Post-Office Annual Directory, ' From
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
FISCAL YEAR 2020 ANNUAL REPORT March 2021
FISCAL YEAR 2020 ANNUAL REPORT March 2021 FCRPS Cultural Resources Program Rock imagery before and after graffiti removal at McNary site 45BN1753. FY 2020 Annual Report Under the FCRPS Systemwide Programmatic Agreement for the Management of Historic Properties – March 2021 This page intentionally left blank. 2 FY 2020 Annual Report Under the FCRPS Systemwide Programmatic Agreement for the Management of Historic Properties – March 2021 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS APE Area of Potential Effects ARPA Archaeological Resource Protection Act BPA Bonneville Power Administration CFR Code of Federal Regulations Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CRITFE Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries Enforcement CRMP Cultural Resources Management Plan CSKT Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation CTCR Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation CTUIR Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation CTWSRO Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon DAHP Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation FCRPS Federal Columbia River Power System FCRPS Program FCRPS Cultural Resource Program FNF Flathead National Forest FY Fiscal year GIS Geographic Information Systems H/A CTCR History/Archaeology Program HMU Habitat management unit HPMP Historic Property Management Plan HPRCSIT Historic Property of Religious and Cultural Significance to Indian Tribes ID Idaho ISU Idaho State University KNF Kootenai National Forest 3 FY 2020 Annual Report Under the FCRPS Systemwide Programmatic Agreement for the Management of Historic Properties – March 2021 Lead Federal Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Agencies and the Bureau of Reclamation LiDAR Light detection and ranging MPD Multiple Property Documentation MT Montana NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Nez Perce/NPT Nez Perce Tribe NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NPS National Park Service NPTCRP Nez Perce Tribe Cultural Resource Program NRHP National Register of Historic Places NWP Portland District, U.S. -
1 Illinois Nature Preserves Commission Minutes of the 206
Illinois Nature Preserves Commission Minutes of the 206th Meeting (Approved at the 207th Meeting) Burpee Museum of Natural History 737 North Main Street Rockford, IL 61103 Tuesday, September 21, 2010 206-1) Call to Order, Roll Call, and Introduction of Attendees At 10:05 a.m., pursuant to the Call to Order of Chair Riddell, the meeting began. Deborah Stone read the roll call. Members present: George Covington, Donnie Dann, Ronald Flemal, Richard Keating, William McClain, Jill Riddell, and Lauren Rosenthal. Members absent: Mare Payne and David Thomas. Chair Riddell stated that the Governor has appointed the following Commissioners: George M. Covington (replacing Harry Drucker), Donald (Donnie) R. Dann (replacing Bruce Ross- Shannon), William E. McClain (replacing Jill Allread), and Dr. David L. Thomas (replacing John Schwegman). It was moved by Rosenthal, seconded by Flemal, and carried that the following resolution be approved: The Illinois Nature Preserves Commission wishes to recognize the contributions of Jill Allread during her tenure as a Commissioner from 2000 to 2010. Jill served with distinction as Chair of the Commission from 2002 to 2004. She will be remembered for her clear sense of direction, her problem solving abilities, and her leadership in taking the Commission’s message to the broader public. Her years of service with the Commission and her continuing commitment to and advocacy for the Commission will always be greatly appreciated. (Resolution 2089) It was moved by Rosenthal, seconded by Flemal, and carried that the following resolution be approved: The Illinois Nature Preserves Commission wishes to recognize the contributions of Harry Drucker during his tenure as a Commissioner from 2001 to 2010. -
The Old and New Towns of Edinburgh World Heritage Site Management Plan
The Old and New Towns of Edinburgh World Heritage Site Management Plan July 2005 Prepared by Edinburgh World Heritage on behalf of the Scottish Ministers, the City of Edinburgh Council and the Minister for Media and Heritage Foreword en years on from achieving World Heritage Site status we are proud to present Edinburgh’s first World Heritage Site Management Plan. The Plan provides a framework T for conservation in the heart of Scotland’s capital city. The preparation of a plan to conserve this superb ‘world’ city is an important step on a journey which began when early settlers first colonised Castle Rock in the Bronze Age, at least 3,000 years ago. Over three millennia, the city of Edinburgh has been shaped by powerful historical forces: political conflict, economic hardship, the eighteenth century Enlightenment, Victorian civic pride and twentieth century advances in science and technology. Today we have a dynamic city centre, home to 24,000 people, the work place of 50,000 people and the focus of a tourism economy valued at £1 billion per annum. At the beginning of this new millennium, communication technology allows us to send images of Edinburgh’s World Heritage Site instantly around the globe, from the broadcasted spectacle of a Festival Fireworks display to the personal message from a visitor’s camera phone. It is our responsibility to treasure the Edinburgh World Heritage Site and to do so by embracing the past and enhancing the future. The World Heritage Site is neither a museum piece, nor a random collection of monuments. It is today a complex city centre which daily absorbs the energy of human endeavour. -
Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendices
This document can be accessed on the Shawnee National Forest website: www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/shawnee. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Shawnee National Forest Forest Plan FEIS Appendix A – Forest Plan Revision Issues and Public Involvement APPENDIX A FOREST PLAN REVISION ISSUES AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT I. INTRODUCTION The first SNF Land and Resource Management Plan (Plan) was approved on November 24, 1986. In 1988, following 23 administrative appeals, the Forest met with appellants and reached a settlement agreement. Significant changes in the Plan resulted in an amended Forest Plan signed in 1992. A lawsuit on nine counts was filed against the Plan in 1994. The court ruled in favor of the Forest Service on five counts and in favor of the plaintiffs on four. The court remanded the entire Plan, but allowed implementation, enjoining specific activities, including commercial, hardwood-timber harvest, ATV trail designation and oil and gas development. -
Development Brief Princes Street Block 10 Approved by the Planning Commitee 15 May 2008 DEVELOPMENT BRIEF BLOCK 10
Development Brief Princes Street Block 10 Approved by the Planning Commitee 15 May 2008 DEVELOPMENT BRIEF BLOCK 10 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Site and context 2 3.0 Planning Policy Context 4 4.0 Considerations 6 4.1 Architectural Interest 4.2 Land uses 4.4 Setting 4.5 Transport and Movement 4.12 Nature Conservation/Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes 4.16 Archaeological Interests 4.17 Contaminated land 4.18 Sustainability 5.0 Development Principles 12 6.0 Implementation 16 1 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Following the Planning Committee approval of the City Centre Princes Street Development Framework (CCPSDF) on 4 October 2007, the Council have been progressing discussions on the individual development blocks contained within the Framework area. The CCPSDF set out three key development principles based on reconciling the needs of the historic environment with contemporary users, optimising the site’s potential through retail-led mixed uses and creating a high quality built environment and public realm. It is not for this development brief to repeat these principles but to further develop them to respond to this area of the framework, known as Block 10. 1.2 The purpose of the development brief is to set out the main planning and development principles on which development proposals for the area should be based. The development brief will be a material consideration in the determination of planning applications that come forward for the area. 2.0 Site and context The Site 2.1 The development brief area is situated at the eastern end of the city centre and is the least typical of all the development blocks within the CCPSDF area. -
National Register of Historic Places Inventoiynomination Form 1. Name
___ _______ _____ I.. .- i.,,.z,...,.....a.......... __-_........,_...-4.. - -*_3__********_***____ - 0MB No 1024-0010 NP:’, orm ¶0-900 Cxp, 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received InventoiyNomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries-complete applicable sections 1. Name -- t’istoric__Oakland Historic District and or common 2. Location street& number VictoryHigway_____ N. A Congressional District #2 city.town Burrillyille N.vicinityot Hon. Claudine Schneider state Rhode Is land code 44 county Providence code 007 3. Classification Category Ownership Status - Present Use ._L district public x occupied agriculture museum buildings private x unoccupied ._JL commercial park structure X.both - work in progress educational - X private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object NA.in process _.X yes: restricted government scientific being considered - yes: unrestricted X industrial transportation Opel, a c’c no military . other: 4. Owner of Property name Multiple see owners list on file at R. I .11. p . C. street & number city, town vicinity of. state 5. Location Of Legal Description - courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Burril lville Town Hal I street& number 70 Main Street city,town l:!arrisville stateRhode island 02833 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Historic and Architectural Resources title of Burrillville--A Preliminaryhas this property been determined -
Ward, Christopher J. (2010) It's Hard to Be a Saint in the City: Notions of City in the Rebus Novels of Ian Rankin. Mphil(R) Thesis
