DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 04:54:26AM Via Free Access

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 04:54:26AM Via Free Access JOBNAME: EE3 Hodgson PAGE: 1 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Thu Jun 27 12:20:19 2019 References Acemoglu, Daron and Johnson, Simon (2005) ‘Unbundling Institutions’, Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), October, pp. 949–95. Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A. (2001) ‘The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investi- gation’, American Economic Review, 91(5), December, pp. 1369–401. Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A. (2002) ‘Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern Income Distribution’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), November, pp. 1231–94. Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A. (2005a) ‘Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth’, in Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven N. (eds) Handbook of Economic Growth: Volume 1A (North Holland: Elsevier), pp. 385–472. Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A. (2005b) ‘The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change and Economic Growth’, American Economic Review, 95(3), June, pp. 546–79. Acemoglu, Daron, Cantoni, Davide, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A. (2011) ‘The Consequences of Radical Reform: The French Revolution’, American Economic Review, 101(7), December, pp. 3286– 307. Ackerman, Robert (1976) The Philosophy of Karl Popper (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press). Adaman, Fikret and Devine, Patrick (1996) ‘The Economic Calculation Debate: Lessons for Socialists’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20(5), September, pp. 523–37. Aglietta, Michel (1979) A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience, trans. by David Fernbach from the French edn of 1976 (London: NLB). Aistleitner, Matthias, Kapeller, Jakob and Steinerberger, Stefan (2018) ‘The Power of Scientometrics and the Development of Economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, 52(3), September, pp. 816–34. Akerlof, George A. and Kranton, Rachel E. (2010) Identity Economics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). Albert, Michael (2004) ‘Market Madness’, Znet. Available at http:// zcomm.org/znetarticle/market-madness-by-michael-albert-1/. (Retrieved 1 October 2014.) 176 Geoffrey M. Hodgson - 9781789901597 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 04:54:26AM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Hodgson2-Is_there_a_future_for_heterodox_economics / Division: 07-References_GH /Pg. Position: 1 / Date: 16/5 JOBNAME: EE3 Hodgson PAGE: 2 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Thu Jun 27 12:20:19 2019 References 177 Alchian, Armen A. (1950) ‘Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 58(2), June, pp. 211–22. Aldrich, Howard E. (1999) Organizations Evolving (London: Sage). Aldrich, Howard E. and Ruef, Martin (2006) Organizations Evolving, 2nd edn (London: Sage). Aldrich, Howard E., Hodgson, Geoffrey M., Hull, David L., Knudsen, Thorbjørn, Mokyr, Joel and Vanberg, Viktor J. (2008) ‘In Defence of Generalized Darwinism’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(5), October, pp. 577–96. Allen, Peter M. and McGlade, J.M. (1987) ‘Modelling Complex Human Systems: A Fisheries Example’, European Journal of Operational Research, 30(2), pp. 147–67. Allen, R.T. (1998) Beyond Liberalism: The Political Thought of F.A. Hayek and Michael Polanyi (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction). Aoki, Masahiko (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). Arndt, H.W. (1984) ‘Political Economy’, Economic Record, 60(3), Sep- tember, pp. 266–73. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1978) ‘A Cautious Case for Socialism’, Dissent, 25, Fall, pp. 472–80. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1994) ‘Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge’, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 84(2), May, pp. 1–9. Arrow, Kenneth J. and Hahn, Frank H. (1971) General Competitive Analysis (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd). Arthur, W. Brian, Durlauf, Steven N. and Lane, David A. (eds) (1997) The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II (Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley). Aspromourgos, Tony (1986) ‘On the Origins of the term “Neoclassical”’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 10(3), September, pp. 265–70. Atkinson, Anthony B. (2015) Inequality: What Can Be Done? (Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press). Axelrod, Robert M. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books). Ayres, Clarence E. (1944) The Theory of Economic Progress (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press). Backhouse, Roger E. (1996) ‘The Changing Character of British Eco- nomics’, History of Political Economy, Annual Supplement to Volume 28, pp. 33–60. Backhouse, Roger E. (1998) ‘The Transformation of U.S. Economics, 1920–1960, Viewed through a Survey of Journal Articles’, in Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcolm H. (eds) The Transformation of Geoffrey M. Hodgson - 9781789901597 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 04:54:26AM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Hodgson2-Is_there_a_future_for_heterodox_economics / Division: 07-References_GH /Pg. Position: 2 / Date: 16/5 JOBNAME: EE3 Hodgson PAGE: 3 SESS: 5 OUTPUT: Thu Jun 27 12:20:19 2019 178 Is there a future for heterodox economics? American Economics: From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassi- cism, Annual Supplement to Volume 30 of History of Political Economy (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), pp. 85–107. Backhouse, Roger E. (2000), ‘Progress in Heterodox Economics’, Jour- nal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), 149–57. Backhouse, Roger E. (2004), ‘A Suggestion for Clarifying the Study of Dissent in Economics’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(2), 261–71. Backhouse, Roger E. and Cherrier, Béatrice (2017) ‘The Age of the Applied Economist: The Transformation of Economics since the 1970s’, History of Political Economy, 49 (Supplement), pp. 1–33. Bannister, Robert C. (1988) Social Darwinism: Science and Myth, 2nd edn, with a new preface (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press). BBC News (2011) ‘Chile Recognises 9,800 more Victims of Pinochet’s Rule’, BBC News, 18 August. Available at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ world-latin-america-14584095. (Retrieved 6 December 2018.) Becker, Gary S. (1968) ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’, Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), March–April, pp. 169–217. Becker, Gary S. (1976a) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press). Becker, Gary S. (1976b) ‘Altruism, Egoism, and Genetic Fitness: Eco- nomics and Sociobiology’, Journal of Economic Literature, 14(2), December, pp. 817–26. Becker, Gary S. (1991) A Treatise on the Family, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). Berg, Nathan and Gigerenzer, Gerd (2010) ‘As-if Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise?’, History of Economic Ideas, 18(1), pp. 133–66. Berger, Sebastian (2017) The Social Costs of Neoliberalism: Essays on the Economics of K. William Kapp (Nottingham: Spokesman). Bertalanffy, Ludwig (1950) ‘The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology’, Science, 111, pp. 23–9. Besley, Timothy and Hennessy, Peter (2009) ‘Letter to Her Majesty the Queen’, 22 July. Available at http://wwwf.imperial.ac.uk/~bin06/ M3A22/queen-lse.pdf. (Retrieved 7 December 2018.) Bhaskar, Roy (1975) A Realist Theory of Science (Leeds: Leeds Books). Bhaskar, Roy (1986) Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation (Lon- don: Verso). Bhaskar, Roy (1989) Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy (London: Verso). Geoffrey M. Hodgson - 9781789901597 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 04:54:26AM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Hodgson2-Is_there_a_future_for_heterodox_economics / Division: 07-References_GH /Pg. Position: 3 / Date: 13/6 JOBNAME: EE3 Hodgson PAGE: 4 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Thu Jun 27 12:20:19 2019 References 179 Bhaskar, Roy and Collier, Andrew (1998) ‘Introduction: Explanatory Critiques’, in Archer, Margaret S., Bhaskar, Roy, Collier, Andrew, Lawson, Tony and Norrie, Alan (eds) Critical Realism: Essential Readings (London: Routledge), pp. 385–94. Bhupatiraju, Samyukta, Nomaler, Önder, Triulzi, Giorgio and Verspagen, Bart (2012) ‘Knowledge Flows – Analyzing the Core Literature of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Science and Technology Studies’, Research Policy, 41(7), pp. 1205–18. Bladel, John P. (2005) ‘Against Polanyi-Centrism: Hayek and the Re-emergence of “Spontaneous Order”’, Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 8(4), Winter, pp. 15–30. Blau, Peter J. (1994) The Organization of Academic Work (New Bruns- wick, NJ: Transaction). Blaug, Mark (1974) The Cambridge Revolution: Success or Failure? (London: Institute of Economic Affairs). Blaug, Mark (1975) ‘Kuhn versus Lakatos, or Paradigms versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics’, History of Political Economy, 7(4), Winter, pp. 399–433. Blaug, Mark (1990) Economic Theories: True or False? Essays on the History and Methodology of Economics (Aldershot, UK and