Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 107 8 Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions Roberto Maroldi, Marco Berlucchi, Davide Farina, Davide Tomenzoli, Andrea Borghesi, and Luca Pianta
CONTENTS 8.6.6 Follow-Up 131 8.7 Juvenile Angiofi broma 131 8.1 Osteoma 107 8.7.1 Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth 131 8.1.1 Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth 107 8.7.2 Clinical and Endoscopic Findings 132 8.1.2 Clinical and Endoscopic Findings 108 8.7.3 Treatment Guidelines 132 8.1.3 Treatment Guidelines 108 8.7.4 Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging 133 8.1.4 Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging 109 8.7.5 Imaging Findings 133 8.1.5 Imaging Findings 109 8.7.6 Follow-Up 141 8.1.6 Follow-Up 110 8.8 Pyogenic Granuloma 8.2 Fibrous Dysplasia and Ossifying Fibroma 110 (Lobular Capillary Hemangioma) 145 8.2.1 Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth 110 8.8.1 Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth 145 8.2.2 Clinical and Endoscopic Findings 111 8.8.2 Treatment Guidelines 145 8.2.3 Treatment Guidelines 112 8.8.3 Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging 146 8.2.4 Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging 112 8.8.4 Imaging Findings 146 8.2.5 Imaging Findings 112 8.9 Unusual Benign Lesions 147 8.2.6 Follow-Up 114 8.9.1 Pleomorphic Adenoma (Mixed Tumor) 147 8.3 Aneurysmal Bone Cyst 114 8.9.2 Schwannoma 149 8.3.1 Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth 114 8.9.3 Leiomyoma 150 8.3.2 Clinical and Endoscopic Findings 115 8.9.4 Paraganglioma 151 8.3.3 Treatment Guidelines 115 References 152 8.3.4 Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging 115 8.3.5 Imaging Findings 115 8.3.6 Follow-Up 116 8.4 Sinonasal Mucocele 117 8.4.1 Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth 117 8.1 8.4.2 Clinical and Endoscopic Findings 117 Osteoma 8.4.3 Treatment Guidelines 117 8.4.4 Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging 118 8.4.5 Imaging Findings 118 8.1.1 8.4.6 Follow-Up 121 Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth 8.5 Abnormal Sinus Pneumatization 121 8.5.1 Defi nition and Epidemiology 121 Osteoma is a benign, slow-growing osteoblastic tu- 8.5.2 Pathogenesis 121 mor, more commonly located in the outer table of the 8.5.3 Clinical and Endoscopic Findings 121 8.5.4 Treatment Guidelines 122 calvarium, the mandible, the paranasal sinuses, and 8.5.5 Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging 122 occasionally in tubular bones (Samy and Mostafa 8.5.6 Imaging Findings 122 1971; Kransdorf et al. 1991; Sayan et al. 2002). 8.6 Inverted Papilloma and Other It is the most frequent benign tumor of the nose Schneiderian Papillomas 122 and sinonasal, since being found in 1% of patients 8.6.1 Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth 122 8.6.2 Clinical and Endoscopic Findings 124 who undergo plain sinus radiographs and in 3% of 8.6.3 Treatment Guidelines 125 CT examinations obtained for sinonasal symptoms 8.6.4 Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging 126 (Earwaker 1993). Osteoma usually presents between 8.6.5 Imaging Findings 126 the third and sixth decade of life, with a male pre- dominance of 1.5–2.6:1 (Metha and Grewal 1963; R. Maroldi, Professor, MD; D. Farina, MD; A. Borghesi, MD Atallah and Jay 1981). About 80% of osteomas oc- Department of Radiology University of Brescia, Piazzale cur in the frontal sinus, while ethmoid and maxillary Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy Earwaker M. Berlucchi, MD; D. Tomenzoli, MD; L. Pianta, MD sinus are affected in about 20% of cases ( Department of Otorhinolaryngology University of Brescia, 1993). Isolated cases of sphenoid osteoma have been Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy observed (Fu and Perzin 1974). 108 R. Maroldi et al.
Histologically, osteomas are divided into three Signs and symptoms of orbital or lacrymal pathway categories: (1) the ivory or “eburnated” osteoma is involvement (i.e., proptosis or exophthalmos, chemo- composed of hard, dense bone, lacking a haversian sis, diplopia, orbital pain, epiphora, decreased visual system and containing only a minimal amount of acuity, and even transient blindness) may be observed fi brous tissue; (2) the osteoma spongiosum (mature in large size lesions. Intracranial extension may be as- osteoma) contains more trabecular tissue and often sociated with complications such as CSF leak, menin- marrow component. It is surrounded by mature can- gitis, brain abscess, pneumocephalus, seizures, hemi- cellous bone with small haversian systems; (3) the paresis, and bitemporal quadrantanopsia (Bartlett mixed osteoma contains both aspects of ivory and 1971; Hartwidge and Va r m a 1984; Huneidi and mature subtypes (Fu and Perzin 1974). Afshar 1989; Rappaport and Attia 1994). The etiology of the lesion is still unknown and In most cases, endoscopic evaluation of patients with speculative. Three main hypotheses have been osteoma is completely negative, the tumor being located proposed: (1) the embryologic theory, which pos- inside a paranasal sinus. Displacement of nasal struc- tulates that osteoma arises at the junction be- tures, such as the middle turbinate or the medial maxil- tween the embryonic cartilaginous ethmoid and lary wall in case of an ethmoid or maxillary osteoma, the membranous frontal bones, does not explain respectively, may be observed. Direct visualization of the large number of osteomas located far from the the tumor is infrequent, occurring in large osteomas fronto-ethmoid junction; (2) the traumatic theory occupying the nasal fossa: the lesion appears as a fi rm identifies a previous trauma as the possible patho- mass covered by normal or atrophic mucosa. genetic event; (3) the infective theory is related to the concomitant observation of osteoma and rhi- nosinusitis in about 30% of patients. Other theo- 8.1.3 ries consider osteomas osteodysplastic lesions, Treatment Guidelines osteogenic hamartomas, embryonic bone rests, or as the result of sinus polyp ossification (Namdar Treatment of asymptomatic osteomas is controver- et al. 1998). sial: some authors suggest tumor removal regard- Osteomas can occur in conjunction with Gardner’s less of size, whereas others recommend a “wait and syndrome, which is characterized by the association see” policy with serial CT scan controls (Savic and of osteomas with intestinal polyposis and multiple Djeric 1990; Brodish et al. 1999). soft tissue tumors, such as dermoid cysts and fi bro- Namdar et al. (1998) suggested the following mas (Atallah and Jay 1981). guidelines for treatment: in case of associated nasal Osteomas of the paranasal sinuses are often as- obstruction or rhinosinusitis, medical therapy with ymptomatic and may be serendipitously detected on antibiotics, decongestants, and steroids may be appro- routine radiologic examinations. Furthermore, tu- priate. Whenever medical therapy fails because of tu- mor growth is slow and occasionally characterized by mor location, the lesion is adjacent to frontal sinus os- a tendency to displace and compress the surround- tium or more than 50% of the frontal sinus is occupied, ing structures (about 10% of cases). Intracranial and or a noticeable increase in size has been documented intraorbital extent of sinus osteomas may occur as a by serial CT scans, surgery is recommended. Finally, late event (Rappaport and Attia 1994; Namdar et chronic headache may be an indication for surgery al. 1998; Huang et al. 2001). when other causes are excluded. Removal of the lesion may alternatively require a microendoscopic procedure or an external approach, 8.1.2 in relation to tumor location, volume, and extension. Clinical and Endoscopic Findings Schick et al. (2001) precisely defi ned the limits and the indications for a microendoscopic removal: while Frontal headache or facial pain, depending on tumor most ethmoid osteomas can be resected endonasally, location, are the most frequently reported symptoms. frontal osteomas are considered to be accessible Pain is presumably due to pressure caused by tumor whenever located medial to a virtual sagittal plane expansion, to an acute or chronic sinusitis secondary upward prolonging the lamina papyracea and origi- to sinus ostium blockage, or to a secondary mucocele nating from the inferior aspect of the posterior fron- (Lieberman and Tovi 1984; Manaka et al. 1998). tal sinus wall. Microendoscopic removal of frontal Nasal obstruction and mucopurulent rhinorrhea are sinus osteomas can be achieved through Draf’s type rarely present. II or III frontal sinusotomy. Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 109
