Honoring Veterans & Victims of the Vietnam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Honoring Veterans & Victims of the Vietnam

NEWS RELEASE Arizona House of Representatives Representative Quang Nguyen (R-1) 1700 West Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Monday, March 29, 2021 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Honoring Veterans & Victims of the Vietnam War STATE CAPITOL, PHOENIX – A legislative proclamation sponsored by State Representative Quang Nguyen (R-1) was read today on the floor of the Arizona House of Representatives honoring veterans and victims of the Vietnam War: Whereas, the Vietnam War is the main conflict between North and South Vietnam, fought from 1955 to 1975, and involved the North Vietnamese Army and the Viet Cong guerrilla forces in armed conflict with the Armed Forces of the United States, allies, and the Army of the Republic of Vietnam; and Whereas, nearly three million U.S. soldiers served in-country between 1961 and 1973, serving side-by-side with the Army of the Republic of Vietnam, fighting for freedom against communist North Vietnam and the Viet Cong, who were supported by the communist nations of the Soviet Union and China; and Whereas, the cost of human life was high, with more than 58,000 American servicemembers, over 250,000 South Vietnamese soldiers, as many as two million civilians on both sides, and more than one million North Vietnamese and Viet Cong fighters who lost their lives during the course of the conflict; and Whereas, the cost of lives, and mounting opposition to the war, prompted President Richard Nixon and Congress to order the withdrawal of all American combat and support units in 1973 with the stipulation that the U.S. would return if the communist forces reinvaded South Vietnam; and Whereas, the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong reinvaded South Vietnam in the Spring of 1975, ultimately capturing the capital, Saigon, placing its people under communist control; and Whereas, further American intervention was blocked by the 93rd and 94th United States Congresses; and Whereas, according to the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, between 200,000 and 400,000 boat people died at sea, and approximately one million South Vietnamese were forced into re-education camps, including 300,000 South Vietnamese soldiers; and Whereas, the members of the Armed Forces who served bravely and faithfully in defense of South Vietnam from communism often did not receive proper treatment upon their return and in years following their service; Therefore, I, Representative Quang Nguyen, Republican, Legislative District 1, invite all of the members of the Arizona House of Representatives to join me today, March 29, 2021, National Vietnam War Veterans Day, in honoring the service and sacrifices of a generation of veterans who served in South Vietnam and throughout Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War; and to express the appreciation that veterans of the Vietnam War and their families so well deserve; and to remember the millions of victims who suffered the war’s devastating consequences, and the communist oppression and tyranny that followed. A copy of the official proclamation is attached. Quang Nguyen is a Republican member of the Arizona House of Representatives serving Legislative District 1, which includes Prescott, and portions of Yavapai and Maricopa Counties. ### .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Intelligence Memorandum
Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 ,E .._, ....,, TolLSect:ef: -1L_____ -------' 3.5(c) DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Intelligence Memorandum CAMBODIAANDTHE VIETNAMESE COMMUNISTS ... 3.5(c) 3.5(c) 29 January 1968 I Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 3.5(c) Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 3.5(c) CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence 29 January 1968 INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM Cambodia and the Vietnamese Communists A Monthly Report Contents I. Military Developments: Communist battal~ ion and regimental size units continue to operate in Cambodian territory (Paras. 1-5). It is clear that North Vietnamese forces have had bases in the Cam bodian salient since mid-1965 (Paras. 6-8). The salient, however, has never been one of the major Communist base areias .in Cambodia (Paras. 9-12). A 3.3(h)(2) Cambodian~-----~ reports Communist units in South Vietnam are receiving Chinese arms and ammuni tion from Cambodian stocks (Paras. 13--16) . More reports have been received on Cambodian rice sales to the Corru:nunists (Paras. 17-20). Cambodian smug glers are supplying explosive chemicals to the Viet Cong (Para. 21). II. Poli ti cal Developments: Sihanouk"' con cerned over possible allied action against Communists in Cambodia for sanctuary, has reverted to diplomacy to settle the cris:is (Paras. 22-27). Sihanouk has again attempted to get a satisfactory border declara tion from the US (Para. 28). Cambodia, still believ ing the Communists will prevail in South Vietnam, sees short-term advantages to an opening to the West (Para.
