Will Euthanasia Be Legalised? COMMENT: DR ROD WATTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand Autumn 2018, ISSUE 72 Will euthanasia be legalised? COMMENT: DR ROD WATTS What is happening with Northern Presbytery? Northern Presbytery was established in The intent of the strategic restructure was 2011 from the union of the Church’s four to place more emphasis on the regions, northernmost presbyteries. and to provide greater opportunities for ministers and elders to work together, Over time, there were a range of issues regionally. The mantra I am using that indicated the establishment of one is: “region-led, Presbytery connected, large presbytery was not fulfilling what supported by the Presbytery office”. was intended, and there were unintended In the first five months a number of consequences. A review was undertaken, steps have been taken, such as revision referred to as a strategic realignment, of the Property and Finance Workgroup resulting in a proposal that was consulted to be more strategic and proactive; upon. A new structure was adopted in establishment of a Conflict Advisory August 2017. Workgroup, with the purpose of adopting The main structural changes included: the best process to address a particular dispute or issue; decision to revise the Youth • The establishment of five regions to Workgroup, with the aim of increasing further the Northern Presbytery’s the voice of youth and enhancing youth mission and ministry. leadership; establishment of a revised • Each region consists of ministers Mission Pathways Fund to provide and elders from each congregation, governance over the distribution of Dr Rod Watts chaplains, retired ministers and other Presbytery development funds; and the associated ministries. establishment of a new Learning and Presbytery, including congregations, Development Workgroup to increase • The Presbytery office was restructured workgroups and leadership. For example, leadership capacity and capability. to establish two new positions the Presbytery Council is similar to a (Executive Officer and Administration To begin to change the focus to regions Board, with the Convenor similar to the Officer); the Youth Coordinator role leading ministry and mission, each region role of Board Chairperson. The Executive was not affected. (with the exception of Northland at this Officer role is similar to a Chief Executive, stage due to complexities with Churches • The full Presbytery is to meet twice with responsibilities of implementation Together in Northland) has established a per year and the Presbytery’s Council and being accountable to the Board Chair strategic plan. This sets the priorities for is to meet four times per year. – in our case to the Council Convenor. each region, collectively to work together. Exploring what and how to apply • The Council consists of ten elected These are underpinned by a Presbytery organisation excellence should enable members (two from each region), strategic plan, which is close to being streamlining Presbytery processes and with voting rights, moderator (casting finalised. Our mission is to extend trust vote only Standing Orders 1.2), and and relationships by ensuring Presbytery systems; maximize results from activity associated members including operations are timely, transparent, fair, undertaken, and engender a desired immediate past or designate and outcome focused. One goal is for culture. I think my main contribution in moderator, Executive Officer; work- congregations to trust and gain benefit serving the Presbytery is to continue to group convenor; Treasurer, other from the Presbytery. explore how the structures, processes and Presbytery and national Church staff systems of high-performing mission- Based on my 21 years as a senior health/ as appropriate. driven organisations can contribute to social sector executive I think that ministry and mission. • Presbytery workgroups at that stage appropriately applying characteristics consisted of: Property and Finance; of a mission–driven, high-performing – Dr Rod Watt is the Executive Officer Mission Fund, and Youth. organisation would considerably assist of Northern Presbytery. 2 AUTUMN 2018 Presbyterian Church of MODERATOR'S MUSINGS Aotearoa New Zealand The Right Rev Richard Dawson contributes a regular column to Spanz. AUTUMN 2018, Issue 72 Who we are Why Presbyterian? Spanz is published quarterly by the Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand, In this day and age of declining interest in Secondly, we are deeply committed to PO Box 9049, Wellington, New Zealand denominational difference, it is perhaps the ministry of lay people and to the full odd to ponder why I have stayed in the development of every person regardless of Presbyterian family of the Christian gender or race. We are ruled largely by lay church, but I think it is a worthwhile people (lay elders). We give these people Editor exercise, especially at a time of year when equal access to our power structures and we Angela Singer we contemplate for a moment what work to involve them at every level of ministry [email protected] investment we shall make in the Church that they wish to be. While this may require Ph 04 381-8284 in the coming year. constant vigilance and we need to keep asking whether we are keeping the spirit of the belief Advertising Let’s begin with the most common fallacy alive, it is still part of our DNA. Jose Reader – that our commitment isn’t in fact to the [email protected] denomination, but to the local expression As a part of this we believe in a very flat Subscriptions of the denomination – to our local church. leadership structure. We do not believe that “big Katrina Graham It simply isn’t the case that we either can or do leaders” no matter how talented they are will be ignore the wider identity of the denomination. [email protected] the salvation of the Church. Rather we believe The heat of the last 25 years of debate in our Ph 04 381-8283 that the character and content of believing Church would not have occurred if all we care people is the fruit of God’s Spirit moving in our ISSN 1175 5202 (print) about is the local expression of our Church. lives – and it is this which will keep us on the ISSN 1179 3473 (online) It is clear that all of us have a real stake in the straight path. Good leaders are wonderful, but as denominational face of the Church. Israel found out to her peril – bad leaders magnify Next issue So why am I still Presbyterian? As a denom- their mistakes and cast a pall over whole nations. Winter 2018 ination we’re an incredibly eclectic Church. Consequently, we believe in limiting this effect. Advertising deadline There are five major things that I value highly We are committed to the word as a living 20 April 2018 in a denominational structure, which I think we document and an open invitation to meet include in the Presbyterian family well. Design with the God of our mothers and fathers. This Tangerine 1 We have a national and international means we commit to studying it in-depth from identity. the standpoint of belief. We do not come to Printing the scriptures sceptically or in a capricious or Service Printers 2 We are deeply committed to the ministry and expression of lay people. ambivalent manner. The word interrogates us – not the other way around. Only in this way can Copyright 3 We believe in a flat leadership structure. The contents of Spanz may not be we be open to the Spirit’s living word today. 4 We are deeply committed to the reproduced without permission of Finally we take the incarnation seriously. historicity and theological integrity of the publisher. Opinions expressed As the core belief of the Christian faith the the biblical scriptures. in Spanz are not necessarily those incarnation holds all things in balance. It of the Presbyterian Church of 5 We take the incarnation seriously. holds the love and judgement of God in one Aotearoa New Zealand. The first value may seem rather insignificant act. It holds the perfection of God and the but given that our reach is always determined imperfection of our sin in one person and it Cover Photograph by our vision it is important to have a sense of holds the finiteness of our life together with iStock scale that is reflective of the reach of the gospel. the infiniteness of God in Christ’s death and God’s love is for the whole world. The Church’s resurrection. vision needs to reflect this and a national The Presbyterian Church has significant structure goes a long way towards doing this. flaws which we should work on, but we also The national structure acts as a very important have some treasures. I hope you, too, might corrective to the narrowing influence of the feel some sense of pride towards our Church local focus which is proper in its context, but because of these things. should always be seen for what it is – a very small slice of God’s world. God Bless you this year. AUTUMN 2018 3 PRESBYTERIANS SPEAK UT ON EUTHANASIA BILL A bill that would give doctors the legal right to end a person’s life is choice and dignity. The debate is about whether the State should making its way through Parliament. condone and facilitate the suicides of some of its citizens. Very few people fully understand the issues involved in taking that In January, death came up close and personal for Rev Wayne Te step, and the risks.” Kaawa, with a call from the hospital. His mother’s stroke meant Helen adds that euthanasia puts doctors in an invidious she would not last the day without life support. position. “Why should physicians be asked to assist with suicide “The whanau had to decide on her behalf what to do,” he says. when that’s not part of their training or their medical ethics? “She was 82 and had already told us she didn’t want her life International experience shows that doctors in countries prolonged, so we didn’t.
Recommended publications
  • Care Alliance Submission to Justice Select Committee FINAL March 6

