Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills? S. Hrg. 108–553 BOGUS DEGREES AND UNMET EXPECTATIONS: ARE TAXPAYER DOLLARS SUBSIDIZING DIPLOMA MILLS? HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 11 AND 12, 2004 Printed for the use of the Committee on Governmental Affairs ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 94–487 PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:28 Aug 23, 2004 Jkt 094487 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\94487.TXT SAFFAIRS PsN: PHOGAN COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio CARL LEVIN, Michigan NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware PETER G. FITZGERALD, Illinois MARK DAYTON, Minnesota JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire FRANK LAUTENBERG, New Jersey RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama MARK PRYOR, Arkansas MICHAEL D. BOPP, Staff Director and Chief Counsel DAVID A. KASS, Chief Investigative Counsel JAMES R. MCKAY, Counsel EILEEN H. FISHER, Professional Staff Member CLAUDIA C. GELZER, U.S. Coast Guard Detailee SARAH V. TAYLOR, Legislative Aide JOYCE A. RECHTSCHAFFEN, Minority Staff Director and Counsel MARY BETH SCHULTZ, Minority Counsel AMY B. NEWHOUSE, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:28 Aug 23, 2004 Jkt 094487 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\94487.TXT SAFFAIRS PsN: PHOGAN C O N T E N T S Opening statements: Page Senator Collins ................................................................................................. 1, 31 Senator Akaka .................................................................................................. 4, 65 Senator Lautenberg .......................................................................................... 5 Senator Carper ................................................................................................. 13 Senator Durbin ................................................................................................. 23 Senator Lieberman ........................................................................................... 33 Senator Pryor .................................................................................................... 53 WITNESSES TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2004 Hon. Tom Davis, a Representative in Congress from the State of Virginia ....... 7 Robert J. Cramer, Managing Director, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. General Accounting Office, accompanied by Paul DeSaulniers, Senior Spe- cial Agent, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. General Accounting Office . 10 Lauri Gerald, Former Employee, Columbia State University ............................. 16 Alan Contreras, Administrator, Office of Degree Authorization, Oregon Stu- dent Assistance Commission ............................................................................... 26 WEDNESDAY, MAY 12, 2004 Alan Contreras, Administrator, Office of Degree Authorization, Oregon Stu- dent Assistance Commission ............................................................................... 34 Lieutenant Commander Claudia Gelzer, U.S. Coast Guard Detailee, Com- mittee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate ................................................... 38 Andrew Coulombe, Former Employee, Kennedy-Western University ................. 43 Sally L. Stroup, Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education, U.S. De- partment of Education ......................................................................................... 57 Stephen C. Benowitz, Associate Director, Human Resources Products and Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management ................................................ 60 ALPHABETICAL LIST OF WITNESSES Benowitz, Stephen C.: Testimony .......................................................................................................... 60 Prepared Statement ......................................................................................... 141 Contreras, Alan: Testimony .......................................................................................................... 26, 34 Prepared Statement with attachments ........................................................... 106 Coulombe, Andrew: Testimony .......................................................................................................... 43 Prepared Statement ......................................................................................... 132 Cramer, Robert J.: Testimony .......................................................................................................... 10 Prepared Statement with attachments ........................................................... 79 Davis, Hon. Tom: Testimony .......................................................................................................... 7 Prepared Statement ......................................................................................... 75 DeSaulniers, Paul: Testimony .......................................................................................................... 10 Gelzer, Lieutenant Commander Claudia: Testimony .......................................................................................................... 38 Prepared Statement ......................................................................................... 125 (III) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:28 Aug 23, 2004 Jkt 094487 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\94487.TXT SAFFAIRS PsN: PHOGAN IV Page Gerald, Lauri: Testimony .......................................................................................................... 