DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2 0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANNUAL REPORT 2012 ANNUAL REPORT The picture on the cover: As part of the project Construction of the second track in Skrīveri – Krustpils section, building of a new bridge was commenced to replace the former one, built in 1860. Putting it into operation is foreseen in May 2013. 2012 The picture on the cover: As part of the project Construction of the second track in Skrīveri – Krustpils section, building of a new bridge was commenced to replace the ANNUAL REPORT former one, built in 1860. Putting it into operation is foreseen in May 2013. LATVIJAS DZELZCeļš 2 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS 4 MISSION, VISION AND VALUES 6 STRUCTURE 7 AREAS OF OPERATION 8 HISTORY OF DEVELOPING THE SJSC LATVIAN RAILWAY 9 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 10 CHARACTERISTICS OF OPERATIONS 10 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 12 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 17 TRAFFIC SAFETY 19 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION 27 PERSONNEL 31 COMMUNICATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 36 MUSEUM OF LATVIAN RAILWAY HISTORY 38 SUBSIDIARIES AND OPERATION THEREOF IN 2012 41 LDZ CARGO Ltd 42 LDZ INFRASTRUKTŪRA Ltd 55 LDZ RITOŠĀ SASTĀVA SERVISS Ltd 58 LDZ APSARDZE Ltd 62 FINANCIAL REPORT 64 JOINT STOCK COMPANY LATRAILNET 74 EVENTS OF THE YEAR 77 2012 3 THE RESULTS OF THE YEAR ARE GOOD THE STATE JOINT STOCK COMPANY LATVIAN RAILWAY REACHED A RECORD-HIGH PROFIT OF 25.8 MILLION LATS IN THE REPORTING YEAR The Latvian Railway (LDz) concern not only reached a record high freight transportation amount fi gure in 2012 by carrying 60.6 million tonnes of freight, but also a record high profi t by earning 25.8 million lats, which contributed to a 35.2% or 6.7 million lats more than the previous year. POSITIVE EVALUATION The audited annual report of LDz bears evidence that apart LDz has been a stable leader of the transportation business from the increase in profi t and turnover, the consolidated by the amount of freight carried per kilometre since 2005, income of the concern increased by 4.8%, reaching 334 acquiring an even larger market share last year. Most of the million lats last year and the profi tability of LDz own funds freight carried by LDz comes from the main cooperation increased to 11.8%. LDz paid 81.3 million lats in tax into Lat- partners of the company in Russia and Belarus, as well as via’s budget in 2012, including 39.2 million lats in social tax. in Kazakhstan and Lithuania. Both the government of the Republic of Latvia and the Last year was really successful to us and this success was shareholder, positively assess the accomplishment of a result of several years of purposeful work. The calcula- the company in general, however, we cannot stop at our tions of the Ministry of Transport bear evidence that the achievement – the infrastructure upgrade projects which economy of Latvia gains approximately 10 lats from each have been commenced must be accomplished, and the tonne carried by LDz and therefore we can be content that logistics systems must be upgraded in an attempt to reach the economy of our country gained approximately 600 even farther logistics centres in the East, and the planning million lats from the amount of cargoes carried last year, and development of new container transport routes must when the practically impossible was achieved in the area be implemented. of freight transport. The operational and fi nancial results of Latvian Railway Oil products and coal traditionally constitute the largest pro- confi rm that the reforms implemented at the company, the portion of cargoes. These two types of cargoes make up investment and the strategy used have been correct and more than two thirds of all cargoes. They are followed by justifi ed. LDz serves as a good example to prove that Latvia mineral fertilisers, chemicals, metals, ores and grains. can successfully export its services, thus contributing to the development of the economy. LATVIJAS DZELZCeļš 4 ANNUAL REPORT MORE INVESTMENT IN THE UPGRADE OF INFRASTRUCTURE The largest investment into the development of LDz since as a serious contribution to raising competitiveness on 2007, amounting to 86 million lats, was performed last an international level. Therefore investment of the largest year. This investment became the basis for the achieve- proportion of the profit into the development of railway ments of the last year and future development, and infrastructure is crucial. therefore LDz will continue an extensive investment pro- gramme with the objective of raising the throughput ca- The fi nancial results of 2012 can serve as an excellent pacity of the railway, the security of transportation and, precondition for the implementation of the investment pro- thus, the competitiveness of the company. The govern- gramme. The investment programme of Latvian Railway ment does not participate in the co-financing of railway provides for an investment amounting to 317.6 million lats infrastructure maintenance, which is why raising the until 2015, which is a great