Downloads.Usda.Library.Cornell.Edu/Usda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloads.Usda.Library.Cornell.Edu/Usda FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A VERTICAL FARM AS A SOCIAL ENTERPRISE IN POMONA, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science In Regenerative Studies By José Wilfredo Mejía 2020 SIGNATURE PAGE THESIS: FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A VERTICAL FARM AS A SOCIAL ENTERPRISE IN POMONA, CALIFORNIA AUTHOR: José Wilfredo Mejía DATE SUBMITTED: Spring 2020 John T. Lyle Center for Regenerative Studies/ College of Environmental Design. Steven Archambault, Ph. D. Thesis Committee Chair College of Agriculture Agribusiness & Food Industry __________________________ Management/Agriculture Science Aaron Fox, Ph.D. __________________________ Department of Plant Science Olukemi Sawyerr, Ph.D. Office of Academic Innovation __________________________ Division of Academic Affairs ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank God first. I would like to thank my mother, Telma Ramírez who has been the one who has helped me from the time I decided to take on this challenge. My mother taught me to face my fears and challenges with vigor. There are no words to describe how much I appreciate her and how much I love her for always being there for me when I needed her. I would also like to thank my sister, Rosaura Mejía who without hesitation helped me on a very critical time during the first year of Master’s program, she moved to Los Angeles to babysit my sons for a whole month while I attended school, if she wouldn’t have come, I would have been forced to drop out. I would also like to thank my aunt, Sandra Castro for allowing my kids and I to live in her house when we became homeless. I like to also thank my twin sons, Marsello and Maximiliano for always cheering me up when I needed it, for understanding my frustrations and always smiling with whatever life threw at us. I thank my brother Kevin Bovee for his encouragement and support. I thank my committee, Dr. Olukemi Sawyerr and Dr. Aaron Fox for sticking with me and taking the time from their busy schedules to help me in my academic endeavors. I would also like thank Jill, Karen, Debbie, Dr. Brown, Dr. La Roche, Dr. Bahr, Patricia and Dr. Smith, they all played a vital role in the completion of this degree, whether they know it or not. Special thanks to Dr. Steven Archambault for taking on the role no one else was willing to take on, as the chairperson to my thesis committee halfway through the process, he gave me hope when I didn’t have any, thank you. iii ABSTRACT This case study is a proposal for an urban vertical farm as a social enterprise, in Pomona, Los Angeles County, California. The goal of the study is to create a detailed and focused plan on how to start and maintain a successful social enterprise. The approach takes the two most common types of urban agriculture and combines them into a hybrid organization. A community garden (nonprofit) model it’s combined with a vertical farms (for-profit) model, creating a hybrid model (Kaufman, 2000). Utilizing the strength and minimizing weaknesses, it is projected to lead to the formation of an economically sustainable and socially conscious enterprise. The opportunity for innovation lies on the fact that both current models have challenges. Part of the study focuses on the reasons why to establish a social enterprise model in an urban setting. A full business plan is also provided to expand the possibilities of the model and it also includes strategies on how to target intended markets. Using case studies, a financial analysis provides information on the break-even point and the required financial goals. Financial analysis also includes the first six years balance sheet, providing necessary data to determine ROI Return on investment. It analyzes social challenges: lack of jobs, good food; affordability, availability, education and community involvement. The study is intended to be a tool for investors, entrepreneurs, city planners and residents researching the possibilities of a vertical farm as a business and/or a social benefit or a combination of the two. The study evaluates and analyzes potential strategies proven to have worked in other studies and real-life models. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature page..……….…………………….……………………………….………….ii Acknowledgements.…………………………………………………………………….iii Abstract.…………………………………………...……………………………...……..iv List of tables……………………………………………...…….……………………......vi List of figures.……………………………………...…………….…………...……......viii Chapter 1 Introduction....……………………………….….…………………..............1 Chapter 2 Literature review and background information...……….…….…………17 Chapter 3 Economic development challenges in Pomona...…….......…….………80 Chapter 4 Business plan.…………….………………………………………………..97 Chapter 5 Discussion and conclusion.…………………………………….………..166 References.……………….……………….…………………………….……………175 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1. City of Pomona Youth Characteristics……………………………….…….83 Table 2. City of Pomona Elderly Characteristics...………………………………....85 Table 3. City of Pomona Education Characteristics……………………….….…….88 Table 4. City of Pomona Employment Characteristics……………………………...89 Table 5. City of Pomona Household Characteristics………………………............90 Table 6. Pomona Income Characteristics…………………………………….……..91 Table 7. Plant parameters….…………………………………………….…….…....108 Table 8. Crop Growth Area……………………………………………….……...