IMPLEMENTATION the Integration of CSR Into Strategy and Culture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IMPLEMENTATION the Integration of CSR Into Strategy and Culture CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION The Integration of CSR Into Strategy and Culture The first four chapters of this book set out the case for CSR, addressed the anti-CSR argument, and analyzed CSR’s strategic importance within the global economy. This chapter provides insights as to what a firm must do to integrate strategic CSR into its culture, strategy, and everyday operations. That is, when and how does a company become more socially responsible? When should a company begin adopting CSR as a strategic driving factor, for example? Is there a standard point of organizational evolution at which this should occur, or does it differ from company to company and among industries? How should management construct CSR policies that can then filter down throughout the organization? How will stakeholders distinguish between a genuine CSR strategy and a cynical attempt to create positive public relations or, worse, misleading greenwash ? We address the when by focusing on the CSR threshold , a tipping point that triggers firms to move toward strategic CSR. Then , we turn to the how by outlining the design, timing, and implementation of strategic CSR, introducing the necessary corporate infrastructure and key policy ideas in the form of a comprehensive plan of action for a firm seeking to implement CSR throughout operations . THE CSR THRESHOLD The decision of when to implement a CSR policy is compounded by why, where , and how it should be implemented, not to mention who should oversee the process. The industry context complicates things further because of the varied stages of acceptance of CSR by different competitors. Another level of complexity, differences among countries and cultures, ensures different firms will approach CSR in vastly different ways. Although the value of an effective CSR policy within spe - cific industries and firms is becoming increasingly accepted, the point at which such a policy becomes ripe for implementation (or unavoidable to those unconvinced of the benefits) varies. Thus, when depends on many factors, which include the CEO’s attitude toward CSR, the firm’s industry and actions of competitors, and the cultural environment in which the firm is operating. 119 120 — STRATEGIC CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Companies can pursue an effective CSR policy of either offense (“corporate social opportunity”) 1 or defense (CSR as “brand insurance”) .2 The innovative, proactive CEO who is convinced of the intrinsic value of CSR sees it as an opportunity to maximize company capabilities and identify new competitive advantages. 3 Examples abound : From Nike’s sustainable Air Jordan XX3 athletic shoe, which is made with “the near absence of chemical- based glues and an outsole made of recycled material ,” 4 to the wide range of products licensed under Bono’s Product (RED) brand, 5 to Anheuser-Busch’s efficient recycling policies ,6 firms seeking CSR innovations find lots of good ideas with which to work and plenty of good reasons to put them into practice. Companies with a progressive and innovative mind-set see benefits that range from being an attractive employer (helping retention and recruitment) , to greater acceptance among government agencies (such as needed zoning and tax relief), to better relations with social activists (such as Greenpeace). In short, an effective and innovative CSR program improves a firm’s relations with both its external and internal stakeholders. Timberland, for example, believes that its Path of Service program, which grants “40 hours of annual paid time off to work on service projects in [employees’] communities,” 7 raises morale and increases retention, therefore lowering training costs while inducing new skills and stoking corporate pride. 8 In terms of defense, CSR still has value by avoiding criticism and other attacks on the firm or its offerings. In this instance, CSR is a rational choice that acts like a brand insurance pol - icy, minimizing or offsetting stakeholder disillusionment in response to perceived lapses in CSR. 9 A good example of this approach is the USCAP (United States Climate Action Partnership, http://www.us-cap.org/), formed by a group of energy and manufacturing firms, which “supports the introduction of carbon limits and trading” as a means of mitigating fed - eral legislation designed to control carbon emissions. 