    Care Alliance Submission to Justice Select Committee FINAL March 6

    Submission of the Care Alliance Charitable Trust to the Justice Select Committee consideration of the End of Life Choice Bill 6 March 2018 Introduction 1. This submission is made on behalf of the Care Alliance Charitable Trust (Care Alliance). 2. The trustees of Care Alliance are John Kleinsman, PhD (Chair), Sinead Donnelly, MD, FRCPI, FRACP, FAChPM (Deputy Chair) and Michael Hallagan (Treasurer). The Secretary is Professor Emeritus Peter Thirkell, PhD, Honorary Fellow ANZMAC. 3. The Care Alliance is a coalition of Groups and individuals that has been workinG toGether since 2012 to nurture better conversations about dyinG in Aotearoa New Zealand. All members share an understandinG that a compassionate and ethical response to sufferinG does not include euthanasia and assisted suicide. 4. OrGanisations that are members include: • ANZSPM Aotearoa (the New Zealand chapter of the Australian & New Zealand Society of Palliative Medicine) • Christian Medical Fellowship • Euthanasia-Free New Zealand • Family First New Zealand • Hospice New Zealand • Lutherans for Life • New Zealand Health Professionals Alliance • Not Dead Yet Aotearoa • Pacific Leaders Forum • Palliative Care Nurses New Zealand • The Nathaniel Centre • The Salvation Army in New Zealand 5. Individuals in the Care Alliance are Quakers, Catholics, Protestants, Buddhists, agnostics and atheists. We never arGue the question of intentionally endinG the lives of patients from a faith perspective because we simply wouldn’t be able to agree what it was. 6. Our focus is on the practical effects of the Bill presently before this Committee, and particularly its impact on the most vulnerable members of our society should it become law. In short, we arGue that the provisions of this Bill are unable to achieve their stated purpose without placinG other people within the community at siGnificant risk, includinG the risk of wronGful death.
  • Print/Download PDF [182KB]

