APOCRYPHA 1St ESDRAS of the KING JAMES BIBLE 1611. In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The New Revised Standard Version Bible with Apocrypha: Genuine Leather Black Pdf, Epub, Ebook
THE NEW REVISED STANDARD VERSION BIBLE WITH APOCRYPHA: GENUINE LEATHER BLACK PDF, EPUB, EBOOK NRSV Bible Translation Committee | 1616 pages | 17 Oct 2006 | Oxford University Press Inc | 9780195288315 | English | New York, United States The New Revised Standard Version Bible with Apocrypha: Genuine Leather Black PDF Book Enter email address. This ebook is a selective guide designed to help scholars and students of criminology find reliable sources of information by directing them to the best available scholarly materials in whatever form or format they appear from books, chapters, and journal A: This Bible is printed in Korea. Approximately 85 alterations to the RSV text were authorized in and introduced into the printings. In an effort to further ecumenical relations, the more extensive 50th Anniversary Edition also included some of the preferred Catholic readings in the text and footnotes of the New Testament section. Review this product Share your thoughts with other customers. Featuring an attractive and sturdy binding, this pew Bible will give years of dependable service. Christian Living. This fascinating exploration of Leonardo da Vinci's life and work identifies what it was that made him so unique, and explains the phenomenon of the world's most celebrated artistic genius who, years on, still grips and inspires us. Color maps and a presentation page. Verified Purchase. Sign in or create an account. Harold W Attridge. Members save with free shipping everyday! Q: Is this a full catholic bible with all 73 books and in the right order? New Revised Standard Version. Large print. Main category: Bible translations into English. Related Searches. -
Apocrypha, Part 1
Understanding Apocrypha, Part 1 Sources: Scripture Alone, James R. White, 112-119 The Journey from Texts to Translations: The Origin and Development of the Bible, Paul D. Wegner, 101-130 The Doctrine of the Word of God, John M. Frame, 118-139 Can We Still Believe the Bible? An Evangelical Engagement with Contemporary Questions, by Craig L. Blomberg, 43-54 How We Got the Bible, Neil R. Lightfoot, 152-156 “The Old Testament Canon, Josephus, and Cognitive Environment” by Stephen G. Dempster, in The Enduring Authority of the Christian Scriptures, D.A. Carson, editor, 321-361 “Reflections on Jesus’ View of the Old Testament” by Craig L. Blomberg, in The Enduring Authority of the Christian Scriptures, D.A. Carson, editor, 669-701 “The Canon of the Old Testament” by R.T. Beckwith, in The Origin of the Bible, edited by F.F. Bruce, J.I. Packer, Philip Comfort, Carl F.H. Henry, 51-64 “Do We Have the Right Canon?” by Paul D. Wegner, Terry L. Wilder, and Darrell L. Bock, in In Defense of the Bible: A Comprehensive Apologetic for the Authority of Scripture, edited by Steven B. Cowan and Terry L. Wilder, 393-404 Can I Really Trust the Bible?, Barry Cooper, 49-53 Establishing Our Time Frame What are apocryphal books? The word “apocrypha” refers to something hidden (Protestants and Catholics differ on why the term is applied to particular books). It is a general term often used for books not in the biblical canon (apocryphal books), but is also used by Protestants as a specific term for the books officially canonized by the Roman Catholic Church (The Apocrypha). -
Syllabus, Deuterocanonical Books
