DOCSLIB.ORG

From Quadratic Reciprocity to Langlands' Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Quadratic Reciprocity to Langlands' Program From quadratic reciprocity equation for any integer m is equivalent to solving to Langlands' program the equation in the p-adic integers for all primes p. In addition to the prime solutions the existence of a A major task in mathematics is to solve equa- solution over the real numbers R is of course a neces- tions. Early sources, like the Rhind Papyrus, writ- sary condition in order to have a solution over Z. ten around 1650 BCE by Ahmes, contains methods The p-adic integers is defined as an inverse limit, for solving linear equations. Rational numbers and and has the corresponding "completion" topology. complex numbers were created to solve certain equa- The topology can be defined via the p-adic metric; tions. And still today, equations and their solutions in various number systems, continue to be an excel- Definition 1. For a rational number lent source of new knowledge, in mathematics as well pαm as in other scientific disciplins. q = n Finding integer solutions of equations is of par- ticular interest to mathematicians. This problem is where n and m are not divisible by p, the p-adic met- closely related to the many attempts at understand- ric of q is given by ing the most basic mathematical object, the natu- −α ral numbers; N = f1; 2; 3;::: g. The additive struc- jqjp = p ture of the natural numbers is easily accessible; ev- ery positive integer is obtained from 1 by repeated It follows that two natural numbers are p-close (i.e., addition. The multiplicative structure is more sub- with respect to the p-adic metric) if their difference tle. The prime numbers 2; 3; 5;; 7;::: , which are the is divisible by a high power of p. In this way 14 multiplicative basis for the natural numbers, are still and 15 are not so 2-close since their difference is not hiding a lot of secrets; e.g. how to efficiently decide divisible by any positive power of 2, while 31 and 63 with difference 63 − 31 = 32 = 25 are much 2-closer. whether a given number is a prime or not. ^ A first attempt to decide whether a polynomial We can localize Zp in the multiplicative set of non- ^ zero elements to obtain the p-adic numbers p. equation P (x1; : : : ; xn) = 0 has an integer solution Q is to reduce the problem modulo m, i.e. look for The real numbers R is the completion of the rational numbers with respect to the ordinary norm. We solutions in the ring Zm = f0; 1; 2; : : : ; m − 1g for Q various positive integers m. By using the Chinese use the notation jqj1 for this norm, and call R the ^ Remainder Theorem this is equivalent to the prob- completion of Q at the ”infinite” prime, i.e. R = Q1. ^ lem of finding solutions modulo powers pk, where p Each Qp, p ≤ 1, is called a "local field”, and Q it- is a prime and k ≥ 1. Solving the congruence (this self a "global" field. The Hasse-Minkowski Theorem is the technical term for an equation when we work gives a positive example of the local-global princi- modulo an integer) ple: A statement is valid over Q if and only if it is ^ valid over all local fields Qp for p ≤ 1. k P (x1; : : : ; xn) ≡ 0 (mod p ) Theorem 2 (Hasse-Minkowski). Let Q be a non- is called a "local" problem since we focus on one prime degenerate quadratic form. Then or "place" p 2 Z at a time. The counterpart is a "global" problem, where we solve the equation over Q(x1; : : : ; xn) = 0 the integers Z. Kurt Hensel (1861-1941) reformulated the local has a non-trivial integer solution if and only if it has problem i 1897 by introducing the p-adic integers; a real solution and a p-adic solution for every prime p. ^ = lim =pk Zp − Z Z Notice that the Hasse-Minkowski Theorem tells us k something about quadratic polynomials. The result a construction which embraces all powers pk, for is not true for polynomials of higher degree. It was k ≥ 1. Hensel's reformulation says that solving the already known in 1909 that the Fermat equation xn + yn = zn has p-adic solutions for all p. But as we now The Legendre symbol can be computed by Euler's for- know, there are no non-trivial integer solutions. mula, introduced by Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) in Another example of an equation which is solvable 1748: locally, but not globally was found by Ernst Selmer (1920-2006) in 1951. It is given by the formula Theorem 5. Let p be an odd prime and d an integer. Then we have 3x3 + 4y3 + 5z3 = 0 d p−1 ≡ d 2 (mod p) and Selmer showed that this equation can be solved p modulo p for any prime p, as well as over R, but there An immediate and useful consequence of Euler's are still no solutions in Z. formula is the fact that ( An innocent looking equation which