Dyslexia Or Ld in Reading: What Is the Difference?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dyslexia Or Ld in Reading: What Is the Difference? DYSLEXIA OR LD IN READING: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE? Anise Flowers & Donna Black, Pearson Dyslexia or LD in Reading? TCASE 2017 Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in black type) or Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in white type) International Dyslexia Association Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurological in origin. It is characterized by Dyslexia or LD in Reading: What difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word is the Difference? recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language that is often unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of Presented by effective classroom instruction. Secondary Anise Flowers, Ph.D. Donna Black, LSSP consequences may include problems in reading comprehension and reduced reading experience TCASE that can impede growth of vocabulary and January 2017 background knowledge. Presentation Title Arial Bold 7 pt 1 2 Dyslexia Identification and Services in Texas Dyslexia Definition (in Texas) Texas Education Code (TEC)§38.003 defines Texas Education Code (TEC)§38.003 definition: dyslexia and mandates testing and the provision of 1. “Dyslexia” means a disorder of constitutional instruction origin manifested by a difficulty in learning to State Board of Education (SBOE) adopts rules and read, write, or spell, despite conventional standards for administering testing and instruction instruction, adequate intelligence, and TEC §7.028(b) relegates responsibility for school sociocultural opportunity. compliance to the local school board 2. “Related disorders” include disorders similar to or 19 (TAC)§74.28 outlines responsibilities of districts related to dyslexia such as developmental auditory and charter schools in the delivery of services to imperceptions, dysphasia, specific developmental students with dyslexia dyslexia, developmental dysgraphia, and The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, §504, establishes developmental spelling disability. assessment and evaluation standards and procedures for students (34 C.F.R. Part 104) 3 4 Dyslexia Guidelines (in Texas) TX Handbook: Dyslexia Difficulties . Students identified as having dyslexia typically experience primary difficulties in phonological awareness, including phonemic awareness and manipulation, single-word reading, reading fluency, and spelling. Consequences may include difficulties in reading comprehension and/or written expression. These difficulties in phonological awareness are unexpected for the student’s age and educational level and are not primarily the result of language difference factors. Additionally, there is often a family history of similar difficulties. 5 6 Flowers & Black Pearson Clinical Assessment 1 Dyslexia or LD in Reading? TCASE 2017 TX Handbook: Primary Dyslexia TX Handbook: Associated Academic Characteristics Difficulties . Difficulty reading words in isolation . May also have problems in written expression, reading comprehension, and . Difficulty accurately decoding unfamiliar mathematics words . Most common co-occurring disorders are ADHD & specific developmental language . Difficulty with oral reading (slow, inaccurate, disorders or labored) . May also experience symptoms such as anxiety, anger, depression, lack of motivation, . Difficulty spelling or low self-esteem 7 8 TX Handbook: Common Risk Factors Assessing Common Associated with Dyslexia Risk Factors Difficulty pronouncing words (e.g., “pusgetti” for “spaghetti,” “mawn lower” for “lawn mower”) Shaywitz DyslexiaScreen offers two teacher Trouble learning and naming letters and numbers and remembering the letters in his/her name questionnaire forms: Aversion to print (e.g., doesn’t enjoy following along if book is read . Form 1 aloud) . Ages 5:0 through 6:11 in Kindergarten Difficulty remembering the names of letters and recalling their corresponding sounds . 10 items Difficulty decoding single words (reading single words in isolation) . Form 2 Difficulty spelling words the way they sound (phonetically) or . Ages 6:0 through 7:11 in Grade 1 remembering letter sequences in very common words seen often in print ( e.g., “sed” for “said”) . 12 items Difficulty with written expression . Results: At Risk for Dyslexia or Not At Risk for AND MORE… Dyslexia 9 10 TX Dyslexia Handbook TX Dyslexia Handbook Areas for Assessment Areas for Assessment Academic Skills Possible Additional Areas Letter knowledge (name and associated sound) Vocabulary Reading words in isolation Listening comprehension Decoding unfamiliar words accurately Verbal expression Reading fluency (both rate and accuracy are assessed) Written expression Reading comprehension Handwriting Spelling Memory for letter or symbol sequences (orthographic processing) Cognitive Processes Mathematical calculation/reasoning Phonological/phonemic awareness Phonological memory Rapid naming of symbols or objects Verbal working memory Processing speed 11 12 Flowers & Black Pearson Clinical Assessment 2 Dyslexia or LD in Reading? TCASE 2017 TX Dyslexia Handbook: Special Ed? Depends upon • Where you live Special education and the assessment through • How the terms are defined IDEA 2004 may occur when dyslexia is associated with factors complicating dyslexia, thus requiring more support than what is available through the general education dyslexia program. 