DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Evidence-Based Strategies for Preventing Opioid Overdose

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Evidence-Based Strategies for Preventing Opioid Overdose Evidence-Based Strategies for Preventing Opioid Overdose: What’s Working in the United States An introduction for public heath, law enforcement, local organizations, and others striving to serve their community Authors: Jennifer J. Carroll, PhD, MPH; Traci C. Green, PhD, MSc; and Rita K. Noonan, PhD 2018 Contents Introduction and Overview ....................................1 Guiding Principles ................................................3 Evidence-Based Strategies ....................................7 Targeted Naloxone Distribution ............................................8 Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) ..............................10 Academic Detailing ..........................................................12 Eliminating Prior-Authorization Requirements for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder ............................14 Screening for Fentanyl in Routine Clinical Toxicology Testing ..............................................................16 911 Good Samaritan Laws ...............................................18 Naloxone Distribution in Treatment Centers and Criminal Justice Settings ............................................20 MAT in Criminal Justice Settings and Upon Release ..........22 Initiating Buprenorphine-based MAT in Emergency Departments ...............................................24 Syringe Services Programs ................................................26 References .........................................................29 Acknowledgements This document and its contents were reviewed by numerous subject matter experts. The authors would especially like to thank the following persons: Alice Asher, Grant Baldwin, Dita Broz, Deborah Dowell, Brian Edlin, Tamara M. Haegerich, John Halpin, Joann Yoon Kang, Reshma Mahendra, Philip Peters, Jessica Wolff, and Nick Zaller. Suggested Citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Evidence-Based Strategies for Preventing Opioid Overdose: What’s Working in the United States. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018. Accessed [date] from http://www. cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/pubs/2018-evidence-based-strategies.pdf. Introduction and Overview Who is this document for? Based on these criteria, strategies identified can be considered promising or effective in reducing This document is to assist community leaders, opioid overdose. local and regional organizers, non-profit groups, law enforcement, public health, and members of the Over the course of several months, researchers, public in understanding and navigating effective public health professionals, and subject matter strategies to prevent opioid overdose in their experts were consulted to refine the list of strategies communities. considered into a collection of those interventions with the strongest evidence of efficacy AND with How can readers use this document? demonstrated feasibility in U.S. settings. These contributors, including physicians, epidemiologists, Readers can use this document as a general sociologists, medical anthropologists, harm reference for evidence-based practices that have reductionists, and more, offered individual input based been successfully implemented in the U.S. and are on their own research and experiences working at the effective in reducing rates of opioid overdose. This forefront of the opioid crisis. document also provides readers with straightforward This is not an exhaustive list of overdose prevention explanations of how and why these strategies work, strategies. Many countries—such as Canada, summaries of major research on these topics, Portugal, The Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, and examples of organizations from across the Norway, Australia, and Uruguay, just to name a few— U.S. that have excelled at putting these strategies have implemented overdose-prevention policies and into practice. programs that have never been used in the U.S. Even within the U.S., many local organizers and advocates How was this document created? have developed unique, locally appropriate strategies too numerous to name here. The selection of evidence-based strategies included in this document began with a systematic search In sum, the strategies laid out in this document are of scientific literature on the prevention of opioid well known, evidence-based actions that U.S. states overdose in the context of prescription opioid and municipalities can take today to prevent new misuse or use of illicit opioids. To be considered overdoses tomorrow. for inclusion in this document, strategies must have been successfully implemented in at least Why evidence-based? one jurisdiction in the U.S. as evidence for this document was being reviewed (between Opioid use disorders and opioid overdose are complex April and August 2017) AND meet one of the phenomena shaped by numerous social, biological, following evidentiary criteria: (1) meta-analyses and psychological factors. Due to this complexity— or systematic reviews have found the strategy to and the natural complexity of all human beings—fully be effective at reducing overdose and/or factors understanding and accounting for all of these factors that increase overdose risk; (2) evidence from a in an overdose prevention activity is a significant scientifically rigorous experimental study, such challenge. Often, ideas that once looked promising fail as a randomized controlled trial, demonstrates to pan out as expected.