Road September 2004 Delaware, OH 43015-8640 Revised March 2008 Fax: (740)368-0152 Revised publication available in CD-ROM only Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us Experimental Forests and Ranges of the USDA Forest Service Compiled by: Mary Beth Adams Linda Loughry Linda Plaugher Contents Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Debris Flows on Channels and Valley Floors in the Oregon Coast Range, U.S.A
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, VOL. 15, 457-466 (1990) THE INFLUENCE OF DEBRIS FLOWS ON CHANNELS AND VALLEY FLOORS IN THE OREGON COAST RANGE, U.S.A. LEE BENDA Department of Geological Sciences (AJ-20 ), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A. Received 24 August 1989 Revised 2 January 1990 ABSTRACT Debris flows are one of the most important processes which influence the morphology of channels and valley floors in the Oregon Coast Range. Debris flows that initiate in bedrock hollows at heads of first-order basins erode the long- accumulated sediment and organic debris from the floors of headwater, first- and second-order channels. This material is deposited on valley floors in the form of fans, levees, and terraces. In channels, deposits of debris flows control the distribution of boulders. The stochastic nature of sediment supply to alluvial channels by debris flows promotes cycling between channel aggradation which results in a gravel-bed morphology, and channel degradation which results in a mixed bedrock- and boulder-bed morphology. Temporal and spatial variability of channel-bed morphology is expected in other landscapes where debris flows are an important process. KEY WORDS Debris flows Mountain channels Channel aggradation INTRODUCTION Debris flows in the west coast of North America form as landslide debris liquifies and moves through steep, confined, headwater channels for distances up to several kilometres at speeds up to 10-15 m s t . The flows are extremely erosive and incorporate additional sediment from channels, as well as or ganic debris and water, and they deposit this material in lower-gradient channels and valley bottoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological-Geotechnical Properties of a Colluvial Soil in a Natural Slope Cut by a Pipeline
    ISSN: 1980-900X (online) GEOLOGICAL-GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF A COLLUVIAL SOIL IN A NATURAL SLOPE CUT BY A PIPELINE PROPRIEDADES GEOLÓGICO-GEOTÉCNICAS DE UM SOLO COLUVIONAR EM ENCOSTA NATURAL CORTADA POR UMA DUTOVIA Talita Gantus OLIVEIRA1, Alberto Pio FIORI1, Rodrigo Moraes da SILVEIRA2 1Universidade Federal do Paraná. Rua XV de Novembro, 1299 - Centro, Curitiba – PR. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 2Lactec – Instituto de Tecnologia para o Desenvolvimento. Avenida Comendador Franco, 1341. Jardim Botânico, Curitiba - PR E-mail: [email protected] Introduction Geological Aspects and Location of Study Area Methods Field Investigation Remote Sensing Soil Classification Determination of Geotechnical Properties Geomechanical Parameters Hydraulic Parameters Results and Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References ABSTRACT - The Serra do Mar, in the state of Paraná, Brazil, is marked by a relief with unstable areas, which is eventually subjected to mass movements along their slopes, primarily caused by the large amounts of rainfall that occur in such area. Within this scenario fits a pipeline conduit for the transportation of fuels, often bordering slopes in a situation of precarious balance. It is widely known that lithological, structural and geomorphic features play a major role in the slopes stability. Thus, it is important to understand the dynamics of these movements in order to preserve the physical integrity of the duct. Areas where the slope represents critical points of instability were selected for the study along the pipeline section. The main objective of this work is to investigate the geological and geotechnical features of the area cut by the pipeline in order to assess possible mass movements.
    [Show full text]