ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update The ASAM NATIONAL The ASAM National Practice Guideline 2020 Focused Update Guideline 2020 Focused National Practice The ASAM PRACTICE GUIDELINE For the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder 2020 Focused Update Adopted by the ASAM Board of Directors December 18, 2019. © Copyright 2020. American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for commercial, advertising or promotional purposes, and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the fi rst page. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, redistribution to lists, or other uses of this material, require prior specifi c written permission or license from the Society. American Society of Addiction Medicine 11400 Rockville Pike, Suite 200 Rockville, MD 20852 Phone: (301) 656-3920 Fax (301) 656-3815 E-mail: [email protected] www.asam.org CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE The ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update 2020 Focused Update Guideline Committee members Kyle Kampman, MD, Chair (alpha order): Daniel Langleben, MD Chinazo Cunningham, MD, MS, FASAM Ben Nordstrom, MD, PhD Mark J. Edlund, MD, PhD David Oslin, MD Marc Fishman, MD, DFASAM George Woody, MD Adam J. Gordon, MD, MPH, FACP, DFASAM Tricia Wright, MD, MS Hendre´e E. Jones, PhD Stephen Wyatt, DO Kyle M. Kampman, MD, FASAM, Chair 2015 ASAM Quality Improvement Council (alpha order): Daniel Langleben, MD John Femino, MD, FASAM Marjorie Meyer, MD Margaret Jarvis, MD, FASAM, Chair Sandra Springer, MD, FASAM Margaret Kotz, DO, FASAM George Woody, MD Sandrine Pirard, MD, MPH, PhD Tricia E. Wright, MD, MS, FACOG, DFASAM Robert J. Roose, MD, MPH Stephen Wyatt, DO, FAOAAM, FASAM, Co-Chair Alexis Geier-Horan, ASAM Staff 2019 Focused Update ASAM Quality Improvement Coun- Beth Haynes, ASAM Staff cil (alpha order): Penny S. Mills, MBA, ASAM, Executive Vice-President John Femino, MD, DFASAM Special External Reviewer: Kenneth Freedman, MD, MS, MBA, DFASAM, FACP, Michael M. Miller, MD, FASAM, FAPA AGAF Chair 2015 Treatment Research Institute Technical Team Mem- R. Jeffrey Goldsmith, MD, DLFAPA, DFASAM bers (alpha order): Barbara Herbert, MD, DFASAM Amanda Abraham, PhD Margaret Jarvis, MD, DFASAM Karen Dugosh, PhD Margaret Kotz, DO, DFASAM David Festinger, PhD P. Stephen Novack, DO, MHCDS Kyle Kampman, MD, Principal Investigator David R. Pating, MD, FASAM Keli McLoyd, JD Sandrine Pirard, MD, PhD, MPH, FAPA, FASAM Brittany Seymour, BA Maureen Boyle, PhD, ASAM Staff Abigail Woodworth, MS Taleen Safarian, ASAM Staff Disclosure information for the 2015 Guideline Com- Leah White, ASAM Staff mittee members, the ASAM Quality Improvement Council, 2019 Focused Update Research Triangle Institute Interna- and external reviewers is available respectively in Appendices tional (RTI) Team Members (alpha order): IV, V, and VI Karen Crotty, PhD, MPH, Principal Investigator ASAM is honored that this clinical practice guideline Mark Edlund, MD, PhD has been endorsed by: Janice Tzeng, MPH Meera Viswanathan, PhD American Academy of Physician Assistants Brittany Zulkiewicz, BS American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Disclosure information for the 2019 focused update American College of Nurse-Midwives Guideline Committee members and the ASAM Quality American College of Preventive Medicine Improvement Council is available, respectively, in Appendi- American Osteopathic Academy of Addiction Medicine ces VII and VIII. Federation of State Physician Health Programs International Nurses Society on Addictions 2015 Guideline Committee Members (alpha order): National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers Sandra Comer, PhD Table of Contents Chinazo Cunningham, MD, MS Marc J. Fishman, MD, FASAM Abbreviations and Acronyms 3 Adam Gordon, MD, MPH, FASAM National Practice Guideline Glossary 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Purpose 7 Received for publication January 8, 2020; accepted January 13, 2020. Background Updated 7 Copyright ß 2020 American Society of Addiction Medicine Scope of Guideline 8 ISSN: 1932-0620/20/1402S-0001 Intended Audience 8 DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000633 Qualifying Statement 8 Adopted by the ASAM Board of Directors December 18, 2019 1 White et el. Adopted by the ASAM Board of Directors December 18, 2019 Overview of Methodology 8 Transitioning Between Treatment Medications 47 2019 Focused Update New 8 Summary of Recommendations – Naltrexone 47 Summary of Recommendations 10 PART 7: PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT IN CONJUNCTION 47 INTRODUCTION 17 WITH MEDICATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID Purpose 17 USE DISORDER Background on Opioid Use Disorder 17 Background 47 Epidemiology 17 Goals of Psychosocial Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder 48 Mortality and Morbidity 17 Components of Psychosocial Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder 48 Scope of Guideline 18 Efficacy of Psychosocial Treatments in Opioid Use Disorder 48 Included and Excluded Medications 18 Peer Support and Mutual-Help Programs 48 Intended Audience 18 Adherence to Psychosocial Treatment Within Overall Treatment 49 Qualifying Statement 18 Psychosocial Treatment and Treatment with Methadone, 49 METHODOLOGY 19 Buprenorphine, or Naltrexone Overview of Approach 19 Summary of Recommendations – Psychosocial Treatment in 49 2015 Guideline Development 19 Conjunction With Medications for the Treatment of Opioid Use 2019 Focused Update New 21 Disorder PART 1: ASSESSMENT AND DIAGNOSIS OF OPIOID USE 22 PART 8: SPECIAL POPULATIONS: PREGNANT WOMEN 49 DISORDER Background 49 Comprehensive Assessment 22 Assessment of Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnant Women 50 Medical History 22 Medical Examination 50 Physical Examination 23 Opioid Agonist Treatment in Pregnancy 51 Assessment and History Considerations Specific to Females 23 Naltrexone in Pregnancy 51 Laboratory Tests 23 Naloxone in Pregnancy 51 Assessment for Mental Health Status and Psychiatric Disorder 23 Methadone Initiation 51 Assessment for Substance Use and Treatment History 24 Buprenorphine Initiation 52 Assessment for Co-occurring Substance Use 24 Dosing of Opioid Agonists During Pregnancy 52 Assessment for Nicotine Use 24 Postpartum Treatment 52 Assessment of Psychosocial and Environmental Factors 25 Breastfeeding 53 Diagnosing Opioid Use Disorder 25 Summary of Recommendations – Special Populations: Pregnant 53 DSM-5 Criteria for Diagnosis 25 Women Summary of Recommendations 26 PART 9: SPECIAL POPULATIONS: INDIVIDUALS WITH PAIN 54 PART 2: TREATMENT OPTIONS 27 Background 54 Introduction 27 General Considerations for All Patients With Pain 54 Pharmacotherapy Options 27 Pain Management in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder 54 Opioid Dosing Considerations: Opioid Use Disorder Versus Chronic 28 Buprenorphine and Pain Management 55 Pain Naltrexone and Pain Management 55 Efficacy Considerations 28 Considerations for Surgery 55 Medication Management 31 Summary of Recommendations – Special Populations: Individuals 56 Length of Treatment 32 With Pain PART 3: TREATING OPIOID WITHDRAWAL 33 PART 10: SPECIAL POPULATIONS: ADOLESCENTS 57 Background 33 Background 57 Assessment of Patients for Opioid Withdrawal 33 Confidentiality in Treatment 57 Medications in Opioid Withdrawal 34 Pharmacotherapy Options for Adolescents 57 Summary of Recommendations – Treating Opioid Withdrawal 35 Opioid Agonists: Methadone and Buprenorphine 57 PART 4: METHADONE 36 Efficacy Research on Agonists and Partial Agonists in Adolescents 57 Background 36 Opioid Antagonist: Naltrexone 57 PATIENT SELECTION AND TREATMENT GOALS 36 Psychosocial Treatment for Adolescents 57 COURSE OF TREATMENT 36 Summary of Recommendations – Special Populations: Adolescents 58 TRANSITIONING BETWEEN TREATMENT MEDICATIONS 38 PART 11: SPECIAL POPULATIONS: INDIVIDUALS WITH CO- 58 Summary of Recommendations – Methadone 39 OCCURRING PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS PART 5: BUPRENORPHINE 39 Background 58 Background 39 Assessment of Psychiatric Co-occurrence 58 Formulations of Buprenorphine 40 Co-occurring Psychiatric Disorders and Suicide Risk 59 Patient Selection and Treatment Goals 40 Considerations with Specific Psychiatric Disorders 59 Precautions 40 Co-occurring Psychiatric Disorders and Agonist Treatment 59 Dosing 42 Co-occurring Psychiatric Disorders and Antagonist Treatment 59 Length of Treatment 43 Summary of Recommendations – Special Populations: Individuals 59 Transitioning Between Treatment Medications 43 With Co-occurring Psychiatric Disorders Summary of Recommendations – Buprenorphine 44 PART 12: SPECIAL POPULATIONS: INDIVIDUALS IN THE 60 PART 6: NALTREXONE 44 CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Background 44 Background 60 Formulations of Naltrexone: Oral Versus Extended-Release 45 Effectiveness of Pharmacotherapy 60 Injectable Treatment Options 61 Patient Selection and Treatment Goals 45 Summary of Recommendations – Special Populations: Individuals 62 Oral Naltrexone 45 in the Criminal Justice System Extended-Release Injectable Naltrexone 45 PART 13: NALOXONE FOR THE prevention OF OPIOID 62 Precautions 45 OVERDOSE DEATH Risk of Relapse and Subsequent Opioid Overdose 45 Introduction 62 Course of Treatment 45 Patients and Significant Others/Family Members 63 Initiation 45 Individuals Trained and Authorized to Use Naloxone 63 Dosing 46 Safety and Efficacy of Bystander Administered Naloxone 63 Adverse Effects 46 Routes of Administration 63 2 ß 2020 American Society of Addiction Medicine Adopted by the ASAM Board of Directors December 18, 2019 NPG for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