….109 Table 9. Summary of Power and Energy consumption of all subsystem……….144 Table 10. Seed costs per year of the plant………………………………………….147 Table 11. Nutrient, fish feed and water consumption and cost………….……….150 Table 12. Edible biomass yield for the VF crops (monocrop) case production....152 Table 13. Initial non-recurring cost with 20% margin………………………….…..153 Table 14. Initial cost & repayment with 20% margin analysis…………………….154 Table 15. Recurring Costs……………………………………………………...……154 Table 16. Production capacity: Sky Greens & DLR………………………….……155 Table 17. Analysis of minimum requirement……………………………………….155 Table 18. Tabulation of expenses vs. fixed price…………………………………..155 Table 19. Lettuce: Year one projected sales & cost / Data 2018 USDA………..157 Table 20. Six years projections………………………………………………...……158 Table 21. Net Present value (20 years).…………………………………………….158 vi Table 22. Annual Consumption, Production and Subsidies for 4,245 Residents.161 Table 23. Recurring costs of Small Empty Lots Vertical Farms…………………..164 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Hydroponics inner workings.………………………………………………53 Figure 2. Aeroponics inner Workings.………………………………...……………..55 Figure 3. Opportunity Zone.…………………………………………………………118 Figure 4. Map of location 246 E. Center St, Pomona, CA.………………………119 Figure 5. Blueprint of Location chosen for facility.…………………………..……121 Figure 6. Vertical Farm floor distribution…………………………………………..138 Figure 7. Outer and inner structures of DLR vertical farm study………………..139 Figure 8. Rendition of Sky Greens inner workings.………………………………141 viii CHAPTER 1 Introduction General problems In the decades to come, conventional agricultural practices will have forced us to deal with the consequences of human beings who considered only the best interests of their own species. Conventional agriculture and farming have been the status quo for the last century, with little to no change. The changes that have been implemented have been primarily for the purpose of increasing production and reducing expenses (Lyle, 1994). The side effects of such practices have become all too familiar: among them are problems with ecological and environmental justice, the lack of fair social development on the global scale, the dependency on fossil fuels, the lack of interest in sustainable innovations, the disregard of issues of food insecurity, and the correlation with poverty and inequality (Besthorn, 2013). Global warming, elevated frequency of cataclysmic natural disasters such as hurricanes, and the connection between the environment and economic decline are, according to Besthorn, a result of humans’ environmental manipulation in the interest of producing more food (Besthorn, 2013). Although conventional agriculture provides food for the masses, it has severely affected humanity’s connection to one another and to nature. The concepts and practices of conventional agriculture continue to threaten the ecological carrying capacity of the planet, thus making the future of all species uncertain. 1 Although the side effects are many and they all demand immediate worldwide attention, one has become the most pressing and immediate concern for communities around the world—affecting underdeveloped, developing, and developed countries just the same. According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UNFAO), the greatest challenge humanity is currently facing is the insecurity of safe, adequate, timely, healthy, and affordable food (UNFAO, 2011). This feasibility study suggests, presents, and compares regenerative sustainable concepts and practical applications in the conventional system of food production and distribution. The study proposes a possible alternative to alleviate, improve, and raise awareness of healthy food insecurity in low-income communities in the United States. Regenerative sustainability concepts are innovative solutions to challenges such as that mentioned above. The solutions take into consideration all stakeholders in the matter and, as a result, produce a model capable of resolving the problem while maintaining balance in the environment (Lyle, 1994). Regenerative sustainability concept Regenerative sustainability can
Recommended publications
  • Linda Sierra
    Jason D. Licamele, Ph.D. P.O. Box 25035 / Scottsdale, AZ 85255 [email protected] Agriculture & Biological Systems Engineer Keywords: biotechnology, agriculture, aquaculture, fisheries, plant production, natural products, bioenergy, bioprocessing, ecosystems, food science, greenhouse engineering, horticulture, hydroponics, fisheries, algae, environment, natural resources, water resources, bioprospecting, sustainability - Biological systems engineer, marine biologist, ecologist, environmental scientist, and biotechnologist with commercial operations and research experience leading, designing, developing, executing, and managing projects. - Innovative applied scientist and engineer with a multitude of skills, a patent portfolio, over 20 years of commercial experience in the aquaculture, agriculture, food, and bioenergy industries with a focus on environmental sustainability and resource management. - Experienced entrepreneur and consultant effectively developing global relationships with business, legal, non- governmental organizations, academic, and government organizations via strong communication, interpersonal skills, leadership qualities, and dedication to mission. - Skilled in project design, project management, experimental design, data management, and data translation with a unique ability to critically analyze and effectively communicate information to all levels of audiences. - Professional scientist and engineer with experience in business, production, research and development, intellectual property development, technology
