Editorial - Beyond E-Commerce the Social Case of China’S Digital Economy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
China Perspectives 2017/4 | 2017 Grassroots Makers of Chinese Digital Economy Editorial - Beyond E-Commerce The Social Case of China’s Digital Economy Haiqing Yu Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/7452 DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.7452 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2017 Number of pages: 3-8 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Haiqing Yu, « Editorial - Beyond E-Commerce », China Perspectives [Online], 2017/4 | 2017, Online since 01 December 2017, connection on 23 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ chinaperspectives/7452 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.7452 © All rights reserved Editorial China perspectives Beyond E-Commerce: The Social Case of China’s Digital Economy HAIQING YU his special feature brings together three original articles on Internet omy and the dominance of the US in global digital capitalism, China is finance, grassroots programmers, and an e-psychotherapy platform, poised to lead in digital productivity and innovation. This is a result of the Trespectively, to engage in the ongoing debate on China’s e-commerce state-centred approach to economic development and restructuring, with and digital economy. The three authors contribute to a rethinking of the digital media, technology, and telecommunication as the new epicentre of Chinese digital capitalism from the perspective of sociology (Nicholas Lou - economic growth and market reforms in the 2000s (Zhao 2008; Hong bere), anthropology (Ping Sun), and social psychology (Hsuan-Ying Huang). 2017a). Such a techno-economic discourse, particularly since the 2008 They pinpoint the role of commercial activities as vehicles to highlight global financial crisis, emphasises developing cutting-edge digital technolo - human agency and diversity in China’s transformations. The three articles— gies, platforms, infrastructure, and economy to ensure China’s leadership in “China’s Internet Finance and Tyrannies of Inclusion” by Loubere, “Program - emerging technologies such as AI (artificial intelligence), VR (virtual reality), ming Practices of Chinese Code Farmers” by Sun, and “Therapy Made Easy” 3D printing, drones, robotics, and driveless cars. As Yu Hong (2017a) argues, by Huang—not only provide empirical studies of particular grassroots play - the Chinese state plays a key role in fostering a sophisticated communica - ers or makers in China’s e-commerce and digital economy, but also critically tive ecosystem—a system that has been spearheaded by entrepreneurial discuss their role and agency in negotiating the complicated network of bureaucrats, transnational capitalists and their representatives within and power and knowledge to create a politics of difference in people’s daily lives. outside of China, an outward-looking middle-class, and China’s own digital The special feature contributes to the debates on Chinese digital economy champions. Among the digital champions, BAT (Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent) from a micro and meso-level analysis that is rooted in the humanities and and their competitors have been at the forefront of developing a networked social sciences. It examines the grassroots participants and makers of digital economy and being close allies to the Chinese government in pro - China’s e-commerce boom, and at the same time moves beyond the dis - moting e-entrepreneurship, e-consumerism, e-surveillance, and e-solutions cussion on e-commerce to critique the paradoxes of Chinese digital capi - to various issues and problems through big data, cloud computing, IoT (In - talism, as experienced by poor and disadvantaged individuals engulfed by ternet of Things), and an array of digital computing technologies. entrepreneurial digital loan sharks and systems of social surveillance (Lou - China is among many Asian countries (particularly Singapore, Indonesia, bere), the second-generation-migrant grassroots programmers or code India, and Korea) that have experienced exponential growth, rapid innova - farmers in small software companies in Shenzhen (Sun), and an en - tion, and broad application of digitised information, knowledge, production, trepreneurial psychotherapist whose online platform has taken on the mis - and consumption. Digital economy is characterised by the use of modern sion of constructing a psychotherapy infrastructure for an under-developed information networks and communication technologies, such as the Inter - profession (Huang). Together the three articles aim to redefine the “who” net, cloud computing, big data, IoT, and FinTech, to transform social inter - of digital economy as an unlikely collection of unimagined individuals