Board Discussions What Neds Have Been Debating

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

www.pwc.co.uk Board discussions What NEDs have been debating March 2017 Contents Introduction 1 A global political update 2 Data analytics and its role in relation to strategy 6 General Data Protection Regulation and data privacy 9 Blockchain and its far-reaching implications for business 12 Tax – a reputational risk for business? 15 Culture as a risk management tool and a licence to operate 18 Cyber security – stage 1 21 Cyber security – stage 2 24 Responding to investor activism 28 Crisis management 30 Executive remuneration 33 Audit Committee update (ACN) 37 Introduction PwC’s programme for Non- The workshops explored how the Board At a more macro level, in February we Executive Directors (NEDs) can influence and shape culture, had A global political update from includes a series of briefings, bringing values to life, building trust Eurasia Group. In these uncertain workshops and other events to help with stakeholders and assessing, political times, this early evening event address the need to keep up to date measuring and monitoring culture. provided an overview of Eurasia Group's with Board level issues. This As one specific area of risk, the darker top 10 political risks for 2017 to further document summarises the side of the relentless technology inform strategic decisions. discussions arising from our developments, such as Blockchain and Developments for Audit Committees events over the past six months. data analytics, was focused on in our two – which continue to have a full agenda – The season began with our September Cyber security workshops. The first were not overlooked. A series of update briefings on General Data Protection workshop covered a broad landscape of workshops provided a regulatory update, Regulation (GDPR) and data privacy. cyber security basics – setting context, a look at developments in corporate The GDPR is now in its final form and explaining why this is a Board issue and reporting and accounting, as well as a will come into force at the start of 2018, providing a framework to help NEDs session considering user access replacing the existing Data Protection think about the key areas. The second management. The latter has become ever Directive. It will transform the data allowed for a deeper dive into four key more important as the risk and threat privacy and protection landscape by areas – developing a business landscape continues to evolve putting all businesses at risk of fines and perspective, assessing current state, due to increasing interconnectedness. sanctions if they fail to protect personal improvement recipes and handling For those on Remuneration data. Individuals no longer have to prove incidents and crises. Committees there were sessions that they have suffered financial loss but Investor activism and how to respond exploring issues with executive pay, can just cite distress. was explored in another of our including public perceptions of An early evening event in September workshops. Investor activism is inequality. Recent corporate governance explored Blockchain and its far- increasing in the UK as volatile equity developments and Government reaching implications for business. markets provide activist investors with consultations aiming to address these This technology, which underpins the opportunities to build stakes in were discussed. Consideration was given crypto-currency Bitcoin, presents far undervalued companies. Boards can be to what this means for Remuneration wider opportunities and challenges than hesitant to react but being on the back Committees in 2017 and beyond in terms simply disrupting business models in the foot often makes it harder to respond of transparency, strategic alignment and financial services sector. It consists of effectively to shareholders further down flexibility, stakeholder engagement and ‘blocks’ of data in a digital ledger which, the line. The session considered what fairness. in turn, creates a single shared view of characteristics an activist looks for in a We also ran a number of interactive the blocks that every participant in the potential target and how Boards might sessions throughout the year including network can access simultaneously. respond, both in terms of taking steps to a 'Game of Threats'TM cyber attack Blockchain therefore has the potential prevent an approach but also what to do simulation, a 'False Assurance' film event to remove the need for a back office/ once one has happened. with the ICAEW and various webcasts reconciliation process and also eliminate Recognising that in today’s complex and exploring topical business issues. We plan the ‘middleman’. As it is sector agnostic, inter-connected business environment to include further interactive sessions in the potential implications of this are crises will happen, the workshop season future programmes. significant. concluded with a session looking at In all of the events there was considerable Our October early evening briefing Crisis management. Getting crisis debate, with a sharing of ideas on the looked at Tax – a reputational risk for response right is not something that can topics and discussion around the role every business. There is heightened be improvised when a crisis strikes and NEDs can play. The combination of public, media and political interest in the capabilities that underpin that expert knowledge with the invaluable matters of tax policy and fairness. This response take time to build. In today’s sharing of experiences with peers adds brings significant reputational risk and social media driven world, Boards no real value to these sessions, and I would has elevated tax to a Boardroom issue. longer have the luxury of time to consider like to thank all those NEDs who The need to respond to a broad range of their course of action and need to be able participated. We will continue to focus on stakeholders means that Boards need to to put a previously developed, and matters featuring on Board agendas and be comfortable that they understand and preferably rehearsed, plan swiftly into look forward to further insightful can appropriately articulate their operation. discussions over the next six months company’s tax strategy and how the Our January briefings revisited the of the programme. associated risks are being managed. technology angle looking at Data Risk is a constant feature on the Board analytics and its role in relation to agenda, even more so in these uncertain strategy. The world is at an inflection times, and we continue to focus on point where artificial intelligence and different aspects of this topic. Our winter data analytics can help businesses make workshop season included sessions better and faster decisions. However, too Andy Kemp considering Culture as a risk often data analytics is used to analyse the Chairman, management tool and a licence past rather than predict the future and Non-Executive Director programme to operate. inform decisions. To become a data- driven organisation, leadership needs to [email protected] Culture is currently an area of focus for set the tone and deliver on it, using March 2017 regulators and others as society attempts predictive analytics to support strategic to respond to a lack of trust in business. decision-making. Board discussions March 2017 | 1 A global political update Political context is important for business as political stability Presenter: encourages a positive outlook which has a knock-on effect on the Sean West, Global Deputy CEO, economy. Political risk can impact all aspects of a company’s business Eurasia Group such as consumer sentiment, workforce quality and availability, taxes [email protected] and foreign exchange. Proper planning and management of political risks can therefore help to drive commercial success, especially in emerging and frontier markets. Global political update Independent America • The need to prioritise stability over The session was structured around This is not about the US becoming difficult policy choices risks policy Eurasia Group’s top 10 political risks for isolationist but unilateralist. failures such as a re-inflation of asset 2017. bubbles. • Militarily, it’s all about America and As initial context, it was noted that the other nations will not necessarily be A weaker Merkel world is becoming riskier. For the first able to depend on US commitments. Merkel will be re-elected but with a time, Eurasia Group are using the term • Economically, it’s about industrial smaller majority. Previously Europe’s ‘geopolitical recession’, where a policy that squeezes countries and indispensable leader, she will be a substantial series of events has dragged companies for better deals for US weakened figure. down the positive impacts of politics. workers. • Externally, Europe will be For the last five years, Eurasia Group has • Values wise, the US focuses on challenged by France’s elections, been talking about a ‘G Zero world’, one transactions rather than principles. Greece’s finances, Brexit without global leadership. This has now Currently, therefore, there is the negotiations and relations with both combined with a populist revolt against Russia and Turkey. globalisation whereas domestic policies absence of a unified West supporting • Domestically, Germany will be were previously permissive towards it. democracy from the same point of view, challenged by their refugee policy, This negative trend in domestic politics as well as the potential for negative terrorist attacks, corporate crises in key economies combines with bilateral relations. Implications of an and populism with the Alternative negative external conditions at the independent America include: for Germany gaining ground. geopolitical level resulting in the • chaos from an absent superpower – geopolitical recession. particularly in Europe and the Merkel is increasingly becoming a lone voice for keeping Russian sanctions A geopolitical recession plays out over Middle East in place. a much longer timeframe. In Eurasia • weakening of global institutions – Group’s projections, few countries show global fragmentation No reform encouraging signs over the next six • the rise of China and possible Some countries that were previously months. In a sense, a neutral political conflict.
Recommended publications
  • IMPLEMENTATION the Integration of CSR Into Strategy and Culture