16 Prepared Statement ......................................................................................... 100 Stroup, Sally L.: Testimony .......................................................................................................... 57 Prepared Statement ......................................................................................... 135 APPENDIX Memorandum dated April 15, 2004 ....................................................................... 47 Questions and responses for the Record from: Mr. Cramer ....................................................................................................... 148 Ms. Gerald ......................................................................................................... 151 Mr. Contreras ................................................................................................... 152 Mr. Benowitz ..................................................................................................... 155 EXHIBITS 1. Lexington University diploma for Susan M. Collins’ Bachelor of Science in Biology ........................................................................................................... 161 2. Lexington University diploma for Susan M. Collins’ Master of Science in Medical Technology ...................................................................................... 162 3. Chart entitled ‘‘5 Diploma Mills Generated $111 Million in Revenue (1995–2003)’’ ...................................................................................................... 163 4. ‘‘Federal Government Checks’’—made out to diploma mills ......................... 164 5. ‘‘Head Start Checks’’—displays checks from Head Start grantees made out to Kennedy-Western University on behalf of students ........................... 165 6. Poster: ‘‘The Legendary Entertainer Dr. Dante’’ ............................................ 166 7. Poster: ‘‘Dr. Dante and Friends . Hypnotist to the Stars’’ ...................... 167 8. Poster: ‘‘Zimmer Motor Cars’’ .......................................................................... 168 9. ‘‘Columbia State University’s Accreditation,’’ Columbia State University Catalog, page 5 ................................................................................................. 169 10. ‘‘Columbia State University’s Acceptance Letter’’ (from CSU’s catalog). This letter notes that honorary Ph.D.’s have been awarded to Jonas Salk, M.D., among others. It also states in the seal ‘‘Columbia State University—Since 1953’’ ................................................................................... 170 11. ‘‘Testimonial by a former Columbia State University ‘Student’ ’’, by Thom- as Rothchild, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. (from CSU’s catalog) .................................... 171 12. ‘‘U.S. Government Checks Toward Federal Employees’ Tuition at Colum- bia State University,’’ (four checks) ................................................................ 172 13. Chart of list of ‘‘Degrees Available from Columbia State University’’ (from CSU’s catalog). This chart highlights engineering, psychology and health fields ................................................................................................................... 173 14. Chart of Columbia State Photos: one fake, one real. One photo is from CSU’s catalog, and actually depicts Lyndhurst, a historic home in Tarrytown, NY (Hudson River Valley) ............................................................ 174 15. Sample of ‘‘Columbia State University Official Transcript,’’ (from CSU’s catalog) .............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Helpful Postsecondary Web Links
    Postsecondary Education Links Last Updated: 7/16/13 Career Education Consumer Report http://www.mycareereducation.org/ The Career Education Consumer Report functions as Michigan’s workforce eligible training provider list. Michigan's Career Education Consumer Report is an electronic service in America that can help you find career education programs that are available in your area and help you choose one that fits your needs. Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) http://www.chea.org/default.asp CHEA is an association of 3,000 degree-granting colleges and universities and recognizes 60 institutional and programmatic accrediting organizations. This website is an authoritative source of data and information about regional, faith-based, private career and programmatic accreditors. It also contains databases and directories of accredited institutions and programs and accreditation or quality assurance bodies. Federal Student Aid: Closed School Information http://studentaid.ed.gov/PORTALSWebApp/students/english/closedschool.jsp?tab=attending Information on how to receive a student loan debt discharged if your school closed while you were enrolled. Federal Student Aid: The Office of Ombudsman http://www.ombudsman.ed.gov/ The Federal Student Aid Ombudsman of the Department of Education helps resolve disputes and solve other problems with federal student loans. Federal Trade Commission Facts for Consumers: Choosing a Career or Vocational School http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/products/pro13.pdf Provides tips on how to choose a career or vocational school that is reputable and trustworthy. How To Check Any Online School's Accreditation Status in One Minute or Less http://distancelearn.about.com/od/accreditationinfo/ht/checkaccredit.htm Here's how to find out if a school is accredited by an agency recognized by the United States Department of Education Job Seeker Tools http://careeronestop.org/jobseekertools/ Contains a list of top-rated job tool Web sites that include information on job openings, careers, and career advancement.
