DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document 49701 Uganda Legal and Judicial Sector Study July 2009 Uganda Legal and Judicial Sector Study Legal Vice Presidency The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Uganda Legal and Judicial Sector Study Report THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. July 2009 Washington, DC 20433 Tel: (202) 477-1234 Fax: (202) 477-6391 E-mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: http://www.worldbank.org/lji Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Legal Vice Presidency Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. 1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................... 3 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 1 OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................................. 1 REPORT STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................................... 2 CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................................... 3 OVERALL FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................... 3 FINDINGS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JLOS SIP ..................................................................................... 4 B. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 7 POLITICAL CLIMATE ................................................................................................................................... 7 ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ....................................................................................................... 8 JUSTICE, LAW AND ORDER IN THE PEAP ................................................................................................... 9 OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................10 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................................10 METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................................................11 1. THE JUSTICE, LAW AND ORDER SECTOR .............................................................................12 1.1. HISTORY OF THE JLOS .................................................................................................................12 1.2. THE JLOS INVESTMENT PLAN I: GOALS, PURPOSES AND ACTIONS .................................................13 1.3. TRANSITION INTO SIP II ................................................................................................................15 1.4. OBJECTIVES OF SIP II ..................................................................................................................15 1.5. MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION OF THE JLOS .........................................................................17 1.6. PREVIOUS REVIEWS OF THE SIP ....................................................................................................20 2. SECTOR INSTITUTIONS: MANDATES AND ISSUES ..............................................................22 2.1. THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS (“MOJCA”) .......................................22 2.2. ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT ...................................................................................22 2.3. UGANDA LAW COUNCIL ................................................................................................................26 2.4. THE DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (“DPP”) ..............................................................28 2.5. THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS ............................................................................................29 2.6. COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMME ..............................................................................................29 2.7. DIRECTORATE OF IMMIGRATION ...................................................................................................30 2.8. GOVERNMENT ANALYTICAL LABORATORY (“GAL”) .......................................................................30 2.9. AMNESTY COMMISSION .................................................................................................................31 2.10. THE UGANDA POLICE FORCE (“UPF”) ........................................................................................31 2.11. THE UGANDA PRISONS SERVICE ....................................................................................................32 2.12. UGANDA JUDICIARY .....................................................................................................................33 2.13. THE JUDICIAL STUDIES INSTITUTE (“JSI”) ...................................................................................42 2.14. JUDICIAL SERVICE COMMISSION (“JSC”) .....................................................................................43 2.15. THE UGANDA LAW REFORM COMMISSION (“ULRC”) ...................................................................44 2.16. MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT – LOCAL COUNCIL COURTS ....................................................44 2.17. MINISTRY OF GENDER LABOUR AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT – PROBATION SERVICES (“MGLSD”) 47 3. ADEQUACY AND RELEVANCE OF LEGAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING .....................48 3.1. INTRODUCTION: HISTORY OF LEGAL EDUCATION IN UGANDA ........................................................48 3.2. LEGAL EDUCATION IN UGANDA TODAY .........................................................................................49 4. IMPLEMENTATION OF JLOS INVESTMENT PLAN ..............................................................55 4.2. COMMERCIAL JUSTICE REFORM PROGRAMME (“CJRP”)..............................................................61 4.3. