Newsletter Summer 2000 Living Oceans Society Box 166 Sointula BC Canada V0N 3E0

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletter Summer 2000 Living Oceans Society Box 166 Sointula BC Canada V0N 3E0 LIVINGLIVINGLIVING OCEANSOCEANSOCEANSnewsletter Summer 2000 Living Oceans Society Box 166 Sointula BC Canada V0N 3E0 Oil and Water Don’t Mix Living Oceans Society sup- ports the existing federal and The coast of BC is home to one of the world’s released last summer. In fact, the report omit- largest Orca populations and is home to bil- ted the BC Alliance for the Preservation of the provincial moratoria on lions of salmon. It is a major migration route Offshore Oil and Gas Moratorium’s written sub- for Grey and Humpback whales, in fact, the area mission. This consultation process has the ap- offshore oil and gas develop- supports more than 6,500 marine species. pearance of solely advancing oil proponents’ views ment. Our research has shown Marine tourism has been the fastest growing while ignoring the concerns of First Nations, fish- segment of the tourism industry and is quickly ermen, conservation organizations and tourism that the offshore oil and gas becoming an important part of BC’s economy. operators. Over 10,000 commercial fishing jobs are de- industry poses a threat to the pendent on the health of these waters. Pro- In May 2000, LOS attended the conference “Ex- tecting this area is important. ploring the Future of Offshore Oil and Gas Devel- health of our ocean, the opment in BC: Lessons from the Atlantic” hosted For many years the BC coast has been protected by Simon Fraser University and funded by the commercial and recreational by federal and provincial moratoria prohibit- federal and provincial governments. It was clear ing the exploration and development of off- the oil industry consultants are interested in lift- fishing industries, the emerg- shore oil and gas. This policy is a result of ing the moratoria. However First Nation individu- both governments’ concern for the health of als who were present clearly stated that they ing ecotourism industry, and our ocean and Living Oceans Society supports oppose any extraction of oil from their territo- the present policy. rial waters. The provincial and federal govern- the complex coastal ments and First Nation’s representatives do not A downturn in BC’s resource based economy, agree on who has jurisdiction over potential oil ecosystem. however, has some advocating the lifting of and gas reserves. the moratoria. In fact, pressure by oil devel- opment interests has resulted in BC’s Northern The closed-door process of the Northern Devel- Development Commissioner hiring SanLaing opment Office and the conference at SFU have Consultants to carry out consultations to de- both been platforms for industry proponents to termine interest in offshore oil and gas devel- discuss possible economic gains from offshore oil opment. Although the final results of the and gas. So far there have been few opportuni- closed-door consultations have yet to be re- ties to discuss the costs associated with oil and leased, consultant John Sanderson is already gas development. LOS research shows overwhelm- predicting that the people in northern BC want ing evidence of risks associated with this indus- to “develop a consensus based process that try. This newsletter highlights this research and looks at the lifting of the moratoria”. It is im- provides sources for further readings. If you portant to note that the consultant handpicked would like further information, all the papers ref- the participants in this process and not all the erenced in this newsletter are available from LOS. information was included in the interim report Fish Farm Fiasco page 3 Sounds Like Trouble page 5 Super Glue Barnacles page 6 From the Executive Director This issue of our newsletter focuses on offshore oil and gas develop- Living Oceans Society is a non-profit organization ment. For over a year now Living Oceans Society has been supporting committed to the preservation of marine biological the existing offshore oil and gas moratoria despite the efforts of some diversity and creation of sustainable fisheries to see it lifted. We believe that both the federal and provincial gov- through the establishment of a network of marine ernments showed great foresight in putting these moratoria in place protected areas and ecosystem management of our in the 1970’s. Removing them would be a step backwards. Our re- ocean. searcher Oonagh O’Connor has uncovered many risks associated with The vision of the Living Oceans Society is to ensure oil and gas development. We hope this information helps you make a choice about the future of all stakeholders are part of marine conservation ef- BC’s coast. forts. By working with stakeholders, participating in multi-stakeholder processes, organizing workshops In the future each newsletter will be dedicated to a new subject. Our fall newsletter will high- and sharing information about our projects, Living light the people