DOCSLIB.ORG

LIT 174 Nikolai Gogol's Dead Souls Instructor: Anne Hruska Winter 2012, January 11Th Through February 8Th Wednesdays, 7:00 to 8:50 Pm 5 Weeks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LIT 174 Nikolai Gogol's Dead Souls Instructor: Anne Hruska Winter 2012, January 11Th Through February 8Th Wednesdays, 7:00 to 8:50 Pm 5 Weeks LIT 174 Nikolai Gogol's Dead Souls Instructor: Anne Hruska Winter 2012, January 11th through February 8th Wednesdays, 7:00 to 8:50 pm 5 weeks I. Course description First published in 1842, Dead Souls was a smash success among Russian readers, who loved it for its biting humor and its grotesque accuracy about the sordid side of Russian life. But what is Dead Souls, and how should we go about reading it? Is it a hard-hitting exposé of the evils of serfdom? A merciless (and hilarious) satire of Russian society? A veiled exploration of religious ideas? Or is Dead Souls primarily concerned with play: play with words, with images, and with narrative form? While Dead Souls can be read in all of those ways, it is also a work of great complexity that continually wriggles away from attempts to define it or pin it down. In this class we will read Dead Souls from a number of different angles. We will explore its role in Gogol’s biography and in Russian cultural history, as well as some of the highly varied ways in which it has been interpreted. The goal will be not only to supply students with a scholarly framework for understanding Dead Souls, but also to allow each student to come to his own independent interpretation of this complex and controversial work. Each class period will consist of two parts, each lasting about 50 minutes. The first part will be lecture, while the second will be class discussion. I'll often start the second part with a discussion of a specific passage from the text that I'll have asked you to focus on in your reading for that week. Required text: Dead Souls, trans. Robert A. Maguire Recommended text: The Collected Tales of Nikolai Gogol, trans Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. II. Grades Attendance and participation are required in order to get credit (on the CR/NC basis) for the class. That means you need to come to each class on time, and say at least one productive thing in class discussion in order to get credit for the course. If you miss more than one class, you'll be required to write a paper in order to get a CR grade for the course. (Or, if you just feel like writing a paper but don't want a grade on it, you can write a paper and I will comment on it, but will not give it a grade.) If you are taking the class for a grade, then you'll be required to write an analytic paper of about 3-4 pages. Outside research won't be necessary for this paper. I recommend that you focus your paper on a short passage from the novel (anywhere from 2 paragraphs to several pages), giving an in-depth analysis of the details of that passage and making an argument for the significance of the passage in relationship to the novel as a whole. Papers will be evaluated based on their use of detail, the strength of the ideas they contain, and the degree to which these ideas are supported by the text. The due date for this paper will be February 15. While I don't hold formal office hours, I'll be happy to talk with you about your papers on the phone or over email. I'm also available during the break and after class. III. Communication It helps me to know what's on your mind. If you have a question that you want addressed in class, ask it, either in class or by email. If you want suggestions for further reading, let me know - I can send you suggestions tailored specifically to your interests. If you want to brainstorm ideas for your paper, I'm happy to help. If you have a frustration, I want to hear about it. IV. Reading and Lecture Schedule Week 1: 1/11 Read up to p. 65 (end of Part I, chapter 3) Lecture topic: Gogol's biography and the writing of Dead Souls. Week 2: 1/18 Read up to p. 121 (end of Part I, chapter 5). Read "Old World Landowners" from The Collected Tales of Nikolai Gogol Lecture topic: Serfdom, society and the culture of silence. Dead Souls in historical context. Week 3: 1/25 Read up to p. 200 (end of Part I, chapter 8). Read "The Nose" from The Collected Tales of Nikolai Gogol. Lecture topic: Language and play. Translations. Week 4: 2/1 Read up to p. 283 (end of Part I, chapter 11). Read parts of "Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends." Lecture topic: Looking for God in Dead Souls. Week 5: 2/8 Read Part II, finish the novel. Lecture topic: How do you solve a problem like Dead Souls? Literature, meaning, and the meaning of literature. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Susanne Fusso 219 Margarite Road Russian, East
