DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Party of California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green Party of California Green Party of California Delegate Apportionment for the May 2012 General Assembly San Francisco Registered County % of Total Delegates Greens (1) Alameda 9,333 10.0% 10 Contra Costa 3,293 3.5% 3 El Dorado 909 1.0% 1 Fresno 1,622 1.7% 2 Humboldt 2,897 3.1% 3 Lake 409 0.4% 1 Los Angeles 22,415 23.9% 24 Marin 2,114 2.3% 2 Mendocino 1,860 2.0% 2 Monterey 1,083 1.2% 1 Napa 790 0.8% 1 Nevada 1,106 1.2% 1 Orange 7,593 8.1% 8 Riverside 2,504 2.7% 3 Sacramento 4,070 4.3% 4 San Diego 7,422 7.9% 8 San Francisco 8,550 9.1% 9 San Luis Obispo 1,345 1.4% 1 San Mateo 2,432 2.6% 3 Santa Clara 4,163 4.4% 4 Shasta 463 0.5% 1 Sonoma 4,592 4.9% 5 Tulare 444 0.5% 1 Ventura 2,206 2.4% 2 TOTAL ACTIVE 93,615 100.0% 100 STATE TOTAL 110,431 Agenda of the May 2012 General Assembly of the Green Party of California Saturday, May 12 8:00am Breakfast, registration 9:00am Opening, new delegate orientation, quorum count 9:30am Agenda approval 9:45am Consent calendar (a) Proposal: Add already approved GPCA Endorsement Procedures to GPCA Rules and Procedures (Campaigns & Candidates Working Group) (Text on Page 5.) 10:00am Confirmation: Doug Barnett, Nominee for GPCA Treasurer 10:10am Confirmation: Jeanne Rosenmeier, Nominee for GPCA Assistant Treasurer 10:20am Election: On-site voting for GPUS Delegation delegates and alternates (hand out ballots, read candidate applications here) (Text beginning on Page 8.) 10:25am Presentation: Coordinating Committee at-large candidates make statements; election via on- line vote begins after General Assembly (read candidate applications here) (Text beginning on Page 16.) 10:45am Proposal: Budget FY2012-2013 (Budget Committee), Strategic Plan (Coordinating Committee) (Text beginning on Page 25.) 12:15pm Lunch, Womens Caucus meeting during lunch (also possible press conference during lunch) 2 1:25pm Quorum count 1:30pm Proposal: Budget FY2012-2013 (Budget Committee), Strategic Plan (Coordinating Committee) Proposal: Change the GPCA Fiscal Year from May 1 to April 30 to July 1 to June 30 (Text beginning on Page 26.) 3:00pm Breakout sessions for committees and working groups (CCWG, Platform, Finance, GROW) 4:30pm Presentation: Update on Legal Cases against Proposition 14/SB6 (Coordinating Committee) (Text on Page 27.) 4:40pm Presentation: Update on State Laws affecting GPCA ballot status (Coordinating Committee) (Text beginning on Page 28.) 4:50pm Proposal: Amend GPCA Elections Code (Coordinating Committee) (Text on Page 29.) 5:50pm Announcements 6:00pm Dinner – at local restaurants, GPUS Delegation meeting during dinner, possible speaker during part of dinner 7:30pm Green Party 2012 presidential candidate forum at the Victoria Theatre; Roseanne Barr, Dr. Kent Mesplay and Dr. Jill Stein. The Victoria Theatre is across the street from the Redstone Building. 3 Sunday May 13 8:00am Breakfast, registration 9:00am Breakout sessions for committees and working groups (CCWG, Green Issues, Media) 10:20pm Quorum count, optional bring back time for any consent calendar items pulled during Saturday's session 10:25am Proposal: Bylaws Amendment - Standing Green Assembly, other modifications (Bylaws Committee); Because of the amount of text provided with this proposal, please read it at the link above and only print the pages you need. The proposal is not printed below. Report on At-Large Coordinating Committee elections (Coordinating Committee) (Text beginning on Page 30.) 12:20pm Womens Caucus Mothers Day presentation 12:30pm Lunch, Optional caucus meetings 1:35pm Announcements 1:40pm Completion of County Polling in Propositions 28 and 29 (if necessary); Discussion: Two Platform Planks – Energy (page 34) and Proportional Representation (page 37) 2:45pm Breakout sessions for committees and working groups (Finance, Bylaws, ERWG, Clearinghouse) 4:00pm Confirmation: Standing Committee and Working Group Co-Coordinators (GPCA Bylaws 6- 1.9 Coordinators) 4:15pm Closing session 4 Complete text of items on the agenda 9:45am Consent calendar Proposal: Add already approved GPCA Endorsement Procedures to GPCA Rules and Procedures (Campaigns & Candidates Working Group) Add already approved GPCA Endorsement Procedures to GPCA Rules and Procedures SPONSOR: Campaigns and Candidates Working Group PRESENTER: --------- SUBJECT: Add already approved GPCA Endorsement Procedures to GPCA Rules and Procedures BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The June 2006 Ventura General Assembly passed a GPCA Endorsements procedure for General and Primary elections. But it never made it onto the GPCA web page into any of the party's rules documents. Now that the GPCA has a distinct set of Rules and Procedures, this proposal would add to them a General Election section, by taking the 2006 text and editing it for brevity and to fit the formatting of the Rules and Procedures. Text governing Primary Election endorsements would be deferred for later consideration, given the uncertainty around the duration and effects of Proposition 14, and the fact that its too late to deal with it this year and there are no statewide Green candidates anyways. PROPOSAL: That the GPCA Rules and Procedures be amended to add the following text Article III Candidate Endorsement Procedures Section 3-1 General Elections 3-1.1 The GPCA may endorse Green Party members who are General Election candidates for the following offices: 3-1.1(a) Partisan statewide constitutional offices (Governor, Lt. Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, Controller, Insurance Commissioner) 3-1.1(b) Non-Partisan statewide constitutional offices (Superintendent of Education) 3-1.1(c) State Board of Equalization 3-1.1(d) U.S. Senate 3-1.2 The GPCA shall not make any endorsements of General Election candidates who are not Green Party members. 3-1.3 Whenever possible, the GPCA shall make its endorsements by bringing the matter before the General Assembly. Where it is not possible, the decision may be brought before the GPCA through County Polling. The Coordinating Committee is not empowered to make candidate endorsements on behalf of the GPCA. 5 3-1.4 The GPCA shall not consider endorsements for General Election candidates for other offices, leaving such endorsements to the county level. County organizations are encouraged to develop their own standards and procedures for endorsing such candidates. The endorsement of a County Organization shall not imply GPCA endorsement. COMMITTEE DECISION: Agreed by consensus on CCWG February 22nd Conference call. TIMELINE: Effective upon adoption. RESOURCES: Web page updated to reflect amended text REFERENCE: Attached copy of endorsement policy approved in 2006 GPCA CANDIDATE ENDORSEMENT POLICY FOR GENERAL ELECTIONS (approved by the GPCA General Assembly, June 25, 2006, 43-6-2) 1. The GPCA may endorse Green Party members who are General Election candidates for the following offices: A. Partisan statewide constitutional offices (Governor, Lt. Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, Controller, Insurance Commissioner) B. Non-Partisan statewide constitutional offices (Superintendent of Education) C. State Board of Equalization D. U.S. Senate 2. The GPCA shall not make any endorsements of General Election candidates who are not Green Party members. 3. Whenever possible, the GPCA shall make its endorsements by bringing the matter before the General Assembly, taking into account agenda distribution deadlines and other relevant procedural issues. 4. Where it is not possible to bring the decision before the General Assembly, the decision may be brought before the GPCA through a polling of the Counties. 5. The GPCA CC is not empowered to make these decisions on behalf of the GPCA. 6. Other than for the offices mentioned above, the GPCA will not consider endorsements for Green Party members who are General Election candidates for other offices, leaving the question of endorsement to the local/regional level. 6 7. These are policies of the GPCA. County organizations and locals are encouraged to develop their own procedures and standards for endorsing or otherwise evaluating local candidates. The endorsement(s) of a county organization or local shall clearly indicate that it is an endorsement of that local or county organization. GPCA CANDIDATE ENDORSEMENT POLICY FOR PRIMARY ELECTIONS (approved by the GPCA General Assembly, June 25, 2006, by consensus) 1. Except in extraordinary circumstances, the GPCA will not endorse candidates in contested Green Party primaries. To establish if such extraordinary circumstances exist, the following process shall apply: A. The GPCA CC must approve a statement of findings, that would clarify what are the extraordinary circumstances and their significance for the GPCA. B. If such a statement of findings is approved by the GPCA CC, an endorsement proposal would be brought before the GPCA. 2. Whenever possible, these endorsements shall be made by bringing the matter before the General Assembly, taking into account agenda distribution deadlines and other relevant procedural issues. 3. Where it is not possible to bring these endorsements before the General Assembly, the decision may be brought before the GPCA through a polling of the Counties. 4. The GPCA CC is not empowered to make these decisions on behalf of the GPCA. 5. This procedure applies to Primary Elections for the following offices: A. Partisan statewide constitutional offices (Governor, Lt. Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, Controller, Insurance Commissioner) B. Non-Partisan statewide constitutional offices (Superintendent of Education) C. State Board of Equalization
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minutes Ed Read Minutes, Mike Skelly Seconded and They Were Approved
