DOCSLIB.ORG

Enabling Exploration with Small Radioisotope Power Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enabling Exploration with Small Radioisotope Power Systems JPL Pub 04-10 Enabling Exploration with Small Radioisotope Power Systems Requested by George R. Schmidt NASA Office of Space Science Written by Robert D. Abelson (Editor) JPL/Caltech Tibor S. Balint JPL/Caltech Kathryn E. Marshall JPL/Caltech Heros Noravian Analytix/DOE James E. Randolph JPL/Caltech Celeste M. Satter JPL/Caltech George R. Schmidt NASA HQ James H. Shirley JPL/Caltech September 2004 GSFC Prepared by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology and the U.S. Department of Energy through an agreement with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement by the United States Government, the U.S. Department of Energy, or the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. SMALL RPS CONCEPTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 1. Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Results .......................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Conclusions .................................................................................................................. 1-8 2. Mission Concepts and Applications ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Introduction and Description of the Mission Categories.............................................. 2-1 2.3 Lander Missions ........................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.1 Europa Lander Mission....................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.2 Additional RPS-Enabled Lander Missions ....................................................... 2-15 2.3.3 Summary and Conclusions ............................................................................... 2-16 2.4 Rover Missions .......................................................................................................... 2-17 2.4.1 Mars Rover Mission.......................................................................................... 2-17 2.4.2 Lunar Rover Mission ........................................................................................ 2-29 2.4.3 Conclusions of Rover Mission Studies............................................................. 2-43 2.5 Subsatellite Missions.................................................................................................. 2-46 2.5.1 Galilean Satellite Orbiter Mission .................................................................... 2-46 2.5.2 Additional RPS-Enabled Subsatellite Missions ................................................ 2-58 2.5.3 Summary and Conclusions .............................................................................. 2-58 2.6 Deployable Mini-Payload Applications ..................................................................... 2-59 2.6.1 Seismic Monitoring Stations............................................................................. 2-59 2.6.2 Passive Fields and Particles Monitoring Station............................................... 2-64 2.6.3 Summary and Conclusions ............................................................................... 2-66 2.7 Mission Studies Summary.......................................................................................... 2-68 3. Power Conversion Technologies for Small-RPS Systems ................................................... 3-1 3.1 Thermoelectrics ............................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Stirling .......................................................................................................................... 3-2 4. Small-RPS Concepts ............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Hi-Z Milliwatt RPS Concept........................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 JPL/Swales Milliwatt RPS Concept ............................................................................. 4-1 4.3 ARC Milliwatt RPS Concept........................................................................................ 4-2 4.4 BIAPOS Milliwatt RPS Concept.................................................................................. 4-3 4.5 DOE/OSC RPS Concepts............................................................................................. 4-3 4.5.1 GPHS-Based RPS Concepts ............................................................................... 4-4 4.5.2 RHU-Based RPS Concepts (40 mWe) ................................................................ 4-7 4.5.3 RHU-Based RPS Concept (160 mWe) ............................................................. 4-10 4.6 Small-RPS Concepts Summary.................................................................................. 4-11 5. Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 5-1 6. References ............................................................................................................................. 6-1 7. Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................... 