The Deuterocanonical Books (Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and additions to Daniel & Esther) Caravaggio. Saint Jerome Writing (oil on canvas), c. 1605-1606. Galleria Borghese, Rome. with Dr. Bill Creasy Copyright © 2021 by Logos Educational Corporation. All rights reserved. No part of this course—audio, video, photography, maps, timelines or other media—may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval devices without permission in writing or a licensing agreement from the copyright holder. Scripture texts in this work are taken from the New American Bible, revised edition © 2010, 1991, 1986, 1970 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C. and are used by permission of the copyright owner. All Rights Reserved. No part of the New American Bible may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the copyright owner. 2 The Deuterocanonical Books (Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and additions to Daniel & Esther) Traditional Authors: Various Traditional Dates Written: c. 250-100 B.C. Traditional Periods Covered: c. 250-100 B.C. Introduction The Deuterocanonical books are those books of Scripture written (for the most part) in Greek that are accepted by Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches as inspired, but they are not among the 39 books written in Hebrew accepted by Jews, nor are they accepted as Scripture by most Protestant denominations. The deuterocanonical books include: • Tobit • Judith • 1 Maccabees • 2 Maccabees • Wisdom (also called the Wisdom of Solomon) • Sirach (also called Ecclesiasticus) • Baruch, (including the Letter of Jeremiah) • Additions to Daniel o “Prayer of Azariah” and the “Song of the Three Holy Children” (Vulgate Daniel 3: 24- 90) o Suzanna (Daniel 13) o Bel and the Dragon (Daniel 14) • Additions to Esther Eastern Orthodox churches also include: 3 Maccabees, 4 Maccabees, 1 Esdras, Odes (which include the “Prayer of Manasseh”) and Psalm 151. -
A New English Translation of the Septuagint. 15 1 Esdras
15-1Es-NETS-4.qxd 11/10/2009 10:26 PM Page 392 1 ESDRAS TO THE READER EDITION OF THE GREEK TEXT The NETS translation of 1 Esdras is based on the standard critical edition prepared by Robert Hanhart (Septuaginta: Vetus Testamentum Graecum Auctoritate Academiae Scientiarum Gottingensis editum VIII.1: Es- drae liber I [Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1974]). OVERVIEW OF THE BOOK This book is known as Esdras A / in the Greek tradition and 1 Esdras in English translations. 1 Esdras and 2 Esdras (Esdras B /) are one pair of double traditions found in Septuagint collections (see as well the double traditions of Daniel and Esther). They represent material from the Hebrew-Aramaic 2 Chronicles (2 Supplements), Ezra (2 Esdras 1–10), and Nehemiah (2 Esdras 11–23); in addition, in 1 Esdras there is a story of three youths who served as bodyguards for King Darius of Persia. The general relationship of content among the various versions is as follows: 1 Esdras Chr-Ezra-Neh (NRSV) (Suppl–2 Esd [NETS]) 1.1–55 2 Chr (2 Suppl) 35.1–36.21 2.1–5 Ezra 1.1–3 // 2 Chr (2 Suppl) 36.22–23 2.6–14 Ezra 1.4–11 2.15–25 4.6–24 3.1–5.6 – 5.7–45 2.1–70 // Neh 7.7–73 (2 Esd 17.7–73) 5.46–70 3.1–4.5 6.1–9.36 5.1–10.44 9.37–55 Neh 7.73–8.12 (2 Esd 17.73–18.12) The relationship of this Greek book to the Hebrew-Aramaic biblical tradition, from a source-critical point of view, is unclear. -
Why 1 Esdras Is Probably Not an Early Version of the Ezra–Nehemiah Tradition
WHY 1 ESDRAS IS PROBABLY NOT AN EARLY VERSION OF THE EZRA–NEHEMIAH TRADITION Juha Pakkala 1. INTRODUCTION In this paper I will analyze and present passages from different parts of 1 Esdras and Ezra–Nehemiah that indicate that the Masoretic Text (MT) generally represents an earlier textual stage than 1 Esdras.1 My perspective is technical in the sense that I will give particular attention to the method and technical aspect of the changes. I will ask how the text may have been changed by later editors. I will try to show that in many cases a reading in 1 Esdras can be seen as an edito- rial change from an older text form that is preserved in the MT. In this respect, this paper also contributes to the discussion about editorial developments in the Second Temple period.2 Comparing the texts on the micro level, I will avoid arguments based on the probable or reconstructed general tendencies of the different versions. My examples will deal with different themes, so that the influence of one theme will not play a decisive role in the discussion. In contrast, in Dieter Böhler’s theory, Jerusalem and its condition is strongly connected to the entire discussion about the relative age of the two versions.3 Rather than thematic considerations, tech- nical observations from the texts should be given priority.4 1. 2 Esdras is a rather literal translation and is relatively close to the Masoretic one. Although there are some significant variants (for example in Neh 9:6), for the purposes of this paper it can be treated as representative of the same textual tradition as the MT. -