    March 17, 2012 GPNJ Convention 9:45 Convention called to order by Mike Spector. Mike addressed the convention. He encouraged us to obtain signatures for Ken Wolski’s senate run. Only 50 signatures are needed for House Races this year. Ballot Issue Nick pointed out we need Freeholder candidates to get a ballot line on left side of ballot instead of on far right. Jill Stein Speech Introduction Jill Stein was introduced by her campaign manager and spoke on struggles in Wisconsin to overcome Governor Walker’s policies and the Chamber of Commerce Jill is homegrown and recruited into GP. Jill is speaking all over the country to get signatures. For ballot access and increase awareness of GP. Jill is seeking denotations for her campaign to obtain federal matching funds. She needs $5,000 in 20 states raised by contributions of $250 or less. If 20 people give $250, then NJ has qualified. Almost half in NJ have done so already. She is reaching ballot access in 48 states. Jill’s Speech There is hope for 3rd party. Democratic movements. Obama is supporting the wrong policies, just as the Republicans are. Jill emphasized the importance of giving people a choice and not having to vote for corporate rule. Jill’s would have communities make decisions on how to implement a Green New Deal. She spoke of the NDAA act which did away of right to trial and HR 347 that can criminalize protest by having ground demonstrations declared national security land protestors made felons. She called for a Voter bill of rights, IRV (rank choice), and proportional representation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rules of #Metoo
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2019 Article 3 2019 The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Jessica A. (2019) "The Rules of #MeToo," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2019 , Article 3. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2019/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke† ABSTRACT Two revelations are central to the meaning of the #MeToo movement. First, sexual harassment and assault are ubiquitous. And second, traditional legal procedures have failed to redress these problems. In the absence of effective formal legal pro- cedures, a set of ad hoc processes have emerged for managing claims of sexual har- assment and assault against persons in high-level positions in business, media, and government. This Article sketches out the features of this informal process, in which journalists expose misconduct and employers, voters, audiences, consumers, or professional organizations are called upon to remove the accused from a position of power. Although this process exists largely in the shadow of the law, it has at- tracted criticisms in a legal register. President Trump tapped into a vein of popular backlash against the #MeToo movement in arguing that it is “a very scary time for young men in America” because “somebody could accuse you of something and you’re automatically guilty.” Yet this is not an apt characterization of #MeToo’s paradigm cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Early History of the United States Green Party, 1984-2001
    Early History of the United States Green Party, 1984-2001 Mike Feinstein and John Rensenbrink May 15, 2017 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................. 4 First Stirrings of a Green Political Party in the United States ................................ 5 Green Politics: The Global Promise .......................................................................... 6 Early Outreach to the Bioregional Movement .......................................................... 8 The Founding of U.S. Greens – St. Paul, MN, August 1984 ................................... 10 Creation of the Ten Key Values ............................................................................... 12 National Clearinghouse ............................................................................................ 14 Early Debates About Green Issues ......................................................................... 15 First National Green Gathering – Amherst, MA, 1987 ............................................ 16 Strategy & Policy Approaches in Key Areas (SPAKA) .......................................... 17 Greening the West Gathering – near San Francisco, 1988 ................................... 18 Second National Green Gathering – Eugene, OR, 1989 ........................................ 19 Early State Party Ballot Qualification Efforts and Candidacies ............................ 21 Third National Green Gathering – Estes Park, CO, 1990………………………….. 23 Green
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Election Tabulation Committee Green Party of the United States for the Steering Committee Election of July 26
    Report of the Election Tabulation Committee Green Party of the United States For the Steering Committee Election of July 26, 2014 Green Party Annual National Meeting St. Paul, Minnesota To: Green Party of the U.S. Green National Committee From: GPUS Elections Tabulations Committee: Holly Hart (Iowa) Frank Young (West Virginia) Rich Zitola (California) Morgen D'Arc (Maine) Craig Thorsen (Lavender Caucus) Date: August 15, 2014 Subject: Final report 2014 We hereby submit this final report in accordance with our responsibilities pursuant to the Bylaws of the Green Party of the United States, Article VI §6-2, and as further specified in the GPUS Rules and Procedures Article VII, as amended. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Declaration of Results for Co-Chairs and Treasurer II. Narrative Report III. Anomalies and Recommendations IV. Tabulation of Votes Appendix I: Steering Committee Election Ballots Appendix II: GPUS Rules and Procedures: Article VII I. DECLARATION of RESULTS FOR CO-CHAIR AND TREASURER We declare that the following candidates for Co-Chair of the Steering Committee of the Green Party of the United States were duly elected on July 26, 2014, according to the rules specified in Article VII of the Green Party Rules and Procedures: Audrey Clement (Virginia) Karen Young (New York) Charles Ostdiek (Nebraska) We declare that the following candidate for Treasurer of the Green Party of the United States was duly elected according to the rules specified in Article VII of the Green Party Rules and Procedures: Jeff Turner (Hawaii) We recommend that the Green National Committee certify the candidates named above as having been elected to the positions indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item Memorandum
    AGENDA DOCUMENT NO. 12-82 .-·:::El\:'[0 FEJEi\;\L ELECT!O;"! COMMISSION SECRETARIAT 2012 NOV 29 PH 4: 41 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 November 29, 2012 AGENDA ITEM MEMORANDUM TO: The Commission iF or Meeting of I~ -0-Jil, FROM: Anthony Herman ~ LA,. A/ General Counsel "" ·l/ I Kevin Deele/?{_ ()" Acting Associate General Counsel Robert M. Knop t7.AU t-­ Assistant General ~~s~ Anthony T. Buckley Jd __}; Attorney ~ './ Subject: Draft AO 2012-36 (Green Party of Connecticut) Attached is a proposed draft of the subject advisory opinion. We have been asked to have this draft placed on the Open Session agenda for December 6, 2012. Attachment ADVISORY OPINION 2012-36 2 3 Christopher Reilly DRAFT 4 Treasurer 5 Green Party of Connecticut 6 P. 0. Box 231214 7 Hartford, CT 06123-1214 8 Dear Mr. Reilly: 9 We are responding to your inquiry regarding the status of the Green Party of 10 Connecticut (the "GPC") as a State party committee of a political party under the Federal 11 Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the "Act"), and Commission regulations. 12 The Commission concludes that the GPC qualifies as a State party committee because: 13 (1) the Green Party of the United States (the "OPUS") qualifies as a political party; 14 (2) the GPC is part of the official OPUS structure; and (3) the GPC is responsible for the 15 day-to-day operations of the OPUS at the State level. 16 Background 17 The facts presented in this advisory opinion are based on your letter received on 18 October 22,2012 and an email from Budd Dickinson ofthe OPUS received on 19 October 31, 20 12; on information contained on the web sites of the GPC 20 (http://www.ctgreenparty.org/) and the OPUS (http://www.gp.org/index.php); and on 21 disclosure reports filed with the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Green Party Platform
    Platform 2014 Green Party of the United States Approved by the Green National Committee July 2014 About the Green Party The Green Party of the United States is a federation of state Green Parties. Committed to environmentalism, non-violence, social justice and grassroots organizing, Greens are renewing democracy without the support of corporate donors. Greens provide real solutions for real problems. Whether the issue is universal health care, corporate globalization, alternative energy, election reform or decent, living wages for workers, Greens have the courage and independence necessary to take on the powerful corporate interests. The Federal Elec - tions Commission recognizes the Green Party of the United States as the official Green Party National Com - mittee. We are partners with the European Federation of Green Parties and the Federation of Green Parties of the Americas. The Green Party of the United States was formed in 2001 from of the older Association of State Green Parties (1996-2001). Our initial goal was to help existing state parties grow and to promote the formation of parties in all 51 states and colonies. Helping state parties is still our primary goal. As the Green Party National Com - mittee we will devote our attention to establishing a national Green presence in politics and policy debate while continuing to facilitate party growth and action at the state and local level. Green Party growth has been rapid since our founding and Green candidates are winning elections through - out the United States. State party membership has more than doubled. At the 2000 Presidential Nominating Convention we nominated Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke for our Presidential ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/30 Likely General Election Voters 1
