DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT Lake Elmo Airport 2035 Long-Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT Lake Elmo Airport 2035 Long-Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) DRAFT Lake Elmo Airport 2035 Long-Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) Released for Public Review June 22, 2015 Prepared jointly by the Airport Development & Environment Departments Lake Elmo Airport 2035 LTCP Metropolitan Airports Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... i ES.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ i ES.2 AIRPORT ROLE ......................................................................................................... i ES.3 FORECASTS .............................................................................................................iii ES.4 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................... v ES.5 ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED FOR DEVELOPMENT ...............................................vi ES.6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................. xiii ES.7 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ...................................................................................... xiv ES.8 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS ...................................................................... xvi 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................... 1-1 1.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 AIRPORT HISTORY ............................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 AIRPORT CLASSIFICATION AND CONTEXT ...................................................... 1-4 1.4.1 MAC Classification ........................................................................................ 1-5 1.4.2 FAA Classification ......................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.3 MnDOT Classification .................................................................................... 1-6 1.4.4 Metropolitan Council Classification ................................................................ 1-6 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 IMPROVEMENTS SINCE LAST LTCP ................................................................... 2-1 2.3 EXISTING AIRSIDE FACILITIES ........................................................................... 2-1 2.3.1 Pavement Areas and Design Standards ........................................................ 2-1 2.3.2 Lighting and On-Airport Navigational Aids ..................................................... 2-9 2.3.3 Airspace ...................................................................................................... 2-10 2.3.4 Approach Instrumentation ............................................................................ 2-11 2.3.5 14 CFR Part 77 Airspace Surfaces .............................................................. 2-11 2.4 EXISTING LANDSIDE FACILITIES ...................................................................... 2-12 2.4.1 Fixed Base Operator (FBO) ......................................................................... 2-13 2.4.2 Hangar Storage Areas ................................................................................. 2-13 2.4.3 Maintenance and Equipment Areas ............................................................. 2-15 2.4.4 Roadway Access and Vehicle Parking Areas .............................................. 2-15 2.5 AIRPORT ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................. 2-16 2.5.1 Drainage ...................................................................................................... 2-16 2.5.2 Utilities ......................................................................................................... 2-17 2.6 OFF-AIRPORT LAND USE .................................................................................. 2-18 3. AVIATION FORECASTS ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 HISTORICAL ACTIVITY LEVELS .......................................................................... 3-1 3.3 SOCIOECONOMIC PROJECTIONS ...................................................................... 3-2 Lake Elmo Airport 2035 LTCP Metropolitan Airports Commission 3.4 BASE CASE FORECAST ...................................................................................... 3-3 3.5 FORECAST SCENARIOS ...................................................................................... 3-5 3.6 FORECAST SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 3-6 4. FACILITY REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 CRITICAL AIRCRAFT FAMILY DESIGN CRITERIA .............................................. 4-1 4.3 METEOROLOGICAL DATA, WIND COVERAGE, AND RUNWAY ORIENTATION ............................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.4 AIRFIELD CAPACITY ............................................................................................ 4-3 4.5 AIRFIELD FACILITY REQUIREMENTS ................................................................. 4-4 4.5.1 Runway Requirements .................................................................................. 4-4 4.5.2 Taxiway Requirements .................................................................................. 4-7 4.5.3 Instrument Approaches .................................................................................. 4-8 4.6 LANDSIDE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS ............................................................... 4-8 4.6.1 Hangar Facilities ............................................................................................ 4-8 4.6.2 Fixed Base Operator...................................................................................... 4-9 4.6.3 Airport Access, Roadway Circulation, and Parking ........................................ 4-9 4.6.4 Maintenance and Fuel Storage Areas .......................................................... 4-10 4.6.5 Security Requirements ................................................................................ 4-10 5. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................ 5-1 5.2.1 Evaluation Criteria ......................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.2 Base Case ..................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.3 Alternative A .................................................................................................. 5-2 5.2.4 Alternative B .................................................................................................. 5-3 5.2.5 Alternative C .................................................................................................. 5-4 5.2.6 30th Street N Realignment Alternatives .......................................................... 5-5 5.3 SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ............................................. 5-6 6. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................. 6-1 6.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 AIRCRAFT NOISE ................................................................................................. 6-1 6.2.1 Quantifying Aircraft Noise .............................................................................. 6-1 6.2.2 Noise Contour Development .......................................................................... 6-3 6.2.3 Baseline Condition Noise Impacts ................................................................. 6-8 6.2.4 2035 Preferred Alternative Condition Noise Impacts ...................................... 6-8 6.3 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER ......................................................................... 6-9 6.4 WETLANDS ......................................................................................................... 6-10 6.5 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................ 6-10 7. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ................................................................................ 7-1 7.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA ............................................................... 7-1 7.2.1 Federal Aviation Administration Land Use Compatibility Guidelines .............