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AT CADER ..........................................................................65 4.4. TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL (“TAT”) .................................................................................................68 4.5. UGANDA REGISTRATION SERVICES BUREAU (“URSB”) .................................................................69 4.6. THE PRIORITIZATION OF THE COMMERCIAL COURT .......................................................................69 4.7. LEGAL PROFESSION AND LEGAL EDUCATION IN COMMERCIAL LAW ...............................................70 4.8. LAND JUSTICE REFORM ................................................................................................................71 4.9. FAMILY JUSTICE REFORM .............................................................................................................72 4.10. OVERALL EXAMINATION OF THE SIP: QUALITY, SCOPE & PRIORITIES ..............................................73 5. ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE JLOS INSTITUTIONS ..........................................................75 5.1. COMPARISON OF ACCESSIBILITY OF THE VARIOUS COURTS .............................................................75 5.2. ACCESSIBILITY OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM ..........................................................................................80 5.3. GENDER AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE .................................................................................................81 5.4. CONFLICT AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE ..............................................................................................82 6. ROLE OF NON-STATE ACTORS IN SIP IMPLEMENTATION ..............................................87 6.1. RELEVANCE OF SIP I OBJECTIVES TO NON-STATE ACTORS .............................................................87 6.2. CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS (“CSOS”) ...................................................................................87 6.3. THE PRIVATE SECTOR ...................................................................................................................90 7. FINANCING OF THE SIP ...............................................................................................................92 7.1. POLICY FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................92 7.2. SECTORAL ALLOCATIONS ...............................................................................................................93 7.3. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE JLOS ......................................................................................94 8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...........................................................................97 8.1. THE COMMERCIAL COURT AND CADER .......................................................................................97
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cabinet Handbook
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA THE CABINET HANDBOOK Cabinet Secretariat Office of the President www.cabinetsecretariat.go.ug December 2008 FOREWORD I am pleased to introduce the Cabinet Handbook which provides clear and comprehensive policy management guidelines for the Cabinet and other arms of Government involved in the policy management process. Cabinet is the highest policy making organ of government and is therefore responsible for policy development and its successful implementation. Cabinet collectively, and Ministers individually, have a primary duty to ensure that government policy best serves the public interest. This Cabinet Handbook outlines the principles by which Cabinet operates. It also sets out the procedures laid down to facilitate Cabinet’s realization of its central role of determining government policy and supporting ministers in meeting their individual and collective responsibilities, facilitating coordinated and strategic policy development. In the recent past, my government has made major contributions in the documentation and improvement of processes and procedures that support decision making at all levels of government. In conformity to our principle of transforming government processes and achieving greater transparency, and effectiveness in our management of policy; my government has focused its attention on introducing best practices in the processes and procedures that support decision making at all levels of Government. This Cabinet Handbook is primarily intended for Cabinet Ministers and Ministers of State. However, it must be read by all officers that are in various ways associated with the policy process, so that they are guided to make a better contribution to Cabinet's efficient functioning. The Secretary to Cabinet and the Cabinet Secretariat are available to offer advice and assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda's Constitution of 1995 with Amendments Through 2017
