DOCSLIB.ORG

Tetragonula Carbonaria and Disease: Behavioural and Antimicrobial Defences Used by Colonies to Limit Brood Pathogens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tetragonula Carbonaria and Disease: Behavioural and Antimicrobial Defences Used by Colonies to Limit Brood Pathogens Tetragonula carbonaria and disease: Behavioural and antimicrobial defences used by colonies to limit brood pathogens Jenny Lee Shanks BHort, BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Submitted to the School of Science and Health Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus 2015 Our treasure lies in the beehive of our knowledge. We are perpetually on the way thither, being by nature winged insects and honey gatherers of the mind. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 – 1900) i Statement of Authentication The work presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, original except as acknowledged in the text. I hereby declare that I have not submitted this material, whether in full or in part, for a degree at this or any other institution ……………………………………………………………………. Jenny Shanks July 2015 ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I am extremely indebted to my supervisors, Associate Professor Robert Spooner-Hart, Dr Tony Haigh and Associate Professor Markus Riegler. Their guidance, support and encouragement throughout this entire journey, has provided me with many wonderful and unique opportunities to learn and develop as a person and a researcher. I thank you all for having an open door, lending an ear, and having a stack of tissues handy. I am truly grateful and appreciate Roberts’s time and commitment into my thesis and me. I am privileged I had the opportunity to work alongside someone with a wealth of knowledge and experience. Robert’s passion and enthusiasm has created some lasting memories, and certainly has encouraged me to continue pursuing my own desires. I cannot begin to express my gratitude for the time and patience provided from Tony not only during our statistical meetings, but also from his continual advice about my writing. It certainly has been a learning curve. I would also like to thank Markus for providing me the opportunity to dabble in insect molecular biology. The boundless knowledge from Markus has played an important role in the success of the disease identification. I would like to acknowledge with gratitude the UWS Hawkesbury Foundation, for granting me the F.G. Swain Award, which supported key aspects of this project. The School of Science and Health “3 Minute Thesis Competition” award prizes helped fund numerous aspects of my project. I am also grateful for receiving the University of Western Sydney Postgraduate Award and the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment top-up scholarships. I have had the privilege of meeting many people who were willing to share their time, knowledge and skills. I thank Dr Tim Heard (CSIRO, QLD), and Russell Zabel for the supply of stingless bee hives, and especially Tim for his endless stingless bee knowledge. Many of the Australian stingless beekeepers, I thank, for their help, guidance and support of my work, and for happily supplying bees in the name of iii science. Personally, I would like to acknowledge Dr Rute Brito and Dr Flavio de Oliveira Francisco for their friendship and welcoming me to Brazil as I attended the 10th Bee Meeting (Ribeirão Preto). I would also like to extend a thank you to the Australian Entomology Society, for providing me the opportunities to attend the annual conferences and to meet so many wonderful and interesting entomologists. These experiences have truly opened by my eyes to the world of entomology. I would like to extend my sincere gratefulness to Don Brushett (Southern Cross University), for his assistance in the chemical compound identification aspect of my project. I appreciate his time and patience. I am thankful for the technical support provided by UWS staff Jennie Nelson, Linda Westmoreland, Rosemary Freeman and Sumedha Dharmaratne, and also our apiarist Michael Duncan for his assistance and input in the meliponary and apiary aspects. To my other unofficial