14 13 History of Dyslexia Despite claims to the contrary, it is incontrovertible that there are many people •Dates back to 19th century as “word who struggle to learn to read (decode) for blindness” reasons other than poor teaching. While • “Dyslexia” first used in 1887 by an this condition is widely known as dyslexia, ophthalmologist achieving a clear, scientific, and consensual • Professionals now see dyslexia as understanding of this term has proven Language-based elusive. – But public still defines as a Visual The Dyslexia Debate problem Elliot & Grigorenko, 2014 15 16 Dyslexia and Reversals in Writing PROBLEMS • Myth: Dyslexia is a visual problem – dyslexics see words backwards and letters • Wide ranging incidence rates from 3% to reversed. 20% Fact: This was proven inaccurate by a study by Vellutino. He asked dyslexic and non-dyslexic students to reproduce a • Researchers don’t agree on the nature and series of Hebrew letters that none of them had ever seen features of “dyslexia.” before. The dyslexic students were able to perform the task just as accurately as the non-dyslexic students, showing that – Definitions for research different from defining their dyslexia did not affect their eyesight. for educational resources • Myth: Any child who reverses letters or • Research is not clear on the cause of early numbers has dyslexia. reading difficulties Fact: Up to a certain point, it is considered normal for children to reverse their letters and numbers, and is actually – Deficits are Phonological? Visual & auditory? quite common. However, if this does not stop after two Rapid naming? Working memory? years of handwriting instruction, it becomes a red flag for dyslexia 18 Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Flowers & Black Pearson Clinical Assessment 3 Dyslexia or LD in Reading? TCASE 2017 PROBLEMS Dyslexia Symptoms • Dyslexia is supposed to be brain based • Difficulty with decoding single words (not environment/poor teaching) but – All poor decoders or just a subset?? difficult to tease out the difference • May also have problems with • Lack of agreement about role of IQ comprehension, fluency, motivation • Label of dyslexia doesn’t suggest – Fletcher calls this “Decoding bottleneck” intervention different from those for other • Symptoms have included poor poor decoders phonological awareness, working verbal memory, weak spelling, slow processing, impaired verbal fluency, frequent letter reversals, and more… 19 20 UNEXPECTED? Only Smart Kids ?? • Definitions often include “unexpected poor performance” Special difficulties processing the – Difficult to define unexpected phonological features of language, – Based on intelligence testing? Or failure to respond to intervention? that can co-exist with above • Shaywitz says within a “sea of strengths” average, average, or below – But some poor readers have flat cognitive average general intellectual ability. profiles – Certainly not everyone with dyslexia is gifted… • IQ does not appear to predict which poor readers will be successfully remediated Arkansas Dyslexia Resource Guide 2014 21 22 Who has Dyslexia? • Struggles with accurate single-word decoding The belief that those with dyslexia are high- • Struggles with accurate and/or fluent decoding functioning poor readers, rather than those • Scores at lower end on a test of reading accuracy or fluency who represent the full continuum of • Decoding difficulties cannot be explained in alternative ways • Significant discrepancy between decoding performance & IQ intellectual ability, has continued to persist • Decoding difficulty is unexpected despite all evidence to the contrary. • Decoding skills contrast with strengths in other domains • Decoding problems are biologically determined • Decoding problems marked by associated cognitive The Dyslexia Debate difficulties (phonological, rapid naming, working memory Elliot & Grigorenko, 2014 deficits) • History of very poor spelling • Discrepancy between decoding and listening comprehension • Fail to make progress in decoding with high-quality, evidence-based intervention 23 24 Flowers & Black Pearson Clinical Assessment 4 Dyslexia
Recommended publications
  • Developmental Coordination Disorder and Dysgraphia: Signs and Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Rehabilitation
    Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Developmental coordination disorder and dysgraphia: signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and rehabilitation This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Maëlle Biotteau 1 Abstract: Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a common and well-recognized Jérémy Danna 2 neurodevelopmental disorder affecting approximately 5 in every 100 individuals worldwide. It Éloïse Baudou 3 has long been included in standard national and international classifications of disorders (especially Frédéric Puyjarinet 4 the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). Children and adults with DCD may Jean-Luc Velay 2 come to medical or paramedical attention because of poor motor skills, poor motor coordination, Jean-Michel Albaret 1,5 and/or impaired procedural learning affecting activities of daily living. Studies show DCD persis- tence of 30–70% in adulthood for individuals who were diagnosed with DCD as children, with Yves Chaix 1,3 direct consequences in the academic realm and even beyond. In particular, individuals with DCD 1ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, are at increased risk of impaired handwriting skills. Medium-term and long-term prognosis depends University of Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France; 2Cognitive on the timing of the diagnosis, (possible) comorbid disorders (and their diagnosis), the variability of Neurosciences Laboratory, CNRS-Aix signs and symptoms (number and intensity), and the nature and frequency of the interventions Marseille University, Marseille, France; individuals receive. We therefore chose to investigate the signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and 3Pediatric Neurology Unit, Children’s Hospital, Purpan University Hospital, rehabilitation of both DCD and developmental dysgraphia, which continues to receive far too little Toulouse, France; 4EuroMov Laboratory, attention in its own right from researchers and clinicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Processing Deficits As a Universal Model for Dyslexia
    DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20142014135 Systematic Review Phonological processing deficits as a universal model Revisão Sistemática for dyslexia: evidence from different orthographies Ana Luiza Gomes Pinto Navas1 Déficit em processamento fonológico como um modelo universal Érica de Cássia Ferraz2 Juliana Postigo Amorina Borges2 para a dislexia: evidência a partir de diferentes ortografias Keywords ABSTRACT Dyslexia Purpose: To verify the universal nature of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis for dyslexia, since Education the most influential studies on the topic were conducted in children or adults speakers of English. Research Language strategy: A systematic review was designed, conducted and analyzed using PubMed, Science Direct, and Reading SciELO databases. Selection criteria: The literature search was conducted using the terms “phonological Review processing” AND “dyslexia” in publications of the last ten years (2004–2014). Data analysis: Following screening of (a) titles and abstracts and (b) full papers, 187 articles were identified as meeting the pre- established inclusion criteria. Results: The phonological processing deficit hypothesis was explored in studies involving several languages. More importantly, we identify studies in all types of writing systems such as ideographic, syllabic and logographic, as well as alphabetic orthography, with different levels of orthography- phonology consistency. Conclusion: The phonological processing hypothesis was considered as a valid explanation to dyslexia, in a wide variety of spoken languages and writing systems. Descritores RESUMO Dislexia Objetivo: Verificar a natureza universal da hipótese do déficit de processamento fonológico para a dislexia, uma Educação vez que os estudos mais influentes sobre o tema foram conduzidos com crianças ou adultos falantes do Inglês. Linguagem Estratégia de pesquisa: Uma revisão sistemática foi planejada, conduzida e analisada utilizando as bases de Leitura dados PubMed, Science Direct e SciELO.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Coordination Disorder and Dysgraphia
    Developmental coordination disorder and dysgraphia: signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and rehabilitation Maëlle Biotteau, Jérémy Danna, Éloïse Baudou, Frédéric Puyjarinet, Jean-Luc Velay, Jean-Michel Albaret, Yves Chaix To cite this version: Maëlle Biotteau, Jérémy Danna, Éloïse Baudou, Frédéric Puyjarinet, Jean-Luc Velay, et al.. De- velopmental coordination disorder and dysgraphia: signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and rehabil- itation. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Dove Medical Press, 2019, 15, pp.1873-1885. 10.2147/NDT.S120514. hal-02177153 HAL Id: hal-02177153 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02177153 Submitted on 8 Jul 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Developmental coordination disorder and dysgraphia: signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and rehabilitation This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Maëlle Biotteau 1 Abstract: Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a common and well-recognized Jérémy Danna 2 neurodevelopmental disorder affecting approximately 5 in every 100 individuals worldwide. It Éloïse Baudou 3 has long been included in standard national and international classifications of disorders (especially Frédéric Puyjarinet 4 the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders).