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Aquaponics
    Trends in Aquaponics Chris Hartleb University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Northern Aquaculture Demonstration Facility Aquaponics Innovation Center Aquaponics • Integrated & soilless • Continuous year-round • Free of biocides production • Conservative use of water, space & • Meets socio-economic challenges labor – Urban, peri-urban, rural • Produces both vegetable & protein crop – Locavore movement Aquaponic Systems UVI Design Fish tanks Raft tank Water pump Clarifier (solids filter) Degassing tank Mineralization tanks & biofilter Air pump Plant Production Systems • Raft (Revised agriculture float technology) – Deep water culture • Large volume water • Root aeration • Nutrient uptake: High • Media based – Biofiltration in media – Clogging & cleaning present – Nutrient uptake: High • Nutrient film technique – Low volume water – Less system stability – Nutrient uptake: Low Modified Designs • Vertical farming – Living walls – Vertical • Robotics • Complete artificial light Who’s Growing using Aquaponics? Love, Fry, Li, Hill, Genello, Simmons & Thompson. 2015. Commercial aquaponics production and profitability: Findings from an international survey. Aquaculture 435:67-74. How Many is That? • Limited survey response • Most likely underestimated number and location Types of Aquaponics • Scalable: – Hobby and Home food production – Farmers market food production – Social & Community systems – Commercial food production – Education – Research Aquaculture North America January/February 2018 • Trends driving the seafood sector – Climate change impact
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Suitable Substrate for Optimal Crop Growth Under
    Journal of Scientific Agriculture 2018,2: 62-65 doi: 10.25081/jsa.2018.v2.860 http://updatepublishing.com/journals/index.php/jsa ISSN: 2184-0261 R E VIEW A RTICLE SUITABLE SUBSTRATE FOR OPTIMAL CROP GROWTH UNDER PROTECTED FARMS–AN ASSESSMENT AMARESH SARKAR*, MRINMOY MAJUMDER Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Agartala, PIN-799046, Tripura, India ABSTRACT An attempt has been made in this paper, to review crop growing substrates for protected farms. Optimal substrate type and volume for different crops cultivar is different. Substrate selection is a critical factor for optimal production of high-quality vegetables. Crop root orientation and depth determine the type and volume of substrate required which is very important for optimal crop growth and maximum profit. Growing crops on substrates in protected skyscrapers would not only mitigate the need for more land, it produces growing space vertically. Keywords: Substrate, Nutrient solution, Controlled environment agriculture INTRODUCTION structure can also be constructed on non-cultivable soil and urban roof-tops [21]. The amount of solar radiation, Food need is increasing globally as the inhabitants are which provides the energy to evaporate moisture from the increasing. Protected farming is a popular technique for substrate and the plant, is the major factor. Other growing vegetables all seasons regardless of location and important factors include air temperature, wind speed, and climate. The most innovative technology for plants humidity level [11]. The plant canopy size and shape growing in greenhouses is growing plants in mineral influences light absorption, reflection, and the rate at substrates such as rock wool, vermiculite, perlite, zeolite, which water evaporates from the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Paper on Aeroponics
    International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology (IJIET) http://dx.doi.org/10.21172/ijiet.134.06 Survey Paper on Aeroponics Ajay kumarD1, Namratha S.N2 1,2Assistant professor, Electronics and instrumentation, BMS college of Engineering, Bangalore, Karnataka, India Abstract- Almost all plants need soil for their growth. Nutrients present in soil help in the development of plants. Aeroponics is the method of growing plants in a medium without the use of soil. Here the plants are provided with a nutrient solution which circulates in the medium that holds the plant. The nutrient solution contains macronutrients and micronutrients which contribute to the healthy growth of plant. The Aeroponics is based on the opportunity of cultivating fruits & vegetables whose roots are not implanted in a bedrock (the case with hydroponics) or soil, but in ampules in which practices for spraying plant nutrition is delimited. In these containers, in our case pipe, roots can find the best ailment concerning oxygenation and moisture. These circumstances allow for healthier plant nutrition assimilation in a more balanced way, with consequential faster growth of the cultured plants. Keywords- Aeroponics, Hydroponics, Aquaponics, Aeroponics system, Aeroponics roots, Aeroponics growth. I. INTRODUCTION Aeroponics is the process of growing plants without using the substratum of soil. Aeroponics is a combination of two words „aero‟ and „ponic‟. „aero‟ meaning air and „ponic‟ meaning labour/growth. Therefore, aeroponics in whole suggests growing of plants in air. The plant is suspended in air using aeroponic system i.e. the roots are open and are in direct contact of air. Aeroponics culture varies from both the conformist hydroponics and aquaponics.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeroponics System of Cultivation in Horticultural Crops
