DOCSLIB.ORG

Examining the Use of Ontario Parliamentary Convention to Guide the Conduct of Elected Officials in Ontario

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Examining the Use of Ontario Parliamentary Convention to Guide the Conduct of Elected Officials in Ontario Understanding the Unwritten Rules: Examining the use of Ontario Parliamentary Convention to Guide the Conduct of Elected Officials in Ontario by Ian Stedman A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Faulty of Law University of Toronto © Copyright by Ian Stedman 2015 Understanding the Unwritten Rules: Examining the use of Ontario Parliamentary Convention to Guide the Conduct of Elected Officials in Ontario Ian Stedman Master of Laws Faculty of Law University of Toronto 2015 Abstract Government ethics legislation in Canada guides and restricts the conduct of parliamentarians. Ontario established an independent officer of the legislature in 1988 who is responsible for administering its government ethics legislation. In 1994, an undefined behaviour-guiding standard called “Ontario parliamentary convention” was added to the legislation. This paper explores the history of Ontario’s government ethics regime and examines its response to specific scandals, in order to describe the emergence of Ontario parliamentary convention as a ii standard of conduct. It then provides a full discussion and complementary summary of the specific parliamentary conventions that Ontario’s legislative ethics officers have determined must guide the conduct of Ontario’s parliamentarians. This discussion and summary illuminate the problematic and inconsistent use of this standard by Ontario’s legislative ethics officers. Two sets of recommendations are then offered to help modernize and strengthen the legislation for the benefit of Ontario’s parliamentarians. iii Acknowledgments I am deeply indebted to my wife and children for their support and patience throughout the completion of this thesis. Aimy, Lia and Ivy have spent a great deal of time this past year without their husband and father and this accomplishment is as much theirs as it is mine. I also wish to thank my wife’s parents, Hoa Bui and Minh Lieu, for the endless sacrifices they have made to ensure the continuing growth, strength and stability of our family. I am also grateful for the invaluable guidance and feedback that I received from Andrew Martin. I am fortunate to have found a colleague who was passionate about challenging my ideas and helping me to improve my writing. Your contribution to this project is greatly valued. I also wish to thank my supervisor, Professor Simon Stern. I sincerely appreciate your advice and critical comments on my work. I learned a great deal from you that I will take with me as I move forward in my academic career. Finally, this project would not have happened without the confidence and support of Professor Ian Greene at York University. Your generosity and selflessness towards others epitomizes what it means to be a true professional. I will never be able to thank you enough for your mentorship. iv Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 2 THE HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST RULES IN ONTARIO ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 THE NORTHERN ONTARIO NATURAL GAS COMPANY ............................................. 11 2.2 MUNICIPAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ...................................................................... 12 2.3 PREMIER BILL DAVIS’ 1972 GUIDELINES ................................................................ 16 2.4 PREMIER DAVID PETERSON’S 1985 GUIDELINES ..................................................... 18 2.5 MINISTER ELINOR CAPLAN’S SCANDAL .................................................................. 20 2.6 MINISTER RENÉ FONTAINE’S SCANDAL .................................................................. 22 2.7 THE AIRD REPORT ................................................................................................... 25 2.8 BILL 160 ................................................................................................................. 28 2.9 BILL 23 ................................................................................................................... 30 2.10 MEMBERS’ CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACT, 1988 ......................................................... 