DOCSLIB.ORG

Heathrow Airport North West Runway FINAL for CONSULTATION AIRPORTS COMMISSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heathrow Airport North West Runway FINAL for CONSULTATION AIRPORTS COMMISSION ` Appraisal Framework Module 4. Surface Access: Heathrow Airport North West Runway FINAL FOR CONSULTATION AIRPORTS COMMISSION 5th November 2014 Appraisal Framework Module 4. Surface Access: Heathrow Airport North West Runway Document Control Sheet Project: Appraisal Framework Module 4. Client: Airports Commission Document title: Surface Access: Heathrow Airport North West Runway Project No: B1988000 Originated by Checked by Reviewed by NAME NAME NAME ORIGINAL Tim Beech Tim Beech Dan Philips Stephen Rutherford Jon Hale Precious Ikem NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Approved by Check and Review procedure and that I approve Stephen Rutherford them for issue DATE July 2014 Document status: DRAFT Originated by Checked by Reviewed by NAME NAME NAME REVISION 1 Dan Philips Tim Beech Stephen Rutherford Precious Ikem Jon Hale NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Approved by Check and Review procedure and that I approve Stephen Rutherford them for issue DATE November 2014 Document status: FINAL Jacobs U.K. Limited This document has been prepared by a division, subsidiary or affiliate of Jacobs U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs. If you have received this document in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document (a) should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole; (b) do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion; (c) are based upon the information made available to Jacobs at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this document. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs has been made. No liability is accepted by Jacobs for any use of this document, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Following final delivery of this document to the Client, Jacobs will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this document. This document has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this document. Should the Client wish to release this document to a third party, Jacobs may, at its discretion, agree to such release provided that (a) Jacobs’ written agreement is obtained prior to such release; and (b) by release of the document to the third party, that third party does not acquire any rights, contractual or otherwise, whatsoever against Jacobs and Jacobs, accordingly, assume no duties, liabilities or obligations to that third party; and (c) Jacobs accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage incurred by the Client or for any conflict of Jacobs’ interests arising out of the Client's release of this document to the third party. 1 i Appraisal Framework Module 4. Surface Access: Heathrow Airport North West Runway Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 12 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Study scope .................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3 Methodology overview .................................................................................................................................................................. 13 1.4 Heathrow submission.................................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.5 Report structure ............................................................................................................................................................................ 15 2. Definition of Core and Extended Baselines .......................................................................................... 16 2.1 Core Baseline (rail) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 Extended Baseline with SRA (rail) ................................................................................................................................................ 18 2.3 Core and Extended Baselines (roads) .......................................................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Other modes ................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 3. Headline forecasts ................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 3.2 Sensitivity tests ............................................................................................................................................................................. 22 3.3 Forecast demand .......................................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.4 Mode share (Core Baseline) ......................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.5 Mode share (Extended Baseline with SRA) .................................................................................................................................. 26 3.6 Supporting sustainability ............................................................................................................................................................... 27 4. Rail assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 29 4.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.2 Committed improvements to the GWML ....................................................................................................................................... 30 4.3 Core Baseline ............................................................................................................................................................................... 31 4.4 Extended Baseline with SRA ........................................................................................................................................................ 34 4.5 GWML capacity............................................................................................................................................................................. 35 4.6 2030 rail demand .......................................................................................................................................................................... 37 4.7 2030 rail capacity analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 38 4.8 Accommodating other rail users ................................................................................................................................................... 42 4.9 Level of Service Analysis .............................................................................................................................................................. 42 4.10 Rail Scheme costs ........................................................................................................................................................................ 49 5. Roads assessment .................................................................................................................................. 50 5.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................................. 50 5.2 Airport impacts .............................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South West Main Line Strategic Study 3 MB