[Show full text]
The Vietnam War
Fact Sheet 1: Introduction- the Vietnam War Between June 1964 and December 1972 around 3500 New Zealand service personnel served in South Vietnam. Unlike the First and Second World Wars New Zealand’s contribution in terms of personnel was not huge. At its peak in 1968 the New Zealand force only numbered 543. Thirty-seven died while on active service and 187 were wounded. The Vietnam War – sometimes referred to as the Second Indochina War – lasted from 1959 to 1975. In Vietnam it is referred to as the American War. It was fought between the communist Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) and its allies, and the US-supported Republic of Vietnam in the south. It ended with the defeat of South Vietnam in April 1975. Nearly 1.5 million military personnel were killed in the war, and it is estimated that up to 2 million civilians also died. This was the first war in which New Zealand did not fight with its traditional ally, Great Britain. Our participation reflected this country’s increasingly strong defence ties with the United States and Australia. New Zealand’s involvement in Vietnam was highly controversial and attracted protest and condemnation at home and abroad. A study of New Zealand’s involvement in the Vietnam War raises a number of issues. As a historical study we want to find out what happened, why it happened and how it affected people’s lives. This war meant different things to different people. The Vietnam War was, and still is, an important part of the lives of many New Zealanders.
[Show full text]
Air America in South Vietnam I – from the Days of CAT to 1969
Air America in South Vietnam I From the days of CAT to 1969 by Dr. Joe F. Leeker First published on 11 August 2008, last updated on 24 August 2015 I) At the times of CAT Since early 1951, a CAT C-47, mostly flown by James B. McGovern, was permanently based at Saigon1 to transport supplies within Vietnam for the US Special Technical and Economic Mission, and during the early fifties, American military and economic assistance to Indochina even increased. “In the fall of 1951, CAT did obtain a contract to fly in support of the Economic Aid Mission in FIC [= French Indochina]. McGovern was assigned to this duty from September 1951 to April 1953. He flew a C-47 (B-813 in the beginning) throughout FIC: Saigon, Hanoi, Phnom Penh, Vientiane, Nhatrang, Haiphong, etc., averaging about 75 hours a month. This was almost entirely overt flying.”2 CAT’s next operations in Vietnam were Squaw I and Squaw II, the missions flown out of Hanoi in support of the French garrison at Dien Bien Phu in 1953/4, using USAF C-119s painted in the colors of the French Air Force; but they are described in the file “Working in Remote Countries: CAT in New Zealand, Thailand-Burma, French Indochina, Guatemala, and Indonesia”. Between mid-May and mid-August 54, the CAT C-119s continued dropping supplies to isolated French outposts and landed loads throughout Vietnam. When the Communists incited riots throughout the country, CAT flew ammunition and other supplies from Hanoi to Saigon, and brought in tear gas from Okinawa in August.3 Between 12 and 14 June 54, CAT captain
[Show full text]
China Versus Vietnam: an Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo
A CNA Occasional Paper China versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo With a Foreword by CNA Senior Fellow Michael McDevitt August 2014 Unlimited distribution Distribution unlimited. for public release This document contains the best opinion of the authors at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Cover Photo: South China Sea Claims and Agreements. Source: U.S. Department of Defense’s Annual Report on China to Congress, 2012. Distribution Distribution unlimited. Specific authority contracting number: E13PC00009. Copyright © 2014 CNA This work was created in the performance of Contract Number 2013-9114. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in FAR 52-227.14. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. This project was made possible by a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation Approved by: August 2014 Ken E. Gause, Director International Affairs Group Center for Strategic Studies Copyright © 2014 CNA FOREWORD This legal analysis was commissioned as part of a project entitled, “U.S. policy options in the South China Sea.” The objective in asking experienced U.S international lawyers, such as Captain Raul “Pete” Pedrozo, USN, Judge Advocate Corps (ret.),1 the author of this analysis, is to provide U.S.