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:53 constituteproject.org Uganda's Constitution of 1995 with Amendments through 2017 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:53 Table of contents Preamble . 14 NATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY . 14 General . 14 I. Implementation of objectives . 14 Political Objectives . 14 II. Democratic principles . 14 III. National unity and stability . 15 IV. National sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity . 15 Protection and Promotion of Fundamental and other Human Rights and Freedoms . 15 V. Fundamental and other human rights and freedoms . 15 VI. Gender balance and fair representation of marginalised groups . 15 VII. Protection of the aged . 16 VIII. Provision of adequate resources for organs of government . 16 IX. The right to development . 16 X. Role of the people in development . 16 XI. Role of the State in development . 16 XII. Balanced and equitable development . 16 XIII. Protection of natural resources . 16 Social and Economic Objectives . 17 XIV. General social and economic objectives . 17 XV. Recognition of role of women in society . 17 XVI. Recognition of the dignity of persons with disabilities . 17 XVII. Recreation and sports . 17 XVIII. Educational objectives . 17 XIX. Protection of the family . 17 XX. Medical services . 17 XXI. Clean and safe water . 17 XXII. Food security and nutrition . 18 XXIII. Natural disasters . 18 Cultural Objectives . 18 XXIV. Cultural objectives . 18 XXV. Preservation of public property and heritage . 18 Accountability . 18 XXVI. Accountability . 18 The Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995
    CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA, 1995. Arrangement of the Constitution. Preliminary matter. Arrangement of objectives. Arrangement of chapters and schedules. Arrangement of articles. Preamble. National objectives and directive principles of State policy. Chapters. Schedules. THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA, 1995. National Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy. Arrangement of Objectives. Objective General. I. Implementation of objectives. Political objectives. II. Democratic principles. III. National unity and stability. IV. National sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity. Protection and promotion of fundamental and other human rights and freedoms. V. Fundamental and other human rights and freedoms. VI. Gender balance and fair representation of marginalised groups. VII. Protection of the aged. VIII. Provision of adequate resources for organs of Government. IX. The right to development. X. Role of the people in development. XI. Role of the State in development. XII. Balanced and equitable development. XIII. Protection of natural resources. Social and economic objectives. XIV. General social and economic objectives. XV. Recognition of the role of women in society. XVI. Recognition of the dignity of persons with disabilities. XVII. Recreation and sports. XVIII. Educational objectives. XIX. Protection of the family. XX. Medical services. XXI. Clean and safe water. 1 XXII. Food security and nutrition. XXIII. Natural disasters. Cultural objectives. XXIV. Cultural objectives. XXV. Preservation of public property and heritage. Accountability. XXVI. Accountability. The environment. XXVII. The environment. Foreign policy objectives. XXVIII. Foreign policy objectives. Duties of a citizen. XXIX. Duties of a citizen. THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA, 1995. Arrangement of Chapters and Schedules. Chapter 1. The Constitution. 2. The Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule by Law: Discriminatory Legislation and Legitimized Abuses in Uganda
    RULE BY LAW DIscRImInAtORy legIslAtIOn AnD legItImIzeD Abuses In ugAnDA Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2014 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2014 Index: AFR 59/06/2014 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo: Ugandan activists demonstrate in Kampala on 26 February 2014 against the Anti-Pornography Act. © Isaac Kasamani amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Judicial Review in Uganda & South
    Concordia University - Portland CU Commons Faculty Scholarship School of Law 2009 African Courts and Separation of Powers: A Comparative Study of Judicial Review in Uganda & South Joseph M. Isanga Concordia University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.cu-portland.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons CU Commons Citation Joseph M. Isanga, African Courts and Separation of Powers: A Comparative Study of Judicial Review in Uganda & South, 2 Nw. Interdisc. L. Rev. 69, 102 (2009). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at CU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of CU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AFRICAN COURTS AND SEPARATION OF POWERS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN UGANDA & SOUTH Dr. Joseph M. Isanga, LL.B, LL.M, J.S.D.* Ave MariaSchool of Law Abstract: Achieving political stability in a transitional democracy is a fundamental goal, the resoluteness of which is in part maintained by courts of judicial review that are independent from political bias and devoid of deference to traditionally more powerful branches of government. The recent democratic transitions occurring in the African nations of South Africa and Uganda provide a unique, contemporary insight into the formation of a constitutional jurisprudence. This study is an examination of pivotal cases decided by the Constitutional Courts of South Africa and Uganda, the roles that these decisions play in political stability, and the potential for political bias in the interpretation of a newborn constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Conference and Peers' Review Roundtable: Giving Full
