DOCSLIB.ORG

Kluane National Park and Reserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kluane National Park and Reserve To Delta Junction To Tok and Fairbanks A r e y (Tok Cutoff) 1 v wa i gh L Wrangell-St. Elias Unpaved road Approximately 750,000 of the 13+ million R i H M National Park within park acres of land within the boundaries of a n Slana E n N Noyes Mtn A i n T Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve h le A 8147ft c G Ranger Station S T E T L I N L O W L A N D S Wrangell-St. Elias Other unpaved o T 2483m are non-federal lands belonging to Alaska t (summer only) A r s National Preserve road i S e Native Corporations, other private owners, h v C 2154ft Na i and the State of Alaska. Significant amounts R ) Native Corporation Trail 657m b e s n of these non-federal lands are located along n TETLIN NATIONAL Lands a K g na i 4 C Ro M bes i the McCarthy and Nabesna roads and along o ad O a N Chistochina p (u U N h the east bank of the Copper River. Please do p np ia WILDLIFE REFUGE R a ab NATIONAL e ve N (Na North not trespass. If you have questions, ask at i d A c r ) T A h r visitor centers or ranger stations. e I a v PRESERVE R N r i i d v R Jack S s e B o ( o r Lake N y n a d r Native Kendesnii t e s n 0 10 20 30 Kilometers H r 1 e Corporation ii H e Campground d r ) i v p i il n g i Land Copper C ls e p h v ig h R Capital o i i G x Ewan o Lake ) R 0 10 20 30 Miles w N u ? Lake a C Mountain Wellesley l a n k n Tanada y 7731ft a a a o Lake n a Mountain n k 2356m N s a a R a t 4960ft s G 3100ft i e 1512m R U e 945m h i Nabesna C h v NATIONAL PARK t e Private property T T r interspersed with Z A ( public lands. O Yukon Territory Sa Tanada Peak nf or 9240ft T Gakona d N Gulkana R 2816m k i Mount Sanford e Cooper I Alaska ve e r r Pass (Hwniindi K'ełt'aeni) a C N sin 16237ft ck Mount Allen G 4949m Ja (Ch ’ahk än’ Choh) 9480ft M R E 2890m E Mount Drum I O C A U (Hwdaandi K'ełt'aeni) L Mount W N ultoff 12010ft G a C Gordon B r To T Glennallen 3661m ee R 9040ft Anchorage iver A k R E 1 2755m 3318ft I si P N G a R P 1011m lenn Highway w S O NATIONAL PRESERVE la C Chisana Tazlina K Braye a Mount Jarvis R Private property lin Mount Zanetti A 13421ft interspersed with Lakes az 13009ft E T Wrangell-St. Elias 4091m I CIER public lands. 3965 m C LA Headquarters and N G Beaver A Cre Mount Wrangell L A ek Visitor Center Copper N (K’ełt’aeni) G A S Ahtna Cultural Center Center Native G I 14163ft H Corporation C 1100ft 4317m Land Wiki Peak 335m C NATIONAL E A 7655ft o p N 2333m S r p PRESERVE L Chisana e E v e i Pass r Da r B R din L N A Ptarmigan Lake a River e v i (K? atbah M?nn?) a R Solo Mountain n i R t a S E M 5875ft u R n I l i i N v l C 1791m K s O I e a A U r t L N T A Rock Lake e G Solo Lake h Atna Peaks Willow G r RO C C N 13860ft H Lake O r Mount Blackburn N L a 4225m G e L Kenny Lake l Parka Peak Regal Mountain (K'a'si Tl'aadi) n C White River rto H 16390ft Rime 13280ft 13845ft dge ig E h Peak 4048m 4220m R w Ko 4996m EG Klutina tsina River 12741ft AL a R Stairway G y L Lake E 3883m L Castle Mountain I K G C Sko 10 E Icefall lai C 8620ft Tonsina A re N A ek 2627m L N N K G I I Dixie Pass US ULAN A C Z Skolai Pass Mount Sulzer K O I Native Corporation Land M 10926ft N TT R Chitistone Liberty E c R 3330m Donoho I C C Pass E Falls C a I er Peak r iv A e r R r C e t L e a 6696ft v h n i A i k s G R y McCarthy Road Chitistone L n 2041m o a Mount Natazhat T G not maintained n Falls a l Hidden Creek T during winter. usku G 13435ft O K L Lake L Kennecott Visitor Center 4095m Strelna A O (summer only) L Chitina R E C r I e S Ranger Station Kuskulana E 2100ft iv S Private property R Kennecott R Tonsina (summer only) Bridge interspersed with 640m U Lake Gilahina River R 581ft public lands. To Trestle a ne b Mount Churchill 177m ahin sto y Gil Fireweed McCarthy iti C 15638ft r Ch r 4766m UNITED STATES Crystalline Hills e Mtn 1400ft Mount Bona iv Sourdough Peak R Long 427m U 16421ft M (unp 6201ft N t c aved) Lake Kennicott CANADA Chi ina C 1890m I V 5005m art a d River E hy Ro R Native R N Dan Creek S I 4 ver i McCarthy Road izin T Y i Corporation (Tse v Lakina a R R di er Information iver Private property R A N G E Land N interspersed with S Mount