    OFFICIAL South West Main Line Strategic Study Phase 1 2021 1 OFFICIAL Network Rail Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Long-Term Planning Process ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 The South West Main Line Today................................................................................................................. 8 4.0 Strategic Context ..............................................................................................................................................13 5.0 South West Main Line - Demand ................................................................................................................25 6.0 Capacity Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................34 7.0 Intervention Feasibility ...................................................................................................................................59 8.0 Emerging Strategic Advice ............................................................................................................................62 Appendix A – Safety Baseline .....................................................................................................................................74 Appendix B – Development
    [Show full text]
  • South Western Franchise Agreement
    _____ September 2006 THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT and STAGECOACH SOUTH WESTERN TRAINS LIMITED SOUTH WESTERN FRANCHISE AGREEMENT incorporating by reference the National Rail Franchise Terms (Second Edition) CONTENTS CLAUSE PAGE 1. INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................. 4 2. COMMENCEMENT .......................................................................................................... 5 3. TERM 5 4. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................................ 6 5. SPECIFIC OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................................. 6 6. COMMITTED OBLIGATIONS ......................................................................................... 48 7. SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS ............................................................................................... 48 8. RECALIBRATION OF THE BENCHMARKS ...................................................................... 49 9. DOCUMENTS IN THE AGREED TERMS .......................................................................... 49 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT ................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX 1 ........................................................................................................................... 52 Secretary of State Risk Assumptions (Clause 5.1(y)) ................................................. 52 APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH 7S Derslik-2016-Son.Indd
    QIZTAMAM QULÈYEVA, XALÈDß RÖSTßMOVA ENGLISH 7 Ömumtÿhsil mÿktÿblÿrinin 7-ci sinfi ö÷ön “Èngilis dili” (ÿsas xa ir c i dil ik mi) fÿnni özrÿ dÿrslik Azÿrbaycan Respublikasû Tÿhsil Nazirliyinin 07.08.2014-cö il tarixli 869 nþmrÿli ÿmri ilÿ tÿsdiq olunmuødur. “KÞVSßR” NßØRÈYYATI BAKI – 2016 Çap üçün deyil QIZTAMAM QULÈYEVA, XALÈDß RÖSTßMOVA Ömumtÿhsil mÿktÿblÿrinin 7-ci sinfi ö÷ön “Èngilis dili” (ÿsas xa ir c i dil ik mi) fÿnni özrÿ dÿrslik. Bakû, «KÞVSßR» nÿøriyyatû 2016, 160 sÿh. Dil redaktoru: SßADßT ZEYNALOVA Dÿrsliklÿ baülû rÿy, irad vÿ tÿkliflÿrinizi [email protected] vÿ [email protected] elekton önvanlara gþndÿrilmÿsi xahiø olunur. ßmÿkdaølûüûnûz ö÷ön ÿvvÿlcÿdÿn tÿøÿkkör edirik! Möÿlliflik höquqlarû qorunur. Xösusi icazÿ olmadan bu nÿøri vÿ yaxud onun hÿr hansû hissÿsini yenidÿn ÷ap etdirmÿk, surÿtini ÷ûxarmaq, elektron informasiya vasitÿlÿri ilÿ yaymaq qanuna ziddir. ISBN 978-9952-8142-7-9 ©- Azərbaycan Respublikası Təhsil Nazirliyi – 2016 Çap üçün deyil HEYDƏR ƏLİYEV АZƏRBAYCAN XALQININ ÜMUMMİLLİ LİDERİ HEYDAR ALIYEV THE NATIONAL LEADER OF THE AZERBAIJAN I NATION Çap üçün3 deyil Çap üçün deyil SCHOOL UNITUNIT 11 Lesson 1. We are at School, Again! Getting ready for the task: ● What is the date today? ● How do you celebrate this holiday? ● What holiday is it today? Key words: a fi rst-grade student – a beginner at school to be surrounded with – to be encircled /a fi rst former an academic year – a school year to name after – to give a name to smb/smth 1 CW. Listen to the passages and answer the questions looking through the pictures. ● What is happening and where is ● What holiday are they celebrating? the President? ● What do the schoolchildren have ● Why are the children happy? in their hands? I think today is an unforgettable day for students.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Downland