has drawn a −1 1 if p ≡ 1 (mod 4) = lot of attention throughout history is the quadratic p −1 if p ≡ 3 (mod 4) equation x2 = d; Euler's criterion is easily proved using Fermat's little theorem, where d is a positive integer. The equation has an dp−1 ≡ 1 (mod p) integer solution if and only if d is a perfect square. Assume d is not a perfect square. Then by the Rewriting this as Hasse-Minkowski Theorem we know that for some p−1 p−1 prime p the congruence (d 2 − 1)(d 2 + 1) ≡ 0 (mod p) x2 ≡ d (mod pk) and using the fact that p is prime, we deduce that one of the factors has to be congruent to 0 (mod p). fails to have a solution, i.e., for some prime power If d is a quadratic residue, i.e., x2 ≡ d (mod p) for pk the number d fails to be a quadratic residue. some x, then Adrien-Marie Legendre (1752-1833) reformulated p−1 2 p−1 p−1 this statement in a symbolic way: d 2 ≡ (x ) 2 ≡ x ≡ 1 (mod p) Definition 3. Let p be an odd prime and d an inte- which makes the first factor equal to 0. Since the d 2 ger. The Legendre symbol p is defined as polynomial x − d has degree 2, it can have at most two roots, x and −x. Thus there are at least p−1 8 2 1 if x2 ≡ d (mod p) is solvable non-zero quadratic residues. On the other hand the d <> = −1 if x2 ≡ d (mod p) is not solvable polynomial p p−1 :>0 if p divides d x 2 − 1 p−1 can have at most 2 non-zero roots. It follows that The Legendre symbol is multiplicative and p- p−1 periodic in the top argument. It can be shown that the remaining 2 non-quadratic residue classes must the symbols satisfy the quadratic reciprocity law: be roots of the second factor, i.e., satisfying p−1 Theorem 4. Let p and q be two odd primes. Then d 2 ≡ −1 (mod p) p−1 p q (p−1)(q−1) Thus we have d 2 ≡ ±1 (mod p), depending on = (−1) 4 q p whether d is a quadratic residue modulo p or not. The special value for the prime p = 2 is given by A general framework for describing solutions of 2 p2−1 polynomial equations was introduced by Evariste´ = (−1) 8 p Galois (1811-1832) in 1832, a few days before he p p died from wounds suffered in a duel, only 20 years of v + w d 2 Fp[ d]. We have age. Given a polynomial with integer coefficients, we p p can extend the rational numbers by the the solutions (v + w d)p = vp + wp( d)p of the equation (found among complex numbers) to p−1 p = v + wd 2 d form a field extension E of the rational numbers Q. Galois' idea was to consider automorphisms of the ex- p−1 Thus we are interested in the value of d 2 (mod p). tended field fixing the rational numbers, and thereby From Fermat's little theorem we have fixing the polynomial itself. The set of such automor- p p−1 p−1 phisms forms a group, the so-called Galois group 0 = d − d = d · (d 2 − 1)(d 2 + 1) G(E=Q) of the field extension. The Galois groups have a rich structure which reflects a lot of properties and since Fp is a field, one of the three factors must of the original polynomial equation; e.g., the Galois vanish. Our assumption that p does not divide 2d group is trivial if and only if the polynomial splits excludes the first factor, and we are left with the other completely in linear factors with integer coefficients. two. For p−1 The equation x2 −d = 0 has at most two roots, and d 2 = 1; thep only possible non-trivial automorphism ofpE = the Frobenius map is the identity, while for Q( d) fixing Q is the conjugation map σ : d 7! p p−1 − d. Thus the Galois group in this case is the unique d 2 = −1; 2 group of two elements, Z2 = fId; σg where σ = Id. the Frobenius map corresponds to the conjugation The group Z2 also appears in an arithmetic con- p p ∗ automorphism σ : d 7! − d.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 8 Complete Fields and Valuation Rings
    18.785 Number theory I Fall 2016 Lecture #8 10/04/2016 8 Complete fields and valuation rings In order to make further progress in our investigation of finite extensions L=K of the fraction field K of a Dedekind domain A, and in particular, to determine the primes p of K that ramify in L, we introduce a new tool that will allows us to \localize" fields. We have already seen how useful it can be to localize the ring A at a prime ideal p. This process transforms A into a discrete valuation ring Ap; the DVR Ap is a principal ideal domain and has exactly one nonzero prime ideal, which makes it much easier to study than A. By Proposition 2.7, the localizations of A at its prime ideals p collectively determine the ring A. Localizing A does not change its fraction field K. However, there is an operation we can perform on K that is analogous to localizing A: we can construct the completion of K with respect to one of its absolute values. When K is a global field, this process yields a local field (a term we will define in the next lecture), and we can recover essentially everything we might want to know about K by studying its completions. At first glance taking completions might seem to make things more complicated, but as with localization, it actually simplifies matters considerably. For those who have not seen this construction before, we briefly review some background material on completions, topological rings, and inverse limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Survey on Large Fields – Old & New –
