DOCSLIB.ORG

Miocene Marine Diatoms from the Choptank Formation, Calvert County, Maryland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Miocene Marine Diatoms from the Choptank Formation, Calvert County, Maryland Miocene Marine Diatoms From the Choptank Formation, Calvert County, Maryland GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 910 Miocene Marine Diatoms From the Choptank Formation, Calvert County, Maryland By GEORGE W. ANDREWS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 910 A description of a 1niddle hi iocene marine diatonl assentblage for the Atlantic Coastal Plain region and its stratigraphic and paleoecologic significance UNITED STATES GOVERN"IENT PRI~ TI~G OFFICE, '\\rASHINGTON 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOIVIAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. l\icKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Andrews, George William, 1929- Miocene marine diatoms from the Choptank Formation, Calvert County, Maryland. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 910) Bibliography: p. Includes index. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:910 1. Diatoms, Fossil. 2. Paleontology-Miocene. 3. Paleontology-Maryland-Calvert Co. I Title II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 910. QE955.A62 561'.93 74-34195 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02735-6 CONTENTS Page Abstract ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Acknowledgments --------------------------------------------------------- 1 Miocene stratigraphy ____________________________________ - ----------------- 2 Calvert Cliffs locality _ ___ _ _ __ _ ___ _ __ ____ _ __ __ _ __ _ __ __ _ __ _____ _ ___ _ ____ ____ 2 Previous work on diatoms of the Chesapeake Group -------------------------- 4 Diatom assemblage ------------------------------------------------------- 6 Systematic descriptions ________________________________ -------------------- 7 Selected references -------------------------------------------------------- 23 Index ------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates follow index I PLATE 1. Melosira, Paralia, Pyxidicula, and Stephanopy;r;is. 2. Stephanopyxis and Coscinodiscus. 3. Coscinodiscns, Craspedodiscus, and Actinocyclus. 4. H yalodiscus and Actinoptyclws. 5. Rattrayella, Liradiscus, Biddulphia, Goniothecium, Encampia, Terpsinoe, Trice'ratium, and Periptera. 6. Xanthiopyxis, Dossctia, Stephanogonia, Psemlopyxilla, and Rhaphoneis. 7. Rhaphoncis, Thalassioncma, Tlwlassiothrix, Grammatophora, Cocconcis, Na'vicula,, Diploneis, Pleurosigma, and Amphora. Page FIGURE 1. Index map showing location of the Calvert Cliffs area in Maryland --------------------------------- 3 2. Map showing location of the Choptank fossil diatom locality, Calvert County, Md -------------------- 4 TABLE Page TABLE 1. Comparison of diatom taxa from the Chesapeake Group. ___________________________________________ _ 7 III MIOCENE MARINE DIATOMS FROM THE CHOPTANK FORMATION, CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND By GEORGE W. ANDRE\VS ABSTRACT been found in the St. Marys Formation of Mary­ The Choptank Formation of Miocene age contains diatom­ land. The upper shell bed of the Choptank Forma­ bearing strata in outcrops in the Calvert Cliffs on the west tion, exposed in the Calvert Cliffs southeast of Long side of Chesapeake Bay. A good diatom assemblage is pres­ ent in the upper part (stratigraphic zone 19 of Shattuck Beach, Calvert County, Mel., contains a diatom as­ [1904] ) in the section exposed immediately north of the Cal­ semblage of 60 taxa; this assemblage is the specific vert Cliffs nuclear power plant, Calvert County, Md. subject of this report. The assemblage is distinct­ The Choptank Formation has long been correlated with the ly more modern in aspect than those reported previ­ middle Miocene of the European section principally on the ously from the Calvert Formation, and it is con­ basis of its molluscan fauna. Recent studies of planktonic Foraminifera suggest that it correlates with either the upper sidered to be a representative middle Miocene dia­ Langhian, the Serravalian, or the Tortonian Stages (middle tom assemblage developed in a shallow marine shelf to upper Miocene) , but a more precise determination has not environment. It occurs in a formation of fairly well yet been made. The macrofauna and microfauna of the forma­ determined stratigraphic position (specifically, the tion are suggestive of deposition in a shallow, inner-shelf base of lithologie unit 18 of Gernant [ 1970, p. 7 4 ] marine environment. The diatom assemblage in the upper part of the Choptank Formation reinforces these conclusions. from stratigraphic zone 19 of Shattuck [ 1904 ] of There are fewer extinct taxa and more still-living taxa in the the Choptank Formation) and hence should be ade­ Choptank assemblage than in the older assemblages present quate to serve the purpose of this study-to provide in the underlying Calvert Formation. The Choptank assem­ data on the occurrence of fossil marine diatoms blage consists of exclusively marine diatom species