    8. LANDSCAPE TYPE 1: OPEN DOWNLAND Location and Boundaries 8.1. The landscape type encompasses a number of distinct downland blocks from the Marlborough Downs (1A) and Horton Down (1C) in the west running through to the Lambourn Downs (1B) and Blewbury Downs (1D) in the east. Boundaries are mainly defined by topography and the Upper Chalk geology, and in the north relate to the top of the Scarp (landscape type 5). To the south, the edge of the chalk similarly forms a distinct boundary. Overview The Open Downlands are the remote heart and core of the North Wessex Downs, with the dramatic landscapes created by the underlying chalk rocks being one of the defining features of the AONB. The subtle curves and undulations of the landform are revealed by the uniform clothing of cropped grass or cereals creating a landscape with a simple and elemental quality, accentuated by vast skies. The open, expansive views are punctuated by distinctive beech clumps crowning the downland summits, forming prominent and highly visible landmarks. Sparsely populated, the downlands possess a strong sense remoteness and isolation. Predominantly in arable cultivation these are landscapes of great seasonal variation, with muted browns and greys of the chalk and flinty soils in the ploughed autumn fields, giving way to fresh greens of the emerging crops in winter and spring and sweeping yellows and golds of summer. The characteristic close-cropped springy downland turf of the surviving herb-rich chalk grassland provides an important habitat and this landscape type contains the largest areas of designated chalk grassland in the AONB, with 15 Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
    [Show full text]
  • Prime London Suburb Freehold Property with A1/A3 Planning
    Prime London Suburb Freehold Property with A1/A3 planning consent For sale with full vacant possession PRIME TRADING LOCATION ON GEORGE STREET OPPOSITE THE SOON TO BE DEVELOPED HOUSE OF FRASER DEPARTMENT STORE GEORGE STREET, RICHMOND, TW9 1JY INVESTMENT SUMMARY Richmond lies just 9 miles south west of Central London and is one of London’s most popular and prosperous boroughs offering a blend of urban and rural qualities in a major capital city. Affluent borough population of approximately 196,000 people. Thriving residential and tourist location served by National Rail and London Underground. 4.5m visitors to Richmond every year. Freehold. Benefit of a current A1/A3 planning consent. Prime trading location on George Street adjacent to Marks & Spencer, whilst in close proximity to Anthropologie, Jo Malone, Molton Brown and the House of Fraser department store which will be redeveloped into 22,000 sq ft of prime retail and 42,000 sq ft of grade A office accommodation. Potential to convert upper floor to residential and increase massing, subject to planning. Our clients are seeking offers in excess of £2,000,000 (Two Million Pounds) subject to contract and exclusive of VAT, which reflects a capital value of £321 per sq ft. RICHMOND GREEN GEORGE STREET A305 KING STREET HILL STREET A307 RED LION STREET A307 Gunnerbury M4 Park A4 A4 A4 S ME A A4 H A2 GEORGE STREET, RICHMOND, TW9 1JY T R 0 E 5 IV FULHAM R A316 Royal WWT Botanic London Gardens Wetland Kew Centre A316 d ichmond Rd A ham R Upper R 205 en ick Tw A3 A316 Rd LOCATION tsey RICHMOND Cher Rd on A214 Richmond sits within the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, st ng located approximately 9 miles (14.5 km) to the south west of Central London.
    [Show full text]
  • FIND US Per Car Per Day Or £10 for Lunch Or Dinner Guests
    BY ROA D From M25: leave at Junction 12 onto the M3, leading onto the (A316). Leave the (A316) at either the St Margaret’s Roundabout or Richmond Circus Roundabout. From St Margaret’s Roundabout (A316) – Follow St Margaret’s Road (A3004), past St Margaret’s Railway Station and continue to follow the road (A305) over Richmond Bridge. At mini- roundabout turn right onto the (A307) (signposted Kingston, Ham, Petersham). Follow Petersham Road (A307) for 300m before arrival. RICHMOND From Kew Road & Richmond Station (A307) – At Richmond Circus roundabout follow the signs for the (A307) (signposted Richmond). Continue past Richmond Station, turning left at traffic lights onto the one way system. Immediately move into the right-hand lane, turning right onto Eton Street and then again turning right onto Paradise Road. At T-junction turn left onto the (A307) (signposted Petersham, Kingston, Twickenham). At mini-roundabout continue onto the (A307) to Petersham Road for 300m before arrival. ST MARGARETS From Kingston & Ham – Follow the (A307) (signposted Richmond, Ham, Petersham). Continue past Ham Common and the Dysart Arms pub before turning left on the (A307) (signposted Richmond Town & Twickenham). Follow Petersham Road for 900m before arrival. BY T U B E Richmond upon Thames is served by the District Line. BY R A I L London Waterloo station can be reached directly in 20 EAST minutes allowing good connections to the city and TWICKENHAM 2 1 West End. The service also runs to Reading. BY B U S 3 The bus stop is immediately in front of Richmond Train Station. Number 65 heads towards Kingston, but get off at the 3rd stop (Compass Hill) in front of Richmond Brewery Stores.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Theory and the Study of Computerized Work Sites Bruno Latour in W
    Social theory and the study of computerized work sites Bruno Latour in W. J. Orlinokowski, Geoff Walsham (editors) Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, Chapman and Hall, London, pp.295-307 paper prepared for the december Cambridge '95 Conference - IT and Changes in Organizational Work English uncorrected Abstract This paper is a meditation written by an ignorant trying to understand what has changed in his field, social theory, because of the development of information technology and because of the analysis of sociologists, specialists of labor relations, of organizations, of situated cognition, etc. It starts with a simple example of ppractice and tries to analyze it by following new concepts which seems to derive from the redistribution of humans and non-humans due to the pervasiveness of computerized work sites. It then tries to list the services rendered to social theory by the studies made by much more knowledgeable colleagues. Finally, it tries to show, with a very clumsy vocabulary, how we could account in better terms than networks, for a social theory redistributed by information technology and its students. Prologue “Let us meet at 12-30 at the Eurotunnel Gate at Waterloo Station”, I had told Adam on the phone from Paris. “Allright; I will be there”, he had said, approving this quasi contract with the telephonic equivalent of a hand shake or of a signature. I could have asked him to send a confirmation fax to make doubly sure that we had agreed on the same information in spite of the one hour lag that England insists on having over the Continent (to feel closer, I guess, from the United States).