    [Show full text]
  • Postsecondary Registration: Limiting Diploma Mills Fiscal TOPICS
    Postsecondary Registration: Limiting Diploma Mills Fiscal TOPICS Published November 2008 Postsecondary Registration: Limiting Diploma Mills Chapter 261B, Code of Iowa seven representatives from two- and specialized accrediting associations. The (Registration of Postsecondary Schools) four-year public and private colleges U.S. Department of Education (USDE) does is intended to “provide protection for and universities and specialized not accredit colleges as is done by its persons choosing institutions and vocational schools and advises the ministry counterparts in many foreign programs by ensuring that accurate and Secretary of State in the countries. Instead, the USDE recognizes complete information about institutions administration of Chapter 261B. private, non-profit organizations to fulfill and programs is available to these • The Iowa Coordinating Council for this function. The Council for Higher persons and to the public.” The Post-High School Education is a 25- Education Accreditation (CHEA) is a postsecondary registration process member board made up of higher private, nonprofit national organization that regulates which institutions may offer education stakeholders. The Council coordinates accreditation and recognizes college courses and degrees within the provides voluntary cooperation and accrediting agencies in conjunction with the State. This is how Iowa limits the coordination among the various USDE. operation of diploma mills within the boards and institutions that are There are approximately 80 accrediting State. responsible for post-high school organizations in the United States that are “Diploma mills (or degree mills) are education in Iowa and advises the recognized by CHEA and/or the USDE. substandard or fraudulent ‘colleges’ College Student Aid Commission. These organizations accredit more than that offer degrees to students with little Institutions Not Required to Register 6,800 institutions and 18,000 programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Colleges and Diploma Mills Small Private Colleges Marketing to Overseas Students Are Also Found to Be Acting As “Study Centres” for Diploma Mill Universities
    Diploma and Accreditation Mills: New Trends in Credential Abuse March 2011 By Eyal Ben Cohen And Rachel Winch Diploma and Accreditation Mills: New Trends in Credential Abuse ©2011 by Verifile Limited and Accredibase™ Verifile y Accredibase Bedford I-Lab Stannard Way Priory Business Park Bedford, Great Britain MK44 3RZ Tel: +44 (0)1234 834670 Fax: +44 (0)1234 834671 Email: [email protected] Website: www.accredibase.com All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any form or by any means, stored in a database or retrieval system, or conveyed via the Internet or a Web site without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. Making copies of any part of this publication for any purpose other than your personal use is a violation of copyright laws. The material in this publication is presented for educational and informational purposes only and is not offered or intended as legal advice in any manner whatsoever. Contents 1 Contents Introduction .................................................................................. 3 Chapter 1 So, What are Diploma and Accreditation Mills?.................... 5 Chapter 2 What’s the Big Problem?......................................................... 8 Diploma Mills on Display Chapter 3 Webs of Deceipt ..................................................................... 11 University Degree Program Chapter 4 High School Diploma Mills...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tough Love: Bottom-Line Quality Standards for Colleges HIGHER EDUCATION
    Tough Love: Bottom-Line Quality Standards for Colleges HIGHER EDUCATION 2014 18, June for EmbargoedTO THE POINT Roughly $180 billion in federal student aid and tax benefits are provided each year to colleges and universities with virtually no consideration of institution performance on low-income student access, degree- completion, and post-enrollment success measures. Some 600,000 undergraduates attend four-year colleges that fall below the barest minimum standards of institutional success, including drop- out rates in excess of 85 percent. Over $15 billion is distributed annually to more than 300 colleges that qualify as engines of inequality, dropout JUNE 2014 factories, or diploma mills. Recommended is targeted assistance to persistently underperforming public and nonprofit colleges and tough consequences, including cutting off federal aid, for those institutions that fail to improve within a reasonable period of time. The federal government provides roughly $180 billion in the form of student financial aid and tax benefits to American colleges and universities2014 in a typical year. 18, June When the checksfor