DOCSLIB.ORG

Vol. 86 Friday, No. 32 February 19, 2021 Pages 10171–10438

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vol. 86 Friday, No. 32 February 19, 2021 Pages 10171–10438 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 22:39 Feb 18, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\19FEWS.LOC 19FEWS tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with WS.LOC II Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 32 / Friday, February 19, 2021 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, under the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) Subscriptions: and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Government Publishing Office, is the exclusive distributor of the official edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general (Toll-Free) applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published FEDERAL AGENCIES by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Email [email protected] issuing agency requests earlier filing. For a list of documents Phone 202–741–6000 currently on file for public inspection, see www.federalregister.gov. The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration The Federal Register Printing Savings Act of 2017 (Pub. L. 115- authenticates the Federal Register as the official serial publication 120) placed restrictions on distribution of official printed copies established under the Federal Register Act. Under 44 U.S.C. 1507, of the daily Federal Register to members of Congress and Federal the contents of the Federal Register shall be judicially noticed. offices. Under this Act, the Director of the Government Publishing The Federal Register is published in paper and on 24x microfiche. Office may not provide printed copies of the daily Federal Register It is also available online at no charge at www.govinfo.gov, a unless a Member or other Federal office requests a specific issue service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office. or a subscription to the print edition. For more information on how to subscribe use the following website link: https:// The online edition of the Federal Register is issued under the www.gpo.gov/frsubs. authority of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register as the official legal equivalent of the paper and microfiche editions (44 U.S.C. 4101 and 1 CFR 5.10). It is updated by 6:00 a.m. each day the Federal Register is published and includes both text and graphics from Volume 1, 1 (March 14, 1936) forward. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Publishing Office. Phone 202-512-1800 or 866-512- 1800 (toll free). E-mail, gpocusthelp.com. The annual subscription price for the Federal Register paper edition is $860 plus postage, or $929, for a combined Federal Register, Federal Register Index and List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA) subscription; the microfiche edition of the Federal Register including the Federal Register Index and LSA is $330, plus postage. Six month subscriptions are available for one-half the annual rate. The prevailing postal rates will be applied to orders according to the delivery method requested. The price of a single copy of the daily Federal Register, including postage, is based on the number of pages: $11 for an issue containing less than 200 pages; $22 for an issue containing 200 to 400 pages; and $33 for an issue containing more than 400 pages. Single issues of the microfiche edition may be purchased for $3 per copy, including postage. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, or charge to your GPO Deposit Account, VISA, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover. Mail to: U.S. Government Publishing Office—New Orders, P.O. Box 979050, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000; or call toll free 1-866-512-1800, DC area 202-512-1800; or go to the U.S. Government Online Bookstore site, see bookstore.gpo.gov. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal Register. How To Cite This Publication: Use the volume number and the page number. Example: 86 FR 12345. Postmaster: Send address changes to the Superintendent of Documents, Federal Register, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, along with the entire mailing label from the last issue received. VerDate Sep 11 2014 22:39 Feb 18, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\19FEWS.LOC 19FEWS tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with WS.LOC III Contents Federal Register Vol. 86, No. 32 Friday, February 19, 2021 Agriculture Department Council on Environmental Quality See Rural Business-Cooperative Service NOTICES NOTICES National Environmental Policy Act Guidance on Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 10252 Submissions, and Approvals, 10233–10235 Census Bureau Drug Enforcement Administration NOTICES NOTICES Urban Areas for the 2020 Census?Proposed Criteria, 10237– Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: 10243 Patheon API Manufacturing, Inc., 10353 Decision and Order: Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services Ibrahim Al-Qawaqneh, D.D.S., 10354–10357 NOTICES Michael W. Carlton, M.D., 10337–10353 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Milad I. Shaker, M.D., 10335–10337 Submissions, and Approvals, 10282–10283 Importer of Controlled Substances Application: VHG Labs DBA LGC Standards, 10357–10358 Children and Families Administration NOTICES Education Department Administration for Native Americans’ Program Policies and Procedures, 10283–10285 PROPOSED RULES Rehabilitation Short-Term Training: Civil Rights Commission Client Assistance Program, 10213–10218 NOTICES NOTICES Meetings: Applications for New Awards: Illinois Advisory Committee, 10236–10237 Disability Innovation Fund; Career Advancement Minnesota Advisory Committee, 10236 Initiative Model Demonstration Project, Corrections, 10252–10253 Coast Guard Training and Information for Parents of Children With RULES Disabilities; Community Parent Resource Centers, Special Local Regulations: 10253–10260 Mark Hahn Memorial 300 PWC Endurance Race, Lake Havasu City, AZ, 10173–10174 Energy Department NOTICES See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, PROPOSED RULES Submissions, and Approvals, 10329–10330 Energy Conservation Program: Procedures for Use in New or Revised Energy Commerce Department Conservation Standards and Test Procedures for See Census Bureau Consumer Products and Commercial/Industrial See Foreign-Trade Zones Board Equipment; Prioritization Process, 10211–10213 See International Trade Administration NOTICES See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Application To Export Electric Energy: See Patent and Trademark Office Mercuria Commodities Canada Corp., 10260 Ontario Power Generation Inc., 10260–10261 Commodity Futures Trading Commission NOTICES Meetings: Environmental Protection Agency Global Markets Advisory Committee, 10251–10252 RULES Amendment to the Exemption From the Requirement of a Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Tolerance: NOTICES Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids, 10178–10180 Funding Opportunity: PROPOSED RULES Applications for Financial Assistance Awards or Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Technical Assistance Grants Under the Community Promulgations: Development Financial Institutions Program Fiscal California; Placer County Air Pollution Control District; Year 2021 Funding Round, 10390–10413 Open Burning Rules, 10225–10226 Applications for Financial Assistance Awards or Oregon; Smoke Management Revision, 10220–10225 Technical Assistance grants Under the Native United States Virgin Islands; Regional Haze Federal American CDFI Assistance (NACA Program) Fiscal Implementation Plan; Correction, 10227–10232 Year 2021 Funding Round, 10413–10432 NOTICES Manufacturer Request for Risk Evaluation Under the Toxic Copyright Office, Library of Congress Substances Control Act: RULES Chemical Category for Octahydro-tetramethyl- Secure Tests, 10174–10177 naphthalenyl-ethanone, 10267–10269 VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:39 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4748 Sfmt 4748 E:\FR\FM\19FECN.SGM 19FECN tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with CONTENTS IV Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 32 / Friday, February 19, 2021 / Contents National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System: Foreign-Trade Zones Board 2021 Issuance of the Multi-Sector General Permit for NOTICES Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Authorization of Production Activity: Activity, 10269–10278 Coating Place, Inc., Foreign-Trade Zone 266, Dane Ozone Transport Commission Recommendation That EPA County, Wisconsin, 10243–10244 Require Daily Limits for Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides From Certain Sources in Pennsylvania: Health and Human Services Department
Recommended publications
  • QATAR V. BAHRAIN) REPLY of the STATE of QATAR ______TABLE of CONTENTS PART I - INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I - GENERAL 1 Section 1