Tumor extension beyond the paranasal sinuses, on CT scans – of a radiodense mass occupying the or large osteomas which can not be entirely exposed frontal sinus (more commonly) or, less frequently, the through the nose must be removed via an external ethmoid or maxillary sinus (Gillman et al. 1997). approach (Smith and Calcaterra 1989; Namdar According to the amount of mineralized bone within et al. 1998; Brodish et al. 1999; Schick et al. 2001). the lesion, osteomas may exhibit very high density, Osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy (with or without fat resembling cortical bone, or a gradually decreasing obliteration), with a coronal or uni-/bilateral brow X-ray opacity/density to a “ground-glass” pattern incision, allows direct access to the frontal sinus and (Fig. 8.1). All different patterns can be found at once removal of osteomas with anterior and/or posterior in the same lesion (Som and Brandwein 1996). No wall involvement. Craniofacial resection has been enhancement is to be expected; nonetheless, contrast described for the removal of giant fronto-ethmoid administration is normally unnecessary to obtain a osteomas with intracranial complications (Blitzer diagnosis. MR is intrinsically inferior to CT in imag- et al. 1989). ing osteomas, as both the low water content and the lack of mobile protons within osteomas result in very low signal intensity in all sequences. The possible 8.1.4 presence of small amounts of fat tissue within the Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging intertrabecular spaces may result in the detection of scattered hyperintense foci on both T1 and T2 se- Location, extent, and site of origin quences (Rao et al. 2001). The differential diagnosis Potential impairment of drainage pathways includes osteoblastoma, osteosarcoma, and fi brous Extension beyond paranasal sinuses dysplasia, calcifi ed hematoma being just an anec- Position in respect to the lamina papyracea and dotal alternative (Huang and Misko 1998). On CT, inferior and posterior frontal sinus wall (endona- high density, well-defi ned borders, lack of contrast sal accessibility) enhancement and lytic bone destruction, are gener- Presence of possible complications (intracranial ally suffi cient clues to suggest a correct diagnosis. and/or intraorbital) In addition, osteomas are generally confi ned to the sinus of origin. Obstruction of mucus drainage path- ways (particularly the frontal recess) is the more fre- 8.1.5 quent concern in sinonasal osteomas (Fig. 8.2). High Imaging Findings quality CT multiplanar reconstructions – obtained with multidetector equipment – may be necessary Diagnosis of Osteoma is generally simple diagnosis, to precisely identify the sinusal wall from which the based on the detection – either on X-ray fi lms or lesion arises, to fully depict course and patency of
a b
Fig. 8.1a,b. Frontal sinus osteomas. Plain CT on coronal plane, in two different patients. a A large frontal osteoma is detected, implanted on left sinus fl oor. No indirect signs of drainage impairment are observed. b The osteoma adheres to both fl oor and roof of frontal sinus in the most dependent part of the cavity. Arrow points to mucosal thickening or retained secretions secondary to sinus drainage blockage 110 R. Maroldi et al.
a b
Fig. 8.2a,b. Fronto-ethmoidal osteoma. Plain CT on coronal (a) and sagittal reformatted plane (b). a A large fronto-ethmoidal osteoma exhibits a mixed pattern, ivory in its lateral part, ground glass in the medial portion. Lamina papyracea is encroached. The lesion contacts the medial rectus muscle (arrowhead). b Unexpectedly, sagittal reformation demonstrates patency of the frontal recess, all along its course (black and white arrows)
all sinus paths, and to correctly assess the integrity dysplasia is a developmental anomaly of the bone- of thin bony walls such as the lamina papyracea or forming mesenchyme with a defect in osteoblastic the cribriform plate. differentiation and maturation and the tendency of stabilize after puberty, whereas ossifying fi broma is a true benign neoplasm with varying aggressiveness 8.1.6 depending on the clinical form (Marvel et al. 1991). Follow-Up They will both be discussed in this chapter since they share very similar radiologic fi ndings. Osteomas do not show a propensity to recur after radical excision (Smith and Calcaterra 1989). Patients not undergoing surgery or having incom- 8.2.1 plete tumor removal require periodical radiologic Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth evaluations (Atallah and Jay 1981; Spencer and Mitchell 1987; Koiuvnen et al. 1997). The maximal Fibrous dysplasia is a non-neoplastic, slowly pro- rate of growth of osteoma is observed during the pe- gressing disorder of unknown etiology. The disease riod of skeletal development: for this reason, growth is characterized by resorption of normal bony tis- of untreated or residual lesions is much slower when sue, which is replaced by fi brous tissue and im- skeletal growth is completed. mature woven bone histologically corresponding to different stages of bone metaplasia (Simovic et al. 1996; Commins et al. 1998). Several causes (i.e., endocrine anomalies, trauma, defects of bone 8.2 growth, development from a hamartoma) have been Fibrous Dysplasia and Ossifying Fibroma suggested to explain fi brous dysplasia pathogenesis (Lichtenstein and Jaffe 1942; Pound et al. 1965; Fibrous dysplasia and ossifying fi broma are two Smith 1965), but to date none of them has been clearly distinct diseases. For a long period, they have widely accepted. been considered as different varieties of the same Ossifying fi broma is a slow-growing benign neo- disease, but since 1963, they have been differenti- plasm composed of a fi broblastic and osseous compo- ated into two separate entities (Reed 1963). Fibrous nent (Shanmugaratnam 1991), which is considered Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 111 to arise from mesenchymal blast cells giving origin to tients. The polyostotic form is characterized by mul- the periodontal ligament (Hamner et al. 1968). tiple lesions involving several bones and accounts Both fi brous dysplasia and ossifying fi broma are for approximately 30% of cases. This type occurs more common in females than in males. Fibrous earlier than the monostotic form and involves head dysplasia is usually diagnosed within the fi rst two and neck structures in 50% of patients. The dissemi- decades of life (Commins et al. 1998; Muraoka et nated form, also called McCune-Albright syndrome, al. 2001), whereas ossifying fi broma have been more is the most rare and prevalently involves young girls. frequently observed in the third and fourth decades It presents with multiple lesions and extraskeletal (Hamner et al. 1968; Eversole et al. 1985), and a manifestations such as cutaneous and mucosal pig- higher incidence has been reported in the black mentation, and endocrine abnormalities (i.e., sexual population (Harrison and Lund 1993). The head precocity, growth hormone, and prolactin hyperse- and neck area is involved in 25% of cases of fi brous cretion) (Pacini et al. 1987). dysplasia (Brodish et al. 1999); maxilla and man- A clinical variant of ossifying fi broma, called dible are the most frequently affected sites, followed “juvenile ossifying fi broma,” is more frequently ob- by frontal, parietal, and occipital bones (Nager et al. served in the sinonasal tract, where it predominantly 1982). The molar and premolar periapical regions of affects male subjects (Johnson et al. 1991; El-Mofty the mandible and maxilla are the most frequently 2002). It usually belongs to the cementiform type and involved sites by ossifying fi broma (Hamner et is considered to have an aggressive biological behav- al. 1968; Schmaman et al. 1970; Waldron and ior, mimicking a malignant neoplasm (Marvel et al. Ginsanti 1973; Eversole et al. 1985; Hyams et al. 1991). 1988; Slootweg et al. 1994; Su et al. 1997). The de- velopment of the lesion in the sinonasal tract distant from dental alveoli has been explained by the pres- 8.2.2 ence of primitive mesenchymal cell rests, ectopic Clinical and Endoscopic Findings periodontal rests, or by an incomplete migration of the medial part of the nasal anlage (Krausen et al. Clinical features of fi brous dysplasia and ossifying fi - 1977; Fujimoto et al. 1987). broma are aspecifi c and determined by a submucosal Histologically, fi brous dysplasia may be divided slow expansion. A diagnostic delay of up to 10 years into three groups (active form, potentially active form, has been reported for ossifying fi broma (Boysen et inactive form) in relation to the number of mitoses, al. 1979). cellular matrix, and osseous component (Stamm et Even though painless facial and skull deformities al. 2000). Sarcomatous transformation is a rare event, are the most frequently observed signs, symptoms which occurs in about 0.5% of patients and is usu- such as nasal obstruction, headache, epistaxis, an- ally related to previous radiotherapy (Schwartz and osmia, loosening of teeth, facial paralysis, hearing Alpert 1964). loss, trigeminal neuralgia-like pain, and recurrent There are two main histological variants of os- rhinosinusitis due to drainage impairment may sifying fi broma: the classic and the cementiform or develop (Bollen et al. 1990; Camilleri 1991; psammomatoid (Shanmugaratnam 1991). The Ferguson 1994; Slootweg et al. 1994; Wenig et al. latter is characterized by round calcifi c masses re- 1995; Redaelli De Zinis et al. 1996; Chong and sembling psammomatoid bodies of meningiomas Tang 1997; Commins et al. 1998; Muraoka et al. (Shanmugaratnam 1991). 2001; Cheng et al. 2002). Diplopia, proptosis, loss From the histological point of view, fi brous dys- of visual acuity due to optic nerve compression, plasia and ossifying fi broma have similar histological epiphora, limitation of ocular motility are other im- features but the former does not have a capsule and portant symptoms and signs indicating an involve- is characterized by a more immature bone without ment of the orbit and/or of the lacrymal pathways osteoblastic activity (Hyams et al. 1988). (Moore et al. 1985; Osguthorpe and Gudeman In 1968, Ramsey et al. suggested classifying fi - 1987; Johnson et al. 1991; Slootweg et al. 1994; brous dysplasia into three forms: monostotic, poly- Wenig et al. 1995; Redaelli De Zinis et al. 1996). ostotic, and disseminated. The fi rst one, which af- Since both diseases display a submucosal pattern of fects a single osseous site, is the most common growth, nasal endoscopy is often negative or shows type (accounting for 70% of cases) and generally a lesion covered by intact mucosa. regresses with puberty. Craniofacial involvement is usually unilateral and occurs in about 30% of pa- 112 R. Maroldi et al.
