DOCSLIB.ORG

Time Synchronization for Ethernet Communication Based Line Differential Protection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Time Synchronization for Ethernet Communication Based Line Differential Protection DEGREE PROJECT IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2017 Time Synchronization for Ethernet Communication based Line Differential Protection SURYA SEETHARAMAN KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Abstract Most of the industrial manufactures and designers of Power Substation Automation Protec- tion Control products are under pressure regarding the existing communication architecture of the Line Differential Protection Application. Currently the widely used technologies include SONET/SDH which are circuit switched networks, that are no longer predominant. They are been replaced with Packet Switched Networks everywhere. Moreover dedicated network equip- ment is required to be maintained for using SDH/SONET technologies. Hence it is becoming increasingly hard for the utilities to get access to and maintain the SDH/SONET networks. The main objective of this thesis work is to develop an alternative communication solution in order to migrate away from these SDH/SONET networks. The project work is done such that the requirements for the Line Differential Protection Communication are carefully analysed and a solution is designed such that it fulfils those requirements. Following that the imple- mentation and evaluation of the solution is performed. In the end, a testing of this solution is also done on a real-time WAN network running the Line Differential Protection function, in order to verify the working of the solution and study the challenges of a WAN deployment scenario in future. i Abstrakt De flesta industriella tillverkare och designers till produkter av system f¨orstationsautomation ¨ar under press ang˚aendeden existerande kommunikationsarkitekturen f¨orLinjedifferentialskydds- till¨ampningar. De f¨orn¨arvarande utbredda teknologierna som anv¨ands,som SONET/SDH, ¨ar kretskopplade n¨atverkvilket inte l¨angre¨arden dominerande n¨atverksprincipen. Dessa ¨arp˚av¨ag att bli ersatta av paketf¨ormedlade n¨atverk.Dessutom kr¨avsdet att dedikerad n¨atverksutrust- ning m˚aste underh˚allasf¨oratt anv¨andasmed SONET/SDH-teknologier. D¨arf¨orb¨orjar det bli kr¨avandeoch sv˚artf¨orverktygen att ges ˚atkomst samt underh˚allaSONET/SDH-n¨atverk. Huvudm˚aletmed denna uppsats ¨ar att utveckla en alternativ kommunikationsl¨osningi syfte att byta ut dessa SDH/SONET-n¨atverk.Arbetet ¨arutf¨ortgenom att f¨orstnoggrant analysera kraven f¨orLinjedifferentialskydds-kommunikation f¨oratt sedan finna och designa en l¨osning som uppfyller dessa krav. D¨arefterf¨oljeren implementation och utv¨arderingav den funna l¨osningen. I sista fasen genomf¨orsen testning av l¨osningeni ett realtids WAN-n¨atverksom k¨orLinjedifferentialskydds-funktionen, detta f¨oratt verifiera hur den funna l¨osningenfungerar samt att studera utmaningar f¨oren framtida WAN implementation. ii Acknowledgement This thesis work has been conducted in collaboration with ABB Substation Automation Prod- ucts in V¨aster˚asas well as with the Industrial Information and Control Systems department at KTH in Stockholm. This project would not have been possible without a lot of people for whom I hold a great amount of respect. Hence I would like to express my gratitude towards them and acknowledge their roles in making this thesis work happen. Johan S¨aljhas been my supervisor at ABB. He has been a pillar of great support throughout the thesis project specially when it came to technical design and guidance. Bjorn Lexelius from ABB has also been very helpful and skilled when it comes to the IED communication area. I am very thankful to both of them for sharing their broad expertise and for supervising my thesis in a systematic and dedicated manner. Moreover, it has been a great pleasure, working in the team of Henrik B¨ackstrand. In his capacity as a line manager he has helped me with all administration matters as well as with the arranging of the required technical equipment. His timely advice has always kept me motivated. Furthermore, my supervisor from KTH Fabian Hohn has been really impressive and of note- worthy help to me. During the course of my thesis work, he has always been there - giving suggestions for improvisation, clarifying doubts in case I got stuck on technical aspects, en- suring I stay on track with the project. Most importantly he has constantly encouraged me to do well right from the beginning. Professor Lars Nordstr¨omwho is head of the department of Electric Power and Energy Systems at KTH was acting as the responsible examiner of the thesis. I would like to thank him for having given me this great opportunity to conduct the thesis with ABB. Lastly, I would like to thank all my colleagues from ABB, friends from KTH and my lov- ing family in India for supporting and encouraging me throughout. iii Contents Abstract i Abstrakt ii Acknowledgement iii List of Figures viii List of Tables x Nomenclature xi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Problem Statement . .1 1.2 Problem Description . .1 1.3 Project Goals and Scope . .2 1.4 Project Outline . .2 2 Background 4 2.1 Line Differential Protection . .4 2.1.1 Working Principle . .4 2.1.2 Requirements of the Protection Interface . .5 2.2 Existing Industrial Solutions : SDH/SONET . .5 2.3 Motivation for IP-based Ethernet Networks . .6 2.4 Time Synchronization . .7 2.4.1 Inter-Range Instrumentation Group - B . .8 2.4.2 Network Time Protocol . .8 2.4.3 SyncE . .9 2.5 Precision Time Protocol . .9 2.5.1 Protocol Details . 10 2.5.1.1 PTP devices . 10 2.5.1.2 PTP Messages . 11 2.5.1.3 PTP Communication Path . 12 iv 2.5.1.4 PTP Delay Mechanisms . 12 2.5.2 Working Principle . 17 2.5.2.1 Best Master Clock Algorithm . 18 2.5.2.2 Synchronization . 19 2.5.3 PTP Profiles . 20 2.5.3.1 PC37.238 IEEE-1588 : PTP Power Profile . 20 2.5.3.2 IEC/IEEE 61850-9-3:2016 : PTP Power Utility Profile . 21 2.5.3.3 IEEE G.8275.1/G.8275.2 : PTP Telecom Profile . 21 2.6 PTP versus existing methods . 22 3 Methodology 24 3.1 Proposed Solution . 24 3.2 Satisfying the Requirements of the Protection Interface . 24 3.3 Approach . 25 3.3.1 Communication : Packet Switched Networks . 25 3.3.2 Synchronization : Precision Time Protocol . 25 4 Implementation 26 4.1 Resources Used . 26 4.1.1 Hardware Network Components . 26 4.1.2 Software Tools . 32 4.2 Network Topologies . 35 4.2.1 N1: Point to Point Connection between two IEDs . 35 4.2.2 N2: Introducing L2 switches between the IED's . 37 4.2.3 N3: Three Ended Application - GPS to IED . 38 4.2.4 N4: Three Ended Application - GPS to switch . 39 4.2.5 N5: Hardware-in-the-Loop Trial with OMNET++ . 40 4.2.6 N6: Unlocked from GPS time reference . 41 4.3 Measurement Conditions . 42 4.3.1 Network Device Settings . 42 4.3.1.1 IED Configuration . 42 4.3.1.2 Switch Configuration . 43 4.3.1.3 GPS Clock Configuration . 43 4.3.2 Oscilloscope Settings . 43 4.3.3 Differential Current Settings . 43 5 Evaluation 44 5.1 E1: Functionality Testing . 44 5.1.1 Time Synchronization using PTP . 44 5.1.2 Line Differential Protection Communication over Ethernet . 44 5.2 E2: Performance Testing . 46 v 5.2.1 Time to Synchronize at Start-Up . 46 5.2.2 Time to Re-Synchronize . 46 5.2.3 Time synchronization Accuracy . 48 5.2.3.1 N1 : For the point to point Set-Up . 48 5.2.3.2 N2 : For introduction of L2 switches Set-Up . 49 5.2.3.3 N3 : Three-ended Application Set-Up . 50 5.2.3.4 N4 : Three-ended Application Set-Up with GPS to switch . 51 5.2.3.5 N6 : Unlocked to UTC . 52 5.3 E3: Stress Testing . 54 5.3.1 Effect on Application Communication . 56 5.3.2 Effect on PTP Communication . 57 6 Feasibility for WAN Deployment 61 6.1 WAN Description and Set-up . 61 6.2 Testing and Results . 62 6.2.1 Case 1 : With the ABB v1.2 IEDs . 63 6.2.2 Case 2 : With the ABB v2.2 IEDs . 64 6.2.2.1 Case 2.1 : Data and Sync messages over Primary route . 66 6.2.2.2 Case 2.2 : Data over Secondary and Sync over Primary routes 66 6.2.2.3 Case 2.3 : Data and Sync messages over Secondary Route . 67 6.3 Challenges during Testing . 69 6.4 Customer Requirements after the Testing . 70 6.5 General Industry Challenges for WAN Deployment . 70 7 Conclusion and Discussion 72 7.1 Conclusion . 72 7.2 Future Work . 72 Bibliography 73 Appendix 73 vi List of Figures 2.1 Line Current Differential Protection [3] . .4 2.2 PTP Clocks [16] . 11 2.3 PTP End-to-End Delay Mechanism [19] . 13 2.4 Hardware Timestamping during the transport of a Sync message [19] . 14 2.5 Working of peer-delay messages in Peer-to-Peer Delay Mechanism [20] . 15 2.6 PTP Peer-to-Peer Delay Mechanism [20] . 15 2.7 PTP Working Principle [16] . 17 2.8 PTP BMC Working . 19 4.1 RED 670 IEDs . 27 4.2 LDCM, IRIG-B and GTM Modules (left to right order) . 28 4.3 AFS 660 switch . 29 4.4 GPS clock and AFS677 switch . 29 4.5 GPS Antenna . 29 4.6 GPS clock signal relied to all network nodes in the lab . 30 4.7 Oscilloscope . 30 4.8 Communication Media . 31 4.9 Single Phase Relay Tester . 32 4.10 ABB AFS Finder 2.2.0.7 . 33 4.11 Wireshark capturing PTP sync messages . 34 4.12 Sender Application .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Time-Synchronized Data Collection in Smart Grids Through Ipv6 Over