10 Either approach (offense or defense) assumes an up-front investment in creating CSR poli - cies; when to introduce CSR into the strategic process, however, depends on the driving force behind its implementation. For those managers convinced of CSR’s strategic potential, there is no time like the present. Innovative ideas and policies that maximize market opportunities , minimize costs, and increase productivity can produce immediate benefits. For managers yet to be persuaded by the CSR argument, however, the temptation exists to delay as long as pos - sible. Worse, cynical managers might see CSR as merely a public relations exercise or, worse still, postpone hard CSR choices by assuming they can avoid the expense altogether. Perhaps this is analogous to someone who imagines that, as long as they remain healthy , they will be able to avoid outlays for health insurance . Nevertheless, a crisis point can arise. Once reached and stakeholder backlash becomes suf - ficient to warrant the introduction of a reactionary CSR policy, however, it may be too late. As mentioned in Chapter 3, Walmart announced that it would donate $35 million to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation in April 2005. Although commendable, this action took place “barely a week after environmentalists forged a broad alliance with organized labor and com - munity groups to attack Wal-Mart and its business practices.” 11 Complicating matters further, this threshold of when to act ebbs and flows with public perceptions and media spin, which can change with the next news cycle. Even more confounding is the variability that exists among industries, cultures, and nations, as well as among companies within the same industry. In summary, firms introduce CSR for different reasons. Implementing CSR proactively throughout the firm can generate multiple business advantages and may yield additional benefits associated with first-mover status. In addition, the genuine implementation of CSR, whether for Chapter 5: Implementation — 121 offensive or defensive reasons, generates insurance-like benefits that render CSR lapses less damaging if committed due to factors outside the firm’s control. Whatever the motivation, how - ever, there is a CSR threshold in every industry that acts as a CSR point of no return. The sooner CSR is introduced, the less likely a firm is to cross this “tipping point,” 12 which varies for each company (depending on whether it is the market leader or a smaller player) and within each industry (some industries are more susceptible to stakeholder backlash than others). The variable nature of this CSR threshold suggests why some companies perceive CSR to be of greater or lesser importance to their particular organization at different points in time . Still, why is it that different companies and industries have different CSR thresholds for different reasons? An important part of the answer comes from the business-level strategy a company pursues . Variation Among Companies Analyzing a company’s business-level strategy reveals how it distinguishes its products in the marketplace. Its value proposition is captured in its strategy and attracts stakeholder groups, particularly customers. In turn, the firm’s strategy has a direct impact on the CSR threshold for that company within its industry. Consider these comparisons in light of Figure 5.1. Walmart’s strategy, for example, prob - ably raises the company’s CSR threshold; that is, it has more CSR leeway and can “get away Figure 5.1 The Business-Level CSR Threshold Competitive Advantage Cost Differentiation d e Niche-Focused s Niche-Focused u c Cost Leadership Differentiation o F e p o c of S t ac e p s v Im re i r u t e il i t a t a re F e G SR p C m o C d a o r Cost Differentiation B 122 — STRATEGIC CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY with” more because its value proposition is based on a business-level strategy of low cost. Thus, a Walmart shopper is unlikely to be surprised to discover that the company favors prod - ucts manufactured overseas in low-cost environments, rather than higher cost products made by U.S. employees . For a company like The Body Shop, however, which has built its reputa - tion and customer base largely on the social justice issues it chooses to advocate (such as no animal testing and fair trade), the CSR threshold at which customers, media, and society react may have a much lower tipping point. Thus, The Body Shop’s stakeholders are more likely to have a lower threshold of tolerance for perceived CSR violations. Restated, The Body Shop consumers would expect the company to live up to the values that attracted them in the first place, which translates into a correspondingly lower CSR threshold for the firm. For example, one CSR error by The Body Shop may well be equal, in terms of stakeholder perception, to multiple CSR oversights by Walmart. As suggested by Figure 5.1, business-level strategies can be divided into those that pur - sue low costs and those that pursue differentiation (see Chapter 2). The low -cost approach suggests an ability to deliver products or services at a price below that of competitors. The products that Walmart sells, for example, are not fundamentally different from those of its competitors. As a result, the firm gains its competitive advantage from its “everyday low prices, ” which enable its customers to “Save money. Live better.” Walmart is able to gener - ate its low prices because of its laser-like focus on minimizing costs throughout the value chain. Differentiation strategies, however, offer the customer something unique, such as a luxury car from Rolls Royce, for which there is often an associated price premium .