    Vol.1 Issue-1, September,2020 Aeroponics System of Cultivation in Horticultural Crops Deeptimayee Sahoo Ph.D Research Scholar Dept. of Vegetable Sciences, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, BBSR, Odisha-751003 Mail- [email protected] ARTICLE ID: 007 Population of earth is expected to rise by 3 billion people. It is estimated that approximately 109 hectares of additional traditional land will be needed to feed them. Only 80% of the Earth’s arable land is suitable for farming now. A greater quantity of hectares with optimum inputs is needed every day to feed the rising population. This chain of high priority problems requires an improvement in the management of the use of resources so that human consumption has the priority in its use. To solve the problems mentioned, new farming methods have been searched, one of them being aeroponics. With this technique, the plants are held by certain structures that are maintained in a way that the roots are sustained up in the air. Aeroponic literally means “growing in air.” An aeroponic system is medium-less in that the roots of the plant are free hanging inside an open root-zone atmosphere. Aeroponics structure supplies optimum levels of water, nutrients and air to the growing chamber. Aeroponics is the process of growing plants in an air or mist environment without use of soil or an aggregate media. The word aeroponic is derived from the Latin word ‘aero’ (air) and ‘ponic’ means labour (work). This is an alternative method of soil-less culture in growth-controlled environments. The aeroponic culture technique is an optional device of soil-less culture in growth-controlled environments such as greenhouses.
    [Show full text]
  • A SWOT ANALYSIS of the VERTICAL FARM 2018, June 1
    BSC Thesis Name: Sanne van Asselt Registration number: 941120020100 Supervisor: J. H. Trienekens Chair group: Management Studies (MST) A SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE VERTICAL FARM 2018, June 1 Abstract The vertical farm is in its early state, leaving many questions unanswered and many open gaps in our current level of knowledge. There is at the moment not known what the opportunities and threats of a vertical farm are. To create more knowledge on vertical farms we conducted a SWOT analysis to answer the question: what are the most promising opportunities and most dangerous threats for the vertical farm? For the strengths we sought to find subjects that created a competitive advantage for the vertical farm by having a resource that greenhouse and conventional farm do not possess or any activity the vertical farm does better. For the weaknesses we looked for resources a vertical farm does not possess and activities a vertical farm is not doing well. Lastly the PESTLE analysis was used to find the opportunities and threats for the vertical farm. The high efficiency, the high quality, the innovative technology and the high costs are the most recurrent themes in the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the vertical farm. The results of the SWOT analysis show that there are two most promising opportunities and three most dangerous threats. The first most promising opportunity is the environmental opportunity. A vertical farm can become a circular economy and also energy efficient by further enhancing their innovative technology. The second opportunity is the economic opportunity, which is the niche market and selling opportunities (both) based on the high quality and high level of food safety of the crops grown in a vertical farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomonapp's Sensing & Monitoring of Plants/Fish & Water Quality for Ag
    Biomonapp’s Sensing & Monitoring of Plants/Fish & Water Quality for Ag Biotech & Bio Monitoring Environments Christine M. Cunningham Owner Advanced Bioscience Sustainable Solutions LLC. Chatham University Eden Hall Sustainable Campus 6035 Ridge Rd., Gibsonia PA 15044 ABSTRACT FIELD OF INVENTION Advanced Bioscience Sustainable Solution’s biomonapp for bio The present invention generally relates to computer applications monitoring environments, especially the aquaponics and in the area of monitoring the quality of water and soil, and bio hydroponics industry. [4] The app will connect with a sensor or species, specifically to improve the quality of plants and fish. photo spectrometer to show nutrition and crop yield data. We The mobile App is useful for the agbiotech companies and are currently licensing with Biodynamics in Akron to merge a farmers, hobbyist & academics to grow healthy plants & fish. sensor with Biomonapp, and bundle with solar kits, Back to the The app can analyze physiological nutritional changes Roots tanks, and Husky aquatanks. Biomonapp can track and according to variance in effecting variable factors. monitor diverse species of plants and fish. The Family Garden in Jamaica will monitor with the app and sensors to show crop BACKGROUND OF THE SUSTAINABLE FARMING and nutritional yield value, and track data in a local zoo. We are WHAT IS HYDROPONICS? consulting with the Lettuce Do Good People who sell lettuce kits. We will conduct a market sampling with 600 clients in the Almost any plant can grow with hydroponics. The two main plant and fish industry from IBIS world. Virtual simulations types of hydroponics are solution culture and medium culture.