Ward, Christopher J. (2010) It's hard to be a saint in the city: notions of city in the Rebus novels of Ian Rankin. MPhil(R) thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1865/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] It’s Hard To Be A Saint In The City: Notions of City in the Rebus Novels of Ian Rankin Christopher J Ward Submitted for the degree of M.Phil (R) in January 2010, based upon research conducted in the department of Scottish Literature and Faculty of Arts, University of Glasgow © Christopher J Ward, 2010 Contents Acknowledgements 3 Introduction: The Crime, The Place 4 The juncture of two traditions 5 Influence and intent: the origins of Rebus 9 Combining traditions: Rebus comes of age 11 Noir; Tartan; Tartan Noir 13 Chapter One: Noir - The City in Hard-Boiled Fiction 19 Setting as mode: urban versus rural 20 Re-writing the Western: the emergence of hard-boiled fiction 23 The hard-boiled city as existential wasteland 27 ‘Down these mean streets a man must -
CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT Introduction the Princes Street Heritage Framework Study Area Comprises a Lo
PRINCES STREET – CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT Introduction The Princes Street Heritage Framework study area comprises a long, section of the city centre extending along the full length of Princes Street, over a single city block and bounded by Rose Street to the north. The site lies within the New Town Conservation Area and the Edinburgh World Heritage Site. The site contains a substantial number of buildings included on the Statutory List of Buildings of Historic or Architectural Interest (14 Category A, 79 Category B, and 11 Category C). The purpose of the Heritage Framework was to better understand the features, details and planned form which give the area its historic character and identity, and to provide a context for its preservation, development and management. The study established the development sequence and form of the surviving James Craig plan, the individual historic structures and the townscape. A more detailed understanding and assessment of the character, quality and comparative cultural significance of individual buildings is now required as a prerequisite to making decisions about the future of the area. Cultural significance refers to the collection of values associated with a place which together identify why it is important. The Burra Charter suggests that ‘Cultural significance is embodied in the place itself, its fabric, setting, use, associations, meanings, records, related places and related objects’. Where decisions are being made about the future of historic buildings, their historic and architectural significance should be adequately assessed. This should form part of the master planning and design process, and the assessment undertaken at the earliest opportunity and before detailed proposals are drawn up for the regeneration. -
Exceptional Retail/Leisure Opportunity in the Heart of Edinburgh 71 George Street Welcome to the Sunny Side of the Street
Exceptional retail/leisure opportunity in the heart of Edinburgh 71 George Street Welcome to the sunny side of the street 71 George Street occupies a prime corner location on Edinburgh’s premier shopping street, home to some of the UK’s most iconic brands including Aspinals of London, LK Bennett, Hobbs, Bobbi Brown, TM Lewin, Church’s and Anthropologie. With 3,929 sq ft (365 sq m) of south facing space over ground and basement levels available to let, this is a rare opportunity within Edinburgh’s ‘Golden Rectangle’. 02 03 71 George Street Princes Street Gardens Waverley Station Princes Street St Andrews Square George Street St David Street Hanover Street Frederick Street Castle Street Queen Street 04 71 George Street HILL STREET NORTH LANE FREDERICK STREET The Building HILL STREET SOUTH LANE THISTLE STREET LANE SOUTH WEST CAFÉ ROUGE 71 George Street comprising basement, ground and four upper CHARLIE is a Grade A listed building POST MILLER levels where there are plans in place to convert OFFICE HAIR the space to luxury serviced apartments. FAT FACE CHURCH’S LYLE & SCOTT & LYLE JACK WILLS JACK SCOTLAND BANK OF BANK SWEATY BETTY SWEATY PAPERCHASE CADIZ CLYDESDALE BANK CLYDESDALE WHITESTUFF JOULES HAMILTON & INCHES & HAMILTON GEORGE STREET GEORGE STREET ALL SAINTS THE STANDING HOLLISTER LAING THE ORDER JEWELLER FREDERICK STREET LE CREUSET MILLER & CARTER ROSE STREET NORTH LANE ROSE STREET NORTH LANE ROSE STREET 05 71 George Street 4 Michelin starred restaurants in Edinburgh 68% of visitors to Edinburgh surveyed listed Shopping as a key reason for visiting In the neighbourhood 71 George Street is located close to an outstanding range of hotels, bars, cafes and restaurants, as well as hosting some of the UK’s best-known luxury brands. -
Master Plan 2008 Re- Examination