Recommended publications
  • PCSS Guidance: Transfer from Methadone to Buprenorphine
    PCSS Guidance Topic: Transfer from Methadone to Buprenorphine Original Author: Paul P. Casadonte, M.D. Last Updated: 12/5/13 (Maria A. Sullivan, M.D., Ph.D.) Guideline Coverage: TIP #40, Treatment Protocols: Patients dependent on long-acting opioids (pgs. 52-54) Clinical Questions: 1. Which patients receiving methadone should be considered good candidates for transfer to buprenorphine? 2. How should I transition a patient from methadone to buprenorphine? Background: Patients receiving methadone may seek transfer to buprenorphine treatment. There are a large number of clinical scenarios that would cause a patient receiving methadone to seek induction onto buprenorphine. It is incumbent upon the physician to weigh the clinical issues carefully prior to agreeing to assist in the transfer. If a patient is stable on methadone, it is generally not advisable to agree to transfer to buprenorphine without a careful evaluation of the factors motivating the desire to transfer. However, if in the physician's medical judgment, buprenorphine treatment is appropriate and the patient is well-informed of the risks and benefits, transfer may be a reasonable option. Among the potential benefits of transfer to buprenorphine include lower risk of overdose or sedation, lower risk of QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias, less severe withdrawal if a dose is missed, the capacity to obtain medication at a local pharmacy and the option of treatment in a doctor's office. A number of factors might motivate a patient's request to transfer from methadone. These
    [Show full text]
  • Background to the Celebration of Herbert D. Kleber (1904 -2018) by Thomas A
    1 Background to the Celebration of Herbert D. Kleber (1904 -2018) by Thomas A. Ban By the mid-1990s the pioneering generation in neuropsychopharmacology was fading away. To preserve their legacy the late Oakley Ray (1931-2007), at the time Secretary of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ACNP), generated funds from Solway Pharmaceuticals for the founding of the ACNP-Solway Archives in Neuropsychopharmacology. Ray also arranged for the videotaping of interviews (mainly by their peers) with the pioneers, mostly at annual meetings, to be stored in the archives. Herbert Kleber was interviewed by Andrea Tone, a medical historian at the Annual Meeting of the College held in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on December 7, 2003 (Ban 2011a; Kleber 2011a). The endeavor that was to become known as the “oral history project” is based on 235 videotaped interviews conducted by 66 interviewers with 213 interviewees which, on the basis of their content, were divided and edited into a 10-volume series produced by Thomas A. Ban, in collaboration with nine colleagues who were to become volume editors. One of them, Herbert Kleber, was responsible for the editing of Volume Six, dedicated to Addiction (Kleber 2011b). The series was published by the ACNP with the title “An Oral History of Neuropsychopharmacology Peer Interviews The First Fifty Years” and released at the 50th Anniversary Meeting of the College in 2011 (Ban 2011b). Herbert Daniel Kleber was born January 19, 1934, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. His family’s father’s side was from Vilnius, Lithuania, and the Mother’s side was from Germany. Both families came to the United State during the first decade of the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Drinking: More Than Just a Controversy 05/07/2007 08:37 AM
