JB Nash Lecture Series

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JB Nash Lecture Series DOCUMENT RESUME ED 324 312 SP 032 676 AUTHOR Gray, Howard R., Comp.; And Others TITLE J.B. Nash Lecture Series. INSTITUTION American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, Reston, V. American Association for Leisure and Recreation. PUB DATE Oct 90 NCTE 236p. PUB TYPE Collected Works - General (020) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Futures (of Society); Individual Development; *Leisure Time; *Life Satisfaction; *Life Style; Mental Health; *Quality of Life; *Recreation; Well Being ABSTRACT The following lectures are presented in this publication: (1) "The Dynamics of Recreation" (Betty Van der Smissen);(2) "Recreation Prospects" (Edith L. Ball); (3) "A View of the Past--A Bridge to the Future" (Allen V. Sapora);(4) "Coming to Grips with the New Leisure" (Richard G. Kraus); (5) "The Mild Blue Yonder--Changing Lifestyles and Leisure" (Janet R. MacLean); (6) "Visions" (H. Douglas Sessoms); (7) "The Great Simplicities" (David E. Gray);(8) "Leisure and Recreation: Time To Reconceptualize!" (Tony Mobley);(9) "Creating Interfaces and Synergies" (Diana R. Dunn); (10) "Dreaming of the Future" (Joseph J. Bannon); (11) "Leisure Trilogy I: The Future" (Max Kaplan); (12) "A Leisure Society: Idle Dream or Viable Alternative, Encroaching Menace or Golden Opportunity" (John Neulinger); and (13) "Moral Leisure: The Promise and Wonder" (Gerald S. Fain). Part two of the monograph includes biographical information on James Bryan Nash and some quotations from )lis works. (JD) ***************************w******************************************* * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** J.B. NASH LECTURE SERIES Compiled by: Howard R. Gray Larry. L. Neal S. Harold Smith U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office ot Educatonal Research and Immvernent EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIO4 CENTER 1ERIC) I' This doCument haS been ,ewoduced as teCemad from the Pawn or otgana atm', or9nattng d C &fists, changes have been made to rrnbrorre reProduCtron Qoality Pornts or veu, or ecuetons Stated inthIS doCu men? do not neCesSariry represent officai OERI pos,tronCO DOlicy October, 1990 AmericanAssociation for Leisure and Recreation An Association of: AmericanAlliance of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 2 ....WIL i Purposes of the American Alliance For Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance The A merican Alliance is an educational organization, structuredfor the purposes of supporting, encouraging, and providingassistance to member groups and their personnel throughoutthe nation as they seek to initiate, develop, and conductprograms in health, leisure, and movement- related activities for the enrichment of humanlife. Alliance objectives include: 1. Professional growth and development--tosupport, encourage, and provide guidance in the development and conductof programs in health, leisure, and movement-related activitieswhich are based on the needs, interests, and inherent capacities of theindividual in today's society. 2. Communication--to facilitate public andprofessional understanding and appreciation of the importance and value ofhealth, leisure, and movement-related activitiesas they contribute toward human well- being. 3. Research--to encourage and facilitateresearch which will enrich the depth and scope of health, leisure, andmovement-related activities; and to disseminate the findings to the profession andother interested and concerned publics. 4. Standards and guidelines--to furtherthe continuous development and evaluation of standards within the professionfor personnel and programs inhealth,leisure, and movement-related activities. 5. Public affairs--to coordinate andadminister a planned program of professional, public, and governmentalrelations that will improve education in areas of health, leisure, andmovement-reiated activities. 6. To conduct such other activitiesas shall be approved by the Board of Governors and the Alliance Assembly, providedthat the Alliance shall not engage in any activity which would beinconsistent with the status of an educational and charitable organizationas defined in Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Codeof 1954 or any successor provision thereto, and none of the saidpurposes shall at any time be deemed or construed to be purposes other than thepublic benefit purposes and objectives consistent with such educationaland charitable status. Bylaws, Article Ill ii Contents PART I:Lectures 1. THE DYNAMES OF RECREATION 1 1 Betty Van der Smissen 2. RECREATION FROSPECIS 18 Edith L. Ball 3. A VIEW OF THE PAST--A BRIDGE TO THE FUIURE 31 Allen V. Sapora 4. COMING TO GRIPS WITH THE NEW LEISURE 46 Richard G. Kraus 5. THE MILD BLUE YONDER--CHANGING UFESTYLES AND IZISURE 55 Janet R. MacLean 6. VISIONS 70 H. Douglas Sessoms 7. 