7-1 i The information contained within this document is predecisional and for discussion purposes only. TABLE OF CONTENTS SMALL RPS CONCEPTS ii The information contained within this document is predecisional and for discussion purposes only. SMALL RPS CONCEPTS LIST OF FIGURES List of Figures Figure 1-1. Classes of Small-RPS Dictated by Available Pu-238 Heat Sources .................. 1-4 Figure 2.3.1-1. Europa’s Predicted Internal Structure and Composition ................................... 2-2 Figure 2.3.1-2. Configuration of the Europa Lander Mission (ELM) Surface Lander [7] ......... 2-3 Figure 2.3.1-3. Artist’s Concept of the ELM Spacecraft Riding the Aft Section of the JIMO Mothership (Preliminary Version) During the Cruise Phase ........ 2-3 Figure 2.3.1-4. Orbital Maneuvers Performed by the ELM Spacecraft During the Entry and Landing Phases ............................................................... 2-4 Figure 2.3.1-5. Illustrations of the separation, orbital-insertion, airbag deployment and landing phases of the Europa Lander Mission (ELM) spacecraft [7]. ........ 2-4 Figure 2.3.1-6. Incident Solar Flux at Surface of Europa at 45° Latitude Over 30 Earth Days ...................................................... 2-5 Figure 2.3.1-7. (a) Small-RPS (with Top Removed) and (b) ELM Spacecraft with Small-RPS Installed (Radiator panels and internal systems removed for clarity.) .............. 2-7 Figure 2.3.1-8. Communications Event Between ELM (at 45° latitude) and JIMO .................. 2-9 Figure 2.3.1-9. Elevation Line of Site (LOS) Angle between ELM and JIMO as a Function of Latitude and Time ....................................................... 2-10 Figure 2.3.1-10.ELM Power Requirements (Peak and Average) for Each Operating Mode ... 2-12 Figure 2.3.1-11.Natural Radiation Dose (4-Pi) Received by the JIMO Spacecraft Versus Shielding Thickness [15] ................................................... 2-14 Figure 2.3.1-12.Lifetime (13-year) Radiation Dose Generated by a GPHS Module Versus Distance [16] ............................................................... 2-14 Figure 2.4.1-1. Mars: Future Destination for Manned Space Exploration ............................... 2-17 Figure 2.4.1-2. MER-type Airbag without the Aeroshell ......................................................... 2-18 Figure 2.4.1-3. Viking-type Aeroshell, Lander, and Rover ...................................................... 2-18 Figure 2.4.1-4. Mars Rover Configuration (top removed to show internal systems) ............... 2-19 Figure 2.4.1-5. Operating Performance of a Mars Rover as a Function of Landing Location . 2-20 Figure 2.4.1-6. Conceptual Small-RPS for the Mars Rover Using a Single GPHS Module ... 2-21 Figure 2.4.1-7. Mars Rover Instrumentation Configuration and Layout ................................. 2-22 Figure 2.4.1-8. Thermal Design Concept for an RPS-enabled Mars Rover ............................. 2-23 Figure 2.4.1-9. Sojourner and the Rock Named Yogi .............................................................. 2-24 Figure 2.4.1-10.Design Concept View of the Mars Rover Wheels and the RPSs ................... 2-24 Figure 2.4.1-11.Radiation environment for two RPS mission concept configurations of the Mars Rover: (a) end-to-end configuration and (b) side-by-side configuration; dotted line represents area in radiation plots. ........................... 2-27 Figure 2.4.2-1. The Moon—Possible Source of Water Ice for Support of a Permanent Human Presence. .................................................................... 2-29 Figure 2.4.2-2. Lunar Rover Descent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Geology of the Rocky Bodies Inside Enceladus, Europa, Titan, and Ganymede
    49th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2018 (LPI Contrib. No. 2083) 2905.pdf THE GEOLOGY OF THE ROCKY BODIES INSIDE ENCELADUS, EUROPA, TITAN, AND GANYMEDE. Paul K. Byrne1, Paul V. Regensburger1, Christian Klimczak2, DelWayne R. Bohnenstiehl1, Steven A. Hauck, II3, Andrew J. Dombard4, and Douglas J. Hemingway5, 1Planetary Research Group, Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA ([email protected]), 2Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA, 3Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA, 4Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA, 5Department of Earth & Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Introduction: The icy satellites of Jupiter and horizontal stresses, respectively, Pp is pore fluid Saturn have been the subjects of substantial geological pressure (found from (3)), and μ is the coefficient of study. Much of this work has focused on their outer friction [12]. Finally, because equations (4) and (5) shells [e.g., 1–3], because that is the part most readily assess failure in the brittle domain, we also considered amenable to analysis. Yet many of these satellites ductile deformation with the relation n –E/RT feature known or suspected subsurface oceans [e.g., 4– ε̇ = C1σ exp , (6) 6], likely situated atop rocky interiors [e.g., 7], and where ε̇ is strain rate, C1 is a constant, σ is deviatoric several are of considerable astrobiological significance. stress, n is the stress exponent, E is activation energy, R For example, chemical reactions at the rock–water is the universal gas constant, and T is temperature [13].