r Nelson Mountain a Station May Creek Bear GL e Spirit Mountain ') public lands. University TONSINA 5457ft 14831ft p 7287ft Peak R p 1663m 4520m 2221m E 14470ft I o y C a NATIONAL 4410m A A C hw L g G i H H a Y na C o PRESERVE n gi un so ta h g rd Cre S a R a ek ich ive M N R r k a I Tebay i c K R n CO E I Lakes a LL W I C A RIDG A R E H L i G Thompson Pass r v Klu Rive e Chit 2771ft r in D a River R 845m NA N T R a A n B Lowe River a Tasn R To un Hanagita Peak iv a e Valdez r 8504ft Goodlata Peak r Rive e T r n Ri 2592m 8166ft m ver e 2489m r I E R C B A C Native G L Corporation I N A Land C H I T H Baldy Mountain NATIONAL PARK 7230ft U 2204m E R E W G I L A C O L S H A G G L A L A A F G C G N L A R I E Cordova Peak N A R R N G C 7730ft E I L N T A 2356m G E C I M E R H L E A R A R N I L E N G L C G KLUANE A L A C I E R W B E E GL I R N ICKE AC E T IE L R R A r N G Cree e M k NATIONAL PARK A e A iv Granit R E O I e A d u Ross Green V N R R C U G VI IE H L A C ILD N L T Lake I AND RESERVE R A S Miles T A H G L GL A S O E G S RT G AC Lake I N C M P S I D G I O R O PO T ER I N T M E O I L E Mount Tom White R C S G J S L A C I E R 11210ft E F F E I E R R I E S G L A C McArthur Peak 3417m Juniper Island 14400ft 4434ft 4389m CHUGACH NATIONAL FOREST 1351m r Mount B A G King Peak M e R L E Y 16971ft H v E Steller I C Mount Cordova i I E 5173m U R C V 10617ft A Logan R A L B r IE 3236m L E 19551ft e AC L Y O L B p G G E 5959m ER W A I D G A p IV X E L L R R IN R R o MART 10 E U D C M C ar L O L ti L Mount Miller U M n B G Mud flats R E 8875ft U S iv L e T G A r 2705m L A C I N C S R E R I I E S E W A R D G E A C L A C R Mount Alverstone COPPER L I E T 14565ft Mount Kennedy G R Mount Vancouver 4439m 13093ft RIVER Y Mount Saint Elias Mount Augusta 15979ft 3991m A 4870m A DELTA G H (Was’eitushaa) 14070ft er N T 18008ft 4289m iv Mount Hubbard R I S N E 5489m EW Yukon Territory I 15015ft R T r ON 4577m e G G E v N L Haydon Peak L ) I N S O N i A R O B R A C R B I n M O C 11945ft E E CANADA g U R I i N L n h I 3641m T C e i t S I Alaska A E NATIONAL l r o B t I G R A e N U R T k B L S E B Y u S I ? Katalla O E L G PARK C t D T UNITED STATES OT GL Y Y A L A ? GU CI I L ER H G V S H Z Mount Cook G A I I LLS ( L HI D Point Glorious S R L L R D 13760ft E L A S V R S O 5000ft R R R A I AM 4194m E R A O G S A I 1524m G E K F I Native A L W N A C E Mount Seattle A Corporation T C A I A T S U E Land L 10070ft Mud R R G 3069m N flats ER SUCKLING CAPE CHAIX G D HILLS LA R YAKATAGA HILLS CI A ER BB HU YT Y A Y Mount Jette A BC CAPE SUCKLING B B Haenke I.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologic Maps of the Eastern Alaska Range, Alaska, (44 Quadrangles, 1:63360 Scale)
    Report of Investigations 2015-6 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units by Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner Southeastern Tanana Basin Southern Yukon–Tanana Upland and Terrane Delta River Granite Jarvis Mountain Aurora Peak Creek Terrane Hines Creek Fault Black Rapids Glacier Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane - Southern Yukon–Tanana Terrane Windy Terrane Denali Denali Fault Fault East Susitna Canwell Batholith Glacier Maclaren Glacier McCallum Creek- Metamorhic Belt Meteor Peak Slate Creek Thrust Broxson Gulch Fault Thrust Rainbow Mountain Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Phelan Delta Creek River Highway Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Published by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 2015 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner COVER: View toward the north across the eastern Alaska Range and into the southern Yukon–Tanana Upland highlighting geologic, structural, and geomorphic features. View is across the central Mount Hayes Quadrangle and is centered on the Delta River, Richardson Highway, and Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). Major geologic features, from south to north, are: (1) the Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane; (2) the Maclaren Terrane containing the Maclaren Glacier Metamorphic Belt to the south and the East Susitna Batholith to the north; (3) the Windy Terrane; (4) the Aurora Peak Terrane; and (5) the Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane of the Yukon–Tanana Terrane.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Sanford…Errrr, Mount Jarvis. Wait, What?? Mount Who?? It Was Roughly Around Thanksgiving 2016 and the Time Had Come Fo
