DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Supplementary Planning Document I October 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Supplementary Planning Document I October 2016 HAMPTON WICK AND TEDDINGTON Draft Supplementary Planning Document I October 2016 Contents 1. Introduction 8. Features and Materials 2. Planning Policy and Wider Context 9. Guidance for Development Sites 3. Spatial Context 10. Shop Front Guidance 4. Vision for Hampton Wick 11. Forecourt Parking 5. Vision for Teddington 12. Flood Risk 6. Objectives 7. Character Area Assessments Appendix 1: Relevant Policies and Guidance Character Area 1: Stanley Road north Character Area 2: Cambridge Road and surrounds Character Area 3: The Grove Conservation Area Character Area 4: Teddington Lock Conservation Area Character Area 5: High Street (Teddington) Conservation Area Character Area 6: Udney Park Road and surrounds Character Area 7: Blackmore’s Grove Conservation Area Character Area 8: Broom Road and Kingston Road Character Area 9: Broom Water Conservation Area Character Area10: Teddington School, Fairways and Glamorgan Road Character Area 11: Hampton Wick Conservation Area Character Area 12: Normansfield Conservation Area Character Area 13: Sandy Lane and surrounds Character Area 14: Park Road (Teddington) Conservation Area Character Area 15: Broad Street and Queen’s Road Character Area 16: Hampton Road Character Area 17: Mays Road Conservation Area 1. Introduction The purpose of this Village Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning The London Borough of Richmond Document (SPD) is primarily to upon Thames has been divided into establish a vision and planning policy a series of smaller village areas. aims for the area, in light of existing and Each village is distinctive in terms of emerging Local Plan policy. The SPD the community, facilities and local character – as are many sub areas intends to define, maintain and enhance within the villages. the character of Hampton Wick and Teddington and to provide guidance in The villages of the London Borough this regard. The SPD forms part of the Richmond upon Thames are wider Village Plans for Hampton Wick and attractive with many listed buildings Teddington. and Conservation Areas, the local character of each being unique, By identifying key features of the village, recognisable and important to the the SPD clarifies the most important community and to the aesthetic of aspects and features that contribute to the borough as a whole. local character to guide those seeking to make changes to their properties or to develop new properties in the area, as well as being a material consideration in determining planning applications. The core of this SPD is a series of character area assessments for the component areas of Hampton Wick and Teddington. These character areas have been identified through the similarity of key features that are deemed to define their Hampton Wick and Teddington SPD Area Boundary individual local character. The assessments establish dominant features and materials as well as an overall description of the street pattern and housing types. 4 The boundary for the SPD is based on: Wider Context (Village Plans) ■ a review of how each area’s design Village Plans have been developed for each characteristics can best be grouped; of Richmond’s 14 villages. Each Village Plan ■ taking account of physical and describes a vision for the village area and administrative boundaries, including identifies what the Council will do and Conservation Area boundaries to avoid what local people can do to achieve the these being split between village areas; vision together. It sets out the key issues and and priorities and provides background ■ how local communities viewed their local information on the village area. The Village areas when asked through the Council’s Plans are maintained on the Council’s 2010 ‘All-In-One’ survey and subsequent website and are updated as projects are consultations. progressed. They cover a wide range of topics, including matters not within the This SPD has been produced by the Council remit of the SPD. working closely with the community. This has ensured that local residents, businesses This Village Planning Guidance SPD forms and stakeholders have been genuinely part of the Village Plan by providing a formal involved in defining the important features planning policy document for Hampton – as well as the opportunities and threats – Wick and Teddington which can be used to that define their local area. guide new development that has responded The community has been involved through: to residents’ desire to have greater control and influence over planning and ■ ‘Drop in sessions’ held at Elleray Hall development decisions in their local area. on the 21st May 2016 and at St John’s The involvement of the local community Hampton Wick Warehouse on the 11th in the production of the SPD has been June essential in ensuring it is a genuine reflection of residents’ priorities. ■ Resident walkabouts held on the 22nd May and 19th June ■ Online questionnaire consultation (from 20th May to 27th June 2016) 5 2. Planning Policy and Wider Context 2.1 Planning Policy Framework must designate a Thames Policy Area in consultation on the first draft of the their Development Plan Documents. The Local Plan took place from 8 July 2016 National Planning Policy boroughs must define the boundaries until 19 August 2016. In line with national The National Planning Policy Framework by taking into account proximity to the policy and guidance, the emerging Local (NPPF) sets out the Government’s Thames, contiguous areas with clear Plan will be given weight in the decision planning policies for England and how visual links between areas and buildings making process according to its stage of these are expected to be applied. The and the river and specific geographical preparation (i.e. the more advanced the NPPF is a key part of the Government’s features, areas and buildings which relate preparation, the greater the weight that reforms to make the planning system or link to the Thames. The River Thames may be given). less complex and more accessible. The section of Hampton Wick and Teddington It is anticipated that the Local Plan will NPPF provides the context for local is designated in the Thames Policy Area reach the ‘Publication’ stage in late 2016, planning authorities and decision takers, in the London Plan. at which point it is anticipated that the both when drawing up plans and making Local Planning Policy policies and site allocations within the decisions about planning applications. Local Plan will be adopted for use in It must be taken into account in the The London Borough of Richmond upon determining planning applications and preparation of local and neighbourhood Thames current statutory planning policy development management purposes. plans, and is a material consideration in framework is set out in adopted Plans planning decisions. including the Core Strategy, adopted Once the Local Plan is adopted, which is in April 2009, and the Development anticipated to take place in spring 2018, Regional Planning Policy Management Plan, adopted in November it will supersede all the existing policies At a regional level, the London Plan is 2011. There is an online proposals in the Core Strategy and Development the overall strategic plan for London map and a range of guidance provided Management Plan. setting out an integrated economic, through Supplementary Planning Alongside adopted planning policies, environmental, transport and social Documents (SPDs) and Supplementary suitable references have been made framework for the development of Planning Guidance (SPG) for the area. to the equivalent policies in the Pre- London over the next 20-25 years. This This SPD forms part of the planning publication Local Plan. document has been adopted to ensure policy framework and should be read that a longer-term view of London’s in conjunction with the Council’s Up-to-date information on the Council’s development is taken when producing suite of planning policy and guidance Local Plan can be viewed at http:// local plans, making planning decisions and as applicable. There is also a range of www.richmond. gov.uk/home/services/ investing in infrastructure. evidence base studies that the Council planning/planning_ policy/local_plan.htm. has undertaken which help to guide Policy 7.29 in the London Plan refers policy making. to the Thames Policy Area stating that relevant boroughs, including Richmond, The Council is now progressing the Local Plan Review. The public 6 2.2 Key Planning Policies Within the Pre-publication Local Plan, the CS Policy CP11 River Thames Corridor Within the Pre-publication Local Plan the equivalent policy is Policy LP 1. equivalent policy is Policy LP 3. SPDs cannot create new policies but The natural and built environment and expand on policies set out in higher plans, CS Policy CP7 Maintaining and Improving the the unique historic landscape of the River DMP Policy DM HD 2 Conservation of Listed notably the adopted Core Strategy (CS), Local Environment Thames corridor within the Borough will be Buildings and Scheduled Ancient Monuments Development Management Plan (DMP) and protected and enhanced. All new development should recognise Preservation of Listed Buildings of special Local Plan (LP), currently at