and is from a stratum of known geologic age and to n1ake dominated by the more robust centric planktonic diatoms. The presence of these diatoms is indicative of a shallow, agitated these data available for regional geologie correla­ depositional environment and the fact that only a low per­ tion and elating. centage of benthonic species is present suggests muddy bot­ tom conditions and a shifting substratum. i\CKNOWLEDG i\IENTS Sixty taxa of marine diatoms have been identified in this Choptank 'assemblage; seven are previously unreported, 18 are Access to the collection locality was made possible extinct forms known only from Miocene rocks, six are ex­ through the kind cooperation of Robert E. Ger­ tinct forms ranging outside Miocene rocks, and 29 are long­ nant, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Lin­ ranging forms still living in modern oceans. This study of the coln Dryden, Bryn Mawr College, who were in Choptank diatoms adds to our knowledge of the stratigraphic charge of the Calvert Cliffs Project sponsored by ranges of diatom species and thus increases their usefulness in stratigraphic correlation and geologic age determination the Maryland Academy of Sciences. John L. Stone, of Tertiary strata. Washington, D.C., prepared several slides for the writer with Naphrax, 1 a high-index mounting me­ INTRODUCTION diunl; in addition, he searched a number of slides This report is the first part of a study of fossil for additional specimens and provided helpful dis­ marine diatoms in the Tertiary strata of the Atlan­ cussion of the diatom identification and taxonomy. tic Coastal Plain. The Calvert, Choptank, and St. Kenneth E. Lohman, Division of Paleobotany, The Marys Formations, all part of the Chesapeake Smithsonian Institution, Blake Blackwelder, Joseph Group, crop out as a sequence of clastic deposits E. Hazel, and Sergius H. Mamay, U.S. Geological along the Atlantic Coastal Plain of Maryland and Survey, have reviewed the manuscript and their Virginia. The Calvert Formation is highly to mod­ many helpful comments are appreciated. erately diatomaceous, the Choptank Formation is 1 Anv use of tJ·a(le names in this publication i,; for descriptive purposes sparingly diatomaceous, and diatoms have not yet only a'Od does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. 1 2 MIOCENE MARINE DIATOMS FROM THE CHOPTANK FORMATION lVIIOCENE STRATIGRAPHY ing of the shells and secondary carbonate deposi­ The Miocene strata of the Middle Atlantic States tion. The Fairhaven Diatomaceous Earth Member of have been well known since early colonial times be­ the Calvert Formation rests unconformably on un­ cause of their excellent exposure along Chesapeake derlying Eocene strata. It may be readily distin­ Bay in Maryland and along the Potomac River es­ guished from the Eocene deposits, which contain tuary in Virginia. Shattuck (1904, p. 41-64) gives abundant glauconite and quartz granules but lack an exhaustive bibliography of publications on the diatoms. The Fairhaven consists mainly of an im­ Miocene strata of Maryland for the years 1669- pure silty diatomite. The overlying Plum Point Marl 1903. Modern stratigraphic terminology began with Member of the Calvert Formation consists of a Darton (1891, p. 433), who named the entire Mio­ series of impure fine sands, silts, and clays and beds cene stratigraphic section of the region the Chesa­ composed primarily of mollusk shells in a sand-silt­ peake Formation. This name was modified by Dall clay matrix. This part of the Calvert Formation is and Harris ( 1892, p. 123) to Chesapeake Group and moderately diatomaceous. was extended to include all Miocene strata of the The Choptank Formation is said by Shattuck Atlantic Coastal Plain. The Chesapeake Group in (1904, p. 80) to rest unconformably upon the Cal­ Maryland was first divided into the Calvert, Chop­ vert Formation. Although this may be apparent on tank, and St. Marys Formations by Shattuck (1902). a regional basis, the Choptank lithology is so similar The Chesapeake Group in Maryland was described to that of the upper part of the Calvert Formation in detail by ShaUuck ( 1904, p. 69-92) , and the sys­ that an exact determination of the contact is diffi­ tematic paleontology of various fossil groups of the cult in most outcrops. Two parts of the Choptank Miocene deposits of Maryland was also presented Formation, stratigraphic zones 17 and 19, are dis­ in that volume, including a chapter by C. S. Boyer tinguished primarily by their high content of mol­ (1904) on the diatoms. Shattuck (1904) divided the lusk shells. The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Akashiwo Sanguinea