    QATAR V. BAHRAIN) REPLY of the STATE of QATAR ______TABLE of CONTENTS PART I - INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I - GENERAL 1 Section 1

    CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION AND TERRITORIAL QUESTIONS BETWEEN QATAR AND BAHRAIN (QATAR V. BAHRAIN) REPLY OF THE STATE OF QATAR _____________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I - GENERAL 1 Section 1. Qatar's Case and Structure of Qatar's Reply Section 2. Deficiencies in Bahrain's Written Pleadings Section 3. Bahrain's Continuing Violations of the Status Quo PART II - THE GEOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND CHAPTER II - THE TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY OF QATAR Section 1. The Overall Geographical Context Section 2. The Emergence of the Al-Thani as a Political Force in Qatar Section 3. Relations between the Al-Thani and Nasir bin Mubarak Section 4. The 1913 and 1914 Conventions Section 5. The 1916 Treaty Section 6. Al-Thani Authority throughout the Peninsula of Qatar was consolidated long before the 1930s Section 7. The Map Evidence CHAPTER III - THE EXTENT OF THE TERRITORY OF BAHRAIN Section 1. Bahrain from 1783 to 1868 Section 2. Bahrain after 1868 PART III - THE HAWAR ISLANDS AND OTHER TERRITORIAL QUESTIONS CHAPTER IV - THE HAWAR ISLANDS Section 1. Introduction: The Territorial Integrity of Qatar and Qatar's Sovereignty over the Hawar Islands Section 2. Proximity and Qatar's Title to the Hawar Islands Section 3. The Extensive Map Evidence supporting Qatar's Sovereignty over the Hawar Islands Section 4. The Lack of Evidence for Bahrain's Claim to have exercised Sovereignty over the Hawar Islands from the 18th Century to the Present Day Section 5. The Bahrain and Qatar Oil Concession Negotiations between 1925 and 1939 and the Events Leading to the Reversal of British Recognition of Hawar as part of Qatar Section 6.
  • Canada-U.S. Relations