    IMPLEMENTATION the Integration of CSR Into Strategy and Culture

    CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION The Integration of CSR Into Strategy and Culture The first four chapters of this book set out the case for CSR, addressed the anti-CSR argument, and analyzed CSR’s strategic importance within the global economy. This chapter provides insights as to what a firm must do to integrate strategic CSR into its culture, strategy, and everyday operations. That is, when and how does a company become more socially responsible? When should a company begin adopting CSR as a strategic driving factor, for example? Is there a standard point of organizational evolution at which this should occur, or does it differ from company to company and among industries? How should management construct CSR policies that can then filter down throughout the organization? How will stakeholders distinguish between a genuine CSR strategy and a cynical attempt to create positive public relations or, worse, misleading greenwash ? We address the when by focusing on the CSR threshold , a tipping point that triggers firms to move toward strategic CSR. Then , we turn to the how by outlining the design, timing, and implementation of strategic CSR, introducing the necessary corporate infrastructure and key policy ideas in the form of a comprehensive plan of action for a firm seeking to implement CSR throughout operations . THE CSR THRESHOLD The decision of when to implement a CSR policy is compounded by why, where , and how it should be implemented, not to mention who should oversee the process. The industry context complicates things further because of the varied stages of acceptance of CSR by different competitors.
  • Stewardship of Tomorrow's Company

