9Th International Conference of the Orthopterists' Society
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Special Meeting Issue Ninth International Conference of the Orthopterists’ Society Integrative Biology in Orthopteran Research Canmore, Alberta, Canada Aug 14-19, 2005 Presented by the Orthopterists’ Society and University of Lethbridge 2 Art by Karen Brownlee; full description in final program Ninth International Conference of the Orthopterists’ Society Canmore, Alberta, Canada, August 14-19, 2005 Program Saturday August 13 - Sunday August 14 Arrivals and transport from Calgary to Canmore. (Contact [email protected] in advance for a ride from the Calgary International Airport to the Radisson Hotel and Conference Centre in Canmore) Sunday August 14 1330 – 1900 Registration of participants (continues Monday). Refreshments. 1 Art by Karen Brownlee; full description in final program Monday August 15 – Registration open 0730 - 1400 OPENING CEREMONY (main plenary room, Lady Slipper- Orchid) 0820 Call to the meeting (Piper Andrew Watchman) 0830 Opening of the Conference, from the Orthopterists’ Society; Michel Lecoq (Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement, CIRAD-Locust Ecology and Control Unit, France), President of the Orthopterists’ Society 0835 Welcome, and Introduction to the Conference; Dan L. Johnson, Conference Chair 0845 Welcome from Bill Cade, President of the University of Lethbridge 0850 Welcome from the Radisson Hotel and Conference Centre, and Canmore 0900 In-coming President’s Remarks: Michel Lecoq 0925 Welcome and Remarks from Executive Director Gregory Sword 2 0935 Nicholas D. Jago Memorial, presented by Andrew W. Harvey, FAO Locust & Sunn Pest Campaign Manager 1000 Thanks by Conference Chair 1000 – 1030 Coffee/Refreshment Break PLENARY LECTURES 1030 Call to order and Introduction of Plenary Speaker 1035 Michel Lecoq, CIRAD-Locust Ecology and Control Unit, France Integrated locust management in developing countries : From ecology to anthropology. 1115 Introduction of Plenary Speaker 1120 Stephen Simpson, Department of Zoology and Oxford University Museum of Natural History, UK Phase change in locusts: from neurones to populations 1200-1330 Lunch (provided in the Conference Centre, for registered participants) 1330 Reconvene for Plenary Symposia All Plenary Symposia are in Lady Slipper- Orchid, the main meeting room of the conference. Poster sessions and the banquet will also be held in this room. Posters can be put up any time on Sunday or Monday, and remain on display until Friday. The attended Poster Session is Thursday 0930 – 1030, just before concurrent submitted papers. 3 Plenary Symposium 1: Is Research a Sufficient Driver for Acridid Pest Control? Recent progress and key concerns in locust and grasshopper management. Co-chairs : Michel Lecoq, CIRAD-Locust Ecology and Control Unit, France, and Alexandre Latchininsky, Applied Acridology International, University of Wyoming, USA. Introduction: Orthopteroid insects are an essential component of the fauna of many ecosystems, in particular grasslands. Diverse and abundant, they play an important role in nutrient cycling and provide the food base for numerous animals, especially birds, mammals and reptiles. Although abiotic (weather) and biotic (natural enemies) factors keep their numbers under control most of the time, ever so often this regulatory mechanism fails, and a rapid build-up of population occurs. Such upsurge may lead to an outbreak of a local, regional or even transcontinental scale. If such an event happens, the orthopteroid pests (katydids and, much more frequently, the acridids) can destroy sufficient forage to cause human suffering, economic loss, or environmental damage. In such cases, the central dilemma of pest management is that we cannot avoid risks by failing to take action. Allowing a pest outbreak to proceed without intervention can be potentially harmful for humans and the environment. However, there is no doubt that attempts to alter the course of an acridid pest outbreak have incumbent risks, too. Acridid control programs represent risks at an ecosystem level. Chemical insecticides may reduce biodiversity, degrade soil, air, water quality, and bioaccumulate in the food web. Introduced biological control agents may undermine the delicate integrity of co-evolved relationships within an ecosystem. Furthermore, there are potential hazards to human health. Finally, economic and socio-political impacts of large-scale acridid management programs are poorly understood. The end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries were characterized by severe locust and grasshopper outbreaks in different geographical areas. Paradoxically, this upsurge of pest activities coincided with a marked decline of research centers in applied acridology throughout the world, which dramatically reduced our capacity to develop and implement safer, cheaper, and more efficient pest management practices. What challenges are we facing today in the domain of acridid pest control? What traditional and novel tools do we have in our arsenal? Is research a sufficient driver for making acridid pest management sustainable? These questions constitute the leitmotif of the current symposium on the state-of-the-art of the acridid pest management in the new millennium. 