    Little survey on large fields { Old & New { Florian Pop ∗ Abstract. The large fields were introduced by the author in [59] and subsequently acquired several other names. This little survey includes earlier and new developments, and at the end of each section we mention a few open questions. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 12E, 12F, 12G, 12J. Secondary 12E30, 12F10, 12G99. Keywords. Large fields, ultraproducts, PAC, pseudo closed fields, Henselian pairs, elementary equivalence, algebraic varieties, rational points, function fields, (inverse) Galois theory, embedding problems, model theory, rational connectedness, extremal fields. Introduction The notion of large field was introduced in Pop [59] and proved to be the \right class" of fields over which one can do a lot of interesting mathematics, like (inverse) Galois theory, see Colliot-Th´el`ene[7], Moret-Bailly [45], Pop [59], [61], the survey article Harbater [30], study torsors of finite groups Moret- Bailly [46], study rationally connected varieties Koll´ar[37], study the elementary theory of function fields Koenigsmann [35], Poonen{Pop [55], characterize extremal valued fields as introduced by Ershov [12], see Azgin{Kuhlmann{Pop [1], etc. Maybe that is why the \large fields” acquired several other names |google it: ´epais,fertile, weite K¨orper, ample, anti-Mordellic. Last but not least, see Jarden's book [34] for more about large fields (which he calls \ample fields” in his book [34]), and Kuhlmann [41] for relations between large fields and local uniformization (`ala Zariski). Definition. A field k is called a large field, if for every irreducible k-curve C the following holds: If C has a k-rational smooth point, then C has infinitely many k-rational points.
    [Show full text]
  • Local-Global Methods in Algebraic Number Theory
    LOCAL-GLOBAL METHODS IN ALGEBRAIC NUMBER THEORY ZACHARY KIRSCHE Abstract. This paper seeks to develop the key ideas behind some local-global methods in algebraic number theory. To this end, we first develop the theory of local fields associated to an algebraic number field. We then describe the Hilbert reciprocity law and show how it can be used to develop a proof of the classical Hasse-Minkowski theorem about quadratic forms over algebraic number fields. We also discuss the ramification theory of places and develop the theory of quaternion algebras to show how local-global methods can also be applied in this case. Contents 1. Local fields 1 1.1. Absolute values and completions 2 1.2. Classifying absolute values 3 1.3. Global fields 4 2. The p-adic numbers 5 2.1. The Chevalley-Warning theorem 5 2.2. The p-adic integers 6 2.3. Hensel's lemma 7 3. The Hasse-Minkowski theorem 8 3.1. The Hilbert symbol 8 3.2. The Hasse-Minkowski theorem 9 3.3. Applications and further results 9 4. Other local-global principles 10 4.1. The ramification theory of places 10 4.2. Quaternion algebras 12 Acknowledgments 13 References 13 1. Local fields In this section, we will develop the theory of local fields. We will first introduce local fields in the special case of algebraic number fields. This special case will be the main focus of the remainder of the paper, though at the end of this section we will include some remarks about more general global fields and connections to algebraic geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Branching Laws for Classical Groups: the Non-Tempered Case
    BRANCHING LAWS FOR CLASSICAL GROUPS: THE NON-TEMPERED CASE WEE TECK GAN, BENEDICT H. GROSS AND DIPENDRA PRASAD August 18, 2020 ABSTRACT. This paper generalizes the GGP conjectures which were earlier formulated for tempered or more generally generic L-packets to Arthur packets, especially for the nongeneric L-packets arising from Arthur parameters. The paper introduces the key no- tionof a relevant pair of A-parameters which governs the branching laws for GLn and all classical groups overboth local fields and global fields. It plays a role for all the branching problems studied in [GGP] including Bessel models and Fourier-Jacobi models. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Notation and Preliminaries 8 3. Relevant Pair of A-Parameters 10 4. Correlator 12 5. Local Conjecture for GLn 15 6. Local Conjecture for Classical Groups 23 7. A Conjecture for A-packets 25 8. A Special Case of the Conjecture 31 9. Global Conjecture 34 10. Revisiting the Global Conjecture 43 11. Low Rank Examples 46 12. Automorphic Descent 55 13. L-functions: GL case 59 14. L-functions: Classical Groups 63 References 67 arXiv:1911.02783v2 [math.RT] 17 Aug 2020 1. INTRODUCTION This paper is a sequel to our earlier work [GP1, GP2, GGP, GGP2], which discussed several restriction (or branching) problems in the representation theory of classical groups. In the local case, the conjectural answer was given in terms of symplectic root numbers 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 11F70; Secondary 22E55. WTG is partially supported by an MOE Tier 2 grant R146-000-233-112. DP thanks Science and En- gineering research board of the Department of Science and Technology, India for its support through the JC Bose National Fellowship of the Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • Number Theory
    Number Theory Alexander Paulin October 25, 2010 Lecture 1 What is Number Theory Number Theory is one of the oldest and deepest Mathematical disciplines. In the broadest possible sense Number Theory is the study of the arithmetic properties of Z, the integers. Z is the canonical ring. It structure as a group under addition is very simple: it is the infinite cyclic group. The mystery of Z is its structure as a monoid under multiplication and the way these two structure coalesce. As a monoid we can reduce the study of Z to that of understanding prime numbers via the following 2000 year old theorem. Theorem. Every positive integer can be written as a product of prime numbers. Moreover this product is unique up to ordering. This is 2000 year old theorem is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic. In modern language this is the statement that Z is a unique factorization domain (UFD). Another deep fact, due to Euclid, is that there are infinitely many primes. As a monoid therefore Z is fairly easy to understand - the free commutative monoid with countably infinitely many generators cross the cyclic group of order 2. The point is that in isolation addition and multiplication are easy, but together when have vast hidden depth. At this point we are faced with two potential avenues of study: analytic versus algebraic. By analytic I questions like trying to understand the distribution of the primes throughout Z. By algebraic I mean understanding the structure of Z as a monoid and as an abelian group and how they interact.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction. There Are at Least Three Different Problems with Which One Is Confronted in the Study of L-Functions: the Analytic
    L-Functions and Automorphic Representations∗ R. P. Langlands Introduction. There are at least three different problems with which one is confronted in the study of L•functions: the analytic continuation and functional equation; the location of the zeroes; and in some cases, the determination of the values at special points. The first may be the easiest. It is certainly the only one with which I have been closely involved. There are two kinds of L•functions, and they will be described below: motivic L•functions which generalize the Artin L•functions and are defined purely arithmetically, and automorphic L•functions, defined by data which are largely transcendental. Within the automorphic L• functions a special class can be singled out, the class of standard L•functions, which generalize the Hecke L•functions and for which the analytic continuation and functional equation can be proved directly. For the other L•functions the analytic continuation is not so easily effected. However all evidence indicates that there are fewer L•functions than the definitions suggest, and that every L•function, motivic or automorphic, is equal to a standard L•function. Such equalities are often deep, and are called reciprocity laws, for historical reasons. Once a reciprocity law can be proved for an L•function, analytic continuation follows, and so, for those who believe in the validity of the reciprocity laws, they and not analytic continuation are the focus of attention, but very few such laws have been established. The automorphic L•functions are defined representation•theoretically, and it should be no surprise that harmonic analysis can be applied to some effect in the study of reciprocity laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Arithmetic Deformation Theory Via Arithmetic Fundamental Groups and Nonarchimedean Theta-Functions, Notes on the Work of Shinichi Mochizuki
