DOCSLIB.ORG

Road Map to Washington's Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Road Map to Washington's Future Road Map To Washington’s Future ROAD MAP TO WASHINGTON’S FUTURE Project Overview In 2015, Washington State legislators asked the William D. Ruckelshaus Center (Center) to design a process for a comprehensive and collaborative look at the Growth Management Act (GMA). To gauge support for this effort and identify an appropriate scope, the Center conducted a Pre-Assessment from October 2016 through June 2017. The Pre-Assessment consisted of a series of conversations with individuals from dozens of groups, organizations, tribal, state, and local governments. Based on input from the parties, the Center recommended a process to: (1) articulate a vision of a desired future for Washington, and (2) examine the planning framework that provides the path to reach that desired future. The growth planning framework in Washington includes the Growth Management Act, the Shoreline Management Act, the State Environmental Policy Act and other laws, institutions and policies. The Legislature responded to the pre-assessment by allocating funds to the Center for a two year project to create a “Road Map to Washington’s Future.” The budget proviso outlined a scope, schedule, and general process for the project. The purpose of the project is to articulate a vision of Washington’s desired future and identify additions, revisions, or clarifications to the state’s growth management framework of laws, institutions, and policies needed to reach that future. Project Components and Schedule Provided is a brief description of the core components of the Road Map project. Given the scope, schedule, and complexity of the project, the Center’s Project Team recognizes that these components will evolve or may need to be modified. The Project Team also recognizes it is not possible to engage every individual involved in, affected by, or interested in the growth planning framework. The Team will implement inclusive engagement including a diversity of representatives from federal, tribal, state, county, and city governments, private and non‐profit entities, advocacy organizations, associations, elected officials, underrepresented populations, and other interested parties. Individual and Group Interviews: The purpose of interviews is to identify the strengths, weaknesses, issues, and potential solutions or improvements to the growth planning framework. Multi-SectorWorkshops: In order to understand how the framework aligns with, creates barriers to, and/ or supports the desired future of the communities it is meant to serve, the Center’s project team will be conducting 26+ workshops across the state. Broad based input is needed in order for the project team to better understand what communities across the state desire for Washington’s future, what communities care about and have challenges about, and to reflect what is unique and important about different regions of the state. THE WILLIAM D.RUCKELSHAUS CENTER Sept. 2018 Road Map To Washington’s Future Elected Official Workshops: The project team will conduct an additional 26+ workshops across the state for elected officials, in order to understand how the framework aligns with, creates barriers to, and/or supports the desired future of their communities. Regional/State-Wide Groups Workshops: As time and resources allow, the Project Team will conduct workshops for regional/state-wide groups and associations, including the Washington State Association of Counties and the Association of Washington Cities. Research: Throughout the project, and during interviews and workshops, the project team will be looking to identify pertinent data needs and partnering with state public universities on targeted research. The Team will also review pertinent independent studies, as appropriate, from other entities. Next Generation: Understanding what the next generation of Washingtonians (young adults) desire for the future, and the values that underlie that future, is an essential component of the project and will complement the workshops. The Project Team is working with university partners to create a project for students to design and implement the engagement strategy to solicit the ideas and opinions of the next generation of Washingtonians in defining that future vision. Potential Group Convening: A potential component of the project is a convening of key parties to explore areas of agreement on additions, revisions, or clarifications to the state’s growth planning framework. Whether, and how the convening process will be crafted and conducted will be based on preliminary findings from the interviews and workshops. Final Report: The Center will submit a final report to committees of the Legislature by June 30, 2019. For more information, contact: Joseph Tovar Amanda Murphy Affiliate Faculty, College of Built Environments, UW Sr. Project Lead, The William D. Ruckelshaus Center Adjunct Faculty, WSU Extension Extension Assistant Professor, WSU Extension Tel: 425.263.2792 Email: [email protected] Tel: 206-219-2409 Email: [email protected] The William D. Ruckelshaus Center is a neutral resource for collaborative problem solving in the State of Washington and the Pacific Northwest, dedicated to assisting public, private, tribal, non-profit, and other community leaders in their efforts to build consensus and resolve conflicts around difficult public policy issues. It is a joint effort of Washington State University hosted and administered by WSU Extension and the University of Washington hosted by the Daniel J. Evans School of Public Policy and Governance. For more information