    Controlled Drinking: More Than Just a Controversy 05/07/2007 08:37 AM www.medscape.com To Print: Click your browser's PRINT button. NOTE: To view the article with Web enhancements, go to: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/473554 Controlled Drinking: More Than Just a Controversy Michael E. Saladin; Elizabeth J. Santa Ana Curr Opin Psychiatry 17(3):175-187, 2004. © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Posted 04/28/2004 Abstract and Introduction Abstract Purpose of Review: We intend to provide clinicians and clinical scientists with an overview of developments in the controlled-drinking literature, primarily since 2000. A brief description of the controversy surrounding controlled drinking provides a context for a discussion of various approaches to controlled drinking intervention as well as relevant clinical research. Recent Findings: Consistent with previous research, behavioral self-control training continues to be the most empirically validated controlled-drinking intervention. Recent research has focused on increasing both the accessibility/availability and efficacy of behavioral self-control training. Moderation-oriented cue exposure is a recent development in behaviorally oriented controlled drinking that yields treatment outcomes comparable to behavioral self-control training. The relative efficacy of moderation-oriented cue exposure versus behavioral self- control training may vary depending on the format of treatment delivery (group versus individual) and level of drinking severity. In general, the efficacy of both techniques does not appear to vary as a function of drinking severity but may vary as a function of drinking-related self-efficacy. Guided-self change is a relatively new and brief cognitive-behavioral intervention that has demonstrated efficacy with problem drinkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Opioid Antagonist Treatment for Opioid Addiction
    Advances in Opioid Antagonist Treatment for Opioid Addiction a, a b Walter Ling, MD *, Larissa Mooney, MD , Li-Tzy Wu, ScD KEYWORDS • Addiction treatment • Depot naltrexone • Opioid dependence • Relapse KEY POINTS • The major problem with oral naltrexone is noncompliance. Administration of naltrexone as an intramuscular injection may be less onerous and improve compliance because it occurs only once a month (ie, extended-release depot naltrexone). • To initiate treatment with extended-release depot naltrexone, steps should be taken to ensure that the patient is sufficiently free from physical dependence on opioids (eg, detoxification). • Research on naltrexone in combination with other medications suggests many opportu- nities for studying mixed receptor activities in the treatment of opioid and other drug addictions. PERSPECTIVE ON OPIOID ANTAGONIST TREATMENT FOR ADDICTION Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist derived from the analgesic oxymorphone, was synthesized as EN-1639A by Blumberg and colleagues in 1967. Four years later, in 1971, naltrexone was selected for high-priority development as a treatment for opioid addiction by the Special Action Office for Drug Abuse Prevention, an office created by President Nixon and put under the leadership of Dr Jerome Jaffe. Extinction Model The rationale for the antagonist approach to treating opioid addiction had been advanced by Dr Abraham Wikler a decade earlier, based largely on the extinction model explored in animal behavioral studies. It was believed that by blocking the euphorogenic effects of opioids at the opioid receptors, opiate use would become Disclosures: Dr Ling has served as a consultant to Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals and to Alkermes, Inc. Dr Mooney and Dr Wu report no relationships with commercial companies with any interest in the article’s subject matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Flashbacks and HPPD: a Clinical-Oriented Concise Review
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci - Vol. 51 - No 4 (2014) Flashbacks and HPPD: A Clinical-oriented Concise Review Arturo G. Lerner, MD,1-2 Dmitri Rudinski, MD,1 Oren Bor, MD,1 and Craig Goodman, PhD1 1 Lev Hasharon Mental Health Medical Center, Pardessya, Israel 2 Sackler School Of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel INTRODUCTION ABSTRACT Hallucinogens encompass a group of naturally occurring A unique characteristic of LSD, LSD-like and substances and synthetic substances (1) which may trigger a transient with hallucinogenic properties is the recurrence of some and generally reversible state of intoxication characterized or all the hallucinogenic symptoms which had appeared by perceptual disturbances primarily visual in nature, often during the intoxication after the immediate effects of the referred to as “trips” (2, 3). A unique characteristic of LSD substance had worn off. This recurring syndrome, mainly (lysergic acid diethylamide) and LSD-like substances is the visual, is not clearly understood. The