    Print/Download PDF [182KB]

    No 235 House of Representatives Supplementary Order Paper Tuesday, 21 May 2019 End of Life Choice Bill Proposed amendments Louisa Wall, in Committee, to move the following amendments: Clause 1 amended In clause 1 (page 2, line 3) replace “the End of Life Choice Act 2017” with “the Court Consent to Physician Assisted Dying Act 2019”. Clause 3 replaced Replace clause 3 (page 2, line 9 to page 4, line 13) with: 3 Interpretation In this Act, unless the context requires another meaning,— assisted dying, in relation to a person, means— (a) the administration by a medical practitioner of a lethal dose of medication to the person to relieve the person’s suffering by hastening death; or (b) with the support of a medical practitioner, the self-adminis- tration by the person of a lethal dose of medication to relieve their suffering by hastening death. medical practitioner means a health practitioner who— (a) is, or is deemed to be, registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand continued by section 114(1)(a) of the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 as a practi- tioner of the profession of medicine; and (b) holds a current practising certificate 1 Proposed amendments to SOP No 235 End of Life Choice Bill minister means the Minister of the Crown who is responsible for the administration of this Act— (a) under the authority of a warrant; or (b) under the authority of the Prime Minister ministry means the Ministry of Justice palliative care means health services delivered to a person with a terminal illness that aims to optimise
  • Law and Life

    Law and Life

    Law and Life The Lecretia Seales Memorial Lecture Delivered at the New Zealand Parliament 29 August 2016 by Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Palmer QC* ___________________________ * Barrister, Distinguished Fellow, Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law and Centre for Public Law, Global Affiliated Professor, University of Iowa. I am grateful to Professor Bill Atkin, Andrew Butler, Catherine Marks, Professor R S Clark and Dr Warren Young for comments on a draft of this lecture and to Scarlet Roberts for research assistance. None of them is responsible for its content. 2 Lecretia’s Plight Lecretia Seales died of a cancerous brain tumour in Wellington on 3 June 2015. She was 42. Employed by the Law Commission as a senior legal and policy adviser for eight years, Lecretia had an abiding interest and competence in the field of law reform. She lived in Karori with her devoted husband Matt Vickers and their Abyssinian cat Ferdinand. I feel privileged to have known Lecretia well, both when I was President of the Law Commission and earlier when she worked with me at the law firm Chen, Palmer and Partners, public law specialists. Lecretia was a lawyer of high quality and she had a passion for the law. She hailed from Tauranga where her parents Shirley and Larry still live. She loved cooking and dancing. She had the gifts of friendship and empathy. I have met few people as determined and strong as she was. In the case she brought in the High Court concerning her impending death one witness described her personality as “young, bright, independent, perfectionist.” I concur.
  • For Personal Stories See

    For Personal Stories See

    1 EDITORIAL - PHONY WAR HEADS INTO LAST BATTLE We are in what David Seymour calls the “phony war” as Parliament’s Justice Committee ploughs through 37,000 submissions on his End of Life Choice Bill and most MPs focus on other things, knowing they do not have to vote on it for at least six more months. If you look at the submissions as they are posted on Parliament’s website, it has reluctantly to be said it appears to be a war that at this stage we are not winning. For as we know, our opponents have divine motivation to fight enlightened legislation that would give the terminally sick the option of relief from their suffering. Encouraged by a barrage of lies and misinformation fed them weekly from the pulpit they are flooding the committee with a litany of ignorant claims about the measure. It does not matter that they are often illiterate – and rarely show any sign that the writers have actually read the bill – they believe the committee can be persuaded that it is a numbers game. “They will say anything and stop at nothing to create fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) over the bill,” Seymour said in a message for this Newsletter. And he warned that the weight of the opposition’s campaign will test the resolve of MPs who may decide it is all just too difficult. “That’s why it is essential that EoLC members maintain a counterweight to the intense lobbying that is going on from the FUD campaign,” Seymour said. Noting that every reliable and scientific opinion poll on the issue shows an overwhelming majority of voters want medically-assisted dying to be legalised, he said: “MPs need to be reminded that for every shrill anti, there are five people who think it is time for change and choice.
  • Insight Article Print Format