    Time-synchronized Data Collection in Smart Grids through IPv6 over BLE Stanley Nwabuona Markus Schuss Simon Mayer Pro2Future GmbH Graz University of Technology Pro2Future GmbH and Graz Graz, Austria Graz, Austria University of Technology [email protected] [email protected] Graz, Austria [email protected] Konrad Diwold Lukas Krammer Alfred Einfalt Siemens Corporate Siemens Corporate Siemens Corporate Technology Technology Technology Vienna, Austria Vienna, Austria Vienna, Austria [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION For the operation of electrical distribution system an increased Due to the progressing integration of distributed energy re- shift towards smart grid operation can be observed. This shift sources (such as domestic photovoltaics) into the distribution provides operators with a high level of reliability and efficiency grid [5], conventional – mostly passive – monitoring and con- when dealing with highly dynamic distribution grids. Techni- trol schemes of power systems are no longer applicable. This cally, this implies that the support for a bidirectional flow of is because these are not designed to handle and manage the data is critical to realizing smart grid operation, culminating in volatile and dynamic behavior stemming from these new active the demand for equipping grid entities (such as sensors) with grid entities. Therefore, advanced controlling and monitoring communication and processing capabilities. Unfortunately, schemes are required for distribution grid operation (i.e., in- the retrofitting of brown-field electric substations in distribu- cluding in Low-Voltage (LV) grids) to avoid system overload tion grids with these capabilities is not straightforward – this which could incur permanent damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Ieee 802.1 for Homenet
    IEEE802.org/1 IEEE 802.1 FOR HOMENET March 14, 2013 IEEE 802.1 for Homenet 2 Authors IEEE 802.1 for Homenet 3 IEEE 802.1 Task Groups • Interworking (IWK, Stephen Haddock) • Internetworking among 802 LANs, MANs and other wide area networks • Time Sensitive Networks (TSN, Michael David Johas Teener) • Formerly called Audio Video Bridging (AVB) Task Group • Time-synchronized low latency streaming services through IEEE 802 networks • Data Center Bridging (DCB, Pat Thaler) • Enhancements to existing 802.1 bridge specifications to satisfy the requirements of protocols and applications in the data center, e.g. • Security (Mick Seaman) • Maintenance (Glenn Parsons) IEEE 802.1 for Homenet 4 Basic Principles • MAC addresses are “identifier” addresses, not “location” addresses • This is a major Layer 2 value, not a defect! • Bridge forwarding is based on • Destination MAC • VLAN ID (VID) • Frame filtering for only forwarding to proper outbound ports(s) • Frame is forwarded to every port (except for reception port) within the frame's VLAN if it is not known where to send it • Filter (unnecessary) ports if it is known where to send the frame (e.g. frame is only forwarded towards the destination) • Quality of Service (QoS) is implemented after the forwarding decision based on • Priority • Drop Eligibility • Time IEEE 802.1 for Homenet 5 Data Plane Today • 802.1Q today is 802.Q-2011 (Revision 2013 is ongoing) • Note that if the year is not given in the name of the standard, then it refers to the latest revision, e.g. today 802.1Q = 802.1Q-2011 and 802.1D
    [Show full text]
  • 650 Series ANSI DNP3 Communication Protocol Manual