and places of the Central Coast region of BC, a place very dear to all of us at Oceans Society is part of the movement to build new Living Oceans Society. In addition we will have our regular columns such as Wave Reviews, Sea approaches to conserving the health of our ocean. Stories, and Feature Creature as well as updates on all Living Oceans Society activities. LOS Projects Advance If you have any issues or places that you would like to see highlighted please let us know. Your • The science of conservation biology • Ecological and economic sustainability views are important to us. • Co-management with stakeholders & First Nations Sincerely, • People as part of the environment Jennifer Lash • The resolution of land claims The BC Alliance for the Preservation of A CALL the Offshore Oil and Gas Moratoria is FOR ACTION made up of 60 members from conserva- tion, labour, social justice If you’re concerned about the government and First Nations groups. The Alliance lifting the moratoria on offshore oil and gas, supports the existing moratoria on Living Oceans Society let Premier Ujjal Dosanjh know that you offshore oil and gas British Columbia. If Box 166 support the government maintaining the you Sointula, BC want to join the Alliance contact LOS at current policy. Write to him today! V0N 3E0 [email protected] Office of the Premier phone 250-973-6580 Parliament Buildings fax 250-973-6581 Victoria, BC [email protected] V8V 1X4 www.livingoceans.org Living Oceans Society in Action MPA Outreach Staff News Recently back from the Northern leg of his MPA tour, Bruce Burrows, MPA Outreach Coordinator, reports a successful journey. The tour involved trips to Prince Rupert, Masset, Queen Charlotte LOS welcomes Elicia Harris on board as our new City, and Bella Coola to discuss the fisheries benefits of marine protected areas. Several themes Executive Assistant to Jennifer Lash. She is help- emerged from the meetings; ing ease Jen’s load and is taking on many admin- • involving fishermen in the identification and management of MPAs, istrative duties such as payroll, running our di- • clearly defining MPAs to allow fishermen to assess the costs and benefits rect mail program, and making sure our office • incorporating the use of local and traditional knowledge has the supplies we need. She is also searching While in Haida Gwaii Bruce had the opportunity to meet with Russ Jones, MPA Advisor for the for funding sources and trying her hand at pro- Haida Nation and Guujaaw, Elected President of the Council of Haida Nations. They emphasized posal writing. We’re glad to have Elicia aboard that First Nations must be a major player in the establishment and management of MPAs and and relieved someone will be around to fill out there is concern about the ramifications for sea and land claims. the paycheques while Jen is on maternity leave. The most recent meeting was held in Sointula and the feedback was positive with support in If you need to contact Jennifer while she is on principle for MPAs but concerns were expressed about the details of establishing MPAs from a political perspective. A proposal to draw lines on a chart as a first step to establishing func- leave please do not hesitate to call or email Elicia tioning MPAs was suggested for the next meeting. Bruce will continue his tour to southern at [email protected]. Elicia will make sure communities in the fall after the fishing season is over. that Jennifer gets your message. 2 COASTAL COMMUNITY OUTREACH Fish Farm Fiasco Living Oceans Society is not alone in our ef- The Broughton Archipelago, a cluster of islands located between the forts to ensure the oceans continue to sus- north end of Vancouver Island and the Mainland, continues to be a hot tain coastal communities. From Alaska to Baja California there are fishing organizations, en- spot in the battle against open cage fish farms. The Provincial Govern- vironmentalists, scientists and even a few cou- ment is seeking public input on four additional sites in the Broughton. rageous government types struggling with old The area is already inundated with farms and is now expected to and new, approaches which respect the oceans accommodate farms that are being moved out of their present loca- and the ecological limits of her bounty. tions for a variety of reasons. One conflicts with a logging operation, one can’t meet environmental standards, and others are apparently un- Recently LOS Coastal Community Outreach Co- popular with their upland neighbours. ordinator, Aaron Tinker, joined people from At Living Oceans Society we have identified the ecologically sensitive up and down the coast at a gathering in La areas in the Broughton Archipelago by using the provincial govern- Paz, Mexico on the Sea of Cortes. The topic: ment’s 1999 Salmon Aquaculture Policy siting criteria. According to conservation efforts to conserve and restore the once abundant and healthy marine eco- our mapping and analysis, the new sites contravene the government’s systems of the west coast of North America.