* There are also strategies the strategy’s effectiveness in reducing overdose that at first glance appeared counter-intuitive or and/or factors that increase overdose risk; or (3) wrong but were ultimately shown to be very effective multiple observational studies from U.S. settings in preventing fatal overdose. Subjecting overdose indicate the strategy’s ability to reduce overdose or prevention interventions to scientific testing and mitigate and reduce factors that increase overdose evaluation is the only way to know for sure whether risk. In order to provide the broadest possible these intuitions are correct. scope of evidence for guiding the implementation of In acknowledgement of this pressing need, a overdose prevention strategies in the U.S., research practice is considered both “locally appropriate” that has been conducted in international settings and “evidence-based” if it has been designed in that examines strategies also well-studied and accordance with three key sources of information: proven feasible in U.S. settings are included in this (1) high quality scientific research; (2) the document as well. professional opinions and experiences of clinical Evidence-Based Strategies for Preventing Opioid Overdose: What’s Working in the United States, 2018 1 and public health experts; and (3) the preferences, priorities, and values of the individuals who will be targeted or affected by that practice.1 By offering this summary of the current “best practices” for overdose prevention, based on a thorough review of existing research and expertise from a diverse array of medical and public health professionals, this document aims to fulfill areas 1 (scientific research) and 2 (expert opinions). Area 3, the preferences and priorities of those affected (in this case, individuals who use opioids or are otherwise at risk of opioid overdose), must be sought anew in each new community context. This combination of evidence, expertise, and community dialog will lay the groundwork for truly effective opioid overdose prevention strategies across the U.S. * Research shows that some opioid use and overdose prevention interventions have harmful effects on individuals at risk. Some have even been shown to increase the risks of opioid overdose. The causes of these harms often include the sharp reduction of opioid tolerance during periods of high risk for relapse; the inadvertent promotion of riskier drug use practices through inattention to structural risk factors; and the exposure of at-risk individuals to additional trauma. Examples of strategies shown ineffective by research and data include: arrest and incarceration, compulsory treatment, rapid detox without opioid agonist/antagonist medication assistance, inappropriately implemented school-based education (e.g. short sessions focused on knowledge improvement and resistance only, mixing students from different risk groups), and inappropriately implemented drug court systems (e.g. low quality service provision, improper participant selection, lack of program evaluation). 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Guiding Principles Below are four overarching principles, lessons gleaned from previous public health emergencies, such as the HIV/AIDS crisis in the 1980s and 1990s. These principles serve as a guide for the design and implementation of effective overdose prevention strategies. 1. Know your epidemic, know your response those players take on those roles in deliberate coordination with each other. Accomplishing First advanced by UNAIDS as a guiding principle this requires much more than sharing data and for global HIV prevention and control, the mantra intelligence. The implementation of a proven public “know your epidemic, know your response” health approach such as a 911 Good Samaritan originally spoke to the mismatch between strategy Law may be ineffective if law enforcement officers and reality that hindered HIV control efforts in are not included in the planning and design of its the first years of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report