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 330 HW 2 Presentations Outline
    Astronomy 330 HW 2 •! Stanley Swat This class (Lecture 12): http://www.ufohowto.com/ Life in the Solar System •! Lucas Guthrie Next Class: http://www.crystalinks.com/abduction.html Life in the Solar System HW 5 is due Wednesday Music: We Are All Made of Stars– Moby Presentations Outline •! Daniel Borup •! Life on Venus? Futurama •! Life on Mars? Life in the Solar System? Earth – Venus comparison •! We want to examine in more detail the backyard of humans. •! What we find may change our estimates of ne. Radius 0.95 Earth Surface gravity 0.91 Earth Venus is the hottest Mass 0.81 Earth planet, the closest in Distance from Sun 0.72 AU size to Earth, the closest Average Temp 475 C in distance to Earth, and Year 224.7 Earth days the planet with the Length of Day 116.8 Earth days longest day. Atmosphere 96% CO2 What We Used to Think Turns Out that Venus is Hell Venus must be hotter, as it is closer the Sun, but the cloud •! The surface is hot enough to melt lead cover must reflect back a large amount of the heat. •! There is a runaway greenhouse effect •! There is almost no water In 1918, a Swedish chemist and Nobel laureate concluded: •! There is sulfuric acid rain •! Everything on Venus is dripping wet. •! Most of the surface is no doubt covered with swamps. •! Not a place to visit for Spring Break. •! The constantly uniform climatic conditions result in an entire absence of adaptation to changing exterior conditions. •! Only low forms of life are therefore represented, mostly no doubt, belonging to the vegetable kingdom; and the organisms are nearly of the same kind all over the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Exomoon Habitability Constrained by Illumination and Tidal Heating
    submitted to Astrobiology: April 6, 2012 accepted by Astrobiology: September 8, 2012 published in Astrobiology: January 24, 2013 this updated draft: October 30, 2013 doi:10.1089/ast.2012.0859 Exomoon habitability constrained by illumination and tidal heating René HellerI , Rory BarnesII,III I Leibniz-Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany, [email protected] II Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 951580, Seattle, WA 98195, [email protected] III NASA Astrobiology Institute – Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA Abstract The detection of moons orbiting extrasolar planets (“exomoons”) has now become feasible. Once they are discovered in the circumstellar habitable zone, questions about their habitability will emerge. Exomoons are likely to be tidally locked to their planet and hence experience days much shorter than their orbital period around the star and have seasons, all of which works in favor of habitability. These satellites can receive more illumination per area than their host planets, as the planet reflects stellar light and emits thermal photons. On the contrary, eclipses can significantly alter local climates on exomoons by reducing stellar illumination. In addition to radiative heating, tidal heating can be very large on exomoons, possibly even large enough for sterilization. We identify combinations of physical and orbital parameters for which radiative and tidal heating are strong enough to trigger a runaway greenhouse. By analogy with the circumstellar habitable zone, these constraints define a circumplanetary “habitable edge”. We apply our model to hypothetical moons around the recently discovered exoplanet Kepler-22b and the giant planet candidate KOI211.01 and describe, for the first time, the orbits of habitable exomoons.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Low-Altitude Martian Orbits Using Frequency Analysis A
    Design of Low-Altitude Martian Orbits using Frequency Analysis A. Noullez, K. Tsiganis To cite this version: A. Noullez, K. Tsiganis. Design of Low-Altitude Martian Orbits using Frequency Analysis. Advances in Space Research, Elsevier, 2021, 67, pp.477-495. 10.1016/j.asr.2020.10.032. hal-03007909 HAL Id: hal-03007909 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03007909 Submitted on 16 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Design of Low-Altitude Martian Orbits using Frequency Analysis A. Noulleza,∗, K. Tsiganisb aUniversit´eC^oted'Azur, Observatoire de la C^oted'Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, bd. de l'Observatoire, C.S. 34229, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France bSection of Astrophysics Astronomy & Mechanics, Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece Abstract Nearly-circular Frozen Orbits (FOs) around axisymmetric bodies | or, quasi-circular Periodic Orbits (POs) around non-axisymmetric bodies | are of primary concern in the design of low-altitude survey missions. Here, we study very low-altitude orbits (down to 50 km) in a high-degree and order model of the Martian gravity field. We apply Prony's Frequency Analysis (FA) to characterize the time variation of their orbital elements by computing accurate quasi-periodic decompositions of the eccentricity and inclination vectors.