31 2.11 PREMIER BOB RAE’S 1990 GUIDELINES .................................................................. 34 2.12 STANDING COMMITTEE REPORT ON PREMIER RAE’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................ 36 2.13 MINISTER EVELYN GIGANTES’ SCANDAL ............................................................... 40 2.14 MEMBERS’ INTEGRITY ACT, 1994 ............................................................................. 42 3 PARLIAMENTARY CONVENTION ..................................................................... 45 3.1 CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS ............................................................................ 47 3.2 THE PATRIATION REFERENCE (1981) ...................................................................... 48 3.3 CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS .......................................................... 51 3.3.1 Powers of the Governor General and Lieutenant Governor .......................... 52 3.3.2 Responsible Cabinet Government ................................................................. 52 3.3.3 Workings of the Legislature .......................................................................... 53 3.3.4 Federalism ..................................................................................................... 54 3.3.5 Judicial Independence ................................................................................... 55 v 3.4 CONFLICT OF INTEREST COMMISSIONER ................................................................. 57 3.5 1991-1992 ANNUAL REPORT .................................................................................. 59 3.6 REFERENCES TO PARLIAMENTARY CONVENTION IN LEGISLATIVE DEBATES PRIOR TO 1991-1992 ............................................................................................... 62 3.7 1992-1993 ANNUAL REPORT .................................................................................. 64 3.8 1993-1994 ANNUAL REPORT .................................................................................. 66 3.9 STANDING COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY .............................................. 67 3.10 LEGISLATIVE DEBATE REGARDING THE PASSING OF THE MEMBERS’ INTEGRITY ACT, 1994 .............................................................................................. 69 3.11 DO THE WORDS “PARLIAMENTARY CONVENTION” HAVE PRIOR MEANING? ......... 71 4 THE EVOLUTION OF “ONTARIO PARLIAMENTARY CONVENTION” ... 73 4.1 COMMISSIONER EVANS ............................................................................................ 75 4.2 COMMISSIONER RUTHERFORD ................................................................................. 83 4.3 (INTERIM) COMMISSIONER EVANS ........................................................................... 85 4.4 COMMISSIONER OSBORNE ........................................................................................ 87 4.5 THE SPEAKER’S JURISDICTION OVER MEMBERS’ CONDUCT .................................. 102 4.6 COMMISSIONER MORRISON ................................................................................... 108 4.7 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 116 5 UNDERSTANDING THE CATEGORIES OF ONTARIO PARLIAMENTARY CONVENTION ............................................................................................................. 118 5.1 PARLIAMENTARY CONVENTIONS GROUNDED IN CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS 119 5.2 CONVENTION BASED ON THE IMPROPER USE OF GOVERNMENT OR LEGISLATIVE RESOURCES, INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL BENEFITS AND STATUTORY RIGHTS AFFORDED TO MEMBERS ........................................................................................ 121 5.3 AN ONTARIO PARLIAMENTARY CONVENTION THAT OUGHT TO BE DISMISSED OUTRIGHT .............................................................................................................. 124 5.4 WHAT IS NOT AN ONTARIO PARLIAMENTARY CONVENTION ................................. 126 6 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................... 128 6.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER .................................... 130 vi 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEGISLATORS ................................................................ 