Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement Also by Nanak Kakwani and Jacques Silber: Nanak Kakwani and Jacques Silber (editors) THE MANY DIMENSIONS OF POVERTY Also by Nanak Kakwani: Nanak Kakwani (author) INCOME INEQUALITY AND POVERTY Methods of Estimation and Policy Applications Nanak Kakwani (author) ANALYZING REDISTRIBUTION POLICIES A Study Using Australian Data Also by Jacques Silber: Jacques Silber (editor) HANDBOOK ON INCOME INEQUALITY MEASUREMENT Y. Flückiger and Jacques Silber (authors) THE MEASUREMENT OF SEGREGATION IN THE LABOR FORCE Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement Edited by Nanak Kakwani University of Sydney Former Director, International Poverty Centre, Brazil and Jacques Silber Bar-Ilan University, Israel UNDP financial support to the International Poverty Centre for holding the International Conference on ‘The Many Dimensions of Poverty’ and the preparation of the papers in this volume is gratefully acknowledged. © United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 2008 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2008 978-0-230-00489-4 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2008 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-28165-7 ISBN 978-0-230-58235-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230582354 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement Edited by Nanak Kakwani and Jacques Silber. p. cm. Papers originally presented at an international conference in Brasilia on August 29–31, 2005. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Income distribution – Mathematical models – Congresses. 2. Poverty – Mathematical models – Congresses. I. Kakwani, Nanak. II. Silber, Jacques. HB523Q36 2007 339.4Ј6072 – dc22 2007022325 10987654321 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 Contents List of Tables and Figures vii Foreword xii Nora Lustig Preface xiv Nanak Kakwani List of Contributors xvi Introduction: On Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement xviii Nanak Kakwani and Jacques Silber 1 The Information Basis of Multivariate Poverty Assesments 1 Esfandiar Maasoumi and Maria Ana Lugo 2 The Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty: the Case of Italy in the 1990s 30 Gianni Betti, Bruno Cheli, Achille Lemmi and Vijay Verma 3 The Rasch Model and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement 49 Alessio Fusco and Paul Dickes 4 A Cluster Analysis of Multidimensional Poverty in Switzerland 63 Giovanni Ferro Luzzi, Yves Flückiger and Sylvain Weber 5 Multidimensional Poverty and Multiple Correspondence Analysis 80 Louis-Marie Asselin and Vu Tuan Anh 6 Income, Consumption and Permanent Income: a MIMIC Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement 104 Ramses Abul Naga and Enrico Bolzani 7 Multidimensional Measures of Poverty and Well-being Based on Latent Variable Models 118 Jaya Krishnakumar 8 A Multidimensional Approach to Subjective Poverty 135 Bernard M.S. van Praag and Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell 9 Using Efficiency Analysis to Measure Individual Well-being With an Illustration for Catalonia 155 Xavier Ramos 10 Efficiency Analysis and the Lower Convex Hull Approach 176 Gordon Anderson, Ian Crawford and Andrew Leicester v vi Contents 11 Measuring Multidimensional Poverty: The Axiomatic Approach 192 Satya R. Chakravarty and Jacques Silber 12 Determining the Parameters of Axiomatically Derived Multidimensional Poverty Indices: An Application Based on Reported Well-Being in Colombia 210 Carlos Eduardo Vélez and Marcos Robles 13 The Order of Acquisition of Durable Goods and the Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty 226 Joseph Deutsch and Jacques Silber 14 Using an Ordinal Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Analysis 244 Jean-Yves Duclos, David E. Sahn and Stephen D. Younger Index 262 List of Tables and Figures Tables 1.1 Univariate poverty measurement by regions. Indonesia, 2000 12 1.A1 Summary statistics by regions. Indonesia, 2000 21 1.A2 Correlation coefficients: Indonesia, 2000 22 1.A3 Multivariate poverty measurement by regions. Indonesia, 2000 25 2.1 Membership functions of an individual in the four intersection sets 37 2.2 Situation of a generic individual i seen in fuzzy terms 38 2.3 Joint measures of deprivation (degrees of membership of individual i of fuzzy sets corresponding to two dimensions of deprivation) 38 2.4 Longitudinal measures of interest over two time periods 40 2.5 Conventional and fuzzy cross-sectional rates of income poverty: Italy and its macro-regions 1993–2000 42 2.6 Fuzzy measures of deprivation: monetary, non-monetary, and the two forms in combination 43 2.7 Longitudinal measures: traditional vs fuzzy approach 44 3.1 Analysis of the 29 items 57 3.2 Analysis of the nine items 58 3.3 Scale of poverty 59 3.4 Analysis of the five items of ‘durable goods’ 60 3.5 Scale of durable goods 60 4.1 Descriptive statistics for the variables used in factor analysis, SHP 2001 66 4.2 Rotated