terms Flashback total or partial recurrence of perceptual disturbances which and Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder (HPPD) appeared during previous intoxication and reappeared in have been used interchangeably in the professional the absence of voluntarily or involuntarily recent use (1-3). literature. We have observed at least two different This syndrome is still poorly understood (2, 3). LSD is the recurrent syndromes, the first Flashback Type we refer prototype of synthetic hallucinogenic substances and it is to as HPPD I, a generally short-term, non-distressing, probably the most investigated hallucinogen associated benign and reversible state accompanied by a pleasant with the etiology of this condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Concurrent Alcohol and Tobacco Dependence
    Concurrent Alcohol and Tobacco Dependence Mechanisms and Treatment David J. Drobes, Ph.D. People who drink alcohol often also smoke and vice versa. Several mechanisms may contribute to concurrent alcohol and tobacco use. These mechanisms include genes that are involved in regulating certain brain chemical systems; neurobiological mechanisms, such as cross-tolerance and cross-sensitization to both drugs; conditioning mechanisms, in which cravings for alcohol or nicotine are elicited by certain environmental cues; and psychosocial factors (e.g., personality characteristics and coexisting psychiatric disorders). Treatment outcomes for patients addicted to both alcohol and nicotine are generally worse than for people addicted to only one drug, and many treatment providers do not promote smoking cessation during alcoholism treatment. Recent findings suggest, however, that concurrent treatment for both addictions may improve treatment outcomes. KEY WORDS: comorbidity; AODD (alcohol and other drug dependence); alcoholic beverage; tobacco in any form; nicotine; smoking; genetic linkage; cross-tolerance; AOD (alcohol and other drug) sensitivity; neurotransmitters; brain reward pathway; cue reactivity; social AODU (AOD use); cessation of AODU; treatment outcome; combined modality therapy; literature review lcohol consumption and tobacco ers who are dependent on nicotine Department of Health and Human use are closely linked behaviors. have a 2.7 times greater risk of becoming Services 1989). The concurrent use of A Thus, not only are people who alcohol dependent than nonsmokers both drugs by pregnant women can drink alcohol more likely to smoke (and (e.g., Breslau 1995). Finally, although also result in more severe prenatal dam- vice versa) but also people who drink the smoking rate in the general popula­ age and neurocognitive deficits in their larger amounts of alcohol tend to smoke tion has gradually declined over the offspring than use of either drug alone more cigarettes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressoffice@Cityhal
    From: Mayor's Press Office <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 3:54 PM To: Mayor's Press Office Subject: DE BLASIO ADMINISTRATION LAUNCHES COMPREHENSIVE EFFORT TO REDUCE OPIOID MISUSE AND OVERDOSE DEATHS ACROSS THE CITY THE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE MAYOR NEW YORK, NY 10007 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 7, 2015 CONTACT: [email protected], (212) 788-2958 DE BLASIO ADMINISTRATION LAUNCHES COMPREHENSIVE EFFORT TO REDUCE OPIOID MISUSE AND OVERDOSE DEATHS ACROSS THE CITY City to make naloxone, overdose-reversing medication, available without a prescription at participating pharmacies in New York City New data shows 56 percent increase in unintentional opioid overdose deaths since 2010 NEW YORK—Mayor Bill de Blasio and First Lady Chirlane McCray today announced that beginning immediately, naloxone, a safe medication that can prevent death from opioid overdose, is available in pharmacies without a prescription. “Last year, this city experienced the equivalent of more than one fatal opioid overdose a day,” said Mayor Bill de Blasio. “These are people whose lives, once filled with promise, have been upended, leaving families to struggle with deep, lasting pain. We won’t accept this as our fate as a city – and we’ve resolved to do something about it.” “For any New Yorker who has ever worried about a loved one struggling with opioid dependency, today's announcement is an enormous relief. Anyone who fears they will one day find their child, spouse or sibling collapsed on the floor and not breathing now has the power to walk into a neighborhood pharmacy and purchase the medication that can reverse that nightmare.