    [Show full text]
  • A Uacu Ture In. T E Next Centu
    a uacu ture in. t enext centu opportunities for growth challenges of sustainability George Chamberlain Harald Rosenthal In the last decade, aquaculture has been the only growth sector within fisheries and the prospects for continued growth appear excellent. Global per capita seafood consumption has been rising steadily since 1969, but landings from the capture fisheries reached a plateau in 1989, leaving aquaculture as l -i., the primary source of seafood production to meet this increasing demand. A substantial portion of the global increase in aquaculture production has come from coastal en­ I vironments, but as the human population grows and I I! expand~ its involvement in the coastal zones, there i will be increasing pre~sure to share the coastal I t resources among multiple users. In this environment some of our existing aquaculture practices will not be sustainable in their present form, but those that are designed to accommodate multiple resource use could grow rapidly. Examples range from the tradi­ tional farming systems in Southeast Asia, which benefit the community at large as well as the aquaculturists themselves, to modern high-tech re­ circulation systems. World Aquaculture 26( 1) March 1995 21 s the aquaculture industry As the population expands, air, water, lamination by aquaculture species grows, conflicts over water use and land pollution will become more. These steps will protect the environ will "intensify and competition severe. Controls will be necessary to menl and safeguard the aquaculture in A mitigate the greenhouse effect, acid dustry. will develop among users of the limited coastal resources. rain, toxic waste accumulation and eu­ These anticipated restrictions shoull At the recent AQUATECH '94 Confer­ trophication of coastal waters, and be viewed by the aquaculture industr·.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Propagation for Successful Hydroponic Production
    Plant Propagation for Successful Hydroponic Production Hye-Ji Kim Assistant Professor of Sustainable Horticulture Crop Production Oct 14, 2017 What is Hydroponics? Hydroponics = hydros + ponos Water labor The cultivation of plants by placing the roots in liquid nutrient solutions rather than in soil; soilless growth of plants. Why hydroponics? . Crops can be produced on non-arable land including land with poor soils and/or high salinity levels. Efficient use of water and nutrients. High density planting = minimum use of land area. Year-round production. Local food. Direct and immediate control over the rhizosphere. Isolation from diseases or insect pests usually found in the soil. Higher yield, quality and storability of products. Ease of cleaning the systems. No weeding or cultivation is needed. Transplanting of seedlings is easy. Hydroponics Basics Types of Hydroponics: Water vs. Substrate-base Open vs. Closed Types of Hydroponics: Water vs. Substrate-base Water-based System Substrate-based System Deep water culture “Raft” system Ebb-and-flow Nutrient Film Techniques (NFT) Aeroponics Source: Chiwon Lee Drip irrigation Types of Hydroponics: Water vs. Substrate-base Water-based System Deep water culture “Raft” system Nutrient Film Techniques (NFT) Aeroponics Source: Chiwon Lee Source: hydrocentre.com.au Photos curtesy of Karlovec Media Group, Mobile channel system Facility of Great Lakes Growers, Burton, Ohio Types of Hydroponics: Water vs. Substrate-base Water-based System Deep water culture “Raft” system Nutrient Film Techniques (NFT) Aeroponics • Excellent aeration • 65% less water use than other Traveling plant, hydroponic systems Epcot Center, Disney World Source: http://www.mosesong.com/ Source: Chiwon Lee Source: Neiker-Tecnalia www.basqueresearch.com/new/2172 Source: Chiwon Lee Types of Hydroponics: Water vs.