Brook- field, VT, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing). Blaug, Mark (1992) The Methodology of Economics: Or How Econo- mists Explain, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Blaug, Mark (1993) Review of D.R. Steele From Marx to Mises, Economic Journal, 103(6), November, pp. 1570–71. Blaug, Mark (1997) ‘Ugly Currents in Modern Economics’, Options Politiques, 18(17), September, pp. 3–8. Extended and revised in Mäki, Uskali (ed.) (2002) Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction (Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press), pp. 35–56. Blaug, Mark (1999) ‘The Formalist Revolution or What Happened to Orthodox Economics After World War II?’ in Backhouse, Roger E. and Creedy, John (eds)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainability, the Social Economy, and the Eco-Social Crisis: Traveling Concepts and Bridging Fields
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Athabasca University Library Institutional Repository Sustainability, the Social Economy, and the Eco-social Crisis: Traveling Concepts and Bridging Fields by Lena K. Soots Centre for Sustainable Community Development – Simon Fraser University BC–Alberta Social Economy Research Alliance (BALTA) Michael Gismondi Athabasca University BC–Alberta Social Economy Research Alliance (BALTA) June 2008 LKSoots & MGismondi (June 2008) 1 Copyright © 2010, Canadian Centre for Community Renewal (CCCR) on behalf of the B.C.-Alberta Social Economy Research Alliance For further information, contact the BC-Alberta Social Economy Research Alliance, PO Box 1161, Port Alberni, B.C. V9Y 7M1, (tel) 250-723-2296 Website: www.socialeconomy-bcalberta.ca e-mail: [email protected] Author Information Lena K. Soots is a doctoral candidate in the Faculty of Education at Simon Fraser University. Lena is also an Instructor/Researcher with the Centre for Sustainable Community Development at Simon Fraser University. She has worked with BALTA as a student researcher on various research projects since 2006. Dr. Michael Gismondi is Professor of Sociology at Athabasca University. and Director of AU’s Master of Arts in Integrated Studies program until 2010. Mike is an Adjunct Professor of Sociology at the University of Alberta and a Research Fellow with the Centre for Research in Latin American and Caribbean Studies at York University. This paper has been produced as part of the research program of the BC- Alberta Social Economy Research Alliance (BALTA). Financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Capitalism Through Real Utopias
    ASRXXX10.1177/000312241246 4688828882American Sociological ReviewWright 2012 2012 Presidential Address American Sociological Review 78(1) 1 –25 Transforming Capitalism © American Sociological Association 2012 DOI: 10.1177/0003122412468882 through Real Utopias http://asr.sagepub.com Erik Olin Wrighta Abstract This address explores a broad framework for thinking sociologically about emancipatory alter- natives to dominant institutions and social structures, especially capitalism. The framework is grounded in two foundational propositions: (1) Many forms of human suffering and many defi- cits in human flourishing are the result of existing institutions and social structures. (2) Trans- forming existing institutions and social structures in the right way has the potential to substan- tially reduce human suffering and expand the possibilities for human flourishing. An emancipa- tory social science responding to these propositions faces four broad tasks: specifying the moral principles for judging social institutions; using these moral principles as the standards for diagnosis and critique of existing institutions; developing an account of viable alternatives in response to the critique; and proposing a theory of transformation for realizing those alterna- tives. The idea of “real utopias” is one way of thinking about alternatives and transformation. “There is no alternative” – Margaret and social structures. My focus is mainly on Thatcher, early 1980s the problem of alternatives to capitalism, but “Another world is possible” – motto of the aUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison World Social Forum, 2000s Corresponding Author: Erik Olin Wright, Department of Sociology, In this address I explore a broad frame- University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1180 work for thinking sociologically about eman- Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706 cipatory alternatives to dominant institutions E-mail: [email protected] 2 American Sociological Review 78(1) much of what I have to say would apply to ways that deepen and broaden the possibility other dominant institutions as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Solidarity Economy & Economy