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE Susanne Fusso 219 Margarite Road Russian, East European, and Middletown, CT 06457 Eurasian Studies Program 860-344-1683 Wesleyan University Middletown, CT 06459 860-685-3123; [email protected] Education 1976-84: Ph.D. (Distinguished) Yale University Slavic Languages and Literatures Minor: Czech Literature 1977: M.A. Yale University 1973-76: B.A. summa cum laude, Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin Major: Slavic Employment 2019-: Marcus L. Taft Professor of Modern Languages, Wesleyan University 1998-: Professor of Russian, Wesleyan University (Chair, 1999-2002; Acting Chair spring 2006; Chair, 2008-12; Acting Chair, spring 2014; Chair 2016-Present) 2001 (spring): Visiting Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures, Yale University 1992-98: Associate Professor of Russian, Wesleyan University (Chair, 1992-95) 1986-92: Assistant Professor of Russian, Wesleyan University 1985-86: Visiting Assistant Professor of Russian, Wesleyan University Honors, Grants, Distinctions 2017: 2017 AATSEEL (American Association for Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages) Award for Excellence in Post-Secondary Teaching 2017: Allbritton University Lectures grant for organizing a symposium on Nabokov in honor of Priscilla Meyer, April 2018 2017: Translation of Trepanation of the Skull named a finalist for AATSEEL Literary Translation Prize 2015: Allbritton Center University Lectures grant to bring writer Sergey Gandlevsky to Wesleyan 2008: Faculty Fellow, Center for the Humanities, Wesleyan University (spring) 2005: Mellon Workshop
    [Show full text]
  • The Government Inspector by Nikolai Gogol
    The Government Inspector (or The Inspector General) By Nikolai Gogol (c.1836) Translated here by Arthur A Sykes 1892. Arthur Sykes died in 1939. All Gogol’s staging instructions have been left in this edition. The names and naming tradition (use of first and family names) have been left as in the original Russian, as have some of the colloquiums and an expected understanding of the intricacies of Russian society and instruments of Government. There are footnotes at the end of each Act. Modern translations tend to use the job titles of the officials, and have updated references to the civil service, dropping all Russian words and replacing them with English equivalents. This script has been provided to demonstrate the play’s structure and flesh out the characters. This is not the final script that will be used in Oxford Theatre Guild’s production in October 2012. Cast of Characters ANTON ANTONOVICH, The Governor or Mayor ANNA ANDREYEVNA, his wife. MARYA ANTONOVNA, his daughter. LUKA LUKICH Khlopov, Director of Schools. Madame Khlopov His wife. AMMOS FYODOROVICH Lyapkin Tyapkin, a Judge. ARTEMI PHILIPPOVICH Zemlyanika, Charity Commissioner and Warden of the Hospital. IVANA KUZMICH Shpyokin, a Postmaster. IVAN ALEXANDROVICH KHLESTAKOV, a Government civil servant OSIP, his servant. Pyotr Ivanovich DOBCHINSKI and Pyotr Ivanovich BOBCHINSKI, [.independent gentleman] Dr Christian Ivanovich HUBNER, a District Doctor. Karobkin - another official Madame Karobkin, his wife UKHAVYORTOV, a Police Superintendent. Police Constable PUGOVKIN ABDULIN, a shopkeeper Another shopkeeper. The Locksmith's Wife. The Sergeant's Wife. MISHKA, servant of the Governor. Waiter at the inn. Act 1 – A room in the Mayor’s house Scene 1 GOVERNOR.
    [Show full text]
  • The Government Inspector Adapted by Jeffrey Hatcher from the Original by Nikolai Gogol Directed by Allison Narver
    The Government Inspector Adapted by Jeffrey Hatcher from the original by Nikolai Gogol Directed by Allison Narver All original material copyright © Seattle Shakespeare Company 2017 WELCOME Dear Educators, Welcome to our production of The Government Inspector! When I first read this script, I found myself laughing out loud every couple of pages. It’s a hilarious read of a farcical play, and I was really excited to watch it. Director Allison Narver mentioned that all of the characters are horrible people, and the protagonist of this show is comedy. Normally, I don’t love watching shows full of horrible people, but this one is so darn funny that I can spend the whole show rooting for the main character — comedy! After thinking about the play for a few weeks, and keeping up with the news cycle, I’ve been thinking more about themes in The Government Inspector. This production will simultaneously be quite relevant to our contemporary era of government corruption, and will be an escape to a world where that corruption is lampooned and all the officials get taken advantage of. This play can spark political discussions, but it can also just leave you laughing at the absurdity of it. It’s all in there. We hope you enjoy the show! Best, Michelle Burce Education Director seattleshakespeare.org/education 206-733-8228 ext. 251 or [email protected] PRODUCTION SPONSORS CONTENTS Plot Synopsis . 1 Character List . 1 Nikolai Gogol . 2 A brief look at the life of Russia’s celebrated playwright and novelist. Placing the Production . 3–4 Take a look inside the director’s inspiration and thoughts for the production Tidbits and Trivia .