    [Show full text]
  • LED Lighting Systems for Horticulture: Business Growth and Global Distribution
    sustainability Review LED Lighting Systems for Horticulture: Business Growth and Global Distribution Ivan Paucek 1, Elisa Appolloni 1, Giuseppina Pennisi 1,* , Stefania Quaini 2, Giorgio Gianquinto 1 and Francesco Orsini 1 1 DISTAL—Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Technologies, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (I.P.); [email protected] (E.A.); [email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (F.O.) 2 FEEM—Foundation Eni Enrico Mattei, 20123 Milano, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 August 2020; Accepted: 5 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: In recent years, research on light emitting diodes (LEDs) has highlighted their great potential as a lighting system for plant growth, development and metabolism control. The suitability of LED devices for plant cultivation has turned the technology into a main component in controlled or closed plant-growing environments, experiencing an extremely fast development of horticulture LED metrics. In this context, the present study aims to provide an insight into the current global horticulture LED industry and the present features and potentialities for LEDs’ applications. An updated review of this industry has been integrated through a database compilation of 301 manufacturers and 1473 LED lighting systems for plant growth. The research identifies Europe (40%) and North America (29%) as the main regions for production. Additionally, the current LED luminaires’ lifespans show 10 and 30% losses of light output after 45,000 and 60,000 working hours on average, respectively, while the 1 vast majority of worldwide LED lighting systems present efficacy values ranging from 2 to 3 µmol J− (70%).
    [Show full text]
  • Dry-Fog Aeroponics Affects the Root Growth of Leaf Lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L
    Original Paper Environ. Control Biol., 53 (4), 181187, 2015 DOI: 10.2525/ecb.53.181 Dry-fog Aeroponics Affects the Root Growth of Leaf Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Greenspan) by Changing the Flow Rate of Spray Fertigation Yosuke HIKOSAKA, Michio KANECHI, Mizuki SATO and Yuichi UNO Bioresource Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe , Hyogo 6578501, Japan (Received April 16, 2015; Accepted July 28, 2015) The growth characteristics and physiological activities of leaves and roots of lettuce cultivated in dry-fog aeroponics with different flow rates of nutrient dry-fog (FL, 1.0 m s1; NF, 0.1 m s1) were investigated under a controlled environment for two weeks and compared to lettuce cultivated using deep-flow technique (DFT). The growth of leaves of FL and DFT was not different and was significantly higher than that of NF. The amount of dry-fog particles adhering to the objects was higher in FL than in NF, so that the root growth in NF was significantly higher than that of FL. The respiration rate of roots was significantly higher in dry-fog aeroponics, but the dehydrogenase activity in the roots was significantly higher in DFT. There were no differences in the contents of chlorophyll and total soluble protein in the leaves or the specific leaf area. Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance were higher in dry-fog aeroponics. The contents of nitrate nitrogen, phosphate and potassium ions in the leaves were significantly higher in DFT, but the content of calcium ions was significantly higher in FL. Thus, changing the flow rate of the dry-fog in the rhizosphere can affect the growth and physiological activities of leaves and roots.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical Farming Sustainability and Urban Implications
    Master thesis in Sustainable Development 2018/32 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling Vertical Farming Sustainability and Urban Implications Daniela Garcia-Caro Briceño DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES INSTITUTIONEN FÖR GEOVETENSKAPER Master thesis in Sustainable Development 2018/32 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling Vertical Farming Sustainability and Urban Implications Daniela Garcia-Caro Briceño Supervisor: Cecilia Mark-Herbert Evaluator: Daniel Bergquist Copyright © Daniela Garcia-Caro Briceño, Published at Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (www.geo.uu.se), Uppsala, 2018 Content 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PROBLEM FORMULATION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 AIM ................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 OUTLINE ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. METHODS ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 RESEARCH APPROACH AND DESIGN ............................................................................................... 4 2.2 RESEARCH DELIMITATIONS ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]