    [Show full text]
  • Global City Theory in Question: the Case of London and the Logics of Capital
    GLOBAL CITY THEORY IN QUESTION: THE CASE OF LONDON AND THE LOGICS OF CAPITAL Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Delphine Ancien, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Kevin R. Cox, Adviser Professor Nancy Ettlinger ________________________ Professor Edward J. Malecki Adviser Geography Graduate Program Professor Darla K. Munroe Copyright by Delphine Ancien 2008 ABSTRACT Since the 1980s the greater London area has been home to an increasingly large proportion of the British population, economic activities and profits; its population growth has been quite phenomenal. Many observers over the past few years have been warning that this growth threatens to be self-inhibiting. This has to do with London’s escalating housing costs. Housing shortages in turn tend to create labor shortages in low- skilled low-paying jobs as much as for middle-and-higher-income positions. This problem is quite common in large economically-booming cities, and even more so in what have been identified as ‘world’ or ‘global cities’, such New York City, Tokyo, and London. These cities are characterized, in particular, by their concentration of command and control functions of the world economy, and especially global financial functions. These have become a crucial aspect of capitalism in an era of increased globalization and financialization of capital. However, although the world city and global city literatures appear as a very important departure point for analyzing London’s housing crisis and, crucially from the standpoint of this dissertation, the ways different agents and coalitions of actors have been approaching this issue, I argue that it is necessary to go beyond the rather standard world/global city accounts that have ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • (2.57 Acres), Subject to Planning
    Exciting Development Opportunity approx. 1.04 ha (2.57 acres), subject to planning Former Chippenham Law Courts, Pewsham Way, Chippenham, Wiltshire SN15 3BF Highlights - Freehold - Approximately 2.57 acres (1.04 ha) - Former Law Courts, built circa 1996 - Good road linkages (A4/M4) - Prominent roundabout and road frontage Location Chippenham is an attractive market town and important commercial centre on the M4 corridor. The town is located approximately 14 miles from Bath, 28 miles from Bristol and only three miles south of junction 17 on the M4 motorway. Chippenham Train Station is approximately one mile to the north. The station is on the main London to Bristol railway line with regular services to London Paddington (a journey time of approximately 70 minutes). Bristol Airport is located approximately 30 miles west and Heathrow and Gatwick airports are accessible within 1.5 and two hours respectively. Chippenham is one of the major centres within North Wiltshire and provides an important location for a range of occupiers. Chippenham has a population of 44,820 as at the 2012 census and is administered by Wiltshire Council. It has over the last ten years benefitted from above average employment growth rates. The premises are located on the corner of the A4/Pewsham Way roundabout and benefits from proximity to the A350 and A4 road networks which in turn provide access to the M4 motorway. The premises are situated approximately 0.8 miles south of Chippenham town centre. Surrounding uses include dense residential to the south, north, and east, and agricultural land to the west. Approximate Site Areas (acres) Chippenham Law Courts, car park and surrounding site 2.57 acres (Indicative boundary edged red) Accommodation (approximate area sq ft) Former Law Court (GIA) 26,020 sq ft Description The site consists of a triangular parcel of land totalling approximately 2.57 acres which includes the former law courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Gateway London an International Center for Scholarship and Collaboration
    GLOBAL GATEWAY LONDON AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP AND COLLABORATION WELCOME TO NOTRE DAME The University of Notre Dame boasts a network of extraordinary facilities and programs located around the world—the Notre Dame Global Gateways. Under the aegis of Notre Dame International (NDI), the Global Gateways are academic and intellectual centers where scholars, students, and leaders from universities, government, business, and the community gather to discuss issues of topical and enduring relevance. At each Global Gateway, the Notre Dame community and its many international partners and colleagues work together to advance knowledge across all disciplines with a view to the common good. London is home to one of six Notre Dame Global Gateways, with the others located in Beijing, Chicago, Dublin, Jerusalem, and Rome. The London Global Gateway consists of two major facilities: an academic center (Fischer Hall at Trafalgar Square) and a 270-bed residence building (Conway Hall, close to the South Bank near Waterloo Station). These two facilities, located in vibrant Central London, are within easy walking distance of each other. Whether for hosting a large conference or merely for providing office space for a day or two, Fischer Hall and Conway Hall serve the needs of the Notre Dame community in London. • The Summer Engineering Program in LONDON London exposes Notre Dame students to innovative technological achievements PROGRAMS during a six-week program. • The Law Summer Program is open The London Global Gateway is active to Notre Dame and non-Notre Dame year-round, hosting a myriad of activities law students and has between 30 including graduate and undergraduate and 40 participants.