134 6.3 CLARITY AND LEGITIMACY .................................................................................... 135 7 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 137 vii ! 1 Introduction Questions about the ethical conduct of government officials throughout Canada have taken up residence on the front pages of our local and national newspapers. As the public scrutiny of elected officials grows and becomes more accessible,1 it is important that citizens engage in critical and meaningful discussions about the rules that we have put in place to promote ethical conduct and accountability from those individuals. Members of the media and members of the public should be aware of the rules and should be able to challenge those rules when they are deficient. The rules currently in place in Ontario
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wednesday, March 23, 1994
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 043 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, March 23, 1994 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, March 23, 1994 The House met at 2 p.m. anglophone and francophone families in Quebec has narrowed from 8.2 per cent to 1.9 per cent. _______________ The income gap can be closed, Mr. Speaker, but one has to Prayers conclude that federal policies are not a contributing factor. _______________ * * * [English] STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS CREDIT RATING [English] Mr. Jim Gouk (Kootenay West—Revelstoke): Mr. Speaker, BIODIVERSITY yesterday after the announcement of the downgrading of Cana- da’s rating for foreign currency debt, the Minister of Finance Hon. Charles Caccia (Davenport): Mr. Speaker, biodivers- stated it only affected a small portion of our total debt so it was ity means a richness of life as it surrounds us in nature. We must no big deal. preserve biodiversity because it is nature’s protection against catastrophes. The loss of biodiversity has serious implications Now the Bank of Canada has increased its key lending rate for life on earth. which undoubtedly will result in increased borrowing costs for Canadian consumers and businesses. It is also having an impact We have been told that since the beginning of the century 75 on the cost of government borrowing. per cent of crop diversity has been lost. This leaves us vulner- able. For example uniformity in corn crops could have resulted The budget did not address the deficit or debt. Now all in disaster when a severe blight threatened corn crops in the Canadians are starting to pay for this short–sightedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Mon 18 Apr 2005 / Lun 18 Avr 2005
    No. 130A No 130A ISSN 1180-2987 Legislative Assembly Assemblée législative of Ontario de l’Ontario First Session, 38th Parliament Première session, 38e législature Official Report Journal of Debates des débats (Hansard) (Hansard) Monday 18 April 2005 Lundi 18 avril 2005 Speaker Président Honourable Alvin Curling L’honorable Alvin Curling Clerk Greffier Claude L. DesRosiers Claude L. DesRosiers Hansard on the Internet Le Journal des débats sur Internet Hansard and other documents of the Legislative Assembly L’adresse pour faire paraître sur votre ordinateur personnel can be on your personal computer within hours after each le Journal et d’autres documents de l’Assemblée législative sitting. The address is: en quelques heures seulement après la séance est : http://www.ontla.on.ca/ Index inquiries Renseignements sur l’index Reference to a cumulative index of previous issues may be Adressez vos questions portant sur des numéros précédents obtained by calling the Hansard Reporting Service indexing du Journal des débats au personnel de l’index, qui vous staff at 416-325-7410 or 325-3708. fourniront des références aux pages dans l’index cumulatif, en composant le 416-325-7410 ou le 325-3708. Copies of Hansard Exemplaires du Journal Information regarding purchase of copies of Hansard may Pour des exemplaires, veuillez prendre contact avec be obtained from Publications Ontario, Management Board Publications Ontario, Secrétariat du Conseil de gestion, Secretariat, 50 Grosvenor Street, Toronto, Ontario, M7A 50 rue Grosvenor, Toronto (Ontario) M7A 1N8. Par 1N8. Phone 416-326-5310, 326-5311 or toll-free téléphone : 416-326-5310, 326-5311, ou sans frais : 1-800-668-9938.