    Research Report Revised Junio 2018 Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Table of Contents Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Overview How do medications to treat opioid use disorder work? How effective are medications to treat opioid use disorder? What are misconceptions about maintenance treatment? What is the treatment need versus the diversion risk for opioid use disorder treatment? What is the impact of medication for opioid use disorder treatment on HIV/HCV outcomes? How is opioid use disorder treated in the criminal justice system? Is medication to treat opioid use disorder available in the military? What treatment is available for pregnant mothers and their babies? How much does opioid treatment cost? Is naloxone accessible? References Page 1 Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Discusses effective medications used to treat opioid use disorders: methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Overview An estimated 1.4 million people in the United States had a substance use disorder related to prescription opioids in 2019.1 However, only a fraction of people with prescription opioid use disorders receive tailored treatment (22 percent in 2019).1 Overdose deaths involving prescription opioids more than quadrupled from 1999 through 2016 followed by significant declines reported in both 2018 and 2019.2,3 Besides overdose, consequences of the opioid crisis include a rising incidence of infants born dependent on opioids because their mothers used these substances during pregnancy4,5 and increased spread of infectious diseases, including HIV and hepatitis C (HCV), as was seen in 2015 in southern Indiana.6 Effective prevention and treatment strategies exist for opioid misuse and use disorder but are highly underutilized across the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Overdose – Use of Naloxone
    CHAPTER: 41.3.1 Page 1 of 4 NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS MANUAL CHAPTER: 41.3.1 TITLE: OPIOID OVERDOSE – USE OF NALOXONE EFFECTIVE: 10/22/2017 REVISED: 06/24/2018 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to set forth guidelines with respect to the appropriate field administration of Naloxone (Narcan) kits by members of New Orleans Police Department in suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents. POLICY STATEMENT 1. Commissioned members of the NOPD are often the first emergency responders to the scene of a medical, suspected medical and overdose incident. Recognizing this, the NOPD has adopted this Chapter with the following goals: (a) To provide a framework for training in the field use of Naloxone, (b) To provide a framework on the proper field administration of Naloxone, and (c) To facilitate life-saving intervention in suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents where NOPD officers are the first to arrive on the scene. 2. All commissioned and/or civilian members who have been trained in the use and administration of the department’s Naloxone nasal administration kits for suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents are authorized to carry, use and administer the kits. 3. All members responding to medical calls, including suspected opioid overdoses, shall use universal precautions. DEFINITIONS: Definitions related to this Chapter include: Administration—Nasal administration of approved Naloxone 2mg kits with atomizer; 1mg (1/2 dose) to be administered in each nostril. Naloxone—A narcotic analgesic antagonist, used in the reversal of acute narcotic analgesic respiratory depression. Naloxone is effectively an antidote to opioid overdose and may completely reverse the effects of an opioid overdose if administered in time.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Title Page Pharmacological Comparison of Mitragynine and 7
    JPET Fast Forward. Published on December 31, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.000189 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. JPET-AR-2020-000189R1: Obeng et al. Pharmacological Comparison of Mitragynine and 7-Hydroxymitragynine: In Vitro Affinity and Efficacy for Mu-Opioid Receptor and Morphine-Like Discriminative-Stimulus Effects in Rats. Title Page Pharmacological Comparison of Mitragynine and 7-Hydroxymitragynine: In Vitro Affinity and Efficacy for Mu-Opioid Receptor and Opioid-Like Behavioral Effects in Rats Samuel Obeng1,2,#, Jenny L. Wilkerson1,#, Francisco León2, Morgan E. Reeves1, Luis F. Restrepo1, Lea R. Gamez-Jimenez1, Avi Patel1, Anna E. Pennington1, Victoria A. Taylor1, Nicholas P. Ho1, Tobias Braun1, John D. Fortner2, Morgan L. Crowley2, Morgan R. Williamson1, Victoria L.C. Pallares1, Marco Mottinelli2, Carolina Lopera-Londoño2, Christopher R. McCurdy2, Lance R. McMahon1, and Takato Hiranita1* Downloaded from Departments of Pharmacodynamics1 and Medicinal Chemistry2, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida jpet.aspetjournals.org #These authors contributed equally Recommended section: Behavioral Pharmacology at ASPET Journals on September 29, 2021 Correspondence: *Takato Hiranita, Ph.D. Department of Pharmacodynamics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida 1345 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610 Email: [email protected] Phone: +1.352.294.5411 Fax: +1.352.273.7705 Keywords: kratom, mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine, morphine, opioid, discriminative stimulus Conflicts of Interests or Disclaimers: None Manuscript statistics: Number of text pages: 56 Number of tables: 7 Number of figures: 10 Number of supplementary Tables: 4 Number of supplementary figures: 7 1 JPET Fast Forward. Published on December 31, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.000189 This article has not been copyedited and formatted.
    [Show full text]
  • Naloxone FAQ What Is Naloxone?
