The March of the Buzzards Crook’S Flank March at Fisher’S Hill

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The March of the Buzzards Crook’S Flank March at Fisher’S Hill THE MARCH OF THE BUZZARDS CROOK’S FLANK MARCH AT FISHER’S HILL 23rd Ohio Infantry. Part of Col. Rutherford B. Hayes’s brigade in the the Army of West Virginia. Courtesy of Rutherford B. Hayes Presidential Center “THEY ALWAYS STOOD SIDEWAYS” THE ROAD TO THE VALLEY’S “GIBRALTAR" Just days before the Battle of Fisher’s Hill, Union cavalry scouts visited After being decisively defeated by Union Gen. Philip Sheridan at Third the Barr Farm (on the target property) on Little North Mountain, at Winchester on September 19, 1864, Confederate Gen. Jubal Early the western end of what would become the battlefield, just as the fam- withdrew his force some 20 miles ily was sitting down to dinner. Although the family hurriedly hid in south to Fisher’s Hill, the their cellar, leaving their food on the table – food the soldiers quickly “Gibraltar of the Valley.” Fisher’s wolfed down – they eventually felt safe enough to climb back up. The Hill was an imposing, fortified soldiers had disturbing news: a battle would soon be fought here. ridgeline that sat at the narrowest part of the Valley, stretching just Little did the family suspect that the battle’s pivotal flank march and and attack would come right across their farm. four miles from Massanutten Early and Sheridan Mountain on the east to Little North The cavalrymen were likely from Gen. William Mountain (including the target property) on the west. But Early had Averell’s command, scouting ahead of the several challenges . First, after his heavy losses at Third Winchester, he no Union advance. Averell himself scouted the longer had enough men to adequately man the position. Second, the area on September 21, 1864, and later reported height of Fisher’s Hill lessens as you move westward – making the left of that “A line of rail and earth breastworks was Early’s line more vulnerable. reached, behind which the enemy had a strong The third challenge was of Early’s own making. Believing the greatest line of infantry or dismounted men. I threat was on his right, he put his strongest forces there and in the Gen. William Averell informed [Gen. Philip Sheridan]... that an middle – his strongest defensive positions . For reasons never explained, infantry corps, by hugging the base of the North Mountain, might he put his weakest and most unreliable unit, break around the enemy's left and render his position untenable.” dismounted cavalry under Gen. Lunsford Such an advance would cross rugged, uneven ground. The best Lomax, on his vulnerable left flank – his troops to make such a march would be ones who were used to weakest position. journeying through mountainous terrain – so used to it that they Lomax placed the 8th Virginia on his left – the “always stood sidewise, with one foot higher than the other.” Troops extreme left of the Confederate line – on the that were “mostly mountaineers... grown accustomed to service in the slopes of Little North Mountain, (on the mountains, [making] the move through the woods and brush along target property), little suspecting they would the mountain side... entirely practicable.” be right in the path of the Federal advance... Troops like the Army of West Virginia – the “Buzzards.” The Buzzards were coming. Gen. Lunsford Lomax Union Gen. George Crook’s ARMY OF WEST VIRGINIA was largely “LIFTING ITSELF UP MENACINGLY” made up of regiments from West Virginia and Ohio. It was On September 20, the day after Third Winchester, Sheridan’s army nicknamed the “Buzzards” and “The Mountain Creepers,” a tribute to marched south in pursuit of Early. As they approached Strasburg, they its hard marching in the mountainous terrain of the Appalachians and spied the daunting ridgeline of Fisher’s Hill. “We could see the hill the Valley. At Third Winchester, its flank attack had set the stage for lifting itself up menacingly to our advance,” recalled Union Capt. James the Union victory. Within Sheridan’s army, it operated similar to a F. Fitts of the 114th New York. “[The Confederates] now occupied one corps – and was sometimes referred to as the 8th Corps. of the best defensive positions in Virginia.” “THE SECRET M ARCH” “SO THAT NO NOISE WOULD BE MADE” After conferring with his commanders, At 2 p.m., Sheridan ordered Crook to move his troops, "to the eastern Sheridan ruled out a direct frontal assault slope of [Little] North Mountain, and to pass around the enemy's and agreed to Gen. George Crook’s extreme left and get on his flank and rear and drive him from his suggestion to send Crook’s Army of works." Col. Wildes remembered that, “We threw off and piled up our West Virginia on a long march around knapsacks, arranged canteens and