List of Cleared Or Approved Companion Diagnostic Devices (In Vitro and Imaging Tools)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Oncofocus® Precision Oncology
Medical Laboratory Accredited to ISO15189:2012 Oncofocus® Precision Oncology ONCOFOCUS® TEST REPORT Oncologica UK Ltd Suite 15-16, The Science Village Chesterford Research Park Cambridge, CB10 1XL, UK Tel: +44(0)1223 785327 Email: [email protected] Lead Clinical Scientist: - Pre-Reg Clinical Scientist: - Date: 1 of 30 ONC19 - Surname - Requester - Forename - Contact details - DOB - Date requested - Gender - Histology # - Tumour % - Primary site Breast Tumour % - Tumour subtype - (macrodissected) Tissue Type - Comment: The DNA and RNA extracted from this sample were of optimal quality. The Oncofocus assay on which the sample was run met all assay specific quality metrics. Oncofocus currently targets 505 genes covering oncogenes, fusion genes, genes susceptible to copy number variation and tumour suppressors. Actionable genetic variants detected by Oncofocus are currently linked to 687 anti-cancer targeted therapies/therapy combinations. The following actionable variants were detected: Within the 'Current Clinical Trials Information' section of this report, starting on page 8, the NCT numbers are hyperlinks to the clinicaltrials.gov webpages which should be accessed to gain further trial specific information Sample Cancer Type: Breast Cancer Clinically Significant Biomarkers Indicated Contraindicated Relevant Therapies Relevant Therapies Genomic Alteration Alt allele freq (In this cancer type) (In other cancer type) Clinical Trials ERBB2 p.(G727A) c.2180G>C 39% Clinical trials and/or off-label ado-trastuzumab emtansine 19 BRAF p.(V600E) c.1799T>A 5% Clinical trials and/or off-label dabrafenib 13 vemurafenib PIK3CA p.(G1049R) c.3145G>C 58% Clinical trials and/or off-label Clinical trials and/or off-label 15 Sources included in relevant therapies: EMA1, FDA2, ESMO, NCCN Hotspot variants with >10% alternate allele reads are classified as ‘detected’ with an assay sensitivity and positive predictive value(PPV) of 99%. -
Identification of Recurrent Mutational Events in Anorectal Melanoma
Modern Pathology (2017) 30, 286–296 286 © 2017 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/17 $32.00 Identification of recurrent mutational events in anorectal melanoma Hui Min Yang1,2,6, Susan J Hsiao1,6, David F Schaeffer2, Chi Lai3, Helen E Remotti1, David Horst4, Mahesh M Mansukhani1 and Basil A Horst1,5 1Department of Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 2Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 4Pathologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet, Muenchen, Germany and 5Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Anorectal melanoma is a rare disease that carries a poor prognosis. To date, limited genetic analyses confirmed KIT mutations as a recurrent genetic event similar to other mucosal melanomas, occurring in up to 30% of anorectal melanomas. Importantly, a subset of tumors harboring activating KIT mutations have been found to respond to c-Kit inhibitor-based therapy, with improved patient survival at advanced tumor stages. We performed comprehensive targeted exon sequencing analysis of 467 cancer-related genes in a larger series of 15 anorectal melanomas, focusing on potentially actionable variants based on gain- and loss-of-function mutations. We report the identification of oncogenic driver events in the majority (93%) of anorectal melanomas. These included variants in canonical MAPK pathway effectors rarely observed in cutaneous melanomas (including an HRAS mutation, as well as a BRAF mutation resulting in duplication of threonine 599), and recurrent mutations in the tumor suppressor NF1 in 20% of cases, which represented the second-most frequently mutated gene after KIT in our series. -
PI3K Inhibitors in Cancer: Clinical Implications and Adverse Effects