[Show full text]
Vietnamese Cultural Profile
Vietnamese Cultural Profile An Initiative of Qld Partners In Culturally Appropriate Care March 2009 Published 2009 by: Diversicare PO Box 5199 WEST END Q 4101 Ph 07 3846 1099 Vietnamese Cultural Profile Thanks are given to the following people: Margaret Hess, Director, Diversicare Elizabeth Zajac, Project Officer, PICAC Hedrika Johnson Huong Kim Chau Bai ... and to all those people who have provided comment about this cultural profile. Editor: Carly Goldman Disclaimer This cultural profile is a synthesis of information from a range of sources believed to be reliable. Diversicare gives no guarantee that the said base sources are correct, and accepts no responsibility for any resultant errors contained herein or for decision and actions taken as a result and any damage. Please note there may be costs associated with some of the resources and services listed in this directory. This cultural profile received funding assistance from the Australian Government Department of Health & Ageing under the Partners In Culturally Appropriate Care Initiative, and the Queensland Government and the Australian Government under the Home And Community Care Program. Vietnamese Cultural Profile Introduction 3 Background 4 Migration Experience 4 Australian Statistics 5 Customs in Everyday Life 6 Family 9 Family Structure 9 Attitudes to Residential Care 10 Personal Hygiene 11 Bathing 11 Grooming 11 Pensions 12 Leisure and Recreation 13 Daily Routine 13 Social Groups 13 Television 14 Movies 14 Radio 14 Newspapers and Books 15 Religion 16 Important Days 16 Food and Diet 18 Meals 18 Food Sources 21 Health 22 Trauma Situations 22 Attitudes to Illness and Pain 21 Perception of Health Professionals 23 Death and Dying 24 Palliative Care 24 Death 24 Language 25 Sample Communication Card 26 Language Additional Resources 27 Bibliography 28 Correction / Addition Form 29 Introduction This profile of the Vietnamese cultural community is one of the many projects undertaken by the Queensland Partners in Culturally Appropriate Care (PICAC).
[Show full text]
US-Vietnam Relations in 2013
U.S.-Vietnam Relations in 2013: Current Issues and Implications for U.S. Policy Mark E. Manyin Specialist in Asian Affairs June 19, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40208 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S.-Vietnam Relations in 2013: Current Issues and Implications for U.S. Policy Summary After communist North Vietnam’s victory over U.S.-backed South Vietnam in 1975, the United States and Vietnam had minimal relations until the mid-1990s. Since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1995, overlapping security and economic interests have led the two sides to expand relations across a wide range of issue-areas and begin to form a strategic partnership of sorts. Perhaps most prominently, in 2010, the two countries mobilized a multinational response to China’s perceived attempts to boost its claims to disputed waters and islands in the South China Sea. This coordinated effort to promote the freedom of navigation has continued. U.S. Interests In the United States, voices favoring improved relations have included those reflecting U.S. business interests in Vietnam’s growing economy and U.S. strategic interests in expanding cooperation with a populous country—Vietnam has over 90 million people—that has an ambivalent relationship with China and that is asserting itself on the regional stage. Others argue that improvements in bilateral relations should be conditioned upon Vietnam’s authoritarian government improving its record on human rights. The population of more than 1 million Vietnamese-Americans, as well as legacies of the Vietnam War, also drive continued U.S.