    Insight Article Print Format

    Legal update - The right to die in New Zealand - Seales v Attorney General Alastair Hercus, Peter Chemis, Hamish Kynaston, Alastair Sherriff, Natasha Wilson, Catherine Miller 21 August 2015 Introduction The recent High Court case of Seales v Attorney-General has generated much discussion about the law on assisted dying in New Zealand. This update sets out a brief overview of the relevant law and discusses the Seales v Attorney-General case, including what the case might mean for the future. A brief overview of the law The act of suicide is not a crime in New Zealand. However, certain provisions of the Crimes Act address suicide and assisted dying. Key amongst these is section 179, which provides: Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years who: a) incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit suicide, if that person commits or attempts to commit suicide in consequence thereof; or b) aids or abets any person in the commission of suicide. The law of homicide is also relevant, as a deliberate act to assist a person's death will likely amount to culpable homicide (section 160). Importantly, section 63 also states that no one has a right to consent to their death and section 164 provides that someone may be criminally responsible for another's death even if their conduct served only to hasten that death. In the particular context of assisted dying, the "doctrine of double effect" is also relevant. That doctrine is yet to be fully tested in the New Zealand courts but in the English case of Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 (HL), Lord Goff described the principle as: .
  • February 2018 END-OF-LIFE CHOICE SOCIETY of NEW ZEALAND INC Issue 49 Member of the World Federation of Right to Die Societies

    February 2018 END-OF-LIFE CHOICE SOCIETY of NEW ZEALAND INC Issue 49 Member of the World Federation of Right to Die Societies

    February 2018 END-OF-LIFE CHOICE SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INC Issue 49 Member of the World Federation of Right to Die Societies EDITORIAL - 2018 IS MAKE OR BREAK YEAR We have entered a critical new year for the cause we conservatives - are in a minority but they are bent on have been fighting four decades so far. fighting a campaign blatantly built on lies and Whether it will prove to be a happy one remains misinformation to stop us and overseas experience to be seen. shows they are funded by wealthy church coffers. For while we made history in December when We expect a better deal from Parliament's Parliament voted for the first time to allow an assisted Justice Select Committee than we received from the dying Bill to progress beyond the first stage, we can biased group that last considered the issue, but we have no doubts about the struggle ahead to win the have only until February 20 to make formal ultimate human right of the 21st century. submissions and we need all our members to make It has never been more important for every their voices heard. member of our society to do whatever they can to The committee then has until mid-September promote the right to die with dignity and persuade our to make its recommendations to Parliament before all politicians to go on and pass an enlightened law. MPs vote again on whether New Zealand will join 110 This is a make or break year. It has been 15 million Americans and millions more in Canada, years since Parliament last tackled the issue and if we Europe, South America and Australia with the right to miss out on this opportunity there will be another long allow our terminally ill who are suffering intolerably to gap before it faces it again.
  • Lecretia Seales 1973 - 2015 Rip

    Lecretia Seales 1973 - 2015 Rip

    12 July 2015 VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INC Issue 40 LECRETIA SEALES 1973 - 2015 RIP Rod Emmerson’s cartoon appeared in the NZ Herald on June 6, the day after Lecretia Seales died. I sent a message on behalf of VESNZ complimenting him on it, saying: “You touched the hearts of hundreds if not thousands with this poignant drawing”, and requested his permission to reprint it in this Newsletter. Emmerson replied: “There has been an enormous - positive - response to this cartoon” and sent a high-resolution copy to reproduce at no charge. We thank him. David Barber, Editor. WILL LAW CHANGE BE HER LEGACY? Lecretia Seales died at the age of 42 just over into the issue of medically assisted dying. four years after her inoperable brain tumour While she failed in a bid to persuade was diagnosed. Her tragic case moved the a High Court judge to let her doctor help nation, undoubtedly helping VESNZ gather her die without fear of prosecution, she 8975 signatures on an historic petition and she managed to work until taking sick leave in leaves a powerful legacy in the shape of the March and did not resign her job until New Zealand Parliament’s first public inquiry Continued on Page 2 End-of-Life Choice Newsletter - for personal stories see www.ves.org.nz/ourstories 43 May 20, being spared the pain and indignity of at their first reading, meaning they were a long period of unendurable suffering. “In the denied committee hearings that would have end, Lecretia was fortunate that her death attracted public submissions.
  • Voluntary Euthanasia and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act a Critical Analysis of the Seales V Attorney-General Decision