supervisors, your presence in my university, and PhD life has made a world of difference, I am truly thankful for your support and friendship; Professor Andrew Beattie, Professor Barry McGlasson, Assoc. Professor Paul Holford, Dr Albert Basta, and Dr Paul Milham. Sincere thanks goes to past and present PhD students, I cannot think of getting through a PhD without another great bunch of people; Dr Jocelyn King, Dr Megan Halcroft, Dr Sahar VanDyk, Dr Hang Dao, Namgay Om, Alison Hewitt, and Phuong Sa. The lunch breaks, numerous cake-days, sharing the tears and triumphs over our projects; I will always cherish the laughter and our friendship. Dr Duong Nguyen, Dr Jennifer Morrow, Dr Shannon Smith, Aidan Hall, Andrew Gherlenda, Tim Sutton and Peter Kern, thanks for the experiences. Finally, I cannot finish without thanking the loved ones in my life for their patience, support, and encouragement. To my parents Stephan and Kerry, and my sister Lee, thank you for your love and support throughout this entire adventure, and for allowing the ever-growing number of “girls” in the backyard, we all have developed a soft spot for them. A special mention to the four-legged family members; thanks for being the ears without the voice, the warm tissue, and the much-needed distraction. To my other dear family and friends, thank you for your continual support of the “bee girl”. What a journey. We made it. iv Preface I have presented this thesis as a series of four experimental chapters in a traditional dissertation format. This thesis includes an introductory chapter, including literature review and aims and scope sections (Chapter 1). The thesis finishes with a concluding chapter (Chapter 6) that discusses key findings, their significance and applications, and outlines prospects for future research. The study was conceptualised by myself and the supervisory panel, Assoc. Prof Robert Spooner- Hart (Principal), Dr Tony Haigh, and Assoc. Prof Markus Riegler. The supervisory panel and I discussed and decided the aims, hypotheses, and experimental design of the chapters. I have undertaken the experimental work; analysed the data; and written the chapters, with input and feedback by the supervisory panel, and external persons where acknowledged in text. The structure of this thesis is given below. Any supplementary tables and figures of each chapter were presented in Appendices, as detailed below: Chapter 1: Introductory chapter Chapter 2: Hive management and investigations into nest thermoregulation. Supplementary video is provided in Appendix 1 Chapter 3: Hygienic behaviour expression in Tetragonula carbonaria. Supplementary videos, tables, and figures are provided in Appendix 2 Chapter 4: Suppression of insect pathogens by the antimicrobial activity of stingless bee nest products. Supplementary tables and figures are provided in Appendix 3 Chapter 5: First documented brood pathogen in a stingless bee species, Tetragonula carbonaria. Supplementary tables and figures are provided in Appendix 4 Chapter 6: Thesis Discussion v Table of Contents Statement of authentication ……………………………………………… ii Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………….. iii Preface ………………………………………………………………….….. v Table of Contents …………………………………………………………. vi List of Tables ……………………………………………………………… x List of Figures ………………………………………………………….….. xi List of Videos ………...……………………………………………………. xv List of Appendices ………………………………………………………… xvi List of Tables in Appendices ……………………………………………... xvi List of Figures in Appendices ………………………………………….…. xvii Abbreviations ……………………………………………………………... xix Glossary …………………………………………………………………… xx Species referred to in this thesis …………………………………………. xxii Thesis Summary …………………………………………………………... xxiv Manuscripts prepared for submission …………………………………... xxviii Chapter 1 Literature review, scope and aims of thesis 1 1.1 Introduction ………………………………………………………….… 2 1.2 European honey bee compared to stingless bees ………………………. 3 1.2.1 Historical perspective ……………………………………………… 3 1.2.2 Nest architecture …………………………………………………... 4 1.2.3 Biology and social life …………………………………………..… 7 1.3 Apis mellifera pests and pathogens …………………………………..