    Relion® Protection and Control 650 series ANSI DNP3 Communication Protocol Manual Document ID: 1MRK 511 257-UUS Issued: June 2012 Revision: A Product version: 1.2 © Copyright 2012 ABB. All rights reserved Copyright This document and parts thereof must not be reproduced or copied without written permission from ABB, and the contents thereof must not be imparted to a third party, nor used for any unauthorized purpose. The software and hardware described in this document is furnished under a license and may be used or disclosed only in accordance with the terms of such license. Trademarks ABB and Relion are registered trademarks of the ABB Group. All other brand or product names mentioned in this document may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Warranty Please inquire about the terms of warranty from your nearest ABB representative. ABB Inc. 1021 Main Campus Drive Raleigh, NC 27606, USA Toll Free: 1-800-HELP-365, menu option #8 ABB Inc. 3450 Harvester Road Burlington, ON L7N 3W5, Canada Toll Free: 1-800-HELP-365, menu option #8 ABB Mexico S.A. de C.V. Paseo de las Americas No. 31 Lomas Verdes 3a secc. 53125, Naucalpan, Estado De Mexico, MEXICO Phone: (+1) 440-585-7804, menu option #8 Disclaimer The data, examples and diagrams in this manual are included solely for the concept or product description and are not to be deemed as a statement of guaranteed properties. All persons responsible for applying the equipment addressed in this manual must satisfy themselves that each intended application is suitable and acceptable, including that any applicable safety or other operational requirements are complied with.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Processor Digital Control System NDC/P39814
    Multi-Processor Digital Control System NDC/P39814 Our digital control system enables success in modern reactive power compensation. The ultimate parallel processing power of the system tops even the most demanding requirements. In the heart of SVC control or Series Capacitor protection, there is no room for errors. Instant response of the system is always based on accurate data measurement and reliable real-time calculations. NDC supports a high order of redundancy with a hot-swapable secondary system. Both systems, primary and secondary, are always up to date with the latest system events and measurements. They are also both synchronised with a common system time with TrueTime GPS. High reliability and performance of our control system ensures maximum availability for your investment. Technical data • Up to four parallel CPUs, 2310 MIPS/CPU • CPU card: MVME5500 • MPC7455 PowerPC® processor 1GHz • 512MB 133 MHz SDRAM • 32MB and 8MB Flash memory • Dual independent 64-bit 66 MHz PCI buses and PMC sites • VME bus • Gigabit Ethernet interface • 10/100BaseTX Ethernet interface • GPS Clock Synchronisation • Fast I/O: - Programmable digital inputs and outputs - AD: 64 x 16 bit @ 10 kHz - DA: 8 x 16 bit @ 10 kHz • Parallel HMI PC units • Data Concentrator / SCADA Gateway • Device Protocols • NDC SW Tool Chain: - INTERBUS - Compiler - EtherCAT - Configurator - IRIG-B - Simulator - IEC-60870-5-101 - System Debugger - IEC-60870-5-104 - Runtime - DNP3.0 - HMI RAD Tool Competence at your service Competence Map • Project Management • Electrical Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • PREVENT DER CHAOS: a Guide to Selecting the Right Communications Protocols for DER Management
    PREVENT DER CHAOS: A Guide to Selecting the Right Communications Protocols for DER Management Published January 2020 DISCLAIMERS Why QualityLogic’s Recommendations QualityLogic occupies a unique role in the development and implementation of communications protocols for DER management by vendors and utilities. Developing and supporting test tools for DER protocols provides an unparalleled knowledge of both the technologies and eco-systems working with the technologies. We have the privilege of advising utilities, vendors, alliances, research labs and regulators on the capabilities and implementation of specific DER protocol standards. We are constantly asked for both training and recommendations for the selection of a standard for specific applications. The increasing interest in the monitoring and management of DER resources begs for the type of analysis and guidance QualityLogic provides in this Guide. These Recommendations are a Starting Point The recommendations contained in this guide are those of QualityLogic and do not represent any other organization, alliance, company or government entity. The Recommendations