    SocialEconomy & Solidarity Economy Transformative concepts for unprecedented times? By Mike Lewis & Dan Swinney “Community economic development,” “economic Exploring the Conceptual Terrain democracy,” “worker ownership,” “co-operative economy,” “fair trade,” “sustainable community The social economy can be understood to lie within what John development,” “social economy” – a range of move- Pearce calls the“third system” of the economy, as opposed to the “first” (private/profit-oriented) and“second” systems (public ments currently challenges the way North America service/planned provision). This third system also includes the lives and works. voluntary sector, a range of associations, and the family economy. In addition to a tremendous body of talent and They share an orientation to self-help, to reciprocity, and to practice, they share a range of concepts, accumulated realizing social purpose through various types of organization experience and, to a lesser extent, related research. and association. (See Diagram 1,“Three Systems.”)1 All seek to reinsert social goals into the heart of our economic life, an agenda contrary to the economic Diagram 1: Three Systems of the Economy model of the last four decades. Many have roots in the 19th century struggles of people relegated to the Market-driven Planned Economy margins by the industrial revolution. Others have Trading Non-trading grown out of the modern“margins,” where the BlackBl Economy First System GLOBAL Second System Private PublicService ack Economy failures of “free market” orthodoxy have created ProfitOriented Planned Provision enclaves in which people have few options other NATIO NAL / than to invent economic alternatives. REG ION AL “Social economy” and“solidarity economy” are two frame- works for understanding the economic alternatives springing up DIST RICT / L OC around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayek on Expectations: the Interplay Between Two Complex Systems Agnès Festré
    Hayek on expectations: The interplay between two complex systems Agnès Festré To cite this version: Agnès Festré. Hayek on expectations: The interplay between two complex systems. 2018. hal- 01931730 HAL Id: hal-01931730 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01931730 Preprint submitted on 22 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. HAYEK ON EXPECTATIONS: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN TWO COMPLEX SYSTEMS Documents de travail GREDEG GREDEG Working Papers Series Agnès Festré GREDEG WP No. 2018-28 https://ideas.repec.org/s/gre/wpaper.html Les opinions exprimées dans la série des Documents de travail GREDEG sont celles des auteurs et ne reflèlent pas nécessairement celles de l’institution. Les documents n’ont pas été soumis à un rapport formel et sont donc inclus dans cette série pour obtenir des commentaires et encourager la discussion. Les droits sur les documents appartiennent aux auteurs. The views expressed in the GREDEG Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the institution. The Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Economy” in the Time of Crisis
    The “Social Economy” in the time of crisis Katerina Vlasaki Dr. of Political Science and Public Administration-National & Kapodistrian University of Athens Sociologist, MSc in Public Policy Abstract During the crisis (2008 - ) a “new Social Economy” seems to be emerging in the European Union. It supports “solidarity economy” by promoting enterprises mainly cooperatives into the “active welfare state”. The new forms of “Social Economy” were introduced in the Greek public policy through the European Strategy 2020 ("Europe 2020"), recorded by the Law 4019/2011 and reflected in the national and regional strategic development frameworks for 2014-2020 through the adoption of specific objectives mainly related to the Social Cooperative Enterprises (Koin.S.Ep). The “new Social Economy” seeks to potentially be established as a core value of social policy in Greece in order to be the main element of the overall policy making that will potentially lead the Greek public administration to limit the consequences of the economic recession such as: unemployment, poverty and social exclusion. As part of the efforts made by the Greek public administration to the direction of combating poverty and social exclusion, the interest is focusing on the interpretation of the “Social Economy” in public policy and its specific institutional environment in Communication Address: 4 Stamatiou Sarma Str. 71601, Heraklion, Crete, Greece Tel.: +30 6979774364, e-mail: [email protected] Greece. Given the fact that the “new Social Economy” is still at a very early stage of implementation the interest is enhanced by the ability to provide timely responses to policy making through the comprehension of the Greek social policy and administration.