bayonet scabbards so that no noise the Confederate left flank, along the would be made by them, and in the lightest kind of marching order, base of Little North Mountain. “I started up the steep, thickly wooded side of Little North Mountain. resolved [to] move Crook, unperceived Ascending for a half mile or more, we turned abruptly to the left [on if possible,” he later reported, “Onto the target property], and silently moved south, along the face of the the face of Little North Mountain and mountain, each division in two lines, side by side. About 3 p.m., we got let him strike the left and rear of the squarely on the enemy's flank, with our left past his entrenchments.” enemy's line... To do this required much secrecy, as the enemy had a “IT WAS TOO LATE” signal station on [Massanutten An alarmed Confederate Gen. Bryan Grimes spotted the movement. Mountain], from which he could “About 3 o’clock we perceived two columns moving up the side of the see every movement made by our mountain to our left,” he later wrote. troops; therefore, during the night He reported this to Gen. Stephen of the 20th I concealed Crook Ramseur, his superior, urging him to in the timber north of Cedar shift men to support Lomax’s Creek, where he remained Union Gen. George Crook cavalry, but Ramseur declined until during the 21st.” he communicated with Early. “Alas!” Grimes said. “It was too late.” Jesse Tyler Sturm of the 14th West Virginia was one of the soldiers marching with Crook. “On the morning of the 20th we started up the As they advanced, Crook’s men valley on ‘The secret march’...” he later wrote. encountered the skirmishers from the “We were placed in camp in a heavy timber 8th Virginia Cavalry that Gen. Lomax near Middletown and were not allowed to had positioned on his left flank (on make light by night nor smoke by day, the target property). Confederate Gen. Bryan Grimes Sheridan intending to conceal Crook as to James D. Sedinger, a member of the deceive the enemy as to his whereabouts. Border Rangers (Company E) in the 8th Virginia Cavalry, recalled, There was many a little fire built and a “...General Crooks [sic] with the 8th Corps and the entire federal blanket held over it to hide the light cavalry struck the left flank...Our regiment being up in the woods on while the boys made their cup of coffee.” the North Mountain dismounted, fighting as infantry. Colonel Cook ordered us to charge which we did, and struck the rear of Crooks corps During the day on September 21, the who about-faced and poured a hot fire into us killing John Beckwith Federals drove the Confederates off Flint and capturing Sedinger [referring to himself] of the old company.” Hill, just north of Fisher’s Hill, giving Jesse Tyler Sturm them a complete view of the Confederate Alerted, Lomax’s men hurried to meet the threat, but their efforts were line – and helping to hide Crook’s movement from the southerners. too little and too late. Although some of the cavalrymen had been That night, Crook moved again, marching his men 5 miles and digging breastworks, at the time of the attack they were only 18 inches concealing them in “a clump of timber” behind Hupp’s Hill. high. Lomax’s gunners “worked like beavers” to turn their cannon and fire, but with little effect. “The enemy opened on us with shot and “UNDER COVER OF WOODS AND RAVINES” shell,” Col. Wildes remembered. “Too late! The first shot was the About 5:30 am on September 22, Sheridan ordered Crook to march to signal to charge, and before they could make any, even the slightest, a wooded position between the right-rear of the 6th Corps and Little preparations to meet us, we were upon them with the bayonet.” North Mountain. “Crook moved out to the extreme right, out of sight, under cover of woods and ravines,” Crook attacked about 4 pm, the Buzzards hitting the southern line remembered Col. Thomas Wildes “like a thunderbolt.” As Averell and Ricketts joined in, Lomax’s of the 116th Ohio. Crook reached his overmatched defenders were overwhelmed and collapsed. The position, about a mile behind Gen. James Confederate flank crumbled, and – with the entire Union army join- Ricketts’ infantry division, by mid- ing the attack – the seceding positions fell like dominoes, giving way as morning. Meanwhile, to distract the they were hit from multiple directions. Gen. Grimes, on the next hill southerners, the rest of the Federals over, recalled how “[The attack] came like an avalanche. The cavalry demonstrated and probed the center and breaking, my skirmish line presented but a feeble resistance. The right of Early’s line. Although enemy attacked me on my left flank, front and rear at the same time.” Confederate lookouts reported Federal Early’s entire line disintegrated, his troops retreating southwards in movement to the west, it’s likely that they disarray.