pre-publication distinctive local character and contribute to Within the Pre-publication Local Plan the architectural or historic interest and Ancient stage. creating places of a high architectural and equivalent policy is Policy LP 18. Monuments and seek to ensure that they Whilst all adopted policies are applicable, urban design quality that are well used and are kept in a good state of repair. CS Policy CP13 Opportunities for All those of particular relevance are: valued. Proposals will have to illustrate that Within the Pre-publication Local Plan the they: The Council will work with all relevant DMP Policy DM DC 1 Design Quality equivalent policy is Policy LP 3. agencies to reduce disadvantage, particularly (i) are based on an analysis and New development must be of a high in the most deprived areas of the Borough DMP Policy DM HD 3 Buildings of Townscape understanding of the Borough’s architectural and urban design quality and for disadvantaged individuals, and ensure Merit development patterns, features and based on sustainable design principles.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HAMPTON WICK the Thames Landscape Strategy Review 2 2 7
    REACH 05 HAMPTON WICK The Thames Landscape Strategy Review 2 2 7 Landscape Character Reach No. 5 HAMPTON WICK 4.05.1 Overview 1994-2012 • Part redevelopment of the former Power Station site - refl ecting the pattern of the Kingston and Teddington reaches, where blocks of 5 storeys have been introduced into the river landscape. • A re-built Teddington School • Redevelopment of the former British Aerospace site next to the towpath, where the river end of the site is now a sports complex and community centre (The Hawker Centre). • Felling of a row of poplar trees on the former power station site adjacent to Canbury Gardens caused much controversy. • TLS funding bid to the Heritage Lottery Fund for enhancements to Canbury Gardens • Landscaping around Half Mile Tree has much improved the entrance to Kingston. • Construction of an upper path for cyclists and walkers between Teddington and Half Mile Tree • New visitor moorings as part of the Teddington Gateway project have enlivened the towpath route • Illegal moorings are increasingly a problem between Half Mile Tree and Teddington. • Half Mile Tree Enhancements 2007 • Timber-yards and boat-yards in Hampton Wick, the Power Station and British Aerospace in Kingston have disappeared and the riverside is more densely built up. LANDSCAPE CHARACTER 4.05.2 The Hampton Wick Reach curves from Kingston Railway Bridge to Teddington Lock. The reach is characterised by residential areas interspersed with recreation grounds. Yet despite tall apartment blocks at various locations on both banks dating from the last 30 years of the 20th century, the reach remains remarkably green and well-treed.
    [Show full text]
  • Downstream Workshop Word for Word Report
    Process sponsored by: Process facilitated by: River Thames Scheme Walton Bridge to Richmond (downstream of the proposed flood channel) Workshop Word for Word Report November 17th 2016 Dialogue Matters Ltd, Registered in England and Wales 7221733 Professional workshop facilitators: Lucy Armitage Dialogue Matters Ltd. Joel Pound Dialogue Matters Ltd. Laurence Tricker Dialogue Matters Ltd. Volunteer small group facilitators: Gemma Carey GBV Andrew Todd GBV Vicky Lutyens GBV Kerry Quinton GBV Jenny Marshall-Evans GBV Ed Ferguson GBV Colette Walmsley Environment Agency Laura Littleton Environment Agency Leanne McKrill Environment Agency Liz Etheridge Environment Agency Laura Littleton Environment Agency Leanne McKrill Environment Agency Typed by: Gemma Carey GBV Andrew Todd GBV Jenny Marshall-Evans GBV Sorted by: Gemma Carey GBV Lucy Armitage Dialogue Matters Ltd. Checked and sign off Dialogue Matters Ltd. 1 Dialogue Matters Ltd, Registered in England and Wales 7221733 Contents 1 About the workshop and this report 3 2 Vision Question 4 2.1 Its 2030 and you are chatting with people about how much better things are now if a flood happens. Why what pleases you most? 4 3 Question & Answers session following presentation 6 4 Sharing Knowledge 8 4.1 Consider the weir options 8 4.2 Information 9 4.3 Local Flooding - Tell us your ‘on the ground’ knowledge 10 4.4 Mapping communities 20 4.5 Flood Storage on the Ham Lands 21 5 Session 2: Community Resilience Measures 23 5.1 What information would your community/interest group like to know as we approach this work? 23 5.2 What types of information will your community/interest group be able to provide to help us progress and develop this work? 26 5.3 What do we need to factor in when considering the location defence options (permanent, temporary and PLP).