    Canada-U.S. Relations

    Canada-U.S. Relations Updated February 10, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov 96-397 SUMMARY 96-397 Canada-U.S. Relations February 10, 2021 The United States and Canada typically enjoy close relations. The two countries are bound together by a common 5,525-mile border—“the longest undefended border in the world”—as Peter J. Meyer well as by shared history and values. They have extensive trade and investment ties and long- Specialist in Latin standing mutual security commitments under NATO and North American Aerospace Defense American and Canadian Command (NORAD). Canada and the United States also cooperate closely on intelligence and Affairs law enforcement matters, placing a particular focus on border security and cybersecurity initiatives in recent years. Ian F. Fergusson Specialist in International Although Canada’s foreign and defense policies usually are aligned with those of the United Trade and Finance States, disagreements arise from time to time. Canada’s Liberal Party government, led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, has prioritized multilateral efforts to renew and strengthen the rules- based international order since coming to power in November 2015. It expressed disappointment with former President Donald Trump’s decisions to withdraw from international organizations and accords, and it questioned whether the United States was abandoning its global leadership role. Cooperation on international issues may improve under President Joe Biden, who spoke with Prime Minister Trudeau in his first call to a foreign leader and expressed interest in working with Canada to address climate change and other global challenges. The United States and Canada have a deep economic partnership, with approximately $1.4 billion of goods crossing the border each day in 2020.
  • Republicans' Mexican-American Presidential Candidate: Mitt Romney?

    Republicans' Mexican-American Presidential Candidate: Mitt Romney?

    Republicans’ Mexican-American Presidential Candidate: Mitt Romney? By Ted J. Chiappari and Angelo A. Paparelli* Four years ago, one of the challenges to President Barack Obama’s Constitutional eligibility for the presidency as a “natural born Citizen” was based on his ostensible dual citizenship at birth and the divided loyalties1 that can result from multiple citizenships. More recently, Mitt Romney’s Mexican heritage made it into the news because of Newt Gingrich’s claim that Romney was “anti- immigrant.”2 Reports of Mitt Romney’s eligibility for Mexican citizenship appeared around the same time.3 With the suspension of Rick Santorum’s presidential campaign and Newt Gingrich’s concession that Mitt Romney will probably be the Republican Party’s 2012 candidate, Romney and Obama are beginning in earnest to highlight their differences. Since both candidates are facing the potential liability of having a father born abroad (George Romney in Mexico and Barack Obama Sr. in Kenya) from whom eligibility for dual citizenship may flow, it is unlikely that either candidate will wish to highlight his opponent’s transnational ties. If they did, as unlikely as it may be, a brief reflection on the issue could result in a new appreciation of the intricacies of the U.S. citizenship laws. In the wake of the last presidential election, we explored the complexities of U.S. citizenship law in connection with the candidacies of both Senator John McCain – born in the Panama Canal Zone – and then President-Elect Obama.4 Given Mitt Romney’s birth in Detroit, no one is questioning that he is a “natural born Citizen” eligible to be President pursuant to Article II of the 1 Competing loyalties have long been a concern in policy and legal arguments against dual citizenship.
  • Biden-Environmental-Report-Card.Pdf