    1 Naloxone FAQ What is naloxone? An FDA approved opioid antagonist prescription medication that reverses opioid overdoses. Two of the most common ways that naloxone is administered are intranasally (nasal spray) and the auto-injector. Naloxone is available under the names of” naloxone,” an injectable that, with attachments can also be used as a nasal spray; “NARCAN,” an already assembled and easy to administer nasal spray; and, finally “EVZO,” a prefilled auto-injector. How does it work? It stops or reverses the effects of an opioid overdose and restores breathing within two (2) to eight (8) minutes. The naloxone effect lasts from 20 to 90 minutes, and can be safely readministered as indicated. Is it safe? Yes. It cannot be used to get high and it is non-addictive . Where do I find an approved training? Free in-person NARCAN administration training is available at Prevention Point Philadelphia. Where do I find an approved online training and how long does training take? www.getnaloxonenow.org https://www.pavtn.net/act-139-training http://prescribetoprevent.org/patient-education/videos/ Training takes approximately 20 minutes. Does Act 139 under Provision of Good Samaritan cover provider agencies? Yes. How do we obtain naloxone? Providers will have to purchase by prescription. Individuals may do so by prescription or by standing order issued by Pennsylvania’s Physician General, Dr. Rachel Levine. Some pharmacies keep this standing order on file. NALOXONE/NARCAN FAQ Page 1 2 Naloxone FAQ (continued) Does Medical Assistance require prior authorization for any of the naloxone products? The Evzio Auto-Injector is covered by Medical Assistance, but requires prior authorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Receptorsreceptors
    OPIOIDOPIOID RECEPTORSRECEPTORS defined or “classical” types of opioid receptor µ,dk and . Alistair Corbett, Sandy McKnight and Graeme Genes encoding for these receptors have been cloned.5, Henderson 6,7,8 More recently, cDNA encoding an “orphan” receptor Dr Alistair Corbett is Lecturer in the School of was identified which has a high degree of homology to Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow the “classical” opioid receptors; on structural grounds Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, this receptor is an opioid receptor and has been named Glasgow G4 0BA, UK. ORL (opioid receptor-like).9 As would be predicted from 1 Dr Sandy McKnight is Associate Director, Parke- their known abilities to couple through pertussis toxin- Davis Neuroscience Research Centre, sensitive G-proteins, all of the cloned opioid receptors Cambridge University Forvie Site, Robinson possess the same general structure of an extracellular Way, Cambridge CB2 2QB, UK. N-terminal region, seven transmembrane domains and Professor Graeme Henderson is Professor of intracellular C-terminal tail structure. There is Pharmacology and Head of Department, pharmacological evidence for subtypes of each Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical receptor and other types of novel, less well- Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, characterised opioid receptors,eliz , , , , have also been Bristol BS8 1TD, UK. postulated. Thes -receptor, however, is no longer regarded as an opioid receptor. Introduction Receptor Subtypes Preparations of the opium poppy papaver somniferum m-Receptor subtypes have been used for many hundreds of years to relieve The MOR-1 gene, encoding for one form of them - pain. In 1803, Sertürner isolated a crystalline sample of receptor, shows approximately 50-70% homology to the main constituent alkaloid, morphine, which was later shown to be almost entirely responsible for the the genes encoding for thedk -(DOR-1), -(KOR-1) and orphan (ORL ) receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update
    The ASAM NATIONAL The ASAM National Practice Guideline 2020 Focused Update Guideline 2020 Focused National Practice The ASAM PRACTICE GUIDELINE For the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder 2020 Focused Update Adopted by the ASAM Board of Directors December 18, 2019. © Copyright 2020. American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for commercial, advertising or promotional purposes, and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the fi rst page. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, redistribution to lists, or other uses of this material, require prior specifi c written permission or license from the Society. American Society of Addiction Medicine 11400 Rockville Pike, Suite 200 Rockville, MD 20852 Phone: (301) 656-3920 Fax (301) 656-3815 E-mail: [email protected] www.asam.org CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE The ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update 2020 Focused Update Guideline Committee members Kyle Kampman, MD, Chair (alpha order): Daniel Langleben, MD Chinazo Cunningham, MD, MS, FASAM Ben Nordstrom, MD, PhD Mark J. Edlund, MD, PhD David Oslin, MD Marc Fishman, MD, DFASAM George Woody, MD Adam J. Gordon, MD, MPH, FACP, DFASAM Tricia Wright, MD, MS Hendre´e E. Jones, PhD Stephen Wyatt, DO Kyle M. Kampman, MD, FASAM, Chair 2015 ASAM Quality Improvement Council (alpha order): Daniel Langleben, MD John Femino, MD, FASAM Marjorie Meyer, MD Margaret Jarvis, MD, FASAM, Chair Sandra Springer, MD, FASAM Margaret Kotz, DO, FASAM George Woody, MD Sandrine Pirard, MD, MPH, PhD Tricia E.