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Souls Gogol, Nikolai (Translator: D
    Dead Souls Gogol, Nikolai (Translator: D. J. Hogarth) Published: 1842 Categorie(s): Fiction, Literary Source: Project Gutenberg 1 About Gogol: Nikolai Vasilievich Gogol (April 1, 1809 — March 4, 1852) was a Russian-language writer of Ukrainian origin. Although his early works were heavily influenced by his Ukrainian herit- age and upbringing, he wrote in Russian and his works belong to the tradition of Russian literature. The novel Dead Souls (1842), the play Revizor (1836, 1842), and the short story The Overcoat (1842) count among his masterpieces. Source: Wikipedia Also available on Feedbooks for Gogol: • Diary Of A Madman (1835) • The Nose (1836) • A May Evening (1887) • The Cloak (1835) • Taras Bulba (1835) • The Mysterious Portrait (1842) • How the two Ivans quarrelled (1835) • The Calash (1836) • St. John's Eve (1831) Note: This book is brought to you by Feedbooks http://www.feedbooks.com Strictly for personal use, do not use this file for commercial purposes. 2 Part 1 3 Chapter 1 To the door of an inn in the provincial town of N. there drew up a smart britchka—a light spring-carriage of the sort affected by bachelors, retired lieutenant-colonels, staff-captains, land-own- ers possessed of about a hundred souls, and, in short, all per- sons who rank as gentlemen of the intermediate category. In the britchka was seated such a gentleman—a man who, though not handsome, was not ill-favoured, not over-fat, and not over- thin. Also, though not over-elderly, he was not over-young. His arrival produced no stir in the town, and was accompanied by no particular incident, beyond that a couple of peasants who happened to be standing at the door of a dramshop exchanged a few comments with reference to the equipage rather than to the individual who was seated in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Magical Realism in the Tales of Nikolai Gogol
    Magical Realism in the Tales of Nikolai Gogol James D. Hardy, Jr. Leonard Stanton Louisiana State University There is a story about St. Serafim of Sarov (1759-1833). One day, four sisters from the Diveyevo Convent saw him across a field of ripe, brown grain. The sisters were on a road through the field, and their feet were on the ground. But as Serafim approached, they suddenly realized that the saint was “walking two foot above the ground, not even touching the grass.” Well attested by four nuns of unimpeachable character and faith, the event was duly recorded in the annals of St. Serafim and the convent; the truth it conveys is therefore beyond doubt. But walking above the grass, even by a saint of such holiness that the Tsar and Auto- crat of All the Russias sought him out as a confidant and spiritual father, is not encountered every day, and, it might even be suggested, cannot occur at all.1 This incident of faith illustrates both the nature of magical realism generally – the realistic and quotidian consequences of an impossible action – and the two varieties of magical realism employed in the tales of Nikolai Gogol. The first involves the direct and physical intervention of the divine or the demonic in an otherwise unexceptional flow of events. The second characteristic of Gogol’s magical realism implies the unex- pected violation of the laws of nature without a divine or demonic expla- nation. Gogol treated the divine, the demonic, or the supernatural event as entirely real, in a context no less Aristotelian than Platonic.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Examination of Dead Souls, the Master and Margarita, and Revelation 12-3
    LMU/LLS Theses and Dissertations Spring 2019 Understanding the Devil: A Comparative Examination of Dead Souls, The Master and Margarita, and Revelation 12-3 Thomas "TJ" Kennedy Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/etd Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Kennedy, Thomas "TJ", "Understanding the Devil: A Comparative Examination of Dead Souls, The Master and Margarita, and Revelation 12-3" (2019). LMU/LLS Theses and Dissertations. 772. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/etd/772 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in LMU/LLS Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Understanding the Devil: A Comparative Examination of Dead Souls, The Master and Margarita, and Revelation 12-13 by TJ Kennedy A thesis presented to the Faculty of the Department of Theology Loyola Marymount University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Theology May 7, 2019 Kennedy 1 Introduction Are you a devil?" "I am a man," answered Father Brown gravely; "and therefore have all devils in my heart. -G.K. Chesterton1 Evil begins where creation ends. In Zoroastrianism, Angra Mainyu propels the cause of druj (darkness), and is the antagonist to Ahura Mazda, the god of light.2 In Buddhism, the demon Mara often tries to tempt and trick the Buddha, including through kind words in the Padhaana Sutta of the Sutta-nipaata.
