DOCSLIB.ORG

Iowa Judicial Branch 2020 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iowa Judicial Branch 2020 Annual Report IOWA JUDICIAL BRANCH 2020 ANNUAL REPORT SERVING IOWA’S COMMUNITIES DURING A PANDEMIC Image: Jasper County Courtroom Our Mission The Iowa Judicial Branch dedicates itself to providing independent and accessible forums for the fair and prompt resolution of disputes, administering justice under law equally to all persons. Our Core Values Fairness Accessibility Integrity Independence Efficiency Image: Iowa Judicial Branch Building Serving Iowa’s Communities During a Pandemic It is astounding to reflect on the last nine months Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, and consider all the changes in the ways the courts and worked with the University of Iowa College of provide services. In early March when the first Public Health, the Iowa Department of Public Health, positive COVID-19 tests were reported, our court county health departments, and a wide range of system, which is historically grounded on face-to-face court users for guidance on safely resuming many in- services and trials, suddenly needed to limit in-person person services and, for a short time, jury trials. In services in order to mitigate the spread of the virus. addition, we looked to the governor’s office for the Many restrictions were put in place and government CARES Act funding used to purchase the personal buildings closed but, through it all, the court system protective equipment and technology needed to did not shut down. All 101 clerks of court offices continue to offer court services to our friends and remained open for Iowans with emergency matters neighbors while doing all we could to reduce the and our judicial officers conducted many court spread of the virus. proceedings remotely. Through it all, a key to providing statewide court Iowa courts were able to remain open and services was the public’s ability to file court operating—safely—because of the dedication, documents electronically and court staff’s ability to support, and guidance of many people. Our judges manage the docket remotely. We are grateful for the utilized technology to hold court remotely. Clerks legislature’s long history of funding the technological and their staff rotated shifts, some working from infrastructure needed for electronic filing. home to limit the possible spread of the virus and others working in the courthouses for emergencies The judicial branch appreciates the support of all and essential cases. Juvenile court officers found the people and organizations who answered the new ways to maintain meaningful supervision of call when we most needed guidance. With that the juveniles in their charge. And because most assistance and a dedicated workforce, your courts all of these new and vital ways to keep the judicial were able to face the crisis head-on and respond branch operating at maximum capacity required the quickly to keep our courts open to the fullest use of technology, the Judicial Branch Information extent possible while keeping our people safe and Technology professionals were around the state protecting our communities. installing the tools needed to safely serve the public. Your courts could not have provided these vital services without the support and cooperation of the attorneys and citizens who rely on the court system. Court users were faced with new technology yet remained patient while we worked through the glitches common in any new approach. We also benefited greatly from our longtime working relationships with the 99 county boards of supervisors who responded quickly as we coordinated our efforts to slow the spread of the virus. We relied upon various experts to gather the information needed to provide a safe workplace for Susan Larson Christensen Todd Nuccio the public and our staff. Two diverse task forces— Chief Justice State Court Administrator Jumpstart Jury Trials Task Force and Jumpstart Family Law Trials Task Force—reviewed the Centers for 1 IOWA COURTS PANDEMIC RESPONSE MITIGATING COVID-19 Beginning in early March, the judicial branch was preparing to minimize the impact of COVID-19. In the span of just a few weeks, the planning effort transitioned into the need for immediate actions. As the pandemic worsened and more information about the virus and how it could affect the courts became available, the Iowa Supreme Court issued orders to protect the public and court employees while keeping the courts as open and operational as possible. Between March 12 and November 24, nearly thirty supervisory orders were issued. Throughout, the supreme court communicated with Iowans through a dedicated page on the Iowa Judicial Branch website with COVID-19-related orders, news releases, updates, and information. After Governor Reynolds signed an order prohibiting gatherings of more than ten people, the supreme court suspended most in-person court services beginning on March 17. With