    [Show full text]
  • JUICE Red Book
    ESA/SRE(2014)1 September 2014 JUICE JUpiter ICy moons Explorer Exploring the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Definition Study Report European Space Agency 1 This page left intentionally blank 2 Mission Description Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer Key science goals The emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Characterise Ganymede, Europa and Callisto as planetary objects and potential habitats Explore the Jupiter system as an archetype for gas giants Payload Ten instruments Laser Altimeter Radio Science Experiment Ice Penetrating Radar Visible-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Imaging System Magnetometer Particle Package Submillimetre Wave Instrument Radio and Plasma Wave Instrument Overall mission profile 06/2022 - Launch by Ariane-5 ECA + EVEE Cruise 01/2030 - Jupiter orbit insertion Jupiter tour Transfer to Callisto (11 months) Europa phase: 2 Europa and 3 Callisto flybys (1 month) Jupiter High Latitude Phase: 9 Callisto flybys (9 months) Transfer to Ganymede (11 months) 09/2032 – Ganymede orbit insertion Ganymede tour Elliptical and high altitude circular phases (5 months) Low altitude (500 km) circular orbit (4 months) 06/2033 – End of nominal mission Spacecraft 3-axis stabilised Power: solar panels: ~900 W HGA: ~3 m, body fixed X and Ka bands Downlink ≥ 1.4 Gbit/day High Δv capability (2700 m/s) Radiation tolerance: 50 krad at equipment level Dry mass: ~1800 kg Ground TM stations ESTRAC network Key mission drivers Radiation tolerance and technology Power budget and solar arrays challenges Mass budget Responsibilities ESA: manufacturing, launch, operations of the spacecraft and data archiving PI Teams: science payload provision, operations, and data analysis 3 Foreword The JUICE (JUpiter ICy moon Explorer) mission, selected by ESA in May 2012 to be the first large mission within the Cosmic Vision Program 2015–2025, will provide the most comprehensive exploration to date of the Jovian system in all its complexity, with particular emphasis on Ganymede as a planetary body and potential habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • First Stop on the Interstellar Journey: the Solar Gravity Lens Focus
    1 DRAFT 16 May 2017 First Stop on the Interstellar Journey: The Solar Gravity Lens Focus Louis Friedman *1, Slava G. Turyshev2 1 Executive Director Emeritus, The Planetary Society 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Abstract Whether or not Starshoti proves practical, it has focused attention on the technologies required for practical interstellar flight. They are: external energy (not in-space propulsion), sails (to be propelled by the external energy) and ultra-light spacecraft (so that the propulsion energy provides the largest possible increase in velocity). Much development is required in all three of these areas. The spacecraft technologies, nano- spacecraft and sails, can be developed through increasingly capable spacecraft that will be able of going further and faster through the interstellar medium. The external energy source (laser power in the Starshot concept) necessary for any flight beyond the solar system (>~100,000 AU) will be developed independently of the spacecraft. The solar gravity lens focus is a line beginning at approximately 547 AU from the Sun along the line defined by the identified exo-planet and the Sunii. An image of the exo-planet requires a coronagraph and telescope on the spacecraft, and an ability for the spacecraft to move around the focal line as it flies along it. The image is created in the “Einstein Ring” and extends several kilometers around the focal line – the spacecraft will have to collect pixels by maneuvering in the imageiii. This can be done over many years as the spacecraft flies along the focal line. The magnification by the solar gravity lens is a factor of 100 billion, permitting kilometer scale resolution of an exo-planet that might be even tens of light-years distant.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Planets and Magnetic Planets and How Mars Lost Its