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the Chair Contents
    LETTER FROM THE CHAIR May I welcome you to your Summer Tidings as the 12th Chairman of the Society? A big thank you to everyone at the AGM who voted me into the chair and voted for the talented Alan Benns to be our 10th Vice Chairman. You can read more about Alan inside and our two newest group leaders: James Sinclair and Andy Weston. We have a busy time ahead with Teddington in Flower, The Village Fair and Pram Race and the River Festival. We hope most of you will take part either by attending the events or helping us run our stall. We have a new venture at the Park Hotel and that's Afternoon Cream Teas. Bring your friends along and try it out for the first time on June 3rd or come alone and make new friends. The council have taken it upon themselves to put free hanging baskets in each village to complement the Rugby World Cup. Baskets will be planted in World Cup colours - blue, pink and white. We will get 50 placed in the High Street, Broad Street, Victoria Road and Station Road from May-October. We will get 16 baskets in the winter. The Landmark Arts Centre is celebrating its 20th anniversary in November by installing 5 decorative panels telling the history of the building. The Society has donated £500 towards the £2,000 needed for the task. The vinyl panels put up by LBRuT to conceal the derelict Bottoms Up site in the Causeway have been removed as the site is being refurbished at long last.
    [Show full text]
  • Twickenham Tribune 0104.Pdf
    Est 2016 Borough of Twickenham 0104 The Twickenham Tribune Contents TwickerSeal TwickerTape History Through Postcards Arts and Entertainment Children are Pedestrians Too St Mary’s University update 5th November Fire Advice A Busy Week in Church Street Teddington Lights River Crane Sanctuary Christmas WW1 Steam, Steel and Shells A Traveller’s Tales Twickers Foodie Competitions Jordan – the Desert Kingdom Letters – 20 mph Mark Aspen Reviews Football Focus Bus Route Changes Turing House School Contributors TwickerSeal Alan Winter Erica White St Mary’s University Shona Lyons Friends of Udney Park Sammi Macqueen Jeremy Hamilton-Miller Helen Baker Doug Goodman London Fire Brigade TwickerGrump Alison Jee Bruce Lyons Mark Aspen Rugby Football Union Transport for London EDITORS Berkley Driscoll Teresa Read Contact [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Twickenham Annual Draw-off at Dusk Published by: Twickenham Alive Limited (in association with Photo by Berkley Driscoll World InfoZone Limited) Registered in England & Wales Reg No 10549345 The Twickenham Tribune is registered with the ICO under the Data Protection Act, Reg No ZA224725 The annual ‘draw-off’ has started, which means “In order to carry out essential maintenance works on Richmond lock, weirs and sluices, it will be necessary to lift the weirs at Richmond for a period of 3 weeks. This will allow the river between Richmond Lock and Teddington Lock to drain down at low water on each tide.” In simple terms, low tide is very low! This will continue until 18th November. For river users it is a time to take extra care, while for others it is a chance to don wellies and dabble in a bit of mudlarking.