    Suffolk University/WSVN-TV Miami 9/27 – 9/30 Likely General Election Voters FL Statewide Marginals AREA N= 600 100% South .......................................... 1 168 28% North .......................................... 2 132 22% West ........................................... 3 150 25% East ........................................... 4 150 25% INT00 Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for 7NEWS/ Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. Would you be willing to spend five minutes answering some questions? N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 00 600 100% GENDR RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 278 46% Female ......................................... 2 322 54% S1. Thank You. Are you currently registered to vote in Florida? N= 600 100% Yes ............................................ 1 600 100% No ............................................. 2 0 0% S2. How likely are you to vote this November - very likely, somewhat likely, 50-50, not very likely, or not at all likely? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 582 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 18 3% 50-50 .......................................... 3 0 0% Not very likely ................................ 4 0 0% Not at all likely .............................. 5 0 0% Und/Refused .................................... 6 0 0% Q1. How are you currently registered to vote - Democrat, Republican, or Independent / No
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Green Party Platform
    Platform 2010 Green Party of the United States As Adopted by the Green National Committee September 2010 About the Green Party The Green Party of the United States is a federation of state Green Parties. Committed to environmentalism, non-violence, social justice and grassroots organizing, Greens are renewing democracy without the support of corporate donors. Greens provide real solutions for real problems. Whether the issue is universal health care, corporate globalization, alternative energy, election reform or decent, living wages for workers, Greens have the courage and independence necessary to take on the powerful corporate interests. The Federal Elec - tions Commission recognizes the Green Party of the United States as the official Green Party National Com - mittee. We are partners with the European Federation of Green Parties and the Federation of Green Parties of the Americas. The Green Party of the United States was formed in 2001 from of the older Association of State Green Parties (1996-2001). Our initial goal was to help existing state parties grow and to promote the formation of parties in all 51 states and colonies. Helping state parties is still our primary goal. As the Green Party National Com - mittee we will devote our attention to establishing a national Green presence in politics and policy debate while continuing to facilitate party growth and action at the state and local level. Green Party growth has been rapid since our founding and Green candidates are winning elections through - out the United States. State party membership has more than doubled. At the 2000 Presidential Nominating Convention we nominated Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke for our Presidential ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • PERFECTION, WRETCHED, NORMAL, and NOWHERE: a REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY of AMERICAN TELEVISION SETTINGS by G. Scott Campbell Submitted T
    PERFECTION, WRETCHED, NORMAL, AND NOWHERE: A REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY OF AMERICAN TELEVISION SETTINGS BY G. Scott Campbell Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geography and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________________________ Chairperson Committee members* _____________________________* _____________________________* _____________________________* _____________________________* Date defended ___________________ The Dissertation Committee for G. Scott Campbell certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: PERFECTION, WRETCHED, NORMAL, AND NOWHERE: A REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY OF AMERICAN TELEVISION SETTINGS Committee: Chairperson* Date approved: ii ABSTRACT Drawing inspiration from numerous place image studies in geography and other social sciences, this dissertation examines the senses of place and regional identity shaped by more than seven hundred American television series that aired from 1947 to 2007. Each state‘s relative share of these programs is described. The geographic themes, patterns, and images from these programs are analyzed, with an emphasis on identity in five American regions: the Mid-Atlantic, New England, the Midwest, the South, and the West. The dissertation concludes with a comparison of television‘s senses of place to those described in previous studies of regional identity. iii For Sue iv CONTENTS List of Tables vi Acknowledgments vii 1. Introduction 1 2. The Mid-Atlantic 28 3. New England 137 4. The Midwest, Part 1: The Great Lakes States 226 5. The Midwest, Part 2: The Trans-Mississippi Midwest 378 6. The South 450 7. The West 527 8. Conclusion 629 Bibliography 664 v LIST OF TABLES 1. Television and Population Shares 25 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloomberg Touts Prison Record