    [Show full text]
  • ALMA CLASSICS NEW BOOK INFORMATION EVERGREENS • £4.99 Dead Souls by Nikolai Gogol Translated by Donald Rayfi Eld
    ALMA CLASSICS NEW BOOK INFORMATION EVERGREENS • £4.99 Dead Souls by Nikolai Gogol Translated by Donald Rayfi eld “A word aptly uttered or written cannot be cut away by an axe.” SELLING POINTS: • Brand-new translation of Gogol’s masterpiece • Includes pictures and an extensive section on Gogol’s life and works • Follows the success of Gogol’s Petersburg Tales • Fully annotated edition DESCRIPTION: A mysterious stranger named Chichikov arrives in a small provincial Russian town and proceeds to visit a succession of landowners, making each of them an unusual and somewhat macabre proposition. He offers to buy the rights to the dead serfs who are SERIES: Alma Classics still registered on the landowner’s estate, thus reducing their liability for taxes. It is not Evergreens clear what Chichikov’s intentions are with the dead serfs he is purchasing, and despite May 25th 2017 his attempts to ingratiate himself, his strange behaviour arouses the suspicions of every- £4.99 one in the town. 978-1-84749-628-7 512 pp • PB A biting satire of social pretensions and pomposity, Dead Souls has been revered Subject: FC since its original publication in 1842 as one of the funniest and most brilliant novels of nineteenth-century Russia. Its unfl inching and remorseless depiction of venality in Russian society is a lasting tribute to Gogol’s comic genius. BY THE SAME AUTHOR: “Gogol was a strange creature, but then genius is always strange.” Vladimir Nabokov ABOUT THE AUTHOR: One of the leading fi gures in nineteenth-century Russian literature, Nikolai Gogol (1809–52) is best known for his satirical masterpiece, Dead Souls, and humorous plays and short stories such as The Government Inspector and The Overcoat, written in a highly original and trenchant style.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAM NOTES Leoš Janáček – Taras Bulba, Rhapsody
    PROGRAM NOTES Leoš Janáček – Taras Bulba, Rhapsody for Orchestra Leoš Janáček Born July 3, 1854, Hochwald (Hukvaldy), Northern Moravia. Died August 12, 1928, Moravska Ostravá, Czechoslovakia. Taras Bulba, Rhapsody for Orchestra Leoš Janáček loved all things Russian. He formed a Russian Club in Brno in 1897, visited Russia twice in the early years of the twentieth century, and even sent his children to Saint Petersburg to study. Of the Russian writers he admired, including Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, it was the novelist and playwright Nikolai Gogol he loved most. Janáček considered writing music based on Gogol's tale of Taras Bulba as early as 1905, although a decade passed before he started work on it. He completed the score three years later, the day before his sixty-first birthday. Still, Taras Bulba is one of Janáček's "early" compositions. Taras Bulba is Janáček's first significant orchestral work. Like Jenůfa, which was premiered in 1904 but didn't come to attention in the larger music world until it was staged in Prague in 1916, Taras Bulba would wait to find its audience. When it was finally performed for the first time in January 1924, Janácek left the hall as soon as the piece was over (the concert was billed as an early observance of his seventieth birthday and he didn't want to celebrate until the actual day arrived) and he failed to hear the enthusiastic crowd calling for him. The violent, bloody story of Taras Bulba is one of Gogol's most enduring and influential works. Ernest Hemingway called it "one of the ten greatest books of all time" (although Vladimir Nabokov, normally a Gogol admirer, likened it to "rollicking yarns about lumberjacks").
