COW War List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COW War List Appendix A CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF ALL WARS War Type & Year War Name Number 1816 Allied Bombardment of Algiers of 1816 Extra-State War #300 1816 Ottoman-Wahhabi Revolt of 1816-1818 Extra-State War #301 1817 Liberation of Chile of 1817-1818 Extra-State War #302 1817 First Bolivar Expedition of 1817-1819 Extra-State War #303 1817 War of Mexican Independence of 1817-1818 Extra-State War #304 1817 British-Kandyan War of 1817-1818 Extra-State War #305 1817 British-Maratha of 1817-1818 Extra-State War #306 1818 First Maori Tribal War of 1818-1824 Non-State War #1500 1818 First Caucasus War of 1818-1822 Intra-State War #500 1819 Shaka Zulu-Bantu War of 1819-1828 Non-State War #1501 1819 Burma-Assam War of 1819-1822 Non-State War #1502 1820 Buenos Aires War of 1820 Non-State War #1503 1820 Sidon-Damascus War of 1820-1821 Intra-State War #501 1820 First Two Sicilies War of 1820-1821 Intra-State War #502 1820 Ottoman Conquest of Sudan of 1820-1821 Extra-State War #307 1821 Sardinian Revolt of 1821 Intra-State War #505 1821 Greek Independence War of 1821-1828 Intra-State War #506 1821 Second Bolívar Expedition of 1821-1822 Extra-State War #308 1821 Turco-Persian War of 1821-1823 Extra-State War #309 1821 Second Maori Tribal War of 1821-1823 Non-State War #1505 1821 Siam-Kedah War of 1821 Non-State War #1506 1821 Spanish Royalists War of 1821-1823 Intra-State War #503 1823 Franco-Spanish War of 1823 Inter-State War #1 1823 First British-Burmese War of 1823-1826 Extra-State War #310 1824 First British-Ashanti War of 1824-1826 Extra-State War #311 1824 Liberation of Peru of 1824-1825 Extra-State War #312 1824 Egypt-Mehdi War of 1824 Intra-State War #507 1825 China-Kashgaria War of 1825-1828 Non-State War #1508 1825 Dutch-Javanese War of 1825-1830 Extra-State War #313 1825 Mexico-Yaqui Indian War of 1825-1827 Non-State War #1509 1825 British-Bharatpuran War of 1825-1826 Extra-State War #314 1826 Brazil-Argentine War of 1826-1828 Extra-State War #315 1826 Central American Confederation War of 1826-1829 Non-State War #1510 1826 Viang Chan-Siamese War of 1826-1827 Non-State War #1511 1826 Janissari Revolt of 1826 Intra-State War #508 1826 Russo-Persian War of 1826-1828 Extra-State War #316 1828 First Russo-Turkish War of 1828-1829 Inter-State War #4 1828 Peru-Gran Colombia War of 1828-1829 Non-State War #1512 1828 Miguelite War of 1828-1834 Intra-State War #510 1829 Argentine War for Unity of 1829-1831 Non-State War #1513 1829 Spanish Reconquest of Mexico of 1829 Extra-State War #317 1829 Sayyid Said War of 1829-1830 Non-State War #1514 1830 First Murid War of 1830-1832 Intra-State War #511 1830 First Albanian Revolt of 1830-1831 Intra-State War #512 1830 French Occupation of Algiers of 1830 Extra-State War #319 1830 First French Insurrection of 1830 Intra-State War #513 1830 Belgian Independence War of 1830 Intra-State War #515 1830 China-Kokand War of 1830-1831 Non-State War #1515 1831 Egyptian Taka Expedition of 1831-1832 Intra-State War #516 1831 First Polish War of 1831 Intra-State War #517 1831 Siam-Cambodia-Vietnam War of 1831-1834 Non-State War #1516 1831 First Syrian War of 1831-1832 Intra-State War #518 1832 First Mexican War of 1832 Intra-State War #520 1832 Ottoman-Bilmez-Asiri War of 1832-1837 Extra-State War #320 1833 Argentine-Ranqueles Indian War of 1833-1834 Non-State War #1518 1834 Egypt-Palestinian Anti-Conscription Revolt of 1834 Intra-State War #521 1834 First Carlist War of 1834-1840 Intra-State War #522 1834 Second Murid War of 1834 Intra-State War #523 1835 Cabanos Revolt of 1835-1837 Intra-State War #525 1835 Bolivia Conquest of Peru in 1835-1836 Non-State War #1520 1835 Farroupilha War of 1835-1845 Intra-State War #526 1835 Texan War of 1835-1836 Intra-State War #527 1836 First Bosnian War of 1836-1837 Intra-State War #528 1836 Third Murid War of 1836-1852 Intra-State War #530 1836 Boer-Matabele War of 1836-1837 Non-State War #1521 1837 Druze Rebellion of 1837-1838 Intra-State War #532 1837 Sabinada Rebellion of 1837-1838 Intra-State War #531 Dissolution of the Bolivia-Peru Confederation of 1837 1837-1839 Non-State War #1523 1837 Persian Siege of Herat of 1837-1838 Non-State War #1524 1838 Boer-Zulu War of 1838 Non-State War #1525 1838 First British-Zulu War of 1838 Extra-State War #321 1839 First British-Afghan War of 1839-1842 Extra-State War #322 1839 Anti-Rosas War of 1839-1840 Non-State War #1527 Dissolution of the Central American Confederation 1839 of 1839-1840 Non-State War #1528 1839 Second Syrian War Phase 1 of 1839 Intra-State War #533 1839 First Opium War of 1839-1842 Extra-State War #323 1839 First Franco-Algerian War 1839-1847 Extra-State War #324 1840 Lebanon Insurgency of 1840 Intra-State War #535 1840 First Colombian War of 1840-1842 Intra-State War #536 1840 Second Syrian War Phase 2 of 1840 Intra-State War #537 1841 First Argentina War Phase 2 of 1841-1842 Intra-State War #538 1841 Second Bosnian War of 1841 Intra-State War #540 1841 Dogra-Tibet War of 1841-1842 Non-State War #1530 1841 Triangular Revolt of 1841 Intra-State War #541 1841 Peru-Bolivian War of 1841 Extra-State War #325 1842 Karbala Revolt of 1842-1843 Intra-State War #542 1843 British-Sind War of 1843 Extra-State War #326 1843 Uruguay War of 1843-1851 Extra-State War #327 1843 Gwalior War of 1843 Extra-State War #329 1844 First Haiti-Santo Domingo War of 1844-1845 Non-State War #1531 1844 Franco-Moroccan War of 1844 Extra-State War #330 1845 First Maronite-Druze War of 1845 Intra-State War #543 1845 First British-Sikh War of 1845-1846 Extra-State War #331 1846 Cracow Revolt of 1846 Extra-State War #332 1846 First British-Xhosa War of 1846-1847 Extra-State War #333 1846 Mexican-American War of 1846-1847 Inter-State War #7 1847 Mayan Caste War Phase 1 of 1847-1848 Intra-State War #545 1847 Second Carlist War of 1847-1849 Intra-State War #546 1847 War of Seven Khojas 1847 Non-State War #1533 1848 Second Two Sicilies War of 1848-1849 Intra-State War #547 1848 First Venezuelan War of 1848-1849 Intra-State War #548 1848 Viennese Revolt of 1848 Intra-State War #550 1848 Milan Five Day Revolt of 1848 Intra-State War #551 1848 Austro-Sardinian War of 1848-1849 Inter-State War #10 First Schleswig-Holstein 1848 War of 1848-1849 Inter-State War #13 1848 First Dutch-Bali War of 1848-1849 Extra-State