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Who Will Win the Most Prestigious Trophy in Aviation
    National Aeronautic Association FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: David Ivey, 703-527-0226 February 16, 2006 ECLIPSE AVIATION WINS 2005 COLLIER TROPHY Eclipse Aviation Corporation has won the 2005 Robert J. Collier Trophy "for the greatest achievement in aeronautics or astronautics in America.” The 95 year-old trophy, aviation’s most prestigious award, will be presented to the company “for leadership, innovation, and the advancement of general aviation” in the production of very light jets, specifically, the Eclipse 500. Eclipse joins past winners of the trophy including Orville Wright, Howard Hughes, Chuck Yeager, Scott Crossfield, the crew of Apollo 11, and SpaceShipOne. The award has been administered by the National Aeronautic Association (NAA) since 1911. Announcing the 2005 winner, NAA President and CEO David Ivey said the selection committee’s criteria included recognition of the rich heritage of the Collier Trophy, and “the spirit of entrepreneurship, technical innovation, and the impact on American aviation,” exemplified by the Eclipse 500. Led by Eclipse’s founder, president and CEO Vern Raburn, Eclipse is applying innovations created in the technology industry to drive down cost, increase performance, improve safety, and spur a new type of air travel—the air taxi. Innovations to the Eclipse 500 including friction stir welding, the PhostrEx™ fire suppression system, electromechanical actuators and digital electronics with integrated software. Perhaps the company’s greatest contribution is making jet technology available to a larger segment of the population. With an acquisition cost one-third of today’s small jets and the lowest operating cost per mile of any jet, the Eclipse 500 provides the lowest jet costs ever achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: History of Fire Suppression in Aircraft
    Chapter 2: HISTORY OF FIRE Donald P. Bein SUPPRESSION IN AIRCRAFTi Naval Air Systems Command TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 Fire Threats to Military Aircraft ........................................................................................20 2.2 Protected Compartments on Aircraft .................................................................................24 2.2.1 Engine Nacelles.......................................................................................................24 2.2.2 Other Powerplant-type Compartments....................................................................28 2.2.3 Dry Bay Compartments...........................................................................................31 2.2.4 Cargo Compartments...............................................................................................34 2.2.5 Other Compartments ...............................................................................................36 2.2.6 Fuel Tank Ullage.....................................................................................................37 2.3 Types of Fires Experienced ...............................................................................................41 2.3.1 Safety-related Fires..................................................................................................43 2.3.2 Ballistically-induced Fires.......................................................................................45 2.3.3 Spray Fires...............................................................................................................47
    [Show full text]
  • View PDF(940
    FactSheet National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 FS-2004-07-94-LaRC ________________________________________________________________________________________ SMALL AIRCRAFT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM NASA-led technologies could increase air travel access NASA is preparing to demonstrate how the latest technologies could significantly enhance operating capabilities of small aircraft, allowing, for example, flights into and out of small airports without radar or towers. This Cirrus SR-22 is being used as a flying testbed for SATS research at NASA’s Langley Research Center. The SATS concept would support propeller and jet aircraft for business and personal transportation for on-demand, point-to-point trips, as well as scheduled service. Travel concept to be demonstrated The SATS concept offers an on-demand, point-to-point, NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and widely distributed transportation system. It relies on the National Consortium for Aviation Mobility (NCAM) advanced four to ten passenger aircraft using new are working toward a June, 2005 demonstration of a operating capabilities. Such a system promises improved supplemental system to congested interstate highways and safety, efficiency, reliability and affordability for small major "hub" airports. aircraft operating within the nation's 5,400 public-use- landing facilities. Nearly all of the U.S. population lives By enhancing the capabilities of small aircraft and small within a 30-minute drive of at least one of