are written, an institution’s performance on access, completion, and post-enrollment success Embargoed measures essentially doesn’t matter. Copyright © 2014 The Education Trust. All rights reserved. Tough Love: Bottom-Line Quality Standards for Colleges BY MICHAEL DANNENBERG AND MARY NGUYEN BARRY The world is changing. Physical stamina and a good work ethic are no longer enough to secure a stable future. Obtaining a quality education, especially a college education, is the surest way to gain a lasting foothold in today’s economy.1 Most Americans realize this, and as a result, college aspiration and college-going rates are rising among all demographic groups — rich, poor, white, and students of color.2 But U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy of a Diploma Mill
    The Anatomy of a Diploma Mill Jennie Duggan Brown University * * The views herein are that of the author’s, not that of her employers The Pitch Source: confidenDaldegree.com Diploma Mills • Degrees obtained from unaccredited universiDes in exchange for $ – DisDnct from counterfeiters and distance educaon • Est. 200k degrees purchased per year – Probably “confer” more degrees per year than any single state except for CA and NY • Billion dollar industry • Common purposes: – Job qualificaon – PromoDons/raises – Visa hacking – IdenDty theV Why are they bad news? How students get caught • Promoted to prominent posiDon – Publish bio online • Alienated colleagues • Take on life-or-death responsibiliDes • Harp on credenDals (“call me doctor”) • Too many specifics – University locaon – Recent dates • Federal gov’t sweeps What separates them from real universiDes? • In pracDce: state degree granDng rights – May be accredited by an under-developed country, or self-signing • Award degrees based on life experience – Few or no teaching faciliDes • Degree referral services • Pay by the degree rather than by credits • A .edu address is not enough! What separates them? (con’d) • In US, degree-granDng rights awarded by: – Congress, – Sovereign Indian tribes – States • >98% of universiDes licensed by state • Most fakes register as non-public secular orgs • Accreditaon is voluntary • DMs exploit this loophole How do they stay in business? • Use of the word “accredited” is policed by the FTC – Have not enforced law once to date • It is best to be from Idaho,
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Mill Legislation Definitions and Regulations
    May 2012 Diploma Mill Legislation Definitions and Regulations Council for Higher Education Accreditation - Diploma Mill Info *Specified by the Oregon Office of Degree Authorization to have broad laws prohibiting/restricting use of fraudulent degrees *Oregon Oregon Office of Degree Authorization – said to have the most comprehensive list of unaccredited colleges that are and are not approved for use within the state (other states use as a guide as well) SB 198 (2007): Defines diploma mill. Excludes from definition schools that offer degrees in only theology or religious occupations and schools making reasonable progress toward accreditation. Authorizes Oregon Student Assistance Commission to terminate activities of diploma mills and unrecognized post-secondary accrediting bodies. Adjusts for inflation the schedule of application fees for conferring degrees. Adds fee for partial degree programs. Authorizes commission to assess costs for use of experts to evaluate programs. SB 114 (2009): Prohibits person who receives degree from diploma mill from using disclaimer to claim or represent that person possesses academic degree. ORS § 348.594 - Definitions As used in ORS 348.594 to 348.615: (1)(a) “Diploma mill” means: (A) A school against which a court or public body, as defined in ORS 174.109, has issued a ruling or finding, after due process procedures, that the school has engaged in dishonest, fraudulent or deceptive practices related to the award of degrees, academic standards or student learning requirements; or (B) An entity without legal authority as a school to issue degrees valid as credentials in the jurisdiction that authorizes issuance of degrees. (b) “Diploma mill” does not include: (A) A school operating legally under ORS 348.604; or Page | 1 May 2012 (B) A school that is actively seeking and able to show evidence of reasonable progress toward regional accreditation with one of the regional post-secondary accrediting bodies recognized by the United States Department of Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Hands-On Admissions: Diploma Mills Ann M