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..196 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 144 Ï NUMBER 025 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 40th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, March 6, 2009 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1393 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, March 6, 2009 The House met at 10 a.m. Some hon. members: Yes. The Speaker: The House has heard the terms of the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? Prayers Some hon. members: Agreed. (Motion agreed to) GOVERNMENT ORDERS Mr. Mark Warawa (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Environment, CPC) moved that Bill C-17, An Act to Ï (1005) recognize Beechwood Cemetery as the national cemetery of Canada, [English] be read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development. NATIONAL CEMETERY OF CANADA ACT He said: Mr. Speaker, I would like to begin by seeking unanimous Hon. Jay Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of consent to share my time. Commons, CPC): Mr. Speaker, momentarily, I will be proposing a motion by unanimous consent to expedite passage through the The Speaker: Does the hon. member have unanimous consent to House of an important new bill, An Act to recognize Beechwood share his time? Cemetery as the national cemetery of Canada. However, before I Some hon. members: Agreed. propose my motion, which has been agreed to in advance by all parties, I would like to take a quick moment to thank my colleagues Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • V119-1985To1986-331.Pdf
    I LyJL^JJLK p <4- Ontario JOURNALS OF THE Legislative Assembly OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO From 4th of June to 18th of June 1985 Both Days Inclusive and from 2nd of July to 12th of July 1985 Both Days Inclusive and from 15th of October to 20th of December 1985 Both Days Inclusive and from 6th of January to 12th of February 1986 Both Days Inclusive IN THE THIRTY-FOURTH AND THIRTY-FIFTH YEAR OF THE REIGN OF OUR SOVEREIGN LADY QUEEN ELIZABETH II BEING THE First Session of the Thirty-Third Parliament of Ontario SESSION 1985-86 VOL. CXIX INDEX Journals of the Legislative Assembly, Ontario 34-35 ELIZABETH II, 1985-86 1st Session Thirty-Third Parliament DJOURNMENT DEBATES: July 9 (two matters), July 11, November 5 (two matters), December 5 (two matters), December 10 (two matters), December 12 (two matters), Decem- ber 19, January 7, 21 , 23, 28. Aexander, Honourable Lincoln: Appointment as Lieutenant Governor remarks on, (Oct. 15), 71. gOARD OF INTERNAL ECONOMY: Order-in-Council re membership of, (June 7, July 5, Oct. 28, Dec. 9), 26. 46. 92, 144. Budget Debate: 1. Motion for approval, (Oct. 24), 87. Carried, (Feb. 12), 232. Amendment moved, (Oct. 25), 90. Lost, (Feb. 12), 231. 2. Dates debated October 24, 25, 28, 29, 31, November 1 , 4, February 12. By-Election: Warrant for issued, (Oct. 15), 71. fiiil iv index 1985-86 1 ABINET OFFICE ESTIMATES: Cabinet Office Programme. Deemed reported and concurred in (Feb. 12), 221. Francophone Affairs Programme see Francophone Affairs. Commission on Redistribution: Debate on the motion for Consideration of Objections to the Report of (July 5, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer of the Year Award Winner, Richard Sarrazin
    JANUARY 2009 • THE PUBLICATION OF THE MÉTIS NATION OF ONTARIO SINCE 1997 MÉTISVOYAGEUR The VOLUNTEER CAMAs OF THE ABORIGINAL YEAR AWARD MUSIC AWARDS KEEPING TRADITION ALIVE SUDBURY’S RICHARD SALUTE OUR BEST OLIVINE BOUSQUET DANCERS TAKE THE SARRAZIN HONOURED PAGE 29 MÉTIS JIG ON THE ROAD • PAGE 16 PAGE 15 NEW LEADERSHIP, NEW ENERGY, NEW DIRECTION: AN HISTORIC DAY front row, left to right: MNO President Gary Lipinski; Ontario Minister of Aboriginal Affairs, the Honourable Brad Duguid and PCMNO Chair France Picotte. back row, left to right: Métis youth Janine Landry, Senator Elmer Ross and Senator Brenda Powley. On November 18th an historic agreement was signed recognizing the unique history and ways of life of Métis communities in Ontario. This framework agreement sets the course for a new, collaborative relationship between the Ontario Government and the Métis Nation of Ontario. More about the signing and the Special Presidents’ Assembly/AGA on pages 3 to 10. A CANOE CHAIR OF LOUIS HEROES WITH NO MÉTIS RIEL DAY COME IN PADDLES STUDIES MÉTIS ACROSS PROVINCE ALL SIZES UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA GATHER TO HONOUR SEVEN YEAR-OLD MÉTIS GRAND RIVER MÉTIS SELECTED TO HOST THE MEMORY OF A DOES HER PART IN FIGHT LOOKING FOR PADDLES CHAIR OF MÉTIS STUDIES GREAT MÉTIS HERO AGAINST CANCER PAGE 25 40025265 PAGE 13 PAGES 18 + 19 PAGE 26 2 MÉTIS VOYAGEUR ∞ January 2009 Métis Community Councils FONDLY REMEMBERED: NEW ARRIVAL LETTERS: THE MÉTIS Praise for a VOYAGEUR Métis Voyageur WINTER 2009, NO.56 contributor editor Hi. I just had to tell you, the arti- Linda Lord cle by Sabrina Stoessinger (See Métis Voyageur, Autumn 2008, design & production page 19, “Practice Makes Perfect”) Marc St.Germain has really moved me, and each time I look a kid-in-care in the contributors face, I now look for more.