… 9 1.3.1 Paenibacillus larvae – American foulbrood ………………………. 10 1.3.2 Ascosphaera apis – Chalkbrood …………………………………... 12 1.4 Stingless bee pest and pathogens ………………………………………. 13 1.5 Mechanisms for suppression of brood pathogens in eusocial bees ….… 15 1.5.1 Colony behaviours ………………………………………………… 15 1.5.2 Nest products and their antimicrobial activities …………………… 20 1.5.3 Role of microbial symbionts in the digestive system ……………... 23 1.6 Research scope and aims ………………………………………….…… 24 vi Chapter 2 Hive management and investigations of nest thermoregulation 27 2.1 Abstract 28 2.2 Management of T. carbonaria hives …………………………………… 28 2.2.1 Bee shed set-up ……………………………………………………. 28 2.2.2 Field set-up ………………………………………………………… 31 2.2.3 Hive supplementary feeding ………………………………………. 32 2.2.4 Colony propagation ……………………………………………….. 33 2.3 Nest temperature and thermoregulation activity within T. carbonaria colonies ………………………………………………………………... 34 2.3.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 34 2.3.2 Methods and materials ………………………………………….…. 37 2.3.3 Results ……………………………………………………………... 38 2.3.4 Discussion …………………………………………………………. 51 Chapter 3 Hygienic behaviour in Tetragonula carbonaria 56 3.1 Abstract ………………………………………………………………… 57 3.2 Introduction ……………………………………………………………. 57 3.3 Materials and methods …………………………………………………. 62 3.3.1Observing normal behaviour …………………………………….… 62 3.3.2 Development of methodology for assessment of hygienic behaviour ……………………………………………………………… 63 3.3.3 General hygienic behaviour ……………………………………..… 67 3.4 Results ………………………………………………….……………… 70 3.4.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tetragonula Carbonaria and Disease: Behavioural and Antimicrobial Defences Used by Colonies to Limit Brood Pathogens
    Tetragonula carbonaria and disease: Behavioural and antimicrobial defences used by colonies to limit brood pathogens Jenny Lee Shanks BHort, BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Submitted to the School of Science and Health University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus July, 2015 Our treasure lies in the beehive of our knowledge. We are perpetually on the way thither, being by nature winged insects and honey gatherers of the mind. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 – 1900) i Statement of Authentication The work presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, original except as acknowledged in the text. I hereby declare that I have not submitted this material, whether in full or in part, for a degree at this or any other institution ……………………………………………………………………. Jenny Shanks July 2015 ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I am extremely indebted to my supervisors, Associate Professor Robert Spooner-Hart, Dr Tony Haigh and Associate Professor Markus Riegler. Their guidance, support and encouragement throughout this entire journey, has provided me with many wonderful and unique opportunities to learn and develop as a person and a researcher. I thank you all for having an open door, lending an ear, and having a stack of tissues handy. I am truly grateful and appreciate Roberts’s time and commitment into my thesis and me. I am privileged I had the opportunity to work alongside someone with a wealth of knowledge and experience. Robert’s passion and enthusiasm has created some lasting memories, and certainly has encouraged me to continue pursuing my own desires.
    [Show full text]
  • Stingless Bee Propagation
    23/08/2018 Stingless Bee Propagation NATURAL PROPAGATION Stingless bees do not swarm the same as honey bees. Instead they set up a new nest site, stock it with food and then move in. Can take weeks, months, or years! So we need artificial propagation techniques Australian Native Bee Book, pg110 Tetragonula carbonaria Austroplebeia australis Tetragonula hockingsi Austroplebeia cassiae Tetragonula davenporti Austroplebeia essingtoni Tetragonula mellipies Austroplebeia magna Tetragonula sapiens Tetragonula clypearis Austroplebeia cincta 2 years and waiting for a queen (Green species also found in PNG or S.E. Asia) A.australis Bees in S.E. QLD My mentors T.hockingsi Robert Luttrell > 10,000 workers More than 300 hives Coastal QLD Commercial sales