    [Show full text]
  • American Political Thought
    AMERICAN POLITICAL THOUGHT 00-Whittington-FM.indd 1 28/10/15 5:50 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 159102 Cust: OUP Au: Whittington Pg. No. i K S4CARLISLE Title: American Political Thought 1e Short / Normal Publishing Services 00-Whittington-FM.indd 2 28/10/15 5:50 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 159102 Cust: OUP Au: Whittington Pg. No. ii K S4CARLISLE Title: American Political Thought 1e Short / Normal Publishing Services AMERICAN POLITICAL THOUGHT READINGS AND MATERIALS Keith E. Whittington PRINCETON UNIVERSITY NEW YORK OXFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 00-Whittington-FM.indd 3 28/10/15 5:50 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 159102 Cust: OUP Au: Whittington Pg. No. iii K S4CARLISLE Title: American Political Thought 1e Short / Normal Publishing Services Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2017 by Oxford University Press For titles covered by Section 112 of the US Higher Education Opportunity Act, please visit www.oup.com/us/he for the latest information about pricing and alternate formats. Published by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 http://www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond New Keynesian Economics: Towards a Post Walrasian Macroeconomics*
    Beyond New Keynesian Economics: Towards a Post Walrasian Macroeconomics* David Colander, Middlebury College1 In the early 1990s in a two-volume edited book (Mankiw and Romer 1990) and in two survey articles (Gordon 1991, Mankiw 1990), the economics profession has seen the popularization of a new school of Keynesian macroeconomics. Now it's becoming commonplace to say that there's New Keynesian economics, to go along with post Keynesian economics (no hyphen), post-Keynesians economics (with hyphen), neoKeynesian economics (sometimes with a hyphen, sometimes not), and, of course, just plain Keynesian economics. While the development of a New Keynesian terminology was inevitable after the New Classical terminology came into being--for every Classical variation there exists a Keynesian counterpart--it is not so clear that the new classification system adds much to our understanding. There are now so many dimensions of Keynesian and Classical thought that the nomenclature is becoming more confusing than helpful. Most economists I talk to, even Greg Mankiw who edited the book that popularized the term, are tired of the infinite variations on the Keynesian/Classical theme.2 I agree. But the fact that the Keynesian/Classical variations have played out does not resolve the problem of how one explains to non-specialists the variations in approaches to macro that exist. * I would like to thank Robert Clower, Paul Davidson, Hans van Ees, Harry Garretsen, Robert Gordon, Kenneth Koford, Jeffrey Miller, Michael Parkin, Richard Startz, and participants at seminars at the University of Alberta, Dalhausie University, the Eastern Economic Society, and the History of Economic Thought Society for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Kahneman [Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates] Daniel B
    Daniel Kahneman [Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates] Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead Econ Journal Watch 10(3), September 2013: 381-385 Abstract Daniel Kahneman is among the 71 individuals who were awarded the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel between 1969 and 2012. This ideological profile is part of the project called “The Ideological Migration of the Economics Laureates,” which fills the September 2013 issue of Econ Journal Watch. Keywords Classical liberalism, economists, Nobel Prize in economics, ideology, ideological migration, intellectual biography. JEL classification A11, A13, B2, B3 Link to this document http://econjwatch.org/file_download/733/KahnemanIPEL.pdf IDEOLOGICAL PROFILES OF THE ECONOMICS LAUREATES suggests that successful decentralization is possible. But the answer may depend on how we define decentralization” (ibid.; also at Hurwicz 2008a, 290). References Bauer, Ann. 2008. Biography of Leonid Hurwicz. In Les Prix Nobel: The Nobel Prizes 2007, ed. Karl Grandin. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation. Link Grimes, William. 2008. Leonid Hurwicz, Nobel Economist, Dies at 90. New York Times, June 26. Link Hayek, Friedrich A. 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review 35: 519-530. Hurwicz, Leonid. 1972. On Informationally Decentralized Systems. In Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak, eds. C. B. McGuire and R. Radner. Amsterdam: North Holland. Hurwicz, Leonid. 1973. The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocations. American Economic Review 63(2): 1-30. Hurwicz, Leonid. 1984. “Economic Planning and the Knowledge Problem”: A Comment. Cato Journal 4(2): 419-425. Link Hurwicz, Leonid. 1998. But Who Will Guard the Guardians? Working paper, May 13.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Privacy †