should be viewed as a starting point and are based on models for use cases and deployment strategies. For specific applications an independent analysis should be conducted which may yield different results. The Recommendations also use a “snapshot” of the current state and adoption of protocols which is subject to change over time and may lead to different results than included here. To find out more about how recommendations were developed, or how to conduct an analyis for your situation contact us at [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT QualityLogic would like to thank our long-time associate, Mark T. Osborn, for his major contribution to this white paper.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE-SA STANDARDS BOARD (SASB) MEETING MINUTES 07 November 2019 IEEE Operations Center, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA 9:00 A.M
    IEEE-SA STANDARDS BOARD (SASB) MEETING MINUTES 07 November 2019 IEEE Operations Center, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Attendees Chair: Gary Hoffman Vice Chair: Ted Burse Past Chair: Jean-Philippe Faure Secretary: Konstantinos Karachalios Members: Stephen Dukes, TAB Rep. Travis Griffith Guido Hiertz Christel Hunter Thomas Koshy John Kulick David Law Joseph Levy Xiaohui Liu Kevin Lu Daleep Mohla Andrew Myles Annette Reilly Dorothy Stanley Philip Winston Howard Wolfman Feng Wu Jingyi Zhou Members Absent: Masayuki Ariyoshi Howard Li Sha Wei Phil Wennblom Joe Koepfinger, Member Emeritus IEEE Staff: Julie Alessi Tina Alston Melissa Aranzamendez Christy Bahn Ian Barbour Adrien Barmaksiz Christina Bellottie Christina Boyce Kim Breitfelder Justin Caso Matthew Ceglia Ravindra Desai Karen Evangelista Josh Gay Jonathan Goldberg Jodi Haasz Mary Ellen Hanntz Yvette Ho Sang Karen Kenney Soo Kim Michael Kipness Vanessa Lalitte Juanita Lewis Greg Marchini Karen McCabe Patrick McCarren Ashley Moran Luigi Napoli Mary Lynne Nielsen Nikoi Nikoi Lauren Rava Dave Ringle, Recording Secretary Pat Roder Anasthasie Sainvilus Gil Santiago Rudi Schubert Sam Sciacca Alpesh Shah Tanya Steinhauser Tom Thompson Lisa Weisser Jonathan Wiggins Malia Zaman Meng Zhao IEEE Outside Legal Counsel: Claire Topp – Dorsey & Whitney LLP IEEE Government Engagement Program on Standards (GEPS) Representatives: Ramy Ahmed Fathy – Egypt, National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA) Simon Hicks – United Kingdom, Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS)
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing an IEEE 1588 V2 on I.MX RT Using Ptpd, Freertos, and Lwip TCP/IP Stack
    NXP Semiconductors Document Number: AN12149 Application Note Rev. 1 , 09/2018 Implementing an IEEE 1588 V2 on i.MX RT Using PTPd, FreeRTOS, and lwIP TCP/IP stack 1. Introduction Contents This application note describes the implementation of 1. Introduction .........................................................................1 the IEEE 1588 V2 Precision Time Protocol (PTP) on 2. IEEE 1588 basic overview ..................................................2 2.1. Synchronization principle ........................................ 3 the i.MX RT MCUs running FreeRTOS OS. The IEEE 2.2. Timestamping ........................................................... 5 1588 standard provides accurate clock synchronization 3. IEEE 1588 functions on i.MX RT .......................................6 for distributed control nodes in industrial automation 3.1. Adjustable timer module .......................................... 6 3.2. Transmit timestamping ............................................. 8 applications. 3.3. Receive timestamping .............................................. 8 3.4. Time synchronization ............................................... 8 The implementation runs on the i.MX RT10xx 3.5. Input capture and output compare block .................. 8 Evaluation Kit (EVK) board with i.MX RT10xx MCUs. 4. IEEE 1588 implementation for i.MX RT ............................9 The demo software is based on the NXP MCUXpresso 4.1. Hardware components .............................................. 9 4.2. Software components ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mgate W5108/W5208 Series Modbus/DNP3 Gateway User's