factor loadings (oblique rotation), 2001 69 4.3 Statistics for determining the number of clusters 71 4.4 Mean Scores on the four Factors, by cluster, 1999–2003 71 4.5 Complementary log-log model explaining multidimensional poverty 73 4.6 Complementary log-log model explaining financial poverty (Equivalized Income less than the half of the median income) 75 4.A1 Descriptive statistics for the variables used in cloglog estimation, SHP 2001 79 5.1 MIMAP Vietnam CBMS: first set of 13 poverty indicators (1999) 91 5.2 Mean poverty indicator by province (MIMAP CBMS) 92 5.3 The eight Vietnam-CBMS indicators found in VLSS surveys 93 6.1 Summary statistics 112 6.2 Parameters estimation 113 6.3 Prediction of permanent income 113 7.1 Results of the measurement model 130 7.2 Results of the structural equation model 131 vii viii List of Tables and Figures 8.1 A simple count of domain poverties for GSOEP 1996, West workers 145 8.2 Financial satisfaction GSOEP, 1996, West-workers, COLS 146 8.3 Domain variance/correlation matrix; GSOEP 1996 West workers 147 8.4 German general satisfaction explained (GSOEP, 1996 West workers), method: POLS 148 8.A1 Health satisfaction Germany, 1996 West-workers, POLS 152 8.A2 Job satisfaction GSOEP, 1996 West-workers, POLS 152 8.A3 Housing satisfaction GSOEP, 1996 West-workers, POLS 153 8.A4 Leisure satisfaction GSOEP, 1996 West-workers, POLS 153 8.A5 Environmental satisfaction GSOEP, 1996 West-workers, POLS 154 9.1 Summary statistics of well-being dimensions and overall well-being 163 9.2 Correlations between well-being dimensions, overall well-being and income 164 9.3 OLS regressions on well-being 166 9.4 Logit marginal effects on the well-being of the poor 168 9.A1 Variables used to estimate the dimensions 174 9.A2 Summary statistics of covariates used in Table 9.3 175 10.1 Welfare measures for hypothetical households 181 10.2 Distance measures to lowest and highest welfare households 184 10.3 Summary statistics for Human Development Index data 185 10.4 Deprivation indices summary statistics 186 10.5 Dominance tests 188 11.1 Poverty measurement with the Index P␪ 204 11.2 Multidimensional poverty measurement with the index Pr 205 12.1 Self-reported well-being: Colombia, 1997, 2003 212 12.2 Income-poverty measures: Colombia, 1997–2003 213 12.3 Poverty, unemployment and wages. Colombia, urban, 1996, 2000 214 12.4 Education poverty. Colombia, 1997–2003 215 12.5 Income-poverty measures taking into account public subsidies: Colombia, 1997–2003 216 12.6 Seven standard functional forms of MDP indexes and their main characteristics 217 12.7 Multidimensional measurements of poverty: Income, education and security, Colombia, 1997–2003 220 13.1 Ownership of durable goods by gender of head of household 228 13.2 Ownership of durable goods by household size 229 13.3 Ownership of durable goods by age of head of household 229 13.4 Ownership of durable goods by marital status of head of household 230 13.5 Ownership of durable goods by year of immigration of head of household 231 List of Tables and Figures ix 13.6 Ownership of durable goods by schooling level (years of schooling) of head of household 231 13.7 Ownership of durable goods by number of months worked by
Recommended publications
  • Offshoring Domestic Jobs
    Offshoring Domestic Jobs Hartmut Egger Udo Kreickemeier Jens Wrona CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO. 4083 CATEGORY 8: TRADE POLICY JANUARY 2013 An electronic version of the paper may be downloaded • from the SSRN website: www.SSRN.com • from the RePEc website: www.RePEc.org • from the CESifo website: www.CESifoT -group.org/wp T CESifo Working Paper No. 4083 Offshoring Domestic Jobs Abstract We set up a two-country general equilibrium model, in which heterogeneous firms from one country (the source country) can offshore routine tasks to a low-wage host country. The most productive firms self-select into offshoring, and the impact on welfare in the source country can be positive or negative, depending on the share of firms engaged in offshoring. Each firm is run by an entrepreneur, and inequality between entrepreneurs and workers as well as intra- group inequality among entrepreneurs is higher with offshoring than in autarky. All results hold in a model extension with firm-level rent sharing, which results in aggregate unemployment. In this extended model, offshoring furthermore has non-monotonic effects on unemployment and intra-group inequality among workers. The paper also offers a calibration exercise to quantify the effects of offshoring. JEL-Code: F120, F160, F230. Keywords: offshoring, heterogeneous firms, income inequality. Hartmut Egger University of Bayreuth Department of Law and Economics Universitätsstr. 30 Germany – 95447 Bayreuth [email protected] Udo Kreickemeier Jens Wrona University of Tübingen University of Tübingen Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences Mohlstr. 36 Mohlstr. 36 Germany - 72074 Tübingen Germany - 72074 Tübingen [email protected] [email protected] January 8, 2013 We are grateful to Eric Bond, Jonathan Eaton, Gino Gancia, Gene Grossman, James Harrigan, Samuel Kortum, Marc Muendler, IanWooton, and to participants at the European Trade Study Group Meeting in Leuven, the Midwest International Trade Meetings in St.