8.2.3 Relationships with adjacent structures, particu- Treatment Guidelines larly with the orbit, internal carotid artery, optic nerve, cavernous sinus, middle and anterior cra- The management of fi brous dysplasia may be delayed nial fossa when the patient is asymptomatic; vice versa, when Evidence of sarcomatous transformation (fi brous clinical manifestations occur, surgical treatment is re- dysplasia) quired. However, one should keep in mind that radi- cal excision is not the fi rst goal of surgery, which is instead meant to relieve symptoms. Selection of the surgical technique and extension of the resection de- pend on the site and size of the lesion, its closeness 8.2.5 to vital structures (i.e., internal carotid artery, op- Imaging Findings tic nerve, orbital cavity, middle and anterior cranial fossa), age of the patient, severity of signs and symp- Imaging fi ndings of fi brous dysplasia refl ect the toms, and possibility of sarcomatous degeneration pathophysiology of this lesion, (i.e., focal or complete (Kessler et al. 1998; Stamm et al. 2000). Although replacement of medullary bone by woven fi broosse- external approaches (Simovic et al. 1996; Commins ous tissue.) As a general rule, the cortex is unaffected et al. 1998; Muraoka et al. 2001) have been exten- by this process (Kransdorf et al. 1990; Som and sively used, recently some authors reported anecdotal Lidov 1992). cases treated through a more conservative transna- The degree of mineralization of the tissue will de- sal microendoscopic approach (Kessler et al. 1998; termine radiographic and CT density of fi brous dys- Brodish et al. 1999; Pasquini et al. 2002). plasia. This may range from radiolucent, diffi cult to Radiotherapy is strongly contraindicated due to differentiate from a simple bone cyst (particularly in the risk of malignant transformation. Other factors, the monostotic form of the disease), to ground glass which should discourage its use, are a poor radiosen- (equal proportions of fi brous and osseous tissue), sitivity and its negative effects on the growth centers or even sclerotic (predominance of dense osseous in young patients. tissue) (Kransdorf et al. 1990; Wenig et al. 1995) Based on the concept that fi brous dysplasia is (Figs. 8.3, 8.4). related to an excess of osteoclastic activity, some MR signal on SE T2 sequence is rather vari- authors reported successful results using bisphos- able. Fibrous dysplasia has been reported as hav- phonates, a well-known family of drugs that inhibit ing overall hypointense signal and cystic/necrotic osteoclast reabsorption (Liens et al. 1994; Lane et hyperintense areas (Casselman et al. 1993; Som al. 2001). and Lidov 1992), but also hyper- or isointense sig- Ossifying fi broma requires radical excision, which nal as compared to subcutaneous fat tissue (Utz can be obtained by a simple microendoscopic ap- et al. 1989). SE T1 signal is unanimously reported proach (London et al. 2002) or can require, in very as hypointense (Som and Lidov 1992; Utz et al. large lesions, even an anterior craniofacial resection 1989; Kransdorf et al. 1990); non-homogeneous (Redaelli De Zinis et al. 1996). Aggressive surgery enhancement may be obtained after contrast ad- is justifi ed by the high percentage of recurrences, ministration. which has been estimated to account for approxi- As the amount of fi brous tissue within the lesion mately 30% in a large series of patients including progressively increases, expansile remodeling of all anatomic sites (Johnson et al. 1991). If only the the affected bone can occur (Fig. 8.5). In the max- ethmoid is considered, the overall recurrence rate is illo-facial area, this may result in encroachment of around 44% (Redaelli De Zinis et al. 1996). optic canal and skull base foramina and fi ssures (Sterling et al. 1993), entailing the risk of poten- tially severe neurologic complications (Commins et 8.2.4 al. 1998). Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging Imaging fi ndings are usually insuffi cient to pre- cisely discriminate between fi brous dysplasia and Location of the disease (in fi brous dysplasia ossifying fi broma. As for fi brous dysplasia, CT den- monostotic, polyostotic, and disseminated forms sity ranges between radiolucency (Engelbrecht et must be accurately differentiated) al. 1999), ground glass (Sterling et al. 1993), and Assessment of lesion extent sclerosis (Marvel et al. 1991). Nonetheless, in most Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 113
a b Fig. 8.3a,b. Fibrous dysplasia. Plain CT on coronal plane, in two different patients. a Lesion involves both the right frontal and ethmoid bone. Note expansion of crista galli and middle turbinate, the latter contralaterally displacing the nasal septum. b Monostotic form involves the sphenoid bone, expanding the left pterygoid root and laminae. Note initial narrowing of both foramen rotundum (white arrow) and vidian canal (black arrowheads), at its anterior opening
a b c
Fig. 8.4a–c. Fibrous dysplasia. Plain CT on axial (a) and coronal plane (b,c). Polyostotic form of the disease involves the tem- poral, sphenoid, frontal, maxillary, and palatine bone. Note the different degrees of mineralization of the expanded medullary cavities, ranging from ivory (temporal bone), to ground glass (sphenoid) and radiolucent (maxillary) appearance. Vidian canal, indicated by black arrow on the left, is not detected on the affected site (white arrow)
a b
Fig. 8.5a,b. Fibrous dysplasia. Plain CT (a), SE T2 (b) on axial plane. a At CT, a high density ground glass lesion is detected in an 8-year-old boy with right proptosis. The right ethmoidal mass appears non-homogeneously hypointense on T2. The lesion abuts the right orbit, with no signs of invasion present (arrows) 114 R. Maroldi et al.