    MGate W5108/W5208 Series Modbus/DNP3 Gateway User’s Manual Edition 3.0, December 2017 www.moxa.com/product © 2017 Moxa Inc. All rights reserved. MGate W5108/W5208 Series Modbus/DNP3 Gateway User’s Manual The software described in this manual is furnished under a license agreement and may be used only in accordance with the terms of that agreement. Copyright Notice © 2017 Moxa Inc. All rights reserved. Trademarks The MOXA logo is a registered trademark of Moxa Inc. All other trademarks or registered marks in this manual belong to their respective manufacturers. Disclaimer Information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Moxa. Moxa provides this document as is, without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, its particular purpose. Moxa reserves the right to make improvements and/or changes to this manual, or to the products and/or the programs described in this manual, at any time. Information provided in this manual is intended to be accurate and reliable. However, Moxa assumes no responsibility for its use, or for any infringements on the rights of third parties that may result from its use. This product might include unintentional technical or typographical errors. Changes are periodically made to the information herein to correct such errors, and these changes are incorporated into new editions of the publication. Technical Support Contact Information www.moxa.com/support Moxa Americas Moxa China (Shanghai office) Toll-free: 1-888-669-2872 Toll-free: 800-820-5036 Tel: +1-714-528-6777 Tel: +86-21-5258-9955 Fax: +1-714-528-6778 Fax: +86-21-5258-5505 Moxa Europe Moxa Asia-Pacific Tel: +49-89-3 70 03 99-0 Tel: +886-2-8919-1230 Fax: +49-89-3 70 03 99-99 Fax: +886-2-8919-1231 Moxa India Tel: +91-80-4172-9088 Fax: +91-80-4132-1045 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ECSO State of the Art Syllabus V1 ABOUT ECSO
    STATE OF THE ART SYLLABUS Overview of existing Cybersecurity standards and certification schemes WG1 I Standardisation, certification, labelling and supply chain management JUNE 2017 ECSO State of the Art Syllabus v1 ABOUT ECSO The European Cyber Security Organisation (ECSO) ASBL is a fully self-financed non-for-profit organisation under the Belgian law, established in June 2016. ECSO represents the contractual counterpart to the European Commission for the implementation of the Cyber Security contractual Public-Private Partnership (cPPP). ECSO members include a wide variety of stakeholders across EU Member States, EEA / EFTA Countries and H2020 associated countries, such as large companies, SMEs and Start-ups, research centres, universities, end-users, operators, clusters and association as well as European Member State’s local, regional and national administrations. More information about ECSO and its work can be found at www.ecs-org.eu. Contact For queries in relation to this document, please use [email protected]. For media enquiries about this document, please use [email protected]. Disclaimer The document was intended for reference purposes by ECSO WG1 and was allowed to be distributed outside ECSO. Despite the authors’ best efforts, no guarantee is given that the information in this document is complete and accurate. Readers of this document are encouraged to send any missing information or corrections to the ECSO WG1, please use [email protected]. This document integrates the contributions received from ECSO members until April 2017. Cybersecurity is a very dynamic field. As a result, standards and schemes for assessing Cybersecurity are being developed and updated frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Product and Solutions Guide
    PRODUCT AND SOLUTION GUIDE +1.509.332.1890 [email protected] selinc.com Making Electric Power Safer, More Reliable, and More Economical 385-0080 2021 Technology Highlights Example Popular Models for the SEL-2411P Pump Automation Controller For a complete popular models listing, visit selinc.com/products/popular Select models typically ship in 2 days Application Details Item No. Price Ultra-High-Speed Protection Capacitor Bank Control Advanced Generator Protection Meet the SEL-T401L Ultra-High-Speed Enhance your distribution system Provide advanced generator, bus, trans- Line Relay, which combines time-domain using the new SEL-734W Capacitor former, and auxiliary system protection Simplex, duplex, and triplex pump control for float switch level control 2411#GJ44 $2,130 USD technologies