    [Show full text]
  • Dysgraphia: How It Affects a Student’S Performance and What Can Be Done About It
    Dysgraphia: How It Affects A Student’s Performance and What Can Be Done About It Alyssa L. Crouch Jennifer J. Jakubecy A Case Study Published in TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus Volume 3, Issue 3, January 2007 Copyright © 2007 by the author. This work is licensed to the public under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Dysgraphia: How It Affects A Student’s Performance and What Can Be Done About It Alyssa L. Crouch Jennifer J. Jakubecy Abstract The purpose of this study was to apply two techniques, drill activities and fine motor ac- tivities, to find whether they help improve the handwriting of a student with dysgraphia. This action research used an ABAB single subject design to find which technique worked better over an eight-week period. The results were inconclusive on which technique worked better. However, the combination of both improved the subject’s handwriting and increased his score by 50%. Therefore, this study suggests that using both techniques can help improve the problems associated with dysgraphia, especially in the area of handwrit- ing. Keywords handwriting, dysgraphia SUGGESTED CITATION: Crouch, A. L., & Jakubecy, J. J. (2007). Dysgraphia: How it affects a student’s performance and what can be done about it. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 3(3) Article 5. Retrieved [date] from http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/tecplus/vol3/iss3/art5 “The ability to write is truly one of the most ing difficulties can be included under the la- important factors in the academic process.” bel of learning disabilities. Another reason is Timothy Dikowski that there is no consensus in the field on one definition or identification process for dys- Introduction graphia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basics About the 3 D's: Learning Disabilities
    THE BASICS ABOUT THE 3 D’S: LEARNING DISABILITIES Cathy Johnson, M.A., C.C.C, S.L.T Licensed Speech/Language Pathologist Structured Literacy Teacher Speech, Language and Learning Center Johnson Academy of Therapeutic Learning Disclosure Neither I nor any member of my immediate family has a financial relationship or interest (currently or within the past 12 months) with any proprietary entity producing health care goods or services consumed by, or used on, patients related to the content of this CME activity. I do not intend to discuss an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device. Agenda ● Three types of learning disabilities: Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, and Dyscalculia ● Definitions ● Signs and symptoms ● Frequently co‐occurring disorders to be aware of: ADHD (30% of those with dyslexia have coexisting AD/HD) &/or APD Learning Disabilities • Problems with age appropriate reading, spelling, and/or writing • A learning disability is not about how smart a person is but more about how they process sounds and language • Most people diagnosed with learning disabilities have average to superior intelligence Definition of Dyslexia ● Dyslexia is no longer diagnosed with regard to an IQ discrepancy. ● We have known this from research that came out in the early 1990s (e.g., Siegel 1992). ● This was officially changed in the DSM‐5 (2013). Definition of Dyslexia- IDA definition average to above average intellectual ability with an unexpected difficulty in reading 1. Dyslexia is a language‐based learning disability. 2. Dyslexia is hereditary and lifelong. 3. Dyslexia is more common than many people think. 4. Before school starts, dyslexia may not be obvious.