Recommended publications
  • United Confederate Veterans Association Records
    UNITED CONFEDERATE VETERANS ASSOCIATION RECORDS (Mss. 1357) Inventory Compiled by Luana Henderson 1996 Louisiana and Lower Mississippi Valley Collections Special Collections, Hill Memorial Library Louisiana State University Libraries Baton Rouge, Louisiana Revised 2009 UNITED CONFEDERATE VETERANS ASSOCIATION RECORDS Mss. 1357 1861-1944 Special Collections, LSU Libraries CONTENTS OF INVENTORY SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 BIOGRAPHICAL/HISTORICAL NOTE ...................................................................................... 4 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE ................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF SUBGROUPS AND SERIES ......................................................................................... 7 SUBGROUPS AND SERIES DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................ 8 INDEX TERMS ............................................................................................................................ 13 CONTAINER LIST ...................................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................... 22 APPENDIX B .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher’S Guide Teacher’S Guide Little Bighorn National Monument
    LITTLE BIGHORN NATIONAL MONUMENT TEACHER’S GUIDE TEACHER’S GUIDE LITTLE BIGHORN NATIONAL MONUMENT INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Teacher’s Guide is to provide teachers grades K-12 information and activities concerning Plains Indian Life-ways, the events surrounding the Battle of the Little Bighorn, the Personalities involved and the Impact of the Battle. The information provided can be modified to fit most ages. Unit One: PERSONALITIES Unit Two: PLAINS INDIAN LIFE-WAYS Unit Three: CLASH OF CULTURES Unit Four: THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876 Unit Five: BATTLE OF THE LITTLE BIGHORN Unit Six: IMPACT OF THE BATTLE In 1879 the land where The Battle of the Little Bighorn occurred was designated Custer Battlefield National Cemetery in order to protect the bodies of the men buried on the field of battle. With this designation, the land fell under the control of the United States War Department. It would remain under their control until 1940, when the land was turned over to the National Park Service. Custer Battlefield National Monument was established by Congress in 1946. The name was changed to Little Bighorn National Monument in 1991. This area was once the homeland of the Crow Indians who by the 1870s had been displaced by the Lakota and Cheyenne. The park consists of 765 acres on the east boundary of the Little Bighorn River: the larger north- ern section is known as Custer Battlefield, the smaller Reno-Benteen Battlefield is located on the bluffs over-looking the river five miles to the south. The park lies within the Crow Indian Reservation in southeastern Montana, one mile east of I-90.
    [Show full text]
  • Music and the American Civil War
    “LIBERTY’S GREAT AUXILIARY”: MUSIC AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR by CHRISTIAN MCWHIRTER A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2009 Copyright Christian McWhirter 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Music was almost omnipresent during the American Civil War. Soldiers, civilians, and slaves listened to and performed popular songs almost constantly. The heightened political and emotional climate of the war created a need for Americans to express themselves in a variety of ways, and music was one of the best. It did not require a high level of literacy and it could be performed in groups to ensure that the ideas embedded in each song immediately reached a large audience. Previous studies of Civil War music have focused on the music itself. Historians and musicologists have examined the types of songs published during the war and considered how they reflected the popular mood of northerners and southerners. This study utilizes the letters, diaries, memoirs, and newspapers of the 1860s to delve deeper and determine what roles music played in Civil War America. This study begins by examining the explosion of professional and amateur music that accompanied the onset of the Civil War. Of the songs produced by this explosion, the most popular and resonant were those that addressed the political causes of the war and were adopted as the rallying cries of northerners and southerners. All classes of Americans used songs in a variety of ways, and this study specifically examines the role of music on the home-front, in the armies, and among African Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay: Custer, Crazy Horse, Sitting Bull, and the Little Bighorn