    [Show full text]
  • SAMHSA Opioid Overdose Prevention TOOLKIT
    SAMHSA Opioid Overdose Prevention TOOLKIT Opioid Use Disorder Facts Five Essential Steps for First Responders Information for Prescribers Safety Advice for Patients & Family Members Recovering From Opioid Overdose TABLE OF CONTENTS SAMHSA Opioid Overdose Prevention Toolkit Opioid Use Disorder Facts.................................................................................................................. 1 Scope of the Problem....................................................................................................................... 1 Strategies to Prevent Overdose Deaths.......................................................................................... 2 Resources for Communities............................................................................................................. 4 Five Essential Steps for First Responders ........................................................................................ 5 Step 1: Evaluate for Signs of Opioid Overdose ................................................................................ 5 Step 2: Call 911 for Help .................................................................................................................. 5 Step 3: Administer Naloxone ............................................................................................................ 6 Step 4: Support the Person’s Breathing ........................................................................................... 7 Step 5: Monitor the Person’s Response ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Are Opioid Antagonists Effective in Attenuating the Core Symptoms of Autism Spectrum Conditions in Children: a Systematic Review
    bs_bs_banner Journal of Intellectual Disability Research doi: 10.1111/jir.12122 293 volume 59 part 4 pp 293–306 april 2015 Are opioid antagonists effective in attenuating the core symptoms of autism spectrum conditions in children: a systematic review A. Roy,1 M. Roy,2 S. Deb,3† G. Unwin3 &A.Roy4 1 Manchester Medical School, Manchester, UK 2 Birmingham Community Healthcare Trust, Birmingham, UK 3 Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK 4 Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust, Birmingham, UK Abstract the available evidence and a systematic review was undertaken. Background ASC (autism spectrum conditions) Methods Four electronic databases were searched may result from a failure of striatal beta endorphins for relevant journal articles. In addition, cross- to diminish with maturation. Many symptoms of referencing of pertinent reviews and a hand search ASC resemble behaviours induced in animals or for articles in major international intellectual dis- humans by opiate administration, including ability (ID) journals between the years 2010 and decreased socialisation, diminished crying, repetitive 2012 was carried out to ensure that all relevant arti- stereotypies, insensitivity to pain and motor hyper- cles were identified. We also searched databases for activity. Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, has been unpublished clinical trials to overcome publication used in the management of children with ASC and bias. Each database was searched up to present can produce a clinically significant reduction in the (February 2013) with no restrictions on the date of serious and life-threatening behaviour of self-injury publication. The search terms consisted of broad for individuals who have not been responsive to any expressions used to describe ID and autistic spec- other type of treatment and is important for this trum disorder as well as terms relating to opioid reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Revex (Nalmefene Hydrochloride Injection) Rx Only DESCRIPTION REVEX (Nalmefene Hydrochloride Injection), an Opioid Antagonist, Is a 6-Methylene Analogue of Naltrexone
    Revex (nalmefene hydrochloride injection) Rx only DESCRIPTION REVEX (nalmefene hydrochloride injection), an opioid antagonist, is a 6-methylene analogue of naltrexone. The chemical structure is shown below: Molecular Formula: C21H25NO3•HCl Molecular Weight: 375.9, CAS # 58895-64-0 Chemical Name: 17-(Cyclopropylmethyl)-4,5〈-epoxy-6-methylenemorphinan-3,14-diol, hydrochloride salt. Nalmefene hydrochloride is a white to off-white crystalline powder which is freely soluble in water up to 130 mg/mL and slightly soluble in chloroform up to 0.13 mg/mL, with a pKa of 7.6. REVEX is available as a sterile solution for intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous administration in two concentrations, containing 100 µg or 1.0 mg of nalmefene free base per mL. The 100 µg/mL concentration contains 110.8 µg of nalmefene hydrochloride and the 1.0 mg/mL concentration contains 1.108 mg of nalmefene hydrochloride per mL. Both concentrations contain 9.0 mg of sodium chloride per mL and the pH is adjusted to 3.9 with hydrochloric acid. Concentrations and dosages of REVEX are expressed as the free base equivalent of nalmefene. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Pharmacodynamics REVEX prevents or reverses the effects of opioids, including respiratory depression, sedation, and hypotension. Pharmacodynamic studies have shown that REVEX has a longer duration of action than naloxone at fully reversing doses. REVEX has no opioid agonist activity. REVEX is not known to produce respiratory depression, psychotomimetic effects, or pupillary constriction. No pharmacological activity was observed when REVEX was administered in the absence of opioid agonists. REVEX has not been shown to produce tolerance, physical dependence, or abuse potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Overdose: Preventing and ­Reducing Opioid Overdose Mortality