Brisbane to Cape York Educator Vigorous Inventor Trouble makers A.australis Allan Beil Small or large colonies (talking to Nick Powell) Drier Inland areas More than 300 hives Found in most states A.australis Can handle droughts Shy Naturalist Very gentle Dr Tim Heard T.carbonaria More than 300 hives 10,000 workers Author / Educator Coastal Bundaberg to Bega Commercial sales Vigorous Researcher Less troublesome than hockingsi 1 23/08/2018 Boxes / Pests / Heat / Cold > Need a better box than Apis. Sealed against pests and thick enough to insulate from heat and cold > Hard to transfer. Want a box to resist weather, to last 20 years plus • Syrphid fly (left) • Phorid fly (below) 1. Splitting or Division • Divides a colony into 2 equal parts every 12 to 18 months • Each box gets half the provisions and half the brood • There are always queen cells and virgin queens • Split when the hive contents are > 3kg (net) and the weather is kind • Tim Heard is an early user of this technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Innate Colour Preferences of the Australian Native Stingless Bee Tetragonula Carbonaria Sm
    $ $ ! $ $" # ! "# $ %&'(')'*''' 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy J Comp Physiol A DOI 10.1007/s00359-016-1101-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Innate colour preferences of the Australian native stingless bee Tetragonula carbonaria Sm. Adrian G. Dyer1,2 · Skye Boyd-Gerny3 · Mani Shrestha1,4 · Klaus Lunau5 · Jair E. Garcia1 · Sebastian Koethe5 · Bob B. M. Wong3 Received: 14 March 2016 / Revised: 1 June 2016 / Accepted: 1 June 2016 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract Innate preferences promote the capacity of pol- vision and a hexagon colour space revealed a difference linators to find flowers. Honeybees and bumblebees have between test colonies, and a significant effect of green con- strong preferences for ‘blue’ stimuli, and flowers of this trast and an interaction effect of green contrast with spec- colour typically present higher nectar rewards. Interest- tral purity on bee choices. We also observed colour prefer- ingly, flowers from multiple different locations around the ences for stimuli from the blue and blue–green categorical world independently have the same distribution in bee col- regions of colour space.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarence Native Bees – Care Fact 1
    CLARENCE NATIVE BEES – CARE FACT 1 THE QUICK FACTS ON NATIVE BEES In Australia 2,000 species of native bees have been identified. On the North Coast we have about 12 species which include both the social and solitary bees which include both the social and solitary bees. Of these, there are three genera of social native bees - Tetragonula carbonaria, Austroplebia australis and Tetragonula hockingsii. These native bees are very hard to tell apart by any observer. The only easy way to identify them is through their differing nest architecture as shown in the photos below. All three species produce honey, however there are some significant differences in their nesting and foraging behaviour. A hive of Tetragonula carbonaria can contain between 1,000 to 10,000 native bees and these can be readily observed flying about. Austroplebia nests are much more fragile and they spread unevenly in loose piles. Unlike the intact tight spiral formation of the Tetragonula carbonaria hive. Austroplebia australis are also known to have relatively small hives of around 50 to 100 bees. These bees are probably the most vulnerable as their nests are usually located in dead trees and situated at a high level where they are not readily observed. Tetragonula hockingsii are most commonly found throughout the east coast of Queensland to the border of NSW where the climatic conditions are more suitable to their breeding. This species is not discussed in much detail here. (Left to Right) : Hive structures - Tetragonula carbonaria, Austroplebia Australis and Tetragonula hockingsii (Photos : John Klumpp) CLARENCE NATIVE BEES – CARE FACT 1 Native social stingless bees are honey producers and in most cases, one hive can produce a small amount of honey each year (sometimes up to 1kg).