Recommended publications
  • Captive Orcas
    Captive Orcas ‘Dying to Entertain You’ The Full Story A report for Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society (WDCS) Chippenham, UK Produced by Vanessa Williams Contents Introduction Section 1 The showbiz orca Section 2 Life in the wild FINgerprinting techniques. Community living. Social behaviour. Intelligence. Communication. Orca studies in other parts of the world. Fact file. Latest news on northern/southern residents. Section 3 The world orca trade Capture sites and methods. Legislation. Holding areas [USA/Canada /Iceland/Japan]. Effects of capture upon remaining animals. Potential future capture sites. Transport from the wild. Transport from tank to tank. “Orca laundering”. Breeding loan. Special deals. Section 4 Life in the tank Standards and regulations for captive display [USA/Canada/UK/Japan]. Conditions in captivity: Pool size. Pool design and water quality. Feeding. Acoustics and ambient noise. Social composition and companionship. Solitary confinement. Health of captive orcas: Survival rates and longevity. Causes of death. Stress. Aggressive behaviour towards other orcas. Aggression towards trainers. Section 5 Marine park myths Education. Conservation. Captive breeding. Research. Section 6 The display industry makes a killing Marketing the image. Lobbying. Dubious bedfellows. Drive fisheries. Over-capturing. Section 7 The times they are a-changing The future of marine parks. Changing climate of public opinion. Ethics. Alternatives to display. Whale watching. Cetacean-free facilities. Future of current captives. Release programmes. Section 8 Conclusions and recommendations Appendix: Location of current captives, and details of wild-caught orcas References The information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of last publication: 30th April 2001. Some information is inevitably date-sensitive: please notify the author with any comments or updated information.
    [Show full text]
  • If You Are a Conscientious Consumer, You May Look for Sustainable Seafood Labels When Buying Fish Or Ordering Seafood in a Restaurant
    If you are a conscientious consumer, you may look for sustainable seafood labels when buying fish or ordering seafood in a restaurant. You may look for the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label when buying tuna in the grocery store, for example. You may even use the Vancouver Aquarium’s Ocean Wise or Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch apps to tell you which restaurants use eco-certified seafood suppliers. And you may be forgiven for sometimes getting confused. There is such a welter of eco-labelling and recommendation programs for seafood these days – some of them conflicting with each other – that it can be hard for the average consumer to know which to trust, especially given the mislabelling and outright fraud that have been identified by eco-watchdogs like Oceana. Fraser River sockeye? Good, say the MSC and Ocean Wise. Bad, says the Greenpeace red list. B.C. farmed Atlantic salmon? Good, says the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC). Bad, say SeaChoice and Ocean Wise. Meanwhile, Seafood Watch puts B.C. farmed Atlantic salmon somewhere in between, with a yellow rating, meaning it is a “good alternative” to other farmed or wild salmon that may not be as sustainable. Karen Wristen of the Living Oceans Society, one of the partners in the SeaChoice program – which last year got out of consumer labelling to focus on working directly with retailers – said SeaChoice and its partner organizations continue to recommend MSC- and ASC-certified products, although they have concerns about both allowing “non-conformities with standards” to remain unresolved. SeaChoice disagrees, for example, with the ASC’s recent certification of B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Fish Secure Future: An
    Sustainable Fish Secure Food od Su Seafo pply C ild ha W in e on th V of a t n n co e u m s v s e e r s I s s l A a n n d A s W ie it er h sh a F Fi oc le us nab on Local Sustai 1 Acknowledgements LOS would like to thank the McConnell Foundation for their generous support to fund this assessment. Ken Meter from Crossroads Resource Center was invaluable in providing insight to the development of survey instruments and helping to analyze the results. This assessment would not have been possible without the fishing associations and companies that wrote letters of support in proposing this project, and the time and thoughtful consideration they offered in completing the surveys and participating in interviews. We express our appreciation to: the Canadian Highly Migratory Species Foundation, the Canadian Pacific Sardine Association, the Canadian Sablefish Association, the West Coast Scallop Harvesters Association and the Pacific Prawn Fishermen’s Association. Thank you to the Ocean Wise program for reaching out to their Vancouver Island partners to participate. LOS also thanks all the individual suppliers, retailers, chefs and fishermen for their insights and responses which helped it to assess the current seafood supply chain on Vancouver Island. The report would not have been possible without their generosity in sharing their time, information and stories. Any shortcomings, oversights or errors remain with the Living Oceans Society staff who worked on this assessment: Kelly Roebuck, Will Soltau and Mary Lindsay. Cover photo credits Prawn fisherman: Living Oceans Society B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Oceans Society and Raincoast Conservation Foundation Hearing Order OH-001-2014 File OF-Fac-Oil-T260-2013-0302