    [Show full text]
  • Eclipse Buyers FAQ.Pages
    Eclipse Aircraft Buyer’s Guide & FAQ Public Edition v1.22 Updated 3/23/21 AEROCOR • Better Results From Better Data • 747-777-9505 About AEROCOR Welcome to the world of Eclipse! We created this guide as a tool to help buyers better understand all aspects of the aircraft and the ownership experience. As the world’s largest broker of pre-owned Eclipse aircraft, AEROCOR is uniquely qualified to educate buyers about all aspects of Eclipse acquisitions and ownership. AEROCOR is one of the most successful light aircraft sales organizations in the world. By utilizing a unique method of combining proprietary market data with model specific aircraft knowledge, AEROCOR helps guide buyers to the right value. Key highlights include: • Focus on Light Aircraft - AEROCOR strictly focuses on owner-flown aircraft, such as the Eclipse aircraft line. This allows us to fully understand the specific nuances and ultimately the specific values of these aircraft • Proven Track Record - AEROCOR produces results that no other organization can match. • Unique Incentives - AEROCOR is the only organization in the world that can offer unique incentives together with pre-owned Eclipse aircraft. • Proprietary Market Data - We constantly gather market data that applies to your specific airplane. This allows you to buy or sell with confidence, knowing that you are getting the right price for your aircraft. AEROCOR • Better Results From Better Data • 747-777-9505 Table of Contents Styling Options Exterior Color Schemes (Standard) ........................................................04
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Light Jet Arrives: Stakeholders and Their Perceptions
    Journal of Air Transportation Vol. 12, No. 1 -2007 THE VERY LIGHT JET ARRIVES: STAKEHOLDERS AND THEIR PERCEPTIONS Richard Cobb Jacksonville State University Jacksonville, Alabama James L. Thomas Jacksonville State University Jacksonville, Alabama Laura A. Cobb Auburn University Auburn, Alabama ABSTRACT This article summarizes the initial results of a systematic study that addressed issues related to the direct and indirect market impact of very light jet (VLJ) aircraft. Although reports in the popular press offer wide-ranging estimates of the impact that these new jets will have on existing air travel, no systematic data exists that may be of use to all potential stakeholders. This introductory study serves to describe potential VLJ users and their perceptions of this new type of aircraft. _____________________________________________________________________________ Richard Cobb (Ph.D., The University of Alabama) is a professor of management at Jacksonville State University. His research has appeared in such publications as Simulation, Quality Progress, Academy of Strategic Management, Journal of Air Transport Management, and the Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies. He has been published in numerous conference proceedings. James L. Thomas (Ph.D., University of Mississippi) is currently an associate professor of marketing at Jacksonville State University. His research has appeared in such publications as the Journal of Retailing, Business Ethics Quarterly, Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, and the Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice. He has also published papers in several national and regional conference proceedings. Laura A. Cobb (MBA, Auburn University) is a cost specialist in the market research and technology department of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Eclipse 500 Program Update
    Pilot Report 2 Business & Commercial Aviation ■ July 2005 www.AviationNow.com/BCA Eclipse 500 Program Update We fly the first VLJ in production configuration during a break in the race to March 2006 certification. Text by Fred George most of the engineering and development. gines. Raburn and his determined team eval- Photography by Phil Forbert Both would share the revenues from sales. uated alternative engine designs, such as the “In aviation, it’s always the engines that Agilis TF1000, Honda HF118, Honeywell have changed things. Sam’s company already LTF101 and Pratt & Whitney Canada had won NASA’s GAP [General Aviation PW600 in late 2002, and the following ight years ago, Vern Raburn, president Propulsion] contract. I liked this engine tech- February tapped P&WC to provide the and CEO of Albuquerque-based nology because it was a game changer. I saw PW610F — a 900-pound-thrust derivative EEclipse Aviation, made the biggest this as a really, really, really cool opportu- of the PW615F chosen to power Cessna’s gamble in light jet aviation since Bill Lear in- nity,” Raburn explained. Dr. Williams’ FJX Citation Mustang. Fuel capacity would be in- troduced the Learjet 23 in 1963. Raburn bet GAP engine evolved into the 770-pound- creased by adding small tiptanks. Eclipse also that folks would buy hundreds, if not thou- thrust EJ22 fanjet, intended to power what raised the price to nearly $1 million for ex- sands, of twin turbofan aircraft if they could would become the Eclipse 500. The isting customers. New orders were taken at be sold for less than $1 million.