    REVIEW ESSAY Bloodshed at Little Bighorn: Sitting Bull, Custer, and the Destinies of Nations. By Tim Lehman. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. 219 pp. Maps, illustrations, notes, bibliogra- phy, index. $19.95 paper. The Last Stand: Custer, Sitting Bull, and the Battle of the Little Bighorn. By Nathaniel Philbrick. New York: Viking, 2010. xxii + 466 pp. Maps, photographs, appendices, notes, bibliography, index. $30.00 cloth, $18.00 paper. Custer: Lessons in Leadership. By Duane Schultz. Foreword by General Wesley K. Clark. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. x + 206 pp. Photographs, notes, bibliography, index. $14.00 paper. The Killing of Crazy Horse. By Thomas Powers. New York: Knopf, 2010. xx + 568 pp. Maps, illustra- tions, photographs, notes, bibliography, index. $30.00 cloth, $17.00 paper. CUSTER, CRAZY HORSE, SITTING BULL, AND THE LITTLE BIGHORN In the summer of 1876, the United States some Cheyennes, and a handful of Arapahos. government launched the Great Sioux War, The resulting Battle of the Little Bighorn left a sharp instrument intended to force the last Custer and 267 soldiers, Crow scouts, and civil- nonagency Lakotas onto reservations. In doing ians dead, scattered in small groups and lonely so, it precipitated a series of events that proved singletons across the countryside—all but disastrous for its forces in the short run and fifty-eight of them in his immediate command, calamitous for the Lakotas in the much longer which was annihilated. With half the regiment scheme of things. killed or wounded, the Battle of the Little On June 17, Lakotas and Cheyennes crippled Bighorn ranked as the worst defeat inflicted General George Crook’s 1,300-man force at the on the army during the Plains Indian Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Appomattox Court House Is on the Crest of a 770-Foot High Ridge
    NFS Form 1MOO OWB No. 1024-O01S United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I 9 /98g National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name APPnMATTnY rnriPT unn^F other names/site number APPOM ATTnY ^HITBT HHTTC;P MATTDMAT HISTOPICAT. PARK 2. Location , : _ | not for publication street & nurnberAPPOMATTOX COUPT" HOUSE NATIONAL HISTO RICAL PAR city, town APPOMATTOX v| vicinity code " ~ "* state TrrnrrxTTA code CH county APPnMATTnY Q I T_ zip code 2^579 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property a private n building(s) Contributing Noncontributing public-local B district 31 3 buildings 1 1 public-State site Q sites f_xl public-Federal 1 1 structure lit 1 fl structures CH object 1 objects Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously None_________ listed in the National Register 0_____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification Asjhe designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this Sd nomination I I request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Staff Officers of the Confederate States Army. 1861-1865
    QJurttell itttiuetsity Hibrary Stliaca, xV'cni tUu-k THE JAMES VERNER SCAIFE COLLECTION CIVIL WAR LITERATURE THE GIFT OF JAMES VERNER SCAIFE CLASS OF 1889 1919 Cornell University Library E545 .U58 List of staff officers of the Confederat 3 1924 030 921 096 olin The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030921096 LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES ARMY 1861-1865. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1891. LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE ARMY. Abercrombie, R. S., lieut., A. D. C. to Gen. J. H. Olanton, November 16, 1863. Abercrombie, Wiley, lieut., A. D. C. to Brig. Gen. S. G. French, August 11, 1864. Abernathy, John T., special volunteer commissary in department com- manded by Brig. Gen. G. J. Pillow, November 22, 1861. Abrams, W. D., capt., I. F. T. to Lieut. Gen. Lee, June 11, 1864. Adair, Walter T., surg. 2d Cherokee Begt., staff of Col. Wm. P. Adair. Adams, , lieut., to Gen. Gauo, 1862. Adams, B. C, capt., A. G. S., April 27, 1862; maj., 0. S., staff General Bodes, July, 1863 ; ordered to report to Lieut. Col. R. G. Cole, June 15, 1864. Adams, C, lieut., O. O. to Gen. R. V. Richardson, March, 1864. Adams, Carter, maj., C. S., staff Gen. Bryan Grimes, 1865. Adams, Charles W., col., A. I. G. to Maj. Gen. T. C. Hiudman, Octo- ber 6, 1862, to March 4, 1863. Adams, James M., capt., A.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORY RESOURCES
    Guide to NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORY RESOURCES Crow man and woman inside tipi, 1902-1910 Richard Throssel Papers #02394. Compiled By: Kim Mainardis 1998 Revised By: James Deagon and Leslie Waggener 2008 INTRODUCTION The American Heritage Center (AHC) is ON-LINE ACCESS the University of Wyoming’s archives, Bibliographic access to materials can be rare books and manuscripts repository. reached through University of Wyoming’s AHC collections go beyond Wyoming or library catalog, OCLC (Online Computer the region’s borders to include the Library Center), or the Rocky Mountain American West, the mining and petroleum Online Archive (www.rmoa.org). industries, U.S. politics and world affairs, environment and natural resources, HOURS OF SERVICE journalism, transportation, the history of Monday 10:00am- 9:00pm books, and 20th century entertainment. Tuesday- Friday 8:00am-5:00 pm The American Heritage Center traces its FOR MORE INFORMATION beginnings to the efforts of Dr. Grace PLEASE CALL OR WRITE Raymond Hebard, an engineer, lawyer, American Heritage Center suffragist, historian, and University of University of Wyoming Wyoming professor, librarian, and trustee. Dept. 3924 From approximately 1895 to 1935, 1000 E. University Ave. Hebard collected source materials relating Laramie, WY 82071 to the history of Wyoming, the West, (307)766-4114 (Main number) emigrant trails, and Native Americans. (307)766-3756 (Reference Department) (307)766-5511 (FAX) In 1945, University Librarian Lola Homsher established the Western History Collection at the University of Wyoming, with the materials gathered by Hebard as its nucleus. An active collecting program ensued, and in 1976, the name was changed to the American Heritage Center to reflect the archives’ broad holdings relating to American history.