    Journal of Economic Literature 2016, 54(2), 442–492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.54.2.442 The Economics of Privacy † Alessandro Acquisti, Curtis Taylor, and Liad Wagman* This article summarizes and draws connections among diverse streams of theoretical and empirical research on the economics of privacy. We focus on the economic value and consequences of protecting and disclosing personal information, and on consumers’ understanding and decisions regarding the trade-offs associated with the privacy and the sharing of personal data. We highlight how the economic analysis of privacy evolved over time, as advancements in information technology raised increasingly nuanced and complex issues. We find and highlight three themes that connect diverse insights from the literature. First, characterizing a single unifying economic theory of privacy is hard, because privacy issues of economic relevance arise in widely diverse contexts. Second, there are theoretical and empirical situations where the protection of privacy can both enhance and detract from individual and societal welfare. Third, in digital economies, consumers’ ability to make informed decisions about their privacy is severely hindered because consumers are often in a position of imperfect or asymmetric information regarding when their data is collected, for what purposes, and with what consequences. We conclude the article by highlighting some of the ongoing issues in the privacy debate of interest to economists. ( JEL D82, D83, G20, I10, L13, M31, M37) 1. Why an Economics of Privacy Friedrich Hayek’s 1945 treatise on the use of knowledge in society. Contributions to what he value and regulation of information has become known as the field of informa- Tassets have been among the most inter- tion economics have been among the most esting areas of economic research since influential, insightful, and intriguing in the * Acquisti: Heinz College, Carnegie Mellon Univer- Hal Varian, and Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius.
    [Show full text]
  • Cantillon: on the Relevance of the Monetary Economics of Richard Cantillon
    Back to Cantillon: On the Relevance of the Monetary Economics of Richard Cantillon A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University By Simon Bilo Master of Arts George Mason University, 2012 Engineer University of Economics in Prague, 2008 Master of Arts University of Economics in Prague, 2006 Director: Lawrence H. White, Professor Department of Economics Spring Semester 2013 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright 2013 Simon Bilo All Rights Reserved ii Dedication To my teachers. iii Acknowledgements I want to thank to my dissertation adviser, Lawrence H. White, for his time, support, and encouragement. I am also grateful to Peter J. Boettke, Mario J. Rizzo, Josef Šíma, and Richard E. Wagner. iv Table of Contents Page List of Tables..........................................................................................................vii List of Figures....................................................................................................... viii Abstract.................................................................................................................. ix Introduction............................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1: Notions of Non-neutrality: Lucas on Hume and Money........................5 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Lucas and Hume ..........................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Shackle on Time, Uncertainty and Process
    Shackle on time, uncertainty and process Article Accepted Version Latsis, J. (2015) Shackle on time, uncertainty and process. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39 (4). pp. 1149-1165. ISSN 1464-3545 doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev031 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/40237/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev031 Publisher: Oxford University Press All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Shackle on Time, Uncertainty and Process Introduction Contributions to heterodox economics have long made use of the idea of ‘process’ to provide an analytical lens through which to understand the history of economic thought (e.g. Nelson 2003), and as an essential element of the alternative ontology that the different heterodox schools of thought could be said to share (Lawson 2006; 2012). Institutionalist, feminist, post Keynesian or Austrian approaches are described as ‘processual’, or as relying on the ontological assumption that the social world is ‘dynamic’ and ‘exists in a continual state of becoming’ (Lawson 2006: 495). This description of what is claimed to be a unifying characteristic of the heterodoxy is readily connected to evolutionary or old institutionalist theories.
    [Show full text]