    Biden-Environmental-Report-Card.Pdf

    PRESIDENT BIDEN’S ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CARD SEMESTER ONE C- July 2021 C- “Needs Improvement” January 2022 July 2022 January 2023 July 2023 Biden photo by Gage Skidmore, CC-BY-SA Skidmore, Gage by photo Biden January 2024 FINAL GRADE In July 2020 Joe Biden said: “If I have the honor of being elected president, we’re not just going to tinker around the edges….We’re going to lock in progress that no future president can roll back or undercut to take us backwards again.”1 One month later, when he accepted the nomination of his party, Biden had set forth the most ambitious climate and environmental agenda of any nominee for a major political party. Acknowledging that the Green New Deal provided a “crucial framework,” Biden’s campaign promised to embrace “greater ambition on an epic scale” to meet the scope of the climate crisis and other environmental challenges.2 And during the final presidential debate, Biden vowed that he would push the United States to “transition away from the oil industry.”3 The Biden campaign released two environmental policy platforms: the Plan to Secure Environmental Justice and Equitable Economic Opportunity and the Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice. In addition, shortly before Biden accepted the Democratic nomination, the Biden-Sanders Unity Task Force strengthened the environmental positions of the Biden campaign, releasing a comprehensive set of policy recommendations to address the climate crisis.4 We identified and reviewed the 25 most important, specific and achievable environmental promises President Biden made during the campaign as set forth in these three key policy documents.
  • Legal Status of the Virgin Islands Divorces

    Legal Status of the Virgin Islands Divorces

    LEGAL STATUS OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVORCES By VimN D. CALLoWAY, JR.* L Introduction In recent months it has become increasingly popular among United States citizens seeking divorces to forsake the time-honored trek to Reno, and head instead for the outlying territory of the Virgin Islands. This change in direction of the so called "divorce trade" is due to the comparative ease with which one can obtain a divorce decree and the attractions of the Islands. For those who can afford the trip, it is thought that two birds can be killed with one stone, so to speak: a divorce obtained and a restful vacation enjoyed. By provision of Congress, the Legislative Assembly of the Virgin Islands was set up to enact legislation applicable to the Virgin Islands as a whole,' the District Court of the Virgin Islands being given jurisdiction of all cases of divorce and annulment of mar- 2 riage. The current divorce law was enacted by the eighth Legislative Assembly of the Virgin Islands on December 18, 1944; approved December 29, 1944, by the acting Governor; and went into effect on January 28, 1945. The law gives as grounds3 for either party to obtain a legal separation, or to have their marriage contract dis- solved, at the plantiff's option, for: adultery, cruelty, impotency, desertion for one year, habitual drunkenness for one year, convic- 4 tion of a felony, insanity, and incompatibility of temperament. If the marriage was not celebrated in the district of the suit, before commencing action, the plaintiff must have been an inhabi- tant for a six-week period; such period being declared "Sufficient to give the court jurisdiction without regard to the place where the marriage was performed or the cause of action arose."'5 When the dissolution judgment has become final, and after the expiration of * 2nd year law student, Duke University; A.B.
  • Federal Register

    Federal Register

    FEDERAL REGISTER Vol. 86 Wednesday No. 104 June 2, 2021 Pages 29483–29674 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 19:05 Jun 01, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\02JNWS.LOC 02JNWS jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_WS II Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 104 / Wednesday, June 2, 2021 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, under the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) Subscriptions: and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Government Publishing Office, is the exclusive distributor of the official edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general (Toll-Free) applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published FEDERAL AGENCIES by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Email [email protected] issuing agency requests earlier filing.
  • The Iucn Ael Journal of Environmental Law