    [Show full text]
  • 1709974* Hri/Core/Che/2017
    United Nations HRI/CORE/CHE/2017 International Human Rights Distr.: General 16 June 2017 Instruments English Original: French Common core document forming part of the reports of States parties Switzerland* [Date received: 18 May 2017] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.17-09974 (EXT) *1709974* HRI/CORE/CHE/2017 Contents Page I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. General information about Switzerland ........................................................................................... 3 A. Geographical, historical, demographic, social, cultural, economic and legal characteristics .. 3 1. Geography ....................................................................................................................... 3 2. History ............................................................................................................................. 4 3. Demography .................................................................................................................... 5 4. Social and cultural characteristics ................................................................................... 6 5. Economic characteristics ................................................................................................. 9 6. Crime statistics and the criminal justice system .............................................................. 9 B. Constitutional, political and legal
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen-Focused Results Orientation in Citizen- Centered Reform
    Public Disclosure Authorized HANDBOOK ON PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS (IN SIX VOLUMES) Public Disclosure Authorized VOLUME 3: BRINGING CIVILITY IN Public Disclosure Authorized GOVERNANCE Edited by Anwar Shah Public Disclosure Authorized CONTENTS Handbook Series At A Glance Foreword Preface Acknowledgements Contributors to this Volume OVERVIEW by Anwar Shah Chapter 1: Public Expenditure Incidence Analysis by Giuseppe C. Ruggeri Introduction ..................................................................................1 General Issues ................................................................................2 The Concept of Incidence ...........................................................2 The Government Universe .........................................................5 What is Included in Government Expenditures ......................5 Disaggregation by Level of Government .................................6 The Database .............................................................................7 The Unit of Analysis ...................................................................8 Individuals, Households and Families ...................................8 Adjustment for Size ..............................................................10 Grouping by Age and by Income Levels ...............................11 The Concept of Income .............................................................12 2 Bringing Civility in Governance Annual versus Lifetime Analysis .............................................16 The Allocation
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality Measurement Development Issues No
    Development Strategy and Policy Analysis Unit w Development Policy and Analysis Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs Inequality Measurement Development Issues No. 2 21 October 2015 Comprehending the impact of policy changes on the distribu- tion of income first requires a good portrayal of that distribution. Summary There are various ways to accomplish this, including graphical and mathematical approaches that range from simplistic to more There are many measures of inequality that, when intricate methods. All of these can be used to provide a complete combined, provide nuance and depth to our understanding picture of the concentration of income, to compare and rank of how income is distributed. Choosing which measure to different income distributions, and to examine the implications use requires understanding the strengths and weaknesses of alternative policy options. of each, and how they can complement each other to An inequality measure is often a function that ascribes a value provide a complete picture. to a specific distribution of income in a way that allows direct and objective comparisons across different distributions. To do this, inequality measures should have certain properties and behave in a certain way given certain events. For example, moving $1 from the ratio of the area between the two curves (Lorenz curve and a richer person to a poorer person should lead to a lower level of 45-degree line) to the area beneath the 45-degree line. In the inequality. No single measure can satisfy all properties though, so figure above, it is equal to A/(A+B). A higher Gini coefficient the choice of one measure over others involves trade-offs.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nevada, Reno the Effects of Fiscal Reforms On