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 Appendices
    APPENDICES Footnotes I Chronology of Evolving Architecture/Design II List of Consultees III Principal Issues Raised by Consultations IV Principal Contacts V Summary List of Strategic Policies VI List of Illustrations VII APPENDIX I: FOOTNOTES 1 London Planning Advisory Committee : 1993 Draft Advice on Strategic Planning Guidance for London (para. 8.14) 2 Royal Fine Art Commission: Thames Connections Exhibition (May 1991) 3 Judy Hillman: A New Look for London (Royal Fine Art Commission 1988) ISBN 0 11 752135 3 4 Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Landscape Strategy for the Thames between Hampton Court and Kew: Elements for the Project Brief (July 1992) Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Report on Consultation (July 1992) 5 Sherban Cantacuzino Eddington Charitable Trust Johnny Van Haeften Mick Jagger Richard Lester Prince and Princess Rupert Loewenstein 6 David Lowenthal: The Historic Landscape Reconsidered (George Washington Univ. 1990) 7 English Nature: Strategy for the 1990s: Natural Areas (1993) 8 Richmond Council demolition of Devonshire Lodge at the foot of Richmond Hill in 1960s 9 Countryside Commission, English Heritage, English Nature: Conservation Issues in Strategic Plans (August 1993) ISBN 0 86170 383 9 10 Greater London Council, Department of Transportation and Development: Thames-side Guidelines, An Environmental Handbook for London’s River (March 1986) 11 London Ecology Unit A Nature Conservation Strategy for London (Ecology Handbook 4) Nature Conservation in Hounslow (Ecology Handbook 15) 1990 Nature Conservation in Kingston
    [Show full text]
  • Written Statement of the 2005 UDP (Pdf, 2577KB)
    IMPORTANT NOTE: The Unitary Development Plan (UDP) is gradually being replaced by the Local Development Framework. Check the planning policy pages on the Council’s website (http://www.richmond.gov.uk/planning_guidance_and_policies.htm) for details of when policies and proposal sites have been superseded. This copy of the original UDP First Review 2005 replicates the text of the written statement for information (issued February 2012). Images and maps are not included. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Planning Policy and Design: 2nd Floor Civic Centre, York Street, Twickenham, TW1 3BZ Telephone: 020 8891 7117 Email: [email protected] LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN: FIRST REVIEW Adopted 1 March 2005 WRITTEN STATEMENT Prepared in accordance with section 13 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 27 of the Planning and Compensation Act 1991 FOREWORD The Unitary Development Plan First Review is the land use plan for the Borough, and seeks, through its policies and proposals, to guide development, as well as to protect and enhance the Borough’s special environment, for present and future generations. The Plan is set in the context of national and regional planning guidance, but the policies are tailored for this Borough’s unique environment, characterised by its well- loved Royal Parks large open spaces, many historic buildings and conservation areas, attractive town centres and residential areas and extensive River Thames frontage. New developments must recognise and enhance this special character. A key initiative of the Council is its Civic Pride programme, which is intended to make Richmond upon Thames the safest, cleanest and greenest Borough in London.
    [Show full text]
  • An Audit of London Burial Provision
    An Audit of London Burial Provision A report for the Greater London Authority by Julie Rugg and Nicholas Pleace, Cemetery Research Group, University of York 1 Contents List of tables 3 List of figures 3 1 Introduction 4 2 The demand for and supply of space for burial 6 Introduction 6 Demand for burial space 6 Supply of burial space 12 Conclusion 21 3 Reclamation and re‐use 22 Grave reclamation and re‐use 22 Re‐use under faculty jurisdiction 23 Conclusion 25 4. Recommendations 26 Borough summaries 27 Table conventions 27 Owner 27 Name 27 Date 27 Area 27 Status 95 27 Status 10 28 Total burials 95 28 Total burials 09 28 Capacity 28 Barking and Dagenham 29 Barnet 30 Bexley 31 Brent 32 Bromley 33 Camden 34 Croydon 35 Ealing 36 Enfield 37 Greenwich 38 Hackney 39 Hammersmith & Fulham 40 Haringey 41 Harrow 42 Havering 43 2 Hillingdon 44 Hounslow 45 Kensington and Chelsea 46 Kingston upon Thames 47 Lambeth 48 Lewisham 49 Merton 50 Newham 51 Redbridge 52 Richmond upon Thames 53 Southwark 54 Sutton 55 Waltham Forest 56 Wandsworth 57 List of tables Table 2.1: Projected total burials and required