    ARITHMETIC DEFORMATION THEORY VIA ARITHMETIC FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND NONARCHIMEDEAN THETA-FUNCTIONS, NOTES ON THE WORK OF SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI IVAN FESENKO ABSTRACT. These notes survey the main ideas, concepts and objects of the work by Shinichi Mochizuki on inter- universal Teichmüller theory [31], which might also be called arithmetic deformation theory, and its application to diophantine geometry. They provide an external perspective which complements the review texts [32] and [33]. Some important developments which preceded [31] are presented in the first section. Several key aspects of arithmetic deformation theory are discussed in the second section. Its main theorem gives an inequality–bound on the size of volume deformation associated to a certain log-theta-lattice. The application to several fundamental conjectures in number theory follows from a further direct computation of the right hand side of the inequality. The third section considers additional related topics, including practical hints on how to study the theory. This text was published in Europ. J. Math. (2015) 1:405–440. CONTENTS Foreword 2 1. The origins 2 1.1. From class field theory to reconstructing number fields to coverings of P1 minus three points2 1.2. A development in diophantine geometry3 1.3. Conjectural inequalities for the same property4 1.4. A question posed to a student by his thesis advisor6 1.5. On anabelian geometry6 2. On arithmetic deformation theory8 2.1. Texts related to IUT8 2.2. Initial data 9 2.3. A brief outline of the proof and a list of some of the main concepts 10 2.4. Mono-anabelian geometry and multiradiality 12 2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Structure of Galois Groups As Galois Modules
    ON THE STRUCTURE OF GALOIS GROUPS AS GALOIS MODULES Uwe Jannsen Fakult~t f~r Mathematik Universit~tsstr. 31, 8400 Regensburg Bundesrepublik Deutschland Classical class field theory tells us about the structure of the Galois groups of the abelian extensions of a global or local field. One obvious next step is to take a Galois extension K/k with Galois group G (to be thought of as given and known) and then to investigate the structure of the Galois groups of abelian extensions of K as G-modules. This has been done by several authors, mainly for tame extensions or p-extensions of local fields (see [10],[12],[3] and [13] for example and further literature) and for some infinite extensions of global fields, where the group algebra has some nice structure (Iwasawa theory). The aim of these notes is to show that one can get some results for arbitrary Galois groups by using the purely algebraic concept of class formations introduced by Tate. i. Relation modules. Given a presentation 1 + R ÷ F ÷ G~ 1 m m of a finite group G by a (discrete) free group F on m free generators, m the factor commutator group Rabm = Rm/[Rm'R m] becomes a finitely generated Z[G]-module via the conjugation in F . By Lyndon [19] and m Gruenberg [8]§2 we have 1.1. PROPOSITION. a) There is an exact sequence of ~[G]-modules (I) 0 ÷ R ab + ~[G] m ÷ I(G) + 0 , m where I(G) is the augmentation ideal, defined by the exact sequence (2) 0 + I(G) ÷ Z[G] aug> ~ ÷ 0, aug( ~ aoo) = ~ a .
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Galois Cohomology—Modularity Seminar
    Notes on Galois Cohomology—Modularity seminar Rebecca Bellovin 1 Introduction We’ve seen that the tangent space to a deformation functor is a Galois coho- mology group H1, and we’ll see that obstructions to a deformation problem will be in H2. So if we want to know things like the dimension of R or whether a deformation functor is smooth, we need to be able to get our hands on the cohomology groups. Secondarily, if we want to “deform sub- ject to conditions”, we’ll want to express the tangent space and obstruction space of those functors as cohomology groups, and cohomology groups we can compute in terms of an unrestricted deformation problem. For the most part, we will assume the contents of Serre’s Local Fields and Galois Cohomology. These cover the cases when G is finite (and discrete) and M is discrete, and G is profinite and M is discrete, respectively. References: Serre’s Galois Cohomology Neukirch’s Cohomology of Number Fields Appendix B of Rubin’s Euler Systems Washington’s article in CSS Darmon, Diamond, and Taylor (preprint on Darmon’s website) 2 Generalities Let G be a group, and let M be a module with an action by G. Both G and M have topologies; often both will be discrete (and G will be finite), 1 or G will be profinite with M discrete; or both will be profinite. We always require the action of G on M to be continuous. Let’s review group cohomology, using inhomogenous cocycles. For a topological group G and a topological G-module M, the ith group of continuous cochains Ci(G, M) is the group of continuous maps Gi → M.