    Hands-On Admissions: Diploma Mills Ann M. Koenig, AACRAO International Education Services, USA [email protected] www.aacrao.org/international/ ©AACRAO 2006 HANDS-ON ADMISSIONS: Diploma Mills What is a “diploma mill”? A “diploma mill” or “degree mill” is an organization or individual that produces and sells diplomas, degrees, transcripts, or other academic records that are meant to give the impression of academic achievement, but really represent little or no study . Such credentials are “bogus” – “fakes” that give a false impression of educational achievement. Worthless documents from bodies that are not real, or not recognized, educational institutions Fraudulent misrepresentations of documents issued by legitimate institutions Why is diploma mill fraud a problem? Why is confirming the status of questionable institutions important? Ethical Reasons: Admission based on unexamined documents supports and rewards fraud. This devalues legitimate education and marks the higher education institution (HEI) as an easy target for fraudulent activity. Legal Reasons: By not reviewing documents carefully, the HEI could be violating the law. In most countries, being a part of a legal system that regulates credentials gives HEIs legal obligations. Practical Reasons: When it becomes known that a HEI supports fraud, its reputation suffers, and honest students stay away. Fraud is expensive; it takes resources away from honest applicants, and the process of trying to “fix” a problem case, or rebuild an entire reputation, wastes resources. What is the solution? Be PROACTIVE. Be prepared for FRAUD! Take fraud seriously. Educate yourself and your colleagues. Learn how to identify, collect and effectively use reliable sources of information. Do not rely on “lists”; learn how to analyze and research documents to confirm their legitimacy.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Economics of Fake Degrees Gilles Grolleau, Tarik Lakhal, Naoufel Mzoughi
    An introduction to the Economics of Fake Degrees Gilles Grolleau, Tarik Lakhal, Naoufel Mzoughi To cite this version: Gilles Grolleau, Tarik Lakhal, Naoufel Mzoughi. An introduction to the Economics of Fake Degrees. Journal of Economic Issues, Newfound Press, 2008, 42 (3), pp.673-693. halshs-00326238 HAL Id: halshs-00326238 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00326238 Submitted on 17 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. An Introduction to the Economics of Fake Degrees Gilles Grolleau, Tarik Lakhal and Naoufel Mzoughi Publsihed in Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XLII, No. 3, September 2008, pp. 673-693 Gilles Grolleau is an Associate Professor at Montpellier Supagro and a Researcher at the Laboratoire Montpelliérain d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée (LAMETA, UMR 1135). Tarik Lakhal is a PhD student at the Université de Bourgogne. Naoufel Mzoughi is a Research Fellow at INRA Avignon. The authors are particularly indebted to George Brown for his numerous detailed and helpful comments. They are also grateful to Cesar Furtado, Deli Yang, Luuk Van Kempen, George Gollin, Daniel Schugurensky, Jean Bourdon, Kristina Lybecker, Sara Solnick, and partici- pants to the annual meeting of the Canadian Economic Association (May, 27-29, 2005, Hamilton) for stimulating conversations and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Screw U: a Random Walk Through the Diploma Mill “This Is An
    Screw U: A Random Walk Through The Diploma Mill “This is an industry that is ripe for, begging for, regulation.” -Senator Tom Harkin, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) As of last year, the for-profit education sector accounted for 13 percent of postsecondary students; however, they account for about 50 percent of all student loan defaults.1 One of the main causes of this disproportion is because the majority of students who attend for-profit schools never graduate; at the University of Phoenix, the flagship university of this sector, only about 9% of students graduate within six years (Only 5% graduate in their online program, which houses 175,200 students as of 2008).2 To exacerbate this problem, schools like University of Phoenix charge about four times the tuition of a typical non-profit institution.3 These schools prey on the vulnerable and disadvantaged, for they have the best access to federal aid and zero clue of what they are signing up for. In the past, we have seen multiple industries operate in the manner; notably the banking sector with sub-prime borrowers. In that case and in this one, employees are deluding the uneducated, and selling them the American Dream on borrowed money. As we know now, defaulted loans will dry up credit; with default rates growing exponentially, the federal credit line is about to stop. 1 U.S. Department of Education, IPEDS 12-month enrollment for 2011-12 and FY 2010 three-year CDRs. 2 The Education Trust, Subprime Opportunity: The unfulfilled promise of for-profit colleges and universities, November 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • DEGREES for SALE: the DIPLOMA MILLS PROBLEM CONTINUES by Emily Tse, International Education Research Foundation (IERF)