the guidance of experts, the supreme court developed detailed procedures and a schedule for resuming in-person court services and jury trials along with a list of priority cases and duties to guide judges, magistrates, and court staff in the scheduling, hearing, and handling of cases. PPE was acquired, courtrooms were updated with new technology and reconfigured to allow for physical distancing, and electronic displays were installed to reduce the need for physical contact with exhibits. State court administration identified the equipment, technology, and services necessary to safely resume operations, submitted applications for grant funding to support these needs, developed processes to record and monitor expenditure of grant funds, and collected information from formal task forces and informal groups of employees and stakeholders to ensure that court safety measures work as intended. The judicial branch anticipates the need to continue operating with a range of public health safety protocols in place for the foreseeable future. As such, efforts to monitor, refine, and improve public health measures in use by Iowa’s courts will continue into 2021. 2 IOWA SUPREME COURT ORDERS IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19 MARCH–APRIL 2020 Supreme court postpones all new jury trials, keeps clerk of court offices open “The Iowa Judicial Branch is instituting procedures to keep the courts open to the fullest possible extent while protecting public safety by mitigating the impact of coronavirus/COVID‑19.” Iowa Supreme Court Order, March 14, 2020 Supreme court allows new court procedures to slow the spread of COVID-19 “We must keep our courts open to the fullest extent for abused and neglected children, victims seeking protection, troubled youths, law enforcement, and families in crisis. Today’s order balances those needs with our concern for the health and wellbeing of our communities.” Chief Justice Susan Christensen March 17, 2020 Supreme court applauds legal hotline, encourages Iowa lawyers to volunteer “As Iowans’ need for legal information and services continues to grow, the Court strongly encourages each Iowa lawyer to volunteer. Everyone in the legal community has an interest and responsibility to ensure access to justice. Barriers undermine public trust and confidence in the courts.” Chief Justice Susan Christensen, April 17, 2020 MAY–JUNE 2020 Supreme court orders new timeline to safely resume face-to-face court proceedings “We know that people and families with pending cases are anxious to have their day in court, but we must first ensure that the public and court personnel have confidence that appropriate cautionary measures have been taken to protect their health when entering our courtrooms.” Chief Justice Susan Christensen, May 22, 2020 Courts and counties approve a safety checklist for courthouses “This checklist is a product of true collaboration between counties and the Judicial Branch. We are looking forward to opening courthouses back up for business in our communities, but we want to do so in a way that every employee is safe and every citizen can safely access the important services they offer.” Iowa State Association of Counties President Burlin Matthews, June 10, 2020 JULY–SEPTEMBER 2020 Supreme court issues orders for guidance as courts resume face-to-face services “It is so very important that Iowans feel comfortable returning to their courthouses for essential court services that must be done face‑to‑face.” Chief Justice Susan Christensen, July 9, 2020 Supreme court issues policies and procedures for resumption of jury trials “This is another measured next step as we resume more face‑to‑face court services throughout the state. Jury trials are guaranteed by the Constitution and are essential to providing justice for Iowans. These procedures are intended to protect the health and safety of our citizens as they resume their critical duties as jurors.” Justice Matthew McDermott, July 22, 2020 OCTOBER–DECEMBER 2020 Iowa Supreme Court postpones jury trials until February 2021 “The courts compel citizens to serve on juries and Iowans consistently respond by doing their civic duty. With the current high rate of COVID‑19 positive tests in the state, it is time to pause jury trials to protect public safety and mitigate the impact of the virus.” Chief Justice Susan Christensen, November 10, 2020 3 COURTS MEETING COVID-19 CHALLENGES After a six-month pause in jury trials, protocols recommended by the Jumpstart Jury Trials Task Force were in place for jurors to serve as safely IOWANS CAN as possible. Iowans involved in jury trials with the new safety protocols SAFELY SERVE overwhelmingly reported feeling safe, having positive experiences, and appreciating the court’s health
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Harvard University