challenge to our company. The competitiveness of the company is a serious challenge fi nancial results of 2012 give rise to a justifi ed hope that the to LDz. The intensive investment programme will serve program will be implemented. NEW PROJECTS HAVE BEEN COMMENCED Last year LDz commenced several signifi cant railway infra- 2012 was not an easy year for us, but it was inspiring, as structure development projects. One of the largest projects we had a lot of work. The current throughput capacity of is the construction of the second railway track in the sec- the railway in Latvia is 65 million tonnes of cargo annually, tion Skrīveri – Krustpils, which is worth 65 million lats. The while in 2012 we carried 60.6 million tonnes. We plan our project will considerably improve the throughput capacity future, and our investment in infrastructure provides the and traffi c security – the trains will be able to use parallel actual basis for the increase in throughput capacity to 85 tracks in both directions instead of using the same track million tonnes per year. as previously. The project of the marshalling yard upgrade at šķirotava station was also commenced. As a result of It is important for us to prove that we are able to contribute to the implementation of the project, the processing of wagons Latvia much more by developing and upgrading the railway and formation of trains will be increased by 30% daily, re- network. This achievement is possible and we would like sulting in more than 3,000 wagons being processed daily. the public to understand – if we build railway tracks, if we A project aimed at the development of the left bank of the electrify the railway, we do it in the interests of the state and River Daugava was also commenced during the reporting the people of Latvia. year. The modernisation of the signalisation and commu- nication system at the station Bolderāja – 1, as well as the construction of a new Bolderāja – 2 station is planned within UĢIS MAGONIS, the framework of this project. President of the State Joint Stock Company Latvian Railway While planning LDz development and the future growth of the company, LDz has come to an agreement with the Latvian Rail and Transport Industry Trade Union, providing for considerably more favourable work conditions to its employees. Being aware that in the labour market LDz is involved in fi erce competition, not only with Latvian, but also European employers, we understand the necessity to invest in our employees – since a good employee is a loyal employee, who feels secure about its future, an employee, who feels allegiance with the company and who feels ex- pected there. This might be the reason why the residents of Latvia have ranked LDz as the holder of 3rd position in the top of the most desired employers of the transport and logistics sector. MISSION VISION VALUES MISSION TO ENSURE THE MANAGEMENT OF THE RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE AND RAILWAY TRANSPORT IN THE INTERESTS OF THE ECONOMY OF LATVIA VISION TO BECOME A PROGRESSIVE, SAFE AND EFFICIENT RAILWAY COMPANY VALUES COMPETENCE. RESPONSIBILITY. SECURITY. INITIATIVE. COOPERATION LATVIJAS DZELZCeļš 6 ANNUAL REPORT STRUCTURE LEADING COMPANY: State Joint Stock Company Latvian Railway ensures the maintenance of railway tracks, control of train traffi c, operation of railway stations, real estate management services, hiring of rolling stock, distribution and sales of electricity, information technology and electronic communication services. STATE JOINT STOCK COMPANY LATVIJAS DZELZCEĻŠ LDZ RITOŠĀ LDZ CARGO LDZ INFRASTRUKTŪRA LDZ APSARDZE JSC SASTĀVA SERVISS Ltd Ltd Ltd LATRAILNET Ltd LDZ CARGO loģistika Ltd SUBSIDIARIES: LDZ Cargo Ltd deals with domestic and international rail freight transportation, loading, unloading and storage of cargoes, management of warehousing facilities, organises interna- tional passenger transport. Subsidiary: LDZ Cargo Loģistika Ltd a subsidiary of LDZ Cargo Ltd dealing with the attraction of new freight fl ows and the facilitation of rail cargo transport between European and Asian countries and the provision of forwarding services. LDZ infrastruktūra Ltd deals with the construction of railway tracks and the major overhaul thereof. LDZ ritošā sastāva serviss Ltd deals with the repair, equipping and upgrading of locomotives and railway cars. LDZ apsardze Ltd provides security services to the companies of Latvian Railway, as well as private individuals, companies, public organisations, state institutions and municipalities. JSC LatRailNet determines the charge for the use of railway infrastructure, distributes the capacity of the railway infrastructure and takes decisions regarding the assigning of the trains of a particular carrier. 7 AREAS OF OPERATION THE OBJECTIVE AND TASKS OF THE ANNUAL REPORT The annual report summarises the information on the operations of the State Joint Stock Company Latvian Railway and the companies of the group: LDZ infrastruktūra Ltd, LDZ ritošā sastāva serviss Ltd, LDZ apsardze Ltd, LDZ Cargo Ltd and a subsidiary LDZ Cargo Ltd Loģistika, the Joint Stock Company LatRailNet in 2012.
Recommended publications
  • The Myth of the Standard Gauge