    DEGREES FOR SALE: THE DIPLOMA MILLS PROBLEM CONTINUES By Emily Tse, International Education Research Foundation (IERF) In 2010, a study identified 23 individuals on LinkedIn who claimed degrees from Almeda University, a known diploma mill (Prouix, 2010). Just two years later, in a separate study published in 2012, the number catapulted to 2,500 individuals on LinkedIn claiming qualifications from the same institution (Ezell and Bear, 2012). In 2015, in a third study, the number increased again to 4,000 individuals listing credentials from Almeda University (Neifer, 2015). While this trend speaks to the overall growth of the professional networking site, it also can range from several hundred dollars a source for much confusion and as a draws attention to the alarming growth to several thousand. loophole for diploma mills in the U.S. of degrees issued from diploma mills. And yet, this pattern represents only one Confusion Breeds Opportunity The rise of alternative forms of among the estimated 5,000 diploma Despite the dubious locations of education, and the recognition of these mills that exist today (Ezell, 2015), many diploma mills, the United States various forms, have also added to the confusion. For instance, online degree suggesting that the overall collective has been established as the most number would be exponentially larger. programs have become commonplace, popular site for degree mill operators. Also, although Almeda University’s particularly with advancements in Nevertheless, wherever the location website is no longer in operation, it is technology. Equally common is awarding may be, their global reach is far and evident on LinkedIn that their degrees credit based on examinations (e.g., wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Diploma Mills: a Legal Overview Name Redacted Legislative Attorney
    Diploma Mills: A Legal Overview name redacted Legislative Attorney March 3, 2006 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL32144 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Diploma Mills: A Legal Overview Summary This report provides an analysis of state and federal laws regarding diploma mills, which offer students academic degrees for little or no meaningful academic work. Specifically, this report addresses the criminal, civil, and common law ramifications for both the manufacturers and distributors of phony degrees, as well as for the buyers and users of such degrees. This analysis does not address counterfeit degrees that purport to be from existing accredited universities, but rather focuses primarily on the legal issues surrounding phony degrees from entities that provide diplomas without requiring an appropriate level of academic achievement. Congressional Research Service Diploma Mills: A Legal Overview Contents I. Introduction.............................................................................................................................1 II. Federal Oversight of Diploma Mills........................................................................................2 Use of Diploma Mill Degrees in Federal Employment...........................................................6 III. State Oversight of Diploma Mills ..........................................................................................9 IV. Common Law Tort Actions Against Diploma Mills.............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARUCC 2012 Conference June 26-28, 2012
    ARUCC 2012 Conference June 26-28, 2012 Workshop 5 – Getting the Skinny on Fraudulent Documents Contact Information • Roger W. Hur, Manager • Phone: 604-454-2200 • Toll-Free: 1-866-434-9197 • Fax 604-435-7033 • Email: [email protected] • Web: www.bcit.ca/ices Outline: • ICES Background – ICES Document authentication process and procedure • Electronic document management – Document Fraud Samples – Introduction – Characterization of Fraud – Reference materials and resources – Sample documents • Diploma/Accreditation Mills – Definition – Samples • Canadian Credential Fraud – Samples/stories • Challenges and Impact • Conclusion Forensic Scanner – Document Examination The VSC40 provides comprehensive facilities for examining: ● UV activated fluorescent features and fibres ● Infrared activated anti-Stokes fluorescent features ●Watermarks and metallic strips ● Variations in the infrared absorption and reflectance of inks and ‘IR drop out’ inks ● Retro-reflective images ● Variations in the infrared luminescence of inks ● DOVDs, holograms and kinegrams ● Surface features such as embossed stamps, intaglio printing and paper texture using oblique lighting ● Paper quality, by assessing the level of paper fluorescence ● Print quality, using high magnification up to x43 (approximate, on-screen) ● ICAO coded data ● Invisibly embedded information (IPI) Islamic Azad University Islamic Azad University Document Fraud Samples • Bangladesh – National University – Gazipur • China – Bachelor • Iraq – Medical Degree • India - Panjab University, Master of Arts
    [Show full text]