    Living Oceans Society and Raincoast Conservation Foundation Hearing Order OH-001-2014 File OF-Fac-Oil-T260-2013-0302 NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF the National Energy Board Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. N- 7, as amended, (“NEB Act”) and the Regulations made thereunder; AND IN THE MATTER OF THE Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012, S.C., c. 19, s. 52, as amended and the Regulations made thereunder; AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC as General Partner of Trans Mountain Pipeline L.P. (collectively “Trans Mountain”) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and other related approvals pursuant to Part III of the NEB Act. FINAL ARGUMENT OF LIVING OCEANS SOCIETY AND RAINCOAST CONSERVATION FOUNDATION January 12, 2016 _______________________ Date submitted Dyna Tuytel, Karen Campbell and Margot Venton Barristers and Solicitors Representatives for Living Oceans Society and Raincoast Conservation Foundation 900 – 1000 5th Ave. SW Calgary, AB T2P 4V1 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] PART I - Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 A) Living Oceans Society and Raincoast Conservation Foundation’s position ............... 1 B) About Living Oceans and Raincoast ............................................................................ 2 PART II - The legal requirements governing this Project Review ....................................... 2 A) The NEB Act requires the Board to evaluate
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE SeaChoice partners with Overwaitea Food Group on bold sustainable seafood project FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 11, 2009 VANCOUVER – A new collaboration between the Overwaitea Food Group and SeaChoice, Canada’s national seafood program, is making it easier for Canadians to buy seafood that promotes healthy oceans. Renowned environmentalist David Suzuki appeared at the partnership’s unveiling today at a Save-On-Foods store in Vancouver. “The future health of our oceans depends on our ability to protect wild fish stocks and the marine environments they live in,” Dr. Suzuki said. “To help achieve this, we need retailers to provide customers with sustainable seafood and stop selling unsustainable products.” The Overwaitea Food Group, which operates 117 stores across 80 communities in Western Canada, is one of North America’s first grocery retailers to commit to a sustainable seafood policy. As part of that policy, OFG is working with SeaChoice to develop and implement a six- point sustainability plan for the procurement and sale of seafood in its stores. The retailer has committed to: • offering customers sustainable seafood options and reducing procurement of unsustainable seafood • providing transparency and traceability information on seafood products they sell • openly collecting and sharing information regarding OFG’s sustainability practices • educating its team members, suppliers and customers on sustainable seafood • encouraging policymakers to improve and develop laws and regulations that support sustainability • ensuring a sustainable future for seafood stocks “This agreement between SeaChoice and the Overwaitea Food Group represents a major milestone along the path to achieving healthy oceans,” said Bill Wareham, SeaChoice representative and marine conservation specialist with the David Suzuki Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Committing to Effective Marine Protected Areas
    committing to effectivemarine protected areas Illustrations: Laura Timmermans; icons: Document by Maximilian Becker; Meeting by Scott Lewis, both from The Noun Project Photo: Rowan Trebilco Rowan Photo: summary British Columbians expect their province to be well-managed, especially the marine environment. They want marine protected areas (MPAs) that provide excellent ecological, economic and social benefits. To achieve these goals, MPAs must be no well-designed and well-managed. plan Identifying and designating sites to build a marine protected area (MPA) network are just the first steps toward realizing the benefits of MPAs. The next steps are to: • build support among local communities and marine users has a • name who will govern the MPA and how governance will be organized plan • develop a management plan to monitor and research MPA effectiveness • support ongoing stewardship and enforce regulations In today’s world, a single government can’t do it alone. Governments must partner with in canada’s pacific each other, and with local communities. Working together can build and enforce effective 148 of 197 MPAs hAve MPA networks that help boost local economies. With commitment — and creativity — it can be done. approved managementno plan governments must commit to making mpas work Photo: Tanaka Juuyoh via Flickr Juuyoh Tanaka Photo: steps to effective mpas Effective MPAs need the Current B.C. MPAs seriously A need for commitment following to achieve their lacking Collaborative processes involving federal, intended benefits: Most existing MPAs in B.C. lack manage- provincial and First Nations governments • Governance systems that clarify ment or enforcement, rendering them are recommending a network of MPAs.