    The Myth of the Standard Gauge

    The Myth of the Standard Guage: Rail Guage Choice in Australia, 1850-1901 Author Mills, John Ayres Published 2007 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith Business School DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/426 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366364 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au THE MYTH OF THE STANDARD GAUGE: RAIL GAUGE CHOICE IN AUSTRALIA, 1850 – 1901 JOHN AYRES MILLS B.A.(Syd.), M.Prof.Econ. (U.Qld.) DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, FINANCE & ECONOMICS GRIFFITH BUSINESS SCHOOL GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2006 ii ABSTRACT This thesis describes the rail gauge decision-making processes of the Australian colonies in the period 1850 – 1901. Federation in 1901 delivered a national system of railways to Australia but not a national railway system. Thus the so-called “standard” gauge of 4ft. 8½in. had not become the standard in Australia at Federation in 1901, and has still not. It was found that previous studies did not examine cause and effect in the making of rail gauge choices. This study has done so, and found that rail gauge choice decisions in the period 1850 to 1901 were not merely one-off events. Rather, those choices were part of a search over fifty years by government representatives seeking colonial identity/autonomy and/or platforms for election/re-election. Consistent with this interpretation of the history of rail gauge choice in the Australian colonies, no case was found where rail gauge choice was a function of the disciplined search for the best value-for-money option.
  • Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments

    Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments

    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments Lobyrev, Vitaly and Tikhomirov, Andrey and Tsukarev, Taras and Vinokurov, Evgeny Eurasian Development Bank, Institute of Economy and Transport Development 10 May 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86705/ MPRA Paper No. 86705, posted 18 May 2018 16:33 UTC BELT AND ROAD TRANSPORT CORRIDORS: BARRIERS AND INVESTMENTS Authors: Vitaly Lobyrev; Andrey Tikhomirov (Institute of Economy and Transport Development); Taras Tsukarev, PhD (Econ); Evgeny Vinokurov, PhD (Econ) (EDB Centre for Integration Studies). This report presents the results of an analysis of the impact that international freight traffic barriers have on logistics, transit potential, and development of transport corridors traversing EAEU member states. The authors of EDB Centre for Integration Studies Report No. 49 maintain that, if current railway freight rates and Chinese railway subsidies remain in place, by 2020 container traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis may reach 250,000 FEU. At the same time, long-term freight traffic growth is restricted by a number of internal and external factors. The question is: What can be done to fully realise the existing trans-Eurasian transit potential? Removal of non-tariff and technical barriers is one of the key target areas. Restrictions discussed in this report include infrastructural (transport and logistical infrastructure), border/customs-related, and administrative/legal restrictions. The findings of a survey conducted among European consignors is a valuable source of information on these subjects. The authors present their recommendations regarding what can be done to remove the barriers that hamper international freight traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis.
  • ILNAS-EN 13803:2017 E