    Parliamentary Conference and Peers’ Review Roundtable: Giving Full Effect to Principle of Complementarity Efforts in Uganda and the DR Congo Thursday 17 July 2014, Parliament of Uganda In the framework of its project “Promoting Effective Complementarity in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): Putting an End to Impunity and Preventing International Crimes within the Rome Statute (RS) of the International Criminal Court (ICC) System”, PGA convened a “Parliamentary Conference and Peers’ Review Roundtable: Giving Full Effect to Principle of Complementarity Efforts in Uganda and the DR Congo” hosted by the Parliament of Uganda on 17 July, on the occasion of the International Justice Day. This Seminar aimed to provide a platform for Members of Parliament (MPs) from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda, at the presence of PGA’s Board member from the UK, to discuss how to best cooperate in fighting impunity for international crimes under the complementarity principle of the Rome Statute of the ICC. Complementarity regulates the relationship between the primary responsibility of States to put an end to impunity for international crimes and the complementary responsibility of the ICC. The discussions brought together around 100 participants, including over 40 parliamentarians from the Parliament of Uganda and the DRC and more than 50 representatives of the Government, international organisations, civil society, the media, the academia and other relevant stakeholders. In addition, the Conference benefited from the participation of a member of PGA Executive Committee, Mr. Mark Pritchard MP, Co-Convenor of PGA’s International Law and Human Rights Programme and Vice Chair of the UK All Party Parliamentary Uganda Group, to encourage an inter-exchange on the steps that need to be taken to give full effect to the principle of complementarity in Uganda and the DRC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Uganda in the High Court of Uganda Holden at Kampala Commercial Division Civil Suit No 1031
    5 The Republic of Uganda In The High Court of Uganda Holden at Kampala Commercial Division Civil Suit No 1031 'of 2019 " . ILISO Consulting (Pty) Ltd 10 Eng. Dr. Anania Mbabazi Janepher Mbabazi ................................................ Plaintiffs Versus l.Iliso Consulting (Pty) Ltd tj a Nako Incorporated in South Africa 15 2. Uganda Revenue Authority 3.Grant Thornton Consulting Ltd :::::::::::::::::::: Defendants Before: Hon. Justice Dr. Henry Peter Adonyo Ruling On a Preliminary Objection 1. Background: 20 On the 15th December 2020 this matter came up for scheduling. The 2nd defendant informed court that it intends to make a it- • 5 preliminary point of law on the matter. The matter was adjourned to 11th January 2021 Counsel for the second defendant to raise the preliminary point of law. On that date Counsel for the Second defendant submitted that the said . ~. suit was prematurely instituted against the 2nd defendant on 10 the basis that though this court has an unlimited jurisdiction, it did not have original jurisdiction to hear tax disputes given that the dispute between the plaintiffs and 2nd defendant is a tax dispute in respect of assessment of UGX 1,469,083,334/ = which the 1st plaintiff objected to. 15 That being the case, counsel sought for and requested the court to have this suit dismissed as the point of law substantially disposes off the whole suit. While arguing the point of law, counsel relied on a number of provisions of the law citing Article 152(3) of the 1995 20 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda which provides for establishment of the tax tribunal for purpose of setting tax dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court Judges
    PRINCIPAL JUDGE'S CHAMBERS HIGH COURT OF UGANDA POBOX 7085 TELEGRAMS: KAMPALA-UGANDA TELEPHONE: 041-4-341257 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN ANY CORRESPONDENCE ON THIS SUBJECT·PIJEASE QUOTE NO. PJ/ADM.C.47 HIGH COURT OF UGANDA ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 01. OF 2015 HIGH COURT DIVISIONS AND CIRCUITS RE: NEW POSTINGS To : All Judges, High Court of Uganda Following the recent appointments within the judicial service and in consultation with the Hon. The Chief Justice, the following changes take effect: SNO. NAME CURRENT NEW, STATION RESPONSIBILITY STATION 1. Hon. Justice Albert F. Rugadya Atwoki Criminal Division Masindi Execution & 2. Hon. Justice Ezekiel Muhanguzi ICD IACD Bailiffs Division Head 3. Hon. Lady Justice Margaret O. Oguli Masaka Civil Division Deputy Head 4. Hon. Lady Justice Jane F.B.Kiggundu EDI JSI Family Division Central Circuit - 5. Hon. Justice Wilson Masalu Musene Nakawa Criminal Division Head Executive 6. Hon. Justice Henry P. Adonyo Commercial Director/JSI Execution & 7. Hon. Lady Justice Flavia S. Anglin Commercial BailiffS Division Deputy Head 8. Hon. Lady Justice E.K. Kabanda Land Division Criminal Division 9. Hon. Lady Justice Jessica N. Land Division Ayebazibwe Mbale 10. Hon. Lady Justice Damalie N. Central Circuit- Lwanga. Land Nakawa ·,- Note: Hon. Justice E. Muhanguzi's deployment to Execution & Bailiffs Division takes immediate effect subject of course to completion of any partly heard cases in advanced stage at current station. Other deployments also subject to completion of partly heard cases in advanced stage at old stations, December 31, 2015 being cut-off date. As per the advice of Parliament to the appointing authority, promoted Judges are to first complete writing the pending judgments/rulings in matters they have completed hearing before assuming their new positions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Training Toolkit
    Property Rights and Gender A Training Toolkit Property Rights in Marriage and Family Uganda Property Rights Toolkit - Marriage.indd 1 10/8/10 10:47 AM ICRW and ULA thank the following organizations and individuals whose generous contributions made this toolkit possible: Funder An Anonymous Donor Partners and Collaborators Rita Aciro-Lakor Jacqueline Asiimwe-Mwesige Centre for Basic Research Luwero Nakaseke Paralegals Association © 2010 International Center for Research on Women and Uganda Land Alliance. Information contained in this publication may be freely reproduced, published or otherwise used without permission from the International Center for Research on Women and the Uganda Land Alliance. However, these organizations request that they be cited as the source of the information. Uganda Property Rights Toolkit - Marriage.indd 2 10/8/10 10:47 AM About this Toolkit Property rights economically empower women Trainers can do all modules or focus on