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review PI3K Inhibitors in Cancer: Clinical Implications and Adverse Effects Rosalin Mishra , Hima Patel, Samar Alanazi , Mary Kate Kilroy and Joan T. Garrett * Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0514, USA; [email protected] (R.M.); [email protected] (H.P.); [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (M.K.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-513-558-0741; Fax: +1-513-558-4372 Abstract: The phospatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is a crucial intracellular signaling pathway which is mutated or amplified in a wide variety of cancers including breast, gastric, ovarian, colorectal, prostate, glioblastoma and endometrial cancers. PI3K signaling plays an important role in cancer cell survival, angiogenesis and metastasis, making it a promising therapeutic target. There are several ongoing and completed clinical trials involving PI3K inhibitors (pan, isoform-specific and dual PI3K/mTOR) with the goal to find efficient PI3K inhibitors that could overcome resistance to current therapies. This review focuses on the current landscape of various PI3K inhibitors either as monotherapy or in combination therapies and the treatment outcomes involved in various phases of clinical trials in different cancer types. There is a discussion of the drug-related toxicities, challenges associated with these PI3K inhibitors and the adverse events leading to treatment failure. In addition, novel PI3K drugs that have potential to be translated in the clinic are highlighted. Keywords: cancer; PIK3CA; resistance; PI3K inhibitors Citation: Mishra, R.; Patel, H.; Alanazi, S.; Kilroy, M.K.; Garrett, J.T. -
Product Monograph Including Patient Medication Information
PRODUCT MONOGRAPH INCLUDING PATIENT MEDICATION INFORMATION Pr ® COTELLIC cobimetinib tablets 20 mg cobimetinib (as cobimetinib fumarate) Protein Kinase Inhibitor Date of Revision: Hoffmann-La Roche Limited January 5, 2018 7070 Mississauga Road Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5N 5M8 www.rochecanada.com Submission Control No: 209926 COTELLIC®, ZELBORAF® are registered trade-marks of F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, used under license ©Copyright 2016-2017, Hoffmann-La Roche Limited Page 1 of 38 Table of Contents PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .........................................................3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION ........................................................................3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ..............................................................................3 CONTRAINDICATIONS ...................................................................................................3 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ..................................................................................4 ADVERSE REACTIONS ..................................................................................................11 DRUG INTERACTIONS ..................................................................................................15 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ..............................................................................17 OVERDOSAGE ................................................................................................................20 ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ............................................................20 -
Clinical Response of the Novel Activating ALK-I1171T
http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Guan, J., Fransson, S., Siaw, J T., Treis, D., Van den Eynden, J. et al. (2018) Clinical response of the novel activating ALK-I1171T mutation in neuroblastoma o the ALK inhibitor ceritinib Cold Spring Harbor Molecular Case Studies, 4(4): a002550 https://doi.org/10.1101/mcs.a002550 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-154087 Downloaded from molecularcasestudies.cshlp.org on December 12, 2018 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press COLD SPRING HARBOR Molecular Case Studies | RESEARCH ARTICLE Clinical response of the novel activating ALK-I1171T mutation in neuroblastoma to the ALK inhibitor ceritinib Jikui Guan,1,2,12 Susanne Fransson,3,12 Joachim Tetteh Siaw,1,12 Diana Treis,4,12 Jimmy Van den Eynden,1 Damini Chand,1 Ganesh Umapathy,1 Kristina Ruuth,5 Petter Svenberg,4 Sandra Wessman,6,7 Alia Shamikh,6,7 Hans Jacobsson,8 Lena Gordon,9 Jakob Stenman,10 Pär-Johan Svensson,10 Magnus Hansson,11 Erik Larsson,1 Tommy Martinsson,3 Ruth H. Palmer,1 Per Kogner,6,7 and Bengt Hallberg1 1Department of Medical Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 40530, Sweden; 2Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, -
Alectinib Provides a New Option for ALK-Positive NSCLC Patients After Progression on Crizotinib See Commentary on Page 239