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ONLINE READING RATES and PERFORMANCE on PROFICIENCY TESTS Nawal Mohamed Abdulrahman Al-Othman Email: [email protected]
    120 The Reading Matrix Vol.3. No.3, November 2003 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ONLINE READING RATES AND PERFORMANCE ON PROFICIENCY TESTS Nawal Mohamed AbdulRahman Al-Othman Email: [email protected] Abstract ________________ This article examines the relationship between online reading speed rates and performance on proficiency tests, given the proliferating use of the Internet. The study involved twenty-five post-graduate students enrolled in an ESL Course at the Private Center for Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Kuwait and who are also involved in postgraduate studies. Twelve were familiar with the computer while others were not. Tools used included a background questionnaire to tap into readers’ online accessing of reading materials and their computer familiarity, the Online Speed Reading Test, and a simulated TOEFL Reading Subtest . The main finding of this study is that high rates of reading speeds are positively correlated with good performance on the CBT TOEFL subtest of Reading Comprehension. A correlation co-efficient assessed between the statistics of high-speed readers and high performance rates of subjects of the study reached 0.92. The results of this study suggest that designers of online information should consider that reading online is slower than on paper, which may affect performance on proficiency assessments. __________________ I. Introduction Reading is becoming more and more important in the new knowledge economy and remains the most effective human activity for transforming information into knowledge, be it reading on paper or from the screen. The significance of reading as a major skill and of its sub-skills is attested for so that academic goals need to be pursued right from the beginning in second-and foreign-language classroom settings, especially if the students are expected to be involved in later academic pursuits at advanced levels such as reading abstract materials, getting down to key ideas from lectures, writing critiques, and summaries, and so on and so forth (Richard-Amato, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Word Processing and Reading Comprehension of Skilled and Less Skilled Readers
    Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice - 12(4) • Autumn • 2822-2828 ©2012 Educational Consultancy and Research Center www.edam.com.tr/estp Comparing the Word Processing and Reading Comprehension of Skilled and Less Skilled Readers İ. Birkan GULDENOĞLU Tevhide KARGINa Paul MILLER Ankara University Ankara University University of Haifa Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare the word processing and reading comprehension skilled in and less skilled readers. Forty-nine, 2nd graders (26 skilled and 23 less skilled readers) partici- pated in this study. They were tested with two experiments assessing their processing of isolated real word and pseudoword pairs as well as their reading comprehension skills. Findings suggest that there is a significant difference between skilled and less skilled readers both with regard to their word processing skills and their reading comprehension skills. In addition, findings suggest that word processing skills and reading comprehension skills correlate positively both skilled and less skilled readers. Key Words Reading, Reading Comprehension, Word Processing Skills, Reading Theories. Reading is one of the most central aims of school- According to the above mentioned phonologi- ing and all children are expected to acquire this cal reading theory, readers first recognize written skill in school (Güzel, 1998; Moates, 2000). The words phonologically via their spoken lexicon and, ability to read is assumed to rely on two psycho- subsequently, apply their linguistic (syntactic, se- linguistic processes:
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) in Plain Language
    Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) in Plain Language Academic Areas of Concern Students with specific learning disabilities (SLD) have severe trouble learning or demonstrating skills in one or more of these academic areas: oral expression reading fluency listening comprehension reading comprehension written expression mathematics calculation and basic reading skill mathematics problem solving Students with SLD often do well in some school subjects but have extreme difficulty with skills like decoding (sounding out) words, calculating math facts, or writing down their thoughts. Even with adequate instruction and intensive intervention, a student with SLD has low classroom achievement when compared to students without disabilities in the same grade. Specific information about how the student has responded to instruction and intensive intervention is used to decide if a student is SLD or if the student is not achieving for other reasons. Referral for Special Education When someone thinks a student might have any disability and needs special education, a referral for a special education evaluation is made to the school. The referral must be in writing and say why the person making the referral thinks the student has a disability. A group of people, called an IEP team, which includes the student’s parents, does an evaluation and decides if the student meets state and federal criteria. Three Criteria to Meet The three criteria (requirements) below must be considered by the IEP team and all 3 of them must be met in order to decide the student has SLD. 1. Inadequate Classroom Achievement - This means a student's academic skills in one or more academic areas of concern are well outside the expected range for students without disabilities of the same age.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Learning Disabilities Explain Low Literacy Performance?