    Mount Sanford…errrr, Mount Jarvis. Wait, what?? Mount Who?? It was roughly around Thanksgiving 2016 and the time had come for me to book my next IMG adventure. With two young children at home and no family close by, I had settled into a routine of doing a big climb every other year. This year was a bit different, as I normally book my major climbs around September for an April or May departure the following year. However, due to a Mt. Blackburn (Alaska) trip falling through, I had to book another expedition. In 2015, I was on an IMG team that summitted Mt. Bona from the north side, not the original plan (jot that down – this will become a theme in Alaska), and really enjoyed the solitude, adventure, physical challenge, small team, and lack of schedule the Wrangell & St Elias Mountains had to offer. So, I hopped on IMG’s website, checked out the scheduled Alaskan climb for 2017, which was Mt. Sanford, and peppered George with my typical questions. Everything lined up, so I completed the pile of paperwork (do I really have to sign another waiver?!?), sent in my deposit (still no AMEX, ugh…), set my training schedule, and started Googling trip reports about Mt. Sanford. Little did I know that READING about Mt. Sanford was the closest I would ever get to it! Pulling from my previous Alaskan climbing experience, I was better prepared for this trip than for Mt Bona in 2015. Due to our bush pilot’s inability to safely land us on the south side of Bona two years prior, we flew up, around, and over the mountain and landed on the north side.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Notes
    268 NORTH AMERICAN NOTES NORTH AMERICAN NOTES BY KENNETH A. HENDERSON HE year I 967 marked the Centennial celebration of the purchase of Alaska from Russia by the United States and the Centenary of the Articles of Confederation which formed the Canadian provinces into the Dominion of Canada. Thus both Alaska and Canada were in a mood to celebrate, and a part of this celebration was expressed · in an extremely active climbing season both in Alaska and the Yukon, where some of the highest mountains on the continent are located. While much of the officially sponsored mountaineering activity was concentrated in the border mountains between Alaska and the Yukon, there was intense activity all over Alaska as well. More information is now available on the first winter ascent of Mount McKinley mentioned in A.J. 72. 329. The team of eight was inter­ national in scope, a Frenchman, Swiss, German, Japanese, and New Zealander, the rest Americans. The successful group of three reached the summit on February 28 in typical Alaskan weather, -62° F. and winds of 35-40 knots. On their return they were stormbound at Denali Pass camp, I7,3oo ft. for seven days. For the forty days they were on the mountain temperatures averaged -35° to -40° F. (A.A.J. I6. 2I.) One of the most important attacks on McKinley in the summer of I967 was probably the three-pronged assault on the South face by the three parties under the general direction of Boyd Everett (A.A.J. I6. IO). The fourteen men flew in to the South east fork of the Kahiltna glacier on June 22 and split into three groups for the climbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Resedimentation of the Late Holocene White River Tephra, Yukon Territory and Alaska
    Resedimentation of the late Holocene White River tephra, Yukon Territory and Alaska K.D. West1 and J.A. Donaldson2 Carleton University3 West, K.D. and Donaldson, J.A. 2002. Resedimentation of the late Holocene White River tephra, Yukon Territory and Alaska. In: Yukon Exploration and Geology 2002, D.S. Emond, L.H. Weston and L.L. Lewis (eds.), Exploration and Geological Services Division, Yukon Region, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, p. 239-247. ABSTRACT The Wrangell region of eastern Alaska represents a zone of extensive volcanism marked by intermittent pyroclastic activity during the late Holocene. The most