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY ROBERT AND RENÉE BELFER CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 2000-2001 ANNUAL REPORT 2 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 2000-2001 Annual Report Director’s Foreword 5 Overview From the Executive Director 7 Environment and Natural Resources Program TABLE 8 OF Harvard Information Infrastructure Project 52 CONTENTS International Security Program 71 Science, Technology and Public Policy Program 109 Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project 155 WPF Program on Intrastate Conflict, Conflict Prevention, and Conflict Resolution 177 Events 188 Publications 219 Biographies 241 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 3 2000-2001 Annual Report 4 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 2000-2001 Annual Report Director’s Foreword —————————————♦ For the hub of the John F. Kennedy School’s research, teaching, and training in international security affairs, environmental and resource issues, conflict prevention and resolution, and science and technology policy, the first academic year of the new century has been bracing. According to our mission statement, The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs strives to provide leadership in advancing policy-relevant knowledge about the most important challenges of international security and other critical issues where science, technology, and international affairs intersect. BCSIA’s leadership begins with the recognition of science and technology as driving forces transforming threats and opportunities in international affairs. The Center integrates insights of social scientists, technologists, and practitioners with experience in government, diplomacy, the military, and business to address critical issues. BCSIA involvement in both the Republican and Democratic campaigns. BCSIA was privileged to have senior advisors in both camps in one of the most unforgettable American elections in recent memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Courts at a Glance
    Courts at a Glance For Everyone From Students to Seniors Published by Iowa Judicial Branch Branches of American Government Separation of Powers The governmental system of the United States uses separation of powers. This means that the government has separate branches that deal with different as- pects of governing. These three branches are the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This system is in place for both the federal (national) and state governments. The legislative branch, which on the national level is the U.S. Congress, passes new laws. The executive branch, headed by the president, enforces laws. The judicial branch, headed by the U.S. Supreme Court, inter- prets laws. While each branch has its own duties, the other branches of govern- ment have some control over its actions. These interactions are called checks and balances. Checks and balances keep one branch of government from being much stronger than the others. See the diagram below for U.S. checks and balances. U.S. Checks & Balances Confirms or rejects appointments by executive (including judges) Can veto legislation Apppoints judges È È È È Legislative Executive Judicial Writes laws Enforces laws Interprets laws Ç Ç Can declare acts of the legislative or executive branch to be unconstitutional Role of the Judicial Branch Every state and the federal government have an independent judicial branch to interpret and apply state and federal laws to specific cases. By providing a place where people can go to resolve disputes according to law, through a fair process, and before a knowledgeable and neutral judge or jury, the judicial branch helps to maintain peace and order in society.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Iowa District Court for Polk County Aiden Vasquez
    E-FILED 2021 APR 22 9:53 AM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY ) AIDEN VASQUEZ, an individual, ) ) Petitioner, ) Case No. ) v. ) ) PETITION FOR JUDICIAL IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN ) REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTION SERVICES, an independent executive-branch ) UNDER IOWA CODE § 17A.19 agency of the State of Iowa, ) ) Respondent. ) ) COMES NOW Petitioner Aiden Vasquez (“Mr. Vasquez”), by his undersigned counsel, and respectfully submits the following petition for judicial review of agency action: STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1. This action arises from Section 441.78.1(4) of the Iowa Administrative Code’s (“IAC 441.78.1(4)” or the “Regulation”) ban on Medicaid coverage for surgical treatment of “transsexualism,” “gender identity disorder,” and “sex reassignment.” 2. The State of Iowa’s Medicaid program (“Iowa Medicaid”) provides coverage for medically necessary care for a broad range of medical conditions. The Regulation, however, bars Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming surgery to treat gender dysphoria, a medical condition only experienced by transgender individuals, even though Medicaid coverage is provided for the same surgical procedures for other medical conditions. 