    [Show full text]
  • (Orcinus Orca) Off the West Coast of Canada
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2012/155 Document de recherche 2012/155 Pacific Region Région du Pacifique Information in Support of the Renseignements à l'appui de la Identification of Critical Habitat for désignation de l'habitat essentiel des Transient Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) épaulards migrateurs (Orcinus orca) au off the West Coast of Canada large de la côte Ouest canadienne John K.B. Ford Eva H. Stredulinsky Jared R. Towers Graeme M. Ellis Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station 3190 Hammond Bay Road, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7 Canada This series documents the scientific basis for the La présente série documente les fondements evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in scientifiques des évaluations des ressources et Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the des écosystèmes aquatiques du Canada. Elle day in the time frames required and the traite des problèmes courants selon les documents it contains are not intended as échéanciers dictés. Les documents qu’elle definitive statements on the subjects addressed contient ne doivent pas être considérés comme but rather as progress reports on ongoing des énoncés définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais investigations. plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ ISSN 1919-5044 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2013 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What's at Stake?
    WHAT’SThe Cost of Oil on British AT Columbia’s STAKE? Priceless Coast www.raincoast.org Suggested citation Raincoast Conservation Foundation. 2010. What’s at Stake? The cost of oil on British Columbia’s priceless coast. Raincoast Conservation Foundation. Sidney, British Columbia. Ver 02-10, pp 1-64 © 2010 Raincoast Conservation Foundation ISBN: 978-0-9688432-5-3 About Raincoast Conservation Foundation: Raincoast is a team of conservationists and scientists empowered by our research to protect the lands, waters and wildlife of coastal British Columbia. We use peer-reviewed science and grassroots activism to further our conservation objectives. Our vision for coastal British Columbia is to protect the habitats and resources of umbrella species. We believe this approach will help ensure the survival of all species and ecological processes that exist at different scales. Our mandate: Investigate. Inform. Inspire. We Investigate to understand coastal species and processes. We Inform by bringing science to decision makers and communities. We Inspire action to protect wildlife and their wilderness habitats. Sidney Office Mailing Address P.O. Box 2429 Sidney, BC Canada V8L 3Y3 250-655-1229 www.raincoast.org Field Station Mailing Address P.O. Box 77 Denny Island, B.C. Canada V0T 1B0 Photography: as noted Design: Beacon Hill Communications Group i WHAT’S AT STAKE? THE COST OF OIL ON BRITSH COLUMBIA’S PRICELESS COAST Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch® Standard for Salmonidsalmon Fisheries Table of Contents Seafood Watch Ratings
    1 Seafood Watch® Standard for SalmonidSalmon Fisheries Table of Contents Seafood Watch Ratings ............................................................................................................................ 2 Seafood Watch Guiding Principles ............................................................................................................ 2 Seafood Watch Criteria for Salmon Fisheries ............................................................................................. 5 Criterion 1 – Impacts of the Fishery on the Stock for which you want a Recommendation .......................... 8 Factor 1.1 Abundance ........................................................................................................................... 8 Factor 1.2 Fishing Mortality ................................................................................................................ 18 Criterion 2 – Impacts on Other Capture Species ....................................................................................... 20 Factor 2.1 Abundance ......................................................................................................................... 22 Factor 2.2 Fishing Mortality ................................................................................................................ 26 Factor 2.3 Modifying Factor: Discards and Bait Use ........................................................................... 30 Criterion 3 – Effectiveness of Fishery Management ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Financing Options for a Marine Protected Area Network In
    PHOTO: MARILYN MCCLELLAND Sustainable Financing Options for a Marine Protected Area Network in British Columbia Sustainable Financing Options for a Marine Protected Area Network in British Columbia Contents Introduction . 3 Falling Short . 4 Public Funding . 4 Public-Private Partnerships (P3) . 5 Case Study: The California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative . 6 Private Donations . 7 Case Study: The Arctic Home Campaign . 7 Payment for Ecosystem Services . 8 Blue Carbon Offsets . 8 Marine Bioprospecting Fees . 10 Resource Use Fees . 10 Case Study: User Fees in Bonaire National Marine Park . 11 Community and First Nations Management . 12 Case Study: Gwaii Hanaas National Marine Conservation Area . 13 Conclusion . 14 Appendix 1: Summary Table . 15 Work Cited . 16 We gratefully acknowldege the generous support of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation which has made this report possible. Vancouver Office Sointula Office #207-343 Railway St. 235 First Street, Box 320 Vancouver, BC V6A 1A4 Sointula, BC V0N 3E0 604-696-5044 250-973-6580 www.livingoceans.org | [email protected] Sustainable Financing Options for a Marine Protected Area Network in British Columbia Introduction Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are one of the most effective tools to conserve and protect marine biodiversity . There are many different types of MPAs, but all are ocean places that are set aside like parks through legislative or other means for the purpose of providing sanctuary for individual species and entire food-webs so they can recover and thrive . When planned and man- aged effectively, MPAs can shield ecosystems from harmful human practices such as destructive fishing practices, offshore oil and gas drilling and other industrial activities; they mitigate the impacts of climate change by protecting coastal and estuarine areas that serve as carbon sinks; they benefit the economies of coastal communities through businesses such as marine tourism and sustainable fisheries .