recent and widely dispersed pyroclastic deposit in this area is the White River tephra, a distinct tephra-fall deposit covering 540 000 km2 in Alaska, Yukon, and the Northwest Territories. This deposit is the product of two Plinian eruptions from Mount Churchill, preserved in two distinct lobes, created ca. 1887 years B.P. (northern lobe) and 1147 years B.P. (eastern lobe). The tephra consists of distal primary air-fall deposits and proximal, locally resedimented volcaniclastic deposits. Distinctive layers such as the White River tephra provide important chronostratigraphic control and can be used to interpret the cultural and environmental impact of ancient large magnitude eruptions. The resedimentation of White River tephra has resulted in large-scale terraces, which fl ank the margins of Klutlan Glacier. Preliminary analysis of resedimented deposits demonstrates that the volcanic stratigraphy within individual terraces is complex and unique. RÉSUMÉ Au cours de l’Holocène tardif, des matériaux pyroclastiques ont été projetés lors d’importantes et nombreuses éruptions volcaniques, dans la région de Wrangell de l’est de l’Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Volcanic Activity in Alaska and Kamchatka: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory by Christina A
    2002 Volcanic Activity in Alaska and Kamchatka: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory by Christina A. Neal, Robert G. McGimsey, and Olga Girina Open-File Report 2004-1058 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 2002 Volcanic Activity in Alaska and Kamchatka: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory By Christina A. Neal1, Robert G. McGimsey1, and Olga Girina2 1Alaska Volcano Observatory, 4200 University Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508-4664 2Kamchatka Volcanic Eruptions Response Team, Institute of Volcanic Geology and Geochemistry, Piip Blvd, 9 Petropavlovsk- Kamchatsky, 683006, Russia AVO is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys. AVO is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program and the State of Alaska Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Open-File Report 2004-1058 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................................1 Volcanic.Activity.in.Alaska..........................................................................................................4 Wrangell.Volcano.........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Sizing-Up Mountains
    Defining and Sizing-up Mountains By Steven Fry What are the ten highest mountains in the world? ridge-level, before it is considered an individual Is Mount Everest larger than Mount McKinley? Does mountain. Mount Rainier rise higher above its base than In 1981, following 12 years of academic, profes- Everest? Unbelievably, these questions have never sional and recreational mountain study, I decided to been answered with any certainty, for the simple rea- make a serious attempt to establish a workable defi- son that mountains have remained essentially nition for mountains. I studied thousands of moun- undefined. tains and hills before I arrived at the conclusion There are some who may say defining mountains presented in this article. My research mainly focused is irnposstbte. However, the word "impossible" on Washington's Cascade Range, but I also studied should be used with great caution, especially within other sections of the Cascade Range, the Rockies, the climbing community. Furthermore, classifica- Sierra Nevada, Appalachians, Himalayas, Andes, tion systems are ubiquitous for such things as trees, Alps, British Isles, Alaska Range and numerous animals, rocks and clouds-and although not other geographic localities. perfect - these systems do help people better de- Mountain Definitions scribe and eventually understand the world around A mountain can be defined based upon the follow- us. ing three geographic parameters: A. Local Relief; B. Various geographers and geologists have stated Elevation; and C. Prominence. These three that a mountain must have: 1. 1,000 or 2,000 feet parameters are utilized in the mountain definitions of local relief; 2. Relatively steep slopes; and 3.