    Ocean ORIGINAL ARTICLE and Coastal http://doi.org/10.1590/2675-2824069.20-004hmdja Research ISSN 2675-2824 Phytoplankton community in a tropical estuarine gradient after an exceptional harmful bloom of Akashiwo sanguinea (Dinophyceae) in the Todos os Santos Bay Helen Michelle de Jesus Affe1,2,* , Lorena Pedreira Conceição3,4 , Diogo Souza Bezerra Rocha5 , Luis Antônio de Oliveira Proença6 , José Marcos de Castro Nunes3,4 1 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - Faculdade de Oceanografia (Bloco E - 900, Pavilhão João Lyra Filho, 4º andar, sala 4018, R. São Francisco Xavier, 524 - Maracanã - 20550-000 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil) 2 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais/INPE - Rede Clima - Sub-rede Oceanos (Av. dos Astronautas, 1758. Jd. da Granja -12227-010 - São José dos Campos - SP - Brazil) 3 Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana - Departamento de Ciências Biológicas - Programa de Pós-graduação em Botânica (Av. Transnordestina s/n - Novo Horizonte - 44036-900 - Feira de Santana - BA - Brazil) 4 Universidade Federal da Bahia - Instituto de Biologia - Laboratório de Algas Marinhas (Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Campus de Ondina 40170-115 - Salvador - BA - Brazil) 5 Instituto Internacional para Sustentabilidade - (Estr. Dona Castorina, 124 - Jardim Botânico - 22460-320 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil) 6 Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina (Av. Ver. Abrahão João Francisco, 3899 - Ressacada, Itajaí - 88307-303 - SC - Brazil) * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRAct The objective of this study was to evaluate variations in the composition and abundance of the phytoplankton community after an exceptional harmful bloom of Akashiwo sanguinea that occurred in Todos os Santos Bay (BTS) in early March, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map and Cross Sections of the Leonardtown 30 X 60- Minute
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map and Cross Sections of the Leonardtown 30 X 60- Minute Quadrangle, Maryland and Virginia by Lucy McCartan1 Wayne L. Newell1 James P. Owens1 * Gary M. Bradford1** Open-File Report 95-665 Prepared in cooperation with the Maryland Geological Survey This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 Reston, Va. *Deceased **Volunteer for Science CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Map contruction 4 Mapping paradigms 4 Time 5 Depositional environments 5 Previous work 6 Geologic overview 6 Structural setting 7 Ground-water chemistry 9 Discussion of selected stratigraphic units 10 Pleistocene deposits 11 Lowland unit Q2 11 Lowland unit Q3 11 Lowland unit Q4 11 Lowland unit Q5 12 Pliocene deposits 13 Upland unit T1 13 Yorktown Formation 14 Miocene deposits 14 Eastover Formation 14 St. Marys Formation 15 Choptank Formation 15 Calvert Formation 16 Pre-Miocene units 16 Nanjemoy Formation 17 Marlboro Clay 18 Aquia Formation 18 Acknowledgements 19 References cited 20 Description of map units 26 TABLES Units found only below land surface (see cross sections) 28 Table 1 Regional correlation of stratigraphic units 29 Table 2 Ground-water chemistry of selected formations 30 Table 3 Some typical characteristics of stratigraphic units 34 FIGURES Explanation of map units 35 Map symbols 36 Figure 1 Map showing distribution of depositional lithofacies of the Yorktown Formation 37 GEOLOGIC MAP AND CROSS SECTIONS OF THE LEONARDTOWN 30 X 60 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA by Lucy McCartan, W.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Contributions and Studies
    Thecachampsa antiqua (Leidy, 1852) (Crocodylidae: Thoracosaurinae) from Fossil Marine Deposits at Lee Creek Mine, Aurora, North Carolina, USA Albert C. Myrick, Jr. Formation (early Pliocene; Gibson, 1983; Hazel, 1983). It ABSTRACT provides a first opportunity to study the Lee Creek crocodilian materials in relation to other similar forms of comparable geo- Fossil remains of crocodilians at Lee Creek Mine have been few and fragmentary. Nevertheless, isolated teeth and dermal plates logic age. The purpose of this paper is to describe the Lee from the spoil piles are identifiable as Thecachampsa antiqua Creek Mine crocodilian specimens and to comment on the (Leidy). This species was established by Leidy on characters of taxonomic status and paleozoogeographic implications related teeth presumably from the Calvert Formation of Virginia (late to the Lee Creek Mine occurrence and to occurrences of early to early middle Miocene), but the species is now validated by skulls and numerous elements from the middle Miocene forma- closely related forms elsewhere. tions of the Chesapeake Group. The same form is common in the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.•The Lee Creek Mine specimens cit- Florida early Pliocene, where it is represented by several fairly ed in this report were collected and donated by P.J. Harmatuk, complete skeletons known as Gavialosuchus americanus (Sell- F. Hyne, and B. Hyne. I thank L.G. Barnes (Los Angeles arás). It also is known from numerous skulls from early and mid- County Museum of Natural History) for providing refresher dle Miocene formations near Lisbon, Portugal, as Tomistoma lusitanica (Vianna and Moraes). Teeth and a dermal scute indicat- information on the California specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • DGS OFR46.Qxd