visit www.ruckelshauscenter.wsu.edu Growth Management Act – RCW 36.70A Growth Planning Framework Shoreline Management Act – RCW 90.58 State Environmental Policy Act –RCW 43.21C Local Project Review Act – RCW 36.70B REVISED CODE OF Land Use Petition Act – RCW 36.70C WASHINGTON Planning Enabling Act – RCW 36.70 Subdivision Statute – RCW 58.17 Water System Coordination Act – RCW 70.116 Regional Transportation Planning – RCW 47.80 City and County Governance – RCW 35, 35A, 36 OTHER PLANNING LAWS Port Districts – RCW 53 School Districts RCW 28 GOVERNANCE & INSTITUTIONS Water and Sewer Districts – RCW 57 Energy Facilities Siting Board – RCW 80.50 REVENUE AUTHORITY State Agencies and Universities STATE CONSTITUTION Community Redevelopment Financing- RCW 39.89 U.S. CONSTITUTION FEDERAL LAW, LANDS & AGENCIES Multi-Family Property Tax Exemption – RCW 84.14 TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS Impact Fees - RCW 82.02 THE ROAD MAP TO WILLIAM D.RUCKELSHAUS CENTER WASHINGTON’S FUTURE September 2018 DATA INVENTORY The Project Team is working with university partners to compile, and review pertinent data and independent studies. For example, students have looked at how vision statements in comprehensive plans correspond to the Growth Management Act’s 14 planning goals, and the experience in seven counties with the provisions with Local Areas of More Intensive Rural Development. MULTI-SECTOR WORKSHOPS The team is conducting workshops in 26 locations across the state to better understand what people desire for the future of their state and regions and what’s needed to reach that future. As of September 2018, the team has convened 18 multi- PROJECT UPDATE sector workshops in 16 locations, with well over six hundred participants. Washington State legislators allocated funds to the William D. ELECTED OFFICIAL WORKSHOPS Ruckelshaus Center and outlined a scope, schedule, and general process The team has also conducted 17 workshops for federal, tribal, state, and local for “A Road Map to Washington’s elected officials across the state to understand how the framework aligns with, Future.” The purpose is to articulate a creates barriers to, and/or supports the desired future of their communities. vision of Washington’s desired future and identify additions, revisions, or INTERVIEWS clarifications to the state’s growth management framework needed to Interviews are being held with representatives of environmental, business, real reach that future. estate and building industry organizations, local government associations, state agencies, tribal governments, public health and planning organizations, Information Gathering in 2018 transportation, business, and economic development advocacy groups. In order to understand how the framework aligns with, creates barriers to, and/or supports the REGIONAL & STATE-WIDE GROUPS desired future of the communities it As time and resources allow, the team is conducting workshops for regional is meant to serve, the Project Team and state-wide groups. So far the team has convened workshops for the has been traveling across the state Association of Washington Cities, the Washington State Association of Counties, gathering information and talking the Washington State Department of Transportation, the Governor’s Affordable with individuals and representatives Housing Advisory Board, and other state agencies. of entities with a role, interest, or knowledge of the planning NEXT GENERATION framework. The project team is working with university students who are designing an engagement strategy to solicit the ideas and opinions of the next generation of Washingtonians (generally 18 to 35 year-olds). ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE Recognizing that not everyone can attend a workshop or feels represented by one of the groups being interviewed, the team has made available an online questionnaire. So far, more than 300 people have provide their answers to the same questions posed at the workshops. Road Map To Washington’s Future 2019 Timeline January 2019 INFORMATION ANALYSIS The project team
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Primary Election Results
    Primary Election, September 14, 2004 Page 1 of 13 FINAL OFFICIAL ELECTION RESULTS Results will be posted to this site beginning at 8:00 PM on Tuesday, September 14, 2004 Reporting Schedule: Election night results will be posted at 8:00 PM election night Interim results will be posted at 5:00 PM on Friday, September 17, 2004. Complete Results will be posted at 5:00 PM on Thursday, September 23, 2004 ** The above schedule is subject to change ** This page will refresh automatically every 5 minutes Primary Election September 14, 2004 Summary Report Snohomish County Final Official Election Report PARTY TURNOUT Democratic 79340 Republican 48342 Libertarian 1981 Registration & Turnout 330,558 Voters ElectionDay Turnout 35,902 10.86% Absentee Turnout 114,062 34.51% Total ... 149,964 45.37% D - US SENATOR 698/698 100.00% Warren E. Hanson 5,546 7.13% Patty Murray 70,956 91.18% Mohammad H. Said 1,257 1.62% Write-In 58 0.07% Total ... 77,817 100.00% D - US REPRESENTATIVE DIST 1 352/352 100.00% Jay Inslee 38,425 99.44% Write-In 215 0.56% Total ... 38,640 100.00% D - US REPRESENTATIVE DIST 2 346/346 100.00% Rick Larsen 33,909 99.42% Write-In 199 0.58% Total ... 34,108 100.00% D - GOVERNOR 698/698 100.00% Mike The Mover 1,965 2.52% Ron Sims 20,810 26.71% file://C:\Web%20Edit%20Folder\ecurrent.htm 11/15/2004 Primary Election, September 14, 2004 Page 2 of 13 Eugen Buculei 722 0.93% Don Hansler 925 1.19% Scott Headland 638 0.82% Christine Gregoire 52,670 67.59% Write-In 192 0.25% Total ..