Recommended publications
  • Stewardship of Tomorrow's Company
    Tomorrow’s Owners Stewardship of tomorrow’s company Contents 01 Foreword 02 Executive Summary 10 Part 1 – Introduction 14 Part 2 – The context 18 Part 3 – What does ownership mean? 28 Part 4 – The changing ownership landscape 40 Part 5 – The array of investors 41 Part 4 – Private equity 43 Part 4 – Hedge funds 46 Part 4 – Sovereign wealth funds 49 Part 4 – Institutional investors 52 Part 4 – Families, employees, foundations and others 60 Part 6 – Implications and questions 68 Part 7 – Looking ahead 70 Acknowledgements 72 Sources and notes Foreword The ownership of companies is a crucial subject. It is critical not only to the way companies are led and managed, but also to the impact they have on the world in which we live. Hermes and Tomorrow’s Company are delighted to have worked together on this first report, with Hermes as sponsor of the research. Hermes, itself owned by the BT Pension Scheme (BTPS), acts as the investment managers for the BTPS and has a proud track record of exercising ownership and stewardship responsibilities on behalf of BTPS and other clients. Tomorrow’s Company has a tradition of tackling the really difficult questions that business knows to be important, and doing so in a systematic way, bringing shared business values to bear in a spirit of openness and inquiry. From its first report – Tomorrow’s Company: the role of business in a changing world (1995) – it has argued that the job of leaders is to create clear purpose and values and strong relationships with shareholders, employees, communities, suppliers and customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Proposal for Mind Shift 2.0 a Logical Framework Analysis
    Mind Shift Project Proposal - 2008 UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING M. PHIL. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED ASSIGNMENT TO COMPRISE A PORTION OF TOTAL MARK STUDENT: MONICA GRAAFF 1080205 -1981 SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR MARK SWILLING Graduation date: March 2008 TITLE: Project Proposal for Mind Shift 2.0 A Logical Framework Analysis “The policies we adopt, the decisions we make, and the strategies we pursue over the next decade or two will determine the future of our species and the trajectory of the planet for the foreseeable future. That is an awesome responsibility to say the least. It is also a huge opportunity… Business - more than either government or civil society - is uniquely equipped at this point in history to lead us towards a sustainable world in the years ahead … corporations are the only entities in the world today with the technology, resources, capacity and global reach required.” (Hart 2005) A COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT “FOR PEOPLE WHO CAN CHANGE THE WORLD” Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Section One: Context Analysis 7 Introduction 7 Methodology for establishing the project‘s context 7 Figure 1: Area of Influence: Mind Shift 8 Figure 2: SWOT Analysis: State of the Planet 9 The project‘s broader context: SWOT Analysis 9 The project‘s communications context 16 Conclusion 19 Section Two: Stakeholder Analysis 21 Background: Responses to global crisis 21 Stakeholder analysis for Mind Shift 27 Section Three: Problem Analysis / Situational Analysis 35 Problem identification
    [Show full text]
  • Board Discussions What Neds Have Been Debating
    www.pwc.co.uk Board discussions What NEDs have been debating March 2017 Contents Introduction 1 A global political update 2 Data analytics and its role in relation to strategy 6 General Data Protection Regulation and data privacy 9 Blockchain and its far-reaching implications for business 12 Tax – a reputational risk for business? 15 Culture as a risk management tool and a licence to operate 18 Cyber security – stage 1 21 Cyber security – stage 2 24 Responding to investor activism 28 Crisis management 30 Executive remuneration 33 Audit Committee update (ACN) 37 Introduction PwC’s programme for Non- The workshops explored how the Board At a more macro level, in February we Executive Directors (NEDs) can influence and shape culture, had A global political update from includes a series of briefings, bringing values to life, building trust Eurasia Group. In these uncertain workshops and other events to help with stakeholders and assessing, political times, this early evening event address the need to keep up to date measuring and monitoring culture. provided an overview of Eurasia Group's with Board level issues. This As one specific area of risk, the darker top 10 political risks for 2017 to further document summarises the side of the relentless technology inform strategic decisions. discussions arising from our developments, such as Blockchain and Developments for Audit Committees events over the past six months. data analytics, was focused on in our two – which continue to have a full agenda – The season began with our September Cyber security workshops. The first were not overlooked. A series of update briefings on General Data Protection workshop covered a broad landscape of workshops provided a regulatory update, Regulation (GDPR) and data privacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Company number: 03164984 Charity number: 1055908 The Centre for Tomorrow’s Company Report and financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2017 The Centre for Tomorrow’s Company Trustees’ annual report for the year ended 31 March 2017 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Achievements, performance and impact ............................................................................................................... 6 Communications ................................................................................................................................................. 12 Partnership .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Financial review ................................................................................................................................................... 16 Plans for the future .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Structure, governance and management ............................................................................................................ 20 Statement