    State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John H. Talley, State Geologist REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 75 STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION OF THE OLIGOCENE TO PLEISTOCENE SECTION AT BETHANY BEACH, DELAWARE by Peter P. McLaughlin1, Kenneth G. Miller2, James V. Browning2, Kelvin W. Ramsey1 Richard N. Benson1, Jaime L. Tomlinson1, and Peter J. Sugarman3 University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 1 Delaware Geological Survey 2008 2 Rutgers University 3 New Jersey Geological Survey State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John H. Talley, State Geologist REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 75 STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION OF THE OLIGIOCENE TO PLEISTOCENE SECTION AT BETHANY BEACH, DELAWARE by Peter P. McLaughlin1, Kenneth G. Miller2, James V. Browning2, Kelvin W. Ramsey1, Richard N. Benson,1 Jaime L. Tomlinson,1 and Peter J. Sugarman3 University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 2008 1Delaware Geological Survey 2Rutgers University 3New Jersey Geological Survey Use of trade, product, or firm names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the Delaware Geological Survey. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACTG........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTIONG................................................................................................................... 1 Previous WorkG.......................................................................................................... 2 AcknowledgmentsG.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of ‘Araphid’ Diatoms Inferred from SSU and LSU Rdna, RBCL and PSBA Sequences Linda K
    Phylogeny of ‘araphid’ diatoms inferred from SSU and LSU rDNA, RBCL and PSBA sequences Linda K. Medlin, Yves Desdevises To cite this version: Linda K. Medlin, Yves Desdevises. Phylogeny of ‘araphid’ diatoms inferred from SSU and LSU rDNA, RBCL and PSBA sequences. Vie et Milieu / Life & Environment, Observatoire Océanologique - Laboratoire Arago, 2016. hal-02144540 HAL Id: hal-02144540 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02144540 Submitted on 26 Jul 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. VIE ET MILIEU - LIFE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 66 (2): 129-154 PHYLOGENY OF ‘arapHID’ DIatoms INFErrED From SSU and LSU RDNA, RBCL AND PSBA SEQUENCES L. K. MEDLIN 1*, Y. DESDEVISES 2 1 Marine Biological Association of the UK, the Citadel, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK Royal Botanic Gardens, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK 2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Biologie Intégrative des Organismes Marins (BIOM), Observatoire Océanologique, F-66650, Banyuls/Mer, France * Corresponding author: [email protected] ARAPHID ABSTRACT. – Phylogenies of the diatoms have largely been inferred from SSU rDNA sequenc- DIATOMS DIVERGENCE TIME ESTIMATION es. Because previously published SSU rDNA topologies of araphid pennate diatoms have var- LSU ied, a supertree was constructed in order to summarize those trees and used to guide further PINNATE analyses where problems arose.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Choptane Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE CHOPTANE QUADRANGLE. By Benjamin Leroy Miller. INTRODUCTION. ment of water power, are located such important towns and dip. The oldest strata dip 50 to 60 feet to the mile in some cities as Trenton, Philadelphia, Wilmington, Baltimore, Wash­ places, but the succeeding beds are progressively less steeply LOCATION AND AREA. ington, Fredericksburg, Richmond, Petersburg, Raleigh, Cam- inclined and in the youngest deposits a dip of more than a few The Choptank quadrangle lies between parallels 38° 30' and den, Columbia, Augusta, Macon, and Columbus. A line drawn feet to the mile is uncommon. 39° north latitude and meridians 76° and 76° 30' west through these places would approximately separate the Coastal longitude. It includes one-fourth of a square degree of the Plain from the Piedmont Plateau. TOPOGRAPHY. earth's surface and contains 931.51 square miles. From north The Coastal Plain is divided by the present shore line into RELIEF. to south it measures 34.5 miles and from east to west its mean two parts a submerged portion, known as the continental INTRODUCTION. width is 27 miles, as it is 27.1 miles wide along the southern shelf or continental platform, and a,n emerged portion, com­ and 26.9 miles along the northern border. monly called the Coastal Plain. In some places the line sepa­ The altitude of the land in the Choptank quadrangle ranges rating the two parts is marked by a sea cliff of moderate from sea level to 120 feet above. The highest point lies about 77 height, but commonly they grade into each other with scarcely 2 miles south of Annapolis on the western margin of the quad­ perceptible change and the only mark of separation is the shore rangle.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Ancillary Map Information Document for Colonial National Historical Park