    The Iucn Ael Journal of Environmental Law

    THE IUCN AEL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW APRIL 2021 Issue 11 1 A Word From the Editors IUCN AEL Journal of Environmental Law, Issue 11 We are very honoured to be in charge of the two editions of the AEL Journal of Environmental Law. This has a unique role and is part of an invaluable and collegial network of scholars. We admire the efforts of all our predecessors. We have not changed anything to a formula that has allowed the Journal to share innovative analyses and critical thinking on policy and legal developments in the field of environmental protection. It remains a doubly open journal, on the one hand because we operate on the basis of a call for contributions favouring a broad representation, in particular of young or emerging colleagues, and on the other hand because the journal is fully in open access. In this eleventh issue, the reader will find in Part 1 a special feature on “Democracy, emergency powers, anti-protest laws and the consequences of Covid-19”. In the context of the pandemic, executive governments were given unprecedented exceptional powers. Environmental democracy has regressed here and there. Environmental law itself has regressed in some countries. Some regulations have been bracketed in view of the health and economic emergency. In this regard, Michel Prieur (France), who is considered as the “father” of environmental law in France, analyses two courageous decisions from a Brazilian Federal judge in Amazonia that make an unprecedented link between deforestation, the extension of Covid-19 and the health of indigenous peoples. Will the Escazú Agreement be a game changer regarding public participation for vulnerable groups amid a global pandemic? This is the question answered by Jakub Ciesielczuk and Gabriel Lopez Porras (United Kingdom) who analyse the implementation challenges of this recently entered into force treaty.
  • The US Federal Framework and American Samoa

    The US Federal Framework and American Samoa

    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BOTHELL Constitutional Ambiguity as Policy: The U.S. Federal Framework and American Samoa Kerry L Francis 6/9/2014 A Capstone project presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Policy Studies, School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, UWB. Acknowledgements I would like to extend my heartfelt appreciation to Professor Camille Walsh for her helpful guidance and indispensable insight in the writing of this paper; and to Professor Johanna Crane, whose comments greatly factored in the paper’s final outcome. Also, I must acknowledge Professors Alan Wood, Bruce Kochis, Daniel Goldhaber, Daniel Jacoby, Keith Nitta, Nives Dolšak, and Shauna Carlisle, whose instruction imparted in me in each their own way, something beyond the learning of the course and program curriculum in the classroom. And finally—to Jennifer—whose steady encouragement, counsel and friendship since those sunny years in high school, bumped and pushed me along to this moment. i For Noah. ii Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter I – the Policy Problem…………………………………………………………………….2 Chapter II – Literature Review……………………………………………………………….........9 Chapter III – Methodology……………………………………………………………………….21 Discussion of Methods…………………………………………………………………...23 Chapter IV – Results and Discussion..............................................................................................26 South Pacific Preludes……………………………………………………………………31 The Deeds of Cession and the Early Phase of
  • Congressional Record-Senate. March 31

    Congressional Record-Senate. March 31

    , 3550 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. MARCH 31, amending the interstate-commerce law-to the Committee on In- PETITIONS AND ME.MORIA.LS, terstate and Foreign Commerce. - · l\Ir.,HANSBROUGH. I presentresolutions adopted a.ta. meet­ Also, resolution of the San Diego (Cal.) Chamber of Commerce, ing of citizens of South Minnewaukon Township, in the county for the passage of House bill No. 7097, providing for a reorganfaa­ of Ramsey, N. Dak., declaring in favor og the Boers in South- ~ tion of the consular service-to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. Africa, against a tariff as to Puerto Rico, against the ship-subsidy By Mr. NORTON of Ohio: Petition of E. B. Hubbard and other bill, and against the war in the Philippines. I ask that the reso­ druggists of Tiffin, Ohio, for the repeal of the stamp tax on medi­ lutions, which can not be sent to any particnlar committee, be cines, etc.-to the Committee on Ways and Means. printed in th~ RECORD . • Also, papers to accompany House bill No. 7798, for the relief of There being no objection, the resolutions were ordered to lie on Dentpn Whipf?-to the Co~mittee on Military Affairs. the table and to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: Also, resolution of the Ohio Association of Local Fire Insurance Agents urging the passage of House bill No. 6252, relating to the SOUTH MrnNEWAUK.AN TOWNSHIP, N. DAK., March 19, 1900. collection of tax on fire-insurance policies-to the Committee on To the Senators and Rep1·esentative of North Dakota in Congress: Tile residents of Sou th Minnewaukan Township in mass meeting assembled.
  • A Hand-Book on the Annexation of Hawaii