War #334 1848 Second British-Sikh War of 1848-1849 Extra-State War #335 1848 Second French Insurrection of 1848 Intra-State War #552 1848 Mayan Caste War Phase 2 of 1848-1855 Intra-State War #553 1848 Hungarian War of 1848-1849 Intra-State War #554 1849 War of the Roman Republic of 1849 Inter-State War #16 1849 Chinese Pirates War of 1849 Extra-State War #336 1850 Taiping Rebellion Phase 1 of 1850-1860 Non-State War #1534 1850 Second British-Xhosa War of 1850-1852 Extra-State War #337 1851 Ottoman-Yam Rebellion of 1851 Extra-State War #338 1851 La Plata War of 1851-1852 Inter-State War #19 1851 First Chilean War of 1851 Intra-State War #555 1852 Second British-Burmese War of 1852 Extra-State War #339 1852 First Tukulor War of 1852-1854 Non-State War #1535 1852 Kashmir-Dards of Chilas War of 1852 Non-State War #1536 1852 First Turco-Montenegrin War of 1852-1853 Intra-State War #556 1853 Crimean War of 1853-1856 Inter-State War #22 1853 First Peru War of 1853-1855 Intra-State War #557 1854 Han-Miao War of 1854-1860 Non-State War #1537 1854 French-Tukulor War of 1854-1857 Extra-State War #340 1855 Second Haiti-Santo Domingo War of 1855-1856 Non-State War #1538 1855 Han-Nien War of 1855-1858 Non-State War #1539 1855 British-Santal War of 1855-1856 Extra-State War #341 1855 Puebla War of 1855-1856 Intra-State War #558 1856 Hodeida Seige of 1856 Extra-State War #342 1856 Filibuster War of 1856-1857 Non-State War #1540 1856 French Conquest of Kabylia of 1856-1857 Extra-State War #345 1856 Han-Panthay War Phase 1 of 1856-1860 Non-State War #1541 1856 Second Opium War of 1856-1860 Extra-State War #343 1856 Anglo-Persian War of 1856-1857 Inter-State War #25 1856 Second Peru War of 1856-1858 Intra-State War #560 1856 First Zulu Internecine War of 1856 Non-State War #1542 1857 Indian Mutiny of 1857-1859 Extra-State War #347 1857 Kucha and Khoja Uprising of 1857 Non-State War #1543 1858 Mexican Reform War of 1858-1861 Intra-State War #561 1858 Second Turco-Montenegrin War of 1858-1859 Intra-State War #562 1858 First Boer-Basuto War of 1858 Non-State War #1544 1858 First Ethiopian War of 1858-1861 Non-State War #1545 1858 First Franco-Vietnamese War of 1858-1862 Extra-State War #349 1859 Second Venezuelan/Federalist War of 1859-1863 Intra-State War #563 1859 Netherlands-Bone War of 1859-1860 Extra-State War #350 1859 War of Italian Unification of 1859 Inter-State War #28 1859 Argentine-Buenos Aires War of 1859 Extra-State War #351 1859 First Spanish-Moroccan War of 1859-1860 Inter-State War #31 1860 Garibaldi Expedition of 1860 Extra-State War #352 1860 Second Colombian War of 1860-1861 Intra-State War #565 1860 Second Maronite-Druze War of 1860 Intra-State War #566 1860 Second Tukulor War of 1860-1862 Non-State War #1546 1860 Italian-Roman War of 1860 Inter-State War #34 1860 Neapolitan War of 1860-1861 Inter-State War #37 1860 Taiping Rebellion Phase 2 of 1860-1866 Intra-State War #567 1860 Second Nien Revolt of 1860-1868 Intra-State War #568 1860 Miao Revolt Phase 2 of 1860-1872 Intra-State War #570 1860 Panthay Rebellion Phase 2 of 1860-1872 Intra-State War #571 1861 U.S.
Recommended publications
  • A Short History of Indonesia: the Unlikely Nation?