burial space for inner London boroughs for the period 2010/1‐2030/1 11 Table 2.2: Projected total burials and required burial space for outer London boroughs for the period 2010/1‐2030/1 12 Table 2.3: Operational capacity of private and borough cemeteries, 1995 and 2009 13 Table 2.4: Borough capacity status 17 Table 2.5: Additional burial grounds 20 Table 2.6: London Borough provision outside Greater London 21 Table 3.1: Reclamation and re‐use summary 24 Table 3.2: Grave types and re‐use applicability 25 List of figures Figure 2.1: Projected death rates in London, 2010/11‐2030/31 6 Figure 2.2: Cremation numbers in London 8 Figure 2.3: London boroughs by the projected proportion of all estimated burials that will be Muslim people, 2010/11‐2030/1.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames
    Official LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, CRIME AND POLICING ACT 2014 LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES PUBLIC SPACES PROTECTION ORDER 2020 (DOG CONTROL) The Council of the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (in this Order called “the Council”) hereby makes the following Order pursuant to Section 59 of the Anti- social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (“the Act”). This Order may be cited as the “London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Public Spaces Protection Order 2017 (Dog Control)”. This Order came into force on 16 October 2017 and lasted for a period of 3 years from that date. This Order was extended, pursuant to section 60 of the Act, for a period of 3 years from 2020. This Order can be extended pursuant to section 60 of the Act. In this Order the following definitions apply: “Person in charge” means the person who has the dog in his possession, care or company at the time the offence is committed or, if none, the owner or person who habitually has the dog in his possession. “Restricted area” means the land described and/or shown in the maps in the Schedule to this Order. “Authorised officer” means a police officer, PCSO, Council officer, and persons authorised by the Council to enforce this Order. "Assistance dog" means a dog that is trained to aid or assist a disabled person. The masculine includes the feminine. The Offences Article 1 - Dog Fouling If within the restricted area, a dog defecates, at any time, and the person who is in charge of the dog fails to remove the faeces from the restricted area forthwith, that person shall be guilty of an offence unless – a.
    [Show full text]
  • TLS REVIEW REPORT SEPTEMBER 2012.Indd
    THE RECREATION LANDSCAPE 2.123 2012 Update: This section establishes the main reasons for visiting the Arcadian Thames and summarises the ways that visitors use, move about and understand the river corridor. It celebrates the network of opportunities for recreation and sets out ways to provide a welcoming, connected, legible and accessible landscape. 2.124 Strategic guidance is set out in: • The London Plan The 18th Century river landscape was designed for the pleasure of • The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) the court • Mayor’s Tourism Plan for South London • The River Thames Alliance Thames Waterway Plan The Arcadian Thames 2.125 2012 Update: The London Plan proposes a series of Strategic Cultural Areas for London. These are designated as those places that help to make London a unique and vibrant city. The Thames corridor between Hampton and Kew has been recognised as one of London’s cultural areas and is referred to as ‘London’s Arcadia’. A Connected Landscape 2.126 2012 Update: The Arcadian Thames was originally laid out for the private enjoyment of the court. It was the cradle of the English Landscape Movement and inspired generations of artists, writers, poets and thinkers. During the 19th century however, this privileged landscape was opened up for the public to enjoy, quickly earning a reputation as the playground for London. Today, the River À ows through a green corridor of parks, palaces, visitor attractions, wildlife sites and historic settlements un-equalled in any During the 19th Century the other European capital city. These spaces form the largest connected Arcadian Thames was opened up for everyone to enjoy area of public open space in the metropolis offering the visitor an amazing combination of different leisure and learning experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Start and Finish at St Mary with St Alban Church