    Opioid overdose: preventing and reducing opioid overdose mortality DISCUSSION PAPER UNODC/WHO 2013 Opioid overdose: preventing and reducing opioid overdose mortality UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Discussion paper UNODC/WHO 2013 Opioid overdose: preventing and reducing opioid overdose mortality Contribution of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and the World Health Organization to improving responses by Member States to the increasing problem of opioid overdose deaths UNITED NATIONS New York, 2013 © United Nations, June 2013. All rights reserved, worldwide. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Acknowledgements This draft discussion paper has been prepared by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Drug Prevention and Health Branch and the World Health Organization (WHO) Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Management of Substance Abuse Team, in the context of the UNODC/WHO Pro- gramme on Drug Dependence Treatment and Care, pursuant to Commission on Narcotic Drugs resolution 55/7, in which the Commission requested UNODC, in collaboration with WHO, to disseminate best practices on the prevention
    [Show full text]
  • Ultra-Low-Dose Opioid Antagonists to Enhance Opioid Analgesia Paul Sloan, MD Scott Hamann, Phd, MD
    literature review Ultra-low-dose opioid antagonists to enhance opioid analgesia Paul Sloan, MD Scott Hamann, PhD, MD abstract response to a given opioid, 5 which may be due in part to individual differences in terms of the balance of analgesic This article will review decades of science contributing to versus hyperalgesic actions of opioids. current interest in opioid excitatory pharmacology. A long In order to improve opioid analgesia in patients with history of clinical confusion provided the stimulus for chronic moderate to severe pain, clinicians use several recent, detailed in vivo and in vitro investigations of the strategies: 1) combining therapy with other analgesics neuropharmacologic mechanisms involved in analgesic such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories or NMDA recep - and hyperalgesic actions of opioid agonists and antago - tor antagonists; 2) adding adjuvant analgesic agents such nists. Following the discovery of central nervous system opi - as tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, oral local oid excitatory-hyperalgesic processes in animals, detailed anesthetics, or muscle relaxants; 3) rotating to a different neuronal cell culture experiments established opioid recep - opioid; 4) changing the route of opioid administration tor/G protein/adenylate cyclase neurobiochemical mecha - (for example, from oral to intravenous or spinal); 5) using nisms for bimodal inhibitory versus excitatory actions of surgical or anesthetic interventional techniques; or 6) opioids. Once this novel model was available to explain the adding nonpharmacological pain therapies such as phys - cellular mechanisms responsible for the duality of opioid ical therapy, massage therapy, biofeedback, and actions, clinical translation of this technology began to acupuncture. 3 All of the above strategies have their limi - emerge, with a primary focus on selective antagonism of tations, side effects, and contraindications 6-9 ; thus, future opioid excitatory actions with concomitant low-dose opioid pain management practice requires development and antagonists.
    [Show full text]
  • TARGINIQ ER Safely and Effectively
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION mg oral oxymorphone per day, 60 mg oral hydrocodone per day, or an These highlights do not include all the information needed to use equianalgesic dose of another opioid. (2.1) TM TARGINIQ ER safely and effectively. See full prescribing information • Use the lowest effective dosage for the shortest duration consistent with for TARGINIQ ER. individual patient treatment goals. (2.1) • Individualize dosing based on the severity of pain, patient response, prior TARGINIQ ER (oxycodone hydrochloride and naloxone hydrochloride analgesic experience, and risk factors for addiction, abuse, and misuse. extended-release tablets), for oral use, CII (2.1) Initial U.S. Approval: 2014 • Instruct patients to swallow tablets intact and not to cut, break, chew, crush, or dissolve tablets (risk of potentially fatal overdose). (2.1, 5.1) WARNING: ADDICTION, ABUSE, AND MISUSE; LIFE­ • For opioid-naïve and opioid non-tolerant patients, initiate with 10 mg/5 mg THREATENING RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION; ACCIDENTAL tablets orally every 12 hours. (2.1) INGESTION; NEONATAL OPIOID WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME; • Mild Hepatic Impairment: Reduce the starting dose of TARGINIQ ER to CYTOCHROME P450 3A4 INTERACTION; and RISKS FROM 1/3 to 1/2 the usual starting dose in patients with mild hepatic impairment. CONCOMITANT USE WITH BENZODIAZEPINES AND OTHER (8.7) CNS DEPRESSANTS • Renal Impairment: Reduce the initial dose to 1/2 the usual dose when See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. administering TARGINIQ ER to patients with renal impairment. (8.8) • TARGINIQ ER exposes users to risks of addiction, abuse and misuse, • Do not abruptly discontinue TARGINIQ ER in a physically dependent which can lead to overdose and death.
    [Show full text]