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Select Committee on Electoral Reform
    Legislative Assemblée Assembly législative of Ontario de l'Ontario SELECT COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM REPORT ON ELECTORAL REFORM 2nd Session, 38th Parliament 54 Elizabeth II Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Ontario. Legislative Assembly. Select Committee on Electoral Reform Report on electoral reform [electronic resource] Issued also in French under title: Rapport de la réforme électorale. Electronic monograph in PDF format. Mode of access: World Wide Web. ISBN 0-7794-9375-3 1. Ontario. Legislative Assembly—Elections. 2. Elections—Ontario. 3. Voting—Ontario. I. Title. JL278 O56 2005 324.6’3’09713 C2005-964015-4 Legislative Assemblée Assembly législative of Ontario de l'Ontario The Honourable Mike Brown, M.P.P., Speaker of the Legislative Assembly. Sir, Your Select Committee on Electoral Reform has the honour to present its Report and commends it to the House. Caroline Di Cocco, M.P.P., Chair. Queen's Park November 2005 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM COMITÉ SPÉCIAL DE LA RÉFORME ÉLECTORALE Room 1405, Whitney Block, Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM MEMBERSHIP LIST CAROLINE DI COCCO Chair NORM MILLER Vice-Chair WAYNE ARTHURS KULDIP S. KULAR RICHARD PATTEN MICHAEL D. PRUE MONIQUE M. SMITH NORMAN STERLING KATHLEEN O. WYNNE Anne Stokes Clerk of the Committee Larry Johnston Research Officer i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Electoral Systems 1 Citizens’ Assembly Terms of Reference 2 Composition of the Assembly 2 Referendum Issues 4 Review of Electoral Reform 5 Future Role 5 List of Recommendations 6 INTRODUCTION 9 Mandate 9 Research Methodology 10 Assessment Criteria 10 Future Role 11 Acknowledgements 11 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Harris Disorder’ and How Women Tried to Cure It
    Advocating for Advocacy: The ‘Harris Disorder’ and how women tried to cure it The following article was originally commissioned by Action Ontarienne contre la violence faite aux femmes as a context piece in training material for transitional support workers. While it outlines the roots of the provincial transitional housing and support program for women who experience violence, the context largely details the struggle to sustain women’s anti-violence advocacy in Ontario under the Harris regime and the impacts of that government’s policy on advocacy work to end violence against women. By Eileen Morrow Political and Economic Context The roots of the Transitional Housing and Support Program began over 15 years ago. At that time, political and economic shifts played an important role in determining how governments approached social programs, including supports for women experiencing violence. Shifts at both the federal and provincial levels affected women’s services and women’s lives. In 1994, the federal government began to consider social policy shifts reflecting neoliberal economic thinking that had been embraced by capitalist powers around the world. Neoliberal economic theory supports smaller government (including cuts to public services), balanced budgets and government debt reduction, tax cuts, less government regulation, privatization of public services, individual responsibility and unfettered business markets. Forces created by neoliberal economics—including the current worldwide economic crisis—still determine how government operates in Canada. A world economic shift may not at first seem connected to a small program for women in Ontario, but it affected the way the Transitional Housing and Support Program began. Federal government shifts By 1995, the Liberal government in Ottawa was ready to act on the neoliberal shift with policy decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT of GROUNDWATER in CANADA the Expert Panel on Groundwater
    THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF GROUNDWATER IN CANADA The Expert Panel on Groundwater Council of Canadian Academies Science Advice in the Public Interest Conseil des académies canadiennes THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF GROUNDWATER IN CANADA Report of the Expert Panel on Groundwater iv The Sustainable Management of Groundwater in Canada THE COUNCIL OF CANADIAN ACADEMIES 180 Elgin Street, Ottawa, ON Canada K2P 2K3 Notice: The project that is the subject of this report was undertaken with the approval of the Board of Governors of the Council of Canadian Academies. Board members are drawn from the RSC: The Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada, the Canadian Academy of Engineering (CAE) and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS), as well as from the general public. The members of the expert panel responsible for the report were selected by the Council for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This report was prepared for the Government of Canada in response to a request from Natural Resources Canada via the Minister of Industry. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors – the Expert Panel on Groundwater. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication The sustainable management of groundwater in Canada [electronic resource] / Expert Panel on Groundwater Issued also in French under title: La gestion durable des eaux souterraines au Canada. Includes bibliographical references. Issued also in print format ISBN 978-1-926558-11-0 1. Groundwater--Canada--Management. 2. Groundwater-- Government policy--Canada. 3. Groundwater ecology--Canada. 4. Water quality management--Canada. I. Council of Canadian Academies.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Accounts of the Province of Ontario for the Year Ended March
    PUBLIC ACCOUNTS, 1995-96 33 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Hon. Noble Villeneuve, Minister Hon. Elmer Buchanan, Minister DETAILS OF EXPENDITURE Voted Salaries and Wages ($81,508,038) jmporary Help Services ($1,043,045): Management Board Secretariat, 947,087; Legislative Assembly, 60,238; Accounts under $50,000—35,720. lyments to Other Ministries ($59,919): Accounts under $50,000—59,919. ;ss: Recoveries from Other Ministries ($365,326): Environment and Energy, 365,326. Employee Benefits ($13,158,626) lyments for: Canada Pension Plan, 1,574,099; Dental Plan, 930,612; Employer Health Tax, 1,632,425; Group Life Insurance, 168,215; Long Term Income Protection, 972,131; Ontario Public Service Employees' Union Pension Fund/Public Service Pension Fund, 1,754,418; Supplementary Health and Hospital Plan, 1,017,613; Unemployment Insurance, 2,873,853. ther Benefits: Attendance Gratuities, 120,204; Death Benefits, 3,195; Early Retirement Incentive, 110,432; Maternity/Parental/Adoption Leave Allowances, 546,162; Severance Pay, 972,478; Miscellaneous Benefits, 40,295. orkers' Compensation Board, 352,958. lyments to Other Ministries ($89,536): Management Board Secretariat, 75,310; Accounts under $50,000— 14,226. Travelling Expenses ($4,064,025) on. Noble Villeneuve, 11,194; Hon. Elmer Buchanan, 592; K. Knox, 6,820; R. Burak, 528; D.K. Alles, 10,977; P.M. Angus, 10,276; D. Beattie, 18,535; D.A. Bierworth, 11,123; J.R. Bird, 13,998; J.L. dishing, 16,451; J.R. Dalrymple, 10,621; P. Dick, 12,242; EJ. Dickson, 17,477; R.E. Forrest, 13,487; R. Fortin, 13,215; JJ.
    [Show full text]
  • Journals of the Legislative Assmbly of the Province of Ontario, 1951, Being the Third and Fourth
    ONTW- JOURNALS OF THE OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO From the 1st of February to 5th of April, 1951 Both Days Inclusive; And from the 24th to the 27th of September, 1951 Both Days Inclusive IN THE FIFTEENTH YEAR OF THE REIGN OF OUR SOVEREIGN LORD KING GEORGE VI BEING THE Third and Fourth Sessions of the Twenty-Third Legislature of Ontario SESSIONS 1951 PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY VOL. LXXXV ' iZ., * \ ., ' ! i "r ','T'^M or r; :. u ONTARIO TORONTO Printed and Published by Baptist Johnston, Printer to the King's Most Excellent Majesty 1951 INDEX Journals of the Legislative Assembly, Ontario 15 George VI, 1951 3rd SESSION TWENTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE FEBRUARY 1st APRIL 5th, 1951 \ CTIVE SERVICE ELECTION ACT, 1951, THE: Bill No. 134, introduced and referred to Select Committee on Election Laws, 194. Reported, 223. 