11-1E GREAT SIMPUCIIIES 84 David E. Gray 8. LEISURE AND RECREATION: TIME TO RECONCENUAIIZEI 94 Tony Mobley 9. CREATING INTERFACES AND SYNERGLES 107 Diana R. Dunn 10. DREAMING OF THE FUIURE 124 Joseph J. Bannon 11. LEISURE TRILOGY I: 11-1E FIJIURE 143 Max Kaplan 4 iii 12. A LEISURE SOCIETY: mix DREAM OR VIABLE ALTERNATIVE, ENCROACHIP-G MENACE OR GOIDEN OPPORIUNIN 16 1 John Neu linger 13. MORAL LEISURE: THE PROMISE AND WON1DER 174 Gerald S. Fain PART II:Bibliography and Quotes 1. SELECT BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION: JAMES BRIAN NASH 197 Harvey M. Jessup 2. NASH'S PHILOSOPHY, ADVICE AND WITICISMS...218 PART I: Lectures 1 THE DYNAMICS OF RECREATION J. B. Nash ScholP., Lecture Kansas City, Kansas April 7, 1978 BETTY VAN DER SMISSEN Education: University of Kansas A.B., J.D. 1952 Indiana University M.S., Re.D. 1952 7 2 THE DYNAMICS OF RECREATION Betty Van der Smissen Itis of particular significance that the scholar/lecturer award honors J. B.Nash, because he certainly was a leader in the recreation field,a leader who philosophically set the direction formany.And, itis partly because of his philosophical coittribution that the title for this firstlecture was selectedThe Dynamics of Recreation.Today and looking ahead to the decade of the 80s, itis critical to again think deeply aboutour philosophy. Emphasizing the criticalness has recently been several peoplementioning that perhaps we have forgottenour philosophy in our educational institutions and with the studentsare focusing on recreation as primarily a job.Too often today our students andyoung professionals are saying: "I am confused about recreation as a profession.Where isit going? What does it mean? What does it stand for? What is recreation, anyway?"While jobs are important, one must also havea philosophical base, a premise of beliefand the old stereotypes do not fit.This presentation will not answer all the questions, but perhaps it can stimulate us to think again about the dynamics of recreation for today's society. ConceptualFramework What is recreation? Recreation is not activityitis the result of activity.It is a sensation of well-being, of feeling goodabout oneself and about others. When we feel good about ourselves and others,we also feel good about the world.We talk about recreation being voluntary, that inorder for a pursuit to be recreation we must voluntarilyengage in it.This is inaccurate.There are many constraints and motivations relatedto participation.But, given totally free choice, selected will be onlythose pursuits which make you feel good, not in the superficialtemporary "drug- high" sense, but in the deep experience ofa sense of personal well-being. An activity is recreational when it givesa sense of well-being; it is recreation (re-creation) when one experiencesa sense of well-being. Recreation is innately good; and, the questionto be asked is not "What is recreation good for and whyare we doing it?" but rather "What is the good *J. B. Nash Lecture, Kansas City, Kansas, April7th, 1978, AAHPERD/AALR convention. 3 in recreation?" To ask the question "What is recreation good for?," weplace a utilitarian purpose or value onrecreation.We place the onus on participants for having to justify their participation and to do so degrades participation.How many times have you heard the "guilt" of participationwhether it be from an elderly person with the Puritan ethic " of work, or yourself saying to another, "I shouldn't take time, but. .. You (or others) feel there must be an explanation or reason for permitting yourself to engage in recreational activity.And, how many times in surveys do we ask, "Why do you participate?" and get the response"Just because, it'3 fun, I enjoy it?"--andwe are not with such responses! Why not? We want a utilitarian reason for participation.The participants are getting a sense of well-being.Why must they introspectively analyze their participation? There is good in recreation why do we have to force people to justify their participation by stating what recreation is good for? However, do not confuse justification and reason for participation with motivation to participate or with the use of activity to achieve certain results.There are utilitarian uses for activity and professionals must understand scientifically (not only emotionally) the function and nature of activity in order to program both to achieve utilitarian objectives and to enhance the likelihood of individuals to attain a sense of well-being. Recreatior. must be viewed in a framework of individual meaning, rather than traditional time units! activity types, and age groups.A common working definition of recreation is derived from the discretionary time concept of leisure, which
Recommended publications
  • Mihály Csíkszentmihályi 19 Wikipedia Articles
    Mihály Csíkszentmihályi 19 Wikipedia Articles PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:52:33 UTC Contents Articles Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi 1 Flow (psychology) 4 Overlearning 16 Relaxation (psychology) 17 Boredom 18 Apathy 22 Worry 25 Anxiety 27 Arousal 33 Mindfulness (psychology) 34 Meditation 44 Yoga 66 Alexander technique 82 Martial arts 87 John Neulinger 97 Experience sampling method 100 Cognitive science 101 Attention 112 Creativity 117 References Article Sources and Contributors 139 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 144 Article Licenses License 146 Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi 1 Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi ( /ˈmiːhaɪˌtʃiːksɛntməˈhaɪ.iː/ mee-hy cheek-sent-mə-hy-ee; Hungarian: Csíkszentmihályi Mihály Hungarian pronunciation: [ˈtʃiːksɛntmihaːji ˈmihaːj]; born September 29, 1934, in Fiume, Italy – now Rijeka, Croatia) is a Hungarian psychology professor, who emigrated to the United States at the age of 22. Now at Claremont Graduate University, he is the former head of the department of psychology at the University of Chicago and of the department of sociology and anthropology at Lake Forest College. He is noted for both his work in the study of happiness and creativity and also for his notoriously difficult name, in terms of pronunciation for non-native speakers of the Hungarian language, but is best known as the architect of the notion of flow and for his years of research and writing on the topic. He is the author of many books and over 120 articles or book chapters. Martin Seligman, former president of the American Psychological Association, described Csikszentmihalyi as the world's leading researcher on positive psychology.[1] Csikszentmihalyi once said "Repression is not the way to virtue.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasing Leisure: a Hermeneutic of Late Modernity