    History Indonesia PAGES 13/2/03 8:28 AM Page i A SHORT HISTORY OF INDONESIA History Indonesia PAGES 13/2/03 8:28 AM Page ii Short History of Asia Series Series Editor: Milton Osborne Milton Osborne has had an association with the Asian region for over 40 years as an academic, public servant and independent writer. He is the author of eight books on Asian topics, including Southeast Asia: An Introductory History, first published in 1979 and now in its eighth edition, and, most recently, The Mekong: Turbulent Past, Uncertain Future, published in 2000. History Indonesia PAGES 13/2/03 8:28 AM Page iii A SHORT HISTORY OF INDONESIA THE UNLIKELY NATION? Colin Brown History Indonesia PAGES 13/2/03 8:28 AM Page iv First published in 2003 Copyright © Colin Brown 2003 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. The Australian Copyright Act 1968 (the Act) allows a maximum of one chapter or 10 per cent of this book, whichever is the greater, to be photocopied by any educational institution for its educational purposes provided that the educational institution (or body that administers it) has given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act. Allen & Unwin 83 Alexander Street Crows Nest NSW 2065 Australia Phone: (61 2) 8425 0100 Fax: (61 2) 9906 2218 Email: [email protected] Web: www.allenandunwin.com National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Brown, Colin, A short history of Indonesia : the unlikely nation? Bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Simón Bolívar
    Reading Comprehension/Biography SIMÓN BOLÍVAR Simón José Antonio de la Santísima Trinidad Bolívar y Palacios, (July 24, 1783 – December 17, 1830), more commonly known as Símon Bolívar, was one of the most important leaders of Spanish America's successful struggle for independence from Spain. He is a very important figure in South American political history, and served as President of Gran Colombia from 1821 to 1830, President of Peru from 1824 to 1826, and President of Bolivia from 1825 to 1826. Bolívar was born into a wealthy family in Caracas, in what is now Venezuela. Much of his family’s wealth came from silver, gold and copper mines. Later in his revolutionary life, Bolívar used part of the mineral income to finance the South American revolutionary wars. After the death of his parents, he went to Spain in 1799 to complete his education. He married there in 1802, but his wife died of yellow fever on a short return visit to Venezuela in 1803. Bolívar returned to Europe in 1804 and for a time was part of Napoleon's retinue. Bolívar returned to Venezuela in 1807, and, when Napoleon made Joseph Bonaparte King of Spain and its colonies in 1808, he participated in the resistance juntas in South America. The Caracas junta declared its independence in 1810, and Bolívar was sent to Britain on a diplomatic mission. Bolívar returned to Venezuela in 1811. In March 1812, he left Venezuela after an earthquake destroyed Caracas. In July 1812, junta leader Francisco de Miranda surrendered to the Spanish, and Bolívar had to flee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundations of US Air Doctrine
    DISCLAIMER This study represents the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Air University Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education (CADRE) or the Department of the Air Force. This manuscript has been reviewed and cleared for public release by security and policy review authorities. iii Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Watts, Barry D. The Foundations ofUS Air Doctrine . "December 1984 ." Bibliography : p. Includes index. 1. United States. Air Force. 2. Aeronautics, Military-United States. 3. Air warfare . I. Title. 11. Title: Foundations of US air doctrine . III. Title: Friction in war. UG633.W34 1984 358.4'00973 84-72550 355' .0215-dc 19 ISBN 1-58566-007-8 First Printing December 1984 Second Printing September 1991 ThirdPrinting July 1993 Fourth Printing May 1996 Fifth Printing January 1997 Sixth Printing June 1998 Seventh Printing July 2000 Eighth Printing June 2001 Ninth Printing September 2001 iv THE AUTHOR s Lieutenant Colonel Barry D. Watts (MA philosophy, University of Pittsburgh; BA mathematics, US Air Force Academy) has been teaching and writing about military theory since he joined the Air Force Academy faculty in 1974 . During the Vietnam War he saw combat with the 8th Tactical Fighter Wing at Ubon, Thailand, completing 100 missions over North Vietnam in June 1968. Subsequently, Lieutenant Colonel Watts flew F-4s from Yokota AB, Japan, and Kadena AB, Okinawa. More recently, he has served as a military assistant to the Director of Net Assessment, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and with the Air Staff's Project CHECKMATE.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms and Empirical Effects