Canons of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament
Canons of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament JEWISH TANAKH* PROTESTANT CATHOLIC ORTHODOX OLD TESTAMENT* OLD TESTAMENT* OLD TESTAMENT* Torah (Law or Instruction) The Five Books of Moses Pentateuch Pentateuch Bereshit (In the Beginning) Genesis Genesis Genesis Shemot (Names) Exodus Exodus Exodos VaYiqra (He summoned) Leviticus Leviticus Leuitikon BeMidbar (In the wilderness) Numbers Numbers Arithmoi Devarim (Words) Deuteronomy Deuteronomy Deuteronomion Nevi’im (Prophets) Historical Books Historical Books Histories Iesous Naue Yehoshua (Joshua) Joshua Josue Kritai (Judges) Shofetim (Judges) Judges Judges Routh Shemuel (Samuel) Ruth Ruth 1 Basileion (1 Reigns) Melachim (Kings) 1 Samuel 1 Kings (1 Samuel) 2 Basileion (2 Reigns) 2 Samuel 2 Kings (2 Samuel) 3 Basileion (3 Reigns) Yeshayahu (Isaiah) 1 Kings 3 Kings (1 Kings) 4 Basileion (4 Reigns) Yirmeyahu (Jeremiah) 2 Kings 4 Kings (2 Kings) 1 Paralipomenon (1 Supplements) Yechezkel (Ezekiel) 1 Chronicles 1 Paralipomenon 2 Paralipomenon (2 Supplements) 2 Chronicles 2 Paralipomenon Tere Asar (The Twelve) 1 Esdras (= 3 Esdras in the Ezra 1 Esdras (Ezra) Vulgate; parallels the conclusion Hoshea (Hosea) Nehemiah 2 Esdras (Nehemiah) of 2 Paralipomenon and 2 Esdras) Yoel (Joel) Esther Tobias 2 Esdras (Ezra+Nehemiah) Amos (Amos) Judith Esther (long version) Ovadyah (Obadiah) Poetic and Wisdom Books Esther (long version) Ioudith Yonah (Jonah) 1 Maccabees Job Tobit Michah (Micah) 2 Maccabees Psalms 1 Makkabaion Nachum (Nahum) Proverbs 2 Makkabaion Chavakuk (Habakkuk) Poetic and Wisdom Books Ecclesiastes -
THE KING of the BOOK of ESTHER Personal Bodyguard to Cyrus’ Son, Cambyses II
the Persian army, as well as spear-bearer2 and THE KING OF THE BOOK OF ESTHER personal bodyguard to Cyrus’ son, Cambyses II. The Book of Esther begins with a great feast “in Cambyses had contracted the murder of his the 3rd year of the reign of Ahasuerus” (Esther brother, Smerdis, to secure the throne. Leaving 1:3). Although at one time or another nearly Patizithes in control of the government, he every monarch from Cyaxares (624–586 BC) to embarked on a campaign into Egypt and Artaxerxes III Ochus (358–338 BC) has been succeeded in conquering that empire in the fifth declared as the Medo-Persian ruler in question, year of his reign (525 BC). He then invaded in nearly all theological circles today it is Ethiopia, but the swamps, deserts, etc. frus- conceded almost beyond question that the man trated his attempts for its complete annexation. is Xerxes I of Thermopylae (486-465 BC). This identification was initially offered by Scaliger, (1) Achaemenes the first modern chronologer. (2) Teispes The proofs offered are: (1) a supposed congruity of the character of Ahasuerus with that of Xerxes as portrayed by Herodotus and other (7) Ariaramnes (3) Cyrus I classic writers and (2) a philological conjecture. These will be examined in that which follows, comparing secular data with Scripture. The (8) Arsames (4) Cambyses I secular will not be taken as judge but merely as a witness. If the secular fits, it will be incorpo- rated, but the framework will be based upon the Hystaspis (5) Cyrus II the Great Scriptures which, in context, are the only and final authority on the matter, not the reverse. -
The Third Book of Esdras and the Tridentine Canon