Community Translations Edited by Jame Abraham, MD, FACP Alectinib provides a new option for ALK-positive NSCLC patients after progression on crizotinib See Commentary on page 239 n December 2015, alectinib became the third ALK inhibitor approved by the United States Food and What’s new, what’s important IDrug Administration for the treatment of non-small- The US Food and Drug Administration approved alectinib to cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that displays rearrangements of treat patients with metastatic ALK-positive non-small-cell lung the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. Alectinib is cancer whose disease had progressed or who could not toler- a second-generation small molecule inhibitor of the ALK ate treatment with crizotinib. In clinical trials, alectinib showed a protein that joins ceritinib in providing a useful treatment partial response of 38%-44% and an average progression-free option for patients who have progressed on crizotinib, as survival of 11.2 months. In all, 61% of patients experienced a a result of its ability to target crizotinib-resistant mutant complete or partial reduction in their brain metastatic lesions, forms of the ALK protein. Alectinib also displays enhanced with a progression-free survival of of 9.1 months. The recom- penetrance of the blood-brain barrier, which improves ef- mended dose is 600 mg orally twice daily. cacy against central nervous system (CNS) metastases. The most common side effects are fatigue, constipation, swell- Te FDA awarded alectinib accelerated approval on the ing (edema), and muscle pain (myalgia). Treatment with alec- basis of 2 phase 2, single-arm clinical trials in patients tinib may cause sunburn when patients are exposed to sunlight, with ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed on and pregnant women should be notifed of the possible risk to crizotinib therapy, a group of patients who have few avail- the fetus, and to use contraception throughout treatment and for able treatment options. -
Pharmaceutics of Oral Anticancer Agents and Stimulants
Pharmaceutics of oral anticancer agents and stimulants Maikel Herbrink The research in this thesis was performed at the Departments of Pharmacy & Pharma- cology and Medical Oncology & Clinical Pharmacology of the Netherlands Cancer Insti- tute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Printing of this thesis was financially supported by: Netherlands Cancer Institute Chipsoft BV Pfizer BV ISBN: 978-90-393-6997-5 Design, lay-out and print Gildeprint, Enschede © Maikel Herbrink, 2018 Pharmaceutics of oral anticancer agents and stimulants Farmaceutisch onderzoek naar oraal toegediende antikankermiddelen en stimulantia (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. H.R.B.M. Kummeling, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 27 juni 2018 des middags te 4.15 uur door Maikel Herbrink geboren op 2 februari 1990 te Groningen Promotoren: Prof. dr. J.H. Beijnen Prof. dr. J.H.M. Schellens Copromotor: Dr. B. Nuijen Contents Preface 9 Chapter 1: Introduction 15 1.1 Variability in bioavailability of small molecular tyrosine 17 kinase inhibitors Cancer Treat Rev. 2015 May;41(5):412-422 1.2 Inherent formulation issues of kinase inhibitors 51 J Control Release. 2016 Oct;239:118-127 1.3 High-tech drugs in creaky formulations 81 Pharm Res. 2017 Sep;34(9):1751-1753 Chapter 2: Pharmaceutical analysis of oral anticancer drug substances 89 2.1. Thermal study of pazopanib hydrochloride 91 J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017 Dec;130(3):1491-1499 2.2. -
ZYKADIA (Ceritinib) RATIONALE for INCLUSION in PA PROGRAM
ZYKADIA (ceritinib) RATIONALE FOR INCLUSION IN PA PROGRAM Background Zykadia is used in patients with a certain type of late-stage (metastatic) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is caused by a defect in a gene called anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). Zykadia is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks proteins that promote the development of cancerous cells. It is intended for patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC (1). Regulatory Status FDA- approved indication: Zykadia is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as detected by an FDA-approved test (1). Off-Label Uses: (2-3) 1. Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor (IMT) with ALK translocation Zykadia can cause hepatotoxicity therefore liver function tests including AST, ALT and total bilirubin should be monitored at least monthly. Zykadia can cause interstitial lung disease (ILD) or pneumonitis. Zykadia should be permanently discontinued in patients diagnosed with treatment- related ILD/pneumonitis. Zykadia can cause QTc interval prolongation, which requires monitoring of electrocardiograms and electrolytes in patients with congestive heart failure (1). Zykadia is pregnancy category D and may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman (1). Safety and effectiveness of Zykadia in pediatric patients have not been established (1). Summary Zykadia is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks proteins that promote the development of cancerous cells. It is intended for patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC. Safety and effectiveness of Zykadia in patients under 18 years of age have not been established (1). Zykadia FEP Clinical Rationale ZYKADIA (ceritinib) Prior approval is required to ensure the safe, clinically appropriate and cost effective use of Zykadia while maintaining optimal therapeutic outcomes. -
Successful Chemotherapy Is Possible for Seemingly Inoperable Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer
® Clinical Thyroidology for the Public VOLUME 12 | ISSUE 12 | DECEMBER 2019 THYROID CANCER Successful chemotherapy is possible for seemingly inoperable anaplastic thyroid cancer BACKGROUND form of standard chemotherapy and 2 received another While the vast majority of thyroid cancers are slow tyrosine kinase inhibitor called pembrolizumab. Of the 6 growing and have an excellent prognosis, anaplastic patients that had surgery after this treatment, 4 patients thyroid cancer, which makes up <1% of all thyroid cancer, had the entire primary cancer removed and the other 2 is one of the most aggressive of all cancers, with a survival patients only had microscopic pieces of cancer left after averaging ~6 months after diagnosis. Surgery, radiation the surgery. After the surgery, 5 of 6 patients received and single drug chemotherapy is all ineffective in most standard chemotherapy and radiation to the surgical area. cases. The aim of this study is to study if combination Of the 6 patients, 4 patients had no evidence of cancer at chemotherapy will make previously inoperable anaplastic the last check, some over 2 years after surgery. The 2 other thyroid cancers safe to remove with surgery. patients did pass away from anaplastic cancer; however, there was no re-growth of cancer in the area where surgery THE FULL ARTICLE TITLE occurred. Wang JR et al 2019 Complete surgical resection following neoadjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAFV600E- WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS mutated anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 29:1036– OF THIS STUDY? 1043. PMID: 31319771. In selected patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer with the BRAF V600E mutation, treatment with dabrafenib SUMMARY OF THE STUDY and trametinib may increase the chance of having a In this study from the MD Anderson Cancer Center successful surgery of the primary tumor. -
Mutant Cancers 2 3 Heinz Hammerlindl1*, Dinoop Ravindran Menon1*, Sabrina Hammerlindl1, Abdullah Al
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on December 1, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2118 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Hammerlindl et. al 1 Acetylsalicylic Acid Governs the Effect of Sorafenib in RAS Mutant Cancers 2 3 Heinz Hammerlindl1*, Dinoop Ravindran Menon1*, Sabrina Hammerlindl1, Abdullah Al 4 Emran1, Joachim Torrano1, Katrin Sproesser3, Divya Thakkar1, Min Xiao3, Victoria G. 5 Atkinson5, Brian Gabrielli4, Nikolas K. Haass2, Meenhard Herlyn3, Clemens Krepler3, Helmut 6 Schaider1,2† 7 8 1Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, The University of 9 Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; 10 2The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, 11 Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; 12 3The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.; 13 4Mater Medical Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research 14 Institute, Brisbane, Australia; 15 5Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; 16 *These authors contributed equally to the study 17 18 Running title: 19 Combined aspirin and sorafenib for RAS-mutant cancer therapy 20 21 Key words: 22 Melanoma, Lung Cancer, NRAS, Sorafenib, Aspirin, RAS, ERK, AMPK 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on December 1, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2118 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Hammerlindl et. al 1 2 Grant Support 3 This work was funded by the Epiderm Foundation (H.S.), the Princess Alexandra Hospital 4 Research Foundation (PARSS2016_NearMiss) (H.S.), NIH grants PO1 CA114046, P50 5 CA174523, and the Dr. -