    Magnetic Planets and How Mars Lost Its Atmosphere Bob Lin Physics Department & Space Sciences Laboratory Universityyf of Calif ornia, Berkeley Also (visiting) School of Space Research Kyung Hee University, Korea Thanks to the MGS, MAVEN, and LP teams Earth’s Magnetic Field The Earth’s Magnetosphere Explorer 35 (1967) Lunar Shadowing Apollo 15 Mission -1971 Lunar Rover -> <- Jim Arnold's Gamma-ray Spectrometer <- Apollo 15 Subsatellite -> <= SIM (Scientific Instrument Module) Lunar Shadowing <= Downward electrons <= Upward electrons <= Ratio of Upward to DdltDownward electrons Electron Reflection Electron Trajectory Converging Magnetic Fields Secondary Electron ---- ---- - dv||RemotelydU SensingdB Surface MagneticB Fields by m + e + μ = 0⇒sin 2 α = LP []1- eΔU E Planetary Electron Reflection Magnetometryc (PERM) dt ds ds BSurf Apollo 15 & 16 Subsatellites Electron Reflectometry OneHowever, of the the great Apollo surprises 15 & 16 from Subsatellite Apollo was magnetic the discovery data set of paleomagneticis very sparse and fields confined in the lunar within crust 35 degrees. Their existence of the suggestsequator. Attempts that magnetic to correlate fields atsurface the Moon magnetic were muchfields with strongerspecific geologic in the past features than they were are largely today. unsuccessful. Mars Observer (1992-3) – disappeared 3 days before Mars orbit insertion Mars Global Surveyy(or (MGS) 1996-2006 MGS Mag/ER team Current state of knowledge • Very strong crustal fields measured from orbit: – Discovered by MGS: ~10 times stronger
    [Show full text]
  • An Impacting Descent Probe for Europa and the Other Galilean Moons of Jupiter
    An Impacting Descent Probe for Europa and the other Galilean Moons of Jupiter P. Wurz1,*, D. Lasi1, N. Thomas1, D. Piazza1, A. Galli1, M. Jutzi1, S. Barabash2, M. Wieser2, W. Magnes3, H. Lammer3, U. Auster4, L.I. Gurvits5,6, and W. Hajdas7 1) Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2) Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, 3) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria, 4) Institut f. Geophysik u. Extraterrestrische Physik, Technische Universität, Braunschweig, Germany, 5) Joint Institute for VLBI ERIC, Dwingelo, The Netherlands, 6) Department of Astrodynamics and Space Missions, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands 7) Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland. *) Corresponding author, [email protected], Tel.: +41 31 631 44 26, FAX: +41 31 631 44 05 1 Abstract We present a study of an impacting descent probe that increases the science return of spacecraft orbiting or passing an atmosphere-less planetary bodies of the solar system, such as the Galilean moons of Jupiter. The descent probe is a carry-on small spacecraft (< 100 kg), to be deployed by the mother spacecraft, that brings itself onto a collisional trajectory with the targeted planetary body in a simple manner. A possible science payload includes instruments for surface imaging, characterisation of the neutral exosphere, and magnetic field and plasma measurement near the target body down to very low-altitudes (~1 km), during the probe’s fast (~km/s) descent to the surface until impact. The science goals and the concept of operation are discussed with particular reference to Europa, including options for flying through water plumes and after-impact retrieval of very-low altitude science data.
    [Show full text]
  • Ganymede Science Questions and Future Exploration
    Planetary Science Decadal Survey Community White Paper Ganymede science questions and future exploration Geoffrey C. Collins, Wheaton College, Norton, Massachusetts [email protected] Claudia J. Alexander, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Edward B. Bierhaus, Lockheed Martin Michael T. Bland, Washington University in St. Louis Veronica J. Bray, University of Arizona John F. Cooper, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Frank Crary, Southwest Research Institute Andrew J. Dombard, University of Illinois at Chicago Olivier Grasset, University of Nantes Gary B. Hansen, University of Washington Charles A. Hibbitts, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Terry A. Hurford, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Hauke Hussmann, DLR, Berlin Krishan K. Khurana, University of California, Los Angeles Michelle R. Kirchoff, Southwest Research Institute Jean-Pierre Lebreton, European Space Agency Melissa A. McGrath, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center William B. McKinnon, Washington University in St. Louis Jeffrey M. Moore, NASA Ames Research Center Robert T. Pappalardo, Jet Propulsion Laboratory G. Wesley Patterson, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Louise M. Prockter, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Kurt Retherford, Southwest Research Institute James H. Roberts, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Paul M. Schenk, Lunar and Planetary Institute David A. Senske, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Adam P. Showman, University of Arizona Katrin Stephan, DLR, Berlin Federico Tosi, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Rome Roland J. Wagner, DLR, Berlin Introduction Ganymede is a planet-sized (larger than Mercury) moon of Jupiter with unique characteristics, such as being the largest satellite in the solar system, the most centrally condensed solid body in the solar system, and the only solid body in the outer solar system known to posses an internally generated magnetic field.