218 THE JOURNAL OF THEOLOGICAL STUDIES THE THIRD BOOK OF ESDRAS AND THE TRIDENTINE CANON. THE question why the Church of Rome does not consider the Third Book of Esdras to be canonical has recently attracted fresh attention. Sir Henry Howorth in the April number in the last volume of this JOURNAL has presented one view of the question. But it is possible that there is another, as I shall endeavour to shew.1 His article was entitled 'The Modern Roman Canon and the Book of Esdras A', and in it he drew certain conclusions adverse to the Fathers of Trent and Florence. Before, however, examin ing his statements and the conclusions at which he arrives, we must be clear as to what is meant by Esdras A. In the LXX MSS Alexandrinus and Vaticanus we find two books entitled respectively Esdras A and Esdras B. The latter, Esdras B, is the Esdras and Nehemias of the Vulgate and Douay versions, the Ezra and Nehemiah of the Authorized and Revised versions. The former, Esdras A, often called the Greek Esdras, is not found in the Douay Bibles, but is the book known as 'Esdrae Tertius Liber ',and printed in the Clementine Vulgate as an appendix, together with ' Esdrae Quartus Liber' and ' Oratio Manassae '. In order to avoid confusion we may give the nomen clature as follows :- Esdras A in the Greek Bibles is III Esdras of the Clementine Vulgate, and is known as the Greek Esdras. Esdras B in the Greek Bibles is the I and II Esdras of the Vulgate, the Ezra and Nehemiah of the English versions. -
Ezra Nehemiah
VOLUME 11 OLD TESTAMENT NEW COLLEGEVILLE THE BIBLE COMMENTARY EZRA NEHEMIAH Thomas M. Bolin SERIES EDITOR Daniel Durken, O.S.B. LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org Nihil Obstat: Reverend Robert C. Harren, J.C.L. Imprimatur: W Most Reverend John F. Kinney, J.C.D., D.D., Bishop of Saint Cloud, Minnesota, December 12, 2011. Design by Ann Blattner. Cover illustration: Square Before the Watergate by Hazel Dolby. Copyright 2010 The Saint John’s Bible, Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, Minnesota USA. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Photos: pages 20, 24, Wikimedia Commons; page 80, Thinkstock.com. Maps on pages 110 and 111 created by Robert Cronan of Lucidity Design, LLC. Scripture texts used in this work are taken from the New American Bible, revised edi- tion © 2010, 1991, 1986, 1970 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Inc., Washington, DC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. © 2012 by Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, Minnesota. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, microfilm, micro fiche, mechanical recording, photocopying, translation, or by any other means, known or yet unknown, for any purpose except brief quotations in reviews, without the previous written permission of Liturgical Press, Saint John’s Abbey, P.O. Box 7500, Collegeville, Minnesota 56321-7500. Printed in the United States of America. 123456789 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bolin, Thomas M. -
The Making of the Bible Part One: the Canon of the Holy Scriptures
Mark E. Larson The Making of the Bible Part One: The Canon of the Holy Scriptures Introduction: Do the 66 Books of the Bible Constitute All the Books God Gave Us? A. The “BIBLE” (i.e. the books) is a collection of books given by inspiration of God over the course of 1,500 years. B. Yet how do we know that the books we have today are the ones that should be in the Bible or that other books from ancient times should not be included? 1. Why were so many ancient books excluded? First & Second Books of Adam and Eve, First & Second Books of Enoch, 1 Esdras, 2 Esdras, Tobit, Judith, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees. The Gospel of Peter, Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit, Gospel of the Twelve, the Gospel of Basilides, the Gospel of Judas, Gospel of Thomas, Epistle of Barnabas, Gospel of Philip, Gospel of Mary Magdalene, Gospel of the Hebrews, the Acts of Paul, the Preaching of Peter. 2. How were the books we have in the Bible chosen in the first place? (Genesis-Revelation) C. Many today claim that we cannot be confident that the Bible is in fact God’s word that the collection of books in it was arbitrarily chosen by men, by assembly counsels, and synods. D. However, there is a way that we can know for sure! 1. The Bible contains God’s plan of salvation! 2. God warns us that no one is to add to His word or take away from it (Deut. 4:2; Rev. -