TOWN OF MORRISTOWN MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY MASTER PLAN 2008 RE- EXAMINATION 2003 Master Plan Prepared by and adopted by The Morristown Planning Board August 14, 2003 Re-examination prepared by and adopted by the Morristown Planning Board September 25, 2008 Morristown Master Plan Re-Examination 2008 TRANSMITTAL AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS August 28, 2008 Chairwoman Mary Dougherty Morristown Planning Board 200 South Street Morristown, New Jersey 07963 Dear Chairwoman Dougherty: I am pleased to submit to the Planning Board this 2008 Re-examination of the 2003 Master Plan. The Re-examination was prepared in accordance with the provisions of NJSA40:55D-89. It was presented to the Board and posted on the Town’s web site on July 11, 2008 and discussed by the Board at it’s July 24, 2008 meeting. Because of their age and near obsolescence, the Zone Map, Schedule I and Schedule II were the first elements of the Master Plan to be re-examined. These documents were reviewed by the Long Range Planning Committee of the Planning Board and the public at four meetings between November 2006 and February 2007. Subsequently, they were reviewed by the full Planning Board and the public at two meetings in March 2007. They were presented to the Council on April 10, 2007 and after several meetings were approved on September 11, 2007. Note that this reexamination does not contain a Housing Element. Since the COAH regulations have not been finalized by the State as of this writing, the basic legislation necessary to prepare the Housing Element is yet to be enacted. -
Presentation to the City Council of the Hailey Historic Preservation Commission Recommendations: Recap 3 Public Workshops & Public Comment
The Hailey Historic Preservation Commission Preserving Hailey’s Heritage and Sense of Place Recommendations for the City Council City Council Meeting Presentation to the City Council of the Hailey Historic Preservation Commission recommendations: Recap 3 Public Workshops & public comment. Welcome to all. Thank you for coming! It is our goal that you meet the Hailey Historic Preservation Commission (HPC), and learn about our mission and what we’ve been working on. We’d like to discuss why preservation is important to Hailey, and tell you about our goals and some of the projects we’ve accomplished. We’d like to discuss some draft recommendations to the City Council to create an Historic District as well as Designation of Historic Properties on a volunteer basis. Additionally, we’d like to celebrate some of the fine preservation efforts in Hailey! And finally, we’d love to recruit some new members and volunteers! 1 The Hailey Historic Preservation Commission The HHPC was first established in 1987… It was re-established by ordinance in March 14, 2005. HHPC Board Denise Jackson Ford, Chair Anna Mathieu, Vice Chair Rob Lonning, Secretary Teddie Daley Joan Davies Julie Evans Laura Hall John Seiller Taylor Walker Rick Davis, City Council Liaison Meetings The HHPC meets at 6:30 PM on the last Tuesday of each month at the Hailey City Hall. Introduction: We are a volunteer board, with a wide range of experiences. We are a landscape architect, realtors, developers, the director of the Blaine County Historical Museum, and a lawyer and former P&Z commissioner. Some of us live in old Hailey, all of us love it. -
Toiyabe National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Table of Contents
United States Department of Agriculture NATIONAL FOREST PREFACE This National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) was developed to direct the management of the Toiyabe National Forest. The goal df the Plan is to provide a management program reflective of a mixture of management activities that allow use and protection of Forest resources; fulfill legislative requirements; and address local, regional, and national issues and concerns. To accomplish this, the Forest Plan: SPECIFIES THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES AND THE APPROXIMATE TIMING AND VICINITY OF THE PRACTICES NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THAT DIRECTION; AND ESTABLISHES THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT THE DIRECTION IS CARRIED OUT AND TO DETERMINE HOW WELL OUTPUTS AND EFFECTS WERE PREDICTED. The Forest Plan will be reviewed (and updated if necessary) at least every five years. It will be revised on a IO- to 15-year cycle. Preparation of the Forest Plan is required by the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) as amended by the National Forest Management Act (NFMA). Assessment of its environmental impacts is required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the implementing regulations of NFMA (36 WR 219). The Forest Plan replaces all previous resource management plans prepared for the Toiyabe National Forest. Upon approval of the Forest Plan, all subsequent activities affecting the Forest must be in compliance with the Forest Plan. In addition, all permits, contracts and other instruments for the use and 0 occupancy of National Forest System lands mst be in conformance with the Forest Plan. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANNINC LEVELS Development of this Forest Plan occurs within the framework of Forest Service regional and national planning.