    CHASING LEISURE: A HERMENEUTIC OF LATE MODERNITY by Stephen Robert Svenson A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Stephen R. Svenson 2015 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. Stephen R. Svenson ii Abstract This dissertation addresses shortcomings in the sociological study of leisure through providing a new conceptual approach for understanding human action and meaning making. It reformulates leisure as the leisure imaginary, the sphere in which the individualized person works out problems of identity and community. The leisure imaginary takes the Heidegerrian starting point that our being is a being before death and that it is our fundamental preoccupation with death that gives life its sense of urgency. In late modernity, however, our coping mechanisms for dealing with our fear and anxiety over death have been compromised which has left people disembedded and individualized. It is the thesis of this dissertation that leisure imaginaries have arisen to fill the gap left by institutions like religion and the family that formerly provided ontological security and ontological exigence. The leisure imaginary, then, is a response not only to our being before death but to the conditions of late modernity, the anxieties and preoccupations of our time, our social imaginary or lifeworld.
    [Show full text]
  • THE KEY REPORTER Second Class Postage Paid PHI BETA KAPPA at Washington
    reporter volume xxvi number three spring 1970 PHI BETA KAPPA APPOINTS TEN by Kathy Ryffel, Asst., VISITING SCHOLARS FOR 1970-71 Visiting Scholar Program When ecologist Garrett Hardin meets with students and 86 schools to introduce students and faculties to a wide va faculty this coming fall, his arrival will not only inaugurate riety of subjects, ranging from the jazz of Charlie Parker to the 1970-71 apBK Visiting Scholar Program, it will also mark the ancestors of modern cultivated corn, from the importance the 1000th visit sponsored by the fourteen-year old program. of Eastern Europe to the annihilation of history. Scholars Since 1956, 95 Scholars have crisscrossed the country in and chapters continue to confirm the significance of a pro order to spend two or three days with undergraduates at gram whose aim is to enable undergraduates to meet with universities and colleges that shelter <J>BK chapters. established scholars in diverse disciplines. A remark by one of expresses view of most: greatest It was in October of that year that Mr. Daryll Forde flew the Scholars the "My pleasure as a Phi Kappa talk to Milwaukee-Downer College (now joined with Lawrence Beta Visiting Scholar has been to to know them listen University) to make the first visit given under the auspices ing young people, getting personally, to their ideas and and of Phi Beta Kappa. A British subject, Mr. Forde was then a ing plans, giving them unhurried sought." visiting professor at the University of California at Berkeley advice or information when it is The following com as well as professor of anthropology at the University of Lon ment from one chapter correspondent points out the benefit don, a position he still holds today.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Ross Shawna Dissertation.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School SPACES OF PLAY: INVENTING THE MODERN LEISURE SPACE IN BRITISH FICTION AND CULTURE, 1860-1960 A Dissertation in English by Shawna Ross © 2011 Shawna Ross Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2011 The dissertation of Shawna Ross was reviewed and approved∗ by the following: Janet Lyon Associate Professor of English, Women's Studies, & Science, Technology, and Society Dissertation Advisor, Chair of Committee Jeffrey Nealon Liberal Arts Research Professor of English Mark Morrisson Interim Head Professor of English and Science, Technology, and Society Jonathan Eburne Assistant Professor of Comparative Literature and English ∗Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii Abstract This dissertation seeks to establish the very real and important relationship between British modernist literature and the emergence of the modern leisure space after 1867. At the core of this dissertation is that claim that as leisure spaces spatially, socially, and economically modernized —as the inn became the hotel, the coast became the seaside resort, the natural spring became the spa, and the sailing ship became the luxury liner—they territorialized (both literally and figuratively) the concept of leisure in a way that is both historically unique and significant for the study of literary modernism. In studying this relationship, this dissertation draws from leisure studies, an umbrella term for the study of leisure with roots in late nineteenth-century industrial geography. Literary criticism has largely abstained from these interdisciplinary conversations about leisure, and one of the goals of this dissertation is to disrupt this unproductive silence.
    [Show full text]