3. The Regulation “specifically exclude[s]” coverage for “[p]rocedures related to transsexualism . [or] gender identity disorders.” See Iowa Admin. Code r. 441.78.1(4)(b)(2). It also states that “[s]urgeries for the purpose of sex reassignment are not considered as restoring bodily function and are excluded from coverage.” See Iowa Admin. Code r. 441.78.1(4). E-FILED 2021 APR 22 9:53 AM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT 4. The Regulation’s discriminatory exclusion for gender-affirming surgery has no basis in medical science and reflects views on gender dysphoria that have been uniformly condemned by leading medical organizations for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the COURT of APPEALS of IOWA No. 16-0435 Filed February
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0435 Filed February 22, 2017 CEDAR RAPIDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MARLA MARIE LEAF, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Patrick R. Grady, Judge. Marla Leaf appeals from the assessment of a civil fine imposed under Cedar Rapids’ automated traffic enforcement (ATE) ordinance. AFFIRMED. James C. Larew of Larew Law Office, Iowa City, for appellant. Patricia G. Kropf of the Cedar Rapids City Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, for appellee. Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Doyle and McDonald, JJ. 2 DOYLE, Judge. Marla Leaf appeals from the assessment of a civil fine for violating section 61.138 of the Cedar Rapids Municipal Code, the City’s automated traffic enforcement (ATE) ordinance. She asserts the City failed to prove by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence that her car exceeded the speed limit, and she argues the ATE ordinance and its implementation by the City violates her constitutional rights and violates state law. We affirm. I. Background Facts and Procedural History. Marla Leaf received an ATE Notice of Violation alleging a speed camera captured her car traveling at a speed above the posted limit. Specifically, the Notice alleged that at 1:59 p.m. on February 5, 2015, an automated speed camera clocked Leaf’s Ford Mustang traveling sixty-eight miles per hour in a fifty- five mile-per-hour zone on Interstate 380 (I-380) southbound at J Avenue in the city of Cedar Rapids. The Notice informed Leaf that: Under Ordinance 61.138.C.2 of the Municipal Code of the City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, the owner of the motor vehicle is liable for payment of a civil penalty if the owner’s vehicle enters an intersection or other location within the city against a speed enforcement system traveling at a speed above the posted limit.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Court Clerk and Court Support Staff Workload Assessment Study, 2016
    Iowa Court Clerk and Court Support Staff Workload Assessment Study, 2016 Final Report May 2017 THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS Iowa Court Clerk and Court Support Staff Workload Assessment Study, 2016 Final Report May 2017 Court Consulting Division National Center for State Courts Iowa Court Clerk and Court Support Staff Workload Assessment Study, 2016 Final Report May 18, 2017 Acknowledgments The authors wish to acknowledge the invaluable Project Staff contributions of the clerks and court support staff who contributed to this weighted caseload study. Suzanne Tallarico John Douglas Over the course of this study, we were fortunate to work with a distinguished Court Clerk and Support Staff Workload Formula Committee, which included experienced clerks of district court and other clerk office National Center for State Courts and district court administration staff from across the state. Court Consulting Division Daniel J. Hall, Vice President We also extend a special note of thanks to John Goerdt, Deputy State Court Administrator, for his ongoing availability and behind-the-scenes assistance throughout this project. Clerk & Court Staff Workload Formula Committee Damian Baltes, Clerk of Court, Chickasaw & Howard Counties Julie Kneip, Clerk of Court, Bremer & Floyd Counties Laurie Janssen, Clerk of Court, Clay & O’Brien Counties Ruth Godfrey, Clerk of Court, Pottawattamie County Josh Miller, Supervisor, Polk County Kelly Ruhnke, Clerk of Court, Marion & Jasper Counties Roxann Repstein, Clerk of Court, Linn & Jones Counties Kim Hess, Clerk of Court, Clinton & Jackson Counties Julie Johnson, Clerk of Court, Washington County Amanda Collins, Judicial Specialist, Woodbury County Lori Johannes, Case Coordinator, Pottawattamie County Paula Martinez, Judicial Specialist, Polk County Leesa McNeil, District Court Administrator, District 3 Carroll Edmondson, District Court Administrator, District 6 Committee Staff John Goerdt, Deputy State Court Administrator Scott Ruhnke, Court Liaison, State Court Administration Table of Contents Executive Summary i I.