    [Show full text]
  • Bees at War: Interspecific Battles and Nest Usurpation in Stingless Bees
    The University of Chicago Bees at War: Interspecific Battles and Nest Usurpation in Stingless Bees. Author(s): John Paul Cunningham, James P. Hereward, Tim A. Heard, Paul J. De Barro, and Stuart A. West Source: The American Naturalist, Vol. 184, No. 6 (December 2014), pp. 777-786 Published by: The University of Chicago Press for The American Society of Naturalists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/678399 . Accessed: 07/10/2015 00:46 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press, The American Society of Naturalists, The University of Chicago are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Naturalist. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 23.235.32.0 on Wed, 7 Oct 2015 00:46:53 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions vol. 184, no. 6 the american naturalist december 2014 Natural History Note Bees at War: Interspecific Battles and Nest Usurpation in Stingless Bees John Paul Cunningham,1,* James P. Hereward,2 Tim A. Heard,3 Paul J. De Barro,3 and Stuart A. West4 1. Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Small Hive Beetle 2 the Small Hive Beetle INTRODUCTION 3
    An invasive pest on honey bees The Small Hive Beetle 2 The Small Hive Beetle INTRODUCTION 3 3 INTRODUCTION Honey bees – Honey bees – small insects bring big benefits 5 The Small Hive Beetle – small insects an invasive pest from Africa bring big benefits 10 BIOLOGY 14 Diagnosis: eggs – larvae – pupae – adult beetles As honey bees are important pollinators of many crops, they contribute to securing our food supply. Up to eight percent of 18 INFESTATION global crop yields depend on the support of bees and other pollinating insects, 24 A THREAT TO BEEKEEPING and as such, healthy pollinators are a vital element of sustainable farming. As a 30 CONTROLLING THE partner in pollinator protection, Bayer is SMALL HIVE BEETLE committed to the well-being of honey bees, 34 Treatment methods for infested bee colonies wild bees, other pollinators and biodiversity in general, while helping farmers to 38 OUTLOOK optimize their agricultural productivity. Research and prevention – measures going forward Over the last 60 years, the number of managed honey bee colonies has risen 43 IMPRINT worldwide by 65 percent, but the health challenges facing these colonies in several regions of the world have been a cause for considerable concern. The contributory factors include various pests and diseases, among them the Small Hive Beetle (Aethina tumida), which has spread from its original geographic range in sub-Saharan Africa to many regions of the world in recent years. Þ 1 If an article or image is marked with this sign, you can download it via the following link: www.beecare.bayer.com/SHB We hope this material will prove useful for your Small Hive Beetle training courses.
    [Show full text]
  • How Stingless Bees Are Able to Make Tall Spiral Nests 29 July 2020, by Bob Yirka
    How stingless bees are able to make tall spiral nests 29 July 2020, by Bob Yirka not just architecturally impressive, but were mesmerizing in their beauty. At the time, scientists had no explanation for how such a simple creature could create such magnificent structures out of nothing but wax. A closer look showed that the bees created their cells in hexagonal shapes then added regurgitated food, and then the queen deposited a single egg in the cell. The researchers with this new effort were at the time studying similar patterns in crystals and in mother-of-pearl created by mollusks. After finding that such patterns could be created by applying a very simple algorithm, the researchers turned their attention to the bees in Australia. To find out if the bees were using a similar algorithm, the researchers modeled their attributes and behaviors on a computer to create a simulation of their nest-building behavior. In so doing, they Combs of two species of the stingless bee Tetragonula discovered that the bees could very easily create showing structures of (a) target patterns (Tetragonula spiral structures by following two very simple rules. carbonaria), (b) spirals (Tetragonula carbonaria), (c) When it was time to build a new cell, they could add double spirals (Tetragonula carbonaria) and (d) more disordered terraces (Tetragonula hockingsi). Images a cell to the growth front, which was the edge of the courtesy of (a) Elke Haege; (b–d) Tim Heard. Credit: comb under construction—but it had to be placed Journal of The Royal Society Interface (2020). DOI: slightly higher than its neighbors—or they could build 10.1098/rsif.2020.0187 a new cell on top of another cell, provided it was level in comparison with the other cells in the nest.