    [Show full text]
  • One Park Drive Canary Wharf, London 1
    One Park Drive Canary Wharf, London 1 One Park Drive, Canary Wharf, London The new residential district of Canary Wharf will be one of green garden spaces, riverside boardwalks and luxury waterfront living. The area is due to house 3,300 new homes, a school, parks and more. One Park Drive will be the signature building in this new destination located in the very heart of Canary Wharf, a vibrant, well-connected office, retail and nightlife area. The new district will be located just to the One Park Drive will begin as a freestanding east of the existing Canary Wharf Estate. landmark and is nothing short of an The expansion includes the redevelopment architectural triumph, designed by of 9.39 hectares of current brownfield sites. world-renowned architects Herzog & de When complete, it will incorporate Meuron. Eventually, it will form part of the 3.6 hectares of public space and gardens, streets, parks and wider urban area of this 2.7 million square feet of residential space new district in Canary Wharf. featuring 3,300 new homes, 2 million square feet of new office space and It is a unique building, designed to work 380,000 square feet of retail. on a human scale. One Park Drive is a singular building made up of three distinct zones. Each zone has its own characteristics but they work together to create an inimitable building. The three zones allow a sense of individuality in the larger development. West India Quay DLR North Dock Crossrail Place Elizabeth Line CYCLE HIRE CANADA Blackwall Basin WESTFERRY CABOT DLR ONE CANADA CHURCHILL CARTIER SQUARE SQUARE SQUARE PLACE CIRCLE CIRCUS Canary Wharf PARK DLR WOOD WHARF QUAY LOVEGROVE WALK BERNIERS Canary Wharf Canary Wharf PLACE Pier Jubilee Line Middle Dock UNION SQ.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellesley Road
    WELLESLEY ROAD Conservation Area Appraisal Consultation Draft May 2018 WELLESLEY ROAD l 2 Foreword I am pleased to present the draft Wellesley Road Conservation Area Appraisal. Wellesley Road and its surrounding streets are an important part of Chiswick and a valuable part of the heritage of the borough. This draft appraisal builds on the original conservation statements for Hounslow’s conservation areas and has been reviewed as part of a comprehensive review of Hounslow’s conservation area statements. The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an overview of historic developments and key components that contribute to the special interest. This appraisal will also identify positive and negative contributors as well as opportunities for improvement in order to inform a comprehensive understanding of the conservation area. The regeneration of the Great West Corridor and Brentford East offers the opportunity to improve the west end of Chiswick High Road through high quality new development and improved public realm. We KRSHWKLVGRFXPHQWZLOOSOD\DVLJQL¿FDQWUROHLQWKHIXWXUHPDQDJHPHQWRI:HOOHVOH\5RDG&RQVHUYDWLRQ Area and will be a guide for developers, residents and planners. We look forward to hearing your views on the draft appraisal and will amend this where appropriate, following consultation. Steve Curran Councillor Steve Curran Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Corporate Strategy, Planning and Regeneration WELLESLEY ROAD l 3 Executive Summary Presented here is the consultation draft version of the Wellesley Road Conservation Area Appraisal. The purpose of a conservation area appraisal is to provide an overview of the historic development of the area and to describe the key components that contribute to the special interest of the area.
    [Show full text]