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 March 2014
    THE CENTRE FOR TOMORROW’S COMPANY REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2014 Company No. 3164984 Registered Charity No.1055908 Contents Page Legal and administrative information 02 Report of the trustees 03 1. About Tomorrow’s Company 04 2. Our Achievements & Impact 06 3. Value Delivery 20 4. Looking ahead 24 Statement of Trustees’ Responsibilities 27 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of 28 Centre for Tomorrow’s Company Statement of Financial Activities 30 Balance Sheet 31 Notes to the Financial Statements 32 1 Legal and administrative information Trustees Barrie Collins (Chairman) Jean Gomm (resigned 23/09/2014) Mark Goyder Paul Howard (appointed 20/03/2014; resigned 23/09/2014) Maria Johannessen (resigned 23/09/2014) Adrian Laycock (resigned 7/11/2013) Margot Miller (resigned 7/11/2013) David Philips (resigned 25/06/2013) Mark Wade (resigned 25/06/2013) Senior Management Team at 31 March 2014 Tony Manwaring – Chief Executive Mark Goyder – Founder Director Timothy Morris – Director of Finance Pat Cleverly – Director of Research, Strategy & Policy Secretary Julian Baddeley Registered Office and Business Address Samuel House 6 St Alban’s Street London SW1Y 4SQ Auditor Buzzacott LLP 130 Wood Street London EC2V 6DL Bankers The Co-operative Bank 80 Cornhill London EC3V 3NJ 2 Report of the trustees The trustees are pleased to present their report together with the financial statements of Tomorrow’s Company for the year ended 31 March 2014. The legal and administrative information set out on page 2 forms part of this report. The financial statements appear in the format required by the Statement of Recommended Practice for Accounting and Reporting by Charities (revised March 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • The Blended Value Map
    THE BLENDED VALUE MAP: Tracking the Intersects and Opportunities of Economic, Social and Environmental Value Creation October, 2003 ii We would like to thank the Skoll Foundation for its support of document publication costs that allowed us to distribute it free of charge to a variety of conferences and events. Hard copies of this document that were distributed by the Project Team were printed on 100% post consumer recycled paper. ISBN Reference Pending Copyright 2003, Jed Emerson. All rights reserved. www.blendedvalue.org iii In board rooms, on street corners, in trans-national corporations and grass-roots enterprises, there is a convergence of new thought and path-breaking practice that threatens the ways of past decades by giving birth to a 21st Century vision of investing and venture creation that holds the promise of true transformation. This document presents but a blurred snapshot of an international parade of diverse players and institutions. This dynamic explosion of activity cannot be captured by a single perspective or group of observers—it is beyond our individual capacities to truly track (much less understand the full implications of!) the deeply profound changes presently underway around the world. The construction of this map in less than five months would not have been possible without the incredible contributions of some of the people engaged in this global revolution. While the statements, conclusions and decisions made regarding what to include in this Map are the responsibility of the Project Team, this document—like the value revolution itself—is the product of many, many people. Simply listing the names of those who contributed to this effort does little justice to accurately representing the time, thought and creative passions invested by these people, and others not on this list, in helping make possible not only this introductory map, but the stunning changes taking place around us all.
    [Show full text]
  • CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY a Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning & the UK’S Leading Companies
    Investing 30/11/2004 12:27 Page 1 Investing in CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning & the UK’s Leading Companies Published in Association with Consultant editor JOHN HANCOCK Investing TP 30/11/2004 12:28 Page 1 Investing in CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning & the UK’s Leading Companies Consultant editor JOHN HANCOCK London & Sterling, VA 000_Prelims_ICSR.qxd 06/11/2004 1:40 pm Page ii Dedicated to Crena and Camilla for their love and support Publisher’s note Every possible effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this book is accurate at the time of going to press, and the publishers and authors cannot accept responsi- bility for any errors or omissions, however caused. No responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting, or refraining from action, as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by the editor, the publisher or any of the authors. First published in Great Britain and the United States in 2004 by Kogan Page Limited. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior per- mission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licences issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned addresses: 120 Pentonville Road 22883 Quicksilver Drive London N1 9JN Sterling VA 20166-2012 United Kingdom USA www.kogan-page.co.uk © John Hancock, 2005 The right of John Hancock to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]