    [Show full text]
  • Qfwar'slastdays ."St Fighting
    Only Newspaper in North Carolina That Has Over 10,000 Subscribers. 16 Pages—Section One—Pages i to 8, The News and Observer. Volume LVII. No. 28. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, TUESDAY MORNING, APRIL 11. 1905. Price Five Cents. sqDD fcipftflD ©sqtoDßod® Papstps Bod GB®{tOD Kl®w© sqodgO (EB[p©QoOs]tiO®QD spring opened it became daily more my skirmishers and it(iffabf apparent that human power and en- battle. I reconnoiter durance could do no more, and that AN myself as to their position?»- <• jq APPOMATTOX VETERAN J a forced evacuation of the beleaguered ed the arrivel of General Gorao,. FUTILE MEET city was near at hand. In anticipation instructions, who, a wiiile before day, ."ST FIGHTING of ~that event General Lee caused the accompanied by General Fitz Lee, removal of all his surplus material to TELLS OF CLOSING SCENES came to my position, when we held a Amelia Court House.” “While his ad- council of war. General Gordon was versary was thus active, Lee was not of the opinion that the troops in our QF WAR'S LAST DAYS idle. He had formed a plan to sur- front were cavalry, and that General BY 'TAR HEELS prise the enemy’s centre by a night Major H. A. London Reviews the Claims of North Fitz Lee should attack. Fitz Lee attack, which, if succes.sful, would thought they were infantry and that would have given him possession of Carolina, and Cites the Evidence, Speaking General Gordon should attack. They Capt. S. A. a commanding position in the enemy’s discussed the matter so long that I Captain Jenkins Tells of Ashe Recounts rear, and control of the military rail- became impatient, and said it was road to City Point, a very important as Eye-Witness of Last Act of Drama.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Army Scouts: the Southwestern
    3-/71 UNITED STATES ARMY SCOUTS: THE SOUTHWESTERN EXPERIENCE, 1866-1890 THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Carol Conley Nance, B. A. Denton, Texas May, 1975 Nance, Carol Conley, United States Army Scouts: The Southwestern Experience, 1866-1890. Master of Arts (History), May, 1975, 156 pp., 4 maps, bibliography, 107 titles. In the post-Civil War Southwest, the United States Army utilized civilians and Indians as scouts. As the mainstay of the reconnaissance force, enlisted Indians excelled as trackers, guides, and fighters. General George Crook became the foremost advocate of this service. A little-known aspect of the era was the international controversy created by the activities of native trackers under the 1882 recipro- cal hot pursuit agreement between Mexico and the United States. Providing valuable information on Army scouts are numerous government records which include the Annual Report of the Secretary of War from 1866 to 1896 and Foreign Relations of the United States for 1883 and 1886. Memoirs, biographies, and articles in regional and national histori- cal journals supplement government documents. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF MAPS . iv Chapter I. THE SOUTHWEST: CONVENTIONAL ARMY, UNCONVENTIONAL ENEMY 17 II. ARMY SCOUTS: CIVILIANS ON THE TRAIL . 2.17 III. ARMY SCOUTS: SET AN INDIAN TO CATCH AN INDIAN ..................... - - - - 28 IV. GENERAL GEORGE CROOK: UNCONVENTIONAL SOLDIER ........................ - -0 -0 -0 .0 68 V. INDIAN SCOUTS: AN INTERNATIONAL CONTROVERSY .......... *........ .100 VI. ARMY SCOUTS: SOME OBSERVATIONS .. o. 142 BIBLIOGRAPHY, . ...........-.-.-. .148 iii LIST OF MAPS Map Following Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Off Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1. Name___2. Location___3. Classifica
    NFS Form 10-900 (7-81) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register off Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections______________ 1. Name_________________ historic SAYLER'S CREEK BATTLEFIELD_________________ and/or common____________________________________ 2. Location______________ street & number State Routes 617,618 and 619 not for publication city, town FARMVILLE AND BURKEVILLE _X_ vicinity of congressional district 007 state VIRGINIA code 51 county AMELIA & PRINCE EDWARD code 147 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use __ district __ public _X_ occupied _X. agriculture museum __ building(s) __ private __ unoccupied __ commercial x park __ structure _1L both __ work in progress __ educational X private residence _X_site Public Acquisition Accessible __ entertainment __ religious __ object __ in process X yes: restricted government __ scientific __ being considered yes: unrestricted industrial __ transportation no military __ other: 4. Owner off Property name SEE CONTINUATION SHEET street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. SEE CONTINUATION SHEET street & number city, town state 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title VIRGINIA HI STORIC LANDMARKS COMMI SS I ONias this property been determined eligible? yes no date CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF BEING SUBMITTED federal X state county local depository for survey records 221 Governor Street city, town Richmond state Virginia 23219 7. Description Condition Check one Check one X excellent deteriorated X unaltered X original s ite good .. ruins altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance I.