2nd Reading, 247. House in Committee, 250. 3rd Reading, 270. Royal Assent, 274. (15 George VI, cap. 1,) ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE: See Legislative Assembly. ADMINISTRATOR OF THE PROVINCE: Recommends resolutions to the House, 55, 95. See also Lieutenant-Governor. ADOLESCENT SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ACT, THE: Question No. 14 as to issue of home permits and employment certificates under, 10. Answered, 177. ADOPTION ACT, THE: 1. Amendment to, forecast in Speech from Throne, 7. 2. Bill No. 51, to amend, introduced, 14. 2nd Reading, 43. House in Committee, 70. 3rd Reading, 74. Royal Assent, 272. (15 George VI, cap. 2.) AGED, HOMES FOR: See Homes for the Aged; also Homes for the Aged Act. AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE: See Ontario Agricultural College. AGRICULTURAL COMMITTEES ACT, THE: Question No.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Accounts of the Province of Ontario for the Year Ended March
    PUBLIC ACCOUNTS, 1994-95 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Hon. Elmer Buchanan, Minister DETAILS OF EXPENDITURE Voted Salaries and Wages ($87,902,805) Temporary Help Services ($1,329,292): Management Board Secretariat, 1,220,010; Accounts under $50,000—109,282. Less: Recoveries from Other Ministries ($196,635): Environment and Energy, 196,635. Employee Benefits ($13,866,524) Payments for Canada Pension Plan, 1 ,594,486; Dental Plan, 95 1 ,332; Employer Health Tax, 1 ,702,083; Group Life Insurance, 170,970; Long Term Income Protection, 1,028,176; Supplementary Health and Hospital Plan, 1,016,690; Unemployment Insurance, 3,017,224; Unfunded Liability— Public Service Pension Fund, 1,024,574. Other Benefits: Attendance Gratuities, 401,716; Death Benefits, 18,660; Early Retirement Incentive, 467,244; Maternity/Parental/Adoption Leave Allowances, 530,045; Severance Pay, 1,494,057; Miscellaneous Benefits, 51,035. Workers' Compensation Board, 315,097. Payments to Other Ministries ($152,141): Accounts under $50,000—152,141. Less: Recoveries from Other Ministries ($69,006): Accounts under $50,000—69,006. Travelling Expenses ($3,859,979) Hon. Elmer Buchanan, 7,002; P. Klopp, 3,765; R. Burak, 9,912; W.R. Allen, 13,155; D.K. Alles, 16,276; P.M. Angus, 23,969; D. Beattie, 12,681; A. Bierworth, 14,510; J.L. Cushing, 12,125; L.L. Davies, 11,521; P. Dick, 16,999; E.J. Dickson, 11,231; R.C. Donais, 10,703; J.R. Drynan, 10,277; R. Dunlop, 10,662; JJ. Gardner, 43,319; C.L. Goubau, 12,096; N. Harris, 12,593; F.R Hayward, 26,910; M.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous People and Parliament P. 24 Moving Forward Together
    Canadian eview V olume 39, No. 2 Moving Forward Together: Indigenous People and Parliament p. 24 The Mace currently in use in the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan was made in 1906 and used for the first time in March of that year at the opening of the First Session of the First Legislative Assembly. Purchased from Ryrie Bros. Ltd. of Toronto at a cost of $340.00, it is made of heavy gold-plated brass and is about four feet long. The head consists of a Royal Crown with the arches surmounted by a Maltese cross and bears the Royal Coat-of-Arms on the top indicating the Royal Authority. Each side is decorated with a sheaf of wheat, representing the province’s agricultural wealth, a beaver representing Canada and the monogram E.R. VII, representing the sovereign at the time, Edward VII. The shaft and base are ornamented with a shamrock, thistle and rose intertwined. A Latin inscription around the Royal Coat of Arms reads in English, “Edward the Seventh, by the Grace of God of British Isles and Lands beyond the sea which are under British rule, King, Defender of the Faith, Emperor of India”. Monique Lovett Manager of Interparliamentary Relations and Protocol Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan Courtesy of British Columbia Legislative Library Stick Talking BC Legislature, The Canadian Parliamentary Review was founded in 1978 to inform Canadian legislators about activities of the federal, provincial and territorial branches of the Canadian Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and to promote the study of and interest in Canadian parliamentary institutions.
    [Show full text]