    Stewardship of Tomorrow's Company

    Tomorrow’s Owners Stewardship of tomorrow’s company Contents 01 Foreword 02 Executive Summary 10 Part 1 – Introduction 14 Part 2 – The context 18 Part 3 – What does ownership mean? 28 Part 4 – The changing ownership landscape 40 Part 5 – The array of investors 41 Part 4 – Private equity 43 Part 4 – Hedge funds 46 Part 4 – Sovereign wealth funds 49 Part 4 – Institutional investors 52 Part 4 – Families, employees, foundations and others 60 Part 6 – Implications and questions 68 Part 7 – Looking ahead 70 Acknowledgements 72 Sources and notes Foreword The ownership of companies is a crucial subject. It is critical not only to the way companies are led and managed, but also to the impact they have on the world in which we live. Hermes and Tomorrow’s Company are delighted to have worked together on this first report, with Hermes as sponsor of the research. Hermes, itself owned by the BT Pension Scheme (BTPS), acts as the investment managers for the BTPS and has a proud track record of exercising ownership and stewardship responsibilities on behalf of BTPS and other clients. Tomorrow’s Company has a tradition of tackling the really difficult questions that business knows to be important, and doing so in a systematic way, bringing shared business values to bear in a spirit of openness and inquiry. From its first report – Tomorrow’s Company: the role of business in a changing world (1995) – it has argued that the job of leaders is to create clear purpose and values and strong relationships with shareholders, employees, communities, suppliers and customers.
  • Project Proposal for Mind Shift 2.0 a Logical Framework Analysis

    Project Proposal for Mind Shift 2.0 a Logical Framework Analysis

    Mind Shift Project Proposal - 2008 UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING M. PHIL. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED ASSIGNMENT TO COMPRISE A PORTION OF TOTAL MARK STUDENT: MONICA GRAAFF 1080205 -1981 SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR MARK SWILLING Graduation date: March 2008 TITLE: Project Proposal for Mind Shift 2.0 A Logical Framework Analysis “The policies we adopt, the decisions we make, and the strategies we pursue over the next decade or two will determine the future of our species and the trajectory of the planet for the foreseeable future. That is an awesome responsibility to say the least. It is also a huge opportunity… Business - more than either government or civil society - is uniquely equipped at this point in history to lead us towards a sustainable world in the years ahead … corporations are the only entities in the world today with the technology, resources, capacity and global reach required.” (Hart 2005) A COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT “FOR PEOPLE WHO CAN CHANGE THE WORLD” Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Section One: Context Analysis 7 Introduction 7 Methodology for establishing the project‘s context 7 Figure 1: Area of Influence: Mind Shift 8 Figure 2: SWOT Analysis: State of the Planet 9 The project‘s broader context: SWOT Analysis 9 The project‘s communications context 16 Conclusion 19 Section Two: Stakeholder Analysis 21 Background: Responses to global crisis 21 Stakeholder analysis for Mind Shift 27 Section Three: Problem Analysis / Situational Analysis 35 Problem identification
  • Annual Report 2017

    Annual Report 2017

    Company number: 03164984 Charity number: 1055908 The Centre for Tomorrow’s Company Report and financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2017 The Centre for Tomorrow’s Company Trustees’ annual report for the year ended 31 March 2017 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Achievements, performance and impact ............................................................................................................... 6 Communications ................................................................................................................................................. 12 Partnership .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Financial review ................................................................................................................................................... 16 Plans for the future .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Structure, governance and management ............................................................................................................ 20 Statement
  • Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 March 2014