    A Hand-Book on the Annexation of Hawaii

    A HAND-BOOK ....ON THE.... ANNEXATION OF HAWAII BY "" LORRIN A. THURS|TjQK nWvF; If;IMJ • 1. Shall Hawaii Be Annexed? . / . 1 ' 2. Arguments in Favor of Annexation i . 3 3. A Brief Description of Hawaii, its People, Govern- ment, Laws, Commerce, Finances, Educational System and Resources . .20 4. Twenty Objections to Annexation and Replies . thereto . .27 5. A Digest of the Official Opinions of American Presidents, Secretaries of State, Ministers, and Military and Naval Officers concerning the Annexation or Control of Hawaii . -47 6. President Harrison’s Message to the Senate Ad- . vocating Annexation . -49 7. President McKinley’s Message to the Senate Ad- vocating Annexation . -50 8. Report of Secretary Sherman to President McKinley Advocating Annexation . -59 9. A Digest of the Acts of Congress and of Hawaii concerning American Control or Annexation of Hawaii .........74 10. Text of the Hawaiian Annexation Treaties of 1854, 1893, and 1897; and of the Reciprocity and - Pearl Harbor Treaties of 1875 and 1887 . -77 be no near to and passing as States. and a there Station. numbered to failed, the Fernandez, coast United Supply coal the between only and Juan to which the connecting and American there, islands is water, belongs line the Hawaii wood, Callao, near station small black so Honolulu, the which near are naval of heavyfurnish of a within and any the can on, west on Pacific by Gallapagos, miles establish or the which to of spot depended 1867there Hawaii. in portion is be surrounded one it. thousanda the spacebut spot of madeavailable is part Island, now the that cannot a was 1.
  • 751-100-055, Issue 9, in Its Entirety

    751-100-055, Issue 9, in Its Entirety

    ......·.·.·.·.·········;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.:.:.:.:·:·:····;-;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.:.;.:.;.:-:·:·:·:·:·:··························································· .·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.•.•••··· ······.·.·.·.·.·.·······································:·:·:·:·:·:;;;:;:.:;:;:;;;;;:;:;·;·;·;·;·;·;·;·;·:·:·:·:·:·:.;.;.;.;.;.;.;•......... ·•·.·.·. Bellcore Practice Bellcore BR 751·100·055 Issue 1 0, August 1995 @Bell Cornrnunication Research COMMON LANGUAGE® STATE, PROVINCE, TERRITORY, COUNTRY AND UNIQUE CODES CONTENTS PAGE 1. PURPOSE.............................................................................................. 3 2. SCOPE ................................................................................................. 3 3. REASON FOR ISSUE............................................................................ 3 4. GENERAL . ... .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. ... .. .. .. 4 5. STATE CODE....................................................................................... 4 6. UNIQUE LOCATIONS: PLACE AND STATE CODES 6 Tables A. States of the United States (US) Codes................................................... 8 United States Outlying and Pacific Ocean Territories Codes .................. 9 States of Mexico (MX) Codes ................................................................. 10 Provinces and Territories of Canada (CN) Codes................................... 11 Unique Locations Codes . .. ... ... ............. ... .. .. ..... ....... ...........
  • 6560-50-P Environmental Protection Agency 40 Cfr

    6560-50-P Environmental Protection Agency 40 Cfr

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/19/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-09545, and on govinfo.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 9 and 84 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0044; FRL-10023-08-OAR] RIN 2060-AV17 Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Establishing the Allowance Allocation and Trading Program under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to issue regulations to implement certain provisions of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act, as enacted on December 27, 2020. This rulemaking proposes to: establish the hydrofluorocarbon production and consumption baselines based on historical data; establish the allowance allocation program to phase down hydrofluorocarbon production and consumption; determine an initial methodology to allocating allowances and allowing for the transfer of those allowances; establish provisions for the international transfer of allowances; establish requirements to support compliance with phasing down hydrofluorocarbon production and consumption; establish recordkeeping and reporting requirements; release certain data to provide transparency and support implementation of the program; and, address certain other elements related to the effective implementation of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act. In addition to the proposed provisions, EPA is seeking advance input on how the Agency may alter its determination of company-specific allocations in later years. EPA is considering these issues, and therefore is seeking public input on them, but is not making any particular proposal in relation to them, and therefore will not finalize any requirements on these topics before issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking and requesting public comment.