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate Geologic Resources Division Colonial National Historical Park GRI Ancillary Map Information Document Produced to accompany the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Digital Geologic Data for Colonial National Historical Park colo_geology.pdf Version: 8/18/2015 I Colonial National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Ancillary Map Information Document for Colonial National Historical Park Table of Contents Geolog.i.c. .R...e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .M...a..p.. .D..o..c..u..m...e..n..t....................................................................... 1 About th..e.. .N...P..S.. .G...e..o..l.o..g..i.c. .R...e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .P...r.o..g..r.a..m........................................................... 2 GRI Dig.i.t.a..l. .M...a..p.. .a..n..d.. .S..o..u..r.c..e.. .M...a..p.. .C..i.t.a..t.i.o..n............................................................................... 4 Map Un.i.t. .L..i.s..t.......................................................................................................................... 5 Map Un.i.t. .D..e..s..c..r.i.p..t.i.o..n..s............................................................................................................. 6 Qf - Fill. .(.R...e..c..e..n..t.)........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Qms - M...a..r.s..h.. .s..e..d..i.m...e..n..t. .(.R..e..c..e..n..t.)................................................................................................................................... 6 Qss - S..w...a..m...p.. .s..e..d..i.m..e..n..t. .(..R..e..c..e..n..t.)................................................................................................................................. 6 Qb - Be..a..c..h.. .a..n..d.. .d..u..n..e.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Revision of Upper Miocene and Lower Pliocene Beds of the Chesapeake Group, Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
    Stratigraphic Revision of Upper Miocene and Lower Pliocene Beds of the Chesapeake Group, Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1482-D Stratigraphic Revision of Upper Miocene and Lower Pliocene Beds of the Chesapeake Group, Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain By LAUCK W. WARD and BLAKE W. BLACKWELDER CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1482-D UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 198.0 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ward, Lauck W Stratigraphic revision of upper Miocene and lower Pliocene beds of the Chesapeake group-middle Atlantic Coastal Plain. (Contributions to stratigraphy) (Geological Survey bulletin ; 1482-D) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:1482-D 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Miocene. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic-Pliocene. 3. Geology- Middle Atlantic States. I. Blackwelder, Blake W., joint author. II. Title. III. Series. IV. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Bulletin ; 1482-D. QE694.W37 551.7'87'0975 80-607052 For sale by Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract __ Dl Introduction 1 Acknowledgments ____________________________ 4 Discussion ____________________________________ 4 Chronology of depositional events ______________________ 7 Miocene Series _________________________________ g Eastover Formation ___________________________ 8 Definition and description ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Paleoecology of the Maryland Miocene
    The Geology and Paleontology of Calvert Cliffs Calvert Formation, Calvert Cliffs, South of Plum Point, Maryland. Photo by S. Godfrey © CMM A Symposium to Celebrate the 25th Anniversary of the Calvert Marine Museum’s Fossil Club Program and Abstracts November 11, 2006 The Ecphora Miscellaneous Publications 1, 2006 2 Program Saturday, November 11, 2006 Presentation and Event Schedule 8:00-10:00 Registration/Museum Lobby 8:30-10:00 Coffee/Museum Lobby Galleries Open Presentation Uploading 8:30-10:00 Poster Session Set-up in Paleontology Gallery Posters will be up all day. 10:00-10:05 Doug Alves, Director, Calvert Marine Museum Welcome 10:05-10:10 Bruce Hargreaves, President of the CMMFC Welcome Induct Kathy Young as CMMFC Life Member 10:10-10:30 Peter Vogt & R. Eshelman Significance of Calvert Cliffs 10:30-11:00 Susan Kidwell Geology of Calvert Cliffs 11:00-11-15 Patricia Kelley Gastropod Predator-Prey Evolution 11:15-11-30 Coffee/Juice Break 11:30-11:45 Lauck Ward Mollusks 11:45-12:00 Bretton Kent Sharks 12:00-12:15 Michael Gottfried & L. Compagno C. carcharias and C. megalodon 12:15-12:30 Anna Jerve Lamnid Sharks 12:30-2:00 Lunch Break Afternoon Power Point Presentation Uploading 2:00-2:15 Roger Wood Turtles 2:15-2:30 Robert Weems Crocodiles 2:30-2:45 Storrs Olson Birds 2:45-3:00 Michael Habib Morphology of Pelagornis 3:00-3:15 Ralph Eshelman, B. Beatty & D. Domning Terrestrial Vertebrates 3:15-3:30 Coffee/Juice Break 3:30-3:45 Irina Koretsky Seals 3:45-4:00 Daryl Domning Sea Cows 4:00-4:15 Jennifer Gerholdt & S.