    [Show full text]
  • Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives
    HEALTH AND MEDICINE DIVISION BOARD ON HEALTH SCIENCES POLICY Case and Comments on “Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives” Scott Steiger, MD, FACP, FASAM UCSF Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine and Psychiatry Deputy Medical Director, Opiate Treatment Outpatient Program Committee on Medication- Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder Sponsors • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Charge to the committee • Review current knowledge and gaps on the effectiveness of medications for OUD • Examine how medications can be effectively delivered, and in what settings and populations • Identify challenges in implementation and uptake • Identify additional research needed Committee members Alan Leshner, Ph.D. (Chair) Traci Green, Ph.D., M.Sc. American Associaon for the Advancement of Brown University/Boston University Science (ret.) Huda Akil, Ph.D. Alan Je=e, Ph.D. University of Michigan MGH Ins,tute of Health Professions Colleen Barry, Ph.D. Laura R. Lander, M.S.W. Johns Hopkins School of Public Health West Virginia University Kathleen Carroll, Ph.D. David Paerson Silver Wolf, Ph.D. Yale School of Medicine Washington University Chinazo Cunningham, M.D. Seun Ross, D.N.P. Albert Einstein College of Medicine American Nurses Associaon Walter Ginter Sco= Steiger, M.D. MARS Statewide Network University of California San Francisco Yasmin Hurd, Ph.D. David Vlahov, Ph.D., RN, FAAN, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Yale School of Nursing The Opioid Crisis in the U.S. • > 2 million people with OUD • > 47,000 people died from opioid overdose in 2017 alone • Tied to reemerging public health crisis of infectious disease • Socioeconomic consequences include health care costs, loss of productivity, criminal involvement, housing insecurity, impact on families Anna’s Story Opioid Use Disorder • Compulsive or uncontrolled use of prescription or illicit opioids in the face of negative consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Methadone Hydrochloride Tablets, USP) 5 Mg, 10 Mg Rx Only
    ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC. Columbus, OH 43216 DOLOPHINE® HYDROCHLORIDE CII (Methadone Hydrochloride Tablets, USP) 5 mg, 10 mg Rx Only Deaths, cardiac and respiratory, have been reported during initiation and conversion of pain patients to methadone treatment from treatment with other opioid agonists. It is critical to understand the pharmacokinetics of methadone when converting patients from other opioids (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Particular vigilance is necessary during treatment initiation, during conversion from one opioid to another, and during dose titration. Respiratory depression is the chief hazard associated with methadone hydrochloride administration. Methadone's peak respiratory depressant effects typically occur later, and persist longer than its peak analgesic effects, particularly in the early dosing period. These characteristics can contribute to cases of iatrogenic overdose, particularly during treatment initiation and dose titration. In addition, cases of QT interval prolongation and serious arrhythmia (torsades de pointes) have been observed during treatment with methadone. Most cases involve patients being treated for pain with large, multiple daily doses of methadone, although cases have been reported in patients receiving doses commonly used for maintenance treatment of opioid addiction. Methadone treatment for analgesic therapy in patients with acute or chronic pain should only be initiated if the potential analgesic or palliative care benefit of treatment with methadone is considered and outweighs the risks. Conditions For Distribution And Use Of Methadone Products For The Treatment Of Opioid Addiction Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42, Sec 8 Methadone products when used for the treatment of opioid addiction in detoxification or maintenance programs, shall be dispensed only by opioid treatment programs (and agencies, practitioners or institutions by formal agreement with the program sponsor) certified by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and approved by the designated state authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report