    [Show full text]
  • Austroplebeia Cincta
    ARTICLE TWENTY THREE AUSTROPLEBEIA CINCTA: Article 23 February 2013 DRAMATIC FIRST PHOTOS OF THE QUEEN by Dr Anne Dollin Australian Native Bee Research Centre February 2013 T the centre of a stingless bee nest is the brood, where the workers build and provision miniature waxen cells, the queen lays her eggs and the immature bees are raised. Amongst the stingless bees worldwide, many different types Aof fascinating behaviours can be seen, if you take the time to observe these tiny bees in action. Above: an Austroplebeia cincta queen bee attended by her workers. All photos in this article are by Anne Dollin. Here we report for the first time, the queen’s egg laying behaviour in a new Australian stingless bee species, Austroplebeia cincta. PROMOTING THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF AUSTRALIAN NATIVE BEES © Australian Native Bee Research Centre, PO Box 74, North Richmond NSW 2754 Australia Aussie Bee Website: www.aussiebee.com.au Page 1 In Australia the egg laying behaviour of our Tetragonula* stingless bees is completely different to that of our Austroplebeia species. In our Australian Tetragonula carbonaria species, for example, worker bees build up to 90 brood cells all at the same time. When they are all fully Article 23 constructed the queen comes and, within 10 to 15 minutes, she lays eggs in February 2013 all the new cells in the whole batch. (See ANBRC Booklet 3: Behaviour of Australian Stingless Bees for more details.) In contrast, in Austroplebeia cincta, we have observed that the process of egg laying is quite different. The brood cells are constructed individually.
    [Show full text]
  • Stingless Bee Pests and Diseases
    13/09/2018 STINGLESS BEE PESTS AND DISEASES ROBERT SPOONER-HART, MEGAN HALCROFT AND JENNY SHANKS WITHIN COLONY PARASITES OF STINGLESS BEES IN AUSTRALIA • native hive syrphid fly • native hive phorid fly • introduced small hive beetle • native hive/pollen beetles • mites • soldier fly 1 13/09/2018 HIVE SYRPHID FLY Ceriana ornata • Common in stingless hives being manipulated, esp. during splitting for propagation. Adults attracted to hive stores • Will also enter weak or dead hives • Lay eggs on hive structures, or in hive external cracks/joins after hive splitting, honey removal spiracles • Larvae hatch from eggs burrow through gaps in propolis • Maggot-like, 2 posterior spiracles • Feed on hive stores, gradually destroying hives, slime out in severe cases • Pre-pupal larvae leave hive to pupate in soil , or pupate in hive Pre-pupal stage Larvae in stingless bee hive structures 2 13/09/2018 spiracles • Larvae hatch from eggs burrow through gaps in propolis • Maggot-like, 2 large posterior spiracles • Feed on hive stores, gradually destroying hives, slime out in severe cases • Pre-pupal larvae leave hive to pupate in soil , or pupate in hive Pre-pupal stage Larvae in stingless bee hive structures Syrphids pupating in stingless bee box Management: Protect against infestation by taping up hive cracks/seams after splitting or opening 3 13/09/2018 HIVE PHORID FLY Dohrniphora trigoniae • Hump-backed small flies, run rather than fly when disturbed • Enter hives through the entrance esp. if weak hives, or during hive manipulation • Larvae small, maggot-like, feed on stores. Pupate in hive • Protect hives by reducing size of hive entrances, and using traps A.