    [Show full text]
  • From the Writer
    From the Writer As my class was discussing “The Portrait,” a short story by Nikolai Gogol, we touched briefly on the topic of perception and the ways in which the artist in Gogol’s story loses control of the portrait he paints. I had been having trouble determining what to write about in my second paper, and I decided to pursue that subject because the gap between a writer’s intentions and the way his work is interpreted interests me. After I explored that theme in my second paper, I decided to return to it for my fourth paper and bring Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk into the discussion, as well as “The Overcoat,” another short story by Gogol. While it had been relatively easy to see the theme of the artist losing control of his work in “The Portrait,” I had a little more trouble connecting the other two stories to the topic in a meaning- ful way. Through studying critical essays onPoor Folk and analyzing the relevant sections of the text closely, I developed a position on Dostoevsky’s relevance to the subject, noting that he creates one of his characters, Makar Devushkin, as an amateur literary critic who misinterprets Gogol’s work. Once I began to find the connections the three stories shared, my interest in the concept helped me put together a strong argument. — Georgianne Maroon 13 Georgianne Maroon Prize Essay Winner Dostoevsky and Gogol’s Acknowledgments of Writers’ Limitations One of the more frustrating realizations most writers make during their careers is that their work, no matter how hard they try to craft it to communicate certain messages to their readers, always has the potential to be misinterpreted and misunderstood.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine in Blackface: Performance and Representation in Gogolʹ's "Dikanʹka Tales," Book 1 Author(S): Roman Koropeckyj and Robert Romanchuk Source: Slavic Review, Vol
    Ukraine in Blackface: Performance and Representation in Gogolʹ's "Dikanʹka Tales," Book 1 Author(s): Roman Koropeckyj and Robert Romanchuk Source: Slavic Review, Vol. 62, No. 3 (Autumn, 2003), pp. 525-547 Published by: Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3185805 Accessed: 06-09-2016 22:01 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Slavic Review This content downloaded from 128.97.156.104 on Tue, 06 Sep 2016 22:01:45 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms ARTICLES Ukraine in Blackface: Performance and Representation in Gogol"s Dikan'ka Tales, Book 1 Roman Koropeckyj and Robert Romanchuk If this entire people did not owe a debt to well-mannered landowners for their benevolence and respect for their humanity, the khokhol would be difficult to separate from the Negro in any way: one sweats over sugar, the other over grain. May the Lord give them both good health! -Prince I. M. Dolgorukii Three gestures connected with the publication of Vechera na khutore bliz Dikan'ki (Evenings on a farm near Dikan'ka, 1831) catch our eye, each one vying for a different audience for Nikolai Gogol"s first collection of stories.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Nikolai Gogol (1809-1852) the Overcoat Translated by Constance
    1 Nikolai Gogol (1809-1852) The Overcoat Translated by Constance Garnett Nikolai Gogol (1809-1852) was a Russian writer born in Ukraine and considered a founder of Russian realism, although elements of romanticism and the grotesque permeate his work. His most widely-read novels are Taras Bulba (1835), a historical romance, and Dead Souls (1842), a satirical novel critical of the Tsarist regime. “The Overcoat,” also known as “The Cloak,” was published in 1842. Fyodor Dostoyevsky is supposed to have said that all modern literature has come out of Gogol’s overcoat. In the department of—but it is better not to mention the department. There is nothing more irritable than departments, regiments, courts of justice, and, in a word, every branch of public service. Each individual attached to them nowadays thinks all society insulted in his person. Quite recently a complaint was received from a justice of the peace, in which he plainly demonstrated that all the imperial institutions were going to the dogs, and that the Czar's sacred name was being taken in vain; and in proof he appended to the complaint a romance in which the justice of the peace is made to appear about once every ten lines, and sometimes in a drunken condition. Therefore, in order to avoid all unpleasantness, it will be better to describe the department in question only as a certain department. So, in a certain department there was a certain official—not a very high one, it must be allowed—short of stature, somewhat pock-marked, red-haired, and short-sighted, with a bald forehead, wrinkled cheeks, and a complexion of the kind known as sanguine.
    [Show full text]
  • In an Early Letter to His Mother, Nikolai Gogol Observed That St. Petersburg
    Multifaceted Metaphor: Gogol’s Portrayal of St. Petersburg in Dead Souls Danielle Jones SUNY-Albany n an early letter to his mother, Nikolai Gogol observed that St. Petersburg was I not truly Russian: “Petersburg is not at all like other European capitals or Mos- cow. In general, every capital is characterized by its people, who throw their stamp of nationality on it; but Petersburg has no such character-stamp: the foreigners who settled here have made themselves at home and aren’t like foreigners at all, and the Russians in their turn have turned into foreigners—they aren’t one thing or the other” (29).1 This quotation provides an important insight into Gogol’s personal disillusionment with St. Petersburg which he expressed through increas- ingly elaborate and veiled means in his great works that culminated in Dead Souls. A close reading of Dead Souls in light of letters and biographical information high- lights how Gogol purposefully subverted the glamorous representation of St. Pe- tersburg typical of his day with the hope that his fellow countrymen would in turn examine their superficial and indolent lifestyles. Although written to his contem- poraries, Dead Souls remains important because it continues to be read in schools and by the larger Russian population. Thus, a critical study of Gogol’s portrayal of St. Petersburg highlights an imperative aspect of the historical and contempo- rary consciousness that has been shaped by Russians around its cultural and artis- tic capital. While scholars and readers alike acknowledge the importance of Dead Souls, this classic has received less critical attention than it merits; further, critics have not yet investigated the role of St.
    [Show full text]