ones by creating opportunities for earning income, of their choosing. However, we recommend securing their place in the community and beginning with “Rights and Gender in ensuring their livelihoods. When women are Uganda,” especially for community rights economically empowered, it spurs develop- workers with little previous training. This ment for their families and communities. module uses a human rights approach as a positive starting point to introduce women’s Property Rights and Gender in Uganda: rights, property rights and gender. A Training Toolkit seeks to strengthen understanding of property rights for women The modules use five different methods to and men as equal citizens. Because women engage participants: in Uganda are often not treated as equal ■■ Background sections introduce new mate- citizens, toolkit materials address what rights rial, explain new concepts and discuss the women have, how to communicate women’s gendered aspects of the module topic.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Crimes Division of the High Court of Uganda: Towards Greater Effectiveness
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA: TOWARDS GREATER EFFECTIVENESS 2018 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA: TOWARDS GREATER EFFECTIVENESS B THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA: TOWARDS GREATER EFFECTIVENESS THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA: TOWARDS GREATER EFFECTIVENESS 2018 i THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA: TOWARDS GREATER EFFECTIVENESS Acknowledgements This report is based on a study that the Uganda Law Society (ULS) undertook under a 6–month project funded by the Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law (the Platform). This project was titled “The International Crimes Division of the High Court of Uganda: Towards Greater Effectiveness”. The ULS hereby conveys its deep appreciation to the Platform for its financial support toward this important project. Special thanks also go to key personalities who have informed the content of this study report including the Registrar of the International Crimes Division of the High Court of Uganda–Mrs. Harriet Ssali Abrahams, Ms. Jane Anywar Adong–Ugandan Field Counsel of the International Criminal Court, Victim communities and Community leaders in Northern Uganda; and to the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Uganda for supporting the ULS in disseminating this report on its various platforms. This report has been generated by Mr. Peter Katonene Mwesigwa, Ms. Jane Amooti with support from Ms. Irene Shirley Kwaga. Whereas the Platform provided financial
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2009 on Uganda’S Legal System
    EVIDENCE REPORT No 44 IDSSexuality, Poverty and Law The Implications of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2009 on Uganda’s Legal System Adrian Jjuuko and Francis Tumwesige November 2013 The IDS programme on Strengthening Evidence-based Policy works across seven key themes. Each theme works with partner institutions to co-construct policy-relevant knowledge and engage in policy-influencing processes. This material has been developed under the Sexuality, Poverty and Law theme. The development of this material has been led by IDS and the Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum - Uganda (HRAPF) who jointly hold the copyright. The material has been funded by UK aid from the UK Government, however the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK Government’s official policies. AG Level 2 Output ID: 202 THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE ANTI-HOMOSEXUALITY BILL 2009 ON UGANDA’S LEGAL SYSTEM Adrian Jjuuko and Francis Tumwesige November 2013 This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are clearly credited. First published by the Institute of Development Studies in November 2013 © Institute of Development Studies 2013 IDS is a charitable company limited by guarantee and registered in England (No. 877338). Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 The Anti-Homosexuality Bill: contents, background and current status 3 2.1 Contents of the bill 3 2.2 Reactions to the bill 4 2.3 Amended or not
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Periodic Review Stakeholders Joint Submission
    Universal Periodic Review Stakeholders Joint Submission Compiled and Submitted by Human Rights Focus Gulu on Behalf of Districts Human Rights Promotion and Protection Sub-committee. March 14, 2011 Executive Summary 1. This is a joint submission by civil society organisations working in northern Uganda under the Human Rights Promotion and Protection (DHRPP) sub-committee of the District Disaster Management Committee to monitor protection and promotion of human rights for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), including but not limited to, the rights to food, water, shelter, clothes, medical care and education. The submission was led by the Human Rights Focus (HURIFO) and includes among others the African Center for Treatment of Torture Victims (ACTV)- Gulu, Norwegian Refugee Council- Information, Counseling and Legal Assistance (NRC-ICLA), Acholi Religious Leaders Peace Initiative (ARLPI), Danish Refugee Council (DRC), Norwegian Refugee Council, Gulu Disabled Persons Union (GDPU), Gulu Deaf Association (GDA), and Refugee Law Project- Gulu. Civil and Political Rights The right to personal liberty and security of persons: 2. The government of Uganda has played a critical role by ensuring peace prevails in northern Uganda. During the LRA insurgency, many security operatives1 were created. However they have not to date been demobilized or absorbed in to the formal government’s security system. Many continue to impersonate as employees of high offices namely, Resident District Commissioners, Presidential Advisors, Police or Joint Command Centre
    [Show full text]