    A WALK IN TEDDINGTON: 1 Start and finish at St Mary with St Alban Church The old village of Teddington stretched from the river to the railway bridge, which was the site of the village pond through which the railway was built in the early 1860s. The church of St Mary (1) was the old parish church, parts dating from the 16th century. During the incumbency of the Rev Stephen Hales (1709-61) much rebuilding was carried out, the north aisle and the tower being added. The church was too small for the increasing population and in the 19th century more enlargements were carried out until a new church seemed to be the only solution. So the church of St Alban the Martyr (2) was built on the opposite side of the road. The building, which is in the French Gothic style on the scale of a cathedral, was opened in July1896. However, plans were over-ambitious and the money ran out before the west end of the nave was completed. When the new church was opened the old one was closed, but not everybody liked the new church so St Mary’s was repaired and services were held in both churches until 1972. By this time the number of worshippers had diminished and running expenses had risen so much that two churches could no longer be maintained. St Alban’s became redundant and was to be pulled down. Vandals damaged what remained of the internal fittings and part of the copper roof was taken before the destruction was stopped.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 De Mortuis
    De Mortuis enough, he also supported a whole host of various soci- GUS ARMSTRONG (1943) (1925—2012) eties. In his family life he was married to Joan for 25 years Tribute by John Glasscock: producing Kevin and Jackie. Kevin in due course had ‘We have come together to grand-children in whom Gus took great interest. After pay our respects and say Joan’s sad early death, Gus married Beryl who had good-bye to an old friend, been widowed by the loss of the late Derek Walker who whether as family, col- had also been at Tiffin School with us both, and so an leagues or a representa- enlarged family added to a range of activities for them tives of one of his many both. They enjoyed busy lives in their 25 years of mar- outside interests. riage, spending a lot of time in their second home in We each bring our own spe- Cornwall where Gus enjoyed active membership of Tre- cial memories of Geoffrey, vose Golf Club. Geoff, or as many of you Gus’s golfing came to a premature end as he struggled knew him ‘Gus’, and I can- for many years with various health problems. He and not do justice in such a Beryl have faced some difficult times with great forti- short time to all that he achieved in such a long life, nor tude. Gus made light of his problems with determina- what he meant to so many people. I can only offer a tion and a sense of humour which was never far from general tribute to the man as I knew him, many of you, the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Casualties of the AUXILIARY TERRITORIAL SERVICE
    Casualties of the AUXILIARY TERRITORIAL SERVICE From the Database of The Commonwealth War Graves Commission Casualties of the AUXILIARY TERRITORIAL SERVICE. From the Database of The Commonwealth War Graves Commission. Austria KLAGENFURT WAR CEMETERY Commonwealth War Dead 1939-1945 DIXON, Lance Corporal, RUBY EDITH, W/242531. Auxiliary Territorial Service. 4th October 1945. Age 22. Daughter of James and Edith Annie Dixon, of Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire. 6. A. 6. TOLMIE, Subaltern, CATHERINE, W/338420. Auxiliary Territorial Service. 14th November 1947. Age 32. Daughter of Alexander and Mary Tolmie, of Drumnadrochit, Inverness-shire. 8. C. 10. Belgium BRUGGE GENERAL CEMETERY - Brugge, West-Vlaanderen Commonwealth War Dead 1939-1945 MATHER, Lance Serjeant, DORIS, W/39228. Auxiliary Territorial Service attd. Royal Corps of Sig- nals. 24th August 1945. Age 23. Daughter of George L. and Edith Mather, of Hull. Plot 63. Row 5. Grave 1 3. BRUSSELS TOWN CEMETERY - Evere, Vlaams-Brabant Commonwealth War Dead 1939-1945 EASTON, Private, ELIZABETH PEARSON, W/49689. 1st Continental Group. Auxiliary Territorial Ser- vice. 25th December 1944. Age 22. X. 27. 19. MORGAN, Private, ELSIE, W/264085. 2nd Continental Group. Auxiliary Territorial Service. 30th Au- gust 1945. Age 26. Daughter of Alfred Henry and Jane Midgley Morgan, of Newcastle-on-Tyne. X. 32. 14. SMITH, Private, BEATRICE MARY, W/225214. 'E' Coy., 1st Continental Group. Auxiliary Territorial Service. 14th November 1944. Age 25. X. 26. 12. GENT CITY CEMETERY - Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen Commonwealth War Dead 1939-1945 FELLOWS, Private, DORIS MARY, W/76624. Auxiliary Territorial Service attd. 137 H.A.A. Regt. Royal Artillery. 23rd May 1945. Age 21.
    [Show full text]