    ILNAS-EN 13803:2017 E

    p o h S - e S A ILN a i v y p o C y l n voie -Écartement1435mmetpluslarge Paramètres deconceptiondutracéla o alignment designparameters-Track Trassierungsparameter -Spurweiten1 Railway applications-Track w ie v e Applications ferroviaires-Voie Bahnanwendungen -Oberbau r gauges 1435mmandwider P - ILNAS-EN 13803:2017 2017 435 mmundgrößer : 13803 04/2017 EN - S A ILN ILNAS-EN 13803:2017 p o h S - e S A https://portail-qualite.public.lu/fr/normes-normalisation/participer-normalisation.html - - - CENELEC) andInternational(ISO,IEC)standards: participate forFREEinthedevelopmentofLuxembourgish(ILNAS),European(CEN, Every interestedparty,whichismemberofanorganizationbasedinLuxembourg,can ILNAS-EN 13803:2017. This EuropeanStandardEN13803:2017wasadoptedasLuxembourgish National Foreword ILN a i v Participate intechnicalcommitteemeetings Foresee futuredevelopments Participate inthedesignofstandards y p or anyotherdatacarrieswithoutpriorpermission! any formorbymean-electronic,mechanical, photocopying Nothing fromthispublicationmaybereproduced orutilizedin THIS PUBLICATIONISCOPYRIGHTPROTECTED o C y l n o w ie v e r P - 2017 : 13803 EN - S A ILN EUROPEAN STANDARD ILNAS-EN 13803:2017 EN 13803 NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM April 2017 ICS 93.100 Supersedes EN 13803-1:2010, EN 13803- 2:2006+A1:2009 English Version Railway applications - Track - Track alignment design parameters - Track gauges 1 435 mm and wider Applications ferroviaires - Voie - Paramètres de Bahnanwendungen - Oberbau - Trassierungsparameter conception du tracé de la voie - Écartement 1 435 mm - Spurweiten 1 435 mm und größer et plus large p o h S - e This European Standard was approved by CEN on 21 December 2016. S A CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this ILN European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.
  • Vikingtrain.Com

    Vikingtrain.Com

    VIKING TRAIN - CASE STUDY - Disclaimer This document is authorized for use only in eknowit-learning.eu courses, co-funded by the Marco Polo Programme of the European Union. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the permission of eKnowIT consortium. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials write to [email protected] or go to eknowit.eu. VIKING TRAIN 1. INTRODUCTION In the late 90s, Lithuanian government started to develop a strategy with the aim to become a leading logistics centre in Europe. Lithuania is commonly known as a transit country because in its particular location it shares borders with other European Union (EU) members (Poland and Latvia), with a Commonwealth Independent States (CIS) country (Belarus) and even with the Russian Federation (Kaliningrad Oblast). Lithuanian’s territory is traversed by multiple international transport corridors including access to the Baltic Sea through Klaipeda seaport and connections among Western Europe, Scandinavia, Russia and other CIS countries. In this situation, Lithuanian governments have pursued long-term economic growth through a Transport System Development Strategy. This plan states that the country is heavily committed to comply with EU transport policy that aims to facilitate a modal shift of at least 30% of road freight over 300 km to other transport modes by 2030. In order to achieve such ambitious goal it was indicated that advantages of individual models of transport and efficient interoperability would be exploited to the maximum potential. In this sense, the long-term strategy on transport was clearly oriented to a dominant use of railway mode for freight transportation.
  • Euro-Asian Transport Linkages Development