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet
    Pierce County Official Local Voters’ Pamphlet Primary Election | August 16, 2011 "I am an American" Day observance, May, 1941, Jason Lee Middle School. Sponsored by the Tacoma Americanization Council. We're bringing back an old tradition. Published by the Pierce County Auditor's Offi ce piercecountywa.org/elections 253-798-VOTE (8683) or 1-800-446-4979 Message from the Auditor Dear Voter, If there is anything predictable about elections, it is change. Every year, something new is introduced. Budget reductions, new laws, fresh regulation…you name it. We take it in stride. Election year 2011 is no exception. Plenty has changed. • Vote-By-Mail is now the law of the land. Pierce County can no longer conduct polling place elections. • Our aging Express Booths have been retired. • We now have 23 Ballot Deposit Sites throughout the County. • Five new Voting Centers will be opened across the County. • “I Voted” stickers are back! Vote-By-Mail For 17% of Pierce County’s voters, this is a big change. Instead of driving to a polling place, a ballot will be mailed to your home. Simply apply a stamp and mail your ballot before August 16th. Or, drop it off at any one of our 25 Ballot Deposit Sites or six Voting Centers. Locations are on pages 8 - 10 of this booklet. Express Booths In 2010, we began the process of retiring our staffed Express Booths. In 2011, Express Booths have gone away entirely. It's expensive to staff these booths, move them, and store them. And, the booths were breaking down after nearly two decades of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Pbs' "To the Contrary"
    PBS' "TO THE CONTRARY" HOST: BONNIE ERBE GUESTS: DELEGATE ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON (D-DC) KAREN CZARNECKI MEGAN BEYER LESLIE CHAVEZ SUNDAY, MARCH 6, 2004 PLEASE CREDIT ANY QUOTES OR EXCERPTS FROM THIS PBS PROGRAM TO "PBS' TO THE CONTRARY." TRANSCRIPT BY: FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE 1000 VERMONT AVENUE, NORTHWEST WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4903 FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE IS A PRIVATE FIRM AND IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. COPYRIGHT 2005 BY FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC., WASHINGTON, DC, 20036, USA. NO PORTION OF THIS TRANSCRIPT MAY BE COPIED, SOLD, OR RETRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. TO RECEIVE STATE, WHITE HOUSE, DEFENSE, BACKGROUND AND OTHER BRIEFINGS AND SPEECHES BY WIRE SOON AFTER THEY END, PLEASE CALL CORTES RANDELL AT 202-347-1400. COPYRIGHT IS NOT CLAIMED AS TO ANY PART OF THE ORIGINAL WORK PREPARED BY A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AS A PART OF THAT PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES. ------------------------- .STX MS. ERBE: Privacy rights experts say if Kansas Attorney General Phil Kline gains access to the records of women and girls who had late-term abortions there, no American's medical records are safe. Are they right? DELEGATE NORTON: Our system gives extraordinary powers to prosecutors. In return, they must leave zealotry behind. MS. CZARNECKI: They are like the boy who cried wolf. Medical records are readily accessible to prying eyes due to modern technology like Internet, faxes and e- mails. MS. BEYER: Big brother rifling through our medical records, yes, I think they're right. MS. SANCHEZ: The thought of prosecutors looking through our personal records, I agree, can be chilling.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Report to the Community
    CSF Scholars Kristopher, Terrell, Samantha & Charise celebrate graduation July 2018 Report to the Community Wealthy students are 5x more likely to graduate from college than low-income students.1 This staggering disparity fuels our passion to foster educational equity, making college accessible and affordable to underserved students – those from low-income families, foster youth, students of color and first-generation college students. 1The Pell Institute’s “Indicators of Higher Education Equity in the United States” (2018) College Prep Advisor Brian celebrates graduation with CSF 2 Scholar David Our Mission We provide a unique integrated system of supports and scholarships to inspire underserved, low-income students to finish high school, graduate from college and succeed in life. CSF Scholar London Our Vision A nation where all students, regardless of race, We do everything in ethnicity, socioeconomic status or familial educational our power to help our achievement, have equal opportunities to access and complete a postsecondary education. students succeed! A higher educational landscape where low-income 62% of CSF Scholars and first-generation students, foster youth and other vulnerable student populations attend, persist and graduate from college. graduate from college at least on par with their higher- income counterparts. 9,500 college A world where cycles of intergenerational poverty are graduates strong… interrupted and ultimately broken, as a result of the educational attainment levels and postsecondary and counting! professional accomplishments of low-income and first-generation students and other vulnerable student populations impacted by our work. Join us in changing lives through education! 3 Who We Serve College Success Foundation serves a very vulnerable student population.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.7.14 Plaintiff-Respondents' Response to Motions for Leave To