[Show full text]
South Vietnam
SOUTH VIETNAM Polity5 regime codes: fac scode polity pers bmon bday byear emon eday eyear exrec exconst polcomp 1X RVN -3 8 10 26 1955 11 1 1963 3 3 6 1Xa RVN -3 2 11 2 1963 6 11 1965 4 1 6 1Xb RVN -66 8 6 12 1965 3 29 1973 -66 -66 -66 1Xc RVN -77 3 3 30 1973 12 31 1975 -77 -77 -77 PITF Problem Events: 1) 01/58-04/75 (REV 01/58-04/75; GEN 01/65-04/75) 1X) Date of Change to Factional-Autocratic: October 26, 1955 (independence) Brief Explanation of Change To: The nationalist resistance to French occupation eventually led to a settlement through the Geneva Accords between the French government and Viet Minh representatives. According to the agreement, the country was divided between communist (north) and non-communist (south), led by Ngo Dinh Diem. The agreement also called for an election to be held by July 1956 to bring the two provisional zones under a unified government. However, the South Vietnamese Government refused to accept this provision and, on October 26, 1955, South Vietnam declared itself the Republic of Vietnam. In attempts to consolidate his power, Diem eliminated pro-French elements in the military and suppressed the local autonomy of other religious and political groups. Diem removed Bao Dai as chief of state and made himself president of the Republic in a government-manipulated referendum in October 1955. The Government scheduled general elections for a Constituent Assembly to be held on March 4, 1956. Diem, however, barred communist sympathizers from participating in the elections.
[Show full text]
Influence of Media on Vietnam War
UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI Pedagogická fakulta Katedra anglického jazyka HANA ČIHÁNKOVÁ III. ročník – prezenční studium Obor: Anglický jazyk se zaměřením na vzdělávání - Společenské vědy se zaměřením na vzdělávání INFLUENCE OF MEDIA ON VIETNAM WAR Bakalářská práce Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Světlana Obenausová, MLitt, Ph.D OLOMOUC 2014 1 Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalářskou práci vypracoval samostatně a použil pouze uvedených pramenů a literatury. V Olomouci dne 22. 4. 2014 . Hana Čihánková 2 I would like to thank PhDr. Světlana Obenausová, MLitt, Ph.D. for her tireless support throughout the writing process. 3 Content List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 5 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 7 1 Vietnam War ....................................................................................................................... 8 2 Development of media ...................................................................................................... 10 3 Early Years ........................................................................................................................ 13 3.1 The Kennedy Administration .......................................................................................
[Show full text]
Humanitarian Intervention: the Invasion of Cambodia
NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 2 | Issue 1 Article 8 1980 Humanitarian Intervention: The nI vasion of Cambodia James Lutfy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lutfy, James (1980) "Humanitarian Intervention: The nI vasion of Cambodia," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 2 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol2/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION: THE INVASION OF CAMBODIA "'My people have no food, no medicine, and we are being killed,' he said, getting angrier as he went on. 'What does the United Nations mean? Why don't they do something?' "" On April 17, 1975, the bombing finally stopped. 2 The people of Phnom Penh listened to the silence and rejoiced. They were tired of war's misery and, although they did not support the Khmer Rouge, 3 they enthusiastically -reeted these victors who brought with them the illusion of peace as they marched into the city. This enthusiasm was short-lived, followed by suffering of such intensity that it shocked the world. The blueprint of the Khmer Rouge called for the radical re- molding of Cambodian society. 4 The Khmer Rouge had "resolved to annul the past and obliterate the present... [in order] to fashion 1. N.Y. Times, Oct. 12, 1979, at AI, col.