    [Show full text]
  • CUSTER BATTLEFIELD National Monument Montana (Now Little Bighorn Battlefield)
    CUSTER BATTLEFIELD National Monument Montana (now Little Bighorn Battlefield) by Robert M. Utley National Park Service Historical Handbook Series No. 1 Washington, D.C. 1969 Contents a. A CUSTER PROFILE b. CUSTER'S LAST STAND 1. Campaign of 1876 2. Indian Movements 3. Plan of Action 4. March to the Little Bighorn 5. Reno Attacks 6. The Annihilation of Custer 7. Reno Besieged 8. Rescue 9. Collapse of the Sioux 10. Custer Battlefield Today 11. Campaign Maps c. APPENDIXES I. Officers of the 7th Cavalry at the Battle of the Little Bighorn II. Low Dog's Account of the Battle III. Gall's Account of the Battle IV. A Participant's Account of Major Reno's Battle d. CUSTER'S LAST CAMPAIGN: A PHOTOGRAPHIC ESSAY e. THE ART AND THE ARTIST f. ADMINISTRATION For additional information, visit the Web site for Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument or view their Official National Park Handbook (#132): Historical Handbook Number One 1969 The publication of this handbook was made possible by a grant from the Custer Battlefield Historical and Museum Association, Inc. This publication is one of a series of handbooks describing the historical and archeological areas in the National Park System administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Price lists of Park Service publications sold by the Government Printing Office may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. 20402. The National Park System, of which Custer Battlefield National Monument is a unit, is dedicated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and historic heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people.
    [Show full text]
  • John Cook Was a Diminutive 4 Feet 9 Inches Tall Upon His Enlistment at the Age of 14 on June 7, 1861
    Photo courtesy of G. Dodge John Cook was a diminutive 4 feet 9 inches tall upon his enlistment at the age of 14 on June 7, 1861. He was born on August 10, 1846 in Cincinnati, Ohio. Before the war he was a laborer. At the Battle of Antietam, the young bugler was awarded the Medal of Honor for serving the guns. See story on page 25 . 6 ARLINGTON HISTORICAL MAGAZINE The Civil War Medal of Honor Recipients of Arlington National Cemetery BY GEORGE w. DODGE Medal of Honor recipients did not initially hold Arlington National Cemetery in high regard since it originated as a potter's field during the Civil War on May 13, 1864. Over 5,000 soldiers were interred within a year. 1 After the war, the remains of several thousand soldiers within a cir­ cuit of fifty miles from Washington were disinterred and reinterred in Ar­ lington. Many were unknown. It would take the burials of distinguished high-ranking officers to begin to alter the perception of Arlington Burial Grounds as a potter's field. When General Philip H. Sheridan died on August 5, 1888 at Nonquitt, Massachusetts, he held the highest ranking position in the U.S. armed forces. Sheridan is popularly regarded as one of the three most prominent Union gen­ erals from the Civil War, along with Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman.2 Sheridan's burial in front of the main entrance of Arlington House ushered in an era in which interment at Arlington was desirable. A series of interments of major generals and an admiral followed Sheridan's burial: General George Crook 1890 Admiral David Porter 1891 General Montgomery Meigs 1892 General Abner Doubleday 1893 General Stephen Burbridge 1894 General Walter Gresham 1895 General John Gibbon 1896 General John Mason 1897 General William Rosecrans 1898 General Horatio Wright 1899 The next sequence which gradually increased the status of Arlington Na­ tional Cemetery was the series of interments of 95 Civil War Mydal of Honor recipients.
    [Show full text]