    NO. 84362-7 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MATHEW & STEPHANIE MCCLEARY, on their own behalf and on behalf of KELSEY & CARTER MCCLEARY, their two children in Washington’s public schools, et al., Plaintiff/Respondents, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENTS’ v. RESPONSE TO MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AMICI CURIAE BRIEFS Defendant/Appellant. On August 4, 2014, four groups of applicants filed motions for leave to file amici curiae briefs regarding the upcoming September 3 show cause hearing: (1) Washington State Budget and Policy Center, Centerstone, the ElderCare Alliance, the Equity in Education Coalition, Statewide Poverty Action Network, Solid Ground, Jennifer Papest, Kristin Lindenmuth, Patrick Lenning, and Viral Shaw; (2) Columbia Legal Services, The Children’s Alliance, and The Washington Low Income Housing Alliance; (3) Superintendent of Public Instruction Randy Dorn; and (4) Former Governors Daniel J. Evans, John Spellman, Mike Lowry, Gary Locke, and Christine Gregoire. Plaintiffs file this single, consolidated response to those four motions. As a procedural matter, plaintiffs object that these amicus brief motions do not satisfy the requirements of RAP 10.6.1 1 RAP 10.6(a) permits an amicus brief “only if all parties consent or if the filing of the brief would assist the appellate court.” To that end, the rule requires the applicant’s motion to establish: (1) the applicant’s interest and the person or group the applicant represents; (2) the applicant’s familiarity with the issues involved in the review and with - 1 - 51388129.3 But as a practical matter, since this Court recently granted Mr. Eugster’s amicus brief motion over plaintiffs’ similar objection, plaintiffs recognize this Court will likely grant these four amicus brief motions for the September 3 show cause hearing as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Agreement State Governors Re: NRC Has Approved Increased
    September 2, 2005 The Honorable Janet Napolitano Governor of the State of Arizona 1700 West Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Dear Governor Napolitano: In cooperation with the State of Arizona, and the 32 other Agreement States, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has approved increased controls for radioactive material licensees possessing radioactive sources containing quantities of concern. When implemented by licensees, these controls, which supplement existing regulatory requirements, will provide both the NRC and the Agreement States reasonable assurance that our common objectives of enhancing controls over certain radioactive sources and protecting public health and safety continue to be met. This approach comports with existing Agreements under Section 274b of the Atomic Energy Act for protection of public health and safety. The additional requirements will ensure increased control of radioactive sources containing quantities of concern, and they are consistent with ongoing national and international efforts to address the potentially significant health and safety hazards that could be posed by a loss of control of such radioactive sources. This approach to issuing the increased controls will maximize the effectiveness and efficiency of NRC and Agreement State inspection resources and reduce travel and other administrative costs, since safety and control requirements will be inspected in an integrated manner primarily during routine health and safety inspections or commensurate with an inspection prioritization scheme. Implementation of these requirements is a matter of great importance to the NRC and to the Nation. In September 2005, the NRC requested, through the radiation control program director in each Agreement State, that all Agreement States impose the increased controls on their licensees by December 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Remarks at the National