    [Show full text]
  • European Air-Taxis
    EUROPEAN AIR-TAXIS An economic feasibility analysis in the use of Very Light Jets (VLJs) 0 © Durasee Services 2014 Page 0 www.durasee.com Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary.............................................................................................................. 3 2 Part 1: Introduction............................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Problem Statement ........................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Background and Context .................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Focus and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 7 2.5 Study Scope ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.6 Data Sources and Analysis ............................................................................................... 9 3 Part 2: Value Proposition and Strategy ............................................................................ 11 3.1 Innovation in Operations ................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Innovation in Service Offering ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Will Very Light Jets Replace King Air Turboprops for Business Travel?
    Applied Aviation Sciences - Prescott College of Aviation 7-2010 Will Very Light Jets Replace King Air Turboprops for Business Travel? Vince Jean-Paul Pujalte Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/pr-meteorology Part of the Business Commons, and the Management and Operations Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Pujalte, V. J. (2010). Will Very Light Jets Replace King Air Turboprops for Business Travel?. , (). Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/pr-meteorology/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Aviation at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Applied Aviation Sciences - Prescott by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILL VERY LIGHT JETS REPLACE KING AIR TURBOPROPS FOR BUSINESS TRAVEL? by Vince Jean-Paul Pujalte A Graduate Capstone Project Submitted to the Extended Campus In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Aeronautical Science Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Extended Campus Tucson Center July 2010 WILL VERY LIGHT JETS REPLACE KING AIR TURBOPROPS FOR BUSINESS TRAVEL? By Vince Jean-Paul Pujalte This Graduate Capstone Project was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s Project Review Committee Member, Mr. Nolan Davidson, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Extended Campus, and the candidate’s Project Review Committee Chair, Dr. Mary Lou Collins, Associate Professor, Extended Campus, and has been approved by the Project Review Committee. It was submitted to the Extended Campus in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Aeronautical Science.
    [Show full text]
  • View PDF Document
    Before the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Subcommittee on Aviation United States Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at Outlook for Aviation 10:00 a.m. EDT Thursday May 26, 2005 Delays in the Summer of CC-2005-043 2005 and Actions Needed To Mitigate Congestion in the Short- and Long-term Statement of The Honorable Kenneth M. Mead Inspector General U.S. Department of Transportation Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, Thank you for inviting us to testify today. As we venture into the summer months —historically the peak air travel time—congestion and delays are on the forefront of concern. In many markets, traffic and delays are back at a rate as severe as 2000, when travel disruptions were at their peak. And in some markets they are worse. Today I want to describe the scenario—what we’ve seen recently, and where we’re likely to be this summer, what is driving the delays, and what FAA must do to address congestion in both the short- and long-term. Traffic Levels Are Growing as Are the Number, Rate, and Length of Delays in Key Markets Both enplanements and operations are back to or greater than 2000 levels, when air travel was at its peak. Enplanements in 2004 were 698.7 million, just about 250,000 short of 2000 enplanements. Flight operations in April 2005 actually exceeded April 2000 operations by 4 percent. One of the factors stimulating traffic growth is the continued decline in average airfares. In April 2000, the average one-way airfare on a 1,000-mile flight was $147—this past April the fare was down 20 percent to $118.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS Ciency and Higher Speed Than Competing Models