    [Show full text]
  • DGS 21 Cover MK
    DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS AND STRATIGRAPHY OF THE POLLACK FARM SITE, DELAWARE1 Kelvin W. Ramsey2 ABSTRACT At the Pollack Farm Site near Cheswold, Delaware, surficial Quaternary deposits of the Columbia, Lynch Heights, and Scotts Corners formations unconformably overlie the Calvert Formation of Miocene age. The Quaternary units were deposit- ed in fluvial to estuarine environments. The Calvert Formation at the site is subdivided into seven informal lithostratigraphic units, in ascending order—shelly mud, lower shell bed, lower sand, interbedded sand and mud, cross-bedded sand, and upper mud. The units represent deposition in shallow marine (shelly mud), subtidal (lower shell bed, lower sand, interbedded sand and mud), and subtidal to intertidal-supratidal (cross-bedded sand, upper mud) environments. The depositional setting was probably much like that of modern coastal Georgia with scattered barrier islands fronting small estuaries and tidal channels with a fresh-water influence and nearby uplands. Mixing of marine, estuarine, fresh-water, and terrestrial vertebrate and inver- tebrate taxa is common in such a setting. This setting was part of a much larger deltaic progradational complex that deposit- ed, in Delaware, the Cheswold sands of the lower part of the Calvert Formation. INTRODUCTION the site. He also assisted in mapping the locations of excava- The Chesapeake Group (upper Oligocene–-upper tions and, with C. Scott Howard, in measuring the sections. Pliocene) of the middle Atlantic Coastal Plain has long Alfred D. Donofrio of Century Engineering, Inc., was instru- received attention because of the excellent molluscan faunas mental in providing the engineering plans for the site. preserved within its sediments (Shattuck, 1904).
    [Show full text]
  • York River Geology by Carl Hobbs
    York River Geology Carl Hobbs Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point, VA 23061 U.S.A. ABSTRACT The four separate sites of the Chesapeake Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve in Virginia are within the Coastal Plain province of the mid- Atlantic. The surficial geology at each site is of Quaternary age, primarily Holocene wetlands. The site at Taskinas Creek is set into Tertiary age strata. The underlying strata increase in age up-stream. Regionally, the Late Tertiary and Quaternary geology is a function of the series of major transgressions and regressions, during which the successively more recent high stands of sea level generally have not reached the level of the pre- ceding high stand. As a consequence, stratigraphically higher, younger deposits occur topographically below exposures of the older strata. The two down-stream reserve sites are within the area of the Eocene age Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater. Also at these two sites, the tidal marshes are superimposed on a ridge and swale topography. The local rate of sea-level rise, approximately 4 mm/yr, is the underlying process driving changes to the tidal marshes at all four sites. The Goodwin Islands, at the mouth of the York River with exposure to Chesapeake Bay, can be severely impacted by storm waves and surge. Future research should include a program ofcoring to develop the time-history of recent rise of sea level and assist on-going efforts toward mapping the regional geology and toward understanding the local and regional ground-water systems.In addition, establishment of permanent benchmarks to document elevation would enable long-term monitoring of subsidence and facilitate differentiation of the eustatic and isostatic components of changes in relative sea-level rise relative to climate change or other factors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to the Fossils of Scientists' Cliffs
    A Field Guide to the Fossils of Scientists’ Cliffs A brief introduction to the geological history of the area, with descriptions of the common (and not so common) fossils found here. July 2004 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 0 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 SCOPE .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.6 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. GEOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 NAMING ROCK/SOIL UNITS ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]