    [Show full text]
  • Propolis Chemistry and Resin Provisioning in Australian Stingless the Fate of Bombus Cullumanus: Regression and Species Status
    [2] Chem Ecol POSTER [2] Chem Ecol POSTER Manual application of insecticidal dust in semi-field trials – effects Cuticular profiles of the robber stingless bee Lestrimelitta and its P2.5 P2.7 on honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) S potential hosts (Hymenoptera: Meliponini). Georgiadis P-T*, Pistorius J, Heimbach U Quezada-Euán JJG*, Medina R, Ramírez-Pech J, Pokorny T, Eltz T Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] In order to assess the risk of insecticidal dusts for honeybees, next to several field trials with The Neotropical stingless bee Lestrimelitta is an obligate cleptobiont that obtains food and sowing of maize and winter oilseed rape and drift of dusts on neighbouring flowering crops, nest resources by raiding other stingless bee colonies. Cleptobionts may enter a target host semi-field trials with manual application of fractionated maize dust on flowering Phacelia colony by deception, force or possibly a combination of both. In various taxa of social in- and winter oilseed rape were conducted in order to assess the effects on bees after manual sects, the blend of surface cuticular compounds is responsible for nest mate recognition. We application of different rates of active substance (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0g a.i. / ha Clothia- compared the cuticular profiles of L. niitkib from the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico and its nidin) or different particle sizes of dust (x ≤ 160µm, 250 < x > 450µm, x > 500µm; application potential hosts to determine if chemical mimicry may be used by this cleptobiont. The results rate: 2.0g a.i.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Behaviour of Tetragonula Carbonaria
    Native bees as alternative crop pollinators: Reproductive behaviour of Tetragonula carbonaria Francisco Garcia Bulle Bueno School of Life and Environmental Sciences New South Wales, 2006, Australia 2021 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Native bees as alternative crop pollinators: Reproductive behaviour of Tetragonula carbonaria Copyright © 2021 Francisco Garcia Bulle Bueno This document is typeset in Times New Roman. R code, plots and tables were in RStudio, I Author Attribution The work contained in the body of this thesis, except otherwise acknowledged, is the result of my own investigations. Chapter 2 is being prepared for submission. Francisco Garcia Bulle Bueno (FGBB) collected and analysed the data. The co-authors of this study are Liam Kendall (LK), Denise Alves (DA), Tanya Latty (TL), Tim Heard (TH), Manuel Lequerica (ML), Ben P. Oldroyd (BPO) and Rosalyn Gloag (RG). All co-authors contributed to the study design. LK, DA and ML contributed to collection of the data. RG, LK, TH and DA provided valuable feedback and editing. Chapter 3 is being prepared for submission. FGBB designed and conducted the experiment. The co-authors of this study are Bernardo Garcia Bulle Bueno (BGBB), Gabriele Buchmann (GB), TH, TL, BPO, Anette Hosoi, (AO) and RG. BGBB assisted in coding and data analyses. GB assisted in the lab work. RG assisted in the experimental design. All authors provided valuable feedback and editing. Chapter 4 is published in Journal of Experimental Biology. FGBB designed and conducted the experiment. The co-authors of this study are Isobel Ronai (IR), TL and RG.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Small Hive Beetle Infestation in the Philippines
    Journal of Apicultural Research ISSN: 0021-8839 (Print) 2078-6913 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjar20 Current status of small hive beetle infestation in the Philippines Cleofas R Cervancia, Lilia I de Guzman, Elmer A Polintan, Aimee Lynn B Dupo & Anna A Locsin To cite this article: Cleofas R Cervancia, Lilia I de Guzman, Elmer A Polintan, Aimee Lynn B Dupo & Anna A Locsin (2016): Current status of small hive beetle infestation in the Philippines, Journal of Apicultural Research, DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2016.1194053 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2016.1194053 Published online: 16 Jun 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjar20 Download by: [National Forest Service Library] Date: 21 June 2016, At: 11:26 Journal of Apicultural Research, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2016.1194053 NOTES AND COMMENTS Current status of small hive beetle infestation in the Philippines Cleofas R Cervanciaa* , Lilia I de Guzmanb, Elmer A Polintana, Aimee Lynn B Dupoa and Anna A Locsina aInstitute of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Philippines Los Ban˜os, College, Los Ban˜os, Philippines; bUSDA-ARS, Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics and Physiology Laboratory, 1157 Ben Hur Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA (Received 12 August 2015; accepted 20 May 2016) In June 2014, the small hive beetle (SHB), Aethina tumida Murray was first detected in Asia specifically in Lupon, Davao Oriental, Philippines infesting Apis mellifera colonies.
    [Show full text]