    Euro-Asian Transport Linkages Development

    Informal document No. 1 Distr.: General 20 January 2017 English only Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics Group of Experts on Euro-Asian Transport Links Fifteenth session Yerevan, 31 January and 1 February 2017 Item 2 of the provisional agenda Identification of cargo flows on the Euro-Asian transport links Draft report of the phase III of the Euro-Asian Transport Links project Prepared by the "Scientific and Research Institute of Motor Transport" (NIIAT) Introduction 1. This document contains the draft final report of the phase III of the Euro-Asian Transport Links (EATL) project. It presents the results of the project’s phase III whose aim was to identify measures to make the overland EATL operational. 2. In particular, the report offers an overview and analysis of the existing situation in transport and trade along EATL routes, it reviews existing studies, programmes and initiatives on the development of EATL in the period 2013-2016, it identifies main transportation and trade obstacles in transport, trade, border-crossing, customs and transit along the EATL routes, and it formulates recommendations to overcome the identified obstacles as well as to further develop the trade across the EATL area. 3. This document is submitted to the fifteenth session of the Group of Experts on EATL for discussion and review. Informal document No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EURO-ASIAN TRADE ROUTES AND FREIGHT FLOWS I.1. Economics and trade current situation in EATL Region I.1.1. General overview: world trade and economics I.1.2.
  • Problemy Kolejnictwa 183 ANG.Indd

    Problemy Kolejnictwa 183 ANG.Indd

    PROBLEMY KOLEJNICTWA RAILWAY REPORTS Issue 183 (June 2019) ISSN 0552-2145 (print) ISSN 2544-9451 (on-line) 107 Technological Barriers to Interoperability in Railway Transport Between Europe and China Szymon FINKE1 , Mateusz MOTYL2 Summary Th e growth in freight-traffi c between Europe and China is driving the quest for new transport routes between these re- gions. One of the options is to use railway routes. Th e concept of using railway connections is referred to as the New Silk Route. A number of analyses of freight traffi c point to a huge demand for this type of transport since sea freight is marked by seasonality, long travel times and the growing problem of congested ports, both in China and Europe. Currently, there are several railway connections between China and Europe. Th ese connections are hindered by intermodal transport and transhipment, which extend freight travel time, generate extra costs and result in the low capacity of these con- nections. In order to increase capacity, new connections should be developed using the interoperability of all the railway routes between Europe and China. Many barriers, however, impede this idea. Many of those barriers are technological in nature. Th is paper looks into technological barriers that constrain interoperability in railway transport between Europe and Chi- na. Th e fi rst section sheds some light on the idea of interoperability, as well as railway connections between Europe and China. Th e second section points to the technological barriers in this kind of transport. Th e next section presents some possible solutions for removing the barriers.
  • Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe

    Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe

    Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe Version 3 December 2017 This publication was prepared by Oleh Shchuryk, Research & Projects Manager, ECG – the Association of European Vehicle Logistics. Foreword The project to produce this book on ‘Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe’ was initiated during the ECG Land Transport Working Group meeting in January 2014, Frankfurt am Main. Initially, it was suggested by the members of the group that Oleh Shchuryk prepares a short briefing paper about the current status quo of rail transport and FVLs by rail in Europe. It was to be a concise document explaining the complex nature of rail, its difficulties and challenges, main players, and their roles and responsibilities to be used by ECG’s members. However, it rapidly grew way beyond these simple objectives as you will see. The first draft of the project was presented at the following Land Transport WG meeting which took place in May 2014, Frankfurt am Main. It received further support from the group and in order to gain more knowledge on specific rail technical issues it was decided that ECG should organise site visits with rail technical experts of ECG member companies at their railway operations sites. These were held with DB Schenker Rail Automotive in Frankfurt am Main, BLG Automotive in Bremerhaven, ARS Altmann in Wolnzach, and STVA in Valenton and Paris. As a result of these collaborations, and continuous research on various rail issues, the document was extensively enlarged. The document consists of several parts, namely a historical section that covers railway development in Europe and specific EU countries; a technical section that discusses the different technical issues of the railway (gauges, electrification, controlling and signalling systems, etc.); a section on the liberalisation process in Europe; a section on the key rail players, and a section on logistics services provided by rail.
  • Railways As World Heritage Sites