    [Show full text]
  • State Judicial Nomination Commission And
    STATE JUDICIAL NOMINATION COMMISSION AND OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR JOINT JUDICIAL APPLICATION Please complete this application by placing your responses in normal type, immediately beneath each request for information. Requested documents should be attached at the end of the application or in separate PDF files, clearly identifying the numbered request to which each document is responsive. Completed applications are public records. If you cannot fully respond to a question without disclosing information that is confidential under state or federal law, please submit that portion of your answer separately, along with your legal basis for considering the information confidential. Do not submit opinions or other writing samples containing confidential information unless you are able to appropriately redact the document to avoid disclosing the identity of the parties or other confidential information. PERSONAL INFORMATION 1. State your full name. Mary Elizabeth Chicchelly 2. State your current occupation or title. (Lawyers: identify name of firm, organization, or government agency; judicial officers: identify title and judicial election district.) Iowa District Court Judge – Sixth Judicial District 3. State your date of birth (to determine statutory eligibility). December 1, 1967 4. State your current city and county of residence. Cedar Rapids, Linn County, Iowa 1 (Adopted June 17, 2019) PROFESSIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL HISTORY 5. List in reverse chronological order each college and law school you attended including the dates of attendance, the degree awarded, and your reason for leaving each school if no degree from that institution was awarded. College(s) and Law School(s) Dates Degree(s) Month/Yr – and reason for leaving, if applicable Attended Received (Mo/Yr to Mo/Yr) National Judicial College, General Jurisdiction, 04/14-05/14 Course May 2014 Reno, NV Completed University of Iowa College of Law, Iowa City, Iowa 08/89-05/92 J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedited Civil Actions in Iowa – a Defense Perspective by Stephen E
    Dedicated to improving our civil justice system DEFENSE UPDATE SPRING 2016 VOL. XVIII, No. 2 Find us on Facebook, Twitter & LinkedIn How Did We Get Here? Where Are We Going? Expedited Civil Actions In Iowa – A Defense Perspective by Stephen E. Doohen and Siobhan Briley, Whitfield & Eddy, PLC, Des Moines, IA Renowned guitarist Joe Satriani asks the above questions in the lyrics of his 1989 song, “I Believe.” Pop-culture references aside, those same questions perhaps come to mind when Iowa defense practitioners contemplate a new docket in the Iowa district courts. On January 1, 2015, Iowa joined a handful of other states1 in enacting a rule providing for expedited civil actions. With the adoption of Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.281, a plaintiff bringing a civil action (except small claims and domestic relations) may elect to proceed on an expedited basis, where the only relief sought is monetary, and all claims for damages total $75,000 or less.2 Two months ago, in February 2016, the author defended an expedited action that was tried to a jury in the Iowa Stephen E. Doohen District Court for Polk County. Trying an expedited jury trial, at least for this practitioner, was a new experience, although not altogether unfamiliar. In many respects, it was just like any other jury trial. Likewise, the author took part in a panel discussion on the subject at the recent annual seminar sponsored by the Iowa Academy of Trial Lawyers, held in Des Moines in late February. Questions and comments from the audience during this panel discussion (from both the plaintiff and defense bar) were probing and thought provoking.