    Now and Tomorrow Excellence in Everything We Do Can Learning Disabilities Explain Low Literacy Performance? By Gregory S. McKenna September, 2010 Learning Policy Directorate Strategic Policy and Research Human Resources and Skills Development Canada SP-959-07-10E Can Learning Disabilities Explain Low Literacy Performance? By Gregory S. McKenna July, 2010 Learning Policy Directorate Strategic Policy and Research Human Resources and Skills Development Canada The views expressed in papers published by the Learning Policy Directorate are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada or of the federal government. Note: the departmental catalogue number is placed on the front cover, bottom left hand side. You can order this publication by contacting: Publications Services Human Resources and Skills Development Canada 140, promenade du Portage Phase IV, 12th Floor Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0J9 Fax: 819-953-7260 Online: http://www12.hrsdc.gc.ca This document is available on demand in alternate formats (Large Print, Braille, Audio Cassette, Audio CD, e-Text Diskette, e-Text CD, or DAISY), by contacting 1 800 O-Canada (1-800-622-6232). If you have a hearing or speech impairment and use a teletypewriter (TTY), call 1-800-926-9105. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010 Paper Cat. No.: HS38-22/2010E ISBN: 978-1-100-16366-6 PDF Cat. No.: HS38-22/2010E-PDF ISBN: 978-1-100-16367-3 Acknowledgements The author is grateful to Mr. Mathieu Audet, Dr. Bagala Biswal, Dr. Urvashi Dhawan-Biswal and Dr. Satya Brink for their assistance and support in developing this line of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological and Visual Processing Deficits Can Dissociate In
    Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies Sylviane Valdois, Marie-Line Bosse, Bernard Ans, Serge Carbonnel, Michel Zorman, Danielle David, Jacques Pellat To cite this version: Sylviane Valdois, Marie-Line Bosse, Bernard Ans, Serge Carbonnel, Michel Zorman, et al.. Phonolog- ical and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from twocase studies. Reading and Writing, Springer Verlag, 2003, 16, pp.541-572. hal-00826014 HAL Id: hal-00826014 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00826014 Submitted on 27 May 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies Sylviane Valdois*, Marie-Line Bosse*, B. Ans*, S. Carbonnel*°, Michel Zorman** D. David *** & Jacques Pellat *** * Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale (UMR 5105, CNRS) Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble ** Laboratoire Cogni-sciences et apprentissage, IUFM et Université
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Comprehension Difficulties Handout for Students
    Reading Comprehension Difficulties Definition: Reading comprehension is a process in which knowledge of language, knowledge of the world, and knowledge of a topic interact to make complex meaning. It involves decoding, word association, context association, summary, analogy, integration, and critique. The Symptoms: Students who have difficulty with reading comprehension may have trouble identifying and understanding important ideas in reading passages, may have trouble with basic reading skills such as word recognition, may not remember what they’ve read, and may frequently avoid reading due to frustration. How to improve your reading comprehension: It is important to note that this is not just an English issue—all school subjects require reading comprehension. The following techniques can help to improve your comprehension: Take a look at subheadings and any editor’s introduction before you begin reading so that you can predict what the reading will be about. Ask yourself what you know about a subject before you begin reading to activate prior knowledge. Ask questions about the text as you read—this engages your brain. Take notes as you read, either in the book or on separate paper: make note of questions you may have, interesting ideas, and important concepts, anything that strikes your fancy. This engages your brain as you read and gives you something to look back on so that you remember what to discuss with your instructor and/or classmates or possibly use in your work for the class. Make note of how texts in the subject area are structured you know how and where to look for different types of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Corps Research Base – K-3 Model
    Reading Corps Research Base – K-3 Model This document provides the evidence-base for the Reading Corps K-3 model. Specifically, research supporting the assessment tools and strategies, reading interventions, and the importance of coaching, are presented within a Response to Intervention (RtI) framework. Response to Intervention: Response to Intervention (RtI) is an instructional framework that systematically utilizes assessment data to make instructional decisions, as well as decisions regarding resource allocation (Burns & Gibbons, 2008; Fuchs & Fuchs, 2006; Fuchs, Fuchs, & Compton, 2012). As such, RtI is placed within the general education context because it requires quality core instruction for all students (Tier 1), and calls for universal screening for all students. The assessment data collected in Tier 1 allows educators to determine whether students require additional support to reach proficiency in a particular academic skill area (i.e., reading and math). The Reading Corps model aligns well with the RtI framework because students who are served by Reading Corps members are essentially receiving Tier 2 support; students are eligible for the program based on screening data. Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach at reducing special education referral rates (Marston, et al., 2003; Bollman, Silberglitt, & Gibbons, 2007; Burns & Gibbons, 2008; VanDerHeyden, Witt, & Gilbertson, 2007), and improving reading outcomes (Callender, 2007; Gettinger & Stoiber, 2007; O’Connor, Harty, & Fulmer, 2005; Vellutino, et al.,
    [Show full text]