cases ossifying fi broma is reported as a multilocu- crinologic evaluation at 6-month intervals is recom- lated lesion, bordered by a peripheral eggshell-like mended in patients affected by McCune-Albright dense rim (Han et al. 1991). Whether the outer rim syndrome (Uzun et al. 1999). is a proliferating part of the tumor or just reactive hyperostosis is a matter of debate in the literature. At MR, ossifying fi broma shows hyperintensity on T2 sequence, whereas its T1 pattern consists of inter- 8.3 mediate-to-hyperintense signal in the central part Aneurysmal Bone Cyst combined with hypointensity of the outer shell. The latter strongly enhances after paramagnetic con- 8.3.1 trast administration (Fig. 8.6), a fi nding impossible Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth to appreciate at CT due to the bone-like density of this component of the lesion. Aneurysmal bone cyst is a benign bone lesion char- Better than a density/signal pattern, the site of the acterized by several sponge-like, blood- or serum- lesion may sometimes help to rule out a differential fi lled, generally non-endothelialized spaces of vari- diagnosis. Isolated sphenoid or temporal bone le- ous diameters. The fi rst description dates back to the sions as well as diffuse craniofacial involvement bet- early 1940s (Jaffe and Lichtenstein 1942), but only ter apply to fi brous dysplasia, whereas the suspicion in 1950 was the term aneurysmal bone cyst intro- of ossifying fi broma is raised in the presence of zygo- duced by Lichtenstein (1950). However, the term matic or mandibular tumor. Fronto-ethmoid lesions seems to be inaccurate, since the lesion is neither are, conversely, rather unpredictable (Som and Lidov a true aneurysm nor a cyst. Several hypotheses on 1992). the pathogenesis of aneurysmal bone cyst have been proposed. These include: (1) alterations of local os- seous hemodynamics with elevated venous pressure 8.2.6 (Lichtenstein 1950); (2) predisposing factors such Follow-Up as trauma (Levy et al. 1975); (3) local thrombosis of veins and arterovenous malformations (Bernier Since complete resection of fi brous dysplasia is very and Bhasker 1958); (4) vascular alterations due to diffi cult to achieve and the recurrence rate ranges a preexisting bony disorder (i.e., angioma, chondro- from 25% to 75% (Ramsey et al. 1968), it is manda- blastoma, chondromyxoid fi broma, fi brosarcoma, tory to follow patients every 6 months during the fi brous dysplasia, giant cell tumor, hemangioendo- fi rst year after surgery and, subsequently, every year. thelioma, histiocytoma, nonossifying fi broma, non- Moreover, an ophthalmologic, neurologic, and endo- osteogenic fi broma, osteoblastoma, osteoclastoma,
a b
Fig. 8.6a,b. Ossifying fi broma. Gd-DTPA SE T1 on coronal (a) and sagittal (b) plane. Huge, brightly enhancing ethmoido-maxillary mass encroaching both the nasal septum (black arrowhead) and the anterior cranial fossa fl oor (white arrow). Medial orbital wall is laterally displaced (black ar- row) but not invaded Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 115 osteosarcoma, unicameral bone cyst). (Citardi et al. Physical examination generally shows a submuco- 1996; Kransdorf and Sweet 1995; Buraczewski sal expansile lesion with different location (maxilla, and Dabska 1971) medial ocular canthus, frontal bone, cheek) depend- Aneurysmal bone cyst is slightly more frequent in ing on the site of origin (Patel et al. 1993; Citardi et females and develops in about 90% of patients during al. 1996; Suzuki et al. 2001). the fi rst two decades of life (Jaffe and Lichtenstein Nasal endoscopy may reveal only a mild mucosal 1942; Calliauw et al. 1985). Most lesions involve congestion of the lateral nasal wall. In other cases, it long bone metaphyses, vertebrae, and pelvis, whereas shows a fl eshy mass in the nasal cavity or a pinkish the occurrence in the head and neck area is sporadic bulging of the medial wall of the maxillary sinus with (2%). The mandible and maxilla are involved in 66% secondary defl ection of the nasal septum (Hady et and 33% of cases, respectively, while rarely aneurys- al. 1990; Som et al. 1991; Patel et al. 1993; Pasquini mal bone cyst has been observed in the orbitoethmoid et al. 2002). complex (Citardi et al. 1996; Chateil et al. 1997). As described by Buraczewski and Dabska (1971), the development of aneurysmal bone cyst fol- 8.3.3 lows three different stages: the initial phase (I stage), Treatment Guidelines which is characterized by osteolysis without peculiar fi ndings; the growth phase (II stage), showing a rapid Although several alternative options such as curet- increase in size with osseous erosion and enlarge- tage with or without bone grafting, cryotherapy in ment of involved bone associated with formation association with surgery, intratumoral sclerotherapy, of a shell around the central part of the lesion; the and local injection of calcitonin have been advocated, stabilization phase (III stage), with a fully developed radical surgical excision must be considered the treat- radiological pattern. ment of choice (Kimmelman et al. 1982; Hady et al. Histologically, aneurysmal bone cyst is classi- 1990; Chartrand-Lefebvre et al. 1996; Citardi et fi ed into two variants. The classic form, which is the al. 1996; De Minteguiaga et al. 2001). Whenever most common (about 95% of cases), is composed possible, performing radical surgery instead of cu- of blood-fi lled clefts among bony trabeculae as- rettage is mandatory since the recurrence rate af- sociated with osteoid tissue in the stromal ma- ter complete excision is indeed very low. Different trix (Kershisnik and Batsakis 1994). The solid surgical approaches ranging from minimally inva- form, which affects 5% of patients, is characterized sive endoscopic treatment (De Minteguiaga et al. by osteoid production, fi broblastic proliferation, 2001; Pasquini et al. 2002) to external techniques and degenerated calcifying fi bromyxoid elements (Kimmelman et al. 1982; Hady et al. 1990; Som et (Sankerkin et al. 1983). al. 1991; Patel et al. 1993) have been employed in relation to the site and extent of the lesion. In view of the possible occurrence of post-irradia- 8.3.2 tion sarcomas (Tillman et al. 1968), radiotherapy is Clinical and Endoscopic Findings contraindicated.
In the initial phase, the lesion may be asymptomatic or may cause aspecifi c symptoms. Subsequently, pa- 8.3.4 tients usually complain of local pain, nasal obstruc- Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging tion, epistaxis, headache, and progressive anosmia. Moreover, different ocular signs and symptoms (i.e., Site, extent, and vascularization of the lesion epiphora, recurrent dacryocystitis, blurry vision, Involvement of the surrounding structures (i.e. proptosis, diplopia, alteration of the extraocular orbital cavity, cranial fossa) motility, central scotomas, decreased visual acuity, Concomitant presence of other osseous lesions retroorbital headache, and even blindness) may oc- cur (Kimmelman et al. 1982; Som et al. 1991; Patel et al. 1993; Citardi et al. 1996; Chateil et al. 1997; 8.3.5 Saito et al. 1998; Pasquini et al. 2002). Very rarely Imaging Findings the lesion can present with meningitis and/or pneu- mocephalus due to intradural extension (Saito et Imaging fi ndings of aneurysmal bone cyst closely al. 1998). mirror the macroscopic structure of the lesion (i.e., 116 R. Maroldi et al.
multiple cavernous blood-fi lled spaces expanding more relevant role in the pre-treatment work-up. and remodeling the host bone) (Som et al. 1991). As signifi cant blood loss may occur during surgery, Conventional X-ray fi lms demonstrate a well-de- preoperative embolization may grant easier resec- fi ned lytic lesion, demarcated by a “ballooned” bony tion of the lesion. Direct intraoperative sclerother- contour, probably refl ecting new bone formation by apy has also been reported (Chartrand-Lefebvre the periosteum. In about 30% of cases, irregular den- et al. 1996). sities can be seen within the lesion corresponding to The differential diagnosis of aneurysmal bone cyst calcifi ed chondroid-like material (Kransdorf and is rather complex, refl ecting the controversy still ex- Sweet 1995). isting about the real nature of this lesion. In fact, the CT scan allows additional information such as fo- propensity to create blood-fi lled spaces is shared by cal cortical breaches and fl uid-on-fl uid levels (in up a list of extremely different lesions including fi brous to 35% of cases) (Senol et al. 2002). Their identifi - dysplasia, chondromyxoid fi broma, non-ossifying fi - cation requires, in some cases, a few minutes delay broma, osteoblastoma, angioma, chondroblastoma, before scanning (to allow them to reform in the su- telangiectatic osteosarcoma. This observation has pine decubitus) and to display images with narrow led several authors to consider aneurysmal bone cyst window settings. as a pathophysiologic change in a preexisting lesion, MR shows a well-defi ned expansile lesion demar- rather than a distinct entity (Kransdorf and Sweet cated by a thin rim and crossed by multiple internal 1995; Citardi et al. 1996). The main weak point of septa. Both these display hypointense signal related this theory is represented by the low rate of associ- to the presence of fi brous tissue. Fluid material re- ated lesions ranging between 29% and 35%. tained within the cyst exhibits non-homogeneous This could be interpreted as a progressive involution signal, generally hypointense on T1 and hyperin- of the primary lesion that gradually looses its charac- tense on T2. Nonetheless, focal areas of spontane- teristic structure. Anyway, whenever an aneurysmal ously hyperintense T1 signal are also described, bone cyst is suspected, the main task of imaging is to refl ecting the presence of different byproducts of accurately detect any coexisting bone change: in this hemoglobin (Hrishikesh et al. 2002). Fluid-on- regard, CT may be preferred to MR, particularly when fl uid levels are much more commonly identifi ed areas with complex bone anatomy are assessed. than on CT; they are thought to represent the layer- ing of blood-tinged serous material above the un- clotted liquid blood, laying in the dependent part of 8.3.6 the cyst (Fig. 8.7). Follow-Up After contrast administration, bright enhancement is observed exclusively along both peripheral rim and Since treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts is associ- internal septa (De Minteguiaga et al. 2001). ated with a 20% recurrence rate, most by (90%) oc- Digital subtraction angiography also demon- curring within 2 years, patients require a close endo- strates the hypervascularity of the peripheral part scopic and radiological follow-up for at least 5 years of the lesion; however, this technique may play a after surgery (Ariel et al. 1992).