    [Show full text]
  • Turn Ballot Over
    1111 • Ill 111111 Ill OFFICIAL BALLOT General Election Precinct Official's Initials Winnebago County, Iowa Tuesday, November 3, 2020 King Linden 00200 INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS Federal Offices State Offices Using blue or black ink, completely fill in For President and For State Senator the oval next to your choice like this:e Vice President District 4 Write-in: To vote for a valid write-in Vote for no more than ONE Team Vote for no more than One candidate, write the person's name on O Donald J. Trump REP 0 Dennis Guth REP the line provided and darken the oval. Michael R. Pence 0 Notice to voters: To vote to approve o Joseph R. Biden DEM any question on this ballot, fill in the oval Kamala D. Harris twrite-in vote if anv\ in front of the word "Yes". To vote For State Representative against a question, fill in the oval in front 0 Roque Rocky De La ALL District 7 of the word "No". Fuente Darcy G. Richardson Vote for no more than One Do not cross out. If you change your 0 Don Blankenship CON O Henry Stone REP mind, exchange your ballot for a new William Alan Mohr one. ~-- Debra Jensen DEM .. The Judicial Ballot is located on the 0 Ricki Sue King GKH .) Dayna R. Chandler back of this ballot, beginning in the middle column. 1t11,_:,.,.;.in ··-•- if--··' o Howie Hawkins GRN County.Offices Political Organizations Angela Nicole Walker Republican Party (REP) For CountyAuditor Democratic Party (DEM) o Jo Jorgensen LIB Jeremy Cohen Vote for no more than One Alliance Party (ALL) .--- REP •., Karla Weiss Constitution Party of Iowa (CON) Genealogy Know Your Family History 0 Brock Pierce C (GKH) Karla Ballard Green Party (GRN) {Write-in vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Winneshiek County, Iowa Annual Financial Report
    Winneshiek County, Iowa Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017 Benjamin D. Steines Winneshiek County Auditor and Commissioner of Elections Lynne Bullerman, Deputy Tony Clarke, Deputy Lauri Kaeser, Deputy INTRODUCTION To the Honorable Board of Supervisors and Taxpayers of Winneshiek County, Iowa: I submit herewith the One Hundred Fifteenth Annual Report of Winneshiek County, the purpose being to give in a concise and simple form the receipts and expenditures of the county, together with such other information as is deemed of interest to the taxpayers. It is hoped that a study of this report will be the means of familiarizing the taxpayers with the finances of the county. Our services are offered at all times in ascertaining facts with regard to anything connected with this office. The same cordial treatment is extended from every office in the Courthouse. Respectfully submitted, Benjamin D. Steines Official Directory UNITED STATES SENATORS Charles E. Grassley (R) Joni Ernst (R) Term ends January, 2017 Term ends January, 2021 Iowa Office Iowa Office 210 Walnut Street 210 Walnut Street Room 721, Federal Building Room 733, Federal Building Des Moines, IA 50309-2140 Des Moines, IA 50309-2140 (515) 288-1145 (515) 284-4574 FAX: (515) 288-5097 FAX: (515) 284-4937 Washington, DC Office Washington, DC Office 135 Hart Senate Office Building 825 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510-1501 Washington, DC 20510-5497 (202) 224-3744 (202) 224-3254 FAX: (202) 224-6020 FAX: (202) 224-9369 U.S. FOURTH CONGRESSIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • The Iowa Lawyer
    THE L AW Y ER IOWADecember 2019/January 2020 V 79 N 11 CREATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR BETTER WORK-LIFE BALANCE p. 7 FDA. USDA. EPA. We’ve Got It Covered. McKee, Voorhees & Sease provides its clients a level of protection for their products that is unlike any other in FDA, USDA, and EPA regulatory and product development industry. In a regulated environment, careful coordination of intellectual property and regulatory strategy from initiation through post-launch is critical for successful product development & commercialization. Intellectual Regulatory: Business Product Property Local, National, Global Development Development • Freedom to Operate • Analyzing • Startups • Project and • Patents & Trade Requirements • Funding Portfolio Secrets • Regulatory Data • Collaborations and Management • Licensing Package & Joint Ventures • Risk Assessment • Patent Exhaustion Approvals • Mergers & and Mitigation • IP Enforcement • Stewardship Acquisitions • Launch and Post- • Compliance Launch Planning For more information regarding regulatory, IP and product development law, please visit our website or call (515) 288-3667 