4 Plenary Symposium 1 Presentations (each presented paper in Symposium 1 is 20 minutes in length, plus 5 minutes for summary, questions or discussion) 1330 Jeffrey Lockwood, University of Wyoming, USA. Aquinas and Acridids: Waging a just war against an insect enemy 1355 Ralf Peveling, University of Basel, Switzerland. We believe what we see – and vice versa: Evidence versus perception in locust control 1420 David H. Branson, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Northern Plains Agricultural Research Lab, Sidney, MT, USA. Ecological research as a needed driver for preventative management of Acridids 1445 Michael G. Sergeev, Novosibirsk State University, Russia. Ecology and economy of the Italian locust outbreaks: Between the horns of dilemmas 1510 Graham A. Matthews, Imperial College, London, UK. The Pesticide Referee Group of FAO and its contribution to locust control 1535 Coffee/Refreshment Break (15 minutes) 1550 David Hunter, Australia. The use of Metarhizium in the integrated pest management of locusts and grasshoppers 1615 Alexandre Latchininsky, University of Wyoming, USA. Locust and grasshopper management in the countries of the former Soviet Union: New challenges 1640 Jean-François Duranton, CIRAD, and Annie Monard, FAO. Contribution to the bioecological study of two Peruvian locusts, Schistocerca cf. interrita Scudder, 1899 and Schistocerca piceifrons peruviana Lynch Arribalzaga, 1903 (Orthoptera: Cyrtacanthacridinae) 5 1705 Coffee/Refreshment Break (10 minutes) 1715 M. A. Ould Babah, M.L. Ould Ahmedou, M.E. Ould Jaevar, and S.A. Ould Mohamed, Centre national de lutte antiacridienne, BP 665, Nouakchott, Mauritania. Management of a major Desert Locust upsurge in Mauritania (2003–2004) 1740 Dan L. Johnson, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, Ray G. Poulin, L. Danielle Todd, University of Alberta, Priya Mir, and Brad Linderman Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. Reconciling orthopteran pest management with environmental protection and conservation of biodiversity 1805 V.E. Kambulin, Institute for Plant Protection, Almaty, Kazakhstan. Italian locust in Kazakhstan: 145 уеаrs of warfare 1830 Yeneneh T. Belayneh, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA. Acridid pest management in the developing world; can it be done? - A challenge to the rural populations, a dilemma to the international community 1900 Reception (Monday evening), Vic’s Steakhouse & Bar, Radisson Hotel and Conference Centre; Hosted by the President of the University of Lethbridge 6 Tuesday August 16 Plenary Symposium 2: Hybrid Zones: Evolutionary Dead-end or Cradle of Innovation? Moderator : Daniel Howard (New Mexico State University) (each presented paper in Symposium 2 is 25 minutes in length, plus 5 minutes for summary, questions or discussion) 0830 Charles Ross, New Mexico State University, USA. Mosaic hybrid zone structure znd maintenance as moderators for introgression between the field crickets, Gryllus firmus and G. pennsylvanicus. 0900 Klaus-Gerhard Heller, Magdeburg, Germany. Hybrid zones and other consequences of contact between (sub)species in the genus Poecilimon (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea: Phaneropteridae) 0930 Jeremy Marshall, University of Texas at Arlington, USA. Gametic isolation, reinforcement, and rapid speciation in an Allonemobius hybrid zone 1000 Coffee/Refreshment Break 7 1030 Kerry L. Shaw, Kyle Wagner, and Jennifer Jadin, University of Maryland. Testing hypotheses for bimodal hybrid zones with examples from simulated and real crickets 1100 Daniel J. Howard, New Mexico State University and Seth C. Britch, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, USA. Evolution in a cricket hybrid zone 1130 Discussion 1200-1330 Lunch (provided in the Conference Centre) Plenary Symposium 3: Advances and Controversies in Phase Polyphenism Research Co-chairs: Gregory Sword, Stephen Simpson and Arnold De Loof Introduction: Phase polyphenism is a type of phenotypic plasticity expressed in a number of insect groups, but most commonly associated with locusts. Phase change often comprises a suite of physiological, behavioral and morphological phenotypic changes that are mediated by changes in local population density. The biochemical, physiological and ecological mechanisms underlying the expression of phase change continue to be investigated