    Voluntary Euthanasia and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act a Critical Analysis of the Seales V Attorney-General Decision

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington CAMERON LAING Voluntary Euthanasia and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act A Critical Analysis of the Seales v Attorney-General Decision LAWS522: PUBLIC LAW Submitted for the LLB (Honours) Degree Faculty of Law Victoria University of Wellington 2015 2 Abstract: The recent decision of Seales v Attorney-General clarified the law surrounding voluntary euthanasia in New Zealand. In addition to seeking declaratory judgment from the High Court as to the proper interpretation of certain provisions of the Crimes Act 1961, Lecretia Seales sought two declarations regarding sections 8 and 9 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Specifically, that insofar as certain provisions of the Crimes Act restrict a person with a terminal and incurable illness from seeking life- ending medical assistance, the Crimes Act is inconsistent with a person’s rights not to be deprived of life and not to be subjected to torture or cruel treatment. This paper critiques Justice Collins’ conclusions that sections 8 and 9 of the Bill of Rights Act were not breached in Ms Seales’ tragic circumstances. Further, it argues that sections 8 and 9 of the Bill of Rights Act should extend to circumstances where people are suffering from terminal and incurable illnesses and recognise a right to seek life-ending medical assistance. Finally, the paper critiques the methodology used by the courts in New Zealand when assessing whether rights-infringing legislation is justified pursuant to section 5 of the Bill of Rights Act, and ultimately concludes that the courts should always query whether rights-infringing legislation serves a purpose sufficiently important to justify infringement of human rights.
  • Critical Year Starts with Personal Attacks From

    Critical Year Starts with Personal Attacks From

    12 February 2016 VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INC Issue 42 CRITICAL YEAR STARTS WITH PERSONAL ATTACKS FROM RATTLED OPPONENTS by David Barber, Editor What promises to be a critical year for the campaign outrageous eXample of a red herring”; Jansen linked to achieve the end-of-life choice law change that at Matt and VESNZ with a proposal by euthanasia least three-quarters of New Zealanders want began campaigners in the Netherlands to allow all elderly with signs that our opponents are increasingly people access to a death pill, regardless of their nervous about the prospect of us succeeding. medical condition. As the February 1 deadline for submissions to Assuming Matt’s attendance at the Parliament’s first public inquiry into the issue neared, Euthanasia 2016 international conference in they stepped up their usual litany of lies and Amsterdam in May - although Matt had not made up misinformation and moved into personal attacks. his mind whether to attend an invitation to speak Top of their hate list was Lecretia Seales, the gutsy there - showed "what a slippery slope the so-called brain cancer victim who last year disappointingly right to die really is", Jansen said. failed to persuade a High Court judge to let her The “slippery slope” is a scare tactic phrase doctor end her suffering with a planned and peaceful opponents regularly use in the absence of reason to death. frighten people who have not made up their minds Opponents of physician-assisted dying were about physician-assisted dying. incensed when the New Zealand Herald, the Matt rightly said it was "simply fallacious" to country’s largest newspaper, named Lecretia their assume his presence at the conference would be an New Zealander of the Year for 2015, saying: “She automatic endorsement of the views of organisers or was brave and inspiring, sharing something as others attending.
  • SEALES V ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2015] NZHC 1239 [4 June 2015]

    SEALES V ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2015] NZHC 1239 [4 June 2015]

    ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THIS JUDGMENT UNTIL 3.00PM ON 5 JUNE 2015. IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV-2015-485-000235 [2015] NZHC 1239 UNDER The Declaratory Judgments Act 1908 and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 BETWEEN LECRETIA SEALES Plaintiff AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL Defendant Hearing: 25-27 May 2015 Counsel: A S Butler with C J Curran, C M Marks, M L Campbell and E J Watt for Plaintiff Mr M Heron QC, Solicitor-General with P T Rishworth QC, E J Devine and Y Moinfar for Defendant M S R Palmer QC and J S Hancock for Human Rights Commission V E Casey and M S Smith for Care Alliance K G Davenport QC with A H Brown and L M K E Almoayed for Voluntary Euthanasia Society of New Zealand (Incorporated) Judgment: 4 June 2015 JUDGMENT OF COLLINS J Summary of judgment [1] Ms Seales is dying from a brain tumour.1 She is 42 years old and may have only a short time to live.2 1 The names of Ms Seales’ principal oncologist, another oncologist who has treated her and her doctor have been suppressed. Affidavit of Ms Seales’ principal oncologist, 2 April 2015 at [7]- [8]; Ms Seales’ principal oncologist has explained Ms Seales has “diffuse astrocytoma ... with elements of an oligodendroglioma. This combination is often abbreviated to ‘oligoastrocytoma’. Both astrocytoma … and oligodendroglioma … grow diffusely and infiltrate the brain”. 2 Second affidavit of Ms Seales’ principal oncologist, 22 May 2015 at [6]; Ms Seales can now SEALES v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2015] NZHC 1239 [4 June 2015] [2] Ms Seales wants to have the option of determining when she dies.
  • SEALES V ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2015] NZHC 1239 [4 June 2015]

    SEALES V ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2015] NZHC 1239 [4 June 2015]

    ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THIS JUDGMENT UNTIL 3.00PM ON 5 JUNE 2015. IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV-2015-485-000235 [2015] NZHC 1239 UNDER The Declaratory Judgments Act 1908 and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 BETWEEN LECRETIA SEALES Plaintiff AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL Defendant Hearing: 25-27 May 2015 Counsel: A S Butler with C J Curran, C M Marks, M L Campbell and E J Watt for Plaintiff Mr M Heron QC, Solicitor-General with P T Rishworth QC, E J Devine and Y Moinfar for Defendant M S R Palmer QC and J S Hancock for Human Rights Commission V E Casey and M S Smith for Care Alliance K G Davenport QC with A H Brown and L M K E Almoayed for Voluntary Euthanasia Society of New Zealand (Incorporated) Judgment: 4 June 2015 JUDGMENT OF COLLINS J Summary of judgment [1] Ms Seales is dying from a brain tumour.1 She is 42 years old and may have only a short time to live.2 1 The names of Ms Seales’ principal oncologist, another oncologist who has treated her and her doctor have been suppressed. Affidavit of Ms Seales’ principal oncologist, 2 April 2015 at [7]- [8]; Ms Seales’ principal oncologist has explained Ms Seales has “diffuse astrocytoma ... with elements of an oligodendroglioma. This combination is often abbreviated to ‘oligoastrocytoma’. Both astrocytoma … and oligodendroglioma … grow diffusely and infiltrate the brain”. 2 Second affidavit of Ms Seales’ principal oncologist, 22 May 2015 at [6]; Ms Seales can now SEALES v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2015] NZHC 1239 [4 June 2015] [2] Ms Seales wants to have the option of determining when she dies.
  • (Sops) That Were Proposed to Amend the End of Life Choice Bill

    (Sops) That Were Proposed to Amend the End of Life Choice Bill

    This document contains all the Supplementary Order Papers (SOPs) that were proposed to amend the End of Life Choice Bill. Key: • Plain black text: The version that came back from the Justice Committee • Black text underlined or struck through: Changes made by SOP 259 (David Seymour) – all approved by Parliament • Red text: Changes made by SOPs 287 and 361 (Referendum clauses by Jenny Marcroft) – all approved by Parliament • Blue text: Changes proposed by other SOPs - all rejected by Parliament Proposed amendments to End of Life Choice Bill SOP No 259 Explanatory note This Supplementary Order Paper sets out amendments to the End of Life Choice Bill. The following substantive amendments are made to the Bill: • a purpose clause is inserted (new clause 2A): • definitions of approved form, attending nurse practitioner, conscientious objec- tion, medication, and nurse practitioner are inserted (clause 3): • the definition of independent medical practitioner is amended to require the medical practitioner to have held a practising certificate for at least the previ- ous 5 years, to ensure that an experienced medical practitioner gives the second opinion as to whether a person is eligible for assisted dying (clause 3): • the definition of person who is eligible for assisted dying is amended so that a person who has a grievous and irremediable medical condition that is not a ter- minal illness likely to end the person’s life within 6 months will not be eligible for assisted dying (clause 4(1)(c) replaced): • the competence of a person who wishes