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Remarks at the National Governors Association Dinner February 27, 2011 Well, good evening, everybody. Welcome to the White House. I want to start by acknowledging your outstanding chair, Christine Gregoire, for her wonderful work, and your vice chair, Dave Heineman, for his wonderful work. Thank you very much. I want to welcome some of you back, and I want to welcome those who are here for the first time. I know some of you may be confused and think this is the Oscars. [Laughter] There are some similarities. First of all, everybody looks spectacular. And the second thing is, if I speak too long, the music will start playing. [Laughter] So I'm going to be very brief. I know that the last couple of years have not been easy in a lot of your States. People have been struggling. Folks have lost jobs. Businesses have shuttered. We went through the toughest recession since the Great Depression. And nobody has felt it more than folks back home, and you see it each and every day. You have to respond in ways that go beyond just ideology or rhetoric. The thing about Governors is you're in charge and people know where to find you and they expect you to help them during tough times. And many of you over the last 2 years have done extraordinary work. Many of you are expected for the next 2 years, next 4 years, or however long it may be, to do extraordinary work. The main message I want to deliver tonight, in addition to asking you to have some fun this evening, is to know that you've got a partner here in the White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Expenditures and Electioneering Communications
    2008 Election Financing Fact Book Compiled by Washington State Public Disclosure Commission Olympia, Washington Suemary Trobaugh, Editor The Public Disclosure Commission’s office is located at: 711 Capitol Way, Room (206) Olympia WA 98504 (360) 753-1111 - Fax: (360) 753-1112 www.pdc.wa.gov FOREWORD The 2008 Election Financing Fact Book is the sixteenth in a series of comparable biennial reports produced since 1978 by the Washington Sate Public Disclosure Commission, pursuant to the Commission’s authority in RCW 42.17.370(3) to publish reports and statistics concerning campaign finance so that the information may be fully disclosed to the public. This Fact Book also depicts the political finance activity of the ninth regular legislative election held following the implementation of Initiative 134. Material in this book is based on campaign finance reports filed by candidates and political committees disclosing activity through January 12, 2009. For the most part, these reports have not been audited by PDC staff. Every effort has been made to assure that the data as well as the summary charts and graphs accurately reflect the filed information. The total expenditures by legislative candidates, who reported spending money, are summarized as follows: In 1994, 316 candidates spent $10,516,508 In 1996, 313 candidates spent $13,064,270 In 1998, 267 candidates spent $12,994,043 In 2000, 303 candidates spent $16,257,511 In 2002, 258 candidates spent $15,847,338 In 2004, 257 candidates spent $18,904,376 In 2006, 216 candidates spent $18,850,341 In 2008, 244 candidates spent $21,306,132 From 2004 to 2008 the average expenditure by major party general election legislative candidates with opposition increased approximately 4% from $97,124 to $100,915*.
    [Show full text]
  • George W. Bush Signed Last Year
    November 2004 751 AERO MECHANIC Page VOL. 58 NO. 9 NOVEMBER 2004 How and Why Kerry/Edwards - Workers’ Best Choice America’s working families look to a We Endorse President for leadership, vision and poli- Union leadership recognizes our 751 cies that will benefit and improve their membership is an independent group - work and families’ lives. with nearly one-third Democrats, one- An examination of Democratic Presi- third Republicans and one-third Indepen- dential candidate Senator John Kerry’s dents. Keeping that in mind, when the (D-Mass) 20-year record in the U.S Sen- Union makes an endorsement, we base ate reveals a leader who earned a 91 our decision on where the candidate stands percent lifetime AFL-CIO voting record on issues important to workers. We en- on such important working families is- dorse candidates who have supported our sues as jobs, health care, worker safety, efforts. Our Legislative Committee, com- education and civil rights. prised of shop floor members, interviews When you look at workers’ issues, and examines records of the candidates Kerry has the right plan. Kerry cares about before making a recommendation. leveling the playing field with Airbus and While we are non-partisan, Democrats even mentioned it in the recent debates. tend to sympathize with workers more He understands we must stop the and Republicans side more with busi- outsourcing of American jobs and pledged ness. All our endorsements are based on to provide incentives for companies that Photo courtesy of Kerry-Edwards 2004, Inc from Sharon Farmer how these individuals have supported us create jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democrat News