    Honda HA-420 HondaJet Honda expects to receive certification of its $4.5 million light twin late this year. The HA-420 will have a range of 1,180 nm, a maximum speed of 420 knots, an initial climb rate of 4,000 fpm and a max- imum altitude of 43,000 feet. Honda claims the aircraft has greater fuel effi- BUSINESS ciency and higher speed than competing models. The four- to six-passenger jet will be certified for single-pilot operation. The HondaJet uses a carbon-fiber composite fuselage mated to metal wings. That, cou- pled with the unique positioning of the engines on over-the-wing pylons, reduces drag and creates a larger cabin volume JETS with generous passenger legroom and less by Mark Huber vibration. Honda expects most custom- ers to opt for a cabin configuration that Honda HA-420 HondaJet features a single-place, side-facing divan opposite the entry door followed by club- Cessna Citation M2 four seating and an aft-cabin lavatory The emerging ‘middle class’ with privacy door. Embraer Phenom 100E Key suppliers include GE Honda Aero Think less James Bond, more Cap- and inch dispatch rates even closer to Engines for the HF120 engines (2,050 tain Value. 100 percent. Development and certi- pounds of thrust each); Garmin for the New business jets under develop- fication schedules on select new pro- G3000 touchscreen avionics; and Emteq ment have one thing in common: with grams continue to fall behind because for its SkyPro HD IFE and cabin-man- a laser-like focus on value, almost to of specific financial challenges at agement system, which features audio/ the model they have achieved a near- select companies, technical difficul- Flaris LAR 01 video on demand, interactive 3-D moving MARK WAGNER perfect balance of versatility, perfor- ties integrating new technologies into map, exterior camera and wireless cabin mance, comfort and costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Index Provides the Current Revision Level/Date of Each Publication Or CD
    Eclipse Aerospace Publication Index Updated July 2021 Published By Eclipse Aerospace, Inc. 3520 Spirit Drive SE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 U.S.A. © 2021 Eclipse Aerospace, Inc. (EAI). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, displayed, modified, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the express prior written permission of the copyright holder. These commodities, technology or software were exported from the United States in accordance with the Export Administration Regulations. These commodities, technology or software are intended for use only in the End User’s country. An export license from the U.S. Department of Commerce may be required before these products can be re-exported, transferred, transshipped on a non-continuous voyage, or otherwise disposed of in any other country, either in their original form or after being incorporated into an end item. Diversion of this end-item or its use contrary to any applicable U.S. government license or to U.S. law is prohibited. Purpose The Eclipse Aerospace Publications Index provides the current revision level/date of each publication or CD. Flight Publications Current FAA Current Revision Approval Description Part Number Revision Date Date Standard Configuration Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) 06-100106 04 12/13/2007 12/13/2007 Temporary Revisions 06-100106-10 04 9/22/2008 - 06-100106-13 04 6/12/2008 - 06-100106-14 04 6/12/2008 - 06-100106-15 04 9/3/2008
    [Show full text]
  • Air Taxi at Your Service
    Air Taxi at Your Service n the past, only the rich and famous may and high technology business practices to a have had access to personal jets designed to whole new type of general aviation company. Iwhisk travelers from city to city without the Raburn met with Dr. Sam Williams, president inconvenience of crowded major airports. Now, and founder of Williams International, and however, with NASA’s support and the work of created Eclipse Aviation Corporation of Albu- several companies determined to redefine querque, New Mexico, to provide alternatives in personal air transport, flying direct to nearly air transportation. any city from the closest local airport may soon NASA and Williams were then proceeding become a viable option for everyone. with the FJX-2 turbofan engine demonstrator. COMMERCIAL BENEFITS—SPINOFFS In 1996, NASA initiated a program designed The FJX-2, the smallest commercial turbofan of to revitalize the U.S. light aircraft industry its time and weighing less than 100 pounds, through the development and commercialization achieved a thrust-to-weight ratio that would of more affordable propulsion systems, including enable the creation of a new, small, lightweight turbofan engines. Enlisted through this initia- aircraft. The turbofan power would allow this tive, known as NASA’s General Aviation new generation of aircraft to fly faster, have Propulsion (GAP) program, Glenn Research longer range, and provide more comfort, while Center conducted a small turbofan development setting new standards in general aviation safety. competition among major U.S. engine builders. The FJX-2 engine’s low noise level, light As a result, Williams International of Walled weight, low emissions, low fuel consumption, Lake, Michigan, won a cooperative research and and low cost in quantity production made it a development program with NASA, and work on perfect match for Eclipse.
    [Show full text]