    [Show full text]
  • L-Functions and Non-Abelian Class Field Theory, from Artin to Langlands
    L-functions and non-abelian class field theory, from Artin to Langlands James W. Cogdell∗ Introduction Emil Artin spent the first 15 years of his career in Hamburg. Andr´eWeil charac- terized this period of Artin's career as a \love affair with the zeta function" [77]. Claude Chevalley, in his obituary of Artin [14], pointed out that Artin's use of zeta functions was to discover exact algebraic facts as opposed to estimates or approxi- mate evaluations. In particular, it seems clear to me that during this period Artin was quite interested in using the Artin L-functions as a tool for finding a non- abelian class field theory, expressed as the desire to extend results from relative abelian extensions to general extensions of number fields. Artin introduced his L-functions attached to characters of the Galois group in 1923 in hopes of developing a non-abelian class field theory. Instead, through them he was led to formulate and prove the Artin Reciprocity Law - the crowning achievement of abelian class field theory. But Artin never lost interest in pursuing a non-abelian class field theory. At the Princeton University Bicentennial Conference on the Problems of Mathematics held in 1946 \Artin stated that `My own belief is that we know it already, though no one will believe me { that whatever can be said about non-Abelian class field theory follows from what we know now, since it depends on the behavior of the broad field over the intermediate fields { and there are sufficiently many Abelian cases.' The critical thing is learning how to pass from a prime in an intermediate field to a prime in a large field.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Field Theory and the Local-Global Property
    Class Field Theory and the Local-Global Property Noah Taylor Discussed with Professor Frank Calegari March 18, 2017 1 Classical Class Field Theory 1.1 Lubin Tate Theory In this section we derive a concrete description of a relationship between the Galois extensions of a local field K with abelian Galois groups and the open subgroups of K×. We assume that K is a finite extension of Qp, OK has maximal ideal m, and we suppose the residue field k of K has size q, a power of p. Lemma 1.1 (Hensel). If f(x) is a polynomial in O [x] and a 2 O with f(a) < 1 then there is K K f 0(a)2 some a with f(a ) = 0 and ja − a j ≤ f(a) . 1 1 1 f 0(a) f(a) Proof. As in Newton's method, we continually replace a with a− f 0(a) . Careful consideration of the valuation of f(a) shows that it decreases while f 0(a) does not, so that f(a) tends to 0. Because K is complete, the sequence of a's we get has a limit a1, and we find that f(a1) = 0. The statement about the distance between a and a1 follows immediately. We can apply this first to the polynomial f(x) = xq − x and a being any representative of any element in k to find that K contains the q − 1'st roots of unity. It also follows that if L=K is an unramified extension of degree n, then L = K(ζ) for a qn − 1'st root of unity ζ.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Notes, Global Class Field Theory Caltech, Spring 2015/16
    COURSE NOTES, GLOBAL CLASS FIELD THEORY CALTECH, SPRING 2015/16 M. FLACH 1. Global class field theory in classical terms Recall the isomorphism Z Z × −!∼ Q Q 7! 7! a ( =m ) Gal( (ζm)= ); a (ζm ζm) where ζm is a primitive m-th root of unity. This is the reciprocity isomorphism of global class field theory for the number field Q. What could a generalization of this to any number field K be? Of course one has a natural map (going the other way) ∼ × Gal(K(ζm)=K) ! Aut(µm) = (Z=mZ) ; σ 7! (ζ 7! σ(ζ)) called the cyclotomic character. It is even an isomorphism if K is linearly disjoint from Q(ζm). But that's not class field theory, or rather it's only a tiny part of class field theory for the field K. The proper, and much more stunning generalisation is a reciprocity isomorphism ∼ Hm −! Gal(K(m)=K) between so called ray class groups Hm of modulus m and Galois groups of corre- sponding finite abelian extensions K(m)=K. In a first approximation one can think of a modulus m as an integral ideal in OK but it is slightly more general. The ray m × class group H isn't just (OK =m) although the two groups are somewhat related. In any case Hm is explicit, or one should say easily computable as soon as one can O× O compute the unit group K and the class group Cl( K ) of the field K. Note that both are trivial for K = Q, so that ray class groups are particularly easy for K = Q.
    [Show full text]