    University of Nevada, Reno The Effects of Fiscal Reforms on Economic Growth in Chinese Provinces: 1985-2007 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Economics by Xingchen Wang Dr. Mehmet Tosun/Thesis Advisor May, 2010 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by XINGCHEN WANG entitled The Effects of Fiscal Reforms on Economic Growth in Chinese Provinces: 1985-2007 be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Mehmet Tosun, Advisor Elliott Parker, Committee Member Jiangnan Zhu, Graduate School Representative Marsha H. Read, Ph. D., Associate Dean, Graduate School May, 2010 i Abstract Fiscal reforms have played an important role in China’s development for the last thirty years. This paper mainly examines the effects of fiscal decentralization on China’s provincial growth. Through constructing indicators for revenue and expenditure decentralization respectively, regression results indicate that they are both positively affecting economic growth in Chinese provinces. Along with the rapid development, the inequality issue has drawn much concern that fiscal reforms have indirectly hindered China’s even regional growth. Another model is set up to support this conclusion. However, as a distinct form of inequality, poverty has been largely alleviated in this process. Especially in the reform era of China, the absolute number of poverty population has declined dramatically. ii Acknowledgement I would like to express the deepest appreciation to my committee chair, Professor Mehmet Tosun, with whose patient guidance I could have worked out this thesis. He has offered me valuable suggestions and ideas with his profound knowledge in Economics and rich research experience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of Measuring Poverty and Inequality: a Comparative Analysis of the Main Indicators
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Martín-Legendre, Juan Ignacio Article The challenge of measuring poverty and inequality: a comparative analysis of the main indicators European Journal of Government and Economics (EJGE) Provided in Cooperation with: Universidade da Coruña Suggested Citation: Martín-Legendre, Juan Ignacio (2018) : The challenge of measuring poverty and inequality: a comparative analysis of the main indicators, European Journal of Government and Economics (EJGE), ISSN 2254-7088, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, pp. 24-43, http://dx.doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2018.7.1.4331 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/217762 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • TRENDS in INCOME INEQUALITY: GLOBAL, INTER-COUNTRY, and WITHIN COUNTRIES Zia Qureshi1 Over the Last Three Decades, Inequality Be
    TRENDS IN INCOME INEQUALITY: GLOBAL, INTER-COUNTRY, AND WITHIN COUNTRIES Zia Qureshi1 Over the last three decades, inequality between countries has decreased while inequality within countries has increased. Global inequality, which is the sum of inequality between and within countries, has declined modestly but remains high. Latest estimates put the Gini coefficient of global income distribution at around 0.7. Global inequality rose for much of the period between the Industrial Revolution and the early part of the twentieth century (Figure 1). Both between-country and within-country inequalities widened. The dominant contribution to the rise in global inequality during this period came from rising inequality between countries. Gaps in national mean incomes widened as the economies of Western Europe and North America, spurred by the Industrial Revolution, increasingly pulled away from the rest of the world. Global inequality continued to rise for much of the post-war period in the twentieth century but at a slower pace. Inequality between countries widened further and then stabilized. However, within-country inequality declined in the industrialized economies, starting with the impact of the wars and depressions on higher incomes and then helped by rising demand for labor as economic growth strengthened, improved education, more progressive fiscal regimes and the creation of welfare states. Global inequality peaked around 1980 and has since shown a modest decline. This decline reflects the balance of two opposing trends. First, inter-country inequality reversed course and has been declining as economic growth picked up in the developing world (Figure 2). Average per capita economic growth in developing and emerging economies has exceeded that of advanced economies for most of the period since the early 1980s, allowing their mean incomes to begin to converge toward those of advanced economies (Figure 3).