    INTERSTATE PEACEKEEPING: CAUSAL MECHANISMS AND EMPIRICAL EFFECTS Virginia Page Fortna* Department of Political Science & Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies Columbia University permanent address 420 W. 118th Street New York NY 10027 w. 212 854-0021 h. 212 662-5395 f. 212 864-1686 AY 2004-2005 address Hoover Institution Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 w. 650 723-0746 c. 503 548-7429 f. 650 723-1687 email: [email protected] Version: September 14, 2004 * The author owes debts of gratitude to more people than can be listed here for help and feedback with the project of which this paper is a part. She thanks in particular, Nisha Fazal, Hein Goemans, Lise Howard, Bob Jervis, Bob Keohane, Lisa Martin, Jack Snyder, Alan Stam, Barb Walter, and Suzanne Werner. This research was made possible by grants from the Center for International Security and Cooperation at Stanford, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. INTERSTATE PEACEKEEPING: CAUSAL MECHANISMS AND EMPIRICAL EFFECTS ABSTRACT Peacekeeping is perhaps the international community’s most important tool for maintaining peace in the aftermath of war. Its practice has evolved significantly in the past ten or fifteen years as it has been used increasingly in civil wars. However, traditional peacekeeping between states is not well understood. Its operation is under-theorized and its effects under-tested. This article explores the causal mechanisms through which peacekeepers keep peace, and examines its empirical effects after interstate wars. To take the endogeneity of peacekeeping into account, it also examines where peacekeepers tend to be deployed.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Arts Department Of
    FACULTY OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE IMPACT OF COLONIAL TAXATION SYSTEM IN CHIRUMANZU DISTRICT FROM 1900- 1980. BY MICHAEL F.T MAGWARADA R136368P A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ARTS IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BACHELOR OF ARTS (HONOURS) DEGREE IN HISTORY. MAY 2017 1 Declaration I, MICHAEL F.T MAGWARADA hereby declare that this research is my own work except where sources have been acknowledged. The work has never been submitted, nor will it ever be submitted to another University for the awarding of a degree. Signed…………………………………………………………… MICHAEL F.T MAGWARADA Date……………………………………………………………… Supervisor………………………………………………………. DR J. CHAKAWA 1 Copyright All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means for scholarly purposes without prior written permission of the author or of Midlands State University on behalf of the author. ©Michael F.T Magwarada B.A (HONS) History Midlands State University, Zimbabwe, 2017 2 Acknowledgements The positive outcome of this dissertation would not have been consummated without the persistent support of fellow colleagues. Throughout my entire period of completing this work, I would like to express my gratitude and deep appreciation to the following people who gave me a shoulder to lean on. Mr A. Zevure mentor, brother, friend, a figure which many words can best describe his unwavering support for his academic wisdom, encouragement to my studies, strength and faith which gave me a new appreciation of the meaning and importance of education. His suggestions planted the seed of good natured forbearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of Panglima Laot in Aceh: from Punggawa to Customary Institution
    E3S Web of Conferences 202, 07031 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020207031 ICENIS 2020 Transformation of Panglima Laot in Aceh: From Punggawa to Customary Institution Mahendra Pudji Utama*, Yety Rochwulaningsih, Singgih Tri Sulistiyono, and Mujiburrahman Departement of History, Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia. Abstract. This paper discusses how Panglima Laot transformed into the republic from kingdom era. During the kingdom era, Panglima Laot had an important role in the maritime sector, particularly in collecting vessel excise. However, during the Dutch Colonial military penetration, Panglima Laot had adapted to the war situation. After the independence, it adapted to the different situation where kingdoms were no longer exist. This political change transformed Panglima Laot in terms of function, value and position as a form of adaptation. This study uses historical method, especially analyzing local as well as the colonial sources. It also included journal as the reference. This study shows that Panglima Laot gradually transformed based on certain phase. During the war phase, Panglima Laot transformed into the war force to face the Dutch military penetration. After the independence, Panglima Laot had to adapt once again, it transforms into a customary institution serving for the fishermen within the traditional corridor. Panglima Laot eventually becomes the maritime culture of the Kingdom of Aceh for Indonesia. The existence of Panglima Laot as a customary institution managing the coastal area is recognized by the Country in the law. Keywords: Panglima Laot; Transformation; Kingdom of Aceh; Indonesian Republic. 1 Introduction As a maritime country, Indonesia has a long history and diverse maritime cultural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Nostalgia: Victorian Values, History and Teenage Fiction in Britain