and actions, drive productivity, stimulate innovation, and enable economic underrepresented groups; the “what” of digital economy as measured by its activities to be more flexible, agile, creative, and smart. From hardware (e.g. social and cultural impact rather than its volume of business and transac - Lenovo and Huawei) to software (AI, cloud computing, various digital pay - tion; and the “how” of digital economy in terms of the implication of and ment systems), from content (e.g. Chinese blockbusters and cultural her - impact on grassroots players in their strategies for survival. itage) to platforms (e.g. WeChat and Taobao), Chinese digital economy is In what follows, I provide a brief review of the emergence of digital econ - not simply on the rise, but is also challenging the “platform imperialism” omy in China, its incorporation into the state developmental strategy, and thesis, which argues that Western-based digital platform empires (such as the role of digital labour in forming an invisible human infrastructure vis-à- Facebook, Google, and Amazon) will continue to dominate the global dig - vis the visible digital infrastructure and platforms. Such a discussion, though ital platform markets, despite increasing competition from emerging com - by no means thorough and comprehensive, provides the backdrop for the panies and countercultural flow from non-Western countries in the discussion of the various paradoxes of Chinese digital capitalism to be ad - twenty-first century (Jin 2015). In fact, China has not only been integrated dressed in this special feature. into the global digital capitalism, but is also transforming itself from a downstream manufacturing powerhouse into an innovative nation, with The rise of China’s digital economy the Internet and digital technologies powering such a transformation and economic restructuring. It is known that China and digital capitalism are two pillars of global digital 1. Also see: John Thornhill, “China’s Digital Economy is a Global Trailblazer,” Financial Times , 21 March capitalism and that “China’s digital economy is a global trailblazer” (Schiller 2017, https://www.ft.com/content/86cbda82-0d55-11e7-b030-768954394623?mhq5j=e7 (ac - 2000). (1) Despite being a latecomer to the new playing field of digital econ - cessed on 28 October 2017). N o. 2017/4 • china perspectives 3 Editorial In China the digital economy has surged since 2015 to a 30.61% share of trade has soared and remained resilient despite an economic slowdown. As the nation’s 2016 GDP. (2) It is poised to “set the world’s digital frontier” and online sales and shopping continue to grow—not only among the middle become a leading global force in key digital areas. (3) As discussed above, the and upper middle class and affluent households in metropolitan centres but digital economy is seen by Chinese political and business leaders as a critical also among hundreds of millions of people in less-developed areas (small lever for economic restructuring that steers the country from a low-wage cities, towns, and villages), scholarship on China’s e-commerce miracle also assembly model dependent on foreign technology to an innovative nation increases, with a focus on big players, market and consumer analysis, and with the “created in China” brand (Hong 2017b; Keane 2007). It exemplifies structural and legal issues, often from disciplines in various business and a state-centred approach to digital capitalism. This approach has always law schools. characterised economic development in China. More recently we have wit - Existing scholarship on China’s digital economy and e-commerce has nessed the role of the government in laying out China’s digital future noted the phenomenal success of BAT, their competitors, and a number of through the “Internet Plus” strategy and “mass entrepreneurship and mass digital start-ups; it has examined the radical disruptions brought by the in - innovation” blueprint, which were proposed by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang novative use of technologies by the so-called born-digital and grown-digital and written into the government report in 2015. Previous Five Year Plans firms represented by Yihaodian and Suning, respectively (e.g. Leong, Pan, prioritised infrastructure and technological innovation, with a focus on hard - and Liu 2016). This body of research is underpinned by a strong faith in the ware and network construction, which required expertise and capital role of ICTs (information and communication technologies) toward com - through state-funded institutions and projects. The 13th Five Year Plan munity empowerment and social innovation, in urban as well as rural (2016-2020) moves the agenda in a new direction: to “upgrade” ( shengji Taobao villages (Yue et al. 2015; Sitoh, Pan, and Cui 2014). China’s Taobao 升级 ) China’s