    • JAMAICA TIMES • ASTORIA TIMES • FOREST HILLS LEDGER • LAURELTON TIMES LARGEST AUDITED • QUEENS VILLAGE TIMES COMMUNITY • RIDGEWOOD LEDGER NEWSPAPER IN QUEENS • HOWARD BEACH TIMES • RICHMOND HILL TIMES Jan. 3-9, 2014 Your Neighborhood - Your News® FREE ALSO COVERING ELMHURST, JACKSON HEIGHTS, LONG ISLAND CITY, MASPETH, MIDDLE VILLAGE, REGO PARK, SUNNYSIDE Family moves to Far Rock Images of after son’s brain surgery despair Page 3 QGuide Page 25 DOT closes exit Bloomberg touts prison record on Queensboro after cop death Mayor stops by Jamaica probation offi ce to highlight record low incarceration rate BY RICH BOCKMANN rates at the same time the city is and having a lower crime rate,” bottom line — while locking up BY BILL PARRY experiencing record-low levels of Bloomberg said during a news fewer people and the connection Just a few days before he left crime. conference at the city Department is exactly what you think because A new era began on the Ed office, Mayor Michael Bloomberg “Now we think that this is of Probation office at the corner all the evidence shows that all too Koch-Queensboro Bridge with was in downtown Jamaica last a huge success and that there of Guy R. Brewer Boulevard and often repeated spells behind bars the closing of the entire Queens- week touting his administration’s is a connection between incar- Jamaica Avenue. can lock inmates into a cycle of bound outer roadway Monday work to reduce incarceration cerating fewer young people “We kept our city safer — the Continued on Page 38 night. Motorists are no longer al- lowed to use the lane between the hours of 9 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Illinois Green Party Presidential Preference Process Note
    Summary of Illinois Green Party Presidential Preference Process Note: Rules are attached as an appendix to this summary. Beginning February 1 and ending February 19, the Illinois Green Party, in lieu of access to a state- administered primary, administered an online primary vote to stand as its primary presidential preference process. The ballot options consisted of Jill Stein, Kent Mesplay, Undecided, and Write-In, with a space for entering a Write-In vote. In the determination of the Election Administrator, Patrick Kelly, 152 valid ballots were cast, with the vote breaking down as follows: Jill Stein – 108 Roseanne Barr – 26 Kent Mesplay – 8 Undecided – 7 Ralph Nader – 1 James Michael Jenne – 1 Cynthia McKinney – 1 Following from these results, delegates were proportionally allocated as follows: Jill Stein – 22 delegates Roseanne Barr – 5 delegates Kent Mesplay – 2 delegates Undecided / Unbound – 2 delegates This allocation was approved by consensus at the Illinois Green Party Coordinating Committee meeting of February 20. Subsequently, at the Illinois Green Party State Convention, March 2-4 in Macomb, delegates were selected in accordance with the allocation. Delegates will vote in accordance with the candidates to whom they are allocated, except that the two unbound delegates are free to cast votes as they wish. The names of delegates have been sent separately to the GPUS Credentials Committee. Phil Huckelberry Chair, Illinois Green Party Illinois Green Party 2012 Presidential Preference and Delegate Selection Processes Approved – November 21, 2011 Revised – January 16, 2012 Note: These processes were approved by the ILGP Coordinating Committee, as authorized by the ILGP Membership at its July 2011 Membership Meeting, pursuant to Section 10-E of ILGP Bylaws, which reads in its entirety: 10-E.
    [Show full text]
  • SEVEN STORIES PRESS 140 Watts Street
    SEVEN STORIES PRESS 140 Watts Street New York, NY 10013 BOOKS FOR ACADEMIC COURSES 2019 COURSES ACADEMIC FOR BOOKS SEVEN STORIES PRESS STORIES SEVEN SEVEN STORIES PRESS BOOKS FOR ACADEMIC COURSES 2020 SEVEN STORIES PRESS TRIANGLE SQUARE SIETE CUENTOS EDITORIAL BOOKS FOR ACADEMIC COURSES 2020–2021 “Aric McBay’s Full Spectrum Resistance, Volumes One and Two “By turns humorous, grave, chilling, and caustic, the stories and are must reads for those wanting to know more about social essays gathered in [Crossing Borders] reveal all the splendors movement theory, strategies and tactics for social change, and and all the miseries of the translator’s task. Some of the most the history and politics of activism and community organizing. distinguished translators and writers of our times offer reflections There is nothing within the realm of social justice literature that that deepen our understanding of the delicate and some- matches the breadth of modern social movements depicted in times dangerous balancing act that translators must perform. these books. These are engaging, critical, exciting, and outstand- Translators are often inconspicuous or unnoticed; here we have ing intersectional books that respectfully speak about the pitfalls a chance to peer into the realities and the fantasies of those who and successes for social change.” live in two languages, and the result is altogether thrilling and —ANTHONY J. NOCELLA II, assistant professor of criminology, instructive.” Salt Lake Community College, and co-editor of Igniting a Revolution: —PETER CONNOR, director of the Center for Translation Studies, Voices in Defense of the Earth Barnard College “By placing readers into an intimate conversation with one of “For large swaths of the body politic, the December 2016 US this country’s most important thinkers, as well as members of the elections offered up the prospect of a long and dark winter in Occupy Wall Street movement, Wilson and Gouveia provide a America.
    [Show full text]