a b Fig. 8.7a,b. Aneurysmal bone cyst. Enhanced SE T1 (a) and plain post-surgery CT (b) on coronal plane. a A polypoid mass oc- cupies the left ethmoid, the middle turbinate is medially displaced. Fluid–fl uid level is present (arrowheads) with the inferior component exhibiting bright enhancement. b At 6 months after microendoscopic resection, submucosal recurrent lesion is associated with thickening and demineralization of lamina papyracea and fovea (arrows) Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 117
8.4 8.4.2 Sinonasal Mucocele Clinical and Endoscopic Findings
8.4.1 The clinical presentation of a mucocele varies in re- Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth lation to the anatomical area involved. Occasionally, patients may present vague and non-specifi c com- Mucocele may be defi ned as an accumulation of se- plaints similar to those of chronic rhinosinusitis, cretion products, desquamation, and infl ammation but there are indeed symptoms and signs suggesting within a paranasal sinus with expansion of its bony the diagnosis. When the frontal sinus is involved, walls. The lesion is limited by a wall (“sac”) made by frontal headache and proptosis may be the herald- respiratory mucosa with a pseudostratifi ed columnar ing manifestations; displacement of the ocular globe epithelium. According to Lloyd et al. (2000a), who in a downward and outward direction may result reported data on 70 mucoceles, 89% of the lesions in diplopia (Ikeda et al. 2000). If an erosion of the were located in the fronto-ethmoid area, while max- anterior or posterior wall of the frontal sinus is pres- illary, ethmoid and sphenoid mucoceles were rarely ent, a Pott’s puffy tumor or neurological symptoms observed. Mucocele more frequently occurs in the may occur, respectively. When a mucocele arises in fourth and fi fth decades of life, with approximately the ethmoid and/or sphenoid sinus the most fre- the same distribution in men and women. quent complaints are vertex or occipital headache, The development of the lesion is thought to occur associated to various ophthalmologic symptoms as the result of sinus ostium blockage. The accumula- (Moriyama et al. 1992; Benninger and Marks tion of mucus creates a positive pressure inside the 1995). Among these, one should bear in mind that cavity (Kass et al. 1999), which might explain resorp- sudden loss of vision may be the fi rst symptom of tion of the surrounding bony walls. Nevertheless, a mucocele involving the sphenoid sinus. Finally, a these factors cannot be considered fully responsible lesion localized into the maxillary sinus may pres- for the process, since sinus occlusion can also re- ent with cheek pressure or pain, maxillary nerve sult in chronic sinus atelectasia (Kass et al. 1997). hyperesthesia, dental pain, unilateral nasal obstruc- According to Wurster et al. (1986) and Lund et al. tion, mucous or purulent rhinorrhea (Busaba and (1988), there is a dynamic process occurring at the Salman 1999). interface between mucocele and bone, as suggested At endoscopy, the appearance varies according to by high levels of bone re-absorbing factors such as the phase of growth and to the site of the lesion. In PGE2, IL-1, and TNF, which have been demonstrated fact, while in the intrasinusal phase no alterations in the mucosa of the affected sinuses. Furthermore, are generally visible, expansion of the mucocele histology more often demonstrates an active secre- may lead to bony alterations of the lateral nasal wall, tory columnar ciliated epithelium instead of a thin as anterior dislocation of the uncinate process, me- atrophic cuboidal epithelium, as would be expected dialization of middle turbinate, bulging of the agger from the positive pressure existing inside the lesion nasi cells or of the infundibular area. Furthermore, (Lund and Milroy 1991). As mucus continues to be in a mucocele of the sphenoid sinus, a submucosal produced, mucocele gradually expands, resulting in remodeling or a bulging in the sphenoethmoid re- remodeling and/or erosion of the surrounding bone, cess or in the posterior ethmoid may be appreciated. with possible intraorbital and intracranial exten- In a purely frontal mucocele, endoscopy is usually sion. Secondary infection (pyomucocele) can lead to negative. a rapid expansion with signifi cant risk of complica- tions mostly involving the orbit. Sinus ostia obstruction may be the consequence of 8.4.3 chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic rhinitis, previous ra- Treatment Guidelines diotherapy, trauma, scarring due to previous surgical procedures, or, more rarely, of sinonasal neoplasms. Until the 1980s, mucocele was invariably treated by In recent years, some authors have alluded to a pos- an external approach, which was meant not only sible increase in the occurrence of mucoceles related to drain the mucus or pus collection, but also to to previous surgery (Rambaux et al. 2000); however, completely remove the affected sinus mucosa. In these data must be interpreted very cautiously. 1989, Kennedy et al. (1989) published a series of 18 sinus mucoceles treated by endoscopic mar- supialization without recurrences after a mean 118 R. Maroldi et al. follow up of 18 months. The philosophy behind 8.4.4 microendoscopic operation is to marsupialize the Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging lesion leaving untouched its epithelial-lined sac. Most surgeons are currently approaching muco- Confi rmation of the clinical diagnosis celes with a microendoscopic technique, which Assessment of the site and extension of the disease avoids any facial incision and gives similar results as well as of bony erosion entity (with special ref- compared to transfacial operations (Lund 1998; erence to orbital walls and skull base) Busaba and Salman 1999; Hartley and Lund Identifi cation of anatomical variants, hyperostotic 1999; Ikeda et al. 2000; Har-El 2001; Ichimura changes, or of a concomitant neoplasm causing et al. 2001). the mucocele However, a limited opening may not always war- In case of frontal mucocele, information on the rant a steady drainage of mucocele, particularly size of the sinus and the confi guration of the fron- in patients with a frontal localization who present tal recess which can help in selecting the best sur- one or more unfavorable conditions (diffuse polyp- gical approach oid rhinosinusitis, small frontal sinus, presence of abundant scar tissue due to previous surgery, facial trauma). In these cases, resorting to a type III drain- 8.4.5 age according to Draf (1991), which involves the Imaging Findings removal of the fl oor of both frontal sinuses together with the superior third of the nasal septum and drill- Imaging plays a crucial role in defi ning the deep ing of the intrasinusal septum, may ensure a wider extension of mucoceles, particularly towards three permanent drainage. Finally, mucoceles located in important areas, orbit, anterior cranial fossa (up to the far lateral extremity of a hyperpneumatized fron- 20%), and optic nerve canal (Koike et al. 1996). Sinus tal sinus may be diffi cult to reach transnasally and expansion with bulging of bony walls is the most typ- require an external approach through an osteoplastic ical presentation of mucocele (Fig. 8.8). Nonetheless, frontal sinusotomy. Whenever a mucocele is second- it must be emphasized that both bone defects and ary to a tumor, selection of the surgical approach is bulging usually involve all sinusal walls in lesions sec- obviously dictated by the nature, site, and extent of ondary to ostial obstruction, whereas they are more the tumor. often focal in postoperative lesions. This is thought Diagnosis and treatment of a mucocele located to be due to a compartmentalization of the sinusal in the sphenoid sinus and impairing visual acuity cavity, occurring as a post-surgical change (Han et or causing visual loss must be considered an emer- al. 1995). As a consequence, post-surgical mucoceles, gency, since only a prompt drainage within a few particularly in the ethmoid, may develop within a hours from the onset of symptoms may revert the single isolated concameration without expanding all defi cit. the walls. On MR, diagnosis can be suspected when
abc