    [Show full text]
  • North America Summary, 1968
    240 CLIMBS A~D REGIONAL ?\OTES North America Summary, 1968. Climbing activity in both Alaska and Canada subsided mar­ kedly from the peak in 1967 when both regions were celebrating their centen­ nials. The lessened activity seems also to have spread to other sections too for new routes and first ascents were considerably fewer. In Alaska probably the outstanding climb from the standpoint of difficulty was the fourth ascent of Mount Foraker, where a four-man party (Warren Bleser, Alex Birtulis, Hans Baer, Peter Williams) opened a new route up the central rib of the South face. Late in June this party flew in from Talkeetna to the Lacuna glacier. By 11 July they had established their Base Camp at the foot of the South face and started up the rib. This involved 10,000 ft of ice and rotten rock at an angle of 65°. In the next two weeks three camps were estab­ lished, the highest at 13,000 ft. Here, it was decided to make an all-out push for the summit. On 24 July two of the climbers started ahead to prepare a route. In twenty-eight hours of steady going they finally reached a suitable spot for a bivouac. The other two men who started long after them reached the same place in ten hours of steady going utilising the steps, fixed ropes and pitons left by the first party. After a night in the bivouac, the two groups then contin­ ued together and reached the summit, 17,300 ft, on 25 July. They were forced to bivouac another night on the return before reaching their high camp.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrangell-St. Elias Alaska
    Wrangell - St. Elias National Park Service National Park and National Preserve U.S. Department of the Interior Wrangell-St. Elias Alaska The wildness of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation vest harbor seals, which feed on fish and In late summer, black and brown bears, drawn and Preserve is uncompromising, its geography Act (ANILCA) of 1980 allows the subsistence marine invertebrates. These species and many by ripening soapberries, frequent the forests awe-inspiring. Mount Wrangell, namesake of harvest of wildlife within the park, and preserve more are key foods in the subsistence diet of and gravel bars. Human history here is ancient one of the park's four mountain ranges, is an and sport hunting only in the preserve. Hunters the Ahtna and Upper Tanana Athabaskans, and relatively sparse, and has left a light imprint active volcano. Hundreds of glaciers and ice find Dall's sheep, the park's most numerous Eyak, and Tlingit peoples. Local, non-Native on the immense landscape. Even where people fields form in the high peaks, then melt into riv­ large mammal, on mountain slopes where they people also share in the bounty. continue to hunt, fish, and trap, most animal, ers and streams that drain to the Gulf of Alaska browse sedges, grasses, and forbs. Sockeye, Chi­ fish, and plant populations are healthy and self­ and the Bering Sea. Ice is a bridge that connects nook, and Coho salmon spawn in area lakes and Long, dark winters and brief, lush summers lend regulati ng. For the species who call Wrangell­ the park's geographically isolated areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glenn Highway EMBODIES ALL SIX QUALITIES of a SCENIC BYWAY
    The Glenn Highway EMBODIES ALL SIX QUALITIES OF A SCENIC BYWAY. Scenic Historic Cultural Natural Recreational Archaeological This resource This resource Evidence and Those features of Outdoor Those offers a heightened encompasses expressions of the the visual recreational characteristics of visual experience legacies of the past customs or environment that activities are the scenic byways derived from the that are distinctly traditions of a are in a relatively directly associated corridor that are view of natural associated with distinct group of undisturbed state. with and physical evidence and man made physical elements people. Cultural These features dependent upon of historic or elements of the of the landscape, features include, predate the arrival the natural and prehistoric human visual environment whether natural or but are not limited of human cultural elements life or activity that of the scenic man made, that to crafts, music, populations and of the corridor’s are visible and byway corridor. are of such dance, rituals, may include landscape. capable of being The characteristics significance that festivals, speech, geological The recreational inventoried and of the landscape they educate the food, special formations, fossils, activities provide interpreted. The are strikingly viewer and stir an events, vernacular landform, water opportunities for scenic byway distinct and offer a appreciation of the architecture, etc. bodies, vegetation, active and passive corridor’s pleasing and most past. The historic and are currently and wildlife. There recreational archaeological memorable visual elements reflect practiced. The may be evidence of experiences. They interest, as experience. All the actions of cultural qualities of human activity but include, but are not identified through elements of the people and may the corridor could the natural features limited to downhill ruins, artifacts, landscape – include buildings, highlight one or reveal minimal skiing, rafting, structural remains landform, water, settlement more significant disturbances.