    RONALD PAUL Imperial Nostalgia: Victorian Values, History and Teenage Fiction in Britain In his pamphlet, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, on the seizure of French government power in 1851 by Napoleon’s grandson, Louis, Karl Marx makes the following famous comment about the way in which political leaders often dress up their own ideological motives and actions in the guise of the past in order to give them greater historical legitimacy: The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living. And just when they seem engaged in revolutionizing themselves and things, in creating something that has never yet existed, precisely in such periods of revolutionary crisis they anxiously conjure up the spirits of the past to their service and borrow from them names, bat- tle-cries, and costumes in order to present the new scene of world history in this time-honoured disguise and this borrowed language.1 One historically contentious term that has been recycled in recent years in the public debate in Britain is that of “Victorian values”. For most of the 20th century, the word “Victorian” was associated with negative connotations of hypercritical morality, brutal industrial exploitation and colonial oppression. However, it was Mrs Thatcher who first gave the word a more positive political spin in the 1980s with her unabashed celebration of Victorian laissez-faire capitalism and patriotic fervour. This piece of historical obfuscation was aimed at disguising the grim reality of her neoliberal policies of economic privatisation, anti-trade union legislation, cut backs in the so-called “Nanny” Welfare State and the gunboat diplomacy of the Falklands War.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the British Invasion of Egypt (1882) Through the Lens of Victorian Party Politics
    Tarih Dergisi, Sayı 69 (2019/1), İstanbul 2019, s. 113-134 AN ANALYSIS OF THE BRITISH INVASION OF EGYPT (1882) THROUGH THE LENS OF VICTORIAN PARTY POLITICS Begüm Yıldızeli Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü, Bilecik, Türkiye Abstract The British occupation of Egypt in 1882 meant a breakaway from the Anglo-French entente’s control over Ottoman financial system and the end of the Liberal Government’s ‘reluctant’ imperialism. When the Liberal ministry began in 1880, the cabinet immediately focused on foreign policies towards the Ottoman Empire subsequent to Gladstone’s campaign during the Bulgarian Agitation which had already turned out to be a party question. The protection of the Suez Canal as well as the interests of the British bondholders and the prestige of the British Empire was vital, which united the Liberal ministry and the Conservatives under the same purpose. Despite late Ottoman approval, the occupation signified the edge of Anglo-Ottoman alliance during the nineteenth century. This study will analyse why the Egyptian question is important for British party politics and to what extend the Anglo-Ottoman relations was affected with these circumstances. Keywords: Suez Canal, British Party Politics, Egypt, Urabi Pasha Öz VİKTORYA DÖNEMİ PARTİ SİYASETİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN İNGİLİZLER’İN MISIR’I İŞGALİ (1882) ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ 1882 yılında İngilizler ’in Mısır’ı işgali gerek İngiliz Hükümeti’nin ‘gönülsüz’ emperyaliz- minin gerekse de Osmanlı ekonomisindeki
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia's Security Practice in Relation to Conflicts in Southern
    LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Malaysia’s Security Practice in Relation to Conflicts in Southern Thailand, Aceh and the Moro Region: The Ethnic Dimension Jafri Abdul Jalil A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations 2008 UMI Number: U615917 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615917 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Libra British U to 'v o> F-o in andEconor- I I ^ C - 5 3 AUTHOR DECLARATION I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Jafri Abdul Jalil The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted provided that full acknowledgment is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without prior consent of the author. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare in a Fragile World: Military Impact on the Human Environment