and ask to speak with Cassie Edgar, Chair of the Regulatory & Product Development Law practice group. Your Worldwide IP Partner Since 1924™ PATENTS • TRADEMARKS • COPYRIGHTS • REGULATORY LAW TRADE SECRETS • ENTERTAINMENT LAW • LICENSING • LITIGATION The official publication of The Iowa State Bar Association. EDITORIAL TEAM Editor-in-Chief General Inquiries Melissa Higgins 515-243-3179 515-697-7896 [email protected] [email protected] Copy Editor Steve Boeckman 515-697-7869 [email protected] THE IOWA LAWYER (ISSN 1052-5327) is published monthly, except for the combined December-January issue, by The Iowa State Bar Association, 625 East Court Ave., Des Moines, IA 50309-1904. One copy of each issue is furnished to association members as part of their annual dues.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifting the Veil on Iowa Piercing Jurisprudence and Suggestions for Reform
    LIFTING THE VEIL ON IOWA PIERCING JURISPRUDENCE AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM Matthew G. Doré ABSTRACT Like courts in other states, Iowa courts employ a multifactor test for veil piercing that evaluates business owners and their entities based on undercapitalization, commingling of finances, failure to observe formalities, and the like. Yet Iowa precedent assigns no weight to any of these factors, offers few insights concerning their meaning, and gives even less guidance on the factors’ relationship to the justifications for piercing. This Article outlines a path for bringing greater order and predictability to Iowa’s piercing jurisprudence, starting with a taxonomy based on legal scholars’ consensus that courts are justified in piercing when those controlling the entity do one or more of the following: (1) use the corporate privilege to evade obligations imposed by other legal schemes; (2) engage in fraud, misrepresentation, or similar deceptive behavior to obtain corporate credit; or (3) engage in abusive self-dealing that improperly subordinates creditor claims to corporate assets. If one first identifies the asserted policy justification for piercing in a particular case, this Article explains, it becomes easier to assess whether traditional piercing “factors” such as undercapitalization, commingling of finances, or failure to follow formalities warrant application of the remedy and why. Accordingly, this Article recommends Iowa courts require piercing plaintiffs to identify one or more of the foregoing policy justifications for the piercing remedy before determining whether any traditional piercing factors support granting that relief. This Article also challenges Iowa’s tradition of leaving piercing decisions to juries. Piercing is an equitable remedy that judges should administer without juries, this Article argues, but even if piercing is a legal claim, a decision to grant or withhold the piercing remedy is a lawmaking and policymaking exercise and thus a legal question for the court.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Iowa Court of Appeals
    Doyle 7.1 2/22/2012 3:16 PM HISTORY OF THE IOWA COURT OF APPEALS Hon. Rosemary Shaw Sackett* Hon. Richard H. Doyle** I. Early History ............................................................................................. 1 II. Creation of the Iowa Court of Appeals .................................................. 3 III. The Court in Controversy ...................................................................... 10 IV. The Early Five-Judge Court .................................................................. 12 V. Changes .................................................................................................... 18 VI. The Expansion of the Iowa Court of Appeals ..................................... 20 VII. Ten-Year Anniversary ............................................................................ 22 VIII. Transitions ............................................................................................... 23 IX. Six Judges to Nine ................................................................................... 28 X. Further Transitions ................................................................................. 31 XI. Current Work of the Iowa Court of Appeals ...................................... 38 In celebration of the Iowa Court of Appeals’ thirty-fifth anniversary, we look back on its history. I. EARLY HISTORY The organic law of territorial Iowa vested judicial power in “a supreme court, district courts, probate courts, and in justices of the peace.”1 There was no provision for an intermediate
    [Show full text]