Fig. 8.8a–c. Mucocele. Plain CT on coronal plane (a–c). a Frontal sinus is expanded and remodeled, its fl oor is completely demineralized (white arrows). Inferolateral displacement of the ocular bulb can be observed. Retained secretions within sinus cavity (b) exhibit rather high density, refl ecting desiccation. Scans acquired at the level of middle meatus (c) demonstrate an ethmoidal lesion destroying the medial orbital wall, nasal septum and ethmoid fovea (black arrows). The lesion impairs mucus drainage in the middle meatus and is, therefore, responsible for mucocele formation Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 119 signal a intensity differing from typical fl uid and not in patients with severe allergy (particularly in those with solid is detected within a cell. aspirin intolerance) (Price et al. 1981). Furthermore, In fact, both CT and MR appearance of mucoceles an increased number of mucoceles secondary to en- largely depends on the composition of the entrapped doscopic sinus surgery procedures has been reported material. At MR, the basic expected signal pattern of (Raynal et al. 1999). These mucoceles tend to develop fl uids (hyper T2, hypo T1) may be greatly altered by earlier (<22 months) than after open sinus surgery or progressive dehydration and consequent increase of trauma (<10 years). Different causes of sinus obstruc- viscosity and protein concentration (Lim et al. 1999; tion have been demonstrated by endoscopy and CT. Sievers et al. 2000). In detail, protein concentration Fronto-ethmoid mucoceles were caused by frontal re- within the range 20%–25% will result in hyperintensity cess occlusion due to fi brotic/osteogenic scar tissue, or at both T2 and T1. Further increase of concentration anterior ethmoid synechia; maxillary sinus mucoceles changes the signal pattern, which turns to hypointen- were related to stenosis/occlusion of the ethmoid in- sity, respectively at 30% (T2) and 40% (T1) (Som et al. fundibulum because of uncinate process fragments or 1989) (Fig. 8.9). Similarly to the various signal patterns scar tissue. Besides, mucoceles of the maxillary sinus observed on MR, CT density ranges from fl uid-like may develop after Caldwell-Luc procedures due to the (cystic appearance) to progressively higher values as entrapment of mucosa (Weber et al. 2000). far as the entrapped material desiccates. Hypointense Although infrequent, sphenoid sinus mucoceles signal and high density on plain T1 can be observed entail complex clinical problems, as they may erode also in the case of eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis the optic nerve canal, the sinusal wall separating from (Van Tassel et al. 1989). After contrast administra- the cavernous sinus, or largely extend into a pneuma- tion, enhancement is observed exclusively at the pe- tized pterygoid root. Expansion of the whole sphe- riphery, along the thin mucosal layer, both at CT and noid sinus, remodeling, and focal erosion indicate the MR (Lloyd et al. 2000a; Hejazi et al. 2001). slow-growing development of a mucocele (Fig. 8.10). Anterior ethmoid mucoceles are more frequent than Signal patterns on MR and CT density may vary in those arising from posterior ethmoid cells, probably relation to the protein content. because anterior ethmoid cells have smaller ostia, more The differential diagnosis of mucocele is strictly easily obstructed in pathologic conditions. Ethmoid related to the pattern of growth and site of origin of mucoceles tend to thin and remodel the adjacent lamina the lesion. In the early phase – not associated with si- papyracea. They may also arise in cells resulting from nus expansion and bone destruction – retention cyst, the extensive pneumatization of adjacent structures, as rhinosinusitis and polyposis should be considered. in mucoceles developed within a concha bullosa. Though rather uncommon, the presence of intrasinusal Multiple mucoceles are infrequent, more often ob- calcifi cations could raise the suspect of non-invasive served after facial fractures, complex facial surgery, and fungal rhinosinusitis (Sievers et al. 2000) (Fig. 8.11).
a b c
Fig. 8.9a–c. Post-surgical mucocele. MR SE T2 on axial plane (a), SE T1 on coronal plane (b), and enhanced SE T1 on sagittal plane (c). At 2 years after craniofacial resection for ethmoid adenocarcinoma, (a) MR demonstrates a mucocele occupying the left frontal sinus. b This is related to the presence of scar tissue impairing mucus drainage (white arrows). Note hypointensity on T2 and spontaneous T1 hyperintensity of the retained material in the inferior and inner portion of the mucocele (asterisk). c After contrast agent administration no enhancement of the mucocele or of the mucosa within frontal sinus is seen. Note regular and ossifi ed margins of frontal sinusotomy (white arrow). Mild enhancement of the meningo-galeal complex is demonstrated at the level of the reconstructed anterior skull base fl oor (black arrows) 120 R. Maroldi et al.
a b Fig. 8.10a,b. Mucocele. CT (a) and MR T2 (b), coronal plane. The lesion occupies and markedly expands the left sphenoid sinus. Bone remodeling is detected consisting of demineralization of the greater sphenoid wing (arrows), base of the pterygoid process (asterisk), and pterygoid laminae. Note the sharp margin of the residual part of the sphenoid wing, pointing out resorption rather than destruction. Eggshell calcifi cations are present at the periphery of the lesion (white arrow- heads). Retained secretions show hypointense MR signal in the caudal part of the lesion (black arrowheads), probably due to dehydration and increase in protein content
a b
c d
Fig. 8.11a–d. Fungal superinfection of residual cavity. Plain CT on axial plane (a,b), enhanced SE T1 on axial plane (c), fat-suppressed SE T2 on sagittal plane (d). At 3 years after craniotomic evacuation of a left frontal sinus mucocele, a residual cavity is demonstrated by both techniques, exhibiting expanded and remodeled bony walls. Retained material within the cavity shows spon- taneous CT hyperdensity and hypointensity on all MR sequences in its central part. Findings are consistent with fungal superinfection. The peripheral rim lining the cavity (arrows) probably corresponds to the mucosal layer Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 121
Actually, in mycotic lesions these are more frequently soft tissues. It is worth mentioning that this classifi ca- seen in the central part of the sinus, whereas in a mu- tion is not universally adopted, so that discrepancies cocele calcifi cations develop close to the mucosal layer in nomenclature may be encountered. (Yo on et al. 1999). One or more paranasal sinuses can be involved at A list of more critical differentials must be consid- the same time. Frontal and sphenoid sinuses are most ered when extensive bone remodeling and destruc- frequently involved (Bachor et al. 1994), whereas tion are observed, including necrotic squamous cell the occurrence in the maxillary sinus and ethmoid carcinoma, cystadenocarcinoma, plasmacytoma, and is more rare. (for sphenoid sinus mucoceles) pituitary adenoma Due to the infrequency of the disease, epidemio- (Skoulakis et al. 1999; Hejazi et al. 2001). At MR, logic data are lacking. Nevertheless, the reported enhancement pattern – better than T2 and plain T1 age of observation ranges between 12 and 72 years, signal – helps to obtain the diagnosis: absent or ex- with the highest peak of occurrence in the third and clusively peripheral contrast uptake enables one to fourth decade (Stretch and Poole 1992; Tellado predict mucocele with a sensitivity of up to 83%–93% et al. 2002) and a specifi city of up to 86%–95% (Yousem 1993; Atasoy et al. 2001). 8.5.2 Pathogenesis 8.4.6 Follow-Up Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain the occurrence of an abnormal sinusal pneumatiza- The follow up of patients treated through endonasal tion. According to some authors (Benedikt et al. or open surgery for a mucocele entails a close clinical 1991), a spontaneously drained mucocele could lead examination with endoscopic survey. Imaging is indi- to this unusual dilation. One of the most credited cated when the patient presents ocular symptoms or theories is based on the existence of a valve obstruc- when the cavity cannot be accessed or assessed (i.e., tive mechanism, which could explain the intrasinusal mucoceles previously located laterally in the frontal entrapment of air with consequent pressure in- sinus, recurrence of nasal polyps). crease and sinus dilatation (Wolfensberger 1984). However, this hypothesis does not explain why the abnormal pneumatization does not evolve in sinus- itis; secretions and infl amed mucosa are in fact com- 8.5 pletely absent. Also, an alteration in bone turnover Abnormal Sinus Pneumatization mechanism have been purposed (Rosenberg 1994). In some cases a remodeling action on bony tissues 8.5.1 due to a meningioma of the optic nerve (Hirst et Defi nition and Epidemiology al. 1979), or to a bone disease, such as fi brous dys- plasia (Lloyd 1985) or Melnick-Needle syndrome The observation of an abnormal pneumatization of (Stretch and Poole 1992), was considered the main a sinus, a condition fi rst described by Meyes (1898), pathogenetic factor. It seems appropriate to defi ne is a very rare event. According to the classifi cation these latter cases as “secondary” abnormal pneuma- proposed by Urken et al. (1987), three