and high-performance Bank Control with wireless current for hydro, thermal, and pumped-storage and integration with SCADA. distance elements for a complete pro- sensors to improve power quality. applications with the new SEL-400G. tection and monitoring system. Simplex, duplex, and triplex pump control for float switch level control 2411#BGCG $2,490 USD and/or analog level control and integration with SCADA. Fault Transmitter and Receiver Synchrowave® Operations Time-Domain Link (TiDL®) Technology Apply the SEL-FT50 and SEL-FR12 Software Convert data using a TiDL merging unit and Simplex, duplex, and triplex pump control for float switch level control and/or analog level control, integration with SCADA, and ac voltage 2411#M9HF $2,700 USD Fault Transmitter and Receiver System Increase grid safety and reliability transport them via fiber to as many as four phase monitoring with diagnostic waveform event reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Network Design Techniques for Safety System Applications at Nuclear Power Plants
    Secure Network Design Techniques for Safety System Applications at Nuclear Power Plants A Letter Report to the U.S. NRC September 20, 2010 Prepared by: John T. Michalski, Francis J. Wyant, David Duggan, Aura Morris, Phillip Campbell, John Clem, Raymond Parks, Luis Martinez, and Munawar Merza Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 5800 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 Prepared for: Paul Rebstock, NRC Program Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Division of Engineering Digital Instrumentation & Control Branch Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. NRC Job Code: JCN N6116 i Abstract This report describes a comprehensive best practice approach to the design and protection of a modern digital nuclear power plant data network (NPPDN). The important network security elements associated with the design, operation, and protection of the NPPDN are presented. This report includes an examination and discussion of newer proposed designs of modern Digital Safety Systems architectures and their potential design and operational vulnerabilities. The report explains the security issues associated with a modern NPPDN design and suggests mitigations, where appropriate, to enhance network security. Reference and discussion of the application of relevant regulatory guidance for each of the topics are also included. ii Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... ix 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Common Industrial Protocol) Over Ethernet
    © 2018 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public BRKIOT-2112 Securing the Internet of Things Philippe Roggeband, Manager GSSO EMEAR Business Development Cisco Spark Questions? Use Cisco Spark to communicate with the speaker after the session How 1. Find this session in the Cisco Live Mobile App 2. Click “Join the Discussion” 3. Install Spark or go directly to the space 4. Enter messages/questions in the space cs.co/ciscolivebot#BRKIOT-2112 © 2018 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public The IoT pillars While these pillars represent disparate technology, purposes, and challenges, what they all share are the vulnerabilities that IoT devices introduce. Information Technology Operations Technology Consumer Technology It’s not just about the “things” BRKIOT-2112 © 2018 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public 6 BRKIOT-2112 © 2018 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public 7 Agenda • Challenges and Constraints • Specific threats and Protection mechanisms • Cisco best practices and solutions • Q&A • Conclusion Agenda • Challenges and Constraints • Specific threats and Protection mechanisms • Cisco best practices and solutions • Q&A • Conclusion Consumer IoT Characteristics Consumer objects Challenges and constraints • These devices are highly constrained in terms of • Physical size, Inexpensive • CPU power, Memory, Bandwidth • Autonomous operation in the field • Power consumption is critical • If it is battery powered then energy efficiency is paramount, batteries might have to last for years • Some level of remote management is required • Value often linked to a Cloud platform or Service BRKIOT-2112 © 2018 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]