Phase I Trial of the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib and AKT Inhibitor Capivasertib in Patients with BRCA1/2- and Non–BRCA1/2-Mutant Cancers
Published OnlineFirst June 12, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0163 RESEARCH ARTICLE Phase I Trial of the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib and AKT Inhibitor Capivasertib in Patients with BRCA1/2- and Non–BRCA1/2-Mutant Cancers Timothy A. Yap1,2, Rebecca Kristeleit3, Vasiliki Michalarea1, Stephen J. Pettitt4,5, Joline S.J. Lim1, Suzanne Carreira2, Desamparados Roda1,2, Rowan Miller3, Ruth Riisnaes2, Susana Miranda2, Ines Figueiredo2, Daniel Nava Rodrigues2, Sarah Ward1,2, Ruth Matthews1,2, Mona Parmar1,2, Alison Turner1,2, Nina Tunariu1, Neha Chopra1,4, Heidrun Gevensleben2, Nicholas C. Turner1,4, Ruth Ruddle2, Florence I. Raynaud2, Shaun Decordova2, Karen E. Swales2, Laura Finneran2, Emma Hall2, Paul Rugman6, Justin P.O. Lindemann6, Andrew Foxley6, Christopher J. Lord4,5, Udai Banerji1,2, Ruth Plummer7, Bristi Basu8, Juanita S. Lopez1,2, Yvette Drew7, and Johann S. de Bono1,2 Downloaded from cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst June 12, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0163 ABSTRACT Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergy between PARP and PI3K/AKT path- way inhibitors in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2)–deficient andBRCA1/2 -proficient tumors. We conducted an investigator-initiated phase I trial utilizing a prospective intrapatient dose- escalation design to assess two schedules of capivasertib (AKT inhibitor) with olaparib (PARP inhibi- tor) in 64 patients with advanced solid tumors. Dose expansions enrolled germline BRCA1/2-mutant tumors, or BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers harboring somatic DNA damage response (DDR) or PI3K–AKT pathway alterations. The combination was well tolerated. Recommended phase II doses for the two schedules were: olaparib 300 mg twice a day with either capivasertib 400 mg twice a day 4 days on, 3 days off, or capivasertib 640 mg twice a day 2 days on, 5 days off. -
Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition with Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib for Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Review Melanoma Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition with Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Antonio M Grimaldi, Ester Simeone, Lucia Festino, Vito Vanella and Paolo A Ascierto Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione “G. Pascale”, Napoli, Italy cquired resistance is the most common cause of BRAF inhibitor monotherapy treatment failure, with the majority of patients experiencing disease progression with a median progression-free survival of 6-8 months. As such, there has been considerable A focus on combined therapy with dual BRAF and MEK inhibition as a means to improve outcomes compared with monotherapy. In the COMBI-d and COMBI-v trials, combined dabrafenib and trametinib was associated with significant improvements in outcomes compared with dabrafenib or vemurafenib monotherapy, in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. The combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib has also been investigated. In the phase III CoBRIM study in patients with unresectable stage III-IV BRAF-mutant melanoma, treatment with vemurafenib and cobimetinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with vemurafenib alone. One-year OS was 74.5% in the vemurafenib and cobimetinib group and 63.8% in the vemurafenib group, while 2-year OS rates were 48.3% and 38.0%, respectively. The combination was also well tolerated, with a lower incidence of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma compared with monotherapy. Dual inhibition of both MEK and BRAF appears to provide a more potent and durable anti-tumour effect than BRAF monotherapy, helping to prevent acquired resistance as well as decreasing adverse events related to BRAF inhibitor-induced activation of the MAPK-pathway.