different cat- tization, differentiating them from the “idiopathic” egories are encompassed under the name of enlarged ones (Trimarchi et al. 2003). aerated sinuses: hypersinus, pneumosinus dilatans, and pneumocele. The fi rst term refers to an abnor- mally aerated sinus which is increased in size but still 8.5.3 within the range of normal limits and not associated Clinical and Endoscopic Findings with bony thinning or erosion. Pneumosinus dilatans is a sinus dilatation beyond the normal range but Signs and symptoms typical of abnormal paranasal still with normal bony thickness. When focal bony sinus pneumatization are very different, according erosion or diffuse thinning is detected, the defi nition to the site of origin, the number of sinuses involved, of pneumocele is adopted. Some authors (Chan et al. and the entity of dilation. When the maxillary si- 1992) distinguish pneumocele from pneumatocele, nus is involved, facial pain, possibly increased by the latter being characterized by the presence of air in atmospheric pressure changes, nasal obstruction, 122 R. Maroldi et al. facial deformity, are the most frequent presenting 8.5.5 complaints (Komori and Sugisaki 1988; Breidhal Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging et al. 1997; Mauri et al. 2000; Karlidag et al. 2003; Trimarchi et al. 2003). Also hearing loss and ear Demonstration that the expansile submucosal pain (Morrison et al. 1976), and enlargement of the subcutaneus lesion is due to an abnormal pneu- swelling after exposure to sunlight have been detected matization of a sinusal cavity (Mauri et al. 2000). Involvement of the lamina papy- Assessment of the actual size of the involved racea may lead to the onset of ocular disturbances, sinus(es) like eye ball displacement, diplopia or exophthalmos. Precise defi nition of bony wall thickness, with spe- In the presence of frontal sinus dilation, nasal ob- cial reference to the presence of areas of resorp- struction, frontal headache, facial deformity, and eye tion (partial or complete) ball displacement are frequently evident at diagnosis Involvement of critical areas (i.e., orbit, optic (Adams et al. 1998; Klossek et al. 2000; Wa l ke r canal) and Jones 2002). Sphenoid abnormal pneumatiza- Possible presence of lesions arising from bone or tion may present with visual disturbances (Bachor neoplasms associated with the abnormal pneuma- et al. 1994; Skolnick et al. 2000), headache, pain in tization the proximity of the ocular bulb (Adams et al. 1998), abnormal secretion of pituitary hormones (Reicher et al. 1986). These clinical presentation modalities are 8.5.6 sometimes hardly distinguishable from those typical Imaging Findings of other expansile lesions. At endoscopy, displacement of sinusal bony walls Aberrant enlargement of a normally aerated sinus is commonly detected; conversely, no mucosal lesion cavity is an obvious diagnosis, both at plain radiog- is present. Nevertheless, facial deformities or sinusal raphy and at CT. The latter provides additional infor- wall displacement do not allow one to rule out a mass mation needed to differentiate pneumosinus dilatans growing within the sinus and/or along a submucosal from pneumocele and hypersinus (Trimarchi et al. plane. The diagnosis of abnormal pneumatization is 2003). According to Urken et al.’s (1987) classifi ca- therefore based upon imaging evaluation. tion, pneumosinus dilatans is an abnormal sinus ex- pansion that may cause deformity – such as frontal bossing – in the absence of any abnormality of bony 8.5.4 sinus walls. Detection of focal or generalized thinning Treatment Guidelines of sinus walls switches the diagnosis to pneumocele (Fig. 8.12). Hypersinus lacks both deformities and The treatment of abnormal sinus pneumatization bone changes, as a consequence its diagnosis is based is surgery, which is meant to restore a normal ven- on the detection of sinus size exceeding statistically tilation of the sinus through a wide sinusotomy. calculated normal limits. Microendoscopic surgery, a minimally invasive ap- The absence of inherent contrast between air and proach, appears to be the most appropriate and ef- cortical bone (both hypointense on all sequences), re- fective option (Trimarchi et al. 2003). In maxillary stricts the role of MR in these conditions. localization, a wide meatotomy avoids further si- nus enlargement and allows cessation of symptoms. When a cosmetic correction of facial deformity is required, an external approach may be necessary. 8.6 A coronal approach for frontal sinus enlargement Inverted Papilloma and Other Schneiderian (Klossek et al. 2000; Tellado et al. 2002) or an Papillomas infratemporal approach for maxillary enlargement and orbital involvement may be accomplished (Trimarchi et al. 2003). Bifrontal craniotomy has been attempted also with the aim to decom- 8.6.1 press optic nerves in case of sphenoid involvement Defi nition, Epidemiology, Pattern of Growth (Stretch and Poole 1992). According to Shanmugaratnam (1991), inverted papilloma is an epithelial benign neoplasm com- Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 123
a b
Fig. 8.12a,b. Pneumosinus dilatans. Plain CT on coronal plane (a) and, after surgery, on axial plane (b). Abnormal enlargement of the right maxillary sinus, medially contacting the nasal septum (arrow), no bone destruction is appreciated. After surgical resection of the medial maxillary sinus wall and middle turbinate, normal caliber of the nasal fossa is restored (asterisks)
posed of invaginating crypts, thick ribbons or islands 1971 Hyams reported that in the majority of cases of non-keratinizing squamous epithelium which may with multiple site involvement the histologic fi nd- alternate with or be covered by pseudostratifi ed co- ings suggested the spread to result from one single lumnar (cylindrical) or ciliated respiratory epithe- lesion by metaplasia of the adjacent mucosa. In this lium. The infolding of the mucosa may result in the way, inverted papilloma could easily extend through presence of apparently discontinuous cell masses ly- sinus ostia to the surrounding cavities without de- ing deep in the epithelial surface, but the basement stroying the bony walls. Intracranial invasion is a membrane is intact and may be shown to be continu- rare event, mostly noted in lesions recurring at the ous with that of surface epithelium. level of the cribriform plate or ethmoid roof (Vural Inverted papilloma originates from the schneide- et al. 1999). Intraorbital extension may be observed rian membrane, which is the ectodermally derived in lesions with extensive ethmoid involvement; how- mucosa that lines the nasal cavity and paranasal si- ever, the tumor usually laterally displaces the orbital nuses. The lesion is estimated to represent 0.4%–4.7% content without transgressing the periorbit (Elner of the surgically removed nasal tumors, with an inci- et al. 1995; Bajaj and Pushker 2002). The presenta- dence ranging from 0.6 to 1.5 cases per 100,000 in- tion of inverted papilloma is generally unilateral, but habitants per year (Buchwald et al. 1995; Outzen et bilateral involvement of the sinonasal tract has been al. 1996). Males are four to fi ve times more frequently reported in a percentage of patients ranging from less affected than females (Hyams 1971; Phillips et al. than 1% (Phillips et al. 1990) to 9% (Weissler et 1990; Winter et al. 2000). Inverted papilloma is prev- al. 1986). alent in the fi fth and sixth decades of life, although The association between inverted papilloma and isolated observations in the pediatric age group have squamous cell carcinoma, reported to be as high as been reported (Cooter et al. 1998). up to 56% (Yamaguchi et al. 1979), is likely to be Even though its etiology is still unknown, recent overestimated. In fact, recent accurate reviews of the studies using in situ hybridization and polymerase literature (Pelausa and Fortier 1992; Mansell chain reaction have detected human papilloma virus and Bates 2000; Krouse 2001) and data coming in up to 86% of the lesions (Tang et al. 1994). In par- from large series (Hyams 1971; Weissler et al 1986; ticular, viral subtypes 6, 11, 16, and 18 were the most Kapadia et al. 1993) concur to indicate that the two frequently found (Brandwein et al. 1989; Furuta et diseases are concomitantly diagnosed in 2% to 13% al. 1991; Gaffey et al. 1996). of patients. A further 1%–1.5% of patients has been The lateral wall of the nasal fossa and the maxil- shown to present a metachronous sinonasal malig- lary sinus are the most frequent sites of origin of in- nant lesion (Fechner and Alford 1968; Weissler verted papilloma, whereas its exclusive localization et al. 1986). to the frontal (Shohet and Duncavage 1996; Chee Staging systems have been developed for a range and Sethi 1999) or the sphenoid sinus (Yiotakis of benign and malignant lesions of the nose and pa- et al. 2001a; Lee et al. 2003) is exceedingly rare. In ranasal sinuses with the intent to guide selection of 124 R. Maroldi et al. surgical strategies and to allow comparison of treat- Table 8.1. Staging system for inverted papilloma (Krouse) ment results. As mentioned by Krouse (2000), several authors have developed staging systems for inverted T1 Tumor totally confi ned to the nasal cavity, without exten- sion into the sinuses. The tumor can be localized to one papilloma very similar to those used for malignan- wall or region of the nasal cavity, or can be bulky and cies of the sinonasal tract. However, very recently two extensive within the nasal cavity, but must not extend into new staging systems specifi c for inverted papilloma the sinuses or into any extra nasal compartment. There have been introduced (Krouse 2000; Han et al. 2001) must be no concurrent malignancy (Tables 8.1, 8.2). T2 Tumor involving the ostiomeatal complex, and ethmoid sinuses, and/or the medial portion of the maxillary sinus, with or without involvement of the nasal cavity. There must be no concurrent malignancy 8.6.2 T3 Tumor involving the lateral, inferior, superior, anterior, or Clinical and Endoscopic Findings posterior walls of the maxillary sinus, the sphenoid sinus, and/or the frontal sinus, with or without involvement of the medial portion of the maxillary sinus, the ethmoid Although nonspecifi c, a well-established group of sinuses, or the nasal cavity. There must be no concurrent signs and symptoms is associated with inverted papil- malignancy loma at initial presentation. Unilateral nasal obstruc- T4 All tumors with any extra-nasal/extra-sinus extension to tion and hyposmia are the predominant complaints involve adjacent, contiguous structures such as orbit, the when the lesion originates from the lateral nasal wall intracranial compartment, or the pterygomaxillary space. All tumors associated with malignancy and fi lls the nasal fossa, while symptoms mimicking a sinus infl ammatory disease, such as watery or muco- purulent rhinorrhea, headache, toothache, and facial pain are mostly reported when inverted papilloma Table 8.2. Staging system for inverted papilloma (Han) involves the maxillary sinus. Less frequently, patients complain of additional symptoms such as diplopia, Group I Tumor involvement limited to the nasal cavity, proptosis, epiphora and/or persistent headache and lateral nasal wall, medial maxillary sinus, ethmoid cerebrospinal fl uid leak, which should suggest an ex- sinus, and sphenoid sinus tension of the lesion extending into the orbit and/or Group II Same as group I except that tumor extends lateral the anterior cranial fossa, respectively. to the medial maxillary wall Endoscopic examination usually reveals a unilat- Group III Tumor extends to involve the frontal sinus eral, pale, polypoid-like mass, covered by a papil- lary surface and protruding from the middle meatus Group IV Tumor extends outside the sinonasal cavities (i.e., orbital or intracranial extension) (Fig. 8.13). More rarely the lesion occupies the supe-
abc
Figure 8.13 a-c. a Endoscopic view of inverted papilloma. Coronal (b) and axial (c) TSE T2 images show that only the small por- tion of the inverted papilloma protruding into the middle (MM) and inferior (IM) meati is actually demonstrated by endoscopy – arrowheads point to the inferior turbinate (b). Within the maxillary sinus, the main part appears hypointense compared with the bright signal of the thickened mucosa. NLD, nasolacrimal duct; UP, uncinate process; MT, middle turbinate; IT, inferior turbinate; NS, nasal septum Benign Neoplasms and Tumor-Like Lesions 125 rior meatus. The concomitant presence of infl amma- medial wall of the maxillary sinus, a type 2 resection tory polyps may be misleading and can cause a delay is performed. In addition to all surgical steps of a type in establishing a proper diagnosis. Therefore, when- 1 resection, the operation includes a medial maxil- ever the clinician is faced with a unilateral polypoid lectomy with or without section of the nasolacrimal lesion, multiple biopsies are mandatory. duct, in relation to the anterior extent of the tumor. Inverted papillomas that originate from or involve the posterolateral, anterior and/or inferior wall of the 8.6.3 maxillary sinus are better managed through a type Treatment Guidelines 3 resection, which corresponds to the technique in- dicated by Brors and Draf (1999) as an “endonasal Surgery is unanimously considered the treatment of Denker operation”. choice for inverted papilloma. Features repeatedly In patients undergoing a Type 2 or 3 resection, “en emphasized in the literature such as multicentricity, bloc” removal is rarely feasible due to the large extent frequent association with squamous cell carcinoma, of the lesion. Therefore, debulking of the nasal por- and high incidence of recurrences have prompted tion of the mass is fi rst performed to subsequently most of the authors to identify medial maxillectomy focus on the most critical areas involved by the lesion, (by lateral rhinotomy or midfacial degloving) as where dissection is always carried out in the subperi- the surgical technique of choice (Myers et al. 1990; osteal plane. Drilling of the bone underlying the dis- Lawson et al. 1995; Outzen et al. 1996). However, eased mucosa is then performed to ensure surgical the introduction in the early 1980s of microendo- radicality. scopic surgery, along with the subsequent refi nement In the era when transnasal resection without mi- of instrumentation and the increasing experience in croendoscopic assistance was the only available tech- endonasal surgery for infl ammatory diseases, have nique, “recurrences” ranged from 40% (Oberman led to successful results in the treatment of inverted 1964) to 78% (Calcaterra et al. 1980). We concur papilloma even with more conservative techniques with other authors (Hyams 1971; Lund 2000) that (Brors and Draf 1999; Lund 2000; Winter et al. most of these “recurrences” were probably “residual” 2000). According to Lund (2000), there is no single lesions, since the exposure offered by a transnasal ap- right or wrong surgical solution but rather a range proach did not guarantee an adequate radicality of of procedures from which a choice should be made the resection and “recurrent” lesions prevalently oc- in any individual case. curred at the same site of the primary (Lund 2000). In our experience, based on the management of 47 By using external medial maxillectomy or microen- patients (Tomenzoli et al. 2004), a microendoscopic doscopic dissection the occurrence of recurrences approach is contraindicated when one of the follow- has dropped down to a prevalence ranging from ing situations is present: extensive involvement of the 0% (Weissler et al. 1986) to 29% (Bielamowicz frontal sinus; massive bone erosion (except for the et al. 1993), and from 0% (Kamel 1995) to 33% medial wall of the maxillary sinus and the anterior (Stankiewicz and Girgis 1993), respectively. wall of the sphenoid sinus); intradural invasion; in- Even though most recurrent inverted papillomas traorbital invasion; abundant scar tissue due to pre- present within 2 years following treatment, late re- vious surgery; association with squamous cell carci- currences may also occur. Therefore, it is mandatory noma. Different microendoscopic resections may be to prospectively follow patients with endoscopic con- adopted in relation to the site of origin and the extent trols every 4 months during the fi rst postoperative of the lesion. When inverted papilloma is limited to year and subsequently every 6 months for at least the middle meatus, anterior and posterior ethmoid, 4 years. In contrast to other benign diseases such and/or spheno-ethmoid recess, a type 1 resection, as juvenile angiofi broma, which requires radiologic including anterior ethmoidectomy with clearance evaluation for early detection of recurrent submu- of the frontal recess, posterior ethmoidectomy, a cosal lesions (Nicolai et al. 2003), imaging should large middle antrostomy, sphenoidotomy, partial or be obtained only in patients with clear endoscopic middle turbinectomy (according to tumor extent) is evidence of disease or with a complete stenosis of performed. In such a situation, an “en bloc” resection sinus ostium/a precluding a full endoscopic sinus in- is easily obtained, making sure that the dissection is spection. In the latter situation, imaging evaluation is carried out in the subperiosteal plane. aimed not only at detecting recurrent lesions, but also Whenever the lesion extends from the middle me- to diagnose possible sequelae such as mucocele. atus into the maxillary sinus or originates from the 126 R. Maroldi et al.
8.6.4 Key Information to Be Provided by Imaging