    [Show full text]
  • Aug 99 Newsletter
    Living Oceans Society Newsletter No. 1 August 1999 Baja to B.C. to Bristol Bay Living Oceans Society works towards a network of marine protected area for the Pacific Coast of North America OCEAN CREATURES ARE NOT GUIDED BY POLITICAL According to the Food and Agriculture habitat for many species including rockfish. Organization of the United Nations (FAO), almost BOUNDARIES. The magnificent grey whales migrate 70% of marine fish are now over fished. In BC the from Baja, Mexico to the waters of Alaska, Living Oceans Society believes that a network of abalone fishery is closed and the rockfish California Sea Lions follow the herring north to BC marine protected areas, with a core of no-take populations are declining precipitously. In in the spring, and the endangered Pacific Smelt areas, from Baja to BC to Bristol Bay will help Washington state some stocks of salmon have been range from southern California to BC’s Central rebuild fish stocks, conserve biological diversity, be declared endangered and in Mexico the Coast. In addition, rockfish nursery areas in the and provide insurance against the failure of processing facilities are operating at only 50% of Strait of Georgia produce juveniles that live the fisheries management policies. their capacity. rest of their life in the Strait of Juan de Fuca , sea turtles born on the southern tip of Baja Mexico The establishment of a network MPAs on the become an importantBristol part of the California Pacific Coast of North America is a lofty goal and not one that can be accomplished easily or ecosystem, and salmon born in BC rivers will pass British Canada by any one organization.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Shaun White
    www.livingoceans.org 2013 ANNUAL REPORT SHAUN WHITE Table of Contents About Living Oceans | 3 Letter from the Executive Director | 4 Letter from the Chair | 5 Marine Planning and Protected Areas | 6 Mapping and Analysis| 8 Energy and Climate Change | 10 Sustainable Seafood and Fisheries | 12 Salmon Farming | 15 Clear The Coast | 16 Donors and Supporters | 18 Staff and Board | 18 Financials | 19 COVER PHOTOS, TOP TO BOTTOM: MARIE O’SHAUGHNESSY, J.G. BROUWER, JANNA NICHOLS, MATT CASSELMAN Living Oceans ~ 2 About Living Oceans Society For most of our fifteen-year history, Living Oceans marine conservation work has been grounded in the North and Central Pacific Coast, the waters we call home. In 2013 we changed course and set our sights on playing a greater a role on the national stage. We haven’t in any sense abandoned home waters—we understand that our strength has always come from being based in a small coastal community where local knowledge grounds our work in reality. We realize, though, that our highly specialized knowledge about the ocean can help communities that depend on a healthy ocean on Canada’s other coasts. Our new national course was reflected by the winner of our 2013 Ocean Exposure’s Photo Contest which was taken in Repulse Bay, Nunavut. This is the fourth year we’ve run the con- test which has given us a marvellous collection of marine photos from all three of Canada’s coasts, plus other countries with coastlines around the world. BRIANNE RANTA 2013 Annual Report ~ 3 Letter from the Executive Director If the year 2012 is remembered as the worst on record for environmental protection in Canada, the year 2013 may be most memorable for the remarkable progress we chalked up in spite of it all.
    [Show full text]