    WorkSource for Veterans and Military Families By Debby Pattin priority for service through ESD. Chair of 22nd LD Democrats Incentives are provided to local employers to encourage them to hire veterans, and a Work- ith so many thou- Source Center can be found in sands of active duty Tumwater. Additional WorkSource military, military fami- W Centers are in cities in neighbor- lies, and veterans living here in ing counties, and include Chehalis, Thurston County, the topic of job Aberdeen, Shelton, Tacoma and placement and retraining of veter- Lakewood. Additional outstations ans – and their spouses – is sig- are located in neighboring county nificant to our local economy and locations including Belfair, Ray- the quality of life in our county. mond, Long Beach, at the JBLM At the March 25th meeting of and American Lake. the 22nd Legislative District Demo- emphasis WorkSource is putting case managers who coordinate Coordination with registered WorkSource provides the crats, we had the honor of hearing on transferable skills and cre- a variety of services. Spouses of apprenticeships in the building largest inventory of jobs within a presentation from Todd Dixon, dentialing so that when service veterans who are 100% disabled trades, through programs such Washington State, with an on line Manager, and Michael Hester, members leave the military, the can also partake in the “Heroes as Helmets to Hardhats help vet- registration for Job Hunter work- Veterans Employment Represen- skills and training they gained in at Home’ program for college, job erans transition into good, family shops, and provides free online tative, from the Washington State the military can be put to use in training, job placement, and the wage jobs, and oftentimes union computer training on all Microsoft Employment Security Depart- the civilian job market with the on site Stone Education Center at jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007-2026 Washington Transportation Plan (WTP)
    Washington Transportation Plan 2007 - 2026 Washington’s transportation system should serve our citizens’ safety and mobility, the state’s economic productivity, our communities’ livability and our ecosystem’s viability. Washington State Transportation Commission From left to right: Bob Distler*, San Juan County; Elmira Forner, Vice Chair, Chelan County; Richard Ford, Chair, King County; Reema Griffi th, Executive Director; Dale Stedman*,WTP Team Leader, Spokane County; Edward Barnes, Clark County; Dan O’Neal*, Mason County; and Carol Moser*, Benton County. * Washington Transportation Plan Team Member Douglas B. MacDonald, Secretary of Transportation Paula J. Hammond, P.E., Chief of Staff WSDOT ensures full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by prohibiting discrimination against any person on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the provision of benefi ts and services result- ing from its federally assisted programs and activities. For questions regard- ing WSDOT’s Title VI Program, you may contact the Department’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7098. Materials can be provided in alternative formats: large print, Braille, cassette tape, or on computer disk for people with disabilities by calling the Offi ce of Equal Opportunity (OEO) at (360) 705-7097. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact OEO through the Washington Relay Service at 7-1-1. STATE OF WASHINGTON TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Transportation Building, PO Box 47308, Olympia, Washington 98504-7308 • (360) 705-7070 Fax: (360) 705-6802 • E-Mail: [email protected] • http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/commission November 14, 2006 The Honorable Christine Gregoire Office of the Governor PO Box 40002 Olympia, WA 98504-0002 The Honorable Members Washington State Senate PO Box 40482 Olympia, WA 98504-0482 The Honorable Members Washington State House of Representatives PO Box 40600 Olympia, WA 98504-0600 Dear Governor Gregoire, Senators, and Representatives: The Transportation Commission is pleased to present the newly updated 2007-2026 Washington Transportation Plan (WTP).
    [Show full text]
  • PP Dec06 Final.P65
    A W A R E N E S S E D U C A T I O N C A R E PARKINSON’S A P U B L I C A T I O N O F T H E N O R T H W E S T P A R K I N S O N ’ S F O U N D A T I O N Post N O V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2 0 0 6 INSIDE Exercise as medicine | 2 Express yourself | 3 The partnership key | 4 Monique Giroux, M.D., former medical Ed Ewell honored | 5 director at the Booth Gardner Parkinson’s PD creativity featured online | 6 Care Center in Kirkland, WA, speaks on new Thank you, donors | 7 and novel treatments at the Governors’ Conference on Parkinson’s A B O U T U S Nov. 18 in Seattle. Gail Howard photo Parkinson’s Post is published by the Northwest Parkinson’s Foundation, a Conference brings together 501(c)(3) charitable organization. 650 united in Parkinson’s fight Our mission is to establish optimal quality of life By Joanna Glickler for a cure. She said the 2005 establishment A crowd of 650 Parkinson’s patients, of the Life Sciences Discovery Fund for the Northwest caregivers, friends, clinicians, researchers, through Washington’s share of tobacco Parkinson’s community. advocates and others joined together for settlement revenue positions the state to be the first Governors’ Conference on Parkinson’s, a leader in the quest for treatments and We welcome comments and a partnership of the Northwest Parkinson’s cures for diseases like Parkinson’s.
    [Show full text]