    Recent Slprt•• books World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbook 1979 World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbooks 1968-1979, Cumulative Index Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Weapon Proliferation Other related •• 8lprt books Ecological Consequences of the Second Ihdochina War Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Environment Publish~d on behalf of SIPRI by Taylor & Francis Ltd 10-14 Macklin Street London WC2B 5NF Distributed in the USA by Crane, Russak & Company Inc 3 East 44th Street New York NY 10017 USA and in Scandinavia by Almqvist & WikseH International PO Box 62 S-101 20 Stockholm Sweden For a complete list of SIPRI publications write to SIPRI Sveavagen 166 , S-113 46 Stockholm Sweden Stoekholol International Peace Research Institute Warfare in a Fragile World Military Impact onthe Human Environment Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI is an independent institute for research into problems of peace and conflict, especially those of disarmament and arms regulation. It was established in 1966 to commemorate Sweden's 150 years of unbroken peace. The Institute is financed by the Swedish Parliament. The staff, the Governing Board and the Scientific Council are international. As a consultative body, the Scientific Council is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. Governing Board Dr Rolf Bjornerstedt, Chairman (Sweden) Professor Robert Neild, Vice-Chairman (United Kingdom) Mr Tim Greve (Norway) Academician Ivan M£ilek (Czechoslovakia) Professor Leo Mates (Yugoslavia) Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 31 Notes: Societies at Crossroads
    Chapter 31 Notes: Societies at Crossroads Chapter Outline I. Introduction: Ottoman empire, Russia, China, and Japan A. Common problems 1. Military weakness, vulnerability to foreign threats 2. Internal weakness due to economic problems, financial difficulties, and corruption B. Reform efforts 1. Attempts at political and educational reform and at industrialization 2. Turned to western models C. Different results of reforms 1. Ottoman empire, Russia, and China unsuccessful; societies on the verge of collapse 2. Reform in Japan was more thorough; Japan emerged as an industrial power II. The Ottoman empire in decline A. The nature of decline 1. Military decline since the late seventeenth century a. Ottoman forces behind European armies in strategy, tactics, weaponry, training b. Janissary corps politically corrupt, undisciplined c. Provincial governors gained power, private armies 2. Extensive territorial losses in nineteenth century a. Lost Caucasus and central Asia to Russia; western frontiers to Austria; Balkan provinces to Greece and Serbia b. Egypt gained autonomy after Napoleon's failed campaign in 1798 (a) Egyptian general Muhammad Ali built a powerful, modern army (b) Ali's army threatened Ottomans, made Egypt an autonomous province 3. Economic difficulties began in seventeenth century a. Less trade through empire as Europeans shifted to the Atlantic Ocean basin b. Exported raw materials, imported European manufactured goods c. Heavily depended on foreign loans, half of the revenues paid to loan interest d. Foreigners began to administer the debts of the Ottoman state by 1882 4. The "capitulations": European domination of Ottoman economy a. Extraterritoriality: Europeans exempt from Ottoman law within the empire b.
    [Show full text]
  • War As a Constitutive Moment
    Dodging a Bullet: Democracy’s Gains in Modern War* Paul Starr That war drives state-building is virtually a truism of historical sociology, summed up in the late Charles Tilly’s well-known aphorism that states make war, and war makes states. (Tilly, 1990) But if war and state-building merely reinforce each other, why have liberal democracies flourished and proliferated during the past two centuries when war reached unprecedented dimensions? Why not militaristic autocracies? What role, if any, has war played in the formation and spread of liberal democratic regimes? To raise these questions is not to suggest that war is one of democracy’s primary causes, but rather to ask how democracy and, more particularly, liberal democracy dodged a bullet--a bullet that, according to many ancient and plausible theories, might well been fatal. The belief that democracy is a liability in war has been a staple of political thought, beginning with Thucydides. If liberalism and democracy had been sources of severe military disadvantage during the past two centuries, liberal democratic regimes should have perished in wars as they were conquered and eliminated by other states, or when their own populations rose up to overthrow them in the wake of defeat, or because they were forced to abandon their institutions in order to survive. That this was not their fate suggests a range of possibilities. At a minimum, their institutions have not been a disabling handicap in war, and no consistent relationship may exist between war and democracy. Alternatively, war may have contributed to the spread of democratic regimes if democracy itself or features correlated with democracy have increased the chances of a regime’s survival in war, or if war has promoted changes favorable to democratic institutions.
    [Show full text]