    Research Report Revised Junio 2018 Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Table of Contents Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Overview How do medications to treat opioid use disorder work? How effective are medications to treat opioid use disorder? What are misconceptions about maintenance treatment? What is the treatment need versus the diversion risk for opioid use disorder treatment? What is the impact of medication for opioid use disorder treatment on HIV/HCV outcomes? How is opioid use disorder treated in the criminal justice system? Is medication to treat opioid use disorder available in the military? What treatment is available for pregnant mothers and their babies? How much does opioid treatment cost? Is naloxone accessible? References Page 1 Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Discusses effective medications used to treat opioid use disorders: methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Overview An estimated 1.4 million people in the United States had a substance use disorder related to prescription opioids in 2019.1 However, only a fraction of people with prescription opioid use disorders receive tailored treatment (22 percent in 2019).1 Overdose deaths involving prescription opioids more than quadrupled from 1999 through 2016 followed by significant declines reported in both 2018 and 2019.2,3 Besides overdose, consequences of the opioid crisis include a rising incidence of infants born dependent on opioids because their mothers used these substances during pregnancy4,5 and increased spread of infectious diseases, including HIV and hepatitis C (HCV), as was seen in 2015 in southern Indiana.6 Effective prevention and treatment strategies exist for opioid misuse and use disorder but are highly underutilized across the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Overdose – Use of Naloxone
    CHAPTER: 41.3.1 Page 1 of 4 NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS MANUAL CHAPTER: 41.3.1 TITLE: OPIOID OVERDOSE – USE OF NALOXONE EFFECTIVE: 10/22/2017 REVISED: 06/24/2018 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to set forth guidelines with respect to the appropriate field administration of Naloxone (Narcan) kits by members of New Orleans Police Department in suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents. POLICY STATEMENT 1. Commissioned members of the NOPD are often the first emergency responders to the scene of a medical, suspected medical and overdose incident. Recognizing this, the NOPD has adopted this Chapter with the following goals: (a) To provide a framework for training in the field use of Naloxone, (b) To provide a framework on the proper field administration of Naloxone, and (c) To facilitate life-saving intervention in suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents where NOPD officers are the first to arrive on the scene. 2. All commissioned and/or civilian members who have been trained in the use and administration of the department’s Naloxone nasal administration kits for suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents are authorized to carry, use and administer the kits. 3. All members responding to medical calls, including suspected opioid overdoses, shall use universal precautions. DEFINITIONS: Definitions related to this Chapter include: Administration—Nasal administration of approved Naloxone 2mg kits with atomizer; 1mg (1/2 dose) to be administered in each nostril. Naloxone—A narcotic analgesic antagonist, used in the reversal of acute narcotic analgesic respiratory depression. Naloxone is effectively an antidote to opioid overdose and may completely reverse the effects of an opioid overdose if administered in time.
    [Show full text]
  • Styles of Secular Recovery
    White, W. & Nicolaus, M. (2005). Styles of secular recovery. Counselor, 6(4), 58-61. Styles of Secular Recovery William L. White and Martin Nicolaus The last essay in this column noted the growing diversity in religious, spiritual and secular frameworks of recovery and sketched the history of religious approaches to addiction recovery. This essay reviews the history and growing varieties of secular recovery and the implications of such diversity for the addictions professional. A History of Secular Recovery The history of non-religious, non-spiritual approaches to the resolution of alcohol and other drug problems begins with the Washingtonian Revival of the 1840s. The Washingtonians removed preachers and physicians from the temperance lectern in favor of men and women who, in the vernacular of the day, were “reformed” or were “reforming.” The Washingtonians replaced religious admonitions not to drink with 1) public confession of one’s addiction, 2) a signed pledge of abstinence, 3) visits to younger members, 4) economic assistance to new members, 5) experience sharing meetings, 6) outreach to the suffering drunkard, and 7) sober entertainment and fellowship. While many Washingtonians entered the life of their local churches, Washingtonian leaders were charged by their religious critics with committing the sin of humanism--placing their own will above the power of God. Recovery support societies that followed the Washingtonians took on a more religious orientation, but secular recovery groups continued in some of the mid- century moderation societies, ribbon reform clubs and support societies that grew out of early treatment institutions, e.g. the Ollapod Club and the Keeley Leagues.
    [Show full text]