    [Show full text]
  • How Unequal Were the Latins? the “Strange” Case of Portugal, 1550-1770
    How unequal were the Latins? The “strange” case of Portugal, 1550-1770 Jaime Reis* Álvaro Santos Pereira** Conceição Andrade Martins* *Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa ** Simon Fraser University For help and advice, the authors wish to express their gratitude to Maria Antónia Pires de Almeida, Inês Amorim, Raquel Berredo, Leonor Freire Costa, Rui Esperança, Carlos Faísca, João Ferrão, João Fialho, António Castro Henriques, Bruno Lopes, Filomena Melo, Esteban Niccolini, Susana Pereira, Amélia Polónia, Isabel dos Guimarães Sá and Ana Margarida Silva. Address for correspondence: [email protected] 1 1. Introduction Latin countries are perceived by much of the literature nowadays as having always been more unequal economically than others with similar levels of income. In part, this view is accounted for by contemporary economic inequalities, which show that Latin countries both in Europe and in the Americas exhibit comparatively higher degrees of income or wealth disparity (Lopez and Perry, 2008). At the same time, it has been supported by the work of Engerman and others on the different paths of long term development in the New World (Engerman and Sokoloff, 1997, Engerman, Haber and Sokoloff, 2000). Their claim is that differing patterns of inequality go back a very long way and are in fact evident already in the earliest colonial period. Over time they became more firmly entrenched and ultimately were a powerful determinant of macro divergence between, respectively, Latin America, and Canada and the USA. This colonial legacy has thus become a central part of the conventional wisdom which explains the economic differences displayed by post colonial societies (Frankema, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Review of the OECD Database on Household Incomes and Poverty and the OECD Earnings Database Part III
    Jobs, Wages and Inequality: Work Package 1 - Quality review of the OECD database on household incomes and poverty and the OECD earnings database Part III VS/2012/0052 (SI2.625180) 20 December 2012 Social Policy Division http://www.oecd.org/social/inequality.htm Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III. INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA – COUNTRY REVIEWS .................................................... 4 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW – AUSTRALIA ..................................................................... 5 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW –AUSTRIA.......................................................................... 12 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW – BELGIUM ........................................................................ 20 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW – CANADA ......................................................................... 27 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW - CHILE ............................................................................... 34 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW – CZECH REPUBLIC ........................................................ 42 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW – DENMARK ...................................................................... 48 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW – ESTONIA ......................................................................... 59 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW – FINLAND ........................................................................ 65 INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW - FRANCE ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Inequality Prof. Dr. Awudu Abdulai Department of Food Economics and Consumption Studies
    Poverty and Inequality Prof. Dr. Awudu Abdulai Department of Food Economics and Consumption studies Poverty and Inequality Poverty is the inability to achieve a minimum standard of living Inequality refers to the unequal distribution of material or immaterial resources in a society and as a result, different opportunities to participate in the society Poverty is not only a question of the absolute income, but also the relative income. For example: Although people in Germany earn higher incomes than those in Burkina Faso, there are still poor people in Germany and non-poor people in Burkina Faso -> Different places apply different standards -> The poor are socially disadvantaged compared to other members of a society in which they belong Measuring Poverty How to measure the standard of living? What is a "minimum standard of