[Show full text]
A Keport Jor
II;rERANS AFFAI RS ' R E P UB l ~ C OF VIETNAM A Keport jor AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEi;lT OF 'STATE APRIL'i967 VETERANS AFFAIRS REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM I A Report for AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF STATE by RALPH T. CASTEEL and A.H. CORLEY, JR. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION ADVISORS TO USAID MISSION TO VIETNAM APRIL 1967 VETERANS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20420 April 28, 1967 Honorable William S. Gaud Administrator, Agency for International Development Department of State Washington, D. C. 20523 Dear Mr. Administrator: In response to your agency's request of September 19 and October 11, 1966 to the Administrator of Veterans Affairs, the undersigned were detailed to the A.I.D. Mission to Vietnam on October 21, 1966, to assist. in developing an overall plan in veterans' affairs suitable to Vietnam. We are pleased to transmit to you this report, thus completing our mission with your agency. The recommendations in this report have been reviewed with A.I.D. officials in both Saigon and Washington, and with key VA officials. Also, copies of an interim report containing the same recommendations were furnished the Public Administration Branch, Far East Bureau, A.I.D. on March 31, 1967. The recommendations presented in this report, however, are solely ours and are based on our "an-site" ap praisal and analysis of veterans' affairs in the Republic of Vietnam. The proposals presented are considered practical for implemen tation. The effect of these programs would, in our opinion, further U. S. policy in the Republic of Vietnam as well as provide for the individual member of the Armed Forces of that Nation a sense of security he does not currently possess.
[Show full text]
Vietnam – Alberta Relations
Vietnam – Alberta Relations This map is a generalized illustration only and is not intended to be used for reference purposes. The representation of political boundaries does not necessarily reflect the position of the Government of Alberta on international issues of recognition, sovereignty or jurisdiction. PROFILE committed itself to a stable and Development Agency (CIDA)-funded predictable rules-based trade regime Vietnam-Judicial Development and Capital: Hanoi including specific commitments for Grassroots Engagement (JUDGE) Population: 88.8 million (2012 est.) tariffs on goods and services. Project. This five-year (2006-2011) Vietnam’s commitment to establishing a project aimed to strengthen the Language: Vietnamese (official), dispute resolution agency governed by capacity of the Vietnamese legal- English, French and Chinese common international law may be a key judicial sector in support of more transparency and accountability. Government: Communist State, one- component in increasing foreign Alberta shared its expertise in court party rule investment. administration and procedural reform. Vietnam became a member of the Asia Head of State: President Truong Tan Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) in COMMUNITY SANG (since July 25, 2011) 1998 and hosted the 2006 APEC Approximately 25,100 Albertans are of Head of Government: Prime Minister Summit in Hanoi. Canada is also a Vietnamese descent. Nguyen Tan DUNG (since June 27, 2006) member of this 21-member regional Between 2006 and 2010, 11,447 forum, established in 1989, to further immigrants from Vietnam chose Alberta Currency: $1CDN = 20,408 Dong (VND) enhance economic growth and (October 2013) as their destination. Approximately prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region. 17% were economic immigrants.
[Show full text]
The United States Gave up on Vietnam in 1968. Getting out Was Harder Than Getting In
merican involvement in Vietnamese Army and the Viet Cong Lyndon B. Johnson announced a unilateral Vietnam split sharply into struck at more than 100 locations all bombing halt in Vietnam and said he two parts. Up to 1968, over South Vietnam, including the US would not run for re-election. He said the the United States was Embassy in Saigon. The offensive was US was “prepared to move immediately trying to win the war soundly defeated but the political damage toward peace through negotiations.” andA believed that it could do so. After was overwhelming. Richard M. Nixon inherited the 1968, the driving objective was to get out. Tet revealed the untruth of assurances commitment when he took ofﬁ ce in The withdrawal stretched out for an- by the White House and Military January 1969. “We were clearly on the other five years. Active US involvement Assistance Command Vietnam that the way out of Vietnam by negotiation if finally ended with the Linebacker II war was almost won. Two months possible, by unilateral withdrawal if “Christmas bombing” of North Vietnam previously, MACV commander Gen. necessary,” said Nixon’s national security in December 1972, which led to the William C. Westmoreland said in a advisor, Henry Kissinger. Paris Peace Accords and a cease-fire in speech at the National Press Club that Nixon refused to simply cut and run. January 1973. More than a third of the the enemy was “certainly losing” and That would dishonor the sacriﬁ ce of US 58,000 US war dead in Vietnam were that their hopes were “bankrupt.” casualties in Vietnam and undermine killed after 1968.
[Show full text]