    THE CENTRE FOR TOMORROW’S COMPANY REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2014 Company No. 3164984 Registered Charity No.1055908 Contents Page Legal and administrative information 02 Report of the trustees 03 1. About Tomorrow’s Company 04 2. Our Achievements & Impact 06 3. Value Delivery 20 4. Looking ahead 24 Statement of Trustees’ Responsibilities 27 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of 28 Centre for Tomorrow’s Company Statement of Financial Activities 30 Balance Sheet 31 Notes to the Financial Statements 32 1 Legal and administrative information Trustees Barrie Collins (Chairman) Jean Gomm (resigned 23/09/2014) Mark Goyder Paul Howard (appointed 20/03/2014; resigned 23/09/2014) Maria Johannessen (resigned 23/09/2014) Adrian Laycock (resigned 7/11/2013) Margot Miller (resigned 7/11/2013) David Philips (resigned 25/06/2013) Mark Wade (resigned 25/06/2013) Senior Management Team at 31 March 2014 Tony Manwaring – Chief Executive Mark Goyder – Founder Director Timothy Morris – Director of Finance Pat Cleverly – Director of Research, Strategy & Policy Secretary Julian Baddeley Registered Office and Business Address Samuel House 6 St Alban’s Street London SW1Y 4SQ Auditor Buzzacott LLP 130 Wood Street London EC2V 6DL Bankers The Co-operative Bank 80 Cornhill London EC3V 3NJ 2 Report of the trustees The trustees are pleased to present their report together with the financial statements of Tomorrow’s Company for the year ended 31 March 2014. The legal and administrative information set out on page 2 forms part of this report. The financial statements appear in the format required by the Statement of Recommended Practice for Accounting and Reporting by Charities (revised March 2005).
  • The Blended Value Map

    The Blended Value Map

    THE BLENDED VALUE MAP: Tracking the Intersects and Opportunities of Economic, Social and Environmental Value Creation October, 2003 ii We would like to thank the Skoll Foundation for its support of document publication costs that allowed us to distribute it free of charge to a variety of conferences and events. Hard copies of this document that were distributed by the Project Team were printed on 100% post consumer recycled paper. ISBN Reference Pending Copyright 2003, Jed Emerson. All rights reserved. www.blendedvalue.org iii In board rooms, on street corners, in trans-national corporations and grass-roots enterprises, there is a convergence of new thought and path-breaking practice that threatens the ways of past decades by giving birth to a 21st Century vision of investing and venture creation that holds the promise of true transformation. This document presents but a blurred snapshot of an international parade of diverse players and institutions. This dynamic explosion of activity cannot be captured by a single perspective or group of observers—it is beyond our individual capacities to truly track (much less understand the full implications of!) the deeply profound changes presently underway around the world. The construction of this map in less than five months would not have been possible without the incredible contributions of some of the people engaged in this global revolution. While the statements, conclusions and decisions made regarding what to include in this Map are the responsibility of the Project Team, this document—like the value revolution itself—is the product of many, many people. Simply listing the names of those who contributed to this effort does little justice to accurately representing the time, thought and creative passions invested by these people, and others not on this list, in helping make possible not only this introductory map, but the stunning changes taking place around us all.
  • CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY a Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning & the UK’S Leading Companies

    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY a Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning & the UK’S Leading Companies

    Investing 30/11/2004 12:27 Page 1 Investing in CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning & the UK’s Leading Companies Published in Association with Consultant editor JOHN HANCOCK Investing TP 30/11/2004 12:28 Page 1 Investing in CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY A Guide to Best Practice, Business Planning & the UK’s Leading Companies Consultant editor JOHN HANCOCK London & Sterling, VA 000_Prelims_ICSR.qxd 06/11/2004 1:40 pm Page ii Dedicated to Crena and Camilla for their love and support Publisher’s note Every possible effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this book is accurate at the time of going to press, and the publishers and authors cannot accept responsi- bility for any errors or omissions, however caused. No responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting, or refraining from action, as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by the editor, the publisher or any of the authors. First published in Great Britain and the United States in 2004 by Kogan Page Limited. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior per- mission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licences issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned addresses: 120 Pentonville Road 22883 Quicksilver Drive London N1 9JN Sterling VA 20166-2012 United Kingdom USA www.kogan-page.co.uk © John Hancock, 2005 The right of John Hancock to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.