living"? How can poverty be expressed in an index? Ahead of the measurement of poverty there is the identification of poor households: ◦ Households are classified as poor or non-poor, depending on whether the household income is below a given poverty line or not. ◦ Poverty lines are cut-off points separating the poor from the non- poor. ◦ They can be monetary (e.g. a certain level of consumption) or non- monetary (e.g. a certain level of literacy). ◦ The use of multiple lines can help in distinguishing different levels of poverty. Determining the poverty line Determining the poverty line is usually done by finding the total cost of all the essential resources that an average human adult consumes in a year. The largest component of these expenses is typically the rent required to live in an apartment.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Income Distribution: Evidence from Pakistan
    Globalization and Income Distribution: Evidence from Pakistan Shahzad Hussain, Dr. Imran Sharif Chaudhry and Mahmood-ul-Hasan* Abstract It is widely believed that income inequality can be reduced through opening up of the economies of developing countries into the world market. But changes in country’s trade exposure and world market can affect negatively the distribution of resources within the country. This paper empirically explores the impact of globalization on income distribution using econometric time series approach for the period 1972- 2005 in Pakistan. The results are in favor of the conventional wisdom that opening up of the economy into the international market has good effects on the distribution of income. Income inequality can be reduced through foreign capital penetration. Huge trade volume with negative trade balance must be controlled. Key Words: Globalization, Income Distribution, Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment, Remittances JEL Classification: D31, F10, F21, F24 I. Introduction Nations across the globe have established progressively closer contacts with the passage of time, but recently the pace has dramatically increased. These closer contacts of different forms are welcomed by the politicians, academics, journalists and economists throughout the world. But many also believe that business-driven globalization is uprooting the old ways of life and threatening the cultures and livelihoods of the poor people. Nevertheless globalization is a multi-dimensional phenomenon. Economic globalization can comprehensively defined as a process of rapid economic integration among countries driven by liberalization of trade, investment and capital flows as well as technological change (Torres, 2001).Globalization is also movement across international borders of goods and factors of production.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Poverty Survey
    SWITZERLAND 1992: Survey Information Table of contents: A. General Characteristics B. Population, sample size and sampling methods C. Data collection and acquisition D. Definition of the survey units E. Weighting procedures F. Quality of the data A. General characteristics Name Nationale Armutsstudie ( National Poverty Survey) This survey was conducted for the first time in 1992. The main purpose of the survey was to ‘picture’ the extent of poverty in Switzerland and to collect information about the living conditions and income in Switzerland. In this regard it is not a traditional income survey that is done on a regular basis. Data collection started in September 1992 and was completed in May 1996. The results of the survey became available as micro data in 1996. The study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. Administrative unit responsable for the survey Volkswirtschaftliches Institut, Universität Bern Gesellschaftsstrasse 49 3012 Bern Switzerland Telephone : +41 31 631 40 49 Telefax : +41 31 631 39 92 B. Population, sample size and sampling methods Sample frame Persons included in the survey were selected from different registers: · Electoral registers for Swiss citizens · Federal data file for foreign nationals · Resident population database The selected people were taken from the resident population; the latter includes all adults above the age of 20 and consists of 5.307 million people. (Foreigners with a permanent resident permit are included in this) The sample also included persons who are living in institutions, nursing homes, hospitals or prisons. Some groups within the resident population had a greater chance of being selected, namely · Persons older than 60 · Persons with low income (lowest 3 income deciles) After the selection of the sample from the sample frame, no specific groups were excluded from the sample.
    [Show full text]