    [Show full text]
  • Projection of Meteosat Images Into World Geodetic System WGS-84 Matching Spot/Vegetation Grid
    Projection of Meteosat images into World Geodetic system WGS-84 matching Spot/Vegetation grid Bruno COMBAL, Josué NOEL EUR 23945 EN - 2009 The mission of the JRC-IES is to provide scientific-technical support to the European Union’s policies for the protection and sustainable development of the European and global environ- ment. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Contact information Address: Global Environment Monitoring Unit, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre, via E. Fermi, 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +39 03 32 78 93 78 Fax: +39 03 32 78 90 73 http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is re- sponsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC 52438 EUR 23945 EN ISBN 978-92-79-12953-7 ISSN 1018-5593 DOI 10.2788/2452 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Italy Table of contents 1 Introduction.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE A Geophysical Perspective on the Bulk Composition of Mars 10.1002/2017JE005371 A. Khan1 , C. Liebske2,A.Rozel1, A. Rivoldini3, F. Nimmo4 , J. A. D. Connolly2 , A.-C. Plesa5 , Key Points: 1 • We constrain the bulk composition and D. Giardini of Mars using geophysical data to 1 2 an Fe/Si (wt) of 1.61 =−1.67 and a Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland, Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, ETH Zürich, Zurich, molar Mg# of 0.745–0.751 Switzerland, 3Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium, 4Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University • The results indicate a large liquid core of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 5German Aerospace Center (DLR), Berlin, Germany (1,640–1,740 km in radius) containing 13.5–16 wt% S and excludes a transition to a lower mantle • We use the inversion results in Abstract We invert the Martian tidal response and mean mass and moment of inertia for chemical tandem with geodynamic simulations composition, thermal state, and interior structure. The inversion combines phase equilibrium computations to identify plausible geodynamic with a laboratory-based viscoelastic dissipation model. The rheological model, which is based on scenarios and parameters measurements of anhydrous and melt-free olivine, is both temperature and grain size sensitive and imposes strong constraints on interior structure. The bottom of the lithosphere, defined as the location Supporting Information: where the conductive geotherm meets the mantle adiabat, occurs deep within the upper mantle • Supporting Information S1 (∼200–400 km depth) resulting in apparent upper mantle low-velocity zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Juno: Extended & Expanded 29 11 42
    “Since its first orbit in 2016, Juno has delivered one revelation after another about the inner workings of this massive gas giant. With the extended mission, we will answer fundamental questions that arose during Juno’s prime mission while reaching beyond the planet to explore Mission Juno: Extended & Expanded Jupiter’s ring system and largest satellites.” by the numbers —SwRI’s Scott Bolton, Juno principal investigator “The Juno team will start tackling a breadth of science historically required of flagships. This represents an efficient and innovative advance for NASA’s solar system exploration strategy.” — Lori Glaze, Planetary Science Division Director, NASA HQ primary mission Investigate Jupiter’s origins, interior, atmosphere extended mission and magnetosphere Investigation of Jupiter’s northern hemisphere and polar cyclones, dilute core, magnetic LAUNCH: August 5, 2011 ARRIVAL: July 2016 features being sheared by Jupiter’s zonal jets; flybys of Io, Europa and Ganymede; observation PRIMARY MISSION ENDS: July 2021 of the distant boundaries of the magnetosphere; and the first exploration of Jupiter’s rings MISSION STARTS: August 2021 MISSION ENDS: September 2025 34 Science Orbits 42 Additional Orbits Flybys over the Great Blue 6 Spot, a Magnetic Enigma SPACECRAFT ST Detailed Exploration of 19 Atmospheric 1 Jupiter’s Faint Rings Occultations ST Spacecraft Equipped 1 with a Radiation Vault MOON FLYBYS Titanium Mapping of 400 ST POUND Electronics Vault 1 Europa’s Ice Shell Thickness 3 EUROPA FLYBYS 29 Science Sensors on 11 Instruments Measurement ST of Space Search for 1 GANYMEDE FLYBYS ST Weathering 2 IO FLYBYS 1 Io’s Global on an Icy Solar Panels Spanning 66 11 Magma Ocean 3 FEET Moon 18 SPRING 2021 IMAGES COURTESY NASA/JPL/DLR/JPL-CALTECH D024769.
    [Show full text]