INTRODUCTION Esdras at a Glance E First Book of Esdras, Also
INTRODUCTION Esdras at a Glance e First Book of Esdras, also known as Esdras, Esdras A, or Greek Ezra, is a text of the Septuagint and Christian Apocrypha. Unfortunately, in several canonical lists and modern versions, various writings go under the name “Esdras.” Bruce M. Metzger (Charlesworth : .) pro- vides a helpful chart of the various works of the Ezraic corpus: Paraphrase of Chronicles chs –; the whole book Old Testament of Ezra; Nehemiah :– Version/ Old Testament book of :; plus a tale about e Ezra Document book of Ezra Nehemiah Darius’s bodyguards Apocalypse Greek Bible* IIEsdras IEsdras (Septuagint) Latin Vulgate IEsdras IIEsdras IIIEsdras IVEsdras Bible Many later Latin IEsdras IIIEsdras IIEsdras = Manuscripts chs –† IVEsdras = chs – VEsdras = chs – Douay English IEsdras IIEsdras IIIEsdras IVEsdras Version (–) Russian Bible, IEsdras Nehemiah IIEsdras IIIEsdras Moscow Patriarchate () Geneva Bible e Book of e Book of IEsdras IIEsdras ‡ () Ezra Nehemiah Bishops’ Bible () King James Version () Revised Standard Version () introduction * In this volume, I shall distinguish Esdras of the Septuagint (= Ezra/Nehemiah) and Esdras of the Latin Apocrypha (= – Ezra) by identifying them as Esdras (LXX) and Esdras (Apoc.) respectively. † Also stratiÞed as Ezra (chs –), Ezra (chs –), and Ezra (chs –) in some modern versions. ‡ Other writings attributed to or named aer Ezra include Greek Apocalypse of Ezra, e Visions of Ezra, Questions of Ezra, Apocalypse of Sedrach, and the Revelation of Ezra, which are available in the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (see introduction in Wright ). Esdras is a Greek recension of the biblical history of the reforms under both Josiah and Ezra and spans a period between the seventh to Þh cen- tury bce. -
Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha Alex Andersen Southeastern University - Lakeland, [email protected]
Southeastern University FireScholars Classical Conversations Spring 2019 Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha Alex Andersen Southeastern University - Lakeland, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://firescholars.seu.edu/ccplus Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Andersen, Alex, "Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha" (2019). Classical Conversations. 3. https://firescholars.seu.edu/ccplus/3 This Term Paper is brought to you for free and open access by FireScholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Conversations by an authorized administrator of FireScholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Southeastern University Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha Alex Andersen English 1233 Professor Grace Veach April 12, 2019 Andersen 1 Abstract For centuries, Protestants have debated with Roman Catholics and Orthodox Christians over the canonicity of the Roman Catholic Apocrypha, a collection of seven books and two additions to books composed from the third century B.C. to the first century A.D. and considered to be canonical by all major non-Protestant Christian denominations. This thesis plunges into this discussion on the Roman Catholic Apocrypha’s canonicity, contending that the Roman Catholic Apocrypha is noncanonical. First, this thesis propounds two broad models for canonicity, the Community Canon Model and the Intrinsic Canon Model, and maintains that the Intrinsic Canon Model is a better model for canonicity than the Community Canon Model. It then explains that many books in the Roman Catholic Apocrypha do not fit the Intrinsic Canon Model’s criteria for canonicity. Next, an argument is made that the Jews had fixed the Hebrew canon during the lifetimes of Jesus and the apostles and that this Hebrew canon excluded the Roman Catholic Apocrypha.