    [Show full text]
  • GULF of ALASKA N NUN K JO a Permission Before Entering Roads And/Or Trails So You H a a NUNATAKR GLACIER K Malaspina H D the One Million Acres of Do Not Trespass
    N District Ranger Station ab Slana 4 iver es Noyes Mtn M T E T L I N L O W L A N D S Fish Lake To Delta Junction R na E jek 8147 ft N 2 on and Fairbanks y Roa TA D a Chistochina d S TETLIN NATIONAL hw er NATIONAL TA ig pp G H Co u r PRESERVE lk e n M WILDLIFE REFUGE 1 n a v Jack i e 1 r O n l r U a R G e DAWSON e Lake N Ewan ff v i v a i T R to A R n R Lake i u I v N o C a Tanada R e sn S k k e i Crosswind r b Wellesley v a o Lake Copper a T Capital Mountain e N r Lake G r Mountain r 7731 ft e Lake e Beaver Creek N v p 4960 ft Wellesley Nabesna U i p R Lake o Caution. Private T R k iv C Z RANGE Gulkana Gakona rd er e property interspersed O a fo re n San Tanada Peak C with public lands. T a I is 9358 ft a N h Drive Mt Sanford sin C k Y 16237 ft Jac Cooper Pass Mt Allen 9480 ft U R K E M I B O O Nabesna Rd C U au r N l A e Tolsona Lake Glennallen A N to N v I i L f i S 1 T L s R Mt Drum f R i G a a v A T L A C lin r e NATIONAL PRESERVE I I z ve w r r To a Ri 12010 ft N E N T a e l Mt Gordon S R S G K R t Anchorage E K 9040 ft i R E Mt Zanetti P G A h R A N P Chisana Braye I 13009 ft T Mt Jarvis O CIER W A Lakes O Tazlina C 13421 ft L Caution.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Wrangell District, Alaska
    A, Economic Qeol y, 25 Rofeasional Paper No. 15 Series{ B, Dwmiptins Q&, 80 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNlTED S'l'hTES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES U. \flALCOTT, I)IRECTOR THE MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE MOUNT WRANGELL DISTRICT, ALASKA BY WALTER C, MENDENHALL AND FRANK C, SCHRADER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1903 .I MOUNT WRANGELL. VIFW t-keri frnm thi, Giivr,~nment im1 above To~is~iaBr~iloe 41 mles from tire sumtnit of tits maunin,~ I; NkDlNA RIVER BARS, Mnunt Drum in backgniuncl. Page . Introduction ................................................................................ 9 Copper ................................................................................... 13 Southern area ......................................................................... 13 Location ................................................................ ., ....... 13 Routes and trails ................................................................. 13 Geologic sketch .................................................................. 14 Nikolai greenstone ............................................................. 14 Chitistone limestone .......................................................... 14 Triassic shales and limestones ............................ .. .......... 15 Kennicott formation .......................................................... 15 Intrusive rocks ............................................................... 15 Copper occurrences ............................................................... 16 General statement ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: an Ethnographic Overview and Assessment
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2015 Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Thomas Thornton University of Oxford Rachel Lahoff Portland State University Jamie Hebert Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas; Thornton, Thomas; Lahoff, Rachel; and Hebert, Jamie, "Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment" (2015). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 99. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/99 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment Douglas Deur, Ph.D. Thomas Thornton, Ph.D. Rachel Lahoff, M.A. Jamie Hebert, M.A. 2015 Cover photos: Mount St. Elias / Was'ei Tashaa (courtesy Wikimedia Commons); Mount St. Elias Dancers (courtesy Yakutat Tlingit Tribe / Bert Adams Sr.) Yakutat Tlingit and Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve: An Ethnographic Overview and Assessment 2015 Douglas Deur, Thomas Thornton, Rachel Lahoff, and Jamie Hebert Portland State University Department of Anthropology United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Wrangell-St.
    [Show full text]