    Railways As World Heritage Sites

    Occasional Papers for the World Heritage Convention RAILWAYS AS WORLD HERITAGE SITES Anthony Coulls with contributions by Colin Divall and Robert Lee International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) 1999 Notes • Anthony Coulls was employed at the Institute of Railway Studies, National Railway Museum, York YO26 4XJ, UK, to prepare this study. • ICOMOS is deeply grateful to the Government of Austria for the generous grant that made this study possible. Published by: ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites) 49-51 Rue de la Fédération F-75015 Paris France Telephone + 33 1 45 67 67 70 Fax + 33 1 45 66 06 22 e-mail [email protected] © ICOMOS 1999 Contents Railways – an historical introduction 1 Railways as World Heritage sites – some theoretical and practical considerations 5 The proposed criteria for internationally significant railways 8 The criteria in practice – some railways of note 12 Case 1: The Moscow Underground 12 Case 2: The Semmering Pass, Austria 13 Case 3: The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, United States of America 14 Case 4: The Great Zig Zag, Australia 15 Case 5: The Darjeeling Himalayan Railway, India 17 Case 6: The Liverpool & Manchester Railway, United Kingdom 19 Case 7: The Great Western Railway, United Kingdom 22 Case 8: The Shinkansen, Japan 23 Conclusion 24 Acknowledgements 25 Select bibliography 26 Appendix – Members of the Advisory Committee and Correspondents 29 Railways – an historical introduction he possibility of designating industrial places as World Heritage Sites has always been Timplicit in the World Heritage Convention but it is only recently that systematic attention has been given to the task of identifying worthy locations.
  • 4A Railway Gauges in Ontario

    4A Railway Gauges in Ontario

    4a Railway Gauges in Ontario History of the Railway Gauge Much has been written, but in summary, the best speculation is that what became the “standard” or “Ste- phenson” gauge of 4 ft 8½ inches (1,435 mm) was adopted from early Northumberland UK horse tram- ways that transported “coals to Newcastle”. George Stephenson (1781-1848), a self-taught civil and me- chanical engineer who did his apprenticeship around the Northumberland collieries, is widely acknowl- edged as being “the father” of the railways, although he may be more accurately described as the enabler who made steam locomotion a practical reality. No one knows how the Northumberland tramways came to adopt the 4 ft 8½ inch gauge, although it may be a practical result of a wagon width determined more or less by the breadth of a wagon harness hitched to a well-built pit pony. As George Stephenson, partnering with his son Robert (1803-1859), went into the locomotive manufacturing business as Robert Stephenson & Co., this gauge was adopted for production. As there was an immediate robust export business to all parts of the world (often accompanied by British engineering expertise), the “off the assembly line” product was shipped to that gauge, with its consequent general adoption by the purchaser. This not did however result in the immediate global adoption of the “Standard” gauge – far from it, even today only just over 50 per cent of world railway mileage is on the standard gauge (Wikipedia). The rest is more or less divided into a 5 ft something or a 3 ft something gauge group.
  • Locomotive Market of Russia and 1520 Space Countries

    Locomotive Market of Russia and 1520 Space Countries

    In 2007 the analytical materials of INFOLine information agency were worthily appraised by the leading European companies. In 2007 the analytical materials of INFOLine information agency were worthily appraised by the leading European companies. According to the regulations of the association, all materials of INFOLine agency are certified according to Eurostandards; this insures the quality of materials received by our customers and availability of aftersale services through additional consulting on customers’ request. Branch Research Locomotive Market of Russia and 1520 Space Countries Results of 2011 and Prognosis till 2015 . Main performance figures of railway engineering development in Russia during 2002-2011 . Business description of traction stock manufacturing companies in Russia and 1520 space countries . Dynamics of diesel-electric and electric locomotives production in Russia and other countries of 1520 space . Description of conditions of locomotives fleets of 1520 space railway administrations as well as transport companies of Russia . Dynamics and prognosis of market volume for traction stock in Russia and other countries of 1520 space . Technical specifications of the main traction stock models Locomotive Market of Russia and 1520 Space Countries Results of 2011 and Prognosis till 2015 Contents About Locomotive Market of Russia and 1520 Space Countries research........................................................................4 Section I. Description of the traction stock and railway engineering market ...................................................................9
  • These Minutes Are Drawn up and Signed in the English, Chinese and Russian Languages in Warsaw on 23 November 2018

    These Minutes Are Drawn up and Signed in the English, Chinese and Russian Languages in Warsaw on 23 November 2018

    These Minutes are drawn up and signed in the English, Chinese and Russian languages in Warsaw on 23 November 2018. The Chairman of the Conference _________________________ Aristov Sergey Representatives of the OSJD Member States from: Republic of Azerbaijan __________________________ Guliyev Nijat Islamic Republic of Afghanistan __________________________ Bakhshi Abdulrazaq Republic of Belarus __________________________ Shylau Ihar Republic of Bulgaria __________________________ Vasilev Veselin Hungary __________________________ Simon Roland Socialist Republic of Viet Nam __________________________ Vu Quang Khoi Georgia __________________________ Paatashvili Mikheil Republic of Kazakhstan __________________________ Assavbayev Asset People’s Republic of China __________________________ Liu Keqiang Democratic People’s Republic of Korea __________________________ Jang In Chol Republic of Korea __________________________ Lee Yoonsang Republic of Latvia __________________________ Merirands Dins Republic of Lithuania __________________________ Šniuolis Andrius Republic of Moldova _________________________ Constantinov Valerii Mongolia ________________________ Ariunbold Batbold Republic of Poland ________________________ ______________________ Bittel Andrzej Russian Federation ________________________ Aristov Sergey Romania _______________________ Fort Calin Cristian Slovak Republic _______________________ Juhás Milan Uzbekistan ______________________ Kayumkhodjaev Shukhrat Ukraine ______________________ Fedorenko Olexandr Czech Republic ______________________
  • Arrangement of Statistical Monitoring of Production Processes at Russian Railroads Statistical Reporting and Primary Documentation in JSC RZD

    Arrangement of Statistical Monitoring of Production Processes at Russian Railroads Statistical Reporting and Primary Documentation in JSC RZD

    Analysis and Statistics Department JSC “Russian Railways” Arrangement of statistical monitoring of production processes at Russian railroads Statistical reporting and primary documentation in JSC RZD Currently JSC RZD is using: Internal statistical reporting forms - 255 pcs; Primary documentation account forms -1,079 pcs; For automated generation of 145 internal statistical reporting forms, we use 112 automated primary account forms with application of electronic digital signatures, including: 33 in locomotive complex; 19 in carriage facilities; 11 in track facilities; 35 in electrification facilities; 12 in freight complex; 2 in automation and telemechanics, communication and computing facilities; 2 S.A. Filipchenko Main activities of the Analysis and Statistics Department of JSC RZD are focused on: • Statistical analysis of production processes 1 • Statistical modeling and optimization of transport management processes 2 • Development and implementation of Analytical Decision-Making Support 3 System 3 S.A. Filipchenko Basic principles of modern railroad statistics: 1. Common methodological base with automated hierarchy of performance indicators; 2. Common information environment of statistical data; 3. Common system for keeping rail transport performance indicators with development of the indicators comparability algorithms; 4. Common platform for visual analytics of statistical data and decision- making support system. 4 S.A. Filipchenko Common methodological base with automated hierarchy of performance indicators 5 S.A. Filipchenko Structure of automated methodological bases Chart 1 – Structures of automated methodological bases Structure "Form" Structure "Indicator" Statistical reporting form Indicator 1 Practice of generation Formula Relation Analytical forms Practice of generation Indicator 2 